Skip to main content
Discoveries logoLink to Discoveries
. 2013 Dec 31;1(1):e8. doi: 10.15190/d.2013.8

Akt modes of stem cell regulation: more than meets the eye?

Enzo Calautti 1,*
PMCID: PMC6941558  PMID: 32309540

Abstract

Akt signaling regulates many cellular functions that are essential for the proper balance between self-renewal and differentiation of tissue-specific and embryonic stem cells (SCs). However, the roles of Akt and its downstream signaling in SC regulation are rather complex, as Akt activation can either promote SC self-renewal or depletion in a context-dependent manner. In this review we have evidenced three "modes" of Akt-dependent SC regulation, which can be exemplified by three different SC types. In particular, we will discuss: 1) the integration of Akt signaling within the "core" SC signaling circuitry in the maintenance of SC self-renewal and pluripotency (embryonic SCs); 2) quantitative changes in Akt signaling in SC metabolic activity and exit from quiescence (hematopoietic SCs); 3) qualitative changes of Akt signaling in SC regulation: signaling compartment-talization and isoform-specific functions of Akt proteins in SC self-renewal and differentiation (limbal-corneal keratinocyte SCs). These diverse modes of action are not to be intended as mutually exclusive. Rather, it is likely that Akt proteins participate with multiple parallel mechanisms to regulation of the same SC type. We propose that under specific circumstances dictated by distinct developmental stages, differentiation programs or tissue culture conditions, one mode of Akt action prevails over the others in determining SC fates.

Keywords: Akt in stem cell biology, Akt signaling in stem cell self-renewal and differentiation, Akt signaling in metabolism and stress

Introduction

A stem cell (SC) is defined as an undifferentiated, long-lived proliferating cell with the capacity to self-renew and to generate progenies of cells primed to differentiate in one or more cell types1. With this dual function (or “stemness”), SCs allow the generation of tissues during development by building their basic cellular blocks, and their maintenance throughout lifetime by counter-balancing the continuous loss of differentiated or damaged cells.

The search of a common set of genes (the “stemness” genes) among embryonic, neural and hematopoietic SCs has failed to reveal a gene expression signature accounting for the SC status in all cell types analyzed2,3, and the emerging view is that in different contexts, stemness is maintained by largely independent cellular programs, each one suited to couple SC self-renewal and differentiation abilities with distinct developmental stages, tissue differentiation programs and cell turnover rates4-6.

In fact, besides playing their defining roles, SCs are first of all cells, and must regulate fundamental biological functions such as the ability to survive, to divide and migrate, to establish contacts with neighboring cells and the surrounding environment (niche), to regulate metabolism in response to nutrients availability, and to respond to a variety of external cues and cellular stresses. In particular, cell-protective mechanisms coincide with many of the conserved signaling pathways that regulate SC self-renewal and differentiation7. Therefore, maintenance of functional SC pools during the organism lifespan requires integration of SC-specific signaling mechanisms (the “core” SC signaling circuitries) with other key cellular programs, fitted to maintain “stemness” and tissue homeostasis in the context in which SCs operate.

Consistent with a role of SCs in aging8, it seems conceivable that stemness arose during evolution in parallel with the emergence of long-lived multicellular organisms, as a strategy to prolong lifespan via elimination and replacement of differentiated or damaged cells in increasingly complex tissues. One conserved molecular machinery coupling the cell responses to stresses and nutrients availability with the regulation of organismal aging and SC biology is the PI3K/Akt/FOXO/mTOR signaling network9,10. The most evolutionary conserved function of Akt signaling is the control of energy metabolism, which in mammalian cells is coupled to the ability to inhibit apoptosis and promote cell cycle progression (for review see11,12). Attenuation of the insulin/IGF-1-like (IIS) metabolic pathway as well as caloric restriction extends the lifespan of nematodes, fruit flies and mammals8,9,13,14. Effectors of lifespan extension induced by inhibition of IIS are the forkhead box O (FOXO) family of transcription factors, which are under the negative control of the IIS/PI3K/Akt pathway13,15-18. Individual or combined ablation of FOXO genes in mice leads to SCs depletion in various lineages19-21. Inhibition of mTORC1, a signaling complex activated by IIS/Akt signaling and nutrients22, also extends the lifespan of model organisms23-25, and mTORC1 pharmacological inhibition by rapamycin enhances SC functions in several contexts26-29. Moreover, a conserved role of FOXOs in limiting mTORC1 signaling by inducing the expression of mTORC1-inhibitory proteins has also been established30-32. However, in spite of the conserved functions of these Akt effectors pathways in organism lifespan and SC maintenance, the consequences of Akt activation in different SC types range from enhanced SC self-renewal33,34 to premature SC exhaustion35,36. In the attempt to reconcile these apparent paradoxes, we will provide here a simplified view of three diverse modalities by which Akt signaling regulates SC self-renewal and differentiation, exemplified by three different SC types.

Akt proteins and activation

Akt/PKB signaling is carried out by three homologous serine/threonine protein kinases (Akt1/PKBα, Akt2/PKBβ and Akt3/PKBγ) encoded by separate genes37,38. In response to a plethora of extracellular signals Akt kinases regulate fundamental cellular functions such as growth, survival, differentiation and energy metabolism39. Activation of Akt kinases normally occurs downstream of phosphoinositide-3 kinases (PI3K). Full enzymatic activation is achieved through a sequential process. Akt proteins are first recruited to the plasma membrane through their amino-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domains at sites enriched of PI3K lipid products (PI(3,4,5)P3 or PI(3,4)P2). At the plasma membrane, Akt proteins are phosphorylated at two conserved residues, the first one within the T-loop of the catalytic domain (Thr308 in Akt1) by the phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), and the second one within the carboxy-terminal hydrophobic motif (Ser473 in Akt1) by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2)40-42, albeit other protein kinases have also been found capable of phosphorylating the same Ser residue43. Although phosphorylation of Akt at both regulatory residues is critical for full kinase activation, it has been shown that in the absence of Ser473 phosphorylation, Akt is still capable to phosphorylate some, but not all its substrates41.

Akt proteins are localized to the plasma membrane following activation, and once activated, they distribute throughout different cell compartments including the nucleus, whereby they phosphorylate a multitude of substrates to regulate diverse cellular functions39. Akt kinases are inactivated by protein phosphatases such as the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), which dephosphorylates the regulatory Thr residue within the kinase domain44, and the family of plekstrin homology domain leucine-reach repeat protein phosphatases (PHLPP1 and PHLPP2) that dephosphorylate the Ser residue of the hydrophobic motif of Akt kinases in an isoform-specific manner45.

The overall PI3K/Akt signaling activity is negatively regulated by the tumor suppressor PTEN that dephosphorylates the PI3K lipid products, and by activation of the Akt downstream effector mTORC1, which in turn induces negative feedback mechanisms that limit PI3K activation (for review see46,47. Hyperactivated Akt is a common feature of many human cancers39 since, at least in part, it both provides protection from apoptosis and promotes uncontrolled cell-cycle progression48.

Studies of Akt isoform-specific knockout mice have recently suggested that besides playing redundant roles in cellular signaling, Akt isoenzymes have also specific biological functions49. Akt1 knockout mice have growth retardation50 and Akt1-null cells display higher rates of apoptosis, indicating a critical role for Akt1 in cell survival50,51. Akt2 knockout mice develop a type 2 diabetes-like phenotype, and cells derived from those mice show impaired glucose utilization52,53, suggesting a key role for Akt2 in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. Consistently, protein interaction studies have recently confirmed such a metabolic function for Akt254. A role for Akt3 in brain development has also been proposed since Akt3 knockout mice display decreased brain size55. Moreover, during tumor development, Akt1 and Akt2 often act in a complementary opposing manner37,38. Specific gain of function of Akt2 promotes migration and invasion in breast cancer epithelial cells, whereas Akt1 is mostly involved in cell proliferation and growth56. In addition, Akt2 induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition57,58, a process involved in de novo formation of breast cancer SCs59. Intriguingly, the differential roles of Akt isoforms in breast cancer SC have been found associated with a differential regulation of microRNA of the miR200 family by individual Akt isoforms60. One outstanding issue is how such signaling specificity is achieved in spite of the high structural homology of Akt isoforms.

Signals downstream of Akt protein kinases in SC regulation: life span, metabolism and stress

Key effectors of Akt signaling in SC regulation are the mTORC1 signaling complex, positively regulated by Akt signaling22, and the FOXO family of transcription factors, which are directly inhibited by Akt-dependent phosphorylation15-18.A persistently elevated mTORC1 activity causes an initial expansion followed by a later decline of several adult SC types26,61, whereas individual or combined ablation of FOXO genes in mice leads to SC depletion in various lineages19-21. In both fly and mammalian cells, FOXOs can restrain mTORC1 activity30,31,62,63, and this regulatory network has been recently implicated in stratified epithelial SC regulation64. Members of the FOXO class of transcription factors (FOXO1, -3, -4 and -6) regulate diverse gene expression programs and affect many cellular processes, including cell cycle regulation, cell survival and metabolism65,66. Two evolutionarily conserved pathways regulate FOXO activity: in the presence of growth factors, FOXOs are negatively regulated by the canonical IIS signaling pathway through PI3K and AKT65; FOXOs are activated instead in the presence of oxidative stress through Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)67. Additionally, many other signaling pathways and multiple post-translational modifications modulate FOXO activity65-69. All FOXO family members bind to the consensus sequence (5′-TTGTTTAC-3′), and therefore are thought to act redundantly, although selective functions of specific FOXO members have also been described. The FOXO homologue in Caenorhabditis elegans, daf-16, was genetically linked to daf-2, which encodes an insulin type receptor, and shown to mediate the lifespan extension resulting from daf-2 loss, thus providing evidence of a crucial role of the PI3K/Akt/FOXO signaling axis in lifespan control9. FOXOs integrate a multitude of signals from pathways that are sensitive to environmental changes, and the emerging view is that these transcription factors behave as key regulators of tissue homeostasis under stressful conditions10.

1) Integration of Akt signaling within the “core” pluripotency signaling network in the mainte-nance of SC self-renewal and pluripotency (embryonic SCs)

Murine embryonic SCs (mES cells) are cell lines derived from the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst70,71 and can be indefinitely expanded in an undifferentiated, pluripotent state by the addition of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) to the culture medium. ES cells need to tightly balance their gene expression program to prevent differentiation while maintaining pluripotency, which is executed by a gene network that is centered around the transcription factors OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG72. In addition to activating the Jack/Stat and the MEK/ERK pathways, LIF also engages the PI3K/Akt pathway in mES cells73. In these cells, ectopic expression of a myristoylated, active form of Akt is sufficient to maintain the pluripotent, undifferentiated cell phenotype in the absence of LIF74. Importantly, the effects of active Akt were found to be reversible, since deletion of the transgene restored both LIF dependence and pluripotent cell differentiation. It has been further demonstrated that LIF to Akt signaling is critical for maintaining elevated levels of ES cell-specific transcription factors such as Tbx3 and Nanog75,76, the latter being an essential determinant of the “naïve” ES cell pluripotent state77. Moreover, Akt has also been reported to phosphorylate and enhance the transcriptional activity of Sox278, another key factor in both ES cell pluripotency and reprogramming of somatic cells to induced-pluripotent stem cells (iPS).

Differently from mES cells, human ES (hES) cells do not depend on LIF signaling for self-renewal but rely on different combinations of exogenous factors including Activin, an agonist of Smad/2/3 signaling (for review see79). In hES cells, Activin favors pluripotency by promoting Nanog expression30,80 but also drives mesodermal differentiation when PI3K/Akt signaling is low81. hES cells can be maintained in a pluripotent, undifferentiated state under defined culture conditions requiring only three exogenous factors82, Activin, and two potent activators of PI3K/Akt signaling, heregulin and Igf-1. It has been shown that omission of extracellular Akt agonists or inhibition of Akt intracellular signaling promotes mesodermal differentiation. Since Activin/Smad2/3 signaling is also essential for hES self-renewal, it has been demonstrated that inhibition of PI3K/Akt activity skews the functions of Smads from self-renewal to differentiation. In particular, Akt activity, by restraining ERK and Wnt-β catenin signaling, on one hand maintains Smad-dependent Nanog expression, and on the other hand prevents Smads from activating mesodermal genes82.

Interestingly, proliferating ES cells have a metabolic signature that is reminiscent of that of quiescent hematopoietic SCs (HSCs). ES cells have a low mitochondrial mass compared to their differentiating cell progenies and cell differentiation parallels with a switch from glycolysis to a robust increase in mitochondrial oxidative activity83.

Since one of the most conserved effects of Akt activation is the increase in cellular glucose uptake and stimulation of oxidative metabolism, which are mediated in large part by inhibition of FOXOs and activation of mTORC1 signaling, how ES cells maintain high Akt activity to promote self-renewal, and at the same time maintain low oxidative rates is currently unclear. This would suggest that Akt proteins, in ES cells, are decoupled from some of their key signaling effectors in cell metabolism. Intriguingly, FOXO1 has been recently shown to be necessary for ES cell pluripotency, and to directly regulate OCT4 and SOX2 expression and functions in an Akt-independent manner84. How FOXO1 can be transcriptionally activated in these rapidly dividing cells, and how its activity is directed towards OCT4 and SOX2 deserve future investigation.

In summary, increasing experimental evidence indicates that in both mES and hES, Akt signaling participates to the “core” pluripotency network by impinging on Nanog expression, and that gains of Akt activity promote pluripotency and self-renewal at the expenses of differentiation, in a manner that is decoupled from activation of Akt metabolic effectors. However, the identities of the direct Akt effectors in this context are still unknown.

Differential roles of Akt signaling in tissue-specific SCs

In tissue-specific SCs, the long-term consequences of sustained Akt activation, such as that induced by PTEN deletion, range from enhanced SC expansion and maintenance like in neuronal and mammary gland progenitor cells33,34, to SC depletion in the hematopoietic system35,85. The mechanisms underlying these opposite roles of Akt signaling in different SC types are still unclear, and may include differential ability of Akt protein kinases to phosphorylate a subset of substrates under specific conditions, the strength and duration of Akt activity, the onset of negative feedbacks mechanisms, as well as cross talks with other key SC regulatory signaling pathways (Notch, Wnts, BMP, Activin/TGF-β), ultimately determining the choice of a SCs towards a specific fate.

2) Akt regulation of SC metabolism and quiescence (Hematopoietic Stem Cells)

Hematopoietic SCs (HSCs) are cells that give rise to the cellular constituents of blood for life-long. Although SC quiescence is not a general prerequisite of all stem cell types86,87, multipotent HSCs are typically slow cycling, and become activated to generate committed progenitor cells that replenish all the differentiated blood cell lineages. HSCs reside normally in hypoxic niches in the bone barrow88, and relatively low oxygen levels promote SC quiescence89,90 and glycolytic metabolism at the expenses of mitochondrial oxidative metabolism (reviewed by83,91), whereas physiological increases in reactive-oxygen species (ROS) are coupled with the differentiation switch20,36,92,93. Proper levels of ROS and maintenance of reversible quiescence play thus key roles in long-term HSC maintenance, since virtually every genetic or environmental manipulation permanently altering these parameters usually results in hematopoiesis abnormalities, including leukemia (reviewed by94).

Molecules downstream of Akt signaling, including FOXO transcription factors and the mTORC1 signaling complexes are critical mediators of the cell metabolic responses to changes in nutrients, growth factors and oxygen levels. Akt activation, by favoring glucose uptake metabolism, is a potent activator of glucose uptake and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. Moreover, mTORC1 signaling, which is negatively regulated by hypoxic conditions and positively by Akt, signaling, stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis (reviewed by95). The transcriptional activity of FOXO family members is stimulated by oxidative stress, and inhibited by Akt activation in response to growth factors, and FOXO target genes are crucial mediators of HSC quiescence, and resistance to oxidative stress.

In the hematopoietic system, PI3K/Akt/FOXO signaling plays critical roles in both HSC maintenance and lineage development96. Several hematopoietic growth factors and cytokines, such as erythropoietin, thrombopoietin, Stem Cell Factor (SCF, c-kit-ligand), Flt3 ligand, activate the PI3K/Akt pathway. FOXOs have a crucial role in several types of adult stem cells and as this role seems to be evolutionarily conserved, since they also regulates SC maintenance in Hydra vulgaris97. In mHSCs they favor SC maintenance and self-renewal ability19,20,98. In addition, FOXOs may protect HSCs from cell death by mediating resistance to physiological oxidative stress thorough catalase and superoxide dismutase. Indeed, whereas targeted deletion of FOXO in HSCs results in HSC exhaustion with concomitant increase in cellular ROS, treatment with an antioxidative agent could partially rescue this phenotype20,98. This role of FOXOs in maintaining the SC population over time also occurs in neural SCs21,99. Consistent with the suppression of PI3K/Akt signaling observed in HSCs, mTORC1 is downregulated in these cells and studies on TSC-1 knockdown have shown that mTORC1 inhibition is essential for HSCs quiescence98,100,101. Besides, HSCs functions decline with age and this is reportedly due to increased mTORC1 activity26.

Moreover, several developmental signaling pathways that also regulate adult hematopoiesis (Wnts, Notch and BMP)102, can potentially cross talk with the PI3K/Akt pathway at multiple levels. Quantitative abnormalities in Akt signaling have a deep impact on HSC biology. For instance, in murine HSCs, both conditional deletion of PTEN35,85 and overexpression of a constitutively activated myrAkt103 cause loss of quiescence, transient expansion of HSCs, followed by long-term SC decline. Importantly, in both experimental settings, the exhaustion of HSCs is paralleled by the development of leukemia-like hematological disorders. On the other hand, the combined deletion of Akt1 and Akt2, the two main Akt isoforms expressed by hematopoietic cells, results in exaggerated SC quiescence, reduced ROS production, and impaired cell differentiation, consistent with the notion that physiological levels of ROS are involved in the switch between HSC quiescence and differentiation104. Serial HSC transplantation was impaired by Akt1/Akt2 deficiency, albeit individual deletion of either Akt isoform had little or no effect. Overall, these studies indicate that HSCs are extremely sensitive to the overall levels of Akt signaling output, and whereas normal Akt signaling is required to balance SC self- renewal with normal ROS production and differentiation, either too much or too little Akt activity eventually result in SC failure.

Several transcription factors are necessary for HSC self-renewal, among which GATA2, GFI1, TEL, JUNB, SOX17 and PU.1102 . Although phosphorylation of GATA2 by Akt has been reported to regulate adipose cell differentiation105, it is currently unknown whether a similar mechanism is also involved in HSCs self-renewal and differentiation. Inhibition of PI3K/Akt/ mTORC1 signaling also inhibits T cell differentiation, and prevents downregulation of the GFI1 transcription factor106. However, whether or not Akt signaling plays a direct role in the regulation of the core HSC transcriptional network remains to be established.

On the other hand, there is accumulating evidence that Akt directly participates to the epigenetic regulation of HSCs by phosphorylating Bmi1, one key component of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 (PRC1), at Ser 316, thereby favoring de-repression of the Ink4a-Arf locus, which encodes for p16/Ink4a and p19/Arf proteins that promote cell cycle arrest and cell senescence. Importantly, ablation of Bmi1 in mice also leads to failure of several SC types including HSCs107, and more in general, defects in either PRC1 or PRC2 functions hamper SC self-renewal in several cell types, including HSCs108. Akt also phosphory-lates the EZH2 catalytic component of PRC2, thereby counteracting its repressive activity on gene expression109. Therefore, under conditions of persistently elevated Akt activation, such as PTEN loss, HSC exhaustion may depend in part on cell senescence favored by loss of Polycomb repressive activity at the Ink4a-Arf locus.

It has been shown that mTORC1 inhibition by rapamycin rescues the exhaustion of normal HSCs and prevents the onset of leukemia following PTEN loss in vivo35. Consistently, conditional deletion of the mTORC1 negative regulator TSC1 in murine HSCs provokes loss of SC quiescence, increased mitochondrial biogenesis and ROS production, with subsequent failure of hematopoiesis and HSC self-renewal101. Importantly, the effects of TSC1 deletion were rescued by treatment of cells with ROS antagonists. Since Akt phosphorylates TSC1/ TSC2 complexes to release their inhibitory activity on mTORC1, these data strongly suggest that the PTEN/Akt/mTORC1 axis normally plays important roles in the normal balance between HSC self-renewal and differentiation and in PTEN/Akt-induced HSC exhaustion and leukemogenesis (for review see 95).

Consistently, in murine HSCs, conditional deletion of Raptor, an essential component of mTORC1, severely hampers hematopoiesis leading to pancytopenia, splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis and abnormalities in differentiation110. Raptor-deficient HSCs display abnormalities in transplantation assays and impaired regenerative potential upon sub lethal irradiation. Notably, Raptor depletion also halts leukemic progression in PTEN-deficient HSCs.

On the other hand, the conditional deletion of Rictor (an essential component of mTORC2) in adult mice has no effects on basal hematopoiesis, but prevents both SC exhaustion and leukemogenesis induced by PTEN loss111. These data are consistent with a model in which mTORC1 plays key roles in both normal SC maintenance and Akt-driven SC depletion, while mTORC2, by favoring Akt activation from upstream, becomes a limiting factor in cellular processes that rely on maximal Akt signaling outputs, such as those causing HSC depletion and leukemogenesis.

Altogether, these studies provide compelling evidence that mTORC1 signaling activity is essential for normal hematopoiesis and represents a driving force behind HSC depletion and leukemia progression downstream of the PTEN/Akt axis.

Thus, mTORC2 and mTORC1 appear to represent respectively an essential regulator and a key effector of Akt activation in both HSC depletion and leukemogenesis induced by PTEN loss. Does this mean that FOXOs, established regulators of HSC maintenance and direct Akt targets, do not play a role in this process? Sustained Akt activation downstream of PTEN loss is expected to lead to FOXO inactivation, and since FOXO loss of function per se drives HSC depletion, it is conceivable that also in the context of PTEN loss, Akt-dependent FOXO inactivation may contribute to SC depletion. Intriguingly, several direct FOXO target genes including sestrin3,32,112 and the direct TORC1 inhibitor TSC1 have the potential to restrain mTORC1 signaling via different mechanisms. Notably, this FOXO-dependent mTORC1 inhibition has been shown to take place under different experimental conditions and is though to represent a conserved cellular response to cellular stress conditions between flies to mammals113. Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that in cultured human limbal keratinocyte SCs, the Akt2/FOXO/mTORC1 signaling axis is a critical determinant of epithelial stem cell exhaustion, at least in culture64, suggesting that this cross talk may be important also in the regulation of other SC types in which robust Akt signaling to FOXO plays a role in SC depletion. Since both FOXOs and TSC1 deletion in HSCs result in SC depletion and exaggerated ROS accumulation, and in both cases SC depletion is counteracted by ROS scavengers, this further suggests a convergence of FOXO and mTORC1 signaling on similar cellular process in HSC regulation. Therefore, it would be interesting to test whether or not the HSC decline induced by loss of FOXOs can be rescued in part by rapamycin treatment, like in the case of PTEN loss. Should this not be the case, this would suggest that FOXOs might become desensitized to Akt inhibition due to activation of other cellular pathways. It has been reported that in certain cellular contexts, transcriptional activation of FOXOs by JNK upon stress including oxidative damage, dominates over the ability of Akt to inactivate FOXOs67. Clarifying the role of FOXOs in Akt-induce SC depletion and leukemogenesis is of key therapeutic relevance, since it has been recently reported that in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) cells, FOXOs favors the maintenance of cells with the properties of leukemia-initiating cells. Unexpectedly, either Akt activation or FOXO inhibition induce apoptosis and promote myeloid differentiation of AML cells, reverting the established paradigm of Akt behaving as an oncogene, and FOXOs as tumor suppressors. Interestingly, AML cells that escape from Akt-induced FOXO inactivation or loss of FOXO expression, become sensitive to JNK inhibitors, suggesting that JNK activation probably favors the selection of AML cells capable to withstand the loss of FOXOs, providing a rationale for the employment of JNK inhibitors in antileukemic therapy. Importantly, quiescence is a property shared by normal multipotent HSCs and Leukemia–initiating cells.

3) Akt signaling selectivity in SC regulation: subcellular compartmentalization and isoform-specific functions of Akt proteins in human limbal keratinocyte stem cells (hLSCs)

The cornea is the most important light refracting structure of the eye, and the integrity of its stratified epithelium is key for visual acuity. In adult humans, the self-renewal of the corneal epithelium relies on keratinocyte SC populations that reside in the basal epithelial layer of the limbus, the narrow transitional zone at the boundaries between the cornea and the bulbar conjunctiva114-121. Pathological conditions leading to loss of limbus integrity result in severe visual impairment or blindness. The similarities between human limbal- and epidermal keratinocytes, which have been extensively employed in cellular therapies for treating burn patients, have allowed the establishment of culture conditions apt to propagate hLSCs ex vivo for use in therapeutic transplants17-19,121-123. Culture of human limbal keratinocytes (LKs) in the presence of a fibroblast feeder layer124 plus additional factors, including fetal bovine serum, Insulin and Epidermal Growth Factor, originate three types of colonies, namely, holoclones, meroclones and paraclones117,122, of which holoclones possess all the defining features of cultured SCs such as long-term self-renewal and the capacity to regenerate tissue in vivo125,126. We have recently explored the role of Akt signaling in the biology of hLSCs64.

We have found that in human corneal tissue, the distribution of active Akt proteins nearly overlaps with that of the putative LSCs marker p63, which, under homeostatic conditions, is confined to the basal layer of the limbal epithelium127,128. Moreover, few differentiating cells moving to the suprabasal differentiated cell layers, expressing low levels of p63, also display high levels of Akt activation.

The progenies of cultured human primary limbal keratinocyte holoclones have also higher Akt activity as compared to those generated SC-depleted clones. We found that a transient inhibition of PI3K or Akt activity impairs the clonogenic potential of the progenies of treated cells in spite of having little or no effects on the cell cycle, suggesting that PI3K to Akt signaling has important roles in LSC self-renewal.

By investigating the roles of Akt1 and Akt2, the two Akt isoforms expressed in LKs, we found that whereas Akt1 silencing anticipated SC exhaustion, Akt2 depletion had an unexpected effect on cultured LSCs self-renewal ability, since it significantly enhanced both clonogenic potential and lifespan of cultured cells and interfered with differentiation and senescence cellular programs. Consistently, in Akt2-deficient mice, the amounts of progenitor cells expressing the p63 limbal stem cell marker is increased, suggesting that Akt2 deficiency also affects LSC biology in vivo.

Our data indicated that signaling specificity rather than drops in global Akt activity underlies the SC phenotype of Akt2-deficient LKs, since their sustained self-renewal ability can be selectively reverted by ectopic re-expression of a normal Akt2 protein, but not by comparable levels of either kinase-dead Akt2 or wild-type Akt1. Akt2 depletion selectively attenuates growth factors signaling to both FOXOs and mTORC1, albeit in a hierarchical manner, whereby an increase in FOXOs expression and transcriptional activity leads to mTORC1 inhibition by promoting the expression of its negative regulator TSC1. Thus, our work provides direct evidence that the conserved FOXO/mTORC1 axis participates to the SC regulation, and that at least in this particular SC type, one single hit (Akt2 depletion) is sufficient to enhance FOXO functions and to restrain mTORC1 activity.

Our work has indicated that the mechanistic bases of the differential effects of Akt1 and Akt2 reside mostly in their differential subcellular distribution; whereas Akt2 protein is both nuclear and cytosolic, Akt1 is found almost exclusively in the cytosol, but when its expression is enforced in the nuclear compartment via a nuclear localization signal peptide, Akt1 acquires the ability to revert the SC phenotype of Akt2-deficient cells and to phosphorylate FOXO molecules. These data suggest that is not Akt2 per se, but rather its nuclear distribution that drives LSC depletion.

Our study opens up many additional questions that need to be addressed to shed light on the complexity of Akt functions in SC regulation. Does the effect of Akt2 depletion reflect the well-established role of Akt2 in metabolism control? Consistent with the notion that oxidative stress represents one major determinant of cultured cell senescence29, our unpublished data indicate that Akt2-depleted LSCs display enhanced resistance to oxidative damage. It is worth remembering that the ocular surface is highly exposed to oxidative stress7, and that corneal epithelial cells have large stores of glycogen that is used as a primary energy source. Akt signaling has been recently shown to couple hypoxic signaling with glycogen metabolism in the limbal-corneal tissue129. It would be interesting to investigate how individual Akt isoforms regulate these functions in the context of LSC self-renewal and differentiation.

Another key issue is to better understand the molecular determinants of Akt proteins nuclear distribution. This aspect of research seems particularly relevant for SC biology since it would explain how Akt proteins are targeted to transcriptionally active FOXO proteins as well as to other nuclear targets potentially involved in SC regulation. However, the molecular determinants of Akt isoforms nuclear distribution are still poorly understood, and the possible underlying mechanisms include phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and interaction with specific protein partners38,130.

How nuclear Akt signaling integrates in the core transcriptional programs and epigenetic regulation of LSCs and other SC types regulated by similar control mechanisms (such as for instance epidermal keratinocyte SCs)? Our work suggests a tight correlation between PI3K/Akt/FOXO signaling and p63 regulation, and Akt2-depleted cells express high levels of ΔNp63α the p63 isoform most involved in the regulation epithelial SC proliferative potential131. Previous work has indicated that PI3K signaling positively regulates p63 expression at the transcriptional level132. Moreover, the IIS/FOXO pathway has been recently shown to regulate p63- dependent gene expression in the establishment of epidermal stratification during mouse development133. Our work suggests that p63 may be both positively and negatively regulated by Akt signaling, and these findings may have translational implications in regenerative medicine, since high levels of ΔNp63α expression correlate with the success of cultured LSC grafts in therapeutic settings119,126.

Notably, our studies indicating that Akt2 opposes normal epithelial SC functions are apparently at odds with the notion that in a human immortalized breast cell line, Akt2 favors de novo formation of cancer SCs57-60. Hence, we believe that caution should be taken when interpreting the biological function of Akt signaling in normal epithelial cells or in immortalized and/or transformed cell lines that already evaded fail-safe mechanisms of tumor suppression.

Conclusions

PI3K/Akt signaling has been shown to either promote or oppose SC maintenance. Although a large number of studies indicate a close link between metabolic pathways and SC regulation by Akt kinases, we still have a very limited understanding about the integration of these processes by Akt family members. In this review, we have provided three different examples of modalities (Figure 1) by which Akt signaling regulates SCs in three different biological contexts. These diverse “modes” of Akt action are not to be intended as mutually exclusive. On the contrary, it is likely that Akt proteins participate with multiple parallel mechanisms to regulation of the same SC type. We propose that under specific circumstances dictated by distinct developmental stages, differentiation programs or tissue culture conditions, one “mode” of Akt action prevails over the others in determining the SC fate.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the three “modes” of Akt signaling described in the main text.

Figure 1

a) in mouse embryonic stem cells (mES), Akt signaling favors self-renewal and pluripotency at the expenses of cell differentiation (not shown); b) in hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), quantitative changes in Akt signaling outputs determine different SC fates: normal Akt signaling favors self-renewal (low Akt signaling), while an increase of activity (high Akt signaling) favors exit from quiescence and commitment to differentiation c) in human limbal keratinocyte stem cells (hLSC), a different ratio between Akt isoforms activity in discrete subcellular compartments shifts the balance between SC self-renewal and differentiation.

  • Akt and its downstream signaling effector molecules play key roles in SC self-renewal and differentiation, in a context dependent manner

Future AIMS and Open QUESTIONS:

  • Define the interconnections between Akt signaling that govern metabolic/stress events and stem cell specific functions, namely self-renewal and differentiation

  • Determine specific roles of Akt isoforms in stem cell regulation: differential response to stimuli, specific subcellular distribution and substrate specificity

  • Define the functions of Akt isoforms and their downstream targets; this is crucial for implement-tation of PI3K/Akt pharmacological treatments into the clinic, both in disease and aging, as well as for producing functional SCs for regenerative medicine

  • Manipulate metabolic and stress pathways in order to implement normal stem cell therapies and/or target cancer stem cells

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. The author also apologizes that, because of space restrictions, some references to original papers may not have been included in this review. The financial supports of Telethon Foundation (TCP 06001), the Piedmont Region (PISTEM and Converging Technologies Grants) to E.C. are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Conflict of interests: The author declares no competing financial interests.

Abbreviations

Stem cell (SC); mouse embryonic stem cell (mES); hematopoietic stem cell (HSC); human limbal keratinocyte stem cells (hLSC)

DISCOVERIES is a peer-reviewed, open access, online, multidisciplinary and integrative journal, publishing high impact and innovative manuscripts from all areas related to MEDICINE, BIOLOGY and CHEMISTRY

References

  • 1.Stem cells: units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Weissman Irving L. Cell. 2000;100(1):157-168. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81692-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.A stem cell molecular signature. Ivanova Natalia B, Dimos John T, Schaniel Christoph, Hackney Jason A, Moore Kateri A, Lemischka Ihor R. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2002;298(5593):601–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1073823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3."Stemness": transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Ramalho-Santos Miguel, Yoon Soonsang, Matsuzaki Yumi, Mulligan Richard C, Melton Douglas A. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2002;298(5593):597–600. doi: 10.1126/science.1072530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Portrait of a stem cell. Burns Caroline Erter, Zon Leonard I. Developmental cell. 2002;3(5):612–3. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00329-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.STEM CELLS: 'Stemness' Genes Still Elusive. Vogel G. Science. 2003;302(5644):371a-371. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5644.371a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Comment on " 'Stemness': Transcriptional Profiling of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells" and "A Stem Cell Molecular Signature" (I) Fortunel N. O. Science. 2003;302(5644):393b-393. doi: 10.1126/science.1086384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stress and stem cells. Tower John. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology. 2012;1(6):789-802. doi: 10.1002/wdev.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The Hallmarks of Aging. López-Otín Carlos, Blasco Maria A., Partridge Linda, Serrano Manuel, Kroemer Guido. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The genetics of ageing. Kenyon Cynthia J. Nature. 2010;464(7288):504-512. doi: 10.1038/nature08980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.FOXOs: signalling integrators for homeostasis maintenance. Eijkelenboom Astrid, Burgering Boudewijn M. T. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2013;14(2):83-97. doi: 10.1038/nrm3507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Akt-dependent transformation: there is more to growth than just surviving. Plas David R, Thompson Craig B. Oncogene. 2005;24(50):7435-7442. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mitochondrial hexokinases, novel mediators of the antiapoptotic effects of growth factors and Akt. Robey R B, Hay N. Oncogene. 2006;25(34):4683-4696. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.The Critical Role of Metabolic Pathways in Aging. Barzilai N., Huffman D. M., Muzumdar R. H., Bartke A. Diabetes. 2012;61(6):1315-1322. doi: 10.2337/db11-1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Extending Healthy Life Span--From Yeast to Humans. Fontana L., Partridge L., Longo V. D. Science. 2010;328(5976):321-326. doi: 10.1126/science.1172539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The Fork head transcription factor DAF-16 transduces insulin-like metabolic and longevity signals in C. elegans. Ogg Scott, Paradis Suzanne, Gottlieb Shoshanna, Patterson Garth I., Lee Linda, Tissenbaum Heidi A., Ruvkun Gary. Nature. 1997;389(6654):994-999. doi: 10.1038/40194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Akt Promotes Cell Survival by Phosphorylating and Inhibiting a Forkhead Transcription Factor. Brunet Anne, Bonni Azad, Zigmond Michael J, Lin Michael Z, Juo Peter, Hu Linda S, Anderson Michael J, Arden Karen C, Blenis John, Greenberg Michael E. Cell. 1999;96(6):857-868. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80595-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Phosphorylation of Serine 256 by Protein Kinase B Disrupts Transactivation by FKHR and Mediates Effects of Insulin on Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-1 Promoter Activity through a Conserved Insulin Response Sequence. Guo Shaodong, Rena Graham, Cichy Stephen, He Xiaowei, Cohen Philip, Unterman Terry. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(24):17184-17192. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1. Medema René H., Kops Geert J. P. L., Bos Johannes L., Burgering Boudewijn M. T. Nature. 2000;404(6779):782-787. doi: 10.1038/35008115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Foxo3a Is Essential for Maintenance of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Pool. Miyamoto Kana, Araki Kiyomi Y., Naka Kazuhito, Arai Fumio, Takubo Keiyo, Yamazaki Satoshi, Matsuoka Sahoko, Miyamoto Takeshi, Ito Keisuke, Ohmura Masako, Chen Chen, Hosokawa Kentaro, Nakauchi Hiromitsu, Nakayama Keiko, Nakayama Keiichi I., Harada Mine, Motoyama Noboru, Suda Toshio, Hirao Atsushi. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(1):101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.FoxOs Are Critical Mediators of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Resistance to Physiologic Oxidative Stress. Tothova Zuzana, Kollipara Ramya, Huntly Brian J., Lee Benjamin H., Castrillon Diego H., Cullen Dana E., McDowell Elizabeth P., Lazo-Kallanian Suzan, Williams Ifor R., Sears Christopher, Armstrong Scott A., Passegué Emmanuelle, DePinho Ronald A., Gilliland D. Gary. Cell. 2007;128(2):325-339. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.FoxO3 Regulates Neural Stem Cell Homeostasis. Renault Valérie M., Rafalski Victoria A., Morgan Alex A., Salih Dervis A.M., Brett Jamie O., Webb Ashley E., Villeda Saul A., Thekkat Pramod U., Guillerey Camille, Denko Nicholas C., Palmer Theo D., Butte Atul J., Brunet Anne. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(5):527-539. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Zoncu Roberto, Efeyan Alejo, Sabatini David M. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2010;12(1):21-35. doi: 10.1038/nrm3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lifespan extension by conditions that inhibit translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Hansen Malene, Taubert Stefan, Crawford Douglas, Libina Nataliya, Lee Seung-Jae, Kenyon Cynthia. Aging Cell. 2007;6(1):95-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Genetics: Influence of TOR kinase on lifespan in C. elegans. Vellai Tibor, Takacs-Vellai Krisztina, Zhang Yue, Kovacs Attila L., Orosz László, Müller Fritz. Nature. 2003;426(6967):620-620. doi: 10.1038/426620a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Harrison David E., Strong Randy, Sharp Zelton Dave, Nelson James F., Astle Clinton M., Flurkey Kevin, Nadon Nancy L., Wilkinson J. Erby, Frenkel Krystyna, Carter Christy S., Pahor Marco, Javors Martin A., Fernandez Elizabeth, Miller Richard A. Nature. 2009 doi: 10.1038/nature08221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.mTOR Regulation and Therapeutic Rejuvenation of Aging Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Chen C., Liu Y., Liu Y., Zheng P. Science Signaling. 2009;2(98):ra75-ra75. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.mTORC1 in the Paneth cell niche couples intestinal stem-cell function to calorie intake. Yilmaz Ömer H, Katajisto Pekka, Lamming Dudley W, Gültekin Yetis, Bauer-Rowe Khristian E, Sengupta Shomit, Birsoy Kivanc, Dursun Abdulmetin, Yilmaz V Onur, Selig Martin, Nielsen G Petur, Mino-Kenudson Mari, Zukerberg Lawrence R, Bhan Atul K, Deshpande Vikram, Sabatini David M. Nature. 2012;486(7404):490–5. doi: 10.1038/nature11163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Plzf Regulates Germline Progenitor Self-Renewal by Opposing mTORC1. Hobbs Robin M., Seandel Marco, Falciatori Ilaria, Rafii Shahin, Pandolfi Pier Paolo. Cell. 2010;142(3):468-479. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.mTOR Inhibition Prevents Epithelial Stem Cell Senescence and Protects from Radiation-Induced Mucositis. Iglesias-Bartolome Ramiro, Patel Vyomesh, Cotrim Ana, Leelahavanichkul Kantima, Molinolo Alfredo A., Mitchell James B., Gutkind J. Silvio. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11(3):401-414. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Akt Determines Replicative Senescence and Oxidative or Oncogenic Premature Senescence and Sensitizes Cells to Oxidative Apoptosis. Nogueira Veronique, Park Youngkyu, Chen Chia-Chen, Xu Pei-Zhang, Chen Mei-Ling, Tonic Ivana, Unterman Terry, Hay Nissim. Cancer Cell. 2008;14(6):458-470. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.FoxOs Inhibit mTORC1 and Activate Akt by Inducing the Expression of Sestrin3 and Rictor. Chen Chia-Chen, Jeon Sang-Min, Bhaskar Prashanth T., Nogueira Veronique, Sundararajan Deepa, Tonic Ivana, Park Youngkyu, Hay Nissim. Developmental Cell. 2010;18(4):592-604. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.FOXO3a Regulates Glycolysis via Transcriptional Control of Tumor Suppressor TSC1. Khatri Shikha, Yepiskoposyan Hasmik, Gallo Catherine A., Tandon Preeti, Plas David R. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(21):15960-15965. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.121871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pten Deletion in Adult Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Enhances Constitutive Neurogenesis. Gregorian C., Nakashima J., Le Belle J., Ohab J., Kim R., Liu A., Smith K. B., Groszer M., Garcia A. D., Sofroniew M. V., Carmichael S. T., Kornblum H. I., Liu X., Wu H. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29(6):1874-1886. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3095-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Regulation of Mammary Stem/Progenitor Cells by PTEN/Akt/β-Catenin Signaling. Korkaya Hasan, Paulson Amanda, Charafe-Jauffret Emmanuelle, Ginestier Christophe, Brown Marty, Dutcher Julie, Clouthier Shawn G., Wicha Max S. PLoS Biology. 2009;7(6):e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pten dependence distinguishes haematopoietic stem cells from leukaemia-initiating cells. Yilmaz Omer H, Valdez Riccardo, Theisen Brian K, Guo Wei, Ferguson David O, Wu Hong, Morrison Sean J. Nature. 2006;441(7092):475–82. doi: 10.1038/nature04703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Regulation of oxidative stress by ATM is required for self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Ito Keisuke, Hirao Atsushi, Arai Fumio, Matsuoka Sahoko, Takubo Keiyo, Hamaguchi Isao, Nomiyama Kana, Hosokawa Kentaro, Sakurada Kazuhiro, Nakagata Naomi, Ikeda Yasuo, Mak Tak W., Suda Toshio. Nature. 2004;431(7011):997-1002. doi: 10.1038/nature02989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Akt1 and Akt2: differentiating the aktion. Heron-Milhavet Lisa, Khouya Nabil, Fernandez Anne, Lamb Ned J. Histology and histopathology. 2011;26(5):651–62. doi: 10.14670/HH-26.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.The Akt kinases: Isoform specificity in metabolism and cancer. Gonzalez Eva, McGraw Timothy E. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(16):2502-2508. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.16.9335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating Downstream. Manning Brendan D., Cantley Lewis C. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Phosphorylation and Regulation of Akt/PKB by the Rictor-mTOR Complex. Sarbassov D. D. Science. 2005;307(5712):1098-1101. doi: 10.1126/science.1106148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ablation in Mice of the mTORC Components raptor, rictor, or mLST8 Reveals that mTORC2 Is Required for Signaling to Akt-FOXO and PKCα, but Not S6K1. Guertin David A., Stevens Deanna M., Thoreen Carson C., Burds Aurora A., Kalaany Nada Y., Moffat Jason, Brown Michael, Fitzgerald Kevin J., Sabatini David M. Developmental Cell. 2006;11(6):859-871. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Multiallelic Disruption of the rictor Gene in Mice Reveals that mTOR Complex 2 Is Essential for Fetal Growth and Viability. Shiota Chiyo, Woo Jeong-Taek, Lindner Jill, Shelton Kathy D., Magnuson Mark A. Developmental Cell. 2006;11(4):583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Inhibition of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) suppresses activation of protein kinase B/Akt and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of PTEN-mutant prostate cancer cells. Persad S., Attwell S., Gray V., Delcommenne M., Troussard A., Sanghera J., Dedhar S. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(7):3207-3212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060579697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Low expression of PP2A regulatory subunit B55α is associated with T308 phosphorylation of AKT and shorter complete remission duration in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Ruvolo P P, Qui Y H, Coombes K R, Zhang N, Ruvolo V R, Borthakur G, Konopleva M, Andreeff M, Kornblau S M. Leukemia. 2011;25(11):1711-1717. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.PHLPP and a Second Isoform, PHLPP2, Differentially Attenuate the Amplitude of Akt Signaling by Regulating Distinct Akt Isoforms. Brognard John, Sierecki Emma, Gao Tianyan, Newton Alexandra C. Molecular Cell. 2007;25(6):917-931. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.The Two TORCs and Akt. Bhaskar Prashanth T., Hay Nissim. Developmental Cell. 2007;12(4):487-502. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.The PTEN–PI3K pathway: of feedbacks and cross-talks. Carracedo A, Pandolfi P P. Oncogene. 2008;27(41):5527-5541. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Activation of Akt/Protein Kinase B Overcomes a G2/M Cell Cycle Checkpoint Induced by DNA Damage. Kandel E. S., Skeen J., Majewski N., Di Cristofano A., Pandolfi P. P., Feliciano C. S., Gartel A., Hay N. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2002;22(22):7831-7841. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.22.7831-7841.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Physiological roles of PKB/Akt isoforms in development and disease. Dummler B., Hemmings B.A. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2007;35(2):231-235. doi: 10.1042/BST0350231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Akt1/PKBα Is Required for Normal Growth but Dispensable for Maintenance of Glucose Homeostasis in Mice. Cho Han, Thorvaldsen Joanne L., Chu Qingwei, Feng Fei, Birnbaum Morris J. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(42):38349-38352. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100462200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Growth retardation and increased apoptosis in mice with homozygous disruption of the Akt1 gene. Chen W S, Xu P Z, Gottlob K, Chen M L, Sokol K, Shiyanova T, Roninson I, Weng W, Suzuki R, Tobe K, Kadowaki T, Hay N. Genes & development. 2001;15(17):2203–8. doi: 10.1101/gad.913901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Severe diabetes, age-dependent loss of adipose tissue, and mild growth deficiency in mice lacking Akt2/PKBβ. Garofalo Robert S., Orena Stephen J., Rafidi Kristina, Torchia Anthony J., Stock Jeffrey L., Hildebrandt Audrey L., Coskran Timothy, Black Shawn C., Brees Dominique J., Wicks Joan R., McNeish John D., Coleman Kevin G. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2003;112(2):197-208. doi: 10.1172/JCI16885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Insulin resistance and a diabetes mellitus-like syndrome in mice lacking the protein kinase Akt2 (PKB beta). Cho H, Mu J, Kim J K, Thorvaldsen J L, Chu Q, Crenshaw E B, Kaestner K H, Bartolomei M S, Shulman G I, Birnbaum M J. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2001;292(5522):1728–31. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5522.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Systematic Analysis Reveals Elongation Factor 2 and α-Enolase as Novel Interaction Partners of AKT2. Bottermann Katharina, Reinartz Michael, Barsoum Marian, Kötter Sebastian, Gödecke Axel. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e66045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Essential role of protein kinase B gamma (PKB gamma/Akt3) in postnatal brain development but not in glucose homeostasis. Tschopp Oliver, Yang Zhong-Zhou, Brodbeck Daniela, Dummler Bettina A, Hemmings-Mieszczak Maja, Watanabe Takashi, Michaelis Thomas, Frahm Jens, Hemmings Brian A. Development (Cambridge, England) 2005;132(13):2943–54. doi: 10.1242/dev.01864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Overexpression of AKT2/protein kinase Bbeta leads to up-regulation of beta1 integrins, increased invasion, and metastasis of human breast and ovarian cancer cells. Arboleda M Jane, Lyons John F, Kabbinavar Fairooz F, Bray Mark R, Snow Bryan E, Ayala Raul, Danino Mordechai, Karlan Beth Y, Slamon Dennis J. Cancer research. 2003;63(1):196–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stem cell and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers are frequently overexpressed in circulating tumor cells of metastatic breast cancer patients. Aktas Bahriye, Tewes Mitra, Fehm Tanja, Hauch Siegfried, Kimmig Rainer, Kasimir-Bauer Sabine. Breast cancer research : BCR. 2009;11(4):R46. doi: 10.1186/bcr2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Distinct roles of Akt1 and Akt2 in regulating cell migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Irie Hanna Y, Pearline Rachel V, Grueneberg Dorre, Hsia Maximilian, Ravichandran Preethi, Kothari Nayantara, Natesan Sridaran, Brugge Joan S. The Journal of cell biology. 2005;171(6):1023–34. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200505087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Mani Sendurai A, Guo Wenjun, Liao Mai-Jing, Eaton Elinor Ng, Ayyanan Ayyakkannu, Zhou Alicia Y, Brooks Mary, Reinhard Ferenc, Zhang Cheng Cheng, Shipitsin Michail, Campbell Lauren L, Polyak Kornelia, Brisken Cathrin, Yang Jing, Weinberg Robert A. Cell. 2008;133(4):704–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.MicroRNAs differentially regulated by Akt isoforms control EMT and stem cell renewal in cancer cells. Iliopoulos Dimitrios, Polytarchou Christos, Hatziapostolou Maria, Kottakis Filippos, Maroulakou Ioanna G, Struhl Kevin, Tsichlis Philip N. Science signaling. 2009;2(92):ra62. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.mTOR mediates Wnt-induced epidermal stem cell exhaustion and aging. Castilho Rogerio M, Squarize Cristiane H, Chodosh Lewis A, Williams Bart O, Gutkind J Silvio. Cell stem cell. 2009;5(3):279–89. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Drosophila Melted modulates FOXO and TOR activity. Teleman Aurelio A, Chen Ya-Wen, Cohen Stephen M. Developmental cell. 2005;9(2):271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Interplay between FOXO, TOR, and Akt. Hay Nissim. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2011;1813(11):1965–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nuclear Akt2 opposes limbal keratinocyte stem cell self-renewal by repressing a FOXO-mTORC1 signaling pathway. Saoncella Stefania, Tassone Beatrice, Deklic Erika, Avolio Fabio, Jon Cristina, Tornillo Giusy, De Luca Elisa, Di Iorio Enzo, Piva Roberto, Cabodi Sara, Turco Emilia, Pandolfi Pier Paolo, Calautti Enzo. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2014;32(3):754–69. doi: 10.1002/stem.1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stressing the role of FoxO proteins in lifespan and disease. van der Horst Armando, Burgering Boudewijn M T. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2007;8(6):440–50. doi: 10.1038/nrm2190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.The FoxO code. Calnan D R, Brunet A. Oncogene. 2008;27(16):2276–88. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Integrating opposing signals toward Forkhead box O. van den Berg Maaike C W, Burgering Boudewijn M T. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2011;14(4):607–21. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Unravelling the tumor-suppressive functions of FOXO proteins. Dansen Tobias B, Burgering Boudewijn M T. Trends in cell biology. 2008;18(9):421–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.FoxO and stress responses in the cnidarian Hydra vulgaris. Bridge Diane, Theofiles Alexander G, Holler Rebecca L, Marcinkevicius Emily, Steele Robert E, Martínez Daniel E. PloS one. 2010;5(7):e11686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast. Barbet N C, Schneider U, Helliwell S B, Stansfield I, Tuite M F, Hall M N. Molecular biology of the cell. 1996;7(1):25–42. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex. Brown E J, Albers M W, Shin T B, Ichikawa K, Keith C T, Lane W S, Schreiber S L. Nature. 1994;369(6483):756–8. doi: 10.1038/369756a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Pan Guangjin, Thomson James A. Cell research. 2007;17(1):42–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling. Paling Nicholas R D, Wheadon Helen, Bone Heather K, Welham Melanie J. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279(46):48063–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406467200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Activation of Akt signaling is sufficient to maintain pluripotency in mouse and primate embryonic stem cells. Watanabe S, Umehara H, Murayama K, Okabe M, Kimura T, Nakano T. Oncogene. 2006;25(19):2697–707. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Regulation of Nanog expression by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling in murine embryonic stem cells. Storm Mike P, Bone Heather K, Beck Craig G, Bourillot Pierre-Yves, Schreiber Valerie, Damiano Teresa, Nelson Adam, Savatier Pierre, Welham Melanie J. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(9):6265–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610906200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Niwa Hitoshi, Ogawa Kazuya, Shimosato Daisuke, Adachi Kenjiro. Nature. 2009;460(7251):118–22. doi: 10.1038/nature08113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Silva Jose, Nichols Jennifer, Theunissen Thorold W, Guo Ge, van Oosten Anouk L, Barrandon Ornella, Wray Jason, Yamanaka Shinya, Chambers Ian, Smith Austin. Cell. 2009;138(4):722–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Phosphorylation of Sox2 cooperates in reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells. Jeong Chul-Ho, Cho Yong-Yeon, Kim Myoung-Ok, Kim Sung-Hyun, Cho Eun-Jin, Lee Sung-Young, Jeon Young-Jin, Lee Kun Yeong, Yao Ke, Keum Young-Sam, Bode Ann M, Dong Zigang. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2010;28(12):2141–50. doi: 10.1002/stem.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stem cells and early lineage development. Rossant Janet. Cell. 2008;132(4):527–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Activin/Nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. Vallier Ludovic, Alexander Morgan, Pedersen Roger A. Journal of cell science. 2005;118(Pt 19):4495–509. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Activin a efficiently specifies definitive endoderm from human embryonic stem cells only when phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling is suppressed. McLean Amanda B, D'Amour Kevin A, Jones Karen L, Krishnamoorthy Malini, Kulik Michael J, Reynolds David M, Sheppard Alan M, Liu Huiqing, Xu Ying, Baetge Emmanuel E, Dalton Stephen. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2007;25(1):29–38. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Signaling network crosstalk in human pluripotent cells: a Smad2/3-regulated switch that controls the balance between self-renewal and differentiation. Singh Amar M, Reynolds David, Cliff Timothy, Ohtsuka Satoshi, Mattheyses Alexa L, Sun Yuhua, Menendez Laura, Kulik Michael, Dalton Stephen. Cell stem cell. 2012;10(3):312–26. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mitochondrial bioenergetic function and metabolic plasticity in stem cell differentiation and cellular reprogramming. Chen Chien-Tsun, Hsu Shu-Han, Wei Yau-Huei. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2012;1820(5):571–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.FOXO1 is an essential regulator of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Zhang Xin, Yalcin Safak, Lee Dung-Fang, Yeh Tsung-Yin J, Lee Seung-Min, Su Jie, Mungamuri Sathish Kumar, Rimmelé Pauline, Kennedy Marion, Sellers Rani, Landthaler Markus, Tuschl Thomas, Chi Nai-Wen, Lemischka Ihor, Keller Gordon, Ghaffari Saghi. Nature cell biology. 2011;13(9):1092–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.PTEN maintains haematopoietic stem cells and acts in lineage choice and leukaemia prevention. Zhang Jiwang, Grindley Justin C, Yin Tong, Jayasinghe Sachintha, He Xi C, Ross Jason T, Haug Jeffrey S, Rupp Dawn, Porter-Westpfahl Kimberly S, Wiedemann Leanne M, Wu Hong, Li Linheng. Nature. 2006;441(7092):518–22. doi: 10.1038/nature04747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Coexistence of Quiescent and Active Adult Stem Cells in Mammals. Li L., Clevers H. Science. 2010;327(5965):542-545. doi: 10.1126/science.1180794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tracking adult stem cells. Snippert Hugo J, Clevers Hans. EMBO reports. 2011;12(2):113–22. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Distribution of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow according to regional hypoxia. Parmar Kalindi, Mauch Peter, Vergilio Jo-Anne, Sackstein Robert, Down Julian D. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104(13):5431–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701152104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Very low O2 concentration (0.1%) favors G0 return of dividing CD34+ cells. Hermitte Francis, Brunet de la Grange Philippe, Belloc Francis, Praloran Vincent, Ivanovic Zoran. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2006;24(1):65–73. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Acquisition of G₀ state by CD34-positive cord blood cells after bone marrow transplantation. Shima Haruko, Takubo Keiyo, Tago Naoko, Iwasaki Hiroko, Arai Fumio, Takahashi Takao, Suda Toshio. Experimental hematology. 2010;38(12):1231–40. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Metabolic regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the hypoxic niche. Suda Toshio, Takubo Keiyo, Semenza Gregg L. Cell stem cell. 2011;9(4):298–310. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.A low level of reactive oxygen species selects for primitive hematopoietic stem cells that may reside in the low-oxygenic niche. Jang Yoon-Young, Sharkis Saul J. Blood. 2007;110(8):3056–63. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-087759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Reactive oxygen species prime Drosophila haematopoietic progenitors for differentiation. Owusu-Ansah Edward, Banerjee Utpal. Nature. 2009;461(7263):537–41. doi: 10.1038/nature08313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Metabolic plasticity and hematopoietic stem cell biology. Hsu Peter, Qu Cheng-Kui. Current opinion in hematology. 2013;20(4):289–94. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e328360ab4d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mechanistic / mammalian target protein of rapamycin signaling in hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia. Hirao Atsushi, Hoshii Takayuki. Cancer science. 2013;104(8):977–82. doi: 10.1111/cas.12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.The PI3K/PKB signaling module as key regulator of hematopoiesis: implications for therapeutic strategies in leukemia. Polak Roel, Buitenhuis Miranda. Blood. 2012;119(4):911–23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-366203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.FoxO is a critical regulator of stem cell maintenance in immortal Hydra. Boehm Anna-Marei, Khalturin Konstantin, Anton-Erxleben Friederike, Hemmrich Georg, Klostermeier Ulrich C, Lopez-Quintero Javier A, Oberg Hans-Heinrich, Puchert Malte, Rosenstiel Philip, Wittlieb Jörg, Bosch Thomas C G. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(48):19697–702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209714109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Foxo3 is essential for the regulation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated and oxidative stress-mediated homeostasis of hematopoietic stem cells. Yalcin Safak, Zhang Xin, Luciano Julia P, Mungamuri Sathish Kumar, Marinkovic Dragan, Vercherat Cécile, Sarkar Abby, Grisotto Marcos, Taneja Reshma, Ghaffari Saghi. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(37):25692–705. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800517200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.FoxOs cooperatively regulate diverse pathways governing neural stem cell homeostasis. Paik Ji-hye, Ding Zhihu, Narurkar Rujuta, Ramkissoon Shakti, Muller Florian, Kamoun Walid S, Chae Sung-Suk, Zheng Hongwu, Ying Haoqiang, Mahoney Jed, Hiller David, Jiang Shan, Protopopov Alexei, Wong Wing H, Chin Lynda, Ligon Keith L, DePinho Ronald A. Cell stem cell. 2009;5(5):540–53. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lkb1 regulates quiescence and metabolic homeostasis of haematopoietic stem cells. Gan Boyi, Hu Jian, Jiang Shan, Liu Yingchun, Sahin Ergün, Zhuang Li, Fletcher-Sananikone Eliot, Colla Simona, Wang Y Alan, Chin Lynda, Depinho Ronald A. Nature. 2010;468(7324):701–4. doi: 10.1038/nature09595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.TSC-mTOR maintains quiescence and function of hematopoietic stem cells by repressing mitochondrial biogenesis and reactive oxygen species. Chen Chong, Liu Yu, Liu Runhua, Ikenoue Tsuneo, Guan Kun-Liang, Liu Yang, Zheng Pan. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2008;205(10):2397–408. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Intrinsic and extrinsic control of haematopoietic stem-cell self-renewal. Zon Leonard I. Nature. 2008;453(7193):306–13. doi: 10.1038/nature07038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Constitutively active AKT depletes hematopoietic stem cells and induces leukemia in mice. Kharas Michael G, Okabe Rachel, Ganis Jared J, Gozo Maricel, Khandan Tulasi, Paktinat Mahnaz, Gilliland D Gary, Gritsman Kira. Blood. 2010;115(7):1406–15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.AKT1 and AKT2 maintain hematopoietic stem cell function by regulating reactive oxygen species. Juntilla Marisa M, Patil Vineet D, Calamito Marco, Joshi Rohan P, Birnbaum Morris J, Koretzky Gary A. Blood. 2010;115(20):4030–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Phosphorylation of GATA2 by Akt increases adipose tissue differentiation and reduces adipose tissue-related inflammation: a novel pathway linking obesity to atherosclerosis. Menghini Rossella, Marchetti Valentina, Cardellini Marina, Hribal Marta L, Mauriello Alessandro, Lauro Davide, Sbraccia Paolo, Lauro Renato, Federici Massimo. Circulation. 2005;111(15):1946–53. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000161814.02942.B2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.PI3K-Akt-mTORC1-S6K1/2 axis controls Th17 differentiation by regulating Gfi1 expression and nuclear translocation of RORγ. Kurebayashi Yutaka, Nagai Shigenori, Ikejiri Ai, Ohtani Masashi, Ichiyama Kenji, Baba Yukiko, Yamada Taketo, Egami Shohei, Hoshii Takayuki, Hirao Atsushi, Matsuda Satoshi, Koyasu Shigeo. Cell reports. 2012;1(4):360–73. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Park In-kyung, Qian Dalong, Kiel Mark, Becker Michael W, Pihalja Michael, Weissman Irving L, Morrison Sean J, Clarke Michael F. Nature. 2003;423(6937):302–5. doi: 10.1038/nature01587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Molofsky Anna V, Pardal Ricardo, Iwashita Toshihide, Park In-Kyung, Clarke Michael F, Morrison Sean J. Nature. 2003;425(6961):962–7. doi: 10.1038/nature02060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Akt-mediated phosphorylation of EZH2 suppresses methylation of lysine 27 in histone H3. Cha Tai-Lung, Zhou Binhua P, Xia Weiya, Wu Yadi, Yang Cheng-Chieh, Chen Chun-Te, Ping Bo, Otte Arie P, Hung Mien-Chie. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2005;310(5746):306–10. doi: 10.1126/science.1118947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.mTOR complex 1 plays critical roles in hematopoiesis and Pten-loss-evoked leukemogenesis. Kalaitzidis Demetrios, Sykes Stephen M, Wang Zhu, Punt Natalie, Tang Yuefeng, Ragu Christine, Sinha Amit U, Lane Steven W, Souza Amanda L, Clish Clary B, Anastasiou Dimitrios, Gilliland D Gary, Scadden David T, Guertin David A, Armstrong Scott A. Cell stem cell. 2012;11(3):429–39. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Temporal changes in PTEN and mTORC2 regulation of hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and leukemia suppression. Magee Jeffrey A, Ikenoue Tsuneo, Nakada Daisuke, Lee Jae Y, Guan Kun-Liang, Morrison Sean J. Cell stem cell. 2012;11(3):415–28. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.FoxOs Inhibit mTORC1 and Activate Akt by Inducing the Expression of Sestrin3 and Rictor. Chen CC, Jeon SM, Bhaskar PT. Dev Cell. 2010;18(4):592–604. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Interplay between FOXO, TOR, and Akt. Hay N. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813(11):1965–1970. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Corneal epithelial wound healing in partial limbal deficiency. Chen J J, Tseng S C. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1990;31(7):1301–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cotsarelis G, Cheng S Z, Dong G, Sun T T, Lavker R M. Cell. 1989;57(2):201–9. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90958-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Kenyon K R, Tseng S C. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(5):709–22; discussion 722. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32833-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P, Lambiase A, Bonini S, Rama P, De Luca M. The Journal of cell biology. 1999;145(4):769–82. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.4.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Epithelial stem cells in corneal regeneration and epidermal gene therapy. Pellegrini G, Rama P, Mavilio F, De Luca M. The Journal of pathology. 2009;217(2):217–28. doi: 10.1002/path.2441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. Rama Paolo, Matuska Stanislav, Paganoni Giorgio, Spinelli Alessandra, De Luca Michele, Pellegrini Graziella. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;363(2):147–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Location of corneal epithelial stem cells. Sun Tung-Tien, Tseng Scheffer C, Lavker Robert M. Nature. 2010;463(7284):E10–1; discussion E11. doi: 10.1038/nature08805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Pellegrini G, Traverso C E, Franzi A T, Zingirian M, Cancedda R, De Luca M. Lancet (London, England) 1997;349(9057):990–3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)11188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication. Barrandon Y, Green H. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1987;84(8):2302–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Regeneration of squamous epithelia from stem cells of cultured grafts. De Luca Michele, Pellegrini Graziella, Green Howard. Regenerative medicine. 2006;1(1):45–57. doi: 10.2217/17460751.1.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.In vitro propagation of human ocular surface epithelial cells for transplantation. Lindberg K, Brown M E, Chaves H V, Kenyon K R, Rheinwald J G. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1993;34(9):2672–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Regenerative medicine: An eye to treating blindness. Ezhkova Elena, Fuchs Elaine. Nature. 2010;466(7306):567–8. doi: 10.1038/466567a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Vision from the right stem. Pellegrini Graziella, Rama Paolo, De Luca Michele. Trends in molecular medicine. 2011;17(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.C/EBPdelta regulates cell cycle and self-renewal of human limbal stem cells. Barbaro Vanessa, Testa Anna, Di Iorio Enzo, Mavilio Fulvio, Pellegrini Graziella, De Luca Michele. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;177(6):1037–49. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.In sickness and in health: Corneal epithelial stem cell biology, pathology and therapy. Notara M, Alatza A, Gilfillan J, Harris A R, Levis H J, Schrader S, Vernon A, Daniels J T. Experimental eye research. 2010;90(2):188–95. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.FIH-1/c-kit signaling: a novel contributor to corneal epithelial glycogen metabolism. Peng Han, Katsnelson Julia, Yang Wending, Brown Melissa A, Lavker Robert M. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2013;54(4):2781–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.The emerging multiple roles of nuclear Akt. Martelli Alberto M, Tabellini Giovanna, Bressanin Daniela, Ognibene Andrea, Goto Kaoru, Cocco Lucio, Evangelisti Camilla. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2012;1823(12):2168–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.p63 Is essential for the proliferative potential of stem cells in stratified epithelia. Senoo Makoto, Pinto Filipa, Crum Christopher P, McKeon Frank. Cell. 2007;129(3):523–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Delta Np63 alpha expression is regulated by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Barbieri Christopher E, Barton Christopher E, Pietenpol Jennifer A. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278(51):51408–14. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309943200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Insulin/IGF-1 controls epidermal morphogenesis via regulation of FoxO-mediated p63 inhibition. Günschmann Christian, Stachelscheid Heike, Akyüz Mehmet Deniz, Schmitz Annika, Missero Caterina, Brüning Jens C, Niessen Carien M. Developmental cell. 2013;26(2):176–87. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Discoveries are provided here courtesy of Applied Systems

RESOURCES