Graphical abstract
Method name: Environmental radioactivity
Keywords: Radioactivity, Radiological risk assessment, Granite mining field, Super-Spec RS-125, Construction purposes, North-Central Nigeria
Abstract
In this study, a well calibrated Super-Spec (RS-125) gamma spectrometer was used to measure the activity concentrations of 40K, 238U, 232Th and gamma doses rate at 1 m above the ground level over a granite mining field in Asa, Kwara State, North-central Nigeria. Measurements were carried out in 50 randomly selected sample points. The overall mean activity concentrations of 40K, 238U, 232Th and gamma dose are 570.91, 42.86, 18.15 Bqkg−1, and 60.11 nGyh−1 respectively. The results of the activity concentrations were used to estimate the corresponding radiation hazard parameters to assess the suitability of the granite for building and construction purposes. The data in this study could serve as the baseline radiological data of the region for future references.
-
•
Activity concentrations of 40K,238U,232Th and gamma doses were measured over a granite mining field in Asa.
-
•
The total mean activity concentrations of the radioisotopes and gamma dose are 570.91, 42.86, 18.15 Bqkg−1, and 60.11 nGyh−1 respectively.
-
•
The radiological hazards are higher than the recommended permissible limits.
Specification Table
| Subject Area: | Environmental Sciences |
| More specific subject area: | Radiation and Health |
| Method name: | Environmental Radioactivity |
| Name and reference of original method: | Radiometrics |
| Resource availability: | Super-Spec Gamma RS-125 |
Method details
Natural radionuclides are broadly dispersed in the Earth crust. They are found in significant concentrations in many mineral rocks. Granites, just like other mineral rocks, may possibly hold deposits of natural radionuclides like 238U, 232Th, their progenies and the non-series 40K [1,2]. The activity concentrations of these radionuclides may differ even within a particular block of granite. If present, these radionuclides will decay to give off radon and some amounts of gamma and beta radiations. Human exposure to ionizing radiation resulting from these radionuclides and their progenies can cause cancer and other radiation health effects, damaging critical organs of the body which could even lead to death [1,[3], [4], [5]]. For granites used for building and construction of houses, these dangerous radiations will be released over the lifetime of using such buildings. So the knowledge of the concentrations of these radionuclides in building materials is fundamental for estimating the level of public exposure to radiations, since most residents spend approximately 80% of their time indoors. In order to reduce these radiation risks, the United State Environmental Protection Agency recommended that all houses should be tested for these radionuclides, whether they contains granite countertops or not [1]. Such an action is not economically feasible for a third world country like Nigeria. So researchers resolve to monitoring and assessments of the mine fields where the building materials (mineral rocks or soils) are mined originally and their finished products.
The levels of 238U, 232Th, their respective progenies and the non-series 40K have been studied in different building materials (both raw and finished products) from different parts of the country [[6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]], but none has been carried out in Kwara State despite the increasing level of granite mining and usage in this part of the country. Also, data from University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH) shows that 74 different cancers of 2246 (891 male and 1355 female) cancer patients within the age of 1–105 were recorded at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH) cancer registry between the period of 2007 and 2016 [23]. Therefore, a pioneer study which is based on internationally verified methodology regarding assessment of radiological health implications on the general populace due to granite mining in this part of the country is apposite.
Study area
Asa is a Local Government Area in Kwara State, Nigeria. It has an area of 1286 km² and a population of 126,435 according to 2006 census. It is located at the southwestern part of Kwara State and it is surrounded by Moro local government to the north, Oyun and Offa local government to the South and Ilorin west local government to the East. The study area lies between latitudes 4012’N and 4029’N and longitudes 807’E and 8042’E (Fig. 1a and b). The study area is underlain by basement complex rock. The soils are formed from basement complex rocks (metamorphic and igneous rocks) which is about 95%. The metamorphic rocks consist of biotite gnesiss, banded gnesiss, quartzite augitegnesiss and granitic gnesiss. The intrusive rock comprises of pegmatite and vein quartz [[24], [25], [26]]. Detail geology of the study area can be found in [[24], [25], [26], [27], [28]].
Fig. 1.
(a) Geological map of Nigeria showing the survey area (b) Granite mining field in Asa LGA, Kwara state, Nigeria.
Materials and methods
Field survey
For the in situ measurements of activity concentrations of 40K, 232Th, 238U and the radiation dose exposures, Super SPEC RS-125 spectrometer with large 2.0 × 2.0 NaI crystal was used. The measurement of the activity concentration of the radionuclides was carried out at about 1 m above the topsoil [15,29]. The RS-125 is a transportable handheld radiation detector with high accuracy and likely error of about 5%. It presents superior integrated design with big detector, good sensitivity and easy to use. The RS-125 is manufactured by Canadian Geophysical Institute and it comes with a large data storage which allows one to take multiple readings with ease. The RS-125 spectrometer was calibrated in accordance with Canadian Geophysical Institute i.e., the instrument was calibrated on 1 × 1 m test pads, which employs 5 min spectra accumulation on potassium, uranium and thorium pads and 10 min accumulation on the Background pad. It makes use of sodiumiodide (NaI) crystal doped with thallium [Tl] as activator. The energy range of the instrument, is from 30 to 3000 keV, which is enough to detect most of the radiation giving off from the terrestrial sources (i.e. 214Bi (609.31 and 1764.49 keV) gamma rays to determine 238U, 212Pb (238.63 keV), 208Tl (583.19 keV) and 228Ac (911.21 keV) gamma rays to determine 232Th and the photopeaks of 40K which occours in the background spectrum at 1460.83 keV). The detection of gamma-ray from cosmic ray is small and negligible due to the detector’s low response to high-energy gamma radiation. The total count of 120 s per assay was employed for best accuracy as stated in Radiation Solutions Inc [15]. The assay mode of the instrument gives the activity concentration of 40K in percentage (%), 238U and 232Th in part per million (ppm). The data was converted to the conventional unit Bqkg−1 using conversion factors given by [15,30].
In this work, four (4) readings were recorded at each data point at the interval of 120 s. 50 sample points were recorded to cover the area of the mining field. The field was divided into grids of approximately equal size (i.e. 50 semi-rectangular boxes) with each box representing a data collection point. At each of these samples location (point), the coordinate and elevation were determined using a global positioning system (GPSMAP78). More details about the instrument can be found in [15,17,19,29].
Estimation of the radiological impact parameters (RIP)
Radium equivalent activity index (Raeq)
The distributions of the measured radionuclides are not uniform in the environment. So exposure to radiation has been defined in terms of radium equivalent activity (Raeq) in Bqkg−1 to compare the specific activity of materials containing different amounts of 238U, 232Th and 40K. This is based on the assumption that 1 Bqkg−1 of 238U, 0.7 Bqkg−1 of 232Th and 13 Bqkg−1 of 40K produce the same radiation dose rates. This allows a single number to be used to represent the gamma output due to different combination of 238U, 232Th and 40K in the granite material. The Raeq was calculated using Eq. (1) [31,32]:
| (1) |
where Cu, CTh and CK are the radioactivity concentration in Bqkg−1 for 238U, 232Th and 40K respectively. The average value of 370 Bqkg-1 is recommended normal background radiation value [31].
Radiation hazard indices
Eq. (2) and (3) were used to calculate the external radiation hazard (Hext) and the internal radiation hazard (Hint).
| (2) |
| (3) |
where Cu, CTh and CK are as defined in Eq. (1) above.
For the radiation hazard to be small, both Hint and Hext ought to be less than 1. Natural radioactive elements in soil generates external field to which the general populace are exposed. Hext equal to unity translates to the upper limit of radium equivalent dose (370 Bqkg−1) [19,31,32].
Absorbed dose rate
At 1 m height above the ground level, it is assumed that the naturally occurring radionuclides will have a uniform distribution. The outdoor absorbed dose rate at 1 m above the ground is calculated using Eq. (4) [2,15,31].
| (4) |
But fortunately, this outdoor dose rate was measured in situ using the RS-125 Gamma Spec.
The granite from Asa LGA as highlighted earlier, is primarily used for building purposes. As a result, the indoor radiation dose rate in a typical building of 4 × 5 × 2.8 m room size, with wall thickness of about 20 cm was calculated using Eq. (5) [13]:
| (5) |
where Cu, CTh and CK are as defined earlier.
Annual effective dose (AED)
The annual effective dose received indoor and outdoor by a member of the public was calculated from dose rates given in Eqs. (6) and (7). Dose conversion factor of 0.7 Sv Gy−1 and occupancy factor for outdoor and indoor as 0.2 and 0.8 were adopted [13,31].
| AEDoutdoor (mSvy−1) = Doutdoor (nGy h−1) × 8760 h × 0.7 (Sv Gy−1)×0.2 × 10-6 | (6) |
| AEDintdoor (mSvy−1) = Dindoor (nGy h−1) × 8760 h × 0.7 (Sv Gy−1)×0.8 × 10-6 | (7) |
Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR)
The Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) was calculated using Eq. (8):
| ELCR = AEDindoor ×DL × RF | (8) |
where, AEDindoor is the indoor Annual Equivalent Dose, DL is the average duration of life (estimated to 70 years) and RF is the Risk Factor ( Sv−1), i.e. fatal cancer risk per Sievert. ICRP uses RF as 0.05 for stochastic effects for the general public [19,31,32].
Annual gonadal equivalent dose (AGED)
An increase in AGED has been known to result in leukemia which is very fatal. This hazard parameter for the residents using the granite for building was evaluated using Eq. (9) [19,31,32]:
| AGED (μSvy−1) = 3.09CU + 4.18CTh + 0.314CK | (9) |
where CU, CTh, and CK maintain their usual definitions.
Representative level index (RLI)
RLI value of 1 corresponds to an AED of less than or equal to 1 mSv. Thus, RLI is a radiological impact parameter for screening materials used for building construction and the RLI was estimated using Eq. 10 [31,32].
| (10) |
where CU, CTh, and CK maintain their usual definition.
Method descriptions
The record of the measured activity concentrations of 40K, 238U and 232Th, the gamma dose rate, the elevations and the estimated radium equivalent activity index for the 50 sample locations is presented in Table 1. The mean activity concentration of 40K was observed to dominate the 238U and 232Th mean activities. The activity concentration of 40K ranges between 250.40 ± 6.0 and 970.30 ± 6.0 Bqkg−1 with an average value of 570.91 Bqkg−1. For 238U, the measured activities range between 1.24 ± 0.1 and 61.75 ± 3.4 with mean value of 18.15, while for 232Th it ranges between 8.53 ± 0.5 and 76.33 ± 5.2 with an average value of 42.86 Bqkg−1. The estimated mean value for 40K was relatively higher than the global average of 420.00 Bqkg−1 for normal background radiation levels recommended by [31] as shown in Fig. 2. It was observed that the measured activity concentration of 40K were lower than the global limit in just 8 (16%) locations out of the 50. Surprisingly, all the measured and the mean activity concentrations of 238U are lower than the global average of 32.00 Bqkg−1 [31]. However, the mean activity concentration of 232Th was found to higher than the given global average of 30.00 Bqkg−1. As a matter of fact, the measured values of the activity concentrations are higher than the recommended limit in about 80% (40 out 50) of the sample points. This is a reason for concern because considerable enrichment or increase in the concentration of 232Th will enhance the level of the background radiation and maybe render the mineral rock unfit for use in building and construction purposes. The maximum, minimum and the average value for the measured outdoor dose rate are 85.30 ± 2.0, 40.10 ± 0.1 and 60.11 nGyhr−1 respectively. This mean value for the outdoor dose is higher than the recommended permissible value of 59 nGyh−1 recommended [31]. Fig. 2 revealed that the granite mine field is enriched with potassium and thorium which causes the gamma dose rate to be high. This high background ionizing radiation has been reported to cause various kinds of cancers and cruel health related harms which may possibly lead to death [5,13,15,19].
Table 1.
Measured activity concentrations of 40K, 238U, 232Th, the absorbed dose rates (DR) and the Radium equivalent activity from Asa LGA.
| SAMPLE CODE | Latitude ⁰N |
Longitude ⁰E | Elvtn (m) |
DR (nGyh−1) |
40K (Bqkg−1) |
238U (Bqkg−1) | 232Th (Bqkg−1) | Raeq (Bqkg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAS1 | 8⁰21.296' | 4⁰24.023' | 359 | 55.70 ± 0.4 | 500.80 ± 7.0 | 25.94 ± 1.0 | 35.32 ± 2.0 | 115.01 |
| ASAS2 | 8⁰21.297' | 4⁰24.026' | 358 | 59.60 ± 3.2 | 532.10 ± 5.0 | 11.12 ± 0.1 | 48.72 ± 2.4 | 121.76 |
| ASAS3 | 8⁰21.297' | 4⁰24.028' | 358 | 59.70 ± 2.0 | 626.00 ± 6.0 | 22.23 ± 1.0 | 36.95 ± 3.0 | 123.26 |
| ASAS4 | 8⁰21.298' | 4⁰24.031' | 359 | 78.70 ± 5.0 | 688.60 ± 3.0 | 39.52 ± 1.2 | 48.31 ± 3.0 | 161.63 |
| ASAS5 | 8⁰21.298' | 4⁰24.032' | 360 | 65.10 ± 2.1 | 657.30 ± 9.0 | 39.52 ± 2.0 | 30.04 ± 2.0 | 133.10 |
| ASAS6 | 8⁰21.298' | 4⁰24.033' | 360 | 52.30 ± 2.0 | 532.10 ± 7.0 | 24.70 ± 2.1 | 29.23 ± 1.0 | 107.47 |
| ASAS7 | 8⁰21.298' | 4⁰24.035' | 360 | 60.70 ± 1.0 | 657.30 ± 6.0 | 25.94 ± 1.0 | 32.89 ± 1.0 | 123.57 |
| ASAS8 | 8⁰21.299' | 4⁰24.037' | 360 | 49.10 ± 3.0 | 532.10 ± 8.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 41.41 ± 2.0 | 101.43 |
| ASAS9 | 8⁰21.299' | 4⁰24.037' | 359 | 53.50 ± 2.0 | 438.20 ± 6.0 | 18.53 ± 2.1 | 40.60 ± 2.0 | 110.32 |
| ASAS10 | 8⁰21.299' | 4⁰24.040' | 360 | 45.20 ± 1.0 | 438.20 ± 7.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 41.01 ± 2.0 | 93.61 |
| ASAS11 | 8⁰21.298' | 4⁰24.042' | 361 | 49.60 ± 1.0 | 532.10 ± 4.0 | 30.88 ± 2.1 | 21.11 ± 1.0 | 102.04 |
| ASAS12 | 8⁰21.297' | 4⁰24.040' | 361 | 58.00 ± 1.0 | 688.60 ± 6.0 | 8.65 ± 1.0 | 38.57 ± 2.0 | 116.82 |
| ASAS13 | 8⁰21.297' | 4⁰24.038' | 361 | 60.40 ± 1.0 | 406.90 ± 7.0 | 25.94 ± 1.0 | 48.31 ± 3.0 | 126.36 |
| ASAS14 | 8⁰21.296' | 4⁰24.036' | 362 | 41.90 ± 1.0 | 438.20 ± 7.0 | 2.47 ± 1.0 | 33.29 ± 2.0 | 83.82 |
| ASAS15 | 8⁰21.296' | 4⁰24.034' | 360 | 51.40 ± 1.0 | 438.20 ± 4.0 | 18.53 ± 1.1 | 38.16 ± 2.0 | 106.84 |
| ASAS16 | 8⁰21.295' | 4⁰24.033' | 359 | 77.70 ± 1.2 | 657.30 ± 5.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 76.33 ± 5.2 | 161.00 |
| ASAS17 | 8⁰21.295' | 4⁰24.031' | 359 | 63.70 ± 1.4 | 719.90 ± 5.0 | 6.18 ± 1.0 | 46.69 ± 1.2 | 128.37 |
| ASAS18 | 8⁰21.294' | 4⁰24.031' | 360 | 60.70 ± 2.0 | 688.60 ± 5.0 | 17.29 ± 1.2 | 36.95 ± 2.0 | 123.14 |
| ASAS19 | 8⁰21.294' | 4⁰24.030' | 359 | 74.60 ± 2.0 | 688.60 ± 4.0 | 1.24 ± 0.1 | 68.61 ± 3.2 | 152.38 |
| ASAS20 | 8⁰21.293' | 4⁰24.028' | 359 | 49.50 ± 4.0 | 438.20 ± 3.0 | 13.59 ± 1.0 | 38.16 ± 2.0 | 101.90 |
| ASAS21 | 8⁰21.291' | 4⁰24.028' | 360 | 40.10 ± 0.1 | 250.40 ± 6.0 | 23.47 ± 2.1 | 28.83 ± 2.1 | 83.97 |
| ASAS22 | 8⁰21.291' | 4⁰24.030' | 359 | 63.50 ± 6.0 | 626.00 ± 7.0 | 39.52 ± 2.4 | 29.64 ± 1.0 | 130.10 |
| ASAS23 | 8⁰21.291' | 4⁰24.030' | 359 | 55.50 ± 2.0 | 594.70 ± 7.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 45.47 ± 2.0 | 112.05 |
| ASAS24 | 8⁰21.292' | 4⁰24.033' | 358 | 61.90 ± 2.0 | 626.00 ± 6.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 53.19 ± 3.0 | 125.49 |
| ASAS25 | 8⁰21.292' | 4⁰24.034' | 359 | 51.40 ± 2.5 | 313.00 ± 4.0 | 23.47 ± 2.0 | 41.82 ± 2.4 | 107.37 |
| ASAS26 | 8⁰21.293' | 4⁰24.035' | 356 | 56.10 ± 2.3 | 532.10 ± 7.0 | 9.88 ± 1.0 | 44.66 ± 1.0 | 114.72 |
| ASAS27 | 8⁰21.293' | 4⁰24.036' | 358 | 52.10 ± 2.4 | 281.70 ± 5.0 | 43.23 ± 2.0 | 32.07 ± 1.3 | 110.78 |
| ASAS28 | 8⁰21.293' | 4⁰24.040' | 358 | 54.60 ± 2.1 | 406.90 ± 5.0 | 35.82 ± 2.0 | 33.70 ± 1.0 | 115.33 |
| ASAS29 | 8⁰21.295' | 4⁰24.042' | 360 | 55.60 ± 5.0 | 532.10 ± 7.0 | 29.64 ± 1.0 | 30.04 ± 2.0 | 113.57 |
| ASAS30 | 8⁰21.296' | 4⁰24.043' | 359 | 46.50 ± 2.0 | 344.30 ± 7.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 49.53 ± 2.0 | 98.58 |
| ASAS31 | 8⁰21.308' | 4⁰24.039' | 354 | 55.10 ± 2.0 | 626.00 ± 5.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 43.04 ± 2.0 | 110.98 |
| ASAS32 | 8⁰21.307' | 4⁰24.037' | 356 | 58.80 ± 2.0 | 782.50 ± 5.0 | 1.24 ± 0.1 | 38.98 ± 1.1 | 117.22 |
| ASAS33 | 8⁰21.307' | 4⁰24.037' | 356 | 46.00 ± 2.0 | 406.90 ± 6.0 | 8.65 ± 2.0 | 38.16 ± 1.0 | 94.55 |
| ASAS34 | 8⁰21.306' | 4⁰24.035' | 355 | 49.60 ± 1.0 | 406.90 ± 7.0 | 61.75 ± 3.4 | 8.53 ± 0.5 | 105.27 |
| ASAS35 | 8⁰21.306' | 4⁰24.032' | 355 | 85.30 ± 2.0 | 751.20 ± 7.0 | 34.58 ± 1.0 | 58.06 ± 5.2 | 175.45 |
| ASAS36 | 8⁰21.304' | 4⁰24.030' | 356 | 81.30 ± 4.0 | 657.30 ± 7.0 | 54.34 ± 2.0 | 45.47 ± 3.0 | 169.98 |
| ASAS37 | 8⁰21.304' | 4⁰24.030' | 356 | 85.20 ± 6.0 | 970.30 ± 6.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 66.99 ± 2.0 | 171.74 |
| ASAS38 | 8⁰21.303' | 4⁰24.028' | 357 | 55.70 ± 2.0 | 657.30 ± 6.0 | 19.76 ± 1.0 | 29.23 ± 1.0 | 112.17 |
| ASAS39 | 8⁰21.303' | 4⁰24.024' | 358 | 49.10 ± 2.0 | 594.70 ± 2.0 | 22.23 ± 1.3 | 22.33 ± 1.2 | 99.95 |
| ASAS40 | 8⁰21.303' | 4⁰24.023' | 358 | 55.90 ± 1.0 | 563.40 ± 7.0 | 35.82 ± 1.2 | 23.95 ± 1.0 | 113.45 |
| ASAS41 | 8⁰21.304' | 4⁰24.023' | 359 | 69.80 ± 1.0 | 657.30 ± 4.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 62.93 ± 3.1 | 141.84 |
| ASAS42 | 8⁰21.304' | 4⁰24.024' | 357 | 70.10 ± 4.0 | 500.80 ± 4.0 | 12.35 ± 1.3 | 66.18 ± 3.0 | 145.55 |
| ASAS43 | 8⁰21.306' | 4⁰24.025' | 357 | 63.80 ± 2.0 | 657.30 ± 5.0 | 7.41 ± 1.1 | 52.37 ± 4.2 | 132.92 |
| ASAS44 | 8⁰21.307' | 4⁰24.027' | 358 | 67.20 ± 2.0 | 688.60 ± 5.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 56.84 ± 2.0 | 135.54 |
| ASAS45 | 8⁰21.308' | 4⁰24.029' | 358 | 73.50 ± 4.0 | 782.50 ± 6.0 | 29.64 ± 1.0 | 42.22 ± 2.3 | 150.27 |
| ASAS46 | 8⁰21.309' | 4⁰24.031' | 359 | 74.00 ± 3.0 | 688.60 ± 3.0 | 30.88 ± 2.2 | 48.31 ± 1.0 | 152.99 |
| ASAS47 | 8⁰21.309' | 4⁰24.032' | 358 | 67.20 ± 2.0 | 688.60 ± 2.0 | 8.65 ± 1.0 | 55.62 ± 2.0 | 141.21 |
| ASAS48 | 8⁰21.311' | 4⁰24.036' | 358 | 70.60 ± 2.0 | 657.30 ± 5.0 | 1.24 ± 1.0 | 61.71 ± 4.1 | 140.10 |
| ASAS49 | 8⁰21.310' | 4⁰24.039' | 358 | 52.70 ± 1.0 | 563.40 ± 4.0 | 4.94 ± 1.0 | 41.01 ± 2.0 | 106.96 |
| ASAS50 | 8⁰21.312' | 4⁰24.043' | 361 | 70.00 ± 1.0 | 438.20 ± 5.0 | 24.70 ± 1.0 | 61.31 ± 3.1 | 146.11 |
| Min | 354 | 40.10 ± 0.1 | 250.40 ± 6.0 | 1.24 ± 0.1 | 8.53 ± 0.5 | 83.82 | ||
| Max | 362 | 85.30 ± 2.0 | 970.30 ± 6.0 | 61.75 ± 3.4 | 76.33 ± 5.2 | 175.45 | ||
| Mean | 359 | 60.11 | 570.91 | 18.15 | 42.86 | 123.40 | ||
|
GLOBAL AVERAGE [31] |
– | 59.00 | 420.00 | 32.00 | 30.00 | 370.00 |
Fig. 2.
Mean activity concentrations of 40K, 232Th & 238U, Dose rate (DR) and the Radium equivalent.
We conducted a correlation analysis to study the relationship between these measured radionuclides and the gamma dose rate. The result of the correlation analysis which is presented in Table 2, were classified according to the correlation coefficient R [33]. A significant correlation was found to exist between DR and 40K (R = 0.7259), DR and 232Th (R = 0.6768) and 232Th and 238U (0.5450). While weak correlation was observed between 40K and 232Th (R = 0.3768) and insignificant correlation was observed to exist between others. The correlation results confirm that the granite mine field is endowed with potassium and thorium, and they contributed significantly to the gamma dose received from the field than 238U. However, the significant correlation observed between 232Th and 238U could mean that they share common origin during the rock formation.
Table 2.
Pearson’s correlation matrix showing the relationship between the measured radionuclides and the gamma dose rate at the granite mine field.
| DR (nGyh−1) | 40K (Bqkg−1) | 238U (Bqkg−1) | 232Th (Bqkg−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DR (nGyh−1) | 1.0000 | |||
| 40K (Bqkg−1) | 0.7259 | 1.0000 | ||
| 238U (Bqkg−1) | 0.0775 | 0.1975 | 1.0000 | |
| 232Th (Bqkg−1) | 0.6768 | 0.3768 | 0.5450 | 1.0000 |
The results of the estimated radiological parameters Raeq, Hint, Hext Din, Dout, AEDindoor, AEDoutdoor, ELCR, AGED and RLI respectively are presented in Table 3. The estimated values for the radium equivalent (Raeq) ranges between 175.45 and 83.82 Bqkg−1 with an average value of 123.40 Bqkg−1. The average value of Raeq is lower than the limit of 370 Bqkg−1 recommended by UNSCEAR [31] for materials considered safe for the construction of buildings. The calculated highest, lowest and mean values of the external radiation hazard (Hext) and the internal radiation hazard (Hint) are below unity. The mean values for the Dout and EADoutdoor are 57.68 nGyh−1 and 0.07 mSvy−1 respectively. These values are about the recommended values of 59.00 nGyh−1 and 0.07 mSvy−1 for Dout and EADoutdoor respectively. The indoor gamma dose (Din) received by the general populace due to the radionuclides concentration in the granite ranges between 155.77 and 73.33 nGyh−1 with mean value of 109.52 nGyh−1. The estimated mean value of EADindoor was found to be 0.54 mSvy−1. These mean values of Din and EADindoor are well above the limits of 84.00 nGyh−1 and 0.41 mSvy−1 respectively [2,13,15,19,31]. This reveals that there is danger of indoor gamma radiation exposure is much and the general public is not safe from overexposure to indoor ionizing radiation if the granite is used for building purposes.
Table 3.
Summary of the estimated radiological parameters (RIP).
| SAMPLE CODE | Din (nGyh−1) | Dout (nGyh−1) |
AEDoutdoor (mSvy−1) |
AEDindoor (mSvy−1) |
Hext | Hint | RLI |
ELCR (X 10−3) |
AGED (mSvy−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAS1 | 102.78 | 53.85 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.86 | 1.76 | 0.39 |
| ASAS2 | 106.39 | 56.38 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.92 | 1.83 | 0.41 |
| ASAS3 | 111.17 | 58.25 | 0.07 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.94 | 1.91 | 0.42 |
| ASAS4 | 144.59 | 75.67 | 0.09 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 1.21 | 2.48 | 0.54 |
| ASAS5 | 121.99 | 63.35 | 0.08 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 1.01 | 2.09 | 0.45 |
| ASAS6 | 97.45 | 50.88 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.81 | 1.67 | 0.37 |
| ASAS7 | 112.62 | 58.79 | 0.07 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.94 | 1.93 | 0.42 |
| ASAS8 | 89.26 | 47.40 | 0.06 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.78 | 1.53 | 0.34 |
| ASAS9 | 96.76 | 51.05 | 0.06 | 0.47 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.82 | 1.66 | 0.36 |
| ASAS10 | 81.30 | 43.30 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.71 | 1.40 | 0.31 |
| ASAS11 | 94.20 | 48.83 | 0.06 | 0.46 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.77 | 1.62 | 0.35 |
| ASAS12 | 105.47 | 55.52 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.90 | 1.81 | 0.40 |
| ASAS13 | 109.56 | 57.85 | 0.07 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.93 | 1.88 | 0.41 |
| ASAS14 | 73.95 | 39.22 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 1.27 | 0.28 |
| ASAS15 | 94.08 | 49.58 | 0.06 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.80 | 1.62 | 0.35 |
| ASAS16 | 137.68 | 73.62 | 0.09 | 0.68 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.21 | 2.36 | 0.53 |
| ASAS17 | 114.63 | 60.57 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.99 | 1.97 | 0.44 |
| ASAS18 | 111.64 | 58.54 | 0.07 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.95 | 1.92 | 0.42 |
| ASAS19 | 131.70 | 70.25 | 0.09 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 1.16 | 2.26 | 0.51 |
| ASAS20 | 89.53 | 47.29 | 0.06 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.77 | 1.54 | 0.34 |
| ASAS21 | 73.33 | 38.52 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.61 | 1.26 | 0.27 |
| ASAS22 | 119.04 | 61.83 | 0.08 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.98 | 2.04 | 0.44 |
| ASAS23 | 98.73 | 52.42 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.86 | 1.70 | 0.38 |
| ASAS24 | 109.72 | 58.36 | 0.07 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.96 | 1.88 | 0.42 |
| ASAS25 | 92.63 | 48.93 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.79 | 1.59 | 0.35 |
| ASAS26 | 100.78 | 53.36 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.87 | 1.73 | 0.38 |
| ASAS27 | 97.58 | 50.89 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.80 | 1.68 | 0.36 |
| ASAS28 | 102.57 | 53.58 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.85 | 1.76 | 0.38 |
| ASAS29 | 102.89 | 53.66 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.86 | 1.77 | 0.38 |
| ASAS30 | 83.17 | 44.60 | 0.05 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 1.43 | 0.32 |
| ASAS31 | 98.56 | 52.23 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.86 | 1.69 | 0.38 |
| ASAS32 | 106.61 | 56.19 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.92 | 1.83 | 0.41 |
| ASAS33 | 82.49 | 43.73 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 1.42 | 0.31 |
| ASAS34 | 98.74 | 50.36 | 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 1.70 | 0.35 |
| ASAS35 | 155.77 | 81.84 | 0.10 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 1.32 | 2.67 | 0.59 |
| ASAS36 | 152.60 | 79.52 | 0.10 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 1.26 | 2.62 | 0.56 |
| ASAS37 | 152.45 | 80.81 | 0.10 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 1.33 | 2.62 | 0.59 |
| ASAS38 | 102.92 | 53.73 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.87 | 1.77 | 0.39 |
| ASAS39 | 92.59 | 48.14 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 1.59 | 0.35 |
| ASAS40 | 104.37 | 54.11 | 0.07 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.86 | 1.79 | 0.39 |
| ASAS41 | 122.94 | 65.53 | 0.08 | 0.60 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 2.11 | 0.47 |
| ASAS42 | 124.22 | 66.21 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 1.08 | 2.13 | 0.47 |
| ASAS43 | 117.01 | 62.01 | 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 1.01 | 2.01 | 0.45 |
| ASAS44 | 118.75 | 63.13 | 0.08 | 0.58 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 1.04 | 2.04 | 0.46 |
| ASAS45 | 136.32 | 71.28 | 0.09 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 1.15 | 2.34 | 0.51 |
| ASAS46 | 136.64 | 71.68 | 0.09 | 0.67 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 1.15 | 2.35 | 0.51 |
| ASAS47 | 124.23 | 65.82 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 1.08 | 2.13 | 0.48 |
| ASAS48 | 121.60 | 64.79 | 0.08 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 1.07 | 2.09 | 0.47 |
| ASAS49 | 94.72 | 50.15 | 0.06 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.82 | 1.63 | 0.36 |
| ASAS50 | 125.22 | 66.41 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 1.07 | 2.15 | 0.47 |
| Min | 73.33 | 38.52 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.61 | 1.26 | 0.27 |
| Max | 155.77 | 81.84 | 0.10 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 1.33 | 2.67 | 0.59 |
| Mean | 109.52 | 57.68 | 0.07 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.93 | 1.88 | 0.41 |
| WORLD LIMIT [31] | 84.00 | 59.00 | 0.07 | 0.41 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 | 3.75 | 0.30 |
The mean value for the Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) was estimated and found to be below the recommended limits of 3.75 × 10−3. The maximum, minimum and mean values of the AGED for the residents using the granite for building are 0.59, 0.27 and 0.41 mSvy-1 respectively. The mean value of the AGED is higher than the recommended limit of 0.32 mSvy-1. This high value of AGED further augmented our worry over the use of the granite from the mine field in Asa LGA for building purposes. The estimated RLI ranges between 1.33 and 0.61 with a mean value of 0.93. The estimated mean value is close to unity, so care should be taken in the use of the granite from this mine field for building. The contributions of 40K, 238U and 232Th to the Raeq, Dout, Din, Hin, Hext, RLI and AGED were investigated and presented in Fig. 3, Fig. 4. It reveals that 40K and 234Th were the chief contributors to the radiological hazards.
Fig. 3.
Contributions of 40K, 238U and 232Th to Dout, Din and Raeq.
Fig. 4.
Contributions of 40K, 238U and 232Th to Hext, Hin, RLI and AGED.
Conclusion
A well calibrated Super-Spec (RS-125) gamma spec was used to measure the activity concentrations of 40K, 238U, 232Th and gamma doses rate over a granite mining field in Asa, Kwara State, North-central Nigeria. The results of the activity concentrations were used to estimate the corresponding radiation hazard parameters to assess the suitability of the granite for building and construction purpose. The results of the activity concentrations showed that the mine field is loaded with thorium and potassium which as a result enhances the outdoor gamma radiation dose rate. The estimated mean values of Din, EADindoor and AGED are above the recommended limits which follows that the danger of indoor gamma radiation exposure is high and the residents may not be safe from indoor ionizing radiation overexposure if the granite is used for building. Other hazard parameters are close to the recommended limits. The study therefore concludes that Nigerian Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) and other regulatory bodies should implement specific statutory requirements and laws to regulate the high rate of mining activities in the State and the country at large. And in accordance with international recommendations quoted in the Basic Safety Series No.115 from the IAEA, the use of building materials containing enhanced concentrations of NORM should be controlled and restricted under the application of the radiation safety standards.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This paper is a part of the research done to assess the radiological risks associated with the mining activities on the general public in Kwara State, Nigeria for which University of Ilorin Staff Development Award (SDA) for PhD program was granted and partial funding which covers survey and transportation was received via the University of Ilorin Institutional Based Research TEDFund program (IBR TEDFund). We also acknowledge the supports enjoyed from the entire staffs of IBRAJ NIGERIA LIMITED and for giving us access to the mine field. At the same time, we acknowledged the publication support received from Covenant University.
References
- 1.United State Environmental Protection Agency “EPA” . 2018. Granite-Countertops-and-Radiation.https://www.epa.gov/radiation/granite-countertops-and-radiation Updated on 3rd December, 2018 and Accessed on 15th February, 2019. Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 2.Usikalu M.R., Maleka P.P., Malik M., Oyeyemi K.D., Adewoyin O.O. Assessment of geogenic natural radionuclide contents of soil samples collected from Ogun State, South western, Nigeria. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2016;14(3):355–361. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ajayi O.S., Ajayi I.R. A survey of environmental gamma radiation levels of some areas of Ekiti and Ondo States, Southwestern Nigeria. Nig. J. Phys. 1999;11(15):17–21. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orosun M.M., Lawal T.O., Ezike S.C., Salawu N.B., Atolagbe B.M., Akinyose F.C., Ige S.O., Martins G. Natural radionuclide concentration and radiological impact assessment of soil and water from Dadinkowa Dam, Northeast Nigeria. J. Niger. Assoc. Math. Phys. 2017;42(1):307–316. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Orosun M.M., Tchokossa P., Lawal T.O., Bello S.O., Ige S.O., Nwankwo L.I. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in drinking water due to mining and smelting activities in Ajaokuta. Niger. J. Technol. Dev. 2016;13:30–38. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Farai I.P., Ademola J.A. Population dose due to building materials in Ibadan, Nigeria. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2001;95:69–73. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ademola J.A. Radionuclide content of concrete building blocks and radiation dose rates in some dwellings in Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Environ. Radioact. 2005;81:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Obed R.I., Farai I.P., Jibiri N.N. Population dose distribution due to soil radioactivity concentration levels in 18 cities across Nigeria. J. Radiol. Prot. 2005;25:305–312. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/25/3/007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ademola A.K., Hammed O.S., Adejumobi C.A. Radioactivity and dose assessment of marble samples from Igbeti mines, Nigeria. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2008;132(1):94–97. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jibiri N.N., Esen N.U. Radionuclide contents and radiological risk to the population due to raw minerals and soil samples from the mining sites of quality ceramic and pottery industries in Akwa Ibom, Nigeria. Radioprotection. 2011;46(1):75–87. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ajayi J.O., Balogun B.B., Olabisi O. Natural radionuclide contents in raw materials and the aggregate finished product from Dangote Cement Plc, Obajana, Kogi State, North Central Nigeria. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012;4(11):959–961. 2012 ISSN: 2041- 0492. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Usikalu M.R., Akinyemi M.L., Achuka J.A. Investigation of radiation levels in soil samples collected from selected locations in Ogun State, Nigeria. IERI Procedia. 2014;9:156–161. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Isinkaye O.M., Jibiri N.N., Olomide A.A. Radiological health assessment of natural radioactivity in the vicinity of Obajana cement factory, North Central Nigeria. J. Med. Phys. 2015;40(1):52–59. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.152256. http://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2015/40/1/52/152256 Available from: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Orosun M.M., Lawal T.O., Akinyose F.C. Natural radionuclide concentrations and radiological impact assessment of soil and water in Tanke-Ilorin, Nigeria. Zimbabwe J. Sci. Technol. 2016;11:158–172. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adagunodo T.A., Hammed O.S., Usikalu M.R., Ayara W.A., Ravisankar R. Data sets on the radiometric Survey over a Kaolinitic Terrain in Dahomey Basin, Nigeria. Data Brief. 2018;2018(18):814–822. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Usikalu M.R., Fuwape I.A., Jatto S.S., Awe O.F., Rabiu A.B., Achuka J.A. Assessment of radiological parameters of soil in Kogi State, Nigeria. Environ. Forensics. 2017;18(1):1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adagunodo T.A., George A.I., Ojoawo I.A., Ojesanmi K., Ravisankar R. Radioactivity and radiological hazards from a kaolin mining field in Ifonyintedo, Nigeria. MethodsX. 2018;5C:362–374. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Usikalu M.R., Oderinde A., Adagunodo T.A., Akinpelu A. Radioactivity concentration and dose assessment of soil samples in cement factory and environs in Ogun State, Nigeria. Int. J. Civil Eng. Technol. 2018;9(9):1047–1059. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adagunodo T.A., Sunmonu L.A., Adabanija M.A., Omeje M., Odetunmibi O.A., Ijeh V. Statistical assessment of radiation exposure risks to farmers in Odo Oba, Southwestern Nigeria. Bull. Miner. Res. Explor. 2019;159:201–217. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Adagunodo T.A., Bayowa O.G., Usikalu M.R., Ojoawo A.I. Radiogenic heat production in the coastal plain sands of Ipokia, Dahomey Basin, Nigeria. MethodsX. 2019;6C:1608–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Usikalu M.R., Maleka P.P., Ndlovu N.B., Zongo S., Achuka J.A., Abodunrin T.J. Radiation dose assessment of soil from Ijero Ekiti, Nigeria. Cogent Eng. 2019;6 1586271. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Omeje M., Adewoyin O.O., Joel E.S., Ehi-Eromosele C.O., Emenike C.P., Usikalu M.R., Akinwumi S.A., Zaidi E., Mohammad A.S. Natural radioactivity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in commercial building materials and their lifetime cancer risk assessment in Dwellers. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2018;24(8):2036–2053. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Anifowoshe A.T., Owolodun O.A., Oyinlola B.O., Abdulganiyu K., Yusuf R.D., Oredein O.A., Iyiola O.A. Incidence of common and rare cancers in Ilorin, Nigeria. Not. Sci. Biol. 2018;10(4):453–459. Print ISSN 2067-3205; Electronic 2067-3264. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oyegun R.O. The use and waste of water in a third world city. GeoJournal. 1985;10(2):205–210. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ibiremo O.S., Ipinmoroti R.R., Ogunlade M.O., Daniel M.A., Iremiren G.O. Assessment of soil fertility for cocoa production in Kwara State: southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria. J. Agric. Sci. 2010;1(1):11–18. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ajadi B.S., Adaramola M.A., Adeniyi A., Abubakar M.I. Effect of effluents discharge on public health in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria. Ethiop. J. Environ. Stud. Manag. 2016;9(4):389. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Megwara J.U., Udensi E.E. Structural analysis using aeromagnetic data: case study of parts of Southern Bida Basin, Nigeria and the surrounding basement rocks. Earth Sci. Res. 2014;3(2) [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kayod J.S., Nawawi M.N.M., Baioumy H.M., Khalil A.E., Khiruddin B.A. 2015. Delineation of the Subsurface Geological Structures of Omu-Aran Area, South-Western Nigeria, Using Aeromagnetic Data. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Usikalu M.R., Onumejor C.A., Akinpelu A., Achuka J.A., Omeje M., Oladapo O.F. Natural radioactivity concentration and its health implication on dwellers in selected locations of Ota. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018;173 [Google Scholar]
- 30.International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) IAEA; Vienna: 1989. Construction and Use of Calibration Facilities for Radiometric Field Equipment. Technical Reports Series No. 309. [Google Scholar]
- 31.UNSCEAR . 2000. “Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionization Radiation” United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes B: Exposures from Natural Radiation Sources New York. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Orosun M.M., Alabi A.B., Olawepo A.O., Orosun R.O., Lawal T.O., Ige S.O. Radiological safety of water from Hadejia River. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 2018;173 [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yu J., Hu X. Post & Telecom Press; Beijing: 2005. Application of Data Statistical Analysis with SPSS; pp. 163–173. [Google Scholar]





