Abstract
The applications of peptides and antibodies to multiple targets have emerged as powerful tools in research, diagnostics, vaccine development, and therapeutics. Antibodies are unique since they, in theory, can be directed to any desired target, which illustrates their versatile nature and broad spectrum of use as illustrated by numerous applications of peptide antibodies. In recent years, due to the inherent limitations such as size and physical properties of antibodies, it has been attempted to generate new molecular compounds with equally high specificity and affinity, albeit with relatively low success. Based on this, peptides, antibodies, and peptide antibodies have established their importance and remain crucial reagents in molecular biology.
Keywords: antibodies, aptamers, peptides, peptide antibodies, recognition molecules, synthetic libraries
1. Introduction
Peptides and antibodies (Abs) have entered a fruitful companionship in immunology since they were discovered. Peptide chemistry formed the basis of understanding protein composition and structure and Abs lay the foundation for molecular immunology, even though the relationship between Abs and antigens (Ags) had to await advances in peptide and protein chemistry. These advances led to the realization that Abs and a major group of Ags are themselves proteins [1,2]. Peptides were also crucial reagents for elucidating the molecular biology of Ab specificity and biosynthesis, both with regard to B cell specificity and development and with regard to antigen presentation and T cell specificity and development [1,2].
Today, molecular biology still depends on the use of peptides, Abs, and peptide Abs. This applies to research and diagnostics but also to therapy and may become relevant to prevention of disease (vaccination). In addition, new molecule types are being developed to complement the use of the traditional reagents and these may become more useful if the technologies can be improved.
2. Peptides
2.1. Peptide Discovery
The history of peptide chemistry dates back to around 1900, where Emil Fischer synthesized small peptides containing glycine residues [3]. The field slowly developed by introducing protecting groups for the Nα-amino group [4] and side-chain functional groups [5] as well as more effective coupling reagents for peptide bond formation [6]. In 1953, Du Vigneaud and co-workers synthesized the first biologically active peptide, oxytocin, a uterus-contracting hormone containing nine amino acids and a disulfide bond [7], as shown in Figure 1 together with other examples of bioactive peptides. Further advances in the field included Edman degradation and amino acid analysis with the former being a method for sequencing a peptide one N-terminal residue at a time [8]. Protein sequencers with Edman degradation became available in the late 1960s [9], and ninhydrin-based amino acid analysis was introduced by Moore and Stein who elucidated the structure of ribonuclease A in 1973 [10].
In 1963, Robert Bruce Merrifield introduced the solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) principle, in which a growing peptide chain is linked through the C-terminal end to a solid-support [11]. Previously, peptides were synthesized in solution and purified after each coupling step. In SPPS, the peptide chain is elongated toward the N-terminus in a step-wise manner using a protecting group for the Nα-amino group and semi-permanent groups for side chains [11]. Following synthesis, the peptide is cleaved from the solid-support with acid.
From here on, the maturation of the field was mainly driven by the introduction of analytical and preparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography [12] and mass spectrometry (MS) techniques such as matrix-assisted linear desorption-ionisation Time-Of-Flight, MALDI TOF MS [13], and liquid chromatography, LC-MS [14], which made it possible for most laboratories to purify and characterize their peptide products.
2.2. Peptide Synthesis
The most widely used method for chemical synthesis of peptides is 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) SPPS [15]. In this method, the Nα protecting group is Fmoc and acid-labile tert-butyl-based groups are used for side chain protection. Formation of the peptide bond is facilitated by an auxiliary nucleophile such as 1-Hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole, HOAt, and an in situ coupling reagent such as O-(7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate, HATU. This technology has been refined, so that today it is possible to synthesize almost any peptide of interest [16]. Larger proteins, up to 350 amino acids, may be synthesized by native chemical ligation, introduced by Kent and coworkers in 1994 [17] and reviewed recently [18]. Native Chemical ligation is also useful for introducing non-proteinogenic amino acids and labelling of proteins. However, proteins are most efficiently made by recombinant technology.
2.3. Properties
The biological activity of a peptide is coupled to its conformation, i.e., the essential functional groups must be in a required spatial orientation [19]. Peptides can adopt different secondary structures such as α-helix, β-sheet, hairpin, and random coil (Table 1), which are stabilized by hydrogen bonding, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, disulfide bonds, and/or cyclization.
Table 1.
Name | Sequence | Biological Activity | Secondary Structure | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calcitonin- Gene Related Peptide | ACDTATCVTHRLAGLLSRSGGVVKNNFVPTNVGSKAF | Vasodilator, Migrane | α-helix | [20] |
Gramicidin S | cyclo[D-Phe-Pro-Val-Orn-Leu]2 | Antimicrobial | Antiparallel β-sheet, cyclic | [21] |
Peptide 2 | KHQCHWECT-Cit-GRCRLVCGRSGS | Reacts with rheumatoid autoantibodies | β-hairpin, disulfide bonds (C4–C17, C8–C13) | [22] |
DX600 | GDYSHCSPLRYYPWWKCTYPDPEGGG | Inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 | Random coil, disulfide bond (C6–C17) | [23] |
Unusual amino acids: Orn: Ornithine. Cit: Citrulline.
α-helical or β-structures may form amphipathic structures in which the polar side chains are segregated on one face of the structure and hydrophobic side chains are on the other [24]. Amphipathic structures are important to the biological activity of smaller peptides, which was first realized by Kaiser [25]. The structure of peptides is typically studied by circular dichroism spectroscopy [26], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [27], electron microscopy [28], or X-ray crystallography [29].
2.4. Applications
Synthetic peptides have numerous applications in research, diagnostics, and treatment [30,31], epitope characterization [31,32,33,34], production of peptide Abs [35], and vaccine development [36] (Table 1). Synthetic peptides are important therapeutics, and, in the last two decades, a significant renaissance in peptide drug discovery has occurred [37,38]. Since 2000, 28 new peptide drugs have been approved for a wide range of conditions, cancer, infections, metabolic diseases, haematology, cardiovascular diseases, and osteoporosis [39].
One example of the use of synthetic peptides in diagnostics is the detection of Dengue virus Abs, as described by Bergamaschi et al. in this special issue [40] (Table 2). They successfully used a peptide representing a predicted immune-dominant (linear) epitope in Dengue Virus Envelope protein to detect Abs in infected individuals. Another particularly illustrative example of the use of peptides in diagnostics is the highly sensitive and specific detection of anti-citrullinated protein Abs, associated with rheumatoid arthritis, using synthetic peptides containing citrulline, which in vivo arises by post-translational modification (PTM) of Arg [31]. This also illustrates that peptides continue to be important reference compounds, especially with regard to PTMs. This requires further developments of synthetic strategies.
Table 2.
Area | Examples | References |
---|---|---|
Research | ||
Protease substrates | γ-secretase TM peptide substrates/AD | [41] |
Protease inhibitors | HIV-protease inhibitors/HIV subtype C | [42] |
Cell adhesion | N-methylated TSP-1 peptides/CLL | [43] |
Peptide antibody production | P110/ mycoplasma genitalium, b-raf/ malignant melanoma | [44,45] |
Epitope identification | GAD/ diabetes, CENPF/ cancer, NMDAR/ encephalitis | [34,46,47] |
Diagnostics | ||
Antibody detection | ACPA/RA, Gliadin/CD, DVEP/Dengue fever | [31,40,48,49,50] |
Peptide quantification | Insulin/diabetes, C peptide/diabetes | [51] |
Therapeutics | ||
Peptide drugs | Leuprolide/cancer, desmopressin/diabetes | [52,53] |
Vaccine development | Cell-penetrating peptides/DNA vaccine delivery | [54] |
ACPA: anti-citrullinated protein antibody. AD: Alzheimer disease. CD: celiac disease. CENPF: centromere protein F. CLL: chronic lymphocytic leukemia. DVEP: Dengue virus envelope protein. GAD: Glutamate decarboxylase. NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. HIV: human immunodeficiency virus. RA: rheumatoid arthritis. TM: transmembrane. TSP-1: thrombospondin-1.
3. Antibodies
3.1. Discovery
Abs, which are also referred to as immunoglobulins (Igs), are an indispensable part of the human immune system and occur in different forms, denoted IgM, IgD, IgG, IgA, and IgE (Figure 2) [1,2]. They were discovered during the late 19th and early 20th century as substances that react with Ags, but it was only later that it was realised that they are proteins [1,2,55]. More specifically, Abs are large symmetric heterotetrameric glycoproteins composed of two identical heavy chains and two identical light chains (Figure 2).
The covalent structure of Abs was gradually elucidated by Edman degradation during the first part of the 20th century [56] and the three-dimensional structure of Abs was characterised by crystallography in the second part of the century [57,58,59]. Traditionally, the structure of Abs has been illustrated by models as Y-shaped molecules (as shown in Figure 2). X-ray structures of Abs have mainly been limited to isolated Fab and Fc parts, even though a few structures of whole Abs have been published [60,61]. However, recent results using ion exchange-purified IgGs and chemical cross-linking in combination with MS have shown that native IgGs have a compact (“closed”) structure [62].
Abs interact with Ags through their antigen-binding sites located at the tip of the Fab “arms.” This interaction is mediated by a multitude of co-operative specific interactions, which makes antibodies highly conformation-specific. Due to the structure of the antigen-binding sites and the ability of Ab-producing cells (B cells) to undergo affinity maturation, the potential for antigen interaction is essentially unlimited [1,2]. For this reason, antibodies have become essential tools in molecular biology, diagnostics, and therapy (Table 3), which is a development catalysed by advances in Ab production and characterisation technologies.
Table 3.
Antibodies | Examples/Uses | Antibody Type | References |
---|---|---|---|
Research | Target Recognition | ||
CD14, CD20, CD34/ELISA, ICC, WB, FC | Peptide Ab (MAb) | [63,64,65] | |
Diagnostics | Target Quantification | ||
Isocitrate dehydrogenase, B-Raf, Epidermal growth factor receptor/IHC | Peptide Ab (MAb) | [66,67,68] | |
melanoma Glycoprotein B, Herpes simplex encephalitis/IHC, ELISA | Peptide Ab (MAb) | ||
Therapeutics | Target Neutralization | ||
Rhesus-D Ig/rhesus syndrome prophylaxis | PAb (Sp IVIG) | [69] | |
Anti-toxins/botulism | PAb (Sp IVIG) | [70,71] | |
Rituximab/lymphoma, Ocrelizumab/multiple sclerosis | MAb (recombinant), chimeric | [72,73] | |
Infliximab/rheumatoid arthritis | MAb (recombinant), chimeric | [74] | |
Nivolumab/malignant melanoma | MAb (recombinant), human | [75] | |
Panitumumab/EGFR metastatic colorectal carcinoma | MAb (recombinant), human | [76] | |
Daclizumab/allograft rejection | Mab (recombinant), humanized | [77] | |
HpHbR Ab-PBD conjugate/African trypanosomiasis treatment (mouse model) | MAb-drug conjugate | [78] | |
Vaccines | |||
MMR live attenuated viruses vaccine/measles, mumps, rubella prophylaxis | PAb in vivo | [79] | |
DiTePePolHiB SU vaccine/diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-hemophilus prophylaxis | PAb in vivo | [80,81,82] | |
HPV SU vaccine/cervix cancer prophylaxis | PAb in vivo | [83,84] |
CD: cluster of differentiation. DiTePePolHiB SU: Diphteria-Tetanus-Pertussis-Polio-Hemophilus influenzae B subunit vaccine. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor. ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. FC: flow cytometry. HpHbR: haptoglobin-hemoglobin receptor. IVIG: Intravenous immunoglobulin. HPV: human papilloma virus. ICC: immunohistochemistry. IHC: immunohistochemistry. MAb: monoclonal antibody. MMR: Measles-mumps-rubella. PAb: polyclonal antibody. PBD: pyrrolobenzodiazepine. Sp: Specific. SU: subunit. WB: Western blotting.
3.2. Polyclonal Antibodies
Polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) are derived from human or animal sera, which may be used in crude form or after purification (ammonium sulfate precipitation, ion exchange chromatography, protein A/G affinity chromatography, ligand affinity chromatography, etc.) [85,86]. As such, PAbs either represent naturally occurring Abs or Abs induced upon immunization. Basically, PAbs are produced by injecting an immunogen into an animal along with an adjuvant [87]. Adjuvants are used in the immunization to enhance the immune response [88,89]. Several studies have been conducted to identify the most efficient adjuvant. Aluminumhydroxide, Al(OH)3, is often favoured since it has relatively few side effects and effectively activates the innate immune system, especially the alternative complement pathway, which leads to opsonisation and activation of the adaptive immune system and, ultimately, to production of Abs with high titres [88,89]. The most common host animal for production of PAbs is the New Zealand white rabbit, but larger animals (e.g., goat, sheep, and horse) are often used for large scale production [87]. Subcutaneous injections are preferred, since they are effective and least harmful to the animal. After being injected with a specific immunogen, the animal is usually given further immunizations (boosting) to ensure Abs of high titers against the specific target [87]. After immunization and boosting, PAbs are obtained, while recognizing different epitopes of an antigen. Upon prolonged immunization, specific clones may become dominant, which increases the specificity of the Abs, and immuno-affinity purification may be used to obtain monospecific PAbs [90]. In the case of a natural infection, the spectrum of PAbs can be characterised by proteomic methods, e.g., after isolation of IgG, as illustrated by Lundström et al. in this special issue (SpotLight proteomics) [91] and used for production of recombinant Abs. Table 3 illustrates therapeutic PAb products obtained from human sera or by immunization of animals. Prominent examples are Rhesus-D PAbs (RhD Ig) used for rhesus syndrome prophylaxis and anti-botulinum toxin PAbs used for treating intoxications [69,70,71].
3.3. Monoclonal Antibodies
PAbs may exhibit unwanted reactions, including cross-reactivity, and, for many purposes, more well-defined Abs are desirable. Furthermore, PAbs may be challenging to reproduce, as they have a higher batch-to-batch variation and, therefore, require thorough characterization before use. Köhler and Milstein pioneered the technique for producing monoclonal Abs (MAbs) of desired specificities [92,93]. The initial steps for generation of PAbs and MAbs are similar [86,87,94]. The immunogen is injected into the host along with an adjuvant, which is followed by repetitive immunizations to boost the immune response of the immunized animal. As described above, the Abs generated are polyclonal, and, if aiming for MAbs, isolated B cells from the immunized animal are fused with myeloma cells. Single clones producing a sufficient amount of Abs are identified by screening and expansion [94]. The main advantage of isolating clones is that MAbs may be produced in unlimited quantities. This technique is still the major method for MAb production, as described by Köhler and Milstein, even though minor modifications may be introduced, mainly in the screening phase, where an assay system identical to the end stage use should be used to avoid selection of clones with aberrant properties [94]. Upon successful screening and cloning, highly specific MAbs are obtained and the epitopes of these can be characterised with high precision, as illustrated by recent studies of MAbs to the glutamate decarboxylase isoforms 65 and 67, which were shown to recognise linear epitopes located in flexible structures [47,95]. Similar results have been obtained with many other MAbs, which verifies the stringent requirements for an optimal antibody-antigen interaction [33,46,96,97]. MAbs may be used as crude culture supernatants (which usually contain bovine Ig) or after purification, e.g., on protein A/G [94,98] or synthetic resins, as illustrated by Islam et al. in this issue [90]. However, it is important to remember, that such purification methods may not remove the bovine IgG, which originates from the cell culture medium [99,100]. This is an issue that is mostly ignored or over-looked. Murine MAbs have had a few therapeutic uses (e.g., Muromonab anti-CD3 [101]), but due to high immunogenicity have lately been replaced by humanised or fully human recombinant MAbs.
MAbs may be produced in forms of humanized or chimeric antibodies. A chimeric antibody is an antibody made by fusing the antigen binding region from one species with the constant domain from another species [102,103], whereas humanized antibodies are generated by replacing the hypervariable loops of a fully human antibody with the hypervariable loops of a murine antibody [103,104]. Chimeric antibodies are 70% human and contain a complete human Fc portion, which makes them considerably less immunogenic in humans. Humanized antibodies are 85% to 90% human and are even less immunogenic than chimeric antibodies. However, generation of humanized antibodies is technically demanding when compared to the generation of murine antibodies. Most of the approved mAbs for therapeutic use are either chimeric or humanized (Table 3).
3.4. Recombinant Antibodies
Advances in molecular biology techniques, including sequencing, oligonucleotide synthesis, proteomics (incl. antibody proteomics), etc., have made it possible to produce recombinant Abs with pre-determined properties [105,106,107]. However, even today, most recombinant Abs represent variants of traditional MAbs, since ab initio isolation of Abs from “naïve” libraries usually yields MAbs with rather low affinities. Instead, designed libraries are usually produced and screened for Abs with desired properties. Examples of recombinant Abs are numerous, including therapeutic Abs and various immunoassays [108,109,110,111]. Table 3 shows examples of therapeutic Abs for treating human diseases. Therapeutic Abs have had enormous success, exemplified by Rituximab (an anti-CD20 MAb), which is the first therapeutic MAb for treating lymphoma and used for treatment of several autoimmune diseases [112]. Other notable examples are recombinant MAbs to tumour necrosis factor, TNF, and programmed death-1, PD-1, used for treating rheumatoid arthritis and malignant melanoma, respectively [74,75]. Recombinant Abs may be produced in various systems, including mammalian cell lines, yeasts, and phage display [90,113]. For phage display, engineered single chain fragment variable (scFv) antibodies are a preferred format due to the reduced size, which makes expression and production easier. Affinity maturation of such scFvs is feasible by various methods, as described by Lim et al. in this issue, but may require substantial work before Abs with the desired properties are obtained [114].
3.5. Engineered and Designed Antibodies
The advances in recombinant antibody technology described above have also made it possible to engineer Abs for specific purpose, including Abs with increased stability, Abs without effector functions or with reduced/increased effector functions (Fabs, scFvs, Ab-drug conjugates, etc.), Abs with several specificities (bispecific, tri-specific, etc.) [110,115,116,117]. Abs have also been used to convey particular specificities to effector T cells with good effects in the form of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) [118]. Alternative “antibody-like” binders based on protein scaffolds have been developed in the form of designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins), anticalins, affibodies, knottins, and others [119,120,121,122,123]. These binders rely on the same principles as antibodies for target recognition and may be further developed, and become more important in the future, since their affinities and specificities may approach those of antibodies and since they may have properties complementing those of antibodies.
A separate class of (designed) Abs with predetermined specificity are peptide Abs, which may be either polyclonal or monoclonal.
4. Peptide Antibodies
4.1. Discovery and Properties
Peptide Abs were originally described in the 1980s, where peptides coupled to a carrier protein were used for generating peptide-specific Abs [124]. This approach was used in the following decades, primarily to increase the general understanding of antigenicity and immunogenicity [125,126].
What basically separates traditional Abs from peptide Abs is the immunogen used for immunization. Thus, peptide Abs are strong competitors to traditional Abs, since these Abs, in theory, can be directed to any peptide, even with small molecular differences [127]. Typical peptide antibodies are directed to PTMs, conserved regions, intra-cellular or extra-cellular domains, cleavage sites, tags, and specific conformations, which can be rather challenging to control when using proteins for immunization [128]. Furthermore, peptide Abs may recognize native as well as denatured proteins with high specificity, and may even be directed to toxic or hazardous proteins, which are difficult to purify and to use in traditional antibody production [129]. Peptide Abs are usually of high specificity and affinity, and have the advantage that the antigenic target is already well-defined [94,128,129]. Based on this knowledge, peptide Abs have become a powerful tool, not only for immunological research approaches but in clinical diagnostics as well [66,67,128,130,131].
4.2. Production
Traditional peptide antibody production is based on immunization, where a crucial element is the peptide selection. Peptides used for immunization are usually 10–20 amino acids long, and peptides below 10 amino acids and above 20 amino acids are usually not preferred, since these peptides may elicit Abs that do not recognize the protein with sufficient affinity or specificity [46,130,132,133,134]. Algorithms are available for peptide selection even though these are based on peptide antigenicity rather than immunogenicity [128]. Peptides originating from protruding regions, exposed termini and flexible regions such as turns, loops, and connecting regions that are often favoured in the same manner, and regions with Pro and Gly may be favoured, since they are often represented in these structures [33,128,129,135,136,137]. A Cys residue in the N- or C-terminus of the peptide is optimal for conjugation of the peptide to a carrier [134]. However, two Cys residues or more should be avoided due to the potential of disulfide bond formation, unless deliberately used for specific conformational reasons (Table 4).
Table 4.
Selecting Factors | Examples | References |
---|---|---|
Amino acid composition | Hydrophilic aas, charged aas, Pro, Gly (represented in loops) | [33,138] |
Peptide length | 8–25 aa | [46,130,132,133,134] |
Peptide structure | Linear, flexible, cyclic, loops, turns, helices | [25,86,87,93,94,95] |
Protein target | Accessible epitope, areas of high conservation, areas of hypervariability, N/C-termini, post-translational modifications | [128,129,138] |
Following peptide synthesis, the peptides are conjugated to carriers to ensure immune responses with high antibody titres, since many peptides are not immunogenic by themselves. Traditional carriers include bovine serum albumin, keyhole limpet hemocyanin, and ovalbumin [45,128,139,140,141]. The selected peptide and the carrier are conjugated using bifunctional reagents such as glutaraldehyde, carbodiimide, N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate, or 3-maleimidobenzoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, which have been described elsewhere [35]. Upon immunization, the peptide-carrier conjugates are mixed with the adjuvant and injected into the selected animal, which is most often a mouse or rabbit. Following repetitive boosts, it may be necessary to screen for the selected target [87,94]. Although peptides of 15–20 amino acids are often applied, an epitope is usually 5–8 amino acids long. Therefore, a peptide of 15–20 amino acids may, in theory, give rise to an antibody response recognizing more than one epitope [87,94]. As a consequence, it may be necessary to characterize the different MAbs to ensure a specific reactivity, e.g., to a central modified amino acid. Otherwise, the Abs obtained may be used in the crude form [87,94]. This may be circumvented by using shorter peptides, even though this may result in lower Ab titers and reduced immunogenicity. If the peptide contains a terminal Cys residue, the peptide is easily immobilized and used in affinity chromatography to purify the Abs. To avoid selecting for peptide Abs that do not recognize the final target in the intended assay, antibody screening should be conducted in the assay that the Abs are to be used in [94,128,129,137,142].
4.3. Applications
Currently, peptide Abs are used in a variety of immunoassays such as immunoprecipitation (IP), sandwich assays, immunoblotting, immunocytochemistry, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Applications range from powerful research tools to specific diagnostic markers [128].
Peptide Abs are used in the diagnostic field in a variety of assays to aid the diagnosis of infection and diseases, for precise quantification or to identify or locate the presence of a given substance [128]. In enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)s, peptide Abs are usually used as detecting antibody in indirect ELISA or as a capture antibody in sandwich ELISA. Furthermore, peptide Abs are often used for microscopic examination of tissues by IHC, where binding of the antibody to the final target is visualized by enzymatic methods or by fluorescence.
Peptide Abs to cell surface markers are often used at fluorescent conjugates in fluorescence microscopy for IHC or flow cytometry (FC) for cells in suspension [63,64,65,143].
Detection of native targets using peptide Abs is primarily conducted using FC, where Abs are used to count and separate cells, and by IP. Furthermore, the use of peptide Abs to denatured targets often applies to localization, quantification, and detection of targets in IHC, ELISA, and Western blotting [128].
Peptide Abs have been employed in IHC for detecting specific mutations with great success. These mutation-specific peptide Abs are used in the diagnostics of various cancers to determine the presence of single point mutations or deletions in B-Raf or isocitrate dehydrogenase, associated with metastatic melanoma and the epidermal growth factor receptor, which is associated with melanoma, glioma, and lung adenocarcinoma, respectively [44,66,68]. Besides being used in the detection of various cancer types, peptide Abs have, among others, been used for diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases, infectious diseases, disorders of the immune system, cardiovascular diseases, and other conditions [128]. Moreover, peptide Abs and peptides are used to detect viruses, bacteria, and parasites and Abs to these [128].
Peptide Abs are used for numerous research purposes as well. For example, peptide Abs are often used for detecting cell surface markers, e.g., CD3, CD8, CD14, CD20, and CD34 in FC [63,64,65,143].
Despite obvious potential, peptide vaccines or peptide Abs have not yet made it into clinical therapeutic use. One of the first descriptions of peptide Abs was on hand foot and mouth (HFM) virus [124] and efforts are still ongoing to develop peptide-based vaccines targeting the many different enteroviruses capable of causing HFM disease, as described by Anasir and Poh in this issue [144].
As mentioned earlier, therapeutic MAbs have revolutionized treatment of many serious diseases. This would be expected to lead to a breakthrough for peptide vaccines, i.e., by inducing Abs to known therapeutic targets by vaccination (e.g., CD20, TNF, and PD1). However, this expectation has not been fulfilled yet. Rituximab targets an epitope on the extracellular domain of CD20, which is a prominent B cell antigen, and is an attractive target for a peptide vaccine inducing CD20 Abs. However, despite several attempts, no such vaccine has been successful as described by Favoino et al. in this issue [145]. One of the problems with this approach is that it is difficult with a synthetic peptide to mimic the three-dimensional structure of native membrane-bound CD20. Thus, even though the synthetic peptides induce Abs, they are not necessarily reactive with the target antigen, which testifies to the very high specificity of Abs. The same applies to putative mimotopes of CD20, which may be identified by phage display screening for CD20 epitopes/mimotopes, but do not elicit CD20 cross-reactive Abs upon immunization [145], which, again, demonstrates the very high specificity of (peptide) Abs.
Another potentially promising use of peptide vaccines or therapeutic peptide Abs is Alzheimer’s disease, which is believed to be caused by accumulation of toxic amyloid β aggregates in the brain [146,147]. This aggregate is composed mainly of residues 1-42 of the amyloid precursor protein, and is released by proteolytic cleavage, where it accumulates in brain plaques [146,147]. Due to the small size of amyloid β, it is an attractive candidate for a peptide vaccine or a therapeutic MAb, but efforts along this line have not led to new treatments yet.
Similar to amyloid β, α-synuclein is believed to be pathogenic in Parkinson’s disease, where it accumulates intracellularly in brain neurons [148]. In analogy with Alzheimer’s disease, immunotherapy has been proposed as a possible therapy for Parkinson’s disease. In this issue, Shen et al. describe production of MAbs to various fragments of α-synuclein and show that residues 15-65 not only self-aggregate but also promote aggregation of full length α-synuclein. Furthermore, a MAb targeting this fragment diminished aggregation of α-synuclein [149].
5. Alternative Recognition Molecules for Antigen Targeting
Despite their versatility and many excellent properties, Abs also have some inherent limitations. Due to their considerable size and specific properties, unwanted side reactions may cause problems in some applications, e.g., ELISA (non-specific binding) and IHC (low tissue penetration, non-specific binding). This can, to some extent, be relieved by the use of blocking reagents and by the use of recombinant (single chain) antibody fragments. Abs also have a potential for cross-reactions, which is a phenomenon that is not well described/understood except for a general theory of molecular similarity/mimicry [150,151,152,153,154].
Due to the limitations/problems of Ab production and applications, considerable efforts have been done to develop alternative recognition molecules and libraries. The types of recognition molecules and libraries that have been investigated include peptide libraries and libraries of AA-like monomers, dendrimers, aptamers, molecular imprints, and others (Table 5).
Table 5.
Area/Molecule Types | Examples/Uses | References |
---|---|---|
Research | Target Recognition/Identification | |
Peptide libraries | Multiple (Proteases, inhibitors, B-cell and T-cell epitopes) | [155,156] |
Carbohydrate libraries | Few | [157,158] |
Aptamers | Multiple | [159] |
Dendrimers | Few | [160,161] |
Molecular imprints | Few | [162,163] |
Diagnostics | Target Quantification | |
Aptamers | Multiple (research/development stage) | [164,165] |
Therapeutics | Target Neutralization | |
Aptamers | Pegaptanib/ocular neo-vascularization | [166] |
5.1. Peptide Libraries
Several types of peptide libraries have been developed for various screening purposes [155,156]. Combinatorial peptide libraries have been used for basic research and drug discovery, although with mixed success. Positional scanning libraries have large diversity, but often do not yield specific recognition peptides, presumably due to a large flexibility of the peptides. However, such libraries have been used to identify a range of protease substrates and protease inhibitors as well as optimal B and T cell epitopes [167,168,169,170,171]. One advantage of such libraries is that D-amino acids, non-natural amino acids, or other types of molecules, e.g., PTMs, can fairly easily be incorporated, which sometimes yields peptides with improved properties [167,172].
5.2. Dendrimers
Dendrimers are branched molecules with a predefined structure usually based on repetitive addition of monomer building blocks to a central core molecule and can be thought of as three-dimensional analogues of linear molecules. They should, in principle, be capable of yielding specific recognition molecules, depending on the diversity of the monomer building blocks [160,161]. In practise, however, dendrimers have found relatively few applications, possibly due to low affinity and steric hindrance effects.
5.3. Aptamers
Aptamers are single chain nucleotides (RNA, DNA, and XNA (xeno-nucleic acids)) with a well-defined structure due to intramolecular base pairing, and such molecules can be amplified and selected from various libraries using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technologies and affinity selection [173,174,175,176,177]. A much-used method is SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment), which amplifies aptamers from random libraries by repetitive rounds of affinity selection (panning) combined with PCR amplification. However, aptamers amplified by this method usually requires further optimization in order to become practically useful, which is also testified by the relatively low number of currently useful aptamers [170,178]. One aptamer, which has found clinical use, is Pegaptanib, which is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeting aptamer (Figure 3) used for treatment of various forms of pathological ocular neovascularization [166]. The success of this aptamer may relate to an ability to interact with the heparin-binding site of VEGF by mimicking the repetitive negative charges on heparin.
5.4. Other Recognition Molecules
Molecular imprinting is a technique where polymers are assembled on molecular templates, which are subsequently removed, which leave a “molecularly imprinted” polymer. This can, in principle, be used as antibody mimic, receptor mimic, or, in general, a molecular sensor [164,165]. Imprinted polymers can be made on the basis of a wide range of (polymerizable) monomers and can be made and further modified “post-imprinting” to have Ab-like recognition properties [162,163]. Compared to Abs, they are relatively cheap and easy to produce, but cannot yet compete with antibodies in terms of affinity and specificity. Practical applications are therefore essentially missing at present.
6. Discussion and Conclusions
Peptides are widespread in nature and have numerous biomedical applications for diagnostics, therapy, and research. With 20 amino acid building blocks and many PTMs, the diversity of peptides is extremely large, which is also testified by the number of different bioactive naturally occurring peptides. Peptides are therefore extremely important in all fields of molecular biology and medicine, not only in the form of natural or synthetic agonists and antagonists, where specificity is determined by conformational or disulfide bridge-dependent sterical constraints, but also in clinically applicable platforms based on f. ex. short cysteine-constrained recognition scaffolds, where the specific antigen or receptor recognition is enabled by the constraint. One of the most important uses of peptides is for the production of peptide Abs. Peptides have very low immunogenicity themselves but can be used for induction of Abs, when coupled to a carrier protein, which can provide T cell epitopes for induction of Abs. The conjugation also limits the conformational flexibility of the peptides, which makes them more immunogenic/antigenic. Due to their structure and composite antigen binding sites (complementarity-determining regions), Abs are very specific recognition molecules and interact with their epitopes through multiple bonds, which gives them high affinity and specificity. Moreover, they can be obtained fairly easily and go through multiple rounds of affinity maturation during immunization, which makes them highly valuable and, until now, irreplaceable reagents for diagnostics and therapy. The advantage of using peptide antibodies are that they, in theory, can be directed to any target. However, peptide antibodies may be difficult to generate with sufficiently high titers. Moreover, they do not necessarily recognize the native antigen. Similar when generating MAbs to a protein, it may be difficult to generate an antibody to a specific site, e.g., a modification or a specific domain. These obstacles when using MAbs and peptide antibodies, may be avoided by screening for reactivity to targets in the intended assay.
A notable limitation when using Abs is tissue penetration both in vitro (e.g. IHC) and in vivo. For example, MAbs directed to e.g., tumor-specific antigens often remain in the blood and only approximately 20% of the administered dose typically interacts with the tumor [179]. Moreover, MAbs can have various modes of action, and the actual mode of action once administered to patients is not always clear [119]. Another limitation when producing antibodies for therapeutic uses are the production costs. The use of a very large culture of mammalian cells and extensive purification steps limit the use of antibodies. Another naturally inherent limitation of natural and synthetic Abs for therapy is the ability of pathogens to mutate and evade antibody responses and the inherent immunogenicity of proteins, even in the form of fully human or humanized Abs. Abs also have some inherent limitations due to size and other physical properties, and, therefore, many attempts have been made at developing other molecule types with equally high affinity and specificity. Alternative protein-based scaffolds relying on Ab-derived principles for selection have been developed and are beginning to complement Abs. However, in terms of therapy, such binders can be expected to suffer from equal or even higher problems with immunogenicity as Abs. The most successful non-protein recognition molecules developed to date are the aptamers, self-folding RNA molecules, which can be selected and amplified from various libraries, but usually require further modifications in order to become useful. However, despite much research and development, very few aptamers are of commercial importance today.
In conclusion, peptides, Abs, and peptide Abs currently remain the cornerstone reagents in molecular biology, which is also illustrated by several papers in this issue. Hopefully, in the future, new and more advanced recognition molecules will be generated, which may complement Abs and have diagnostic as well as therapeutic uses.
Abbreviations
ELISA | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay |
Fmoc | 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl |
ICC | Immunocytochemistry |
IHC | Immunohistochemistry |
IP | Immunoprecipitation |
FC | Flow cytometry |
HFMV | Hand foot mouth virus |
scFv | single chain fragment variable |
SPPS | Solid-phase peptide synthesis |
PTM | Posttranslational modification |
PAb | Polyclonal antibody |
Mab | Monoclonal antibody |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.H., N.T., and P.H. Writing—original draft preparation, G.H., N.T. and P.H. Writing—review and editing, G.H., N.T. and P.H.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Murphy K., Weaver C. Janeways’s Immunobiology. 9th ed. Garland Science; New York, NY, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Owen J.A., Punt J., Stranford S.A. Kuby Immunology. Volume 8 W.H. Freeman & Co Ltd.; New York, NY, USA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fischer A. Ueber enige derivate des glykocolls. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1901;34:2868–2877. doi: 10.1002/cber.190103402249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bergmann M., Zervas L. Uber ein allgemeines verfahren der peptide-synthese. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1932;65:1192–1201. doi: 10.1002/cber.19320650722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McKay F.C., Albertson N.F. Mew amine-masking groups for peptide synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957;79:4686–4690. doi: 10.1021/ja01574a029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sheehan J.C., Hess G.P. A method of forming peptide bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955;77:1067–1068. doi: 10.1021/ja01609a099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vigneaud V.D., Ressler C., Swan C.J.M., Roberts C.W., Katsoyannis P.G., Gordon S. The synthesis of an octapeptide amide with the hormonal activity of oxytocin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953;75:4879–4880. doi: 10.1021/ja01115a553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Edman P. Method for determination of the amino acid sequence in peptides. Acta Chem. Scand. 1950;4:283–293. doi: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.04-0283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Edman P., Begg G. A protein sequenator. Eur. J. Biochem. 1967;1:80–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1967.tb00047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moore S., Stein W.H. Chemical structures of pancreatic ribonuclease and deoxyribonuclease. Science. 1973;180:458–464. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4085.458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Merrifield R.B. Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963;85:2149–2154. doi: 10.1021/ja00897a025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boysen R.I. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography of Peptides and Proteins. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kafka A.P., Kleffmann T., Rades T., McDowell A. The application of maldi tof ms in biopharmaceutical research. Int. J. Pharm. 2011;417:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Letzel T. Protein and Peptide Analysis by Lc-ms: Experimentas Strategies (Rsc Chromatography Monographs) Royal Society of Chemistry; London, UK: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hansen P.R., Oddo A. Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1348:33–50. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2999-3_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jad Y.E., El-Faham A., Beatriz G., Albericio F. Peptide-Based Drug Discovery: Challenges and New Therapeutics. The Royal Society of Chemistry; London, UK: 2017. Solid-phase peptide synthesis, the state of art: Challenges and opportunities; pp. 518–550. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dawson P.E., Muir T.W., Clark-Lewis I., Kent S.B. Synthesis of proteins by native chemical ligation. Science. 1994;266:776–779. doi: 10.1126/science.7973629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Agouridas V., El Mahdi O., Diemer V., Cargoet M., Monbaliu J.M., Melnyk O. Native chemical ligation and extended methods: Mechanisms, catalysis, scope, and limitations. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:7328–7443. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marshall G.R., Denise D.B., Gregory G.N. Peptide conformation: Stability and dynamics. In: Gutte B., editor. Peptide: Synthesis, Structures and Applications. Associated Press; New York, NY, USA: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Watkins H.A., Rathbone D.L., Barwell J., Hay D.L., Poyner D.R. Structure-activity relationships for alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013;170:1308–1322. doi: 10.1111/bph.12072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kamysz E., Mickiewicz B., Kamysz W., Bielińska S., Rodziewicz-Motowidło S., Ciarkowski J. Synthesis, biological activity and solution structure of new analogues of the antimicrobial Gramicidin S. Int. J. Pep. Sci. 2011;17:211–217. doi: 10.1002/psc.1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fischer S., Lamping M., Gold M., Rottger Y., Brodje D., Dodel R., Frantz R., Mraheil M.A., Chakraborty T., Geyer A. Synthesis of a biological active beta-hairpin peptide by addition of two structural motifs. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017;25:603–608. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Steinmetz W.E., Carrel T.N., Peprah R.B. The conformation and assignment of the proton nmr spectrum in water of dx600, a bioactive peptide with a random coil conformation. Int. J. Spectrosc. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/296256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moore M.L., Grant G.A. Synthetic Peptides. A User’s Guide. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaiser E.T. Design principles in the construction of biologically active peptides. TIBS. 1987;12:305–309. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(87)90147-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ranjbar B., Gill P. Circular dichroism techniques: Biomolecular and nanostructural analyses—A review. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009;74:101–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bernini A., Termissi P. Nuclear magnetic resonance of amino acids, peptides, and proteins. In: Hughes A.B., editor. Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins in Organic Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; Weinheim, Germany: 2010. pp. 97–153. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao X., De Maziere A., Iaea D.B., Arthur C.P., Klumperman J., Ciferri C., Hannoush R.N. Visualizing the cellular route of entry of a cystine-knot peptide with xfect transfection reagent by electron microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:6907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43285-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yang H., Wierzbicki M., Du Bois D.R., Nowick J.S. X-ray crystallographic structure of a teixobactin derivative reveals amyloid-like assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:14028–14032. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Okarvi S.M., Maecke H.R. Chapter eight—Radiometallo-labeled peptides in tumor diagnosis and targeted radionuclide therapy. In: van Eldik R., Hubbard C.D., editors. Advances in Inorganic Chemistry. Volume 68. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2016. pp. 341–396. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trier N.H., Holm B.E., Heiden J., Slot O., Locht H., Lindegaard H., Svendsen A., Nielsen C.T., Jacobsen S., Theander E., et al. Antibodies to a strain-specific citrullinated epstein-barr virus peptide diagnoses rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:3684. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22058-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Opuni K.F.M., Al-Majdoub M., Yefremova Y., El-Kased R.F., Koy C., Glocker M.O. Mass spectrometric epitope mapping. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2018;37:229–241. doi: 10.1002/mas.21516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Trier N.H., Hansen P.R., Vedeler C.A., Somnier F.E., Houen G. Identification of continuous epitopes of hud antibodies related to paraneoplastic diseases/small cell lung cancer. J. Neuroimmunol. 2012;243:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Welner S., Trier N.H., Houen G., Hansen P.R. Identification and mapping of a linear epitope of centromere protein f using monoclonal antibodies. J. Pept. Sci. 2013;19:95–101. doi: 10.1002/psc.2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trier N.H., Hansen P.R., Houen G. Production and characterization of peptide antibodies. Methods. 2012;56:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hos B.J., Tondini E., van Kasteren S.I., Ossendorp F. Approaches to improve chemically defined synthetic peptide vaccines. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:884. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Albericio F. Therapeutic peptides. Future Med. Chem. 2012;4:1527–1531. doi: 10.4155/fmc.12.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mathew N.R., Baumgartner F., Braun L., O’Sullivan D., Thomas S., Waterhouse M., Muller T.A., Hanke K., Taromi S., Apostolova P., et al. Erratum: Sorafenib promotes graft-versus-leukemia activity in mice and humans through il-15 production in flt3-itd-mutant leukemia cells. Nat. Med. 2018;24:526. doi: 10.1038/nm0418-526c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Henninot A., Collins J.C., Nuss J.M. The current state of peptide drug discovery: Back to the future? J. Med. Chem. 2017;61:1382–1414. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bergamaschi G., Fassi E.M.A., Romanato A., D’Annessa I., Odinolfi M.T., Brambilla D., Damin F., Chiari M., Gori A., Colombo G., et al. Computational analysis of dengue virus envelope protein (e) reveals an epitope with flavivirus immunodiagnostic potential in peptide microarrays. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1921. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Philip A.T., Devkota S., Malvankar S., Bhattarai S., Meneely K.M., Williams T.D., Wolfe M.S. Designed helical peptides as functional probes for gamma-secretase. Biochemistry. 2019;58:4398–4407. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maseko S., Padayachee E., Maphumulo S., Govender T., Sayed Y., Maguire G., Lin J., Naicker T., Baijnath S., Gerhardus K.H. Kinetic and thermodynamic characterisation of hiv-protease inhibitors against e35d upward arrowg upward arrows mutant in the south african hiv-1 subtype c protease. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019;34:1451–1456. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2019.1636234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pramil E., Herbi Bastian L., Denefle T., Nemati F., Xiao M., Larde E., Maloum K., Roos-Weil D., Chapiro E., Le Garff-Tavernier M., et al. Targeting chronic lymphocytic leukemia with n-methylated thrombospondin-1-derived peptides overcomes drug resistance. Blood Adv. 2019;3:2920–2933. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Routhier C.A., Mochel M.C., Lynch K., Dias-Santagata D., Louis D.N., Hoang M.P. Comparison of 2 monoclonal antibodies for immunohistochemical detection of braf v600e mutation in malignant melanoma, pulmonary carcinoma, gastrointestinal carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and gliomas. Hum. Pathol. 2013;44:2563–2570. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zarei O., Irajian G.R., Zarnani A.H., Chamani-Tabriz L., Emami S., Jeddi-Tehrani M., Rabbani H. Peptide-based polyclonal antibody production against p110 protein of mycoplasma genitalium. Avicenna J. Med. Biotechnol. 2011;3:79–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Amrutkar S.D., Trier N.H., Hansen P.R., Houen G. Fine mapping of a monoclonal antibody to the n-methyl d-aspartate receptor reveals a short linear epitope. Biopolymers. 2012;98:567–575. doi: 10.1002/bip.22165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Valdarnini N., Holm B., Hansen P., Rovero P., Houen G., Trier N. Fine mapping of glutamate decarboxylase 65 epitopes reveals dependency on hydrophobic amino acids for specific interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2909. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Trier N.H., Holm B.E., Heiden J., Slot O., Locht H., Jensen B., Lindegaard H., Svendsen A., Nielsen C.T., Jacobsen S., et al. The use of synthetic peptides for detection of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. Methods. 2018;454:6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Trier N.H., Holm B.E., Slot O., Locht H., Lindegaard H., Svendsen A., Nielsen C.T., Jacobsen S., Theander E., Houen G. Application of synthetic peptides for detection of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies. Peptides. 2016;76:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Prince H.E. Evaluation of the inova diagnostics enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for measuring serum immunoglobulin g (igg) and iga to deamidated gliadin peptides. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13:150–151. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.1.150-151.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liu T.C., Chen M.J., Ren Z.Q., Hou J.Y., Lin G.F., Wu Y.S. Development of an improved time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for simultaneous quantification of c-peptide and insulin in human serum. Clin. Biochem. 2014;47:439–444. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Manning M., Misicka A., Olma A., Bankowski K., Stoev S., Chini B., Durroux T., Mouillac B., Corbani M., Guillon G. Oxytocin and vasopressin agonists and antagonists as research tools and potential therapeutics. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24:609–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02303.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wilson A.C., Meethal S.V., Bowen R.L., Atwood C.S. Leuprolide acetate: A drug of diverse clinical applications. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2007;16:1851–1863. doi: 10.1517/13543784.16.11.1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Davoodi S., Bolhassani A., Sadat S.M., Irani S. Design and in vitro delivery of hiv-1 multi-epitope DNA and peptide constructs using novel cell-penetrating peptides. Biotechnol. Lett. 2019;41:1283–1298. doi: 10.1007/s10529-019-02734-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hey A. History and practice: Antibodies in infectious diseases. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015;3:AID-0026-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.AID-0026-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fahey J.L. Antibodies and immunoglobulins. I. Structure and function. JAMA. 1965;194:71–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03090140079020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alzari P.M., Lascombe M.B., Poljak R.J. Three-dimensional structure of antibodies. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1988;6:555–580. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.06.040188.003011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Harris L.J., Larson S.B., Hasel K.W., Day J., Greenwood A., McPherson A. The three-dimensional structure of an intact monoclonal antibody for canine lymphoma. Nature. 1992;360:369–372. doi: 10.1038/360369a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Saphire E.O., Stanfield R.L., Crispin M.D., Morris G., Zwick M.B., Pantophlet R.A., Parren P.W., Rudd P.M., Dwek R.A., Burton D.R., et al. Crystal structure of an intact human igg: Antibody asymmetry, flexibility, and a guide for hiv-1 vaccine design. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2003;535:55–66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0065-0_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Blech M., Horer S., Kuhn A.B., Kube S., Goddeke H., Kiefer H., Zang Y., Alber Y., Kast S.M., Westermann M., et al. Structure of a therapeutic full-length anti-npra igg4 antibody: Dissecting conformational diversity. Biophys. J. 2019;116:1637–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Harris L.J., Skaletsky E., McPherson A. Crystallographic structure of an intact igg1 monoclonal antibody. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;275:861–872. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maibom-Thomsen S.L., Trier N.H., Holm B.E., Hansen K.B., Rasmussen M.I., Chailyan A., Marcatili P., Hojrup P., Houen G. Immunoglobulin g structure and rheumatoid factor epitopes. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0217624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Maleki L.A., Majidi J., Baradaran B., Abdolalizadeh J., Akbari A.M. Production and characterization of murine monoclonal antibody against synthetic peptide of cd34. Hum. Antibodies. 2013;22:1–8. doi: 10.3233/HAB-130265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Maleki L.A., Shanehbandi D., Majidi J., Yusefi M., Abdolalizadeh J., Orangi M., Baradaran B. Production of anti-cd14 monoclonal antibody using synthetic peptide of human cd14 as immunizing antigen. Hum. Antibodies. 2013;22:67–71. doi: 10.3233/HAB-140272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sepehr K.S., Baradaran B., Majidi J., Abdolalizadeh J., Aghebati L., Shahneh F.Z. Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against human cd20 in balb/c mice. Hum. Antibodies. 2012;21:57–64. doi: 10.3233/HAB-130263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen Q., Xia C., Deng Y., Wang M., Luo P., Wu C., Yue J., Fang N., Wang M., Wei S. Immunohistochemistry as a quick screening method for clinical detection of braf(v600e) mutation in melanoma patients. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:5727–5733. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1759-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cooper W.A., Yu B., Yip P.Y., Ng C.C., Lum T., Farzin M., Trent R.J., Mercorella B., Clarkson A., Kohonen-Corish M.R., et al. Egfr mutant-specific immunohistochemistry has high specificity and sensitivity for detecting targeted activating egfr mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2013;66:744–748. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Loussouarn D., Le Loupp A.G., Frenel J.S., Leclair F., Von Deimling A., Aumont M., Martin S., Campone M., Denis M.G. Comparison of immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing and allele-specific pcr for the detection of idh1 mutations in gliomas. Int. J. Oncol. 2012;40:2058–2062. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Costumbrado J., Mansour T., Ghassemzadeh S. Rh incompatibility. Statpearls; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2019. [(accessed on 12 December 2019)]. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459353/ [Google Scholar]
- 70.Habermann E., Bernath S. Preparation, measurement and possible use of human antitoxin against cl. Botulinum a, b, and e toxins. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 1975;161:203–210. doi: 10.1007/BF02121011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Torgeman A., Ozeri E., Ben David A., Diamant E., Rosen O., Schwartz A., Barnea A., Makovitzki A., Mimran A., Zichel R. Role of homologous fc fragment in the potency and efficacy of anti-botulinum antibody preparations. Toxins. 2017;9:180. doi: 10.3390/toxins9060180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bigaut K., De Seze J., Collongues N. Ocrelizumab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2019;19:97–108. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1561284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Molina A. A decade of rituximab: Improving survival outcomes in non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. Annu. Rev. Med. 2008;59:237–250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.060906.220345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bondeson J., Maini R.N. Tumour necrosis factor as a therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory diseases: The clinical experience with infliximab (remicade) Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2001;55:211–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Koppolu V., Rekha Vasigala V.K. Checkpoint immunotherapy by nivolumab for treatment of metastatic melanoma. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2018;14:1167–1175. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1290_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Battaglin F., Dadduzio V., Bergamo F., Manai C., Schirripa M., Lonardi S., Zagonel V., Loupakis F. Anti-egfr monoclonal antibody panitumumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An overview of current practice and future perspectives. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2017;17:1297–1308. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1356815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saghafi H., Rahbar K., Nobakht Haghighi A., Qoreishi M., Safdari F. Efficacy of anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody (daclizumab) in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Nephrourol. Mon. 2012;4:475–477. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.MacGregor P., Gonzalez-Munoz A.L., Jobe F., Taylor M.C., Rust S., Sandercock A.M., Macleod O.J.S., Van Bocxlaer K., Francisco A.F., D’Hooge F., et al. A single dose of antibody-drug conjugate cures a stage 1 model of african trypanosomiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019;13:e0007373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bankamp B., Hickman C., Icenogle J.P., Rota P.A. Successes and challenges for preventing measles, mumps and rubella by vaccination. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2019;34:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Reynolds D.L., Vidor E. Fully liquid dtap-ipv-hib pediatric combination vaccine (pediacel): A review of 18 years of clinical experience. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2014;13:943–968. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.933674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Skibinski D.A., Baudner B.C., Singh M., O’Hagan D.T. Combination vaccines. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2011;3:63–72. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.77298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Syed Y.Y. Dtap-ipv-hepb-hib vaccine (hexyon((r))): An updated review of its use in primary and booster vaccination. Paediatr. Drugs. 2019;21:397–408. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00353-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Arbyn M., Xu L., Simoens C., Martin-Hirsch P.P. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;5:CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Roden R.B.S., Stern P.L. Opportunities and challenges for human papillomavirus vaccination in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:240–254. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2018.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nakazawa M., Mukumoto M., Miyatake K. Production and purification of polyclonal antibodies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;657:63–74. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-783-9_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Nakazawa M., Mukumoto M., Miyatake K. Production and Purification of Polyclonal Antibodies. Volume 1474. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 2016. pp. 49–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pihl T.H., Illigen K.E., Houen G. Polyclonal peptide antisera. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1348:103–107. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2999-3_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Guven E., Duus K., Laursen I., Hojrup P., Houen G. Aluminum hydroxide adjuvant differentially activates the three complement pathways with major involvement of the alternative pathway. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e74445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Trier N.H., Guven E., Skogstrand K., Ciplys E., Slibinskas R., Houen G. Comparison of immunological adjuvants. APMIS. 2019;127:635–641. doi: 10.1111/apm.12976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Islam T., Naik A.D., Hashimoto Y., Menegatti S., Carbonell R.G. Optimization of sequence, display, and mode of operation of igg-binding peptide ligands to develop robust, high-capacity affinity adsorbents that afford high igg product quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:161. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lundstrom S.L., Heyder T., Wiklundh E., Zhang B., Eklund A., Grunewald J., Zubarev R.A. Spotlight proteomics-a igg-enrichment phenotype profiling approach with clinical implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2157. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kohler G., Howe S.C., Milstein C. Fusion between immunoglobulin-secreting and nonsecreting myeloma cell lines. Eur. J. Immunol. 1976;6:292–295. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kohler G., Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. 1975. J. Immunol. 2005;174:2453–2455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Trier N.H., Mortensen A., Schiolborg A., Friis T. Production and screening of monoclonal peptide antibodies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1348:109–126. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2999-3_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Agca S., Houen G., Trier N.H. Characterization of continuous b-cell epitopes in the n-terminus of glutamate decarboxylase67 using monoclonal antibodies. J. Pept. Sci. 2014;20:928–934. doi: 10.1002/psc.2703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Dam C.E., Houen G., Hansen P.R., Trier N.H. Identification and fine mapping of a linear b cell epitope of human vimentin. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2014;74:506–514. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.908474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tronstrom J., Draborg A.H., Hansen P.R., Houen G., Trier N.H. Identification of a linear epitope recognized by a monoclonal antibody directed to the heterogeneous nucleoriboprotein a2. Protein Pept. Lett. 2014;21:25–31. doi: 10.2174/09298665113209990085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Harlow E.L.D. Antibodies—A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; New York, NY, USA: 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Copestake D.E., Indyk H.E., Otter D.E. Affinity liquid chromatography method for the quantification of immunoglobulin g in bovine colostrum powders. J. AOAC Int. 2006;89:1249–1256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gall-Debreceni A., Lazar J., Kadas J., Balogh A., Ferenczi A., Sos E., Takacs L., Kurucz I. Specific detection and quantitation of bovine igg in bioreactor derived mouse mab preparations. J. Immunol. Methods. 2016;438:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Todd P.A., Brogden R.N. Muromonab cd3. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential. Drugs. 1989;37:871–899. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198937060-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Neuberger M.S., Williams G.T., Mitchell E.B., Jouhal S.S., Flanagan J.G., Rabbitts T.H. A hapten-specific chimaeric ige antibody with human physiological effector function. Nature. 1985;314:268–270. doi: 10.1038/314268a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Chames P., Van Regenmortel M., Weiss E., Baty D. Therapeutic antibodies: Successes, limitations and hopes for the future. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;157:220–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00190.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Reichert J.M., Rosensweig C.J., Faden L.B., Dewitz M.C. Monoclonal antibody successes in the clinic. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005;23:1073–1078. doi: 10.1038/nbt0905-1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Basu K., Green E.M., Cheng Y., Craik C.S. Why recombinant antibodies—Benefits and applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019;60:153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ma H., O’Kennedy R. The structure of natural and recombinant antibodies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1348:7–11. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2999-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tomszak F., Weber S., Zantow J., Schirrmann T., Hust M., Frenzel A. Selection of recombinant human antibodies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016;917:23–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32805-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Baird C.L., Fischer C.J., Pefaur N.B., Miller K.D., Kagan J., Srivastava S., Rodland K.D. Developing recombinant antibodies for biomarker detection. Cancer Biomark. 2010;6:271–279. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2009-0144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Dubel S. Recombinant therapeutic antibodies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;74:723–729. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0810-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Koch J., Tesar M. Recombinant antibodies to arm cytotoxic lymphocytes in cancer immunotherapy. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 2017;44:337–350. doi: 10.1159/000479981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zeng X., Shen Z., Mernaugh R. Recombinant antibodies and their use in biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012;402:3027–3038. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5569-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Casan J.M.L., Wong J., Northcott M.J., Opat S. Anti-cd20 monoclonal antibodies: Reviewing a revolution. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14:2820–2841. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1508624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Dangi A.K., Sinha R., Dwivedi S., Gupta S.K., Shukla P. Cell line techniques and gene editing tools for antibody production: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:630. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lim C.C., Choong Y.S., Lim T.S. Cognizance of molecular methods for the generation of mutagenic phage display antibody libraries for affinity maturation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1861. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ahamadi-Fesharaki R., Fateh A., Vaziri F., Solgi G., Siadat S.D., Mahboudi F., Rahimi-Jamnani F. Single-chain variable fragment-based bispecific antibodies: Hitting two targets with one sophisticated arrow. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics. 2019;14:38–56. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2019.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Krishnamurthy A., Jimeno A. Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: A review. Pharm. Ther. 2018;185:122–134. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Runcie K., Budman D.R., John V., Seetharamu N. Bi-specific and tri-specific antibodies- the next big thing in solid tumor therapeutics. Mol. Med. 2018;24:50. doi: 10.1186/s10020-018-0051-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Walsh Z., Yang Y., Kohler M.E. Immunobiology of chimeric antigen receptor t cells and novel designs. Immunol. Rev. 2019;290:100–113. doi: 10.1111/imr.12794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Borrebaeck C.A., Carlsson R. Human therapeutic antibodies. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2001;1:404–408. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4892(01)00070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Nord K., Gunneriusson E., Ringdahl J., Stahl S., Uhlen M., Nygren P.A. Binding proteins selected from combinatorial libraries of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997;15:772–777. doi: 10.1038/nbt0897-772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Pluckthun A. Designed ankyrin repeat proteins (darpins): Binding proteins for research, diagnostics, and therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2015;55:489–511. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Richter A., Eggenstein E., Skerra A. Anticalins: Exploiting a non-ig scaffold with hypervariable loops for the engineering of binding proteins. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Simeon R., Chen Z. In vitro-engineered non-antibody protein therapeutics. Protein Cell. 2018;9:3–14. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0386-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Rowlands D.J., Clarke B.E., Carroll A.R., Brown F., Nicholson B.H., Bittle J.L., Houghten R.A., Lerner R.A. Chemical basis of antigenic variation in foot-and-mouth disease virus. Nature. 1983;306:694–697. doi: 10.1038/306694a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Van Regenmortel M.H. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of synthetic peptides. Biologicals. 2001;29:209–213. doi: 10.1006/biol.2001.0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Houen G. Peptide Antibodies: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Kao D.J., Hodges R.S. Advantages of a synthetic peptide immunogen over a protein immunogen in the development of an anti-pilus vaccine for pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009;74:33–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00825.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Trier N.H., Houen G. Peptide antibodies in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2017;81:43–96. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Grant G.A. Synthetic peptides for production of antibodies that recognize intact proteins. Chapter 11. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2002;59:11–16. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1116s59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Barnard G., Hopkins L., Moorthie S., Seilly D., Tonks P., Dabaghian R., Clewley J., Coward J., McConnell I. Direct detection of disease associated prions in brain and lymphoid tissue using antibodies recognizing the extreme n terminus of prpc. Prion. 2007;1:121–127. doi: 10.4161/pri.1.2.4439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Bhullar S.S., Chandak N.H., Baheti N.N., Purohit H.J., Taori G.M., Daginawala H.F., Kashyap R.S. Diagnosis of herpes simplex encephalitis by elisa using antipeptide antibodies against type-common epitopes of glycoprotein b of herpes simplex viruses. J. Immunoass. Immunochem. 2016;37:217–227. doi: 10.1080/15321819.2015.1100119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Field S., Uyttenhove C., Stroobant V., Cheou P., Donckers D., Coutelier J.P., Simpson P.T., Cummings M.C., Saunus J.M., Reid L.E., et al. Novel highly specific anti-periostin antibodies uncover the functional importance of the fascilin 1-1 domain and highlight preferential expression of periostin in aggressive breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2016;138:1959–1970. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Gutierrez J., Criado R., Citti R., Martin M., Herranz C., Fernandez M.F., Cintas L.M., Hernandez P.E. Performance and applications of polyclonal antipeptide antibodies specific for the enterococcal bacteriocin enterocin p. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:2247–2255. doi: 10.1021/jf030551j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Skovbjerg H., Koch C., Anthonsen D., Sjostrom H. Deamidation and cross-linking of gliadin peptides by transglutaminases and the relation to celiac disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1690:220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Chou P.Y., Fasman G.D. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1978;47:45–148. doi: 10.1002/9780470122921.ch2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Garnier J., Osguthorpe D.J., Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1978;120:97–120. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lee B.S., Huang J.S., Jayathilaka G.D., Lateef S.S., Gupta S. Production of antipeptide antibodies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;657:93–108. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-783-9_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Rubinstein N.D., Mayrose I., Halperin D., Yekutieli D., Gershoni J.M., Pupko T. Computational characterization of b-cell epitopes. Mol. Immunol. 2008;45:3477–3489. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Houen G., Jakobsen M.H., Svaerke C., Koch C., Barkholt V. Conjugation to preadsorbed preactivated proteins and efficient generation of anti peptide antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods. 1997;206:125–134. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(97)00097-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Houen G., Jensen O.M. Conjugation to preactivated proteins using divinylsulfone and iodoacetic acid. J. Immunol. Methods. 1995;181:187–200. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)00345-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hurdayal R., Achilonu I., Choveaux D., Coetzer T.H., Dean Goldring J.P. Anti-peptide antibodies differentiate between plasmodial lactate dehydrogenases. Peptides. 2010;31:525–532. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Hancock D.C., O’Reilly N.J. Synthetic peptides as antigens for antibody production. Methods Mol. Biol. 2005;295:13–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Berghoff A.S., Lassmann H., Preusser M., Hoftberger R. Characterization of the inflammatory response to solid cancer metastases in the human brain. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2013;30:69–81. doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9510-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Anasir M.I., Poh C.L. Advances in antigenic peptide-based vaccine and neutralizing antibodies against viruses causing hand, foot, and mouth disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1256. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Favoino E., Prete M., Catacchio G., Conteduca G., Perosa F. Cd20-mimotope peptides: A model to define the molecular basis of epitope spreading. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1920. doi: 10.3390/ijms20081920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Maddalena A., Papassotiropoulos A., Muller-Tillmanns B., Jung H.H., Hegi T., Nitsch R.M., Hock C. Biochemical diagnosis of alzheimer disease by measuring the cerebrospinal fluid ratio of phosphorylated tau protein to beta-amyloid peptide42. Arch. Neurol. 2003;60:1202–1206. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.9.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Tapiola T., Alafuzoff I., Herukka S.K., Parkkinen L., Hartikainen P., Soininen H., Pirttila T. Cerebrospinal fluid {beta}-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain. Arch. Neurol. 2009;66:382–389. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2008.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kalia L.V., Kalia S.K., McLean P.J., Lozano A.M., Lang A.E. Alpha-synuclein oligomers and clinical implications for parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 2013;73:155–169. doi: 10.1002/ana.23746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Shen N., Song G., Yang H., Lin X., Brown B., Hong Y., Cai J., Cao C. Identifying the pathological domain of alpha- synuclein as a therapeutic for parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2338. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Cohn M. Degeneracy, mimicry and crossreactivity in immune recognition. Mol. Immunol. 2005;42:651–655. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Cunto-Amesty G., Luo P., Monzavi-Karbassi B., Kieber-Emmons T. Exploiting molecular mimicry: Defining rules of the game. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2001;20:157–180. doi: 10.3109/08830180109043032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Fournel S., Muller S. Synthetic peptides in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2003;4:261–274. doi: 10.2174/1389203033487126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Jain D., Salunke D.M. Antibody specificity and promiscuity. Biochem. J. 2019;476:433–447. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20180670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Rose N.R., Mackay I.R. Molecular mimicry: A critical look at exemplary instances in human diseases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000;57:542–551. doi: 10.1007/PL00000716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Marasco D., Perretta G., Sabatella M., Ruvo M. Past and future perspectives of synthetic peptide libraries. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2008;9:447–467. doi: 10.2174/138920308785915209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Sandomenico A., Caporale A., Doti N., Cross S., Cruciani G., Chambery A., De Falco S., Ruvo M. Synthetic peptide libraries. From random mixtures to in vivo testing. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018 doi: 10.2174/0929867325666180716110833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Marcaurelle L.A., Seeberger P.H. Combinatorial carbohydrate chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002;6:289–296. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00322-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Sofia M.J. Carbohydrate-based combinatorial libraries. Mol. Divers. 1997;3:75–94. doi: 10.1023/A:1009650424835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Zhang Y., Lai B.S., Juhas M. Recent advances in aptamer discovery and applications. Molecules. 2019;24:941. doi: 10.3390/molecules24050941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Reymond J.L., Darbre T. Peptide and glycopeptide dendrimer apple trees as enzyme models and for biomedical applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012;10:1483–1492. doi: 10.1039/c2ob06938e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Sebestik J., Niederhafner P., Jezek J. Peptide and glycopeptide dendrimers and analogous dendrimeric structures and their biomedical applications. Amino Acids. 2011;40:301–370. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0707-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Haupt K., Linares A.V., Bompart M., Bui B.T. Molecularly imprinted polymers. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012;325:1–28. doi: 10.1007/128_2011_307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Takeuchi T., Sunayama H. Beyond natural antibodies—A new generation of synthetic antibodies created by post-imprinting modification of molecularly imprinted polymers. Chem. Commun. 2018;54:6243–6251. doi: 10.1039/C8CC02923G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Batra D., Shea K.J. Combinatorial methods in molecular imprinting. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003;7:434–442. doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(03)00060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ye L., Haupt K. Molecularly imprinted polymers as antibody and receptor mimics for assays, sensors and drug discovery. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004;378:1887–1897. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-2450-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Apte R.S. Pegaptanib sodium for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2008;9:499–508. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.3.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Babin B.M., Kasperkiewicz P., Janiszewski T., Yoo E., Dra G.M., Bogyo M. Leveraging peptide substrate libraries to design inhibitors of bacterial lon protease. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019;14:2453–2462. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Dooley C.T., Ferrer T., Pagan H., O’Corry-Crowe G.M. Bridging immunogenetics and immunoproteomics: Model positional scanning library analysis for major histocompatibility complex class ii dq in tursiops truncatus. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0201299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Nino-Vasquez J.J., Allicotti G., Borras E., Wilson D.B., Valmori D., Simon R., Martin R., Pinilla C. A powerful combination: The use of positional scanning libraries and biometrical analysis to identify cross-reactive t cell epitopes. Mol. Immunol. 2004;40:1063–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2003.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Pinilla C., Appel J.R., Judkowski V., Houghten R.A. Identification of b cell and t cell epitopes using synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries. Chapter 9. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2012:99. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im0905s99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Pulido D., Prats-Ejarque G., Villalba C., Albacar M., Moussaoui M., Andreu D., Volkmer R., Torrent M., Boix E. Positional scanning library applied to the human eosinophil cationic protein/rnase3 n-terminus reveals novel and potent anti-biofilm peptides. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;152:590–599. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Rut W., Kasperkiewicz P., Byzia A., Poreba M., Groborz K., Drag M. Recent advances and concepts in substrate specificity determination of proteases using tailored libraries of fluorogenic substrates with unnatural amino acids. Biol. Chem. 2015;396:329–337. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2014-0315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Diafa S., Hollenstein M. Generation of aptamers with an expanded chemical repertoire. Molecules. 2015;20:16643–16671. doi: 10.3390/molecules200916643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Gao S., Zheng X., Jiao B., Wang L. Post-selex optimization of aptamers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016;408:4567–4573. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9556-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Jijakli K., Khraiwesh B., Fu W., Luo L., Alzahmi A., Koussa J., Chaiboonchoe A., Kirmizialtin S., Yen L., Salehi-Ashtiani K. The in vitro selection world. Methods. 2016;106:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Pfeiffer F., Rosenthal M., Siegl J., Ewers J., Mayer G. Customised nucleic acid libraries for enhanced aptamer selection and performance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017;48:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Pinheiro V.B., Taylor A.I., Cozens C., Abramov M., Renders M., Zhang S., Chaput J.C., Wengel J., Peak-Chew S.Y., McLaughlin S.H., et al. Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution. Science. 2012;336:341–344. doi: 10.1126/science.1217622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Tan S.Y., Acquah C., Sidhu A., Ongkudon C.M., Yon L.S., Danquah M.K. Selex modifications and bioanalytical techniques for aptamer-target binding characterization. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016;46:521–537. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2016.1157014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Beckman R.A., Weiner L.M., Davis H.M. Antibody constructs in cancer therapy: Protein engineering strategies to improve exposure in solid tumors. Cancer. 2007;109:170–179. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]