Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2019 Dec 23;58(1):e00677-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00677-19

The Brief Case: Rat Bite Fever from a Kiss

Kyle G Rodino a,#, Nathaniel E Miller b,#, Kirsten D Pethan c, Daniel C DeSimone d,e, Audrey N Schuetz a,d,
Editor: Carey-Ann D Burnhamf
PMCID: PMC6935932  PMID: 31871056

CASE

A 20-year-old otherwise healthy male presented to his primary care clinic with a 1-week history of fevers, rash, and polyarthralgias affecting his knees, elbows, and wrists that began 5 days following an acute diarrheal illness. In the clinic he was febrile to 38.5°C with a petechial rash initially on the palms and soles, which then spread to his trunk. The examination was also notable for cervical lymphadenopathy, two tongue ulcerations with clean bases, and the absence of joint effusion. Testing for influenza virus was negative, and the patient was sent home with a preliminary diagnosis of a nonspecific viral illness.

Subsequently, the patient’s malaise and migratory arthralgias worsened, resulting in ambulation difficulties, and so he presented to the Emergency Department. He continued to complain of low-grade fevers and rash with intermittent headache and mild dysuria. He reported a monogamous heterosexual relationship, but he denied abnormal urethral discharge, genital lesions, intravenous drug use, tick exposure, or recent travel outside his Midwestern home state. The exam was notable for a whole-body diffuse petechial rash (Fig. 1) but negative for joint effusions or stigmata of endocarditis. Laboratory analysis revealed mildly elevated white blood cells at 11.5 × 109/liter (normal range, 3.4 × 109 to 9.6 × 109/liter) with neutrophilia, hemoglobin at 13.0 g/dl (normal range, 13.2 to 16.6 g/dl), and a C-reactive protein level of 79.1 mg/liter (normal range, 3.0 to 8.0 mg/liter). Hepatic enzyme testing, blood chemistry panel, urinalysis, and urine Gram stain were unremarkable. Given his history and lack of overseas travel, the differential for his illness included enterovirus, parvovirus, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted infection, reactive arthritis, rheumatic disease, and bacteremia. Influenza and tick-borne illness were additional considerations, although the patient presented during the winter months, making influenza more likely than tick-borne illness. However, given a negative outpatient influenza result and the endemic nature of local tick-borne illnesses, a tick-borne panel was obtained that included testing for Lyme disease, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, and Babesia microti. In addition, blood cultures, urine studies for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, and a multiplex molecular stool panel for gastrointestinal pathogens (BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT) were performed, and blood for hepatitis, HIV, and syphilis serologies was obtained. Given the absence of joint effusions, no diagnostic joint aspiration was performed. The patient received a single dose of ceftriaxone to cover for sexually transmitted infections before being admitted.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Diffuse petechial rash of the extremities involving the palms (shown) and soles.

The patient received analgesia with naproxen and reported rapid improvement in his arthralgias. Overnight, blood cultures turned positive for Gram-negative rods in four of six bottles after 18 h (Fig. 2). All four aerobic Bactec Plus Aerobic/F bottles (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) flagged positive after 18 to 19 h of incubation, while both anaerobic bottles remained negative. The remainder of his infectious work-up was negative. Piperacillin-tazobactam, 3.375 g every 6 h, was started empirically. Small, gray colonies were apparent on sheep blood agar subcultured from the blood culture bottle after 18 h of incubation in 5 to 10% CO2 at 37°C. Growth was not observed on chocolate agar or eosin methylene blue agar. The organism was identified as Streptobacillus moniliformis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) with the MicroFlex LT Biotyper 3.0 software (Bruker) using an in-house custom library (Mayo Clinic custom Bruker database, v.2632). The patient denied any history of bites but kissed his pet rat daily. Subsequent blood cultures remained negative. No antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on the isolate. Antimicrobial therapy was switched to ceftriaxone, 2 g daily, and the patient was discharged with a peripherally inserted central catheter line to complete a 14-day course.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Gram stain of S. moniliformis from aerobic blood culture bottle, demonstrating thin, stacked Gram-negative rods (GNRs) (A) and colony growth demonstrating GNRs with bulbar swellings (B). Magnification, ×1,000.

DISCUSSION

Streptobacillus moniliformis is a pleomorphic, fastidious, Gram-negative bacillus and etiologic agent of rat bite fever (RBF) in the United States (1). Causative agents of RBF in other areas of the world include Spirillum minus throughout Asia and Streptobacillus notomytis in Japan (1, 2). S. minus is uncultivable, a distinguishing feature from Streptobacillus spp. The prevalence of RBF in the United States is unclear, since S. moniliformis infection is not a reportable disease and laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis can be challenging. There are approximately 20,000 to 40,000 rat bites annually in the United States, with a 2 to 10% risk of acquiring RBF, suggesting the disease often goes undiagnosed and is certainly underreported (1, 3).

S. moniliformis infection classically occurs following a rat bite and is more common among children, specifically those living in poverty, due to the increased exposure risk (1, 4). Nontraumatic transmission has been reported via mucous membranes, including when pet owners kiss their rat, or with other close contact (5). Cases without clear bite or scratch exposure highlight the need for a thorough history before removing RBF from the differential. Asymptomatic carriage of S. moniliformis among rats is common, occurring frequently in wild rats (50 to 100%) and laboratory-reared rats (10 to 100%) (1). After exposure, symptoms commonly present within the first 7 days, beginning with a nonspecific flu-like illness that can include headache, fever, myalgia, fatigue, and emesis (1). Progression of the disease includes migratory polyarthralgias, including both large and small joints in ≥50% of cases and a petechial, purpuric, or maculopapular rash beginning with the extremities and involving the palms and soles in up to 75% of patients (1, 6). Other pathogens may lead to rashes on the palms and soles but do not cause the particular constellation of symptoms seen with RBF. Examples include measles, toxic shock syndrome, coxsackievirus, rickettsiae, syphilis, meningococcemia, and bacterial endocarditis. Thus, a rash starting on the palms and soles accompanied by joint aches and fever should prompt questioning for rat exposure history. If antimicrobial therapy is delayed or not administered, mortality is reported to be 7 to 13% (1). Severe complications, such as endocarditis, can increase the risk of death to 43% (7). Outbreaks of S. moniliformis, referred to as Haverhill fever, a febrile illness often accompanied by vomiting and headache, are associated with consumption of food or water contaminated with rat excrement (1).

Definitive diagnosis of RBF caused by S. moniliformis classically relies on isolation of the organism from blood, synovial fluid, abscess fluid, or other sources (3). However, the fastidious nature of S. moniliformis can make its recovery a challenge. Sodium polyanethole sulfonate (SPS), a component of many modern blood culture bottle formulations, has been shown to inhibit the growth of S. moniliformis when comprising at least 0.0125% (wt/vol) of the blood bottle volume (8). For this reason, use of blood culture bottles lacking SPS, typically anaerobic bottles, has been recommended (1). Routine adult blood culture sets at our laboratory are comprised of two BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F bottles and one BD Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F bottle, which contain 0.05% (wt/vol) and 0.035% (wt/vol) SPS, respectively. Two sets of blood cultures were drawn peripherally from this patient, and all aerobic bottles were positive. In another case of RBF bacteremia diagnosed by our laboratory 1 month prior, 4/4 aerobic bottles also flagged positive (38 to 44 h), with anaerobic bottles remaining negative. These cases, combined with other examples in the literature, highlight that while growth conditions may be suboptimal and time to detection may vary, recovery of S. moniliformis is possible in aerobic adult blood culture bottles under routine conditions despite the presence of SPS (9, 10). Pediatric BD Bactec Peds Plus/F (BD) blood culture bottles likely contain less SPS (0.02% [wt/vol]) than the nonpediatric bottles. Description of the type of blood bottle used in pediatric cases of S. moniliformis has often not been provided in the published literature; thus, success of recovery with pediatric blood culture bottles is unknown (10, 11).

Recovery of S. moniliformis can be achieved on media containing blood incubated in 5 to 10% CO2 at 37°C (1, 3). Methods suggested in the literature to enhance recovery include plating to tryptic soy agar (e.g., Trypticase soy agar [BD]), brain heart infusion broth supplemented with 15 to 20% bovine or horse blood, or the addition of serum or ascitic fluid to routine media containing blood (1, 3, 12). Growth can take 48 to 72 h, appearing as small, gray, shiny, umbonate colonies or cell wall deficient L-forms with a “fried-egg” appearance (1, 10). In broth, culture growth is known to exhibit a “puff-ball” appearance (13). Gram stain from positive blood culture bottles display the characteristic long, thin, stacked or clumped, Gram-negative rods (Fig. 2A) (10). From colony growth, S. moniliformis can exhibit characteristic tangled chains with bulbar swellings (Fig. 2B) (1). Identification of S. moniliformis from culture can be accomplished via MALDI-TOF-MS or partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing (3, 10, 14). S. moniliformis is included in the Bruker RUO 7854 database, but not the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared version (Bruker). The organism is not part of the FDA or RUO databases for Vitek MS (bioMérieux). S. moniliformis is reportedly inert for rapid biochemicals, including oxidase, indole, catalase, and urease (1). It is not included in the organism databases of Vitek2 (bioMérieux), MicroScan (Beckman Coulter), Sensititre (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and API (bioMérieux).

Broad range bacterial 16S rRNA gene PCR and sequencing has been used to detect S. moniliformis direct from specimen, including epidural abscess fluid, explanted mechanical mitral valve, and vesicle fluid (4, 15, 16). Sensitivity of this approach is unknown and studies to compare molecular methods with culture from clinical specimens have not been performed. However, given the variable success of culture-based methods reported in the literature, molecular approaches are a reasonable option when diagnosis remains unclear.

Preferred treatment of RBF bacteremia includes intravenous penicillin G or ceftriaxone for 1 week (1). In uncomplicated cases of bacteremia with initial response to treatment after 1 week, patients can be transitioned to oral penicillin V for an additional week, completing 2 weeks of therapy (1). In patients with a history of anaphylactic penicillin allergy, a 14-day course of doxycycline has proven to be a successful alternative regimen (1, 17). In invasive infections, such as endocarditis, extended therapy of up to 4 weeks with intravenous penicillin G or ceftriaxone is recommended (1, 18). In cases of S. moniliformis endocarditis, penicillin G in combination with streptomycin or gentamicin has been recommended in a previous case report but has not been further studied (1, 18).

SELF-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS

  1. Which of the following is a known transmission modality for rat bite fever?
    • a.
      Aerosol transmission from a person infected with S. moniliformis
    • b.
      Mucous membrane contact with rat saliva, urine, or fecal matter
    • c.
      Skin contact with a person infected with S. moniliformis
    • d.
      Aerosol transmission from an asymptomatic rat carrying S. moniliformis
  1. Which of the following would best support growth of S. moniliformis?
    • a.
      Eosin methylene blue agar incubated in 5 to 10% CO2 at 37°C
    • b.
      Sheep blood agar incubated in room air at 30°C
    • c.
      Trypticase soy agar incubated in 5 to 10% CO2 at 37°C
    • d.
      Hektoen enteric agar incubated in microaerophilic conditions at 37°C
  1. What is the preferred initial treatment for bacteremia due to S. moniliformis?
    • a.
      Oral penicillin
    • b.
      Intravenous penicillin G
    • c.
      Oral doxycycline
    • d.
      Intravenous penicillin G with either streptomycin or gentamicin

For answers to the self-assessment questions and take-home points, see https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00678-19 in this issue.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Elliott SP. 2007. Rat bite fever and Streptobacillus moniliformis. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:13–22. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ogawa Y, Kasahara K, Lee ST, Ito T, Hasegawa H, Hirose S, Santo S, Yoshida A, Nakano R, Yano H, Mikasa K. 2018. Rat-bite fever in human with Streptobacillus notomytis infection, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 24:1377–1379. doi: 10.3201/eid2407.171580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eisenberg T, Ewers C, Rau J, Akimkin V, Nicklas W. 2016. Approved and novel strategies in diagnostics of rat bite fever and other Streptobacillus infections in humans and animals. Virulence 7:630–648. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1177694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hammer A, Wolff D, Geissdörfer W, Schrey M, Ziegler R, Steiner H-H, Bogdan C. 2017. A spinal epidural abscess due to Streptobacillus moniliformis infection following a rat bite: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 27:92–96. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE161042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vetter NM, Feder HM Jr, Ratzan RM. 2016. Rat bite fever caused by a kiss. Am J Emerg Med 34:1190.e3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Freels LK, Elliott SP. 2004. Rat bite fever: three case reports and a literature review. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 43:291–295. doi: 10.1177/000992280404300313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torres-Miranda D, Moshgriz M, Siegel M. 2018. Streptobacillus moniliformis mitral valve endocarditis and septic arthritis: the challenges of diagnosing rat-bite fever endocarditis. Infect Dis Rep 10:7731. doi: 10.4081/idr.2018.7731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lambe DW Jr, McPhedran AM, Mertz JA, Stewart P. 1973. Streptobacillus moniliformis isolated from a case of Haverhill fever: biochemical characterization and inhibitory effect of sodium polyanethol sulfonate. Am J Clin Pathol 60:854–860. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/60.6.854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fenn DW, Ramoutar A, Jacob G, Bin Xiao H. 2014. An unusual tale of rat-bite fever endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep 2014:bcr2014204989. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Relich RF, Boyd KM, McCoy MH, Kaufman C, Simpson ER, Christenson JC. 2016. Photo quiz: fever, rash, and polyarthralgia in a 5-year-old male. J Clin Microbiol 54:1937. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02056-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Flannery DD, Akinboyo I, Ty JM, Averill LW, Freedman A. 2013. Septic arthritis and concern for osteomyelitis in a child with rat bite fever. J Clin Microbiol 51:1987–1989. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03139-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eisenberg T, Nicklas W, Mauder N, Rau J, Contzen M, Semmler T, Hofmann N, Aledelbi K, Ewers C. 2015. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of members of the genus Streptobacillus. PLoS One 10:e0134312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gaastra W, Boot R, Ho HT, Lipman LJ. 2009. Rat bite fever. Vet Microbiol 133:211–228. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Boot R, Oosterhuis A, Thuis HC. 2002. PCR for the detection of Streptobacillus moniliformis. Lab Anim 36:200–208. doi: 10.1258/0023677021912352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berger C, Altwegg M, Meyer A, Nadal D. 2001. Broad range polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of rat-bite fever caused by Streptobacillus moniliformis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:1181–1182. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200112000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen PL, Lee NY, Yan JJ, Yang YJ, Chen HM, Chang CM, Lee HC, Ko NY, Lai CH, Ko WC. 2007. Prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Streptobacillus moniliformis: a case of rat bite fever. J Clin Microbiol 45:3125–3126. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01169-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Edwards R, Finch RG. 1986. Characterization and antibiotic susceptibilities of Streptobacillus moniliformis. J Med Microbiol 21:39–42. doi: 10.1099/00222615-21-1-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McCormack RC, Kaye D, Hook EW. 1967. Endocarditis due to streptobacillus moniliformis. JAMA 200:77–79. doi: 10.1001/jama.1967.03120140135036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES