Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Dec 17;28:105004. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105004

Analytical dataset of short-term heat stress induced reshuffling of metabolism and transcriptomes in maize grown under elevated CO2

Jemaa Essemine a, Jikai Li b, Genyun Chen a, Mingnan Qu a,
PMCID: PMC6939058  PMID: 31909108

Abstract

This data article describes the analysis of sudden heat stress (SHS) induced transcriptomes and metabolism in SQ maize cultivar (Zea mays L. cv. Silver Queen). Plants were grown under elevated CO2 in both field based open top chambers (OTCs) and indoor growth chamber conditions [1]. After 20 days after radicle emergence, intact leaf section of maize was exposed for 2 hours to SHS treatment. Samples were stored in liquid nitrogen immediately and used thereafter for metabolism and transcriptomes determinations. Metabolism consisting of 37 targeted metabolites together with corresponding reference standard were determined by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNA integrity was assessed using RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Transcriptomes were determined by Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform. Further interpretation and discussion on these datasets can be found in the related article entitled “Elevated CO2 concentrations may alleviate the detrimental effects of sudden heat stress on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in maize” [1].

Keywords: Metabolism, Transcriptomes, Sudden heat stress, Elevated CO2, Maize


Specifications Table

Subject Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Specific subject area Heat stress induced modulation in metabolism and transcriptomes in maize
Type of data Tables (Microsoft word)
Figures (TIFF format)
How data were acquired GC-MS: gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS; 7890 GC system, 7693 autosampler, 5975C inert XL MSD; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA)
Transcriptomes: Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform
Data format Raw, analyzed and formatted
Parameters for data collection Leaves were obtained from maize plants grown under two conditions, field based OTCs and indoor growth chamber, under either elevated (560 μmol mol−1) or ambient CO2 (380 μmol mol−1). Maize plants were grown under two CO2 treatments for 20 days after radicle emergence they were then subjected to a 2 h sudden heat shock stress.
Description of data collection Following the heat stress, the leaves were immediately immersed into liquid nitrogen for metabolism and transcriptomes.
Data source location Beltsville Agricultural Research Centre (BARC), United State Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service.
Data accessibility Data are presented in this article in the form of figures (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5) and tables (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6).
Related research article Li et al., 2019. Roles of heat shock protein and reprogramming of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in thermotolerance under elevated CO2 in maize. Environ. Exp. Bot.168. doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103869
Value of the Data
  • The experimental data presented herein as well as in Ref. [1] can be used to better understand the response of global gene expression in maize under multiple stress conditions.

  • The generated datasets specifically provide information on the beneficial effect of elevated CO2 on photosynthetic carbon metabolites in response to sudden heat stress treatments.

  • The expression of heat shock protein in response to CO2 treatments can be also learned from this study.

  • Positive relationship regarding the photosynthetic carbon metabolites between field-based open top chambers (OTCs) and indoor growth chamber was investigated herein.

  • The data can be used for reference of metabolite quantification and allow other researchers to extend the statistical analysis.

1. Data

The data collected for SQ maize cultivar exposed to combined effects of elevated CO2 and sudden heat stress is presented in five segments of data: A) The relatedness of biological samples in four combination of CO2 and SHS regarding to transcriptomes and metabolism in field OTCs conditions as shown in Fig. 1; B) Statistical analysis on sequencing quality across all bases from transcriptomes analysis in field OTCs (Figs. 2 and 3; Table 1); C) GO and KEGG analysis on enriched biological pathway involved in SHS and CO2 response (Table 2, Table 3); D) Abundance of heat shock protein based on transcriptomes in different SHS and CO2 treatments in growth chamber (Table 4); E) Photosynthetic carbon metabolites and the gene expression of their catalysing enzymes induced by SHS and CO2 effects (Fig. 4; Table 5, Table 6). The data included herein are based on the experimental results provided in a previous publication by present authors [1].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Relatedness of biological samples of maize leaves exposed to combined SHS and elevated CO2 grown in field. Heatmap of transcriptomes (A) and metabolism (B) in field. Three biological replicates were performed.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Statistical analysis on quality control of samples for transcriptomes across growth chamber and field. Quality scores (A) and sequence contents (B) across all bases were performed based on transcriptomes analysis. Coverage and distribution of mapped reads across gene body were shown in panels C and D, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Statically analysis on distribution density of samples for transcriptomes across growth chamber and field trails. Distribution density regarding reads (A) and genes (B) in whole genome.

Table 1.

Statistical analysis on numbers of reads for maize leaves subjected to different treatments grown under growth chamber and field.

Sample Total reads Total Mapped Multiple mapped Uniquely mapped
Amb_noSHS_GR 44,368328 40,863700 (92.10%) 1,916847 (4.32%) 38,946853 (87.78%)
Amb_SHS_GR 47,988,680 44,721,762 (93.19%) 1,845,032 (3.84%) 42,876,730 (89.35%)
Elv_noSHS_GR 45735862 41343632 (90.40%) 2,182589 (4.77%) 39,161043 (85.62%)
Elv_SHS_GR 46,357,682 42,675427 (92.06%) 2,028225 (4.38%) 40,647202 (87.68%)
Amb_noSHS_Field 44,677962 41,109030 (92.01%) 1,968769 (4.41%) 39,140261 (87.61%)
Amb_SHS_Field 46,396662 42,652023 (91.93%) 1,953693 (4.21%) 40,698330 (87.72%)
Elv_noSHS_Field 47,617920 43,657634 (91.68%) 1,874869 (3.94%) 41,782765 (87.75%)
Elv_SHS_Field 47911496 43,937795 (91.71%) 1,901400 (3.97%) 42,036395 (87.74%)

Table 2.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis on biological pathway enriched from differentially expressed genes induced by SHS with up-regulation of elevated CO2.

GO ID Term Category P valule Enrichment score
GO:0006351 transcription, DNA-templated biological_process 1.49E-07 1.44015704
GO:0009737 response to abscisic acid biological_process 9.24E-07 2.43903502
GO:0010,161 red light signaling pathway biological_process 2.12E-06 19.6231454
GO:0006021 inositol biosynthetic process biological_process 2.33E-06 10.9017474
GO:0070,413 trehalose metabolism in response to stress biological_process 4.84E-06 5.98038717
GO:0006952 defense response biological_process 5.87E-06 1.82692626
GO:0006741 NADP biosynthetic process biological_process 1.03E-05 15.6985163
GO:0005992 trehalose biosynthetic process biological_process 1.95E-05 5.10520856
GO:0080,163 regulation of protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity biological_process 2.65E-05 7.69535114
GO:0010,072 primary shoot apical meristem specification biological_process 2.65E-05 7.69535114
GO:0005886 plasma membrane cellular_component 4.63E-05 1.34131818
GO:0070,449 elongin complex cellular_component 0.00022,912 8.72139796
GO:0005779 integral component of peroxisomal membrane cellular_component 0.00156,164 5.60661297
GO:0005615 extracellular space cellular_component 0.00264,417 2.25877933
GO:0005887 integral component of plasma membrane cellular_component 0.00347,733 1.71231635
GO:0005578 proteinaceous extracellular matrix cellular_component 0.0044,664 3.60885433
GO:0048,046 apoplast cellular_component 0.00729,448 1.60063304
GO:0003700 transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding molecular_function 1.24E-14 1.95021467
GO:0004512 inositol-3-phosphate synthase activity molecular_function 8.05E-08 16.3526212
GO:0004760 serine-pyruvate transaminase activity molecular_function 8.08E-08 20.9313551
GO:0050,281 serine-glyoxylate transaminase activity molecular_function 8.08E-08 20.9313551
GO:0004445 inositol-polyphosphate 5-phosphatase activity molecular_function 4.69E-07 17.4427959
GO:0052,658 inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase activity molecular_function 4.69E-07 17.4427959
GO:0052,659 inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate 5-phosphatase activity molecular_function 4.69E-07 17.4427959
GO:0043,565 sequence-specific DNA binding molecular_function 1.39E-06 1.85799281
GO:0016,161 beta-amylase activity molecular_function 1.62E-06 9.23442136
GO:0003951 NAD+ kinase activity molecular_function 1.03E-05 15.6985163

Table 3.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis on metabolic pathway enriched from differentially expressed genes induced by SHS with up-regulation of elevated CO2.

KEGG ID Term P value Enrichment score
path:zma00062 Fatty acid elongation 0.00021,537 5.534060847
path:zma00760 Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism 0.00068,782 6.896291209
path:zma00500 Starch and sucrose metabolism 0.0012,358 2.668207908
path:zma02010 ABC transporters 0.00124,559 5.976785714
path:zma00052 Galactose metabolism 0.00127,888 4.038,368,726
path:zma00650 Butanoate metabolism 0.00206,036 5.273634454
path:zma00710 Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms 0.00358,693 3.320436508
path:zma00630 Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism 0.00551,224 3.049380466
path:zma00562 Inositol phosphate metabolism 0.00571,992 2.758516484
path:zma00600 Sphingolipid metabolism 0.01022607 3.448145604
path:zma00250 Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism 0.01244944 2.846088435
path:zma00280 Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation 0.02105207 2.801618304
path:zma00051 Fructose and mannose metabolism 0.02133673 2.490327381
path:zma00940 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis 0.02318281 1.854864532
path:zma04146 Peroxisome 0.0239,811 2.230143923
path:zma00564 Glycerophospholipid metabolism 0.02896395 2.01464687
path:zma00270 Cysteine and methionine metabolism 0.03275973 2.075272817
path:zma04016 MAPK signaling pathway - plant 0.03674623 1.83497807
path:zma00030 Pentose phosphate pathway 0.03702845 2.359257519
path:zma00260 Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism 0.05842218 2.037540584

Table 4.

Transcripts from RNAseq and qPCR results in terms of 17 Heat shock protein gene family in indoor growth chambers. no ch.: means no change.

Maize ID Gene annotation Gene abbre. log2FC (SHS/ck) Significant Regulate Log2FC (eCO2/aCO2) Significant Regulate Orthologue in Arabidopsis
GRMZM2G458208 cpn1 - chaperonin 1 Cpn1 1.9 yes up −0.284 no no ch. AT3G23990
GRMZM2G416120 cpn2 - chaperonin2 Cpn2 0.5356 yes up 2.4825 yes up AT3G23990
GRMZM2G310431 hsp1 - heat shock protein1 Hsp1 0.4664 yes up 3.9482 yes up AT3G12580
Zm00001d028555 hsp10 - heat shock protein10 Hsp10 0.3535 yes up −1.384 no down AT1G47890
GRMZM2G306679 hsp11 - heat shock protein11 Hsp11 0.4522 yes up −0.9482 no no ch. AT1G53540
GRMZM2G422240 hsp17.2 - heat shock protein17.2 Hsp17.2 0.2553 yes up 3.4858 yes up AT5G12020
GRMZM2G404249 hsp18a - 18 kda heat shock protein18a Hsp18a 0.21,093 yes up 5.92,874 yes up AT5G59720
GRMZM2G034157 hsp18c - heat shock protein18c Hsp18c 0.21,985 yes up 0.9482 no no ch. AT5G12020
GRMZM2G083810 hsp18f - heat shock protein18f Hsp18f 0.2052 yes up 2.4924 yes up AT5G12020
GRMZM2G007729 hsp22 - heat shock protein22 Hsp22 0.2132 yes up 2.94,823 yes up AT5G51440
GRMZM2G149647 hsp26 - heat shock protein26 Hsp26 0.1942 yes up −1.94,824 no no ch. AT4G27670
GRMZM6G199466 hsp3 - heat shock protein3 Hsp3 0.0942 yes up −0.928 no no ch. EFH47634.1
GRMZM2G069651 hsp4 - heat shock protein4 Hsp4 −0.042 no no ch. 0.09482 no no ch. AT1G53540
GRMZM2G340251 hsp70-4 - heat shock protein70-4 Hsp70 0.0486 no no ch. 0.0838 no no ch. AT5G56000
GRMZM2G080724 hsp8 - heat shock protein8 Hsp8 0.095 yes up 1.2948 no no ch. AT4G27670
GRMZM2G046382 hsp9 - heat shock protein9 Hsp9 0.1821 yes up 1.94,823 no no ch. AT1G47890
GRMZM5G833699 hsp90 - heat shock protein, 90 kDa Hsp90 0.1284 yes up 0.098,482 no no ch. AT5G52640

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison on metabolites involved in serine and threonine metabolic pathways reprogrammed following combined SHS and elevated CO2. Three biological replicates were carried out.

Table 5.

Targeted metabolites relevant to metabolic pathways enriched by GO and KEGG analysis with CO2 thermal-mitigation effects in indoor growth chambers.

Cluster # Metabolites Amb_noSHS
Elv_noSHS
Amb_SHS
Elv-SHS
Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E.
Carbohydrates 1 starch 9.845a 0.041 11.682a 0.046 1.517c 0.020 3.330b 0.027
2 sucrose 77.723a 1.330 66.872a 1.624 79.764a 1.921 76.602a 1.638
3 trehalose 0.331a 0.003 0.437a 0.006 0.166b 0.004 0.346a 0.003
4 fructose 12.148b 0.323 16.621a 0.437 5.259c 0.349 11.518b 0.358
5 mannose 1.618a 0.013 1.422a 0.021 0.580b 0.012 0.671b 0.020
Amino acids 1 valine 0.213b 0.021 0.254b 0.005 0.894a 0.139 1.364a 0.136
2 leucine 0.346c 0.035 0.301c 0.030 0.765b 0.077 1.038a 0.104
3 isoleucine 0.138c 0.014 0.158bc 0.006 0.183b 0.018 0.249a 0.025
4 glycine 1.427b 0.019 1.267b 0.015 1.934a 0.033 2.108a 0.031
5 threonine 2.747b 0.315 2.821b 0.322 3.209a 0.321 3.399a 0.340
6 alanine 2.014b 0.295 2.083b 0.302 3.010a 0.301 3.564a 0.319
7 serine 0.850b 0.109 0.967ab 0.117 1.102a 0.110 1.479a 0.118
Organic acids 1 glyoxylate 0.551c 0.019 0.548c 0.017 1.837b 0.007 2.216a 0.011
2 aspartate 7.891a 0.037 7.379a 0.033 6.289b 0.078 6.121b 0.071
3 glutamate 5.232c 0.064 3.867d 0.052 8.807a 0.127 6.604b 0.101
4 pyruvate 0.648b 0.017 0.773b 0.021 0.106a 0.018 0.155a 0.018
5 citrate 1.063a 0.016 1.027a 0.019 0.105b 0.016 0.255b 0.017

Note: Metabolic responses of maize leaves to CO2 and heat stress treatments were presented as: ambient CO2 with non-heat stress (Amb_noSHS), elevated CO2 with non-heat stress (Elv_noSHS), ambient CO2 with heat stress (Amb_SHS), elevated CO2 with heat stress (Elv-SHS). One-way ANOVA was used to estimate the significant effects of CO2 and heat stress on each metabolite in maize leaves, while different alphabet letters represent significant difference at P < 0.05.

Table 6.

FPKMs from RNAseq relating to carbon assimilation metabolic pathways in indoor growth chambers.

Maize ID Gene name Abbreviation Amb_noSHS Elv_noSHS Amb_SHS Elv_SHS log2FC(SHS/ck)
GRMZM2G069486 β-amylase AMY8 9.088 18.398 2.682 14.324 0.537
GRMZM2G068943 Trahalose 6-phosopate synthase TPS 0.381 0.414 0.147 0.314 0.572
GRMZM6G477257 Phosphoglucose isomerase PGI 12.682 18.701 6.325 17.263 0.711
GRMZM2G129246 Glycolate oxidase GO1 0.402 0.449 0.846 1.170 2.356
GRMZM2G382914 Phosphoglycerate kinase PGK2 0.613 0.759 0.182 0.290 0.340
GRMZM2G438998 Mannose phosphate isomerase MPI 1.550 2.257 0.639 1.801 0.605
GRMZM2G053939 Alanine transaminase GPT2 2.208 2.260 2.130 2.200 0.969
GRMZM2G452630 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase SHMT 1.363 1.197 1.853 1.910 1.477
GRMZM2G473001 PEP kinase PEPC 1.181 1.159 1.110 1.015 0.908
GRMZM2G407044 Acetolactate synthase ALS 0.349 0.312 0.621 0.730 2.059
GRMZM2G094939 Pyruvate dehydrogenase PDH 0.289 0.408 0.275 0.203 0.724
GRMZM2G064023 Citrate synthase CS1 1.353 1.582 0.654 1.365 0.673
GRMZM2G142863 2-oxoglutarte dehydrogenase OGDH 1.015 1.048 0.278 0.097 0.184
GRMZM2G178415 Glutamate dehydrogenase GLUD1 4.893 4.864 7.371 6.991 1.472
GRMZM2G146677 Aspartate transaminase AST 7.736 7.547 6.397 6.566 0.848
GRMZM2G050570 Threonine synthase TS2 0.270 0.250 0.275 0.267 1.043

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

2.1. Materials and growth condition

SQ Corn seeds were supplied by the maize germplasm information resources from the United States of America, USA (GRIN: http://www.ars-grin.gov/). Experiments were conducted in both fields-based open top chambers (OTCs), and indoor conditions. The location of field is at Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC), USDA-ARS (39–00′ N, 76–56′W). The designed 4/4 random blocks for the experiment are as displayed in Fig. 5A. After germination, Corn seedlings were sown in 16 OTCs. The dimension for each OTC is: 2 m long, 2 m width and 2 m height (Fig. 5B). The interval between chambers is uniformly spaced by 2 m, to minimize shading effect. Maize seedlings for 7 days after radicle emergence were transplanted and spaced by 15 cm between each other as well. The soil in each OTC keeps moist by watering once a week. Plants in OTC are exposed to ambient air or ambient air plus 180 ppm CO2, as described elsewhere [2].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Field experimental design and set-up. (A) 4 × 4 randomized block design for field-open top chamber (OTCs) experiments. Ambient and elevated CO2 chambers were shown in grey and yellow cells, respectively. (B) Image of field OTCs. (C) Image of water-jacketed leaf cuvettes. (D) Image of maize grown under ambient (left) and elevated (right) CO2 conditions for 20 days.

For indoor chambers, plants were grown under either ambient CO2 (380 μmol mol−1) or high CO2 (560 μmol mol−1) concentrations, as described earlier [3]. Day and night temperatures were 29/17 °C, with soil temperature average of 25.7 ± 0.33 °C/14.8 ± 0.41 °C day/night. The light intensity and photoperiod were 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 and 12/12 h, respectively. Local air humidity was 60% during the day time.

2.2. Experimental design

SQ corn variety grown in fields OTCs and growth chambers for 20 days under ambient and high concentrations of CO2 as mentioned above. The marked part of the whole intact leaves is placed in a water jacketed leaf chamber (Fig. 5C), with the internal radiator and fan for 2 hours of SHS treatment as described earlier [4]. By circulating heated water from the temperature control tank to the leaf cuvettes (Fig. 5C), the air temperature in the cuvette could increase to approximately 45 °C. Air from the OTCs is constantly flushed through each leaf cuvette. Untreated or heat-treated leaves were immediately stored in liquid nitrogen for transcription and metabolic analysis.

2.3. Metabolism measurements

Leaves from six different plants around 20-day old were used (Fig. 5D) for metabolic measurements. ∼30 mg leaf tissue with frozen dried is squashed by adding 3.2 mm ceramic beads and 100 μl fine pomegranate powder in 2.0 mL Eppendorf tube, followed by homogeniztion with a Tissue Lyzer ball mill at 30 cycles s−1 as previously described [4]. The squashed samples were subsequently dissolved using 50 μl mixture consisting of 2.5 mM alpha-aminobutyric acid, 2.0 mg ribitol and 1.4 mL cold 70% methanol and vortexed. Then the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 45 °C for 15 min. After centrifugation for 5 min at 12,000 g, super-fluid was gently transferred to a 15 mL fresh conical plastic centrifuge tube. The particles are washed once with 70% methanol, and the supernatants were combined with prevoius step. Finally, the mixed supernatants were air-dried overnight and used for determination of starch as previously described [5]. Organic acids, amino acids and soluble carbohydrates were measured by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) as described elsewhere [6]. Derived samples are performed by GC-MS equipped with mass selective detection (7890 GC system, 7693 automatic sampler, 5975C idle XL MSD). Total ion chromatograms obtained were quantified using Agilent MSD Chemstation software program. Independent standard curves were prepared for each set of extractions with known mixtures of organic acids, amino acids and soluble carbohydrates. Ribitol added during extraction process as internal standard. Compounds in organic acid fraction: 2-oxoglutaric, quinic acid, adipic acid, shikimate, pyruvate, citrate, aconitate, maleic acid, malate, oxalic acid, malonic acid, glyoxylate, fumarate and succinate. Compounds in soluble carbohydrate fraction were: ribose, fructose, glucose, myo-inositol, sucrose, maltose, mannose, trehalose, raffinose and starch. The compounds present in amino acids fraction: leucine, Isoleucine, alanine, glycine, serine, valine, threonine, proline, putrescine, aspartate, glutamate and phenylalaine. Five biological replicates, with three technique replicates for each biological one, were conducted for metabolic measurements. Values of standard error (SE) were calculated based on data from three technique and five biological replicates. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) via software SPSS 10.0 (SPSS Inc., USA) was applied to identify significant differences between heat stress and CO2 treatments for specific metabolite in SQ maize cultivar leaves.

2.4. Transcriptomes measurements

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® reagents, following manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Quality and purity of RNA were determined by 1% of agarose gels and nano-drop (IMPLEN, California, USA), respectively. RNA integrity was evaluated via Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, California, USA). The total amount of RNA per sample was normalized to 1.5 μg, which was used as an input for RNA sequencing. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext® UltraTMRNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA). Sequencing libraries was featured by Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform with 150bp pair-read was generated [7]. The original read was aligned with B73 reference genome (RefGen_v3), using TopHat2.0.8 and STAR, with a minimum inner length set to 20bp. The gene and heterogeneous are quantified using the GTF annotation file generated by PacBio sequencing. To reduce transcription noise, gene is included only if FPKM value is < 0.01. The value is selected based on the genetic coverage saturation analysis as reported previously [8].

Acknowledgments

We thank Shanghai Orizmes Biotech Co. Ltd. and Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co., Ltd. for technical service on metabolic determinations and transcriptomes analysis. This work was supported in part by Chinese Strategic Leading project category B (XDB27020105), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700201) and Sailing Project, Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission, China (17YF1421800), Chinese Strategic Leading project category A (XDA08020301).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Li J., Essemine J., Bunce J.A., Shang C., Zhang H., Sun D., Chen G., Qu M. Roles of heat shock protein and reprogramming of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in thermotolerance under elevated CO2 in maize. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019;168 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qu M., Chen G., Bunce J.A., Zhu X., Sicher R.C. Systematic biology analysis on photosynthetic carbon metabolism of maize leaf following sudden heat shock under elevated CO2. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:7849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26283-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bunce J.A. How do leaf hydraulics limit stomatal conductance at high water vapour pressure deficits? Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:1644–1650. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koussevitzky S., Suzuki N., Huntington S., Armijo L., Sha W., Cortes D., Shulaev V., Mittler R. Ascorbate peroxidase 1 plays a key role in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to stress combination. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283(49):34197–34203. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806337200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sicher R.C., Bunce J.A. Growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen partitioning and responses to CO2 enrichment in a barley mutant lacking NADH-dependent nitrate reductase activity. Physiol. Plant. 2008;134(1):31–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roessner U., Wagner C., Kopka J., Trethewey R.N., Willmitzer L. Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Plant J. 2000;23(1):131–142. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Trapnell C., Roberts A., Goff L., Pertea G., Kim D., Kelley D.R. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang H.R., Xu X., Vieira F.G., Xiao Y.H., Li Z.K., Wang J. The power of inbreeding: NGS-based GWAS of rice reveals convergent evolution during rice domestication. Mol. Plant. 2016;9(7):975–985. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES