Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurochem Res. 2019 Jun 28;45(1):100–108. doi: 10.1007/s11064-019-02834-0

Astrocytic Endocannabinoids Mediate Hippocampal Transient Heterosynaptic Depression

Nathan A Smith 1,2,3, Lane K Bekar 4, Maiken Nedergaard 1
PMCID: PMC6934934  NIHMSID: NIHMS1043004  PMID: 31254249

Abstract

Astrocytes are highly dynamic cells that modulate synaptic transmission within a temporal domain of seconds to minutes in physiological contexts such as Long-Term Potentiation (LTP) and Heterosynaptic Depression (HSD). Recent studies have revealed that astrocytes also modulate a faster form of synaptic activity (milliseconds to seconds) known as Transient Heterosynaptic Depression (tHSD). However, the mechanism underlying astrocytic modulation of tHSD is not fully understood. Are the traditional gliotransmitters ATP or glutamate released via hemichannels/vesicles or are other, yet, unexplored pathways involved? Using various approaches to manipulate astrocytes, including the Krebs cycle inhibitor fluoroacetate, connexin 43/30 double knockout mice (hemichannels), and inositol triphosphate type-2 receptor knockout mice, we confirmed early reports demonstrating that astrocytes are critical for tHSD. We also confirmed the importance of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in astrocytic modulation of tHSD using a group II agonist. Using dominant negative SNARE mice, which have disrupted glial vesicle function, we also found that vesicular release of gliotransmitters and activation of adenosine A1 receptors are not required for tHSD. As astrocytes can release lipids upon receptor stimulation, we asked if astrocyte-derived endocannabinoids are involved in tHSD. Interestingly, a cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) antagonist blocked and an inhibitor of the endogenous endocannabinoid 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) degradation potentiates tHSD in hippocampal slices. Taken together, this study provides the first evidence for group II mGluR-mediated astrocytic endocannabinoids in transiently suppressing presynaptic neurotransmitter release associated with the phenomenon of tHSD.

Keywords: endocannabinoids, astrocytes, transient heterosynaptic depression

Introduction

Over the last few decades, astrocytes have gained recognition as being active participants in synaptic activity rather than mere bystanders with a role in metabolic support. Previous studies have shown that astrocyte receptor-mediated Ca2+ increases lead to release of ‘gliotransmitters’ such as glutamate (Parpura et al., 1994; Bezzi et al., 1998; Kang et al., 1998), D-serine (Mothet et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2003), or ATP (Coco et al., 2003). Gliotransmission is thought to be critical in calcium wave propagation by ATP-dependent astrocytic paracrine signaling (Cotrina et al., 1998; Guthrie et al., 1999), and may also modulate synaptic activity by signaling to neurons (Kang et al., 1998; Mothet et al., 2005; Verkhratsky and Nedergaard, 2018). However, the extent of and the circumstances under which gliotransmitters modulate synaptic activity is still under debate (Agulhon et al., 2010; Hamilton and Attwell, 2010; Nedergaard and Verkhratsky, 2012; Verkhratsky and Nedergaard, 2018).

Transient (<1 second) post-burst depression of transmitter release, often termed tHSD, is a rapid form of intersynaptic communication in which an active synapse transiently decreases the efficacy of a neighboring inactive synapse (Andersson et al., 2007). Although the role of astrocytes in tHSD, is well-established (Andersson et al., 2007; Andersson and Hanse, 2010; Andersson and Hanse, 2011), details surrounding ‘gliotransmission’ remain ambiguous. Andersson et al. (2007) describe a role for astrocytes, GABAB receptors, and group II/III mGluRs in tHSD, and propose a model whereby glutamate- and/or GABA-induced astrocyte glutamate release is responsible for the synaptic suppression. However, evidence for astrocyte-derived glutamate release is not provided, leaving the mechanistic role of astrocytes yet to be characterized. More recently, Andersson and Hanse (2010) go on to demonstrate that disruption of astrocyte Ca2+ via patch pipette delivery of the calcium chelator BAPTA completely abolished tHSD but note that the mechanism responsible for synaptic depression remains to be determined. In this study, we explore endocannabinoids, known for their role in inhibition of presynaptic neurotransmitter release (Szabo et al., 2006), as a candidate mechanism for astrocyte-mediated induction of tHSD.

Although astrocytes have been shown to release endocannabinoids in a calcium-dependent manner (Walter and Stella, 2003; Stella, 2004; Walter et al., 2004), there is some evidence that endocannabinoids can also undergo calcium-independent release (Dinh et al., 2002b; Sugiura et al., 2002; Bisogno et al., 2003). In this study, we demonstrate that tHSD is dependent on group II mGluR receptor-mediated astrocyte calcium using select pharmacology and inositol triphosphate type-2 receptor knock-out mice (IP3R2−/−) where astrocyte calcium signaling is disrupted. Furthermore, using dnSNARE or double connexin knockout mice we demonstrate that tHSD is not dependent on the traditional slow gliotransmitter release mechanisms involving vesicular exocytosis or hemichannel opening, respectively. Finally, we demonstrate that the transient suppression of synaptic activity is lost in the presence of a type-1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1) antagonist and potentiated when metabolism of the endogenous cannabinoid 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) is inhibited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Connexin 43/30−/− mice were bred as described previously (Wallraff et al., 2006), along with homozygotic knockout mice and their wildtype littermates. IP3R2−/− mice were generated as described previously (Sharp et al., 1999; Holtzclaw et al., 2002; Hertle and Yeckel, 2007), and dominant negative SNARE mice were bred as described previously (Pascual et al., 2005), which were used with and without doxycycline (DOX) treatment. C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. All studies were conducted with animals aged 18 to 30 days. The Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Rochester approved all animal experiments.

Slice preparation

Hippocampal slices were prepared from C57BL/6J mice. After decapitation under deep anesthesia with isoflurane, brains were quickly removed to oxygenated, ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM) 230 sucrose, 1 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 10 MgSO4, 0.04 sodium ascorbate, 1 kynurenic acid, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 glucose. Transverse hippocampal slices 400 μm thick were cut into this solution with a vibratome and transferred to oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) that contained (in mM) 124 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl, 2 MgSO4, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4 and 10 glucose. Slices were kept at 30–32 °C in ACSF saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. During the recordings, slices were placed in a perfusion chamber and superfused at a rate of 2 ml/min with ACSF saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 at 30–32 °C. Picrotoxin (100 μM) was always present in the perfusion fluid to block GABAA receptor-mediated activity.

Electrophysiological Recording and Analysis

Electrical stimulation of Schaffer collateral-commissural axons and recording of synaptic responses were carried out in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region. Stimuli consisted of biphasic constant current pulses (Master 8, AMPI, Israel) delivered through tungsten wires (~0.1 MΩ). A pair of stimulation electrodes was positioned in the stratum radiatum at a separation of about 500 μm and were activated every 10 s with the duration of the activation between the inputs being 5s (long interval) or 0.5s (short intervals) (Figure 1A). One input was used as a test input while the other was used as a conditioning input and activated using a 3-pulse train at 50 Hz. Test stimuli were compared under the two conditions, long and short-intervals, to measure the extent of synaptic suppression. The long-interval was used as control, while the short interval was used to induces tHSD. Field evoked post-synaptic potentials (EPSPs) were recorded using a glass micropipette filled with 1 M NaCl (resistance 1–2 MΩ) placed between the two stimulation electrodes. The field EPSPs were sampled at 10 kHz with an AxoPatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instrument) and filtered at 1 kHz. Evoked responses were analyzed off-line using pClamp 10 (Molecular Devices). Data analyzed were the peak amplitude of the baseline fEPSPs and of the fEPSPs evoked after application of the conditioning pulses. fEPSP amplitudes were expressed as percentage of baseline values to control for differences in absolute magnitude across slices and conditions.

Figure 1: Astrocytes are necessary for tHSD.

Figure 1:

A.) A schematic illustration showing the placement of stimulating electrodes for conditioning and testing in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region. tHSD is induced by stimulating one group of synapses with a short burst (3 pulses at 50Hz: conditional stimulation), which elicits a depression of fEPSPs at another synapse stimulatied by a test stimulation at a short interval of 0.5s. Lower panel illustrates depression of the test fEPSP during tHSD. B.) Bar graph comparing tHSD before and after exposure to the astrocytic toxin fluoroacetate (10 mM) (FAC) in hippocampal slices from wild-type mice (*P<0.05, unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney post-hoc). C.) Bar graph comparing tHSD in Connexin 43/30+/+ and Connexin 43/30−/− mouse hippocampal slices (*P<0.05, unpaired t-test). D.) Application of ATP (100 μM) failed to increase Ca2+ release in Rhod-2AM (4.5 μM) loaded slices prepared from IP3R2−/− mice (left panel), whereas ATP (100 μM) induced increased Ca2+ release in a slice prepared from IP3R2+/+ mice. Lower panel, Bar graph comparing tHSD in IP3R2+/+ and IP3R2−/− mice hippocampal slices (**P<0.001, unpaired t-test). Displayed are means ± S.E.M.

Pharmacological agents used in slice experiments

Slice studies were undertaken with the addition to the medium of: adenosine 5’-triphosphate (ATP, 100 μM); trans- (1S, 3R)-1-amino-1, 3-cyclopentanedicarboxylic acid (t-ACPD, 100 μM); (2S)-2-amino-2-[(1S,2S)-2-carboxycycloprop-1-yl]-3-(xanth-9-yl) propanoic acid disodium salt (LY341495 20 μM, Tocris); N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4 methyl-1H-pyrazole-carboxamide (AM251, 4 μM, Tocris); 4-[bis(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)hydroxymethyl]-1-piperidinecarboxylic acid 4-nitrophenyl ester (JZL184, 1 μM, Tocris); 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 1 μM, Tocris) and rhod-2 AM (4.5 mM, Invitrogen). All chemicals were from Sigma unless otherwise noted.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Normality of the data was evaluated with Shapiro-Wilk test with a = 0.05. Differences between two means were assessed by Student’s test (unpaired and unpaired; Mann-Whitney post-hoc test) and multiple means were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc test. Statistical significance (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001) were calculated using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, Ca).

RESULTS

Astrocytes are necessary for tHSD

Using the stimulation protocol necessary to induce tHSD (Figure 1A), we first tested the previous finding that fluoroacetate (FAC), which inhibits astrocytic metabolism (Fonnum et al., 1997), blocks tHSD. We observed a 25–30% suppression with tHSD under control conditions, which was reduced to a 5% suppression with the addition of FAC (10 mM) to the ACSF (Figure 1B, n=4), thus confirming previous findings. To further test the role of astrocytes in tHSD, we assessed tHSD in separate experiments in brain slices prepared from connexin 43/30 (gap junctions specific to astrocytes) double knockout mice (Wallraff et al., 2006). These animals are conditional knockouts that have connexin43 specifically ablated in astrocytes, driven by inactivation of floxed Cx43 by Cre recombinase. The human GFAP promoter drives the expression in the conditional KO mice, while Cx30 is a global KO (Theis et al., 2003; Wallraff et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2008). tHSD was significantly attenuated in hippocampal slices prepared from connexin 43/30−/− mice compared to WT mice (Figure 1C, n= 8), thus confirming previous findings that used pharmacological methods to disrupt gap junction connexin function (Andersson et al., 2007). Although significant, the attenuation of tHSD in knockout mice was far from complete. As Ca2+ is critical for release of gliotransmitters, the observed inhibition in the connexin knockout may be a result of reduced Ca2+ wave propagation and signaling (Naus et al., 1997; Scemes et al., 1998) as opposed to removal of a potential gliotransmission pathway.

To examine the role of intracellular Ca2+ in tHSD, we undertook tHSD studies in hippocampal slices prepared from IP3R2−/− mice, in which the astrocytic isoform of the intracellular IP3 receptors are ablated as a consequence of global deletion of IP3R2 (Sharp et al., 1999; Holtzclaw et al., 2002; Hertle and Yeckel, 2007). Astrocytes from these mice are thus unable to respond with rises in intracellular Ca2+ upon IP3 receptor stimulation. Consistent with previous studies (Li et al., 2005; Petravicz et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012), we observed that ATP-mediated increases in intracellular Ca2+ in slices from wildtype mice (IP3R2+/+) did not occur in slices from IP3R2−/− mice (Figure 1D, upper panel). Interestingly, tHSD was largely inhibited in the IP3R2−/− mice but remained intact in the wildtype mice (Figure 1D, n=4–6), thus supporting the notion that astrocytic Ca2+ signaling plays an essential role in tHSD.

Group II mGluRs are necessary for tHSD

We assessed effects of direct activation of group II mGluR on synaptic activity in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region by pressure ejection of trans-1-amino cylopentane-1, 3-dicarboxylic acid (tACPD), a specific group II mGluR agonist (Figure 2A left panel). Application of 50 μM tACPD evoked a significant depression of synaptic activity (Figure 2B, n=6). Because local application of tACPD could potentially activate neuronal mGluRs (Pacelli and Kelso, 1991), we next employed electrical stimulation with a selective antagonist in order to reveal the role of group II mGluRs activated by endogenous glutamate on tHSD (Figure 2A right panel). In the presence of 20 μM LY341495, a specific antagonist for group II mGluR, we observed blockade of tHSD (Figure 2B, n=6), thus confirming previous findings (Andersson et al., 2007). Notably, there was no effect on baseline field potentials, indicating that blockage of group II mGluR does not inhibit basic synaptic transmission.

Figure 2: Group II mGluR activation is necessary for tHSD.

Figure 2:

A.) A schematic illustration that shows the placement of picospritzer and test stimulating electrode in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region. This experimental approach induced depression of fEPSP at local synapses (test stimulation) upon picospritzing 50μM of tACPD, a group II mGluR agonist. (right panel) A schematic illustration showing the placement of stimulating electrodes for conditioning and testing in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 region. tHSD is induced by stimulating one group of synapses with a short burst (three pulses at 50 Hz, with conditional stimulation at 0.5 or 5 seconds prior to test stimulation), which elicits depression of fEPSP at another group of synapses (test stimulation). B.) Bar graph comparing local application via picospritzer of tACPD-mediated depression to electrical evoked tHSD before and after exposure to the mGluR group II antagonist LY341495 (20 μM), in wild-type mouse hippocampal slices (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc test). Displayed are means ± S.E.M.

Astrocytic vesicular release is not involved in Group II mGluR-mediated tHSD

We investigated the possible mechanism behind group II mGluR-mediated tHSD in SNARE mice (Figure 3A). We performed a beta galactosidase (β-Gal) expression assay to confirm the appropriate expression profile of the dominant negative SNARE protein. In the presence of DOX, there was no β-Gal expression, indicating that the functional snare proteins were expressed (Figure 3A, right panel top), whereas in the absence of DOX, β-Gal expression was evident (Figure 3A, right panel bottom). In the dominant negative mice with disrupted vesicular trafficking, tHSD was still present, suggesting that vesicular release of gliotransmitters is not essential for tHSD (Figure 3A, n=6). Furthermore, we induced normal tHSD despite blockade with 8-cyclopentyl-1, 3, dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 1 μM), an antagonist of the adenosine A1 receptors, which are known to be important in non-transient heterosynaptic depression (Grover and Teyler, 1993) (Figure 3B, n= 4).

Figure 3: Astrocytic vesicular release is not involved in Group II mGluR mediated tHSD.

Figure 3:

A.) Bar graph comparing tHSD in hippocampal slices of dnSNARE mice treated with and without the inducer doxycycline (DOX) (P = 0.4177, unpaired t-test, Mann Whitney post-hoc test). Right panel, image of X-Gal staining of brain tissue from dnSNARE mice with or without doxycycline (DOX) treatment. B.) Bar graph comparing tHSD in wild type mouse hippocampal slices before and after the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX (1 μM). (P = 0.4286, paired t-test, Mann Whitney post-hoc test). Displayed are means ± S.E.M.

CB1R antagonists block Group II mGluR-mediated tHSD

Endocannabinoids can inhibit neurotransmitter release by activating CB1R on presynaptic terminals. In the presence of the CB1R antagonist AM251 (4 μM), tHSD was significantly depressed (Figure 4A, n=6). To further establish the role of the CB1R in mGluR-induced astrocyte-mediated synaptic depression we pressure ejected tACPD with or without slice perfusion with AM251 for comparison. AM251 demonstrated a near complete block of tACPD-mediated synaptic depression that was reversible with washout (Figure 4B, n=5–7) supporting the notion that group II mGluRs do not directly mediate the suppression on the pre-synapse. To identify the specific endocannabinoid involved, we applied JZL184, a specific inhibitor of monoacyl glycerol lipase (MGL), which inactivates 2-AG (Dinh et al., 2002b; Dinh et al., 2002a). Treatment of the slice with JZL184 (1 μM) resulted in a significantly enhanced tHSD (Figure 4C, n=6), endorsing the role of 2-AG. Data presented here provide strong evidence for astrocytic group II mGluR-induced release of 2-AG in modulating tHSD (Figure 4D).

Figure 4: CB1R antagonist blocks Group II mGluR-mediated tHSD.

Figure 4:

A.) Bar graph comparing tHSD before and after exposure to the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (4 μM) in wild-type mouse hippocampal slices (***P<0.0001, unpaired t-test). B.) Bar graph comparing the effects of group II mGluR agonist mediated depression before and after AM251 exposure in wild-type mice hippocampal slices (**P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc test). C.) Bar graph comparing tHSD before and after exposure to the MGL inhibitor JZL184 (1 μM) (**P<0.001, unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney post-hoc). D.) Schematic illustration of one active synapse (glutamatergic) and one inactive synapse (glutamatergic) with an interposed astrocyte endfoot. The astrocyte presents Group II mGluRs, activation of which can increase intracellular Ca2+ release leading to the production of 2AG. This in turn activates CB1Rs on nearby presynaptic terminals, resulting in decreased release of vesicular glutamate. Displayed are means ± S.E.M.

DISCUSSION

Although there is a well-established role for astrocytes in tHSD, our understanding of the exact mechanism by which they modulate this depression remains incomplete (Andersson et al., 2007; Andersson and Hanse, 2010; Andersson and Hanse, 2011). Previous work proposed that activation of group II mGluR causes release of glutamate from astrocytes, which in turn activates presynaptic neuronal group II mGluRs, inducing tHSD (Andersson et al., 2007). This was an attractive hypothesis as glutamate, indeed, inhibits neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals by activating group II mGluR in various brain regions (Bushell et al., 1996; Glitsch et al., 1996; Macek et al., 1996; Yokoi et al., 1996; Scanziani et al., 1997; Dube and Marshall, 2000; Kew et al., 2001). However, based on autoradiography and histological studies, the majority of group II mGluR expression is localized to astrocytic processes rather than presynaptic neuronal terminals within the CA1 stratum radiatum region of the hippocampus (Poncer et al., 1995; Petralia et al., 1996; Tamaru et al., 2001; Sun et al., 2013), limiting the possibility for neuronal group II mGluR participation in tHSD. We validate and extend previous studies on tHSD by demonstrating for the first time an additional step involving astrocyte-dependent release of endocannabinoids. The fact that the CB1R antagonist also blocked the exogenous group II mGluR agonist in this study is consistent with group II mGluRs not being involved at the pre-synapse. This begs the question, how many studies showing group II mGluR-mediated reduction in neurotransmitter release can be attributed to astrocyte mGluR-mediated release of endocannabinoids?

The group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) family consists of mGluR2 and mGluR3, which are Gi-coupled receptors that negatively regulate adenylate cyclase (Pin and Duvoisin, 1995). The most prominent metabotropic glutamate receptors found in astrocytes are mGluR3 and mGluR5 (Testa et al., 1994; Petralia et al., 1996; Balazs et al., 1997; Sun et al., 2013). The main focus has been placed on studies of the astrocytic mGluR5, since it is a Gq-coupled receptor directly linked to polyphosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, and is known to stimulate intracellular Ca2+ increases (Nakahara et al., 1997). However, Gi-coupled receptors such as mGluR3 can also provoke rises in intracellular Ca2+ (Tang et al., 2015; Chai et al., 2017), which may be due to cross talk with Gq receptors (Werry et al., 2003) or through the βγ subunit (Taussig and Zimmermann, 1998). A recent study revealed that these receptor types undergo developmental regulation in astrocytes whereby mGluR5 is down-regulated with age, while mGluR3 persists throughout adulthood (Sun et al., 2013). In addition, anatomical studies localize the majority of mGluR3 expression seen in the hippocampal CA1 region to astrocytic processes (Petralia et al., 1996; Tamaru et al., 2001). Furthermore, hippocampal astrocytes associated with synaptic terminals in the CA1 region respond to neuronal release of glutamate (Tang et al., 2015), providing a possible mechanism for neuron/astrocyte communication.

Synaptobrevin 2 and syntaxin, which are core components of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors) complex, are expressed in astrocytes (Parpura et al., 1995). The dominant negative SNARE mice are conditional knockouts that express a disrupted synaptobrevin 2 protein in astrocytes when the animals are withdrawn from doxycycline (DOX), thus blocking astrocytic vesicular transmitter release (Pascual et al., 2005). However, it is worth noting that the dnSNARE transgene has some expression in cortical neurons (Fujita et al., 2014). We here assessed β-Gal expression, but concede that this does not exclude neuronal expression, because the neuronal and glial transgenes operate separately, resulting in independent expression levels. Nevertheless, the present results, in conjunction with the adenosine A1 receptor blockade, do not indicate an important role of vesicular gliotransmitter (ATP) release in tHSD.

A few studies have shown that endocannabinoids are released from post-synaptic neuronal membranes in response to high frequency stimulation through the activation of NMDA receptors (Ohno-Shosaku et al., 2007), but astrocytes are also capable of releasing endocannabinoids in both a Ca2+-dependent and independent manner (Walter and Stella, 2003; Stella, 2004; Walter et al., 2004). Endocannabinoids are unique lipid modulators that suppress neuronal activity by acting on their receptors located on presynaptic terminals (Mechoulam et al., 1996; Stella et al., 1997; Di Marzo et al., 1998; Freund et al., 2003). Established endocannabinoid-mediated modulation of synaptic activity entails retrograde signaling of endocannabinoids from the postsynaptic neuronal membrane, which is only inducible by high frequency depolarization or direct activation of NMDA or mGluR1 receptors (Maejima et al., 2001; Ohno-Shosaku et al., 2001; Varma et al., 2001; Zhu, 2006). However, the possibility of retrograde neuronal signaling of endocannabinoids seems unlikely in the current study. First, tHSD is independent of NMDA receptor activation but dependent on astrocytic group II mGluR signaling (Andersson et al., 2007). Furthermore, establishing tHSD does not require the high frequency stimulation required for neuronal release of endocannabinoids (10 pulses at 100 Hz), but is evoked by the moderate physiological stimulation used in the present study (3 pulses at 50 Hz). An equally important consideration is that astrocytes can also release endocannabinoids upon receptor stimulation (Walter and Stella, 2003; Stella, 2004; Walter et al., 2004).

We initially thought that because tHSD occurs on a millisecond time-scale, and that a number of studies have demonstrated receptor-mediated increases in intracellular Ca2+ in astrocytes occurs on a time-scale of seconds (Cornell-Bell et al., 1990; Wang et al., 2006; Srinivasan et al., 2015), it could be due to Ca2+-independent release of astrocytic endocannabinoids. However, loss of tHSD with patch dialysis of a calcium chelator (Andersson and Hanse, 2010) as well as in the IP3R2−/− transgenic mice presented in these studies, supports involvement of astrocyte Ca2+ on a sub-second time-scale. It is worth noting that a recent study has shown that the IP3R2−/− mice are not completely devoid of Ca2+ signaling especially in their processes which could explain why we don’t see a complete abolishment of tHSD in these mice (Srinivasan et al., 2015). Equally important, several studies have shown that astrocytes can exhibit fast Ca2+ signaling, notably in relation to sub-second blood flow responses (Winship et al., 2007; Nimmerjahn et al., 2009; Lind et al., 2013), a time-frame consistent with that in the present study. Thus, these findings were significant because they provided first hand evidence of sub-second Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes that can potentially affect many CNS functions.

In conclusion, the present findings conceptually extend ‘gliotransmitter’ signaling to include the endocannabinoid system that can function on a sub-second time-scale. These are the first studies to present evidence for astrocytic lipid modulation of fast synaptic activity in the adult brain.

Acknowledgments:

We thank Dr. Ken McCarthy for generously sharing transgenic mice. National Institutes of Health Grants R01NS075177 to M.N. and T32NS051152 and F31NS073390 to N.A.S. supported this work. We thank P. Cumming, A. Thrane, and V. Rangoo-Thrane for comments and critical discussion for this manuscript and D. Xue for graphic illustrations. The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Agulhon C, Fiacco TA, McCarthy KD (2010) Hippocampal short- and long-term plasticity are not modulated by astrocyte Ca2+ signaling. Science 327:1250–1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson M, Hanse E (2010) Astrocytes impose postburst depression of release probability at hippocampal glutamate synapses. J Neurosci 30:5776–5780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson M, Blomstrand F, Hanse E (2007) Astrocytes play a critical role in transient heterosynaptic depression in the rat hippocampal CA1 region. J Physiol 585:843–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersson MS, Hanse E (2011) Astrocyte-mediated short-term synaptic depression in the rat hippocampal CA1 area: two modes of decreasing release probability. BMC Neurosci 12:87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balazs R, Miller S, Romano C, de Vries A, Chun Y, Cotman CW (1997) Metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 in astrocytes: pharmacological properties and agonist regulation. J Neurochem 69:151–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bezzi P, Carmignoto G, Pasti L, Vesce S, Rossi D, Rizzini BL, Pozzan T, Volterra A (1998) Prostaglandins stimulate calcium-dependent glutamate release in astrocytes. Nature 391:281–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bisogno T, Howell F, Williams G, Minassi A, Cascio MG, Ligresti A, Matias I, Schiano-Moriello A, Paul P, Williams EJ, Gangadharan U, Hobbs C, Di Marzo V, Doherty P (2003) Cloning of the first sn1-DAG lipases points to the spatial and temporal regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. J Cell Biol 163:463–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bushell TJ, Jane DE, Tse HW, Watkins JC, Garthwaite J, Collingridge GL (1996) Pharmacological antagonism of the actions of group II and III mGluR agonists in the lateral perforant path of rat hippocampal slices. Br J Pharmacol 117:1457–1462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chai H, Diaz-Castro B, Shigetomi E, Monte E, Octeau JC, Yu X, Cohn W, Rajendran PS, Vondriska TM, Whitelegge JP, Coppola G, Khakh BS (2017) Neural Circuit-Specialized Astrocytes: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, Morphological, and Functional Evidence. Neuron 95:531–549 e539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coco S, Calegari F, Pravettoni E, Pozzi D, Taverna E, Rosa P, Matteoli M, Verderio C (2003) Storage and release of ATP from astrocytes in culture. J Biol Chem 278:1354–1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornell-Bell AH, Finkbeiner SM, Cooper MS, Smith SJ (1990) Glutamate induces calcium waves in cultured astrocytes: long-range glial signaling. Science 247:470–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cotrina ML, Kang J, Lin JH, Bueno E, Hansen TW, He L, Liu Y, Nedergaard M (1998) Astrocytic gap junctions remain open during ischemic conditions. J Neurosci 18:2520–2537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Di Marzo V, Melck D, Bisogno T, De Petrocellis L (1998) Endocannabinoids: endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligands with neuromodulatory action. Trends Neurosci 21:521–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dinh TP, Freund TF, Piomelli D (2002a) A role for monoglyceride lipase in 2-arachidonoylglycerol inactivation. Chemistry and physics of lipids 121:149–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dinh TP, Carpenter D, Leslie FM, Freund TF, Katona I, Sensi SL, Kathuria S, Piomelli D (2002b) Brain monoglyceride lipase participating in endocannabinoid inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:10819–10824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dube GR, Marshall KC (2000) Activity-dependent activation of presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors in locus coeruleus. J Neurophysiol 83:1141–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fonnum F, Johnsen A, Hassel B (1997) Use of fluorocitrate and fluoroacetate in the study of brain metabolism. Glia 21:106–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Freund TF, Katona I, Piomelli D (2003) Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol Rev 83:1017–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fujita T, Chen MJ, Li B, Smith NA, Peng W, Sun W, Toner MJ, Kress BT, Wang L, Benraiss A, Takano T, Wang S, Nedergaard M (2014) Neuronal transgene expression in dominant-negative SNARE mice. J Neurosci 34:16594–16604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Glitsch M, Llano I, Marty A (1996) Glutamate as a candidate retrograde messenger at interneurone-Purkinje cell synapses of rat cerebellum. J Physiol 497 ( Pt 2):531–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grover LM, Teyler TJ (1993) Role of adenosine in heterosynaptic, posttetanic depression in area CA1 of hippocampus. Neurosci Lett 154:39–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guthrie PB, Knappenberger J, Segal M, Bennett MV, Charles AC, Kater SB (1999) ATP released from astrocytes mediates glial calcium waves. J Neurosci 19:520–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamilton NB, Attwell D (2010) Do astrocytes really exocytose neurotransmitters? Nat Rev Neurosci 11:227–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hertle DN, Yeckel MF (2007) Distribution of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isotypes and ryanodine receptor isotypes during maturation of the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 150:625–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Holtzclaw LA, Pandhit S, Bare DJ, Mignery GA, Russell JT (2002) Astrocytes in adult rat brain express type 2 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Glia 39:69–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang J, Jiang L, Goldman S, Nedergaard M (1998) Astrocyte-mediated potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission. Nat Neurosci 1:683–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kew JN, Ducarre JM, Pflimlin MC, Mutel V, Kemp JA (2001) Activity-dependent presynaptic autoinhibition by group II metabotropic glutamate receptors at the perforant path inputs to the dentate gyrus and CA1. Neuropharmacology 40:20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li X, Zima AV, Sheikh F, Blatter LA, Chen J (2005) Endothelin-1-induced arrhythmogenic Ca2+ signaling is abolished in atrial myocytes of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate(IP3)-receptor type 2-deficient mice. Circ Res 96:1274–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin JH, Lou N, Kang N, Takano T, Hu F, Han X, Xu Q, Lovatt D, Torres A, Willecke K, Yang J, Kang J, Nedergaard M (2008) A central role of connexin 43 in hypoxic preconditioning. J Neurosci 28:681–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lind BL, Brazhe AR, Jessen SB, Tan FC, Lauritzen MJ (2013) Rapid stimulus-evoked astrocyte Ca2+ elevations and hemodynamic responses in mouse somatosensory cortex in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E4678–4687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Macek TA, Winder DG, Gereau RWt, Ladd CO, Conn PJ (1996) Differential involvement of group II and group III mGluRs as autoreceptors at lateral and medial perforant path synapses. J Neurophysiol 76:3798–3806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maejima T, Ohno-Shosaku T, Kano M (2001) Endogenous cannabinoid as a retrograde messenger from depolarized postsynaptic neurons to presynaptic terminals. Neurosci Res 40:205–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mechoulam R, Ben Shabat S, Hanus L, Fride E, Vogel Z, Bayewitch M, Sulcova AE (1996) Endogenous cannabinoid ligands--chemical and biological studies. Journal of lipid mediators and cell signalling 14:45–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mothet J, Parent A, Wolosker H, Jr RB, Linden D, Ferris C, Rogawski M, Synder S (2000) D-serine is an endogenous ligand for the site of N-methyl D-aspartate receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4926–4931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mothet JP, Pollegioni L, Ouanounou G, Martineau M, Fossier P, Baux G (2005) Glutamate receptor activation triggers a calcium-dependent and SNARE protein-dependent release of the gliotransmitter D-serine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5606–5611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakahara K, Okada M, Nakanishi S (1997) The metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 induces calcium oscillations in cultured astrocytes via protein kinase C phosphorylation. J Neurochem 69:1467–1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Naus CC, Bechberger JF, Zhang Y, Venance L, Yamasaki H, Juneja SC, Kidder GM, Giaume C (1997) Altered gap junctional communication, intercellular signaling, and growth in cultured astrocytes deficient in connexin43. J Neurosci Res 49:528–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nedergaard M, Verkhratsky A (2012) Artifact versus reality-How astrocytes contribute to synaptic events? Glia. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nimmerjahn A, Mukamel EA, Schnitzer MJ (2009) Motor behavior activates Bergmann glial networks. Neuron 62:400–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ohno-Shosaku T, Maejima T, Kano M (2001) Endogenous cannabinoids mediate retrograde signals from depolarized postsynaptic neurons to presynaptic terminals. Neuron 29:729–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ohno-Shosaku T, Hashimotodani Y, Ano M, Takeda S, Tsubokawa H, Kano M (2007) Endocannabinoid signalling triggered by NMDA receptor-mediated calcium entry into rat hippocampal neurons. J Physiol 584:407–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pacelli GJ, Kelso SR (1991) Trans-ACPD reduces multiple components of synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett 132:267–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Parpura V, Fang Y, Basarsky T, Jahn R, Haydon PG (1995) Expression of synaptobrevin II, cellubrevin and syntaxin but not SNAP-25 in cultured astrocytes. FEBS Lett 377:489–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Parpura V, Basarsky TA, Liu F, Jeftinija K, Jeftinija S, Haydon PG (1994) Glutamate-mediated astrocyte-neuron signalling. Nature 369:744–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pascual O, Casper KB, Kubera C, Zhang J, Revilla-Sanchez R, Sul JY, Takano H, Moss SJ, McCarthy K, Haydon PG (2005) Astrocytic purinergic signaling coordinates synaptic networks. Science 310:113–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Petralia RS, Wang YX, Niedzielski AS, Wenthold RJ (1996) The metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR2 and mGluR3, show unique postsynaptic, presynaptic and glial localizations. Neuroscience 71:949–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Petravicz J, Fiacco TA, McCarthy KD (2008) Loss of IP3 receptor-dependent Ca2+ increases in hippocampal astrocytes does not affect baseline CA1 pyramidal neuron synaptic activity. J Neurosci 28:4967–4973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pin JP, Duvoisin R (1995) The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure and functions. Neuropharmacology 34:1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Poncer JC, Shinozaki H, Miles R (1995) Dual modulation of synaptic inhibition by distinct metabotropic glutamate receptors in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 485 ( Pt 1):121–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Scanziani M, Salin PA, Vogt KE, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA (1997) Use-dependent increases in glutamate concentration activate presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nature 385:630–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Scemes E, Dermietzel R, Spray DC (1998) Calcium waves between astrocytes from Cx43 knockout mice. Glia 24:65–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sharp AH, Nucifora FC Jr., Blondel O, Sheppard CA, Zhang C, Snyder SH, Russell JT, Ryugo DK, Ross CA (1999) Differential cellular expression of isoforms of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptors in neurons and glia in brain. J Comp Neurol 406:207–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Srinivasan R, Huang BS, Venugopal S, Johnston AD, Chai H, Zeng H, Golshani P, Khakh BS (2015) Ca(2+) signaling in astrocytes from Ip3r2(−/−) mice in brain slices and during startle responses in vivo. Nat Neurosci 18:708–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stella N (2004) Cannabinoid signaling in glial cells. Glia 48:267–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stella N, Schweitzer P, Piomelli D (1997) A second endogenous cannabinoid that modulates long-term potentiation. Nature 388:773–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sugiura T, Kobayashi Y, Oka S, Waku K (2002) Biosynthesis and degradation of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol and their possible physiological significance. Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids 66:173–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sun W, McConnell E, Pare JF, Xu Q, Chen M, Peng W, Lovatt D, Han X, Smith Y, Nedergaard M (2013) Glutamate-dependent neuroglial calcium signaling differs between young and adult brain. Science 339:197–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Szabo B, Urbanski MJ, Bisogno T, Di Marzo V, Mendiguren A, Baer WU, Freiman I (2006) Depolarization-induced retrograde synaptic inhibition in the mouse cerebellar cortex is mediated by 2-arachidonoylglycerol. J Physiol 577:263–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tamaru Y, Nomura S, Mizuno N, Shigemoto R (2001) Distribution of metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR3 in the mouse CNS: differential location relative to pre- and postsynaptic sites. Neuroscience 106:481–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tang W, Szokol K, Jensen V, Enger R, Trivedi CA, Hvalby O, Helm PJ, Looger LL, Sprengel R, Nagelhus EA (2015) Stimulation-evoked Ca2+ signals in astrocytic processes at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses of adult mice are modulated by glutamate and ATP. J Neurosci 35:3016–3021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Taussig R, Zimmermann G (1998) Type-specific regulation of mammalian adenylyl cyclases by G protein pathways. Advances in second messenger and phosphoprotein research 32:81–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Testa CM, Standaert DG, Young AB, Penney JB Jr. (1994) Metabotropic glutamate receptor mRNA expression in the basal ganglia of the rat. J Neurosci 14:3005–3018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Theis M, Jauch R, Zhuo L, Speidel D, Wallraff A, Doring B, Frisch C, Sohl G, Teubner B, Euwens C, Huston J, Steinhauser C, Messing A, Heinemann U, Willecke K (2003) Accelerated hippocampal spreading depression and enhanced locomotory activity in mice with astrocyte-directed inactivation of connexin43. J Neurosci 23:766–776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Varma N, Carlson GC, Ledent C, Alger BE (2001) Metabotropic glutamate receptors drive the endocannabinoid system in hippocampus. J Neurosci 21:RC188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Verkhratsky A, Nedergaard M (2018) Physiology of Astroglia. Physiol Rev 98:239–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wallraff A, Kohling R, Heinemann U, Theis M, Willecke K, Steinhauser C (2006) The impact of astrocytic gap junctional coupling on potassium buffering in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 26:5438–5447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Walter L, Stella N (2003) Endothelin-1 increases 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) production in astrocytes. Glia 44:85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Walter L, Dinh T, Stella N (2004) ATP induces a rapid and pronounced increase in 2-arachidonoylglycerol production by astrocytes, a response limited by monoacylglycerol lipase. J Neurosci 24:8068–8074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang F, Smith NA, Xu Q, Fujita T, Baba A, Matsuda T, Takano T, Bekar L, Nedergaard M (2012) Astrocytes modulate neural network activity by Ca(2)(+)-dependent uptake of extracellular K(+). Science signaling 5:ra26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang X, Lou N, Xu Q, Tian GF, Peng WG, Han X, Kang J, Takano T, Nedergaard M (2006) Astrocytic Ca2+ signaling evoked by sensory stimulation in vivo. Nat Neurosci 9:816–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Werry TD, Wilkinson GF, Willars GB (2003) Mechanisms of cross-talk between G-protein-coupled receptors resulting in enhanced release of intracellular Ca2+. Biochem J 374:281–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Winship IR, Plaa N, Murphy TH (2007) Rapid astrocyte calcium signals correlate with neuronal activity and onset of the hemodynamic response in vivo. J Neurosci 27:6268–6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yang Y, Ge W, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Shen W, Wu C, Poo M, Duan S (2003) Contribution of astrocytes to hippocampal long-term potentiation through release of D-serine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15194–15199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Yokoi M, Kobayashi K, Manabe T, Takahashi T, Sakaguchi I, Katsuura G, Shigemoto R, Ohishi H, Nomura S, Nakamura K, Nakao K, Katsuki M, Nakanishi S (1996) Impairment of hippocampal mossy fiber LTD in mice lacking mGluR2. Science 273:645–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhu PJ (2006) Endocannabinoid signaling and synaptic plasticity in the brain. Crit Rev Neurobiol 18:113–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES