Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2019 Dec 20;98(51):e18437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018437

Can the basal serum thyroglobulin level be used to predict the recombinant human TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin level in differentiated patients with thyroid cancer?

Eugene Jeong a, Joon-Kee Yoon a, Su Jin Lee a, Euy Young Soh b, Jeonghun Lee b, Hyeung Kyoo Kim b, Young-Sil An a,∗
Editor: Gaurav Malhotra
PMCID: PMC6940117  PMID: 31861014

Abstract

This study investigated the correlation between basal thyroglobulin (Tg) and recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH)-stimulated Tg in differentiated patients with thyroid cancer, and sought to determine whether the basal Tg level predicts the rhTSH-stimulated Tg level.

We retrospectively enrolled 177 patients with papillary thyroid cancer (mean age = 44 years; 50 males, 127 females) who received rhTSH before radioiodine therapy (RIT). Serum Tg levels were measured 7 days before the 1st rhTSH injection (basal Tg) and on the days of RIT (rhTSH-stimulated Tg). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to rhTSH-stimulated Tg cut-off levels of 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL. The correlation between basal Tg and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels was assessed, and whether basal Tg was useful in predicting the rhTSH-stimulated Tg level was determined.

A significant positive correlation was observed between basal and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels (|rho| = 0.48, P < .0001). The basal Tg level had significant diagnostic ability in predicting an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 2 ng/mL or higher, and the optimal basal Tg level for this prediction was 0.3 ng/mL (AUC = 0.77, P < .0001). A basal Tg level of 0.5 ng/mL was optimal for predicting rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels of 5 ng/mL or higher (AUC = 0.81, P < .0001), and of 10 ng/mL or higher (AUC = 0.82, P = .0171).

The basal Tg level was significantly correlated with the rhTSH-stimulated Tg level. If the basal Tg level is >0.3 or 0.5 ng/mL, then the rhTSH-stimulated Tg level can be expected to be sufficiently high to necessitate clinical examination.

Keywords: papillary, recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin, thyroid cancer

1. Introduction

Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are typically treated with total thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine therapy (RIT), using I-131, for thyroid remnant ablation.[1] Although patients with DTC generally have a good prognosis, relapse, or distant metastasis may occur within the first 5 years after treatment, necessitating clinical follow-up.[2] Thyroglobulin (Tg) is a highly specific tumor marker in the management of DTC. An increase in the serum Tg level after RIT is an early and reliable indicator of local recurrence or metastasis.

In patients with DTC, Tg level with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation (≥30 mU/L), which is considered to be a significant tumor marker.[3] Such TSH elevation can be achieved by inducing hypothyroidism after discontinuing thyroid hormones for approximately 4 to 5 weeks. This traditional thyroid hormone withdrawal method causes hypothyroid symptoms persisting for weeks to months in most patients, damaging their physical and psychologic health and thus decreasing quality of life.[4,5] Exogeneous stimulation with recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) has been approved to measure Tg levels as an alternative to thyroid hormone withdrawal; it strongly stimulates iodine uptake and Tg production without inducing the side effects associated with hypothyroidism. Numerous studies[6–8] have indicated that rhTSH and thyroid hormone withdrawal are equally effective as markers of recurrence. In addition, rhTSH appears to decrease the radiation exposure of extra-thyroid tissues and red marrow after ablation.[9–12] The therapeutic use of rhTSH has been approved by the European Thyroid Association for low-risk patients; it was also proposed as an alternative to hormone withdrawal by the American Thyroid Association.[13]

Recently, several clinicians have followed-up patients with DTC to determine the reliability of basal Tg values, with the goal of reducing the burden of thyroid hormone withdrawal.[14–16] In addition, measuring rhTSH-stimulated Tg is costly, so we use basal Tg as a tumor marker in daily clinical practice. However, there are still doubts regarding how well basal Tg reflects TSH-stimulated Tg, and how seriously basal Tg levels should be taken as a marker of recurrence or metastasis. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the basal Tg level (without TSH stimulation) and the rhTSH-stimulated Tg level. We also examined the clinical utility of basal Tg levels for predicting the risk of future recurrence, and sought to determine the optimal basal Tg threshold.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Subjects

This study included patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (n = 177) who were transferred to our department between March 2016 and March 2018 for RIT after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 44 years, and about 72% were women. All patients received 2 intramuscular injections of 0.9 mg rhTSH (Thyrogen; Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA), 24 and 48 hours before RIT without discontinuation of levothyroxine. The blood sampling was done 7 days before, and 48 hours after, the 1st rhTSH injection (Fig. 1). We collected the patients’ clinical information through a chart review and the cancer stages were established based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition.[17] All patients included in this study had cervical lymph nodes metastases (N1a or N1b), which required postoperative RIT.[3] They had no clinical suspicion of distant metastasis prior to RIT and were in the M0 stage. Patients with a basal blood antithyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) level >60 IU/mL in were excluded from this study. To facilitate statistical analysis, a Tg of <0.1 ng/mL was recorded as zero.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic of blood sampling. The blood tests for checking basal thyroglobulin (Tg) were performed 7 days before the first injection of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH). The blood test to evaluate rhTSH-stimulated Tg was performed 48 hours after the first rhTSH injection.

The clinical design of this retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ajou University (AJIRB-MED-MDB-18-224). The need for informed consent was waived.

2.2. Laboratory measurements

Serum TSH concentrations was measured by immunoradiometric assay using a sandwich-type assay (TSH IRMA kit; Beckman Coulter, Prague, Czech Republic). Serum Tg was checked using Tg-S IRMA CT (ZenTech, Angleur, Belgium). Serum TgAb was measured with a radioligand assay for quantitative determination of antibodies to Tg in human serum (BRAHMS anti-Tg RIA kit; Thermo Scientific, Hennigsdorf, Germany).

2.3. Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were done using MedCalc Statistical Software (ver. 18.5; MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). First, we performed a power analysis to calculate the appropriate sample size for this study using a significance (a) level of 5% and statistical power (1-b) of 80%. A sample size of 145 was required to attain an appropriate confidence level; thus, the sample size of our study (n = 177) was sufficient.

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess whether our dataset differed significantly from a normal distribution. Data with a normal distribution are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD), and data that do not follow a normal distribution are presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Statistical methods were applied according to whether the data were parametric or nonparametric.

Spearman coefficient of rank correlation test was used to examine the correlation between basal and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels. Correlations were classified as very weak (|rho| < 0.20), weak (|rho| = 0.20–0.39), moderate (|rho| = 0.40–0.59), strong (|rho| = 0.60–0.79), or very strong (|rho| ≥ 0.80).[18]

Patients were grouped according to rhTSH-stimulated Tg cut-off levels of 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL, which can be considered to indicate remaining cancer cells.[3,19,20] We used univariate logistic regression analysis to determine the significant risk factors for exceeding each rhTSH-stimulated Tg cut-off. Furthermore, multiple stepwise regression was used to search for independent risk factors. The diagnostic efficacy of basal Tg level for predicting rhTSH-stimulated Tg level was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was compared with 0.5, and the value with the highest Youden index was used as the cut-off value. All P-values <.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ characteristics

Regarding the AJCC stage, 80.2% of patients (142/177) were stage I and 19.2% (34/177) were stage II. Basal Tg was examined postoperatively after a median of 95 days. Among all patients, the median basal Tg level was 0.0 ng/mL and the median rhTSH-stimulated Tg level was 0.5 ng/mL. The detailed clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients.

3.1.

Open in a new tab

3.2. Correlation between basal and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels

The Spearman coefficient of rank correlation rho value between basal and rhTSH-stimulated Tg was 0.48. The 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged from 0.36 to 0.59. The associated P-value was <.0001, suggesting a positive relationship between basal and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Correlation between basal thyroglobulin (Tg) and recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH)-stimulated Tg. Spearman coefficient of rank correlation analysis showed a moderate positive correlation between basal Tg and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels (P < .0001, |rho| = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36–0.59).

3.3. Regression analyses for risk factors for rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels

With a cut-off rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 2 ng/mL, 137 patients were in the risk-free group (rhTSH-stimulated Tg < 2 ng/mL) and 40 were in the risk group (rhTSH-stimulated Tg ≥ 2 ng/mL). In the univariate regression analysis, male (P = .0249), advanced T stage (T3 and T4; P = .0267), higher basal TSH level (P = .0325), and higher basal Tg level (P < .0001) were risk factors for an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 2 ng/mL or higher. Using a cut-off rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 5 ng/mL, 158 patients were in the nonrisk group (rhTSH-stimulated Tg < 5 ng/mL) and 19 were in the risk group (rhTSH-stimulated Tg ≥ 5 ng/mL). The risk of an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 5 ng/mL or higher was significantly greater in males than in females (P = .0041). An advanced T stage (P = .0162), high basal TSH level (P = .0393) and high basal Tg level (P < .0001) were also significant risk factors for a high rhTSH-stimulated Tg level. When the cut-off level of rhTSH-stimulated Tg was 10 ng/mL, 172 subjects were included in the nonrisk group (rhTSH-stimulated Tg < 10 ng/mL) and the remaining 5 (rhTSH-stimulated Tg ≥ 10 ng/mL) were in the risk group. In the risk analysis based on an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 10 ng/mL, only basal Tg was a statistically significant contributor to the risk of a high rhTSH-stimulated Tg level (P = .0006). The detailed results of the univariate regression analysis are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors predicting the various rhTSH-stimulated Tg level groups.

3.3.

Open in a new tab

In the multivariate regression analysis, higher basal Tg level and advanced T stage were independent risk factors for an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 2 ng/mL or higher and 5 ng/mL or higher. Only the basal Tg level was a statistically significant risk factor for an rhTSH-stimulated Tg cut-off level of 10 ng/mL or higher (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors predicting the various rhTSH-stimulated Tg level groups.

3.3.

Open in a new tab

3.4. ROC curve analysis results

In ROC curve analysis, basal Tg level had a statistically significant ability to predict an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 2 ng/mL or higher (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70–0.83, P < .0001). The optimal basal Tg value for this prediction was 0.3 ng/mL, with 67.5% sensitivity and 83.2% specificity (Fig. 3A). When risk groups were distinguished according to an rhTSH-stimulated Tg cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, basal Tg again had a statistically significant ability to predict risk group (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75–0.87, P < .0001). In this case, the optimal basal Tg value for this prediction was 0.5 ng/mL, with sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 84.8% (Fig. 3B). Finally, basal Tg level had a statistically significant ability to predict an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level of 10 ng/mL or higher (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76–0.87, P = .0171). A basal Tg level of 0.5 ng/mL was optimal for this prediction, with sensitivity and specificity of 80.0% and 80.2%, respectively (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of basal thyroglobulin (Tg) for predicting risk groups based on cut-off recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH)-stimulated Tg. Basal Tg values had significant diagnostic ability in predicting rhTSH-stimulated-Tg levels equal to or exceeding 2 (A), 5 (B), and 10 ng/mL (C).

4. Discussion

There have been few studies on the relationship between basal Tg and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels. A study by Spencer et al[21] demonstrated that basal Tg level was strongly correlated with rhTSH-stimulated Tg level (r = 0.85). In our study, the trend was not as strong, but there was a significant correlation between basal Tg and rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels. Our study included a well-controlled, homogenous sample with constant blood sampling interval and timing. Future studies with larger sample sizes may demonstrate this relationship more clearly.

We used several TSH-stimulated Tg cut-off values in our study. According to the American Thyroid Association guidelines, a serum Tg level exceeding 2 ng/mL following TSH elevation is considered significant to warrant further investigation of DTC recurrence.[3] Most authors agree that if the rhTSH-stimulated Tg level remains below 2 ng/mL, the likelihood of detectable recurrence is small.[22] Furthermore, when Tg levels are above 5 ng/mL after rhTSH stimulation, therapeutic RIT should be considered, even if all the imaging studies are negative.[23–25] Schluter et al[26] indicated that a TSH-stimulated Tg level exceeding 10 ng/mL could be used a cut-off point for implementation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. Momesso and Tuttle[27] defined a biochemically incomplete response as a TSH-stimulated Tg level >10 ng/mL. We believe that all of these cut-offs, of 2, 5, and 10 ng/mL, are clinically meaningful, so applied all 3 in this study.

Our study found that sex, advanced T-stage, and high basal Tg level were risk factors for rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels of 2 ng/mL or higher and 5 ng/mL or higher. In the patients included in our study, the proportion of female was about 2.5 times higher than in male, which is not surprising based on previous reports that the incidence of thyroid cancer is 2.9 times higher in women than in men.[28,29] Sex and tumor size are well-known prognostic factors of DTC,[30,31] consistent with our findings. It is important to note that the independent risk factor for exceeding all rhTSH-stimulated Tg cut-offs in our multivariate analysis was the basal Tg value. Although it is well known that serum Tg level is an important marker for predicting disease progression in patients with DTC,[32,33] it was unclear whether basal Tg had sufficient predictive power to replace the TSH-stimulated Tg test. Our results have shown that basal Tg can play an important role in predicting elevated rhTSH-stimulated Tg levels, which may be clinically useful.

Our data also suggested 0.3 ng/mL as an appropriate basal Tg cut-off for predicting an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level above 2 ng/mL. This basal Tg level is almost identical to the 0.28 ng/mL suggested by Trimboli et al[16] and matches the level of 0.3 ng/mL mentioned by Rosario et al,[34] which enhances its reliability. In both of those previous studies, persistent disease was rarely present when the basal Tg level was <0.28 and 0.3 ng/mL, respectively, such that it is not necessary to check the TSH-stimulated Tg level in these cases.[16,34] Here we present another basal Tg cut-off level, of 0.5 ng/mL, which may be useful for predicting an rhTSH-stimulated Tg level exceeding 5 or 10 ng/mL. We found no previous study suggesting that 0.5 ng/mL is a dangerous basal Tg level. TSH-stimulated Tg cut-off values of 5 and 10 ng/mL are mainly used to determine the RIT dose, or in a clinical context to assess the response after RIT. We cautiously suggest that a basal Tg level of 0.5 ng/mL may be more meaningful than 0.3 ng/mL for clinicians dealing with RIT patients.

The limitations of this study were as follows. First, the timing of the rhTSH-stimulated Tg measurement was not consistent with the recommended sampling time. It is widely known that serum Tg levels should be measured at 72 hours after the second rhTSH injection. Unfortunately, we evaluated serum Tg levels at 48 hours after the 1st rhTSH injection, where the blood sampling timing could not be adjusted as this study was conducted retrospectively. The reasons for this earlier sampling point than the standard guideline are because it is inconvenient for patients to visit the hospital again for a blood test after RIT, and there is a risk to laboratory staff of radiation exposure while sampling blood from post-RIT patients. In fact, a recent study by Sager et al[35] reported little difference between Tg values at day 3 after the 1st rhTSH injection date (equivalent to the time of the blood sampling in this study) and day 5 (equivalent to the standard guideline), such that a day 5 blood sample may not be necessary. Thus, there is still debate about the timing of blood tests after rTSH injection. However, we admit that the risk of an elevated rhTSH-stimulated Tg level may have been underestimated in this study due to the early timing of blood sampling, and a well-designed prospective study will be needed for validation of our findings. Another limitation of this study was the lack of patient outcome data. DTC is known to have a good prognosis,[36] and the study period was too short to analyze prognosis or survival in our patients according to recurrence or metastasis. Thus, we will conduct a continuous follow-up study including clinical outcome data. The final limitation was that this study lacked data on the amount of remnant thyroid tissue prior to RIT. Remnant thyroid tissue may contribute to Tg production,[37,38] which may have influenced our results. Unfortunately, our institution did not perform ultrasonography prior to RIT, and we did not obtain data on remnant thyroid tissue. To further clarify our results, prospective studies including data on remnant thyroid tissue are needed in the future.

The main conclusion of this study is that the basal Tg level (without TSH stimulation) was significantly correlated with the rhTSH-simulated Tg level, and the rhTSH-simulated Tg level appears clinically meaningful when the basal Tg value is ≥0.3 or 0.5 ng/mL.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Eugene Jeong, Young-Sil An.

Data curation: Joon-Kee Yoon MD, Su Jin Lee, Euy Young Soh, Hyeung Kyoo Kim.

Formal analysis: Su Jin Lee, Jeonghun Lee.

Investigation: Eugene Jeong, Euy Young Soh, Jeonghun Lee, Young-Sil An.

Methodology: Joon-Kee Yoon MD, Young-Sil An.

Resources: Joon-Kee Yoon MD, Su Jin Lee, Hyeung Kyoo Kim.

Writing – original draft: Eugene Jeong.

Writing – review & editing: Young-Sil An.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer, AUC = area under the ROC curve, DTC = differentiated thyroid cancer, IQR = interquartile range, rhTSH = recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone, RIT = radioiodine therapy, ROC = receiver-operating characteristic, SD = standard deviation, Tg = thyroglobulin, TgAb = antithyroglobulin antibody.

How to cite this article: Jeong E, Yoon JK, Lee SJ, Soh EY, Lee J, Kim HK, An YS. Can the basal serum thyroglobulin level be used to predict the recombinant human TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin level in differentiated patients with thyroid cancer?. Medicine. 2019;98:51(e18437).

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Schlumberger MJ, Torlantano M. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;14:601–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Mazzaferri EL, Jhiang SM. Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med 1994;97:418–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines taskforce on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009;19:1167–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Dow KH, Ferrell BR, Anello C. Quality-of-life changes in patients with thyroid cancer after withdrawal of thyroid hormone therapy. Thyroid 1997;7:613–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Luster M, Felbinger R, Dietlein M, et al. Thyroid hormone withdrawal in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a one hundred thirty-patient pilot survey on consequences of hypothyroidism and a pharmacoeconomic comparison to recombinant thyrotropin administration. Thyroid 2005;15:1147–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Mallick U, Harmer C, Yap B, et al. Ablation with low-dose radioiodine and thyrotropin alfa in thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1674–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Schlumberger M, Catargi B, Borget I, et al. Strategies of radioiodine ablation in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1663–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Pacini F, Ladenson PW, Schlumberger M, et al. Radioiodine ablation of thyroid remnants after preparation with recombinant human thyrotropin in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: results of an international, randomized, controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:926–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Hanscheid H, Lassmann M, Luster M, et al. Iodine biokinetics and dosimetry in radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer: procedures and results of a prospective international controlled study of ablation after rhTSH or hormone withdrawal. J Nucl Med 2006;47:648–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Vaiano A, Claudio Traino A, Boni G, et al. Comparison between remnant and red-marrow absorbed dose in thyroid cancer patients submitted to 131I ablative therapy after rh-TSH stimulation versus hypothyroidism induced by L-thyroxine withdrawal. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:215–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Taieb D, Sebag F, Farman-Ara B, et al. Iodine biokinetics and radioiodine exposure after recombinant human thyrotropin-assisted remnant ablation in comparison with thyroid hormone withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:3283–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Remy H, Borget I, Leboulleux S, et al. 131I effective half-life and dosimetry in thyroid cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1445–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Van den Bruel A, Vauterin T, Poorten VV, et al. Advances in the medical management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and their impact on the surgical approach. Acta Chir Belg 2007;107:271–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].2018;Sunny S, Hephzibah J, Mathew D, et al. Stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels versus unstimulated serum thyroglobulin in the follow-up of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. 17:41–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Lee CH, Jung JH, Son SH, et al. Risk factors for radioactive iodine-avid metastatic lymph nodes on post I-131 ablation SPECT/CT in low- or intermediate-risk groups of papillary thyroid cancer. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Trimboli P, Zilioli V, Imperiali M, et al. High-sensitive basal serum thyroglobulin 6-12 months after thyroid ablation is strongly associated with early response to therapy and event-free survival in patients with low-to-intermediate risk differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2017;176:497–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Tuttle RM, Haugen B, Perrier ND. Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/tumor-node-metastasis staging system for differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancer (eighth edition): what changed and why? Thyroid 2017;27:751–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Weir I. Spearman's correlation. Statstutor, Mathematics Education Centre Loughborough University Available at: http://www statstutor ac uk/resources/uploaded/spearmans pdf Accessed 17 Jul 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Mazzaferri EL. Empirically treating high serum thyroglobulin levels. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1079–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Silberstein EB. The problem of the patient with thyroglobulin elevation but negative iodine scintigraphy: the TENIS syndrome. Semin Nucl Med 2011;41:113–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Spencer C, Fatemi S, Singer P, et al. Serum Basal thyroglobulin measured by a second-generation assay correlates with the recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated thyroglobulin response in patients treated for differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2010;20:587–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Mazzaferri EL, Robbins RJ, Spencer CA, et al. A consensus report of the role of serum thyroglobulin as a monitoring method for low-risk patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1433–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Torlontano M, Crocetti U, D’Aloiso L, et al. Serum thyroglobulin and 131I whole body scan after recombinant human TSH stimulation in the follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol 2003;148:19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].David A, Blotta A, Rossi R, et al. Clinical value of different responses of serum thyroglobulin to recombinant human thyrotropin in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2005;15:267–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Mazzaferri EL. Empirically treating high serum thyroglobulin levels, Journal of nuclear medicine: official publication. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2005;46:1079–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Schluter B, Bohuslavizki KH, Beyer W, et al. Impact of FDG PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scan. J Nucl Med 2001;42:71–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Momesso DP, Tuttle RM. Update on differentiated thyroid cancer staging. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2014;43:401–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Ortega J, Sala C, Flor B, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the UltraCision harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: an analysis of 200 cases in a randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2004;14:9–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Rahbari R, Zhang L, Kebebew E. Thyroid cancer gender disparity. Future Oncol 2010;6:1771–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, et al. A National Cancer Data Base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985-1995 [see comments]. Cancer 1998;83:2638–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, Morris DM, et al. Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma. A population-based study of 15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program 1973-1991. Cancer 1997;79:564–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Spencer CA, Wang CC. Thyroglobulin measurement. Techniques, clinical benefits, and pitfalls. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1995;24:841–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Aras G, Gultekin SS, Kucuk NO, et al. Is thyroglobulin the stronger indicator for progressive disease than the other conventional factors in same age patient groups with differentiated thyroid cancer? Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:907–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Rosario PW, Franco Mourao G, Calsolari MR. Is stimulated thyroglobulin necessary after ablation in all patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and basal thyroglobulin detectable by a second-generation assay? Int J Endocrinol 2015;2015:796471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Sager S, Hatipoglu E, Gunes B, et al. Comparison of day 3 and day 5 thyroglobulin results after thyrogen injection in differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2018;9:177–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Lerch H, Schober O, Kuwert T, et al. Survival of differentiated thyroid carcinoma studied in 500 patients. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2067–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Indrasena BS. Use of thyroglobulin as a tumour marker. World J Biol Chem 2017;8:81–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Bandeira L, Padovani RDP, Ticly AL, et al. Thyroglobulin levels before radioactive iodine therapy and dynamic risk stratification after 1 year in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2017;61:590–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES