Here we report the genome assembly, using a hybrid approach with Illumina and Nanopore sequencing, of a pathogenic Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strain isolated from a case of canine otitis. Genome assembly confirmed the antimicrobial resistance profile (disk diffusion testing) with specific genes and mutations.
ABSTRACT
Here we report the genome assembly, using a hybrid approach with Illumina and Nanopore sequencing, of a pathogenic Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strain isolated from a case of canine otitis. Genome assembly confirmed the antimicrobial resistance profile (disk diffusion testing) with specific genes and mutations.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a coagulase-positive Staphylococcus species within the Staphylococcus intermedius group (1), which is formed by S. intermedius, S. pseudintermedius, S. delphini, and S. cornubiensis (2). This bacterium is a commensal in pets’ microbiota, typically related to dogs and primarily associated with skin, fur, and mucocutaneous sites. However, it has opportunistic behavior, causing several types of infections related mostly to the skin, such as wound infections, pyoderma, and otitis, among others. S. pseudintermedius colonizes 90% of dogs, and methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) demonstrates high prevalence worldwide, e.g., 70% in Japan, 50% in China, and 30% in Europe. The report of zoonotic infections due to MRSP highlights its One Health threat. Sequence type 71 (ST71) is the most prevalent in Europe (3–8).
Swab extension of the sample and further Diff-Quick staining revealed the presence of a few cocci in the left ear of a 6-year-old Yorkshire terrier with otitis externa. The S. pseudintermedius G3C4 strain was isolated by overnight culture at 37°C on blood agar. Different antibiotics were tested in a disk diffusion inhibitory assay, with the sensitivity range criteria shown at Table 1 for aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, beta-lactams, lincosamides, phenicols, rifamycins, fusidic acid, and co-trimoxazole.
TABLE 1.
Antibiotica | Disk diffusion testing results |
Sequencing results |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zone of inhibition (mm) | Sensitivity range (μg/ml) | Susceptibilityb | Gene(s) associated | Mutation associated | Location | |
Aminoglycosides | ||||||
GEN | 12 | <12 to >15 | R | aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2ʺ)-Ia, aph(3′)-IIIa, aad(6) | Genome | |
TOB | 17 | <17 to >19 | R | |||
AMK | 25 | <14 to >17 | S | |||
Fluoroquinolones | ||||||
CIP | 9 | <20 to >22 | R | Point mutations in gyrA (positions 12, 251, 2023, and 2140) | Genome | |
MARBO | 0 | <14 to >20 | R | |||
PRADO | 15 | <19 to >24 | R | |||
ORBI | 0 | <17 to >23 | R | |||
Tetracyclines | ||||||
TET | 10 | <18 to >23 | R | tet(K) | Plasmid | |
DOX | 14 | <20 to >25 | R | |||
MIN | 18 | <19 to >24 | R | |||
Macrolide | ||||||
ERY | 0 | <13 to >23 | R | ermB | Genome | |
Beta-lactams | ||||||
OXA | 0 | <16 to >18 | R | mecA, blaZ | Genome | |
FOX | 30 | <34 to >36 | R | |||
Lincosamide | ||||||
CLI | 0 | <14 to >21 | R | ermB | Genome | |
Phenicols | ||||||
CHL | 34 | <12 to >18 | S | |||
FFC | 30 | <12 to >18 | S | |||
Rifamycin | ||||||
RIF | 44 | <16 to >20 | S | |||
Fusidane | ||||||
FD | 40 | <23 to >25 | S | |||
SXT | 0 | <10 to >16 | R | dfrG | Genome |
GEN, gentamicin; TOB, tobramycin; AMK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; MARBO, marbofloxacin; PRADO, pradofloxacin; ORBI, orbifloxacin; TET, tetracycline; DOX, doxycycline; MIN, minocycline; ERY, erythromycin; OXA, oxacillin; FOX, cefoxitin; CLI, clindamycin; CHL, chloramphenicol; FFC, florfenicol; RIF, rifampin; FD, fusidic acid; SXT, co-trimoxazole.
R, resistant; S, sensitive.
DNA from S. pseudintermedius G3C4 was extracted using a DNA microprep kit (ZymoBIOMICS), following the manufacturer’s instructions, and DNA quality was assessed by measurements with a Qubit fluorimeter (Invitrogen). The library for Nanopore sequencing was prepared by transposase fragmentation using a rapid barcoding kit (product number RBK-SQK004; Oxford Nanopore Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final library was loaded and sequenced in a MinION FLO-MIN106 flow cell v9.4.
An Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) library was prepared by enzymatic fragmentation and double indexing using an NGSgo kit (GenDx, Utrecht, Netherlands), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The indexed libraries were pooled, denatured, and diluted to a final concentration of 4 nM. The pooled library was sequenced on the MiSeq system (Illumina) with a 300-cycle MiSeq reagent kit v2.
The fast5 files generated by Nanopore sequencing were base called and demultiplexed (sorted by barcode) using Albacore v2.3.1, yielding fastq files. A second round of demultiplexing was performed with Porechop (9) (by default), in which barcodes that agreed with Albacore were kept and the others were removed. Porechop was also used to trim barcodes and other adapters from the sequences. A total of 93,340 Nanopore reads were retrieved and used for further steps; the median read length was 2,774 bp, the N50 read length was 4,382 bp, and the median Phred read quality was 14.2. A total of 2,338,855 Illumina reads were generated by the sequencer, with a median Phred read quality of 37.8. De novo genome assembly was performed with data retrieved from Nanopore and Illumina sequencing in a hybrid approach, using Unicycler v0.4.6 (10) (parameters were as follows: R1, Illumina file; R2, Illumina file; l, Nanopore reads). Further analyses included assessment of genome completeness with CheckM v1.0.11 (11) (by default), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) using CGE DTU tools (12), and annotation with Prokka v1.13 (13) (by default); the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v4.6 was used to determine the number of coding sequences, rRNAs, and tRNAs. We used ABRicate (14) with the CARD and NCBI databases to retrieve antibiotic resistance genes.
Unicycler assembly retrieved 7 contigs. Two of the contigs corresponded to the complete genome and a plasmid, with 60× coverage and lengths of 2.72 Mb and 4.4 kb, respectively. The 5 other contigs had coverage between 1.71× and 1.83×.
The assembled genome of this S. pseudintermedius isolate (63× coverage) has a size of 2,717,621 bp, with a G+C content of 37.50% and 2,548 coding sequences, 59 tRNAs, and 19 rRNA copies. CheckM determined completeness of 99.43%. MLST (12) showed that the strain belongs to the most prevalent ST in Europe, ST71, achieving 100% coverage and identity for all of the genes tested (ack, cpn60, fdh, pta, purA, sar, and tuf).
A plasmid of 4,439 bp, pSP-G3C4, was also obtained. It has a G+C content of 30.07% and 64× coverage. In a BLAST search, we obtained a match with Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 plasmid pSE-12228-01 (NCBI accession number NC_005008).
Table 1 shows the results of disk diffusion susceptibility tests with aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, beta-lactams, clindamycin, and co-trimoxazole. Genome analyses with ABRicate revealed the presence of several genes that confer resistance to most of the aforementioned antibiotics, including blaZ and mecA for beta-lactam resistance, aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2ʺ)-Ia, aph(3′)-IIIa, and aad(6) for aminoglycoside resistance, ermB for erythromycin and clindamycin resistance, and dfrG for trimethoprim resistance. We also found sat4, which confers resistance to streptothricin. Point mutations at positions 12, 251, 2032, and 2140 in the gyrA gene (encoding a topoisomerase) explain quinolone resistance (15). The tet(K) gene, conferring resistance to tetracycline, was found in the plasmid.
A SCCmec II-III cassette characteristic of S. pseudintermedius (15) harbors the methicillin resistance gene mecA. Furthermore, aad(6), sat4, and aph(3′)-IIIa genes are located contiguously in the genome, which is an antibiotic resistance gene cluster already described for this species (16). It seems that a fourth gene could be involved in the cluster, namely, ermB, which is located near the triad of genes mentioned previously. Boerlin et al. (17) already reported that there could be a link between macrolide and aminoglycoside resistance in Staphylococcus strains of canine origin.
We confirm that a long- and short-read hybrid approach is an excellent option for sequencing and assembling de novo genomes for in-depth assembly and characterization.
Data availability.
The genome sequence of S. pseudintermedius G3C4 has been deposited in the GenBank database with accession number CP032682 and RefSeq accession number NZ_CP032682; the plasmid has been deposited under GenBank accession number MN612109. All raw sequence files can be found under BioProject accession number PRJNA493792.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The S. pseudintermedius isolate was kindly donated by LETIPharma.
This study was supported by a grant awarded by the Generalitat de Catalunya (Industrial Doctorate Program, grant 2017DI037) and by Vetgenomics.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fitzgerald JR. 2009. The Staphylococcus intermedius group of bacterial pathogens: species re-classification, pathogenesis and the emergence of meticillin resistance. Vet Dermatol 20:490–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murray AK, Lee J, Bendall R, Zhang L, Sunde M, Slettemeås JS, Gaze W, Page AJ, Vos M. 2018. Staphylococcus cornubiensis sp. nov., a member of the Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:3404–3408. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iverson SA, Brazil AM, Ferguson JM, Nelson K, Lautenbach E, Rankin SC, Morris DO, Davis MF. 2015. Anatomical patterns of colonization of pets with staphylococcal species in homes of people with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin or soft tissue infection (SSTI). Vet Microbiol 176:202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Somayaji R, Priyantha MAR, Rubin JE, Church D. 2016. Human infections due to Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, an emerging zoonosis of canine origin: report of 24 cases. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 85:471–476. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bannoehr J, Guardabassi L. 2012. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in the dog: taxonomy, diagnostics, ecology, epidemiology and pathogenicity. Vet Dermatol 23:253–266.e51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grönthal T, Moodley A, Nykäsenoja S, Junnila J, Guardabassi L, Thomson K, Rantala M. 2014. Large outbreak caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71 in a Finnish veterinary teaching hospital: from outbreak control to outbreak prevention. PLoS One 9:e110084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dmitrenko OA, Balbutskaya AA, Skvortsov VN. 2016. Ecological features, pathogenic properties, and role of Staphylococcus intermedius group representatives in animal and human infectious pathology. Mol Genet Microbiol Virol 31:117–124. doi: 10.3103/S0891416816030034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Loeffler A, Lloyd DH. 2018. What has changed in canine pyoderma? A narrative review. Vet J 235:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wick R. 2017. Porechop. https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop.
- 10.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seemann T. 2017. ABRicate. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate.
- 15.Descloux S, Rossano A, Perreten V. 2008. Characterization of new staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) and topoisomerase genes in fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Clin Microbiol 46:1818–1823. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02255-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Derbise A, Aubert S, El Solh N. 1997. Mapping the regions carrying the three contiguous antibiotic resistance genes aadE, sat4, and aphA-3 in the genomes of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1024–1032. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.5.1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Boerlin P, Burnens AP, Frey J, Kuhnert P, Nicolet J. 2001. Molecular epidemiology and genetic linkage of macrolide and aminoglycoside resistance in Staphylococcus intermedius of canine origin. Vet Microbiol 79:155–169. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00347-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequence of S. pseudintermedius G3C4 has been deposited in the GenBank database with accession number CP032682 and RefSeq accession number NZ_CP032682; the plasmid has been deposited under GenBank accession number MN612109. All raw sequence files can be found under BioProject accession number PRJNA493792.