Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Jan 2;9(1):e01420-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01420-19

Complete Genome Sequence of Serratia marcescens Podophage Pila

Loraine Melbern a, Kathryn Broussard a, Russell Moreland a, Mei Liu a, Jolene Ramsey a, Justin Leavitt a,
Editor: Simon Rouxb
PMCID: PMC6940308  PMID: 31896656

Multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens strains cause serious nosocomial infections in humans. Here, we present the annotated genome sequence of S. marcescens podophage Pila. Similar to its closest relative, Enterobacteria phage T7, Pila has a 38,678-bp genome, predicted to encode 51 protein-coding genes, and contains 148-bp direct terminal repeats.

ABSTRACT

Multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens strains cause serious nosocomial infections in humans. Here, we present the annotated genome sequence of S. marcescens podophage Pila. Similar to its closest relative, Enterobacteria phage T7, Pila has a 38,678-bp genome, predicted to encode 51 protein-coding genes, and contains 148-bp direct terminal repeats.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Serratia marcescens, a facultative, Gram-negative bacterium of the family Enterobacteriaceae, causes nosocomial infections in severely immunocompromised or critically ill patients (1, 2). S. marcescens is commonly found in water, soil, animals, insects, and plants, and multidrug-resistant strains have emerged (3). Here, we present the isolation and genome annotation of S. marcescens phage Pila.

Bacteriophage Pila was propagated on host Serratia marcescens strain D1 (no. 8887172; Ward’s Science) aerobically at 30°C and 37°C in LB broth and agar (BD). This phage was plaque purified, via the soft-agar overlay method (4), from filtered (0.2-μm filter) municipal wastewater collected in College Station, Texas. Phage genomic DNA was prepared as described by Summer (5), using a modified Promega Wizard DNA clean-up system shotgun library preparation protocol. The phage DNA library was prepared with an Illumina TruSeq Nano low-throughput kit and then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq system with paired-end 250-bp reads, using a 500-cycle v2 kit. FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) was used for quality control of the 4,413 total reads in the phage-containing index, and reads were trimmed with the FastX Toolkit v0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit). SPAdes v3.5.0 was used with default parameters to assemble a single contig at 14.9-fold coverage (6). The contig was confirmed to be accurate at the termini by Sanger sequencing of PCR products amplified from the contig ends (forward, 5′-AAGGCTGTAAGTGACGCTATTG-3′; reverse, 5′-TAGCCTCAGGTGAAGCTGTA-3′). Protein-coding genes were predicted using GLIMMER v3.0 and MetaGeneAnnotator v1.0 (7, 8). Potential tRNA genes were assessed with ARAGORN v2.36 (9). Rho-independent termination sites were annotated using TransTermHP v2.09 (10). Gene function was predicted using InterProScan v5.33-72, TMHMM v2.0, and BLAST v2.2.31 searching the NCBI nonredundant and UniProtKB Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL databases, with a maximum expectation value of 0.001 (1114). Genome-wide DNA sequence similarity was calculated using progressiveMauve v2.4.0 (15). All analyses were conducted using the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) Galaxy and Web Apollo instances (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub), using default parameters unless otherwise stated (16, 17). Phage morphology was determined using negative staining with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate and transmission electron microscopy performed at the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center (18).

The 38,678-bp double-stranded DNA genome of podophage Pila has a G+C content of 48.8%. The 51 predicted protein-coding genes correspond to a coding density of 92.5%. Notably, Pila shares 83.7% nucleotide identity with Enterobacteria phage T7 (GenBank accession no. AY264774). PhageTerm analysis predicted the genomic termini to be 148-bp direct terminal repeats, typical for T7-like phages (19), which is where the Pila genome was reopened. More than 40 Pila proteins have significant similarity to those of two Yersinia phages, YpP-R and YpsP-G (GenBank accession no. JQ965701 and JQ965703, respectively).

Data availability.

The genome sequence and associated data for phage Pila were deposited under GenBank accession no. MN098329, BioProject accession no. PRJNA222858, SRA accession no. SRR8892142, and BioSample accession no. SAMN11408657.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (grant DBI-1565146). Additional support came from the CPT, an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Texas A&M University Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff.

This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Bacteriophage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hejazi A, Falkiner FR. 1997. Serratia marcescens. J Med Microbiol 46:903–912. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-11-903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cristina ML, Sartini M, Spagnolo AM. 2019. Serratia marcescens infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mahlen SD. 2011. Serratia infections: from military experiments to current practice. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:755–791. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00017-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adams M. 1959. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Summer EJ. 2009. Preparation of a phage DNA fragment library for whole genome shotgun sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 502:27–46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kingsford C, Ayanbule K, Salzberg S. 2007. Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol 8:R22. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.UniProt Consortium. 2019. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Gruning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee E, Helt GA, Reese JT, Munoz-Torres MC, Childers CP, Buels RM, Stein L, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2013. Web Apollo: a Web-based genomic annotation editing platform. Genome Biol 14:R93. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Valentine RC, Shapiro BM, Stadtman ER. 1968. Regulation of glutamine synthetase. XII. Electron microscopy of the enzyme from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 7:2143–2152. doi: 10.1021/bi00846a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier LC, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence and associated data for phage Pila were deposited under GenBank accession no. MN098329, BioProject accession no. PRJNA222858, SRA accession no. SRR8892142, and BioSample accession no. SAMN11408657.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES