Abstract
The anti-bone resorptive drugs denosumab, an anti-human-RANKL antibody, and zoledronic acid (ZOL), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, have recently been applied for treatment of pediatric patients with bone diseases, though details regarding their effects in growing children have yet to be fully elucidated. In the present study, we administered these anti-resorptive drugs to mice from the age of 1 week and continued once-weekly injections for a total of 7 times. Mice that received the anti-RANKL antibody displayed normal growth and tooth eruption, though osteopetrotic bone volume gain in long and alveolar bones was noted, while there were nearly no osteoclasts and a normal of number osteoblasts observed. In contrast, ZOL significantly delayed body growth, tooth root formation, and tooth eruption, with increased osteoclast and decreased osteoblast numbers. These findings suggest regulation of tooth eruption via osteoblast differentiation by some types of anti-resorptive drugs.
Subject terms: Bone development, Paediatric research
Introduction
Bone is dynamic tissue, and continued bone modeling during the neonatal and adolescent periods is essential for vertebrate growth. Normal bone development is maintained by a balance between formation by osteoblasts and resorption by osteoclasts1, while enhanced bone resorption by osteoclasts can lead to development of bone diseases, such as osteoporosis and bone metastasis2,3. Osteoclast differentiation and function are regulated by a key cytokine termed receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)4, a type II transmembrane protein and member of the tumor necrosis superfamily that is produced by bone marrow stromal cells, osteocytes, and osteoblasts4,5. When RANKL binds to its receptor RANK, monocyte-macrophage progenitors differentiate into osteoclasts and induce bone resorption4. Due to their inhibitory effects towards osteoclasts, anti-resorptive drugs such as denosumab and bisphosphonates are used to treat patients with osteoclastic bone disease.
Denosumab, a novel anti-resorptive drug, is a fully human monoclonal anti-RANKL antibody that binds to RANKL, and strongly inhibits osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption6. On the other hand, zoledronic acid (ZOL) is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate and one of the most potent known inhibitors of bone resorption, with a known affinity for hydroxyapatite7. When isolated from bone surfaces by resorption of osteoclasts by bone tissues, ZOL induces cell apoptosis and functional decline via inhibition of mevalonate metabolism8. Because of their strong therapeutic effects, denosumab and ZOL are routinely given to adult patients for treatment of bone destruction9–11.
In recent years, denosumab and ZOL have also been applied for treatment of bone diseases in child cases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta12,13, giant cell bone tumors14,15, and juvenile-onset osteoporosis16,17. Both can increase bone mineral density12,13 and also ameliorate pain associated with bone tumors in children14,18. However, there is insufficient information in regard to efficacy and toxicity, thus use of anti-resorptive drugs in pediatric patients remains controversial19,20. Child bone diseases are known to inhibit hard tissue development, for example, osteogenesis imperfecta has been shown to evoke growth suppression and dentinogenesis imperfecta12,13, though it remains unclear whether the pathogenesis of abnormal growth in affected children is due to anti-resorptive drug administration or the bone disease itself.
Osteoclasts are essential for bone development and tooth eruption after birth21,22, while RANKL deficiency initiates osteopetrotic long bone development and tooth eruption failure23. Thus, we hypothesized that osteoclast suppression by anti-resorptive drugs inhibits both bone growth and tooth eruption in developing children. To elucidate the effects and toxicity of anti-resorptive drugs when used for long-term treatment in growing child patients, we continuously administered an anti-mouse-RANKL antibody or a bisphosphonate ZOL to young mice throughout the entire growth phase, and then examined the effects on growth, bone development, and tooth eruption. In addition, to investigate the influence on adults treated during childhood, a single administration was given to infant mice and analysis performed.
Results
Mice administered anti-RANKL antibody grew normally, while ZOL injection suppressed body growth
Denosumab does not cross-react with mouse RANKL, thus we used a rat anti-mouse RANKL antibody for this study. Initially, the negative isotype control immunoglobulin G (rat IgG, 2.5 mg/kg) group was compared with the saline (control) group to exclude the possibility of an effect of IgG on growth. Both a single injection and long-term administration resulted in no significant differences regarding survival rate, body growth, and tooth eruption (see Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2).
To clarify the effects of anti-resorptive drugs in adults whose treatment was finished in childhood, we performed a single subcutaneous injection of 2.5 mg/kg of the anti-mouse RANKL antibody, 0.08 mg/kg of ZOL (reference dose: RfD-ZOL), 3.0 mg/kg of ZOL (cumulative dose: CD-ZOL), or saline into 1-week-old mice. The survival rates of mice at 8 weeks of age in the saline, anti-RANKL antibody, RfD-ZOL, and CD-ZOL treatment groups were 100%, 75%, 100%, and 88%, respectively. At the age of 8 weeks, mice treated with the anti-RANKL antibody or RfD-ZOL displayed normal growth, whereas the CD-ZOL-treated mice showed significantly suppressed body length and weight (see Supplementary Fig. S3).
Next, to investigate the long-term effects of anti-resorptive drugs during the growth period, each drug was administered weekly to mice aged 1 to 7 weeks old. The survival rates of mice at 8 weeks of age in the saline, anti-RANKL antibody, RfD-ZOL, and CD-ZOL treatment groups were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 83%, respectively (Fig. 1B). Mice in the anti-RANKL antibody-treated group showed no significant differences regarding naso-anal length and body weight as compared with the saline-injected group. In contrast, body length and weight in the CD-ZOL-treated group were significantly lower as compared to mice in the saline and anti-RANKL antibody groups (Fig. 1C–E). Furthermore, the RfD-ZOL-treated group showed a tendency for growth suppression. The growth reduction in the ZOL-treated group occurred in a concentration-dependent manner. The ratio of spleen/total body weight was not significantly different among all of the experimental groups (see Supplementary Fig. S4). All mice showed normal eating behavior throughout the experimental period.
Anti-RANKL antibody increased femur bone mass and suppressed tibia osteoclastogenesis, while tibia osteoclast number was not significantly suppressed by ZOL
To identify the effects of anti-resorptive drugs on child bone development, we measured femur bone length and analyzed bone mass in the experimental groups using three-dimensional microstructural (μCT) imaging. Injection of the anti-RANKL antibody or ZOL has been reported to cause decreased tibial bone length in adult mice24–26. In the present study, there were no significant differences in regard to femur bone length at 8 weeks of age following a single injection or long-term administration of the anti-RANKL antibody in growing mice as compared to the control group. On the other hand, ZOL-treated mice treated that received either a single injection or weekly administration for 7 weeks showed significantly shorter femur bone length in a dose-dependent manner than mice in the saline-injected and anti-RANKL antibody-treated groups (Fig. 2A,D, see Supplementary Fig. S3).
In previous studies, denosumab and bisphosphonates were found to increase bone mass in adult mice24,26, as well as human children during development12,13. Consistent with those results, femoral bones in both the anti-RANKL antibody- and ZOL-treated mice in the present study showed increased bone mass regardless of the administration period (Fig. 2B,E, see Supplementary Fig. S3). Both the anti-RANKL antibody- and CD-ZOL injected groups showed greater than 100% bone mineral density, thus it could not be accurately measured (data not shown). Tibiae bone histological sections from the anti-RANKL antibody- and ZOL-treated mice were stained with toluidine blue, which revealed increased bone mass in the proximal tibiae metaphysis, as previously described24,25. Furthermore, staining with tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), a histochemical marker of osteoclasts, revealed a significantly lower number of osteoclasts in the long-term anti-RANKL antibody-treated mice as compared to the saline-injected and RfD-ZOL-treated groups. In contrast, there was no significant difference regarding the number of tibia osteoclasts in the Ref- and CD-ZOL-treated mice as compared to those given saline (Fig. 2C,F). Bone volume in these mice was high, thus we were unable to perform dynamic histometric analysis.
CD-ZOL treatment resulted in delayed tooth eruption
Three-dimensional μCT analysis of skulls from 8-week-old mice that received a single injection or long-term treatment of CD-ZOL showed delayed tooth eruption in both of those groups as compared to the saline-injected group, as previously reported24,25, whereas the anti-RANKL antibody-treated group demonstrated normal tooth growth (Fig. 3A–C, see Supplementary Fig. S3). Next, we measured crown and root lengths to determine the crown-to-root ratio, and also determined interradicular septum length, and used those values as tooth developing indexes in an attempt to determine the cause of delayed tooth eruption. There were no significant differences between the anti-RANKL antibody- and RfD-ZOL-treated groups as compared to the saline-injected group for tooth index values (Fig. 3E–H). On the other hand, CD-ZOL-treated mice showed normal crown length and decreased root length as compared with the saline-injected and anti-RANKL antibody-treated groups, resulting in a significantly increased crown-to-root ratio (Fig. 3E–G), while the interradicular septum length was also significantly decreased in that group (Fig. 3H).
Anti-RANKL antibody suppressed osteoclastogenesis in alveolar bone and ZOL significantly suppressed osteoblastogenesis
To further investigate the cause of delayed tooth eruption, we performed histomorphometric analysis of alveolar bone samples obtained from mandibular first molar sections, following Villanueva staining27,28. In the group treated with the anti-RANKL antibody for 7 weeks, interradicular septum bone volume was increased as compared to the saline-injected group, whereas that was decreased in the CD-ZOL-treated group, because of the shorter root as compared to the saline-injected group (Fig. 4A,D). Mice treated with the anti-RANKL antibody showed no osteoclasts on bone surfaces, which resulted in a lower amount of erosion in that location than in the saline-injected group. In contrast, ZOL treatment increased the numbers of osteoclasts in a dose-dependent manner as well as eroded surface area as compared with the saline-injected and anti-RANKL antibody-treated groups (Fig. 4B), which confirmed previously reported findings25. Furthermore, as compared to the control, there was a significant decrease in number of alveolar bone osteoblasts and osteoblast surface on bone surfaces (Ob.S/BS) in the CD-ZOL-treated group, and a tendency for decreased Ob.S/BS in the RfD-ZOL-treated group, while the anti-RANKL antibody-treated group showed no change (Fig. 4C). Also, the osteoid surface of alveolar bone surrounding the lower first molar and osteoid volume/bone volume was significantly decreased in the 3 experimental groups (Fig. 4C), whereas the number of osteocytes was not different (Fig. 4E).
Discussion
Clinical trials of anti-resorptive drugs for treatment of pediatric bone diseases have been conducted worldwide in recent years13,29,30. Among the treatments examined, denosumab has been shown to be a highly effective novel anti-resorptive drug, though basic information regarding its effects in small animals is insufficient, especially during growth stages, as it is a human antibody preparation that has no cross-reactivity in mice. Another effective medication is ZOL, a strong bisphosphonate administered for treatment of bone metastasis in adults. It is anticipated that these major anti-resorptive drugs will be applied for bone diseases in pediatric cases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta13, giant cell bone tumor29, and osteosarcoma30, in the near future.
We examined the effects of mouse anti-RANKL antibody and ZOL administrations in growing mice. Those treated with the antibody showed normal body length and weight, as well as tooth eruption, while those treated with ZOL showed smaller bodies and lower body weight, along with delayed tooth eruption, which occurred in a dose-dependent manner. In human adults, the mean serum half-life of the anti-RANKL antibody is approximately 1 month, which is significantly longer than that of ZOL at approximately 24 hours31,32. However, our findings suggested that ZOL, especially when given at a high therapeutic dose, showed longer and sustained action as compared with the anti-RANKL antibody in growing mice, the same effects seen in grown adults. Bisphosphonates have been reported to have a high affinity to hydroxyapatite7, thus a prolonged duration of drug action and toxic effects may be exerted in children as compared to anti-RANKL antibody administration. Moreover, high-dose ZOL is known to cause osteoblast inhibition33 and cartilage suppression during the administration period34, as well as have possible hepatotoxicity effects35,36, thus additional investigations from the viewpoint of toxicity of high-dose ZOL are needed to elucidate related growth inhibition mechanisms. RANKL deficiency evokes swelling of the spleen and extramedullary hematopoiesis23. As a result, in contrast to a RANKL-deficient mouse phenotype, developed spleens do not show significant differences in growing mice, because RANKL activity in the prenatal stage is adequate for mouse spleen formation37.
Another phenotype seen in RANKL-deficient mice is a complete lack of osteoclasts, and these animals develop severe osteopetrosis as well as tooth eruption defects23. In the present study, the anti-RANKL antibody significantly decreased osteoclasts and increased bone mass, with an osteopetrotic phenotype shown in long bones of growing mice. The ZOL-injected group also demonstrated a marble bone pattern in long bones, while the number of osteoclasts was nearly equal to that seen in the control. ZOL inactivates osteoclasts38 and long-term administration was shown to increase bone mass without decreasing osteoclast number in adult mice39, with similar results obtained with the present growing mice. While the anti-RANKL antibody-treated mice showed higher bone volume as compared to RfD-ZOL-treated mice, femur length was not different as compared to control mice. These results suggest that osteoblastic bone formation in developing long bones is induced with or without osteoclasts during treatment with anti-resorptive drugs. Short stature, a phenotype seen in young osteopetrosis patients40, is thought to be caused by delayed bone growth and high bone mineral density, though requires further investigation from a perspective other than examination of osteoblasts and osteoclasts.
We considered that the shorter long bone seen in the high-dose CD-ZOL-group was caused by suppressed chondrocyte differentiation, because repeated administration in developing animals during endochondral ossification has been reported to induce retention of the endochondral cartilage matrix within cortical bone and loss of bone length41. Continuous ZOL administration in growing mice for a short period was reported to decrease the TRACP5b level in serum and increase bone formation in the metaphysis, while a tendency for decreased tibia length was also noted34. Once treatment has finished, development of metaphysis restarts with normal epiphyseal cartilage, while the TRAP level in serum remains low. Following a single injection of high-dose ZOL, the epiphyseal plate and trabeculae remain nearly normal, though not after long-term administration in the present study, could explain with that previous report34.
Marks and Cahill placed replica metal teeth in tooth extraction cavities expected to support eruption without normal tooth tissue, and found that the dental follicle is essential for tooth eruption42. The coronal half of the dental follicle promotes alveolar bone osteoclastogenesis, which is mediated by RANKL, and creates an eruption pathway with continuous osteoclastic bone resorption of alveolar bone near the tooth crown43–46. The present anti-RANKL antibody-treated mice showed normal tooth development with a reduced number of osteoclasts. On postnatal day 5, a major burst of osteoclast differentiation typically occurs in mice47 and our findings suggest that the eruption pathway is created by osteoclasts early in the postnatal period. In contrast, even a single injection of high-dose ZOL on postnatal day 7 decreased tooth eruption in the present mice, which has also been observed in human studies48,49. As preparation for tooth eruption, the basal half of the dental follicle promotes osteogenesis and creates a trabecular morphology in alveolar bone45. In human molars, interradicular septum growth is especially important for tooth eruption50. Therefore, increased alveolar bone volume and length induced by osteoblasts from the dental follicle are thought to push teeth and accelerate eruption. In the present study, ZOL reduced the number of osteoblasts in the interradicular septum of first molars, which resulted in eruption delay. Our results suggest that decreased osteogenesis derived from the dental follicle by administration of ZOL delays tooth eruption. In rodents, lower molar development is initiated in the embryo and continues after birth21, while maximal bone formation for development begins from postnatal day 9–1451. Based on the present findings, we consider that ZOL might crucially affect alveolar bone formation during the period of lower first molar development.
Tooth root formation in CD-ZOL administrated mice was substantially decreased, while the anti-RANKL antibody group showed normal root length, thus it is considered that osteoclasts are not essential for root formation. Takahashi et al. reported that dental follicle mesenchymal progenitor cells differentiated into cementoblasts on the acellular cementum, as well as periodontal ligament cells and alveolar cryptal bone osteoblasts during root formation52. Deletion of parathyroid hormone signaling by dental follicle cells induces loss of periodontal attachment and failure of tooth eruption along with up-regulation of some matrix proteins. In the present study, CD-ZOL-injection significantly decreased the number of osteoblasts in alveolar bone. The lower first molar root in mice is known to be initiated on postnatal day 6 to 853, while ZOL administration likely decreases the number of cementoblasts and periodontal ligament cells, leading to failure of tooth eruption. The present ZOL-treated group showed both maxilla and mandible tooth eruption failure, resulting in open bite in the occlusion.
Contrary to other well-known ZOL effects, mono/multi-osteoclast numbers were increased, resulting in a high percentage of teeth with an eroded surface in mice in the long-term ZOL-treated group. Growing alveolar bone has a high mount of turnover54, with bone formation and bone resorption enhanced by osteoblast/osteoclast coupling. ZOL treatment suppressed osteoclast function, though bone resorptive activity was partially retained. Activated resorption in growing alveolar bone without adequate formation might have ostensibly increased the ES/BS ratio in the ZOL-treated group as compared to the control. In some cases, bone disease is accompanied by tooth or jaw bone abnormalities, such as osteogenesis imperfecta accompanied by dentinogenesis imperfecta. Additional research is needed to clarify the effects of anti-resorptive drugs on teeth of pediatric patients affected by bone disease.
In summary, administration of anti-resorptive drugs resulted in increased bone volume in developing mice. Furthermore, the bisphosphonate ZOL induced growth retardation, while the anti-RANKL antibody showed no developmental side-effects. Inhibition of osteogenesis in the dental follicle by ZOL led to delayed tooth eruption, though normal tooth eruption occurred, in contrast to inhibition of osteoclastogenesis by the anti-RANKL antibody. These results are important in regard to determination of appropriate treatment protocols for affected child patients. When an anti-resorptive drug is given for treatment of pediatric disease, both the concentration and administration period must be carefully determined.
Methods
Reagents
A rat anti-mouse RANKL antibody (clone OYC1; Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan) was used in this study. ZOL (Zometa; Novartis Pharma, Tokyo, Japan), saline (Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan), and rat IgG (Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan) were obtained from their respective commercial sources.
Animals and breeding environment
Newborn C57BL/6J mice, born to inbred parents over 8 weeks old (Sankyo Labo Service Corporation, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), were used in these experiments, as the C57BL/6J strain has been widely used for anti-resorptive drug experiments26. Eight or 9 pups, breastfed by a single mother, were weaned at 4 weeks, then fed with powdered chow for 1 week and normally thereafter. The experiments were started with 1-week-old healthy male mice with weights ranging from 3.0–5.6 g (average 4.3 g). The animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions and euthanized at 8 weeks of age. All experiments were performed in full compliance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of Showa University, Showa University Animal Care and Use Committee, Japan, after receiving approval from the committee (certificate numbers 17050 and 18073).
Single injection of anti-resorptive agents
The anti-resorptive drug concentrations, 2.5 mg/kg of anti-mouse RANKL antibody and 0.08 mg/kg ZOL (RfD-ZOL), were determined based on the adult therapeutic dose and calculated based on body weight. The high dosage of ZOL (CD-ZOL), 3.0 mg/kg/week for 7 weeks (total 21 mg/kg), was decided based on the cumulative dose for human child osteogenesis imperfecta patients (mean dose 29 mg/kg), as previously described48.
Thirty-three 1-week-old male mice were randomly assigned to 5 different groups, as follows: saline (n = 4), rat IgG (n = 8), anti-RANKL antibody (n = 8), RfD-ZOL (n = 5), and CD-ZOL (n = 8). Drugs were subcutaneously administrated to the 1-week-old mice with a single injection using a 27G, 1.5-inch needle (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Findings from 4 mice in the saline, 5 in the rat IgG, 6 in the anti-RANKL antibody, 5 in the RfD-ZOL, and 7 in the CD-ZOL groups were analyzed, as 3 in the rat IgG-treated, 2 in the anti-RANKL-treated, and 1 in the CD-ZOL-treated groups died during the experimental period.
Long-term anti-resorptive drug treatment protocol
Twenty-eight 1-week-old male mice were randomly assigned to 5 different groups, as follows: saline (n = 6), rat IgG (n = 5), anti-RANKL antibody (n = 5), RfD-ZOL (n = 6), and CD-ZOL (n = 6). The first administration of each drug was at the age of 1 week and then continued once a week for a total of 7 injections. Findings from 6 mice in the saline, 5 in the rat IgG, 5 in the anti-RANKL antibody, 6 in the RfD-ZOL, and 5 in the CD-ZOL groups were analyzed, as 1 in the CD-ZOL-treated group died during the experimental period.
Determination of growth index and percentage spleen weight
Determination of body length, measured from the nasal tip to anus (naso-anal length), was performed at 8 weeks of age, while body weight was determined weekly until 8 weeks and percentage spleen weight was calculated using spleen weight/body weight at 8 weeks of age.
Micro-computed tomography analysis
The head, mandibular alveolar molar bone, and right femur were obtained from mice at the age of 8 weeks, then fixed in 70% ethanol and scanned using a ScanXmate-L090H (Comscantecno, Yokohama, Japan). For µCT measurements, the samples were analyzed at 80 kV and 81 µA. Three-dimensional microstructural image data were reconstructed and analyzed using a TRI/3D-BON-FCS system (Ratoc System Engineering, Tokyo, Japan). Bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and other bone morphometric analyses of the femur at approximately 1.0 mm above the distal growth plate were performed as previously described55.
Histological analysis
The left tibia was obtained at the age of 8 weeks and dehydrated in 70% ethanol, then embedded in glycol methacrylate and longitudinally sectioned into 3-μm slices using a microtome. The sections were stained with toluidine blue or tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP, histochemical marker of osteoclasts), as previously described56,57. Static histomorphometry evaluations of first molar alveolar bone samples were done as previously described27,58. Briefly, the right mandibular was obtained at 8 weeks and fixed in 70% ethanol, then stained for 4 days using the Villanueva method27,28. Subsequently, bone samples were dehydrated, embedded in methyl methacrylate, and sectioned in a sagittal manner into 5-μm slices using a microtome. Osteoclast counts were performed by an experienced researcher using polarization microscopy. Static parameters for bone formation and resorption were determined in an area 1.0 mm longitudinal and 0.75 cm horizontal from the interradicular septum by direct tracing using a Histometry RT digitizer (System Supply, Yokohama, Japan), then computed using specialized software (CSS-840 cancellous bone morphometry version; System Supply). For static parameters, osteoclast numbers/bone surface (N.Oc/BS), osteoblast numbers/bone surface (N.Ob/BS), and osteocyte numbers (N/Ot) were counted, while for structural parameters osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS), eroded surface area (ES/BS), osteoblast surface (Ob.S/BS), osteoid surface area (OS/BS) on the bone surface, osteoid volume/bone volume (OV/BV), and bone volume of the interradicular septum (BV.IRS) were determined.
Statistical analysis
Results were analyzed using Student’s-t test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s test. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank all the members of our laboratory for their insightful comments and suggestions. This work was supported in part by the Private University Research Branding Project of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) to Showa University, and the Industry to Support Private Universities Building up Their Foundations of Strategic Research of MEXT (No. S1411009, S1201014, S0801016) to M.T., as well as grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (B) to M.T. (No. 24659830, 26293398) and T.N.-K. (No. 25293066), for Scientific Research (C) to N.S. (No. 17K11993) and A.K (No. 18K09866), for Challenging Exploratory Research to T.N.-K. (No. 15K15538), for Young Scientists (B) to A.K. (No. 16K20655), for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas to M.C. (No. 16H01635 and 18H04986), for Challenging Exploratory Research to M.C. (No. 16K15778), and for Research Activity Start-up to M.I. (No. 18H06332) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Grants-in-aid were also received from The Science Research Promotion Fund and a Showa University Research Grant for Young Researchers was received by A.K. Grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, The Naito Foundation, and the Takeda Science Foundation were given to T.N.-K.
Author contributions
M.I. performed most of the experiments, interpreted results, and prepared the manuscript. M.I., A.K. and S.N. researched relevant data. S.N., N.S., M.K., M.C., T.N.-K., M.S., M.I. and Y.S. critically revised the manuscript. M.I., A.K. and M.T. designed the experiments. A.K. drafted the manuscript. M.T. supervised the study. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, including questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of this work.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Motoki Isawa and Akiko Karakawa.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-56151-1.
References
- 1.Paiva KBS, Granjeiro JM. Bone tissue remodeling and development: focus on matrix metalloproteinase functions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014;561:74–87. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science. 2000;289:1504–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weilbaecher KN, Guise TA, McCauley LK. Cancer to bone: a fatal attraction. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:411–25. doi: 10.1038/nrc3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Suda T. A new member of tumor necrosis factor ligand family, ODF/OPGL/TRANCE/RANKL, regulates osteoclast differentiation and function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;256:449–455. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kartsogiannis V, et al. Localization of RANKL (receptor activator of NF kappa B ligand) mRNA and protein in skeletal and extraskeletal tissues. Bone. 1999;25:525–34. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00214-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kearns AE, Khosla S, Kostenuik PJ. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease. Endocr. Rev. 2008;29:155–192. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nancollas GH, et al. Novel insights into actions of bisphosphonates on bone: differences in interactions with hydroxyapatite. Bone. 2006;38:617–27. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Coxon FP, et al. Protein geranylgeranylation is required for osteoclast formation, function, and survival: inhibition by bisphosphonates and GGTI-298. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000;15:1467–1476. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Henry DH, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:1125–1132. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sonpavde G, Sternberg CN. Contemporary management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2011;21:241–247. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283449e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sheedy K, Camara M, Camacho P. Comparison of the efficacy, adverse effects, and cost of zoledronic acid and denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr. Pract. 2015;21:275–279. doi: 10.4158/EP14106.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vuorimies I, Toiviainen-Salo S, Hero M, Mäkitie O. Zoledronic acid treatment in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2011;75:346–353. doi: 10.1159/000323368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hoyer-Kuhn H, et al. Safety and efficacy of denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfect–a first prospective trial. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2016;16:24–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karras NA, et al. Denosumab treatment of metastatic giant-cell tumor of bone in a 10-year-old girl. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:e200–e202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.4255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cornelis F, et al. Bisphosphonate therapy for unresectable symptomatic benign bone tumors: a long-term prospective study of tolerance and efficacy. Bone. 2014;58:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bachrach LK, Ward LM. Clinical review: Bisphosphonate use in childhood osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;94:400–409. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ooi HL, Briody J, Biggin A, Cowell CT, Munns CF. Intravenous zoledronic acid given every 6 months in childhood osteoporosis. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2013;80:179–184. doi: 10.1159/000354303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.August KJ, et al. The use of zoledronic acid in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 2011;56:610–614. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marini JC. Use of bisphosphonates in children—proceed with caution. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2009;5:241–243. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Setsu N, et al. Severe hypercalcemia following denosumab treatment in a juvenile patient. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2016;34:118–122. doi: 10.1007/s00774-015-0677-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tucker A, Sharpe P. The cutting-edge of mammalian development; how the embryo makes teeth. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004;5:499–508. doi: 10.1038/nrg1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Katsimbri P. The biology of normal bone remodelling. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26:e12740. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kong YY, et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397:315–323. doi: 10.1038/16852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lézot F, et al. Preclinical evidence of potential craniofacial adverse effect of zoledronic acid in pediatric patients with bone malignancies. Bone. 2014;68:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lézot F, et al. Skeletal consequences of RANKL-blocking antibody (IK22-5) injections during growth: mouse strain disparities and synergic effect with zoledronic acid. Bone. 2015;73:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Furuya Y, et al. Increased bone mass in mice after single injection of anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand-neutralizing antibody: evidence for bone anabolic effect of parathyroid hormone in mice with few osteoclasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:37023–37031. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.246280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yajima A, Inaba M, Tominaga Y, Ito A. Minimodeling reduces the rate of cortical bone loss in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2007;49:440–451. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Villanueva AR, Lundin KD. A versatile new mineralized bone stain for simultaneous assessment of tetracycline and osteoid seams. Stain Technol. 1989;64:129–138. doi: 10.3109/10520298909106985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Federman N, et al. Giant cell tumor of bone in childhood: clinical aspects and novel therapeutic targets. Pediatr. Drugs. 2014;16:21–28. doi: 10.1007/s40272-013-0051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Piperno-Neumann S, et al. Zoledronate in combination with chemotherapy and surgery to treat osteosarcoma (OS2006): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1070–1080. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bone HG, et al. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:972–980. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shiraki M, Tanaka S, Suzuki H, Ueda S, Nakamura T. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and changes in bone metabolism associated with zoledronic acid treatment in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2017;35:675–684. doi: 10.1007/s00774-016-0806-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pan B, et al. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, increases mineralisation of human bone-derived cells in vitro. Bone. 2004;34:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Battaglia S, et al. Impact of oncopediatric dosing regimen of zoledronic acid on bone growth: Preclinical studies and case report of an osteosarcoma pediatric patient. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:2439–2451. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dieterle F, et al. Application of metabonomics in a comparative profiling study reveals N-acetylfelinine excretion as a biomarker for inhibition of the farnesyl pathway by bisphosphonates. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2007;20:1291–1299. doi: 10.1021/tx700151t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lu Y, et al. Hepatotoxicity induced by zoledronic acid in an aged woman with primary osteoporosis. EXCLI J. 2013;12:115–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stolina M, et al. Continuous RANKL inhibition in osteoprotegerin transgenic mice and rats suppresses bone resorption without impairing lymphorganogenesis or functional immune responses. J. Immunol. 2007;179:7497–7505. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.11.7497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rogers MJ, Crockett JC, Coxon FP, Mönkkönen J. Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates. Bone. 2011;49:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vermeer J, et al. Bone-site-specific responses to zoledronic acid. Oral Dis. 2017;23:126–133. doi: 10.1111/odi.12587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stark Z, Savarirayan R. Review Osteopetrosis. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2009;12:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smith EJ, et al. Transient disturbance in physeal morphology is associated with long-term effects of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates in growing rabbits. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:1731–1741. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Marks SC, Cahill DR. Experimental study in the dog of the non-active role of the tooth in the eruptive process. Arch. Oral Biol. 1984;29:311–322. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(84)90105-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wise GE, Marks SC, Cahill DR. Ultrastructural features of the dental follicle associated with formation of the tooth eruption pathway in the dog. J. Oral Pathol. 1985;14:15–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1985.tb00461.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Suzuki T, Suda N, Ohyama K. Osteoclastogenesis during mouse tooth germ development is mediated by receptor activator of NF kappa-B ligand (RANKL) J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2004;22:185–191. doi: 10.1007/s00774-003-0481-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wise GE, Yao S. Regional differences of expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and RANKL in the rat dental follicle. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2006;114:512–516. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wise GE, King GJ. Mechanisms of tooth eruption and orthodontic tooth movement. J. Dent. Res. 2008;87:414–434. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wise GE, Lumpkin SJ, Huang H, Zhang Q. Osteoprotegerin and osteoclast differentiation factor in tooth eruption. J. Dent. Res. 2000;79:1937–1942. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790120301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kamoun-Goldrat A, Ginisty D, Le Merrer M. Effects of bisphosphonates on tooth eruption in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2008;116:195–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hernandez M, Phulpin B, Mansuy L, Droz D. Use of new targeted cancer therapies in children: effects on dental development and risk of jaw osteonecrosis: a review. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2017;46:321–326. doi: 10.1111/jop.12516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sicher H. Tooth eruption: axial movement of teeth with limited growth. J. Dent. Res. 1942;21:395–402. doi: 10.1177/00220345420210040901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wise G. Cellular and molecular basis of tooth eruption. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2009;12:67–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01439.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Takahashi A, et al. Autocrine regulation of mesenchymal progenitor cell fates orchestrates tooth eruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:575–580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810200115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lungová V, et al. Tooth-bone morphogenesis during postnatal stages of mouse first molar development. J. Anat. 2011;218:699–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01367.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Leonardi M, Armi P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Caltabiano M. Mandibular growth in subjects with infraoccluded deciduous molars: A superimposition study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:927–934. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[927:MGISWI]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nishikawa K, et al. Maf promotes osteoblast differentiation in mice by mediating the age-related switch in mesenchymal cell differentiation. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:3455–3465. doi: 10.1172/JCI42528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chiang CY, Kyritsis G, Graves DT, Amar S. Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor activities partially account for calvarial bone resorption induced by local injection of lipopolysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:4231–4236. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.8.4231-4236.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim S, et al. Stat1 functions as a cytoplasmic attenuator of Runx2 in the transcriptional program of osteoblast differentiation. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1979–1991. doi: 10.1101/gad.1119303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yajima A, Inaba M, Tominaga Y, Ito A. Bone formation by minimodeling is more active than remodeling after parathyroidectomy. Kidney Int. 2008;74:775–781. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.