Skip to main content
Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology
. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):539. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.189878

Erratum: Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation

PMCID: PMC6939548  PMID: 31920241

In the article titled “Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation”, published on pages 348-352, Issue 3, Volume 35 of Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology,[1] the name of the second author is written incorrectly as “Dalal G Priti” instead of “Priti G Dalal”.

The “How to cite this article” section should read correctly as “Bruceta MA, Dalal PG, McAllister P, Prozesky J, Vaida SJ, Budde AO. Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2019;35:348-52”

Reference

  • 1.Bruceta MA, Priti DG, McAllister P, Prozesky J, Vaida SJ, Budde AO. Ambu AuraGain versus intubating laryngeal tube suction as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019;35:348–52. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_214_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES