Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the present study was to analyze the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with agenesis of the corpus callosum (CCA). A literature review and a retrospective analysis of our cochlear implant database were performed.
MATERIALS and METHODS
To the best of our knowledge, in the English literature, there was only one case reported with CCA who had undergone CI surgery. This case had Donnai–Barrow syndrome. In the Cukurova University School of Medicine Department of Otorhinolaryngology database, 5 of the 1317 patients who underwent CI surgery who had CCA were selected. The patients’ demographic characteristics, operative findings, surgical outcomes, and additional disabilities were investigated. The patients’ preoperative and postoperative Listening Progress Profile (LiP) and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) tests were done to analyze the auditory performances.
RESULTS
The participants of the study were 5 (0.38%) individuals (2 male and 3 female patients; ages 5.5, 7.5, 8, 9, and 12 years). Two of the patients had total agenesis, and the other three had partial agenesis of the CCA. In the histories of the patients, one patient had parental consanguinity, and one had febrile convulsion. No patient had an additional disability. None had experienced device failure. No patients were non-users or limited users of cochlear implants. Postoperative LiP and MAIS test scores were improved for all patients nearly as the patients without any deformity. They showed normal auditory performance in the analysis in their postoperative 48 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Patients who had CCA are good candidates for CI surgery.
Keywords: Cochlear implant, corpus callosum, agenesis, auditory performance
INTRODUCTION
The corpus callosum (CCA) is an interhemispheric fiber bunch located in the middle part of the brain. In humans, it contains approximately 200 million axons [1]. Although its presence has been known for centuries, some of its functions could still not be well understood. It is essential for learning, discrimination, sensory experience, memory, and synchronicity of sleep [1, 2]. It consists of four parts: rostrum, genu, splenium, and body. Agenesis of the CCA could be total (absence of all anatomical parts of the CCA) or partial (absence of at least one, but not all, parts of the CCA). Its diagnosis is based on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2–6].
In the literature, the true incidence of CCA is varied because of the asymptomatic cases. However, the reported incidence in children with developmental disabilities is 2%–3% [7–10]. It is frequently associated with different somatic, physical, and genetic diseases, such as attention deficit disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). CCA has been reported in >50 congenital human syndromes, such as Donnai–Barrow syndrome, Chudley–McCullough syndrome, Aicardi syndrome, and Kabuki syndrome [11–15].
To the best of our knowledge, there was only one case reported in the English literature who had CCA and underwent cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. This patient had Donnai–Barrow syndrome. In the present study, we examined the literature and patients in our tertiary referral cochlear implant center database who had CCA radiologically and received cochlear implants. The auditory performances before and after CI and comorbid abnormalities of the patients were analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed was searched for studies written in English with subjects “CCA AND SNHL,” in which we found 44 studies. When we searched the subjects “CCA AND SNHL AND CI,” we found only one case report study. After this literature review, we investigated our database.
Of the 1317 patients who underwent CI surgery at the Cukurova University School of Medicine Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Adana, Turkey between January 2000 and March 2017, 5 (0.38%) cochlear-implanted patients who had CCA were selected. Their medical records were documented. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Written informed consents from all participants were obtained.
At our clinic, all cochlear implant candidates who had profound SNHL were examined for compliance. The patients consulted to both the psychiatry and neurology departments. Moreover, pure tone audiometry, auditory brainstem response tests, and radiological investigations including computerized tomography of the temporal bone and MRI of the inner ear were performed routinely to all candidates. For the purpose of examining the preoperative and postoperative auditory performances of the CI candidates, we performed the Listening Progress Profile (LiP) and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) tests that were selected from the EARS protocols [16, 17]. In our study, we selected five patients who neuroradiologically had CCA and received cochlear implants. We investigated their comorbid abnormalities, etiology, and preoperative and postoperative 48 months of auditory performances. These patients were implanted with the same cochlear implant device (MED-EL Company, Austria) at a round window.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical package version 18.0 (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA).
RESULTS
A total of five patients were included in the study. The study comprised two male and three female patients. The ages of the patients were 5.5, 7.5, 8, 9, and 12 years. Two of the patients had total agenesis, and the other three had partial CCA. In addition to CCA, two patients had cerebellar vermis hypoplasia, and two patients had colpocephaly in the radiological examinations. Examples of the MRI findings of total CCA and partial CCA are shown in Figure 1. With respect to their histories, one patient had parental consanguinity, and one had febrile convulsion. One patient had mild mental retardation. All the patients’ perioperative tests were successful. The demographic characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1. a, b.

Example of the MRI findings. (a) Total corpus callosum agenesis and colpocephaly and (b) partial corpus callosum agenesis (absence of the splenium and posterior of the body) and colpocephaly in the T2 FLAIR MRI.
Table 1.
The demographic characteristics of the patients
| Age (year), sex | Age during implantation (month) | Approach | MRI findings | Preoperative tests | Risk factors for SNHL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case I | 5.5, female | 18 | Round window | Partial CCA (absence of the splenium and posterior of the body) | Successful | No |
| Case II | 7.5, male | 15 | Round window | Total CCA, cerebellar vermis hypogenesis | Successful | Mild mental retardation |
| Case III | 8, female | 19 | Round window | Partial CCA (absence of the splenium and posterior of the body), colpocephaly | Successful | Parents were consanguineous and brother has also total bilateral sensorineural hearing loss |
| Case IV | 9, male | 27 | Round window | Partial CCA (absence of the splenium and posterior of the body), cerebellar vermis hypogenesis | Successful | Febrile convulsion at 10 months |
| Case V | 12, female | 72 | Round window | Total CCA, colpocephaly | Successful | No |
SNHL: sensorineural hearing loss; CCA: corpus callosum agenesis
No patients were non-users or limited users of cochlear implants. No patient had device failure problem. The LiP and MAIS test scores were improved in the postoperative period, and they showed to be nearly normal as patients without any deformity in the auditory performances. The preoperative and 48-month postoperative results of the tests are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Postoperative LiP and MAIS test scores
| Preoperative LiP | Postoperative LiP 12 months |
Postoperative LiP 48 months |
Preoperative MAIS | Postoperative MAIS 12 months |
Postoperative MAIS 48 months |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case I | 0/42 | 30/42 | 42/42 | 2/40 | 32/40 | 40/40 |
| Case II | 3/42 | 34/42 | 42/42 | 2/40 | 33/40 | 40/40 |
| Case III | 3/42 | 36/42 | 42/42 | 0/40 | 33/40 | 40/40 |
| Case IV | 4/42 | 42/42 | 42/42 | 3/40 | 38/40 | 40/40 |
| Case V | 2/42 | 34/42 | 42/42 | 2/40 | 36/40 | 40/40 |
LiP: Listening Progress Profile; MAIS: Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale tests
DISCUSSION
The corpus callosum malformations were associated with several different syndromes, including Kabuki (Niikawa–Kuroki) syndrome, Chudley–McCullagh syndrome, and Donnai–Barrow syndrome [11, 12, 18, 19]. The genetic heritage of the CCA may be autosomal recessive, X-linked recessive, or autosomal dominant form [20].
The PAX2 gene is necessary for normal cochlear development and is necessary for CC development [21, 22]. Some of these malformations have been influenced by different types of the Pax gene homeobox regulators.
In recent years, promising radiological studies in the evaluation of the auditory cortex and auditory pathways in humans and also patients with CCA are reported. The new techniques used in these studies for structural connectivity framework and functional auditory areas in the cortex were functional MRI, diffusion tractography, probabilistic tractography, high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging, and high resolution 7 Tesla-diffusion tensor imaging, among others [23–25]. Severino et al. [25] demonstrated that even the absence of a small callosal segment may impact global brain connectivity and modularity organization of the brain.
Familial cases of CCA without other anomalies are rare. Wilson et al. [26] reported two brothers with complete CCA, developmental retardation, and cranial problems. Shapira and Cohen [27] defined two sisters from consanguineous parents with CCA. Parrish et al. [28] published 11 cases with CCA. They reported a high incidence of anomalies and no togetherness with deafness.
Donnai–Barrow syndrome or facio-oculo-acoustico-renal syndrome is a rare disease especially with dual sensory loss, for instance, bilateral SNHL and visual problems [12]. It is characterized by craniofacial abnormalities (ocular hypertelorism and enlarged fontanelle), ocular findings (high myopia, retinal problems, progressive loss of vision, and iris coloboma), SNHL, CCA, intellectual disability, exomphalos, and hernia of the diaphragm.
The corpus callosum is one of the most frequently seen malformations in the brain, and it is rarely associated with SNHL. We found only one case with Donnai–Barrow syndrome as reported by Bruce et al. [29] who had CCA and underwent CI surgery. The case was born at full term. The parents were consanguineous. The patient’s MRI demonstrated an absent CCA. Hearing loss was first detected at aged 1 month. He started to use bilateral hearing aid at aged 5 months. Although there were extensive developmental retardation and speech problems, the patient’s non-verbal communication talents were well improved. He had undergone CI surgery to the right ear at aged 39 months. His perioperative test was successful, and no complication occurred. His verbal communication improved by 2 years.
Cochlear implantation is a common surgical technique for patients who had total SNHL. Wrong indications of this procedure can cause a large number of limited-user or non-user patients in the long term and waste of public money. This would also discourage further funding for this procedure in many countries [30].
In our tertiary referral cochlear implant center database, we had five patients who radiologically had CCA and received cochlear implants. The auditory performances before and after CI and the comorbid abnormalities of the patients were analyzed. During their follow-up, the auditory performance analysis scores improved nearly the same as the patients in the same ages without any abnormality.
CONCLUSION
The corpus callosum (CCA) is rarely associated with SNHL. Patients who had CCA without a syndrome or an additional disability are good candidates for CI surgery.
Footnotes
This study was presented at the 10th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences Congress, April 30–May 3, 2015, Beijing, China.
Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the Cukurova University School of Medicine Ethics Committee.
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was received from the patients who participated in this study.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Author Contributions: Concept – S.O., U.T.; Design – S.O.; Supervision – S.O., U.T., F.C., M.K.; Resource – S.O., O.S.; Materials – S.O., O.S., O.T., F.C., M.K., M.D., P.S., N.T., F.A.; Data Collection and/or Processing – S.O., U.T., O.S., O.T., M.K., M.D., P.S., N.T., F.A.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – S.O., O.S., O.T., M.D.; Literature Search – S.O., U.T., O.S., O.T., M.D., P.S., N.T., F.A.; Writing – S.O.,O.S.; Critical Reviews – S.O., U.T., F.C., M.K.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
REFERENCES
- 1.Aboitiz F, Montiel J. One hundred million years of interhemispheric communication: The history of the corpus callosum. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003;36:409–20. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2003000400002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dobyns WB. Absence makes the search grow longer. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:7–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Georgy BA, Hesselink JR, Jernigan TL. MR imaging of the corpus callosum. AJR. 1993;160:94955. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.5.8470609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Palmer EE, Mowat D. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: A clinical approach to diagnosis. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C:184–97. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Behpour Y. Brain commissural anomalies. In: Mantamadiotis T, editor. When Things Go Wrong-Diseases and Disorders of the Human Brain. London (UK): InTech Publishers; 2012. p. 6993. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Osawe AA, Kabir SM, Ismail A. Partial corpus callosal agenesis with ventriculomegaly and sulcal anomaly in a 10-year-old child. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018;25:63–5. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_5_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Glass HC, Shaw GM, Ma C, Sherr EH. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in California 19832003: A populationbased study. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:2495500. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chiappedi M, Bejor M. Corpus callosum agenesis and rehabilitative treatment. Ital J Pediatr. 2010;36:64. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-36-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grogono JL. Children with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1968;10:613–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1968.tb02944.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schaefer GB, Bodensteiner JB. Evaluation of the child with idiopathic mental retardation. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1992;39:929–43. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)38381-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chudley AE, McCullough C, McCullough DW. Bilateral sensorineural deafness and hydrocephalus due to foramen of Monro obstruction in sibs: A newly described autosomal recessive disorder. Am J Med Genet. 1997;68:350–6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970131)68:3<350::aid-ajmg19>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Donnai D, Barrow M. Diaphragmatic hernia, exomphalos, absent corpus callosum, hypertelorism, myopia and sensorineural deafness: a newly recognised autosomal recessive disorder. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47:679–82. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hendriks YMC, Laan LAEM, Vielvoye GJ, van Haeringen A. Bilateral sensorineural deafness, partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, and arachnoid cysts in two sisters. Am J Med Genet. 1999;86:183–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ostergaard E, Pedersen VF, Skriver EB, Brondum-Nielsen K. Brothers with Chudley-McCullough syndrome: sensorineural deafness, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and other structural brain abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124:74–8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wegiel J, Flory M, Kaczmarski W, Brown WT, Chadman K, Wisniewski T, et al. Partial Agenesis and Hypoplasia of the Corpus Callosum in Idiopathic Autism. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76:225–37. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlx003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Allum DJ, AIlum JHJ, Baumgartner W, Brockmeier SJ, Dahm M, Esser B, Gall V, et al. Multi-language international perceptual test battery for comparing performance of children in different countries: Evaluation of auditory responses to speech (EARS). 3rd Eur Symp Pediatr Cochlear Implant; June 6–8; Hannover, Germany. 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ozdemir S, Kıroğlu M, Tuncer U, Sahin R, Tarkan O, Sürmelioğlu O. Auditory performance analyses of cochlear implanted patients. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2011;21:243–50. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2011.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Niikawa N, Matsuura N, Fukushima Y, Ohsawa T, Kajii T. Kabuki make-up syndrome: a syndrome of mental retardation, unusual facies, large and protruding ears, and postnatal growth deficiency. J Pediatr. 1981;99:565–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(81)80255-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kuroki Y, Suzuki Y, Chyo H, Hata A, Matsui I. A new malformation syndrome of long palpebral fissures, large ears, depressed nasal tip, and skeletal anomalies associated with postnatal dwarfism and mental retardation. J Pediatr. 1981;99:570–3. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(81)80256-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hendriks YMC, Laan LAEM, Vielvoye GJ, van Haeringen A. Bilateral sensorineural deafness, partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, and arachnoid cysts in two sisters. Am J Med Genet. 1999;86:183–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Torres M, Gomez-Pardo E, Gruss P. Pax2 contributes to inner ear patterning and optic nerve trajectory. Development. 1996;122:3381–91. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.11.3381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schuffenhauer S, Leifheit HJ, Lichtner P, Peters H, Murken J, Emmerich P. De novo deletion (14)(q11.2q13) including PAX9: clinical and molecular findings. J Med Genet. 1999;36:233–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ahveninen J, Chang WT, Huang S, Keil B, Kopco N, Rossi S, et al. Intracortical depth analyses of frequency-sensitive regions of human auditory cortex using 7TfMRI. Neuroimage. 2016;143:116–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Javad F, Warren JD, Micallef C, Thornton JS, Golay X, Yousry T, et al. Auditory tracts identified with combined fMRI and diffusion tractography. Neuroimage. 2014;84:562–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Severino M, Tortora D, Toselli B, Uccella S, Traverso M, Morana G, et al. Structural Connectivity Analysis in Children with Segmental Callosal Agenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:639–47. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wilson WG, Kennaugh JM, Kugler JP, Reynolds JF. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in two brothers. J Med Genet. 1983;20:416–8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.20.6.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shapira Y, Cohen T. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in two sisters. J Med Genet. 1973;10:266–9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.10.3.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Parrish ML, Roessmann U, Levinsohn MW. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: a study of the frequency of associated malformations. Ann Neurol. 1979;6:349–54. doi: 10.1002/ana.410060408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bruce IA, Broomfield SJ, Henderson L, Green KM, Ramsden RT. Cochlear implantation in Donnai-Barrow syndrome. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011;12:60–3. doi: 10.1179/146701010X486534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Özdemir S, Tuncer Ü, Tarkan Ö, Kıroğlu M, Çetik F, Akar F. Factors contributing to limited or non-use in the cochlear implant systems in children: 11 years experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:407–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
