Skip to main content
Journal of Insect Science logoLink to Journal of Insect Science
. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):2. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iez126

Flight Performance of Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Under Different Biotic and Abiotic Conditions

Jiang-Long Guo 1,2, Xiao-Kang Li 2, Xiu-Jing Shen 2, Meng-Lun Wang 2, Kong-Ming Wu 2,
Editor: Konrad Fiedler
PMCID: PMC6941620  PMID: 31899494

Abstract

Mamestra brassicae L. is an important, regionally migratory pest of vegetable crops in Europe and Asia. Its migratory activity contributes significantly to population outbreaks, causing severe crop yield losses. Because an in-depth understanding of flight performance is key to revealing migratory patterns, here we used a computer-linked flight mill and stroboscope to study the flight ability and wingbeat frequency (WBF) of M. brassicae in relation to sex, age, temperature, and relative humidity (RH). The results showed that age significantly affected the flight ability and WBF of M. brassicae, and 3-d-old individuals performed the strongest performance (total flight distance: 45.6 ± 2.5 km; total flight duration: 9.3 ± 0.3 h; WBF: 44.0 ± 0.5 Hz at 24°C and 75% RH). The age for optimal flight was considered to be 2–3 d old. Temperature and RH also significantly affected flight ability and WBF; flight was optimal from 23°C to 25°C and 64–75% RH. Because M. brassicae thus has great potential to undertake long-distance migration, better knowledge of its flight behavior and migration will help establish a pest forecasting and early-warning system.

Keywords: Mamestra brassicae, flight mill, flight ability, stroboscope, wingbeat frequency


Migration, as an adaptive life-history strategy for survival and reproduction, allows insects to avoid adverse environmental conditions and exploit temporary or patchy habitats, promoting population spread and gene flow (Dingle and Drake 2007, Chapman et al. 2011, Nagoshi et al. 2017, Cao and Wu 2019). Every year, numerous insects belonging to various taxonomic groups (e.g., Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, Hemiptera) migrate aerially by day or night on a continental scale (Chapman and Drake 2010, Hobson et al. 2012, Chapman et al. 2015), which has a major impact on ecosystem function (Bauer and Hoye 2014). The migration of lepidopteran agricultural pests such as Mythimna separata (Walker), Spodoptera exigua (Hübner), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith), is especially important and has led to severe yield losses (Jiang et al. 2011, Zheng et al. 2011, Stokstad 2017). Because the frequent use of insecticides to control these pests has negative side effects such as insect resistance and toxic residues (Cartea et al. 2014, Calvo-Agudo et al. 2019), increasing our knowledge of pest migration is of particular importance for forecasting and early-warning systems and integrated pest management (IPM).

Flight mills, tools that can keep a variety of insects flying continuously, are convenient for estimating insect relative migratory performance in the laboratory (Taylor et al. 2010, Liu et al. 2011, Ávalos et al. 2014, Attisano et al. 2015) and measuring flight variables (e.g., distance, duration, speed) within a set period and the effects of age, sex, or temperature on an insect’s flight ability (Attisano et al. 2015; Fu et al. 2017a,b; Minter et al. 2018). Since 1950s, tethered flight mills have been extensively applied to evaluate flight performance of multiple migratory moth species, such as Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) (Sappington and Showers 1991), Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Armes and Cooter 1991), Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Murata and Tojo 2004), S. exigua (Han et al. 2008), and Ctenoplusia agnata (Staudinger) (Fu et al. 2017b).

Wingbeat frequency is another major variable that is related to the aerodynamic analyses of insect flight (Altshuler et al. 2005). Because insects depend on wing beats to maintain flight during migration (e.g., ascending to cruise altitude) (Huang et al. 2013), wingbeat frequency (WBF) may prove useful for evaluating relative flight performance of an insect.

Mamestra brassicae L. is an important pest of vegetable crops and mainly distributed in a geographic belt from 30°N to about 70°N in Europe and Asia (Turnock and Carl 1995, Shi et al. 2005, Wu et al. 2015). In China, M. brassicae usually undergoes one to four generations each year depending on the latitude, e.g., it may have three to four generations in Chongqing (28°N-32°N) and two generations in Heilongjiang Province (43°N-53°N) (Wu et al. 2015). This pest is mainly present from spring to autumn (May to October) and overwinters as pupa in the soil. Mamestra brassicae larvae are polyphagous (of more than 70 host plant species of 22 families), preferring Brassicaceae and Chenopodiaceae (Popova 1993, Rojas et al. 2000) and damaging leaves by feeding (Cartea et al. 2014). By using a searchlight trap to monitor migratory insects on a small island, in the center of the Bohai Strait in northern China, Wu et al. (2015) for the first time confirmed that M. brassicae is a migratory species and annually migrates over long distances in northeastern China. Its migration behavior contributes significantly to intermittent population outbreaks, which cause severe damage and yield losses of vegetables each year and makes timely control of this pest difficult (Wu et al. 2015). Migratory insects usually are strong fliers, and an in-depth understanding of flight behavior is critical to revealing their migratory pattern (Sappington and Showers 1991, Fu et al. 2017a,b).

We thus used computer-linked flight mills and a stroboscope to study the effect of biotic (age, sex) and abiotic factors (temperature, relative humidity) on the flight ability and WBF of M. brassicae. This work further strengthens our understanding of the flight and migration behavior of M. brassicae and will contribute to the timely development of an effective regional forecasting and management protocol.

Materials and Methods

Insect Culture

Mamestra brassicae moths were collected from April to May at Beihuang Island, Shandong Province, China (38°23′N, 120°55′E) and used to establish a laboratory culture in an artificial climate incubator at 24 ± 1°C, 75 ± 5% relative humidity (RH), and 16 h:8 h (L: D) photoperiod. First to fifth instar larvae were reared on an artificial diet in a plastic petri dish (high × diameter = 2.5 × 10 cm), then mature larvae were transferred to a plastic box (length × width × height = 20.5 × 15.5 × 8.5 cm) filled with sterile soil until pupation. Pupae were removed from the soil and sexed (Zhao et al. 2011). To determine the age of unmated moths, male and female pupae were placed separately in plastic buckets (height × diameter = 15 × 11 cm) and checked daily for emergence. Moths were provided with 5% (vol: vol) honey solution via cotton wicks as supplemental food every day.

Flight Mill and Tethered Flight

Flight variables of the moths were tested using a 24-channel, tethered flight system (Jiaduo Industry & Trade Co., Ltd, Hebi, China), which mainly consisted of a computer, flight mills, and acquisition system, similar to the apparatus described by Beerwinkle et al. (1995). Before the test, each moth specimen was lightly anesthetized for 10–20 s in a glass bottle with a cotton wick soaked with ethyl acetate at the bottom. The moths were then attached by the dorsum at the junction between the metathorax and abdomen to the end of the flight mill arm (length × diameter = 30 × 0.07 cm), with 502 quick-drying glue (M&G Chenguang Stationery Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). The other end of the arm was wrapped in tin foil until the mill was balanced. The flight mill was installed in a completely dark room. The temperature and humidity inside the room could be adjusted to meet test requirements.

The time of flight initiation and cessation and the number of mill revolutions every 5 s were recorded. Any flight bout that stopped for >1 min was considered to have ended. Based on these raw data, various variables such as total flight distance and duration could be calculated to characterize the flight potential of M. brassicae. Because a single variable, however, might fail to reveal flight differences between different treatments in insects or produce misleading results (Luo et al. 2002), we evaluated relative flight ability of M. brassicae based on six variables: total flight distance, total flight duration, mean flight speed, longest distance of one flight, longest duration of one flight, and mean flight bouts. The tethered-flight tests were started at 8:00 pm and finished at 8:00 am.

Measuring WBF

A stroboscope (Phaser-Strobe pbx, Monarch) and the method of Huang et al. (2013) was used to measure the WBF after the moth attached to the flight mill arm had acclimatized for 10 min in the test conditions in the climatic chamber. The frequency of the flashing light was adjusted from high to low. When the moth’s wings remained visually static, the data displayed on the screen of the apparatus were the WBF of moths.

Experimental Design

In the first of three assays, unmated M. brassicae males and females of different ages (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 d old) were tested for the effect of sex and age on flight ability and WBF at 24°C and 75% RH. In the second assay, according to findings obtained from the first assay, 3-d-old unmated M. brassicae males and females were tested for the effect of temperature (12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32°C) on flight ability and WBF at 75% RH. In the third assay, 3-d-old unmated M. brassicae males and females were tested for the effect of RH (30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 100%) on flight ability and WBF at 24°C. For each treatment, moths that died or escaped during the test were excluded, and a minimum of 25 individuals were tested.

Data Analyses

Differences in flight ability and WBF between males and females of a given age were tested for significance using Student’s t-test. The effect of age, temperature, and RH on flight ability and WBF of M. brassicae was analyzed for significant differences using a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test. To check assumptions of normality and homogeneity for parametric analysis, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Levene’s test were used before analyses, and if the assumptions were not met, flight data were log-transformed or ranked. To find the optimum age, temperature or RH for flight, a nonlinear model (Gaussian function) y=DB2πe(xA)22B2 or y=SDB2πe(xA)22B2was used to describe the relationship between flight variables (e.g., total flight distance, mean flight speed) and key variables: age, temperature and RH. In the model, y represents a flight variable, x represents a key variable, and S, D, A, and B are constants. Because WBF did not vary distinctly in relation to the above variables, WBF data were excluded from the nonlinear regression analysis. All data procedures were executed with SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Effect of Sex and Age on Flight Ability and WBF

Using the results of the 12-h tethered flight and WBF experiments, we compared flight performance between M. brassicae males and females. Except for the total flight duration in 1-d-old individuals, there were no significant differences in flight variables between males and females at any given age (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Mean (±SE) flight performance variables for 1- to 9-d-old male and female M. brassicae at 24°C and 75% RH. An asterisk above the bars indicates a significant difference between males and females; ns indicates no significant difference was found between males and females at the 5% level of significance in Student’s t-test. (A) Total flight distance. (B) Mean flight speed. (C) Total flight duration. (D) Longest distance of one flight. (E) Longest duration of one flight. (F) No. of flight. (G) Wingbeat frequency.

Age significantly affected all flight variables (Table 1). With the exception of the number of flight bouts (which tended to increase with aging), flight variables (e.g., total flight distance, duration, WBF) first increased and then decreased from 1 to 9 d of age, with the highest values in 3-d-old individuals (e.g., total flight distance: 45.6 ± 2.5 km; total flight duration: 9.3 ± 0.3; WBF: 44.0 ± 0.5 Hz at 24°C and 75% RH) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the number of flight bouts was lower in 1 to 3 d old than in 5 to 9 d old (Fig. 2F). The fitted nonlinear functions showed that maximum values for total flight distance, mean flight speed, total flight duration, longest distance of one flight, and longest duration of one flight were found at ages of 3.0, 2.9, 2.7, 2.7, and 2.3 d, respectively, and the fewest flight bouts were found for age of 2.1 d (Fig. 2A–F).

Table 1.

One-way ANOVA of flight performance variables of M. brassicae as a function of age

Source df Total flight distance Mean flight speed Total flight duration Longest distance of one flight Longest duration of one flight No. of flights WBF
F P F P F P F P F P F P F P
Age 4 43.83 <0.01 23.49 <0.01 33.59 <0.01 32.23 <0.01 26.10 <0.01 18.80 <0.01 38.61 <0.01
Error 268
Total 272

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Mean (±SE) flight performance variables as a function of age for M. brassicae at 24°C and 75% RH. Bars sharing the same letter indicate that there are no significant differences at the 5% level in Tukey’s HSD tests. The curve represents the relationship between the variable and adult age. R2 and P for the nonlinear model are shown above the curve for each variable; A = optimal age for flight predicted by the model. (A) Total flight distance. (B) Mean flight speed. (C) Total flight duration. (D) Longest distance of one flight. (E) Longest duration of one flight. (F) No. of flight. (G) Wingbeat frequency.

Effect of Temperature on Flight Ability and WBF

For 3-d-old M. brassicae moths at 75% RH, the one-way ANOVA revealed that temperature significantly affected all flight variables (Table 2). As temperature increased, for all flight variables except the number of flight bouts, values first increased and then decreased, and values were higher at 20–28°C than at 12, 16, or 32°C, with the highest values at 24°C (Fig. 3A–E,G). However, there were fewer flight bouts at 20–28°C than at the other temperatures (Fig. 3F). The fitted nonlinear functions showed that maximum values for total flight distance, mean flight speed, total flight duration, longest distance of one flight, and longest duration of one flight were found at temperatures of 24.0, 24.4, 23.6, 23.8, and 23.7°C, respectively, and the fewest flight bouts occurred at 24.0°C (Fig. 3A–F).

Table 2.

One-way ANOVA of flight performance variables of M. brassicae as a function of temperature

Source df Total flight distance Mean flight speed Total flight duration Longest distance of one flight Longest duration of one flight No. of flights WBF
F P F P F P F P F P F P F P
Temperature 5 59.67 <0.01 21.62 <0.01 60.12 <0.01 30.24 <0.01 19.74 <0.01 10.30 <0.01 188.91 <0.01
Error 323
Total 328

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Means ± SE for flight performance as a function of temperature for 3-d-old M. brassicae at 75% RH. Bars sharing the same letter indicate that there are no significant differences at the 5% level in Tukey’s HSD tests. The curve represents the relationship between the variable and adult temperature. R2 and P for the nonlinear model are shown above the curve for each variable; A = optimal temperature for flight predicted by the model. (A) Total flight distance. (B) Mean flight speed. (C) Total flight duration. (D) Longest distance of one flight. (E) Longest duration of one flight. (F) No. of flight. (G) Wingbeat frequency.

Effect of RH on Flight Ability and WBF

For 3-d-old moths at 24°C, the one-way ANOVA revealed that RH significantly affected all flight variables (Table 3). More specifically, as the RH increased, values for all parameters except for the number of flight bouts first increased and then decreased. M. brassicae moths had relatively higher values for flight variables at 60–75% RH than at other RH levels, with the highest values at 75% RH (Fig. 4A–E). The value for the number of flight bouts was fewest at 75% RH (Fig. 4F). Furthermore, the WBF was higher at relatively low RH (30–75%) than at high RH (90–100%) (Fig. 4G). The fitted nonlinear functions showed that maximum values for total flight distance, mean flight speed, total flight duration, longest distance of one flight, and longest duration of one flight were found at RH 72.0, 64.0, 75.0, 71.2, and 71.1%, respectively, and the fewest flight bouts occurred at 71.1% RH (Fig. 4A–F).

Table 3.

One-way ANOVA analysis of flight performance variables of M. brassicae as a function of RH

Source df Total flight distance Mean flight speed Total flight duration Longest distance of one flight Longest duration of one flight No. of flights WBF
F P F P F P F P F P F P F P
RH 5 47.74 <0.01 22.31 <0.01 57.61 <0.01 43.07 <0.01 34.52 <0.01 5.35 <0.01 93.10 <0.01
Error 332
Total 337

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Means ± SE for flight performance as a function of RH for 3-d-old M. brassicae at 24°C. Bars sharing the same letter indicate that there are no significant differences at the 5% level by Tukey’s HSD tests. The curve represents the relationship between the variable and RH. R2 and P for the nonlinear model are shown above the curve for each variable; A = optimal RH for flight predicted by the model. (A) Total flight distance. (B) Mean flight speed. (C) Total flight duration. (D) Longest distance of one flight. (E) Longest duration of one flight. (F) No. of flight. (G) Wingbeat frequency.

Discussion

Many empirical studies of insects have shown that flight performance is influenced by various biotic and abiotic factors (Bowler and Benton 2005; Sarvary et al. 2008; Huang et al. 2013; Fu et al. 2017a,b; Villarreal et al. 2017; Minter et al. 2018; Qin et al. 2018). Without exception, we similarly found in this study that age, temperature, and RH significantly affected flight ability and WBF of M. brassicae.

To date, migratory noctuids such as A. ipsilon (Sappington and Showers 1991), M. separata (Luo et al. 1999), S. litura (Tu et al. 2010), Macdunnoughia crassisigna Warren (Fu et al. 2017a), and C. agnata (Fu et al. 2017b) have shown strong flight ability in tethered flight experiments. Due to the inherent limitations of tethered flight, however, results obtained from flight mills cannot reflect flight performance of a given insect species in natural conditions (Armes and Cooter 1991). However, relative flight performance can reasonably be evaluated using flight mills (Taylor et al. 2010). In our study, 3-d-old individuals of M. brassicae flew, respectively, a mean distance of 45.6 ± 2.5 km, with a mean speed of 4.8 ± 0.2 km/h in a 12-h assay. The flight performance of M. brassicae is similar to that of other migratory insects such as H. armigera (Wu and Guo 1996), S. litura (Tu et al. 2010), and was stronger than that of Mythimna loreyi (Qin et al. 2018). In addition, during a 12-yr monitoring period, >30,000 M. brassicae specimens were captured on Beihuang Island, demonstrating that this species migrates across the Bohai Strait (Wu et al. 2015). Therefore, all these results suggest that M. brassicae has strong potential for long-distance flight.

Age-dependent variation in flight performance has been documented for a wide range of insect species, such as H. armigera (Coombs 1997, Shi et al. 2013), Adelphocoris suturalis Jakovlew (Lu et al. 2009), Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Huang et al. 2013), C. agnata (Fu et al. 2017b), Mythimna loreyi Walker (Qin et al. 2018). Generally speaking, the general trend is that flight performance of a migratory insect increases gradually after adult emergence and peaks at a relatively early stage of adult life and then declines with age (Dingle 1985, Coombs 1997). In the present study, both sexes of M. brassicae also showed similar age-related changes in flight performance, with the strongest flight in 3-d olds. The variation in flight performance may be caused by internal species-specific temporal changes in physiology (Farnworth 1972, Saito 2000). Insect flight is closely related to the development of flight muscles (Heinrich 1971, Marden 2000, Cheng et al. 2016). Flight performance likely increases in early adults owing to increased mass of the flight muscles (Lorenz 2007). However, as age continues to increase, juvenile hormone in the hemolymph induces or accelerates flight muscle histolysis (Borden and Slater 1968, Shiga et al. 2002), which diminishes flight performance. This flight muscle histolysis has been confirmed in insects such as M. separata (Luo 1996), Gryllus bimaculatus (Lorenz 2007), and Pieris napi (Stjernholm and Karlsson 2008). Given that M. brassicae moths had a short prereproductive phase and the flight ability of 3-d-old mated moths was lower than that of 3-d-old unmated moths (Wu et al. 2016), we speculate that migratory flights may occur at least before insects are 3 d old. Although this assumed time window for optimal migration for M. brassicae seems narrow, this species, like other migratory insects, might use fast-moving winds for rapid, comparatively long-distance migration (Chapman et al. 2016, Hu et al. 2016).

As poikilotherms, migratory insects and their flight performance can be affected by many environmental factors, especially temperature and humidity (Kroder et al. 2006, Huang et al. 2013, Minter et al. 2018). Large-scale insect migration usually occurs at a suitable temperature and humidity (Reynolds et al. 2005, Wood et al. 2009), and extreme conditions (e.g., very high temperature, low humidity) can inhibit flight performance (Liu et al. 2011, Huang et al. 2013, Fu et al. 2017a,b) as it did in our study. The optimum temperature was 23–25°C, and optimum RH was 64–75% for flight which is similar to the results for other noctuid insects such as H. armigera (Armes and Cooter 1991, Shi et al. 2013), S. litura (Tu et al. 2010), M. crassisigna (Fu et al. 2017a), and C. agnata (Fu et al. 2017b). The main reasons that unfavorable conditions (e.g., high temperature, low humidity) inhibit flight performance may be due to water loss (Farnworth 1972; Lu et al. 2007; Fu et al. 2017a,b), or because moths flying at high ambient temperature cannot dissipate the heat generated by wing muscles rapidly enough, leading to heat stress (Unwin and Corbet 1984). These findings are important for understanding the migration pattern of M. brassicae. For example, by using suitable temperature and humidity range for flight, we can estimate the flight altitude of migratory M. brassicae (many noctuids are known to fly in altitudinal layers; Feng et al. 2003, 2009; Reynolds et al. 2005; Wood et al. 2009). Knowledge of the optimal flight attitude will allow more accurate estimates of migration trajectory.

In summary, the flight mill and stroboscope, as fairly easy-to-use tools, can provide quantitative estimates of the relative flight performance of M. brassicae under various conditions. These findings can help us understand the migration of M. brassicae and develop effective forecasting and management programs. However, as mentioned above, tethered flight has limitations (Armes and Cooter 1991, Beerwinkle et al. 1995, Taylor et al. 2010, Minter et al. 2018), and caution is needed when extrapolating results from laboratory flight-mill experiments. For insights into the full migratory cycle of M. brassicae, future studies should integrate the flight mill and stroboscope with other techniques such as field sampling and entomological radar, trajectory, and population genetics analyses to thoroughly research the migratory behavior of this species (Minter et al. 2018).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Meng-Yue Yang, Jing-Jing Zhao from the College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, for their contribution in rearing larvae. This study was funded by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (31621064 and 31727901).

References Cited

  1. Altshuler D. L., Dickson W. B., Vance J. T., Roberts S. P., and Dickinson M. H.. . 2005. Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 18213–18218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armes N. J., and Cooter R. J.. . 1991. Effects of age and mated status on flight potential of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Physiol. Entomol. 16: 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  3. Attisano A., Murphy J. T., Vickers A., and Moore P.. . 2015. A simple flight mill for the study of tethered flight in insects. J. Vis. Exp. 106: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ávalos J. A., Martí-Campoy A., and Soto A.. . 2014. Study of the flying ability of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Dryopthoridae) adults using a computerized flight mill. B. Entomol. Res. 104: 462–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer S., and Hoye B. J.. . 2014. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science. 344: 1242552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beerwinkle K. R., Lopez J. D., Cheng D., Lingren P. D., and Meola R. W.. . 1995. Flight potential of feral Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) males measured with a 32-channel, computer-monitored, flight-mill system. Environ. Entomol. 24: 1122–1130. [Google Scholar]
  7. Borden J. H., and Slater C. E.. . 1968. Induction of flight muscle degeneration by synthetic juvenile hormone in Ips confusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 61: 366–368. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowler D. E., and Benton T. G.. . 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80: 205–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calvo-Agudo M., González-Cabrera J., Picó Y., Calatayud-Vernich P., Urbaneja A., Dicke M., and Tena A.. . 2019. Neonicotinoids in excretion product of phloem-feeding insects kill beneficial insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116: 16817–16822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao L. Z., and Wu K. M.. . 2019. Genetic diversity and demographic history of globe skimmers (Odonata: Libellulidae) in China based on microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Sci. Rep. 9: 8619–8626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cartea M. E., Soengas P., Sotelo T., and Velasco P.. . 2014. Determining the host-plant resistance mechanisms for Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) pest in cabbage. Ann. Appl. Biol. 164: 270–285. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chapman J. W., and Drake V. A.. . 2010. Insect migration, pp. 161–166. InBreed M. D. and Moore J. (eds.), Encyclopedia of animal behavior. Academic Press, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chapman J. W., Drake V. A., and Reynolds D. R.. . 2011. Recent insights from radar studies of insect flight. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56: 337–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chapman J. W., Nilsson C., Lim K. S., Bäckman J., Reynolds D. R., and Alerstam T.. . 2016. Adaptive strategies in nocturnally migrating insects and songbirds: contrasting responses to wind. J. Anim. Ecol. 85: 115–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chapman J. W., Reynolds D. R., and Wilson K.. . 2015. Long-range seasonal migration in insects: mechanisms, evolutionary drivers and ecological consequences. Ecol. Lett. 18: 287–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng Y. X., Luo L. Z., Sappington T. W., Jiang X. F., Zhang L., and Frolov A. N.. . 2016. Onset of oviposition triggers abrupt reduction in migratory flight behavior and flight muscle in the female beet webworm, Loxostege sticticalis. PLoS One 11: 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Coombs M. 1997. Tethered-flight and age-related reproductive performance of Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) and H. armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust. J. Zool. 45: 409–422. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dingle H. 1985. Migration, pp. 375–415. InKerkut G. A. and Gilbert L. I. (eds.), Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dingle H., and Drake V. A.. . 2007. What is migration? BioScience 57: 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  20. Farnworth E. G. 1972. Effects of ambient temperature, humidity, and age on wing-beat frequency of Periplaneta species. J. Insect. Physiol. 18: 827–839. [Google Scholar]
  21. Feng H. Q., Wu K. M., Cheng D. F., and Guo Y. Y.. . 2003. Radar observations of the autumn migration of the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and other moths in northern China. B. Entomol. Res. 93: 115–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Feng H. Q., Wu X. F., Wu B., and Wu K. M.. . 2009. Seasonal migration of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) over the Bohai sea. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 95–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fu X. W., Chang H., He L. M., Zhao S. Y., and Wu K. M.. . 2017a. Flight performance of Macdunnoughia crassisigna (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). B. Entomol. Res. 107: 715–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu X. W., Zhao S. Y., Li C., Wu X., Guo J. L., and Wu K. M.. . 2017b. Flight performance of Ctenoplusia agnata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 110: 986–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Han L. Z., Gu H. N., Zhai B. P., and Zhang X. I.. . 2008. Reproduction-flight relationship in the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 37: 374–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Heinrich B. 1971. Temperature regulation of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta I. Flight energetics and body temperature during free and tethered flight. J. Exp. Biol. 54: 141–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hobson K. A., Anderson R. C., Soto D. X., and Wassenaar L. I.. . 2012. Isotopic evidence that dragonflies (Pantala flavescens) migrating through the Maldives come from the northern Indian subcontinent. Plos One. 7: e52594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu G., Reynolds D. R., Reynolds A., and Chapman J. W.. . 2016. Wind-related orientation patterns in diurnal, crepuscular and nocturnal high-altitude insect migrants. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10: 32–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang J. C., Zhang G. A., and Wang Y. M.. . 2013. Effects of age, ambient temperature and reproductive status on wing beat frequency of the rice leafroller Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 48: 499–505. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiang X. F., Luo L. Z., Zhang L., Sappington T. W., and Hu Y.. . 2011. Regulation of migration in Mythimna separata (Walker) in China: a review integrating environmental, physiological, hormonal, genetic, and molecular factors. Environ. Entomol. 40: 516–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kroder S., Samietz J., and Dorn S.. . 2006. Effect of ambient temperature on mechanosensory host location in two parasitic wasps of different climatic origin. Physiol. Entomol. 31: 299–305. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu Z. F., Mcneil J. N., and Wu K. M.. . 2011. Flight mill performance of the Lacewing Chrysoperla sinica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) as a function of age, temperature, and relative humidity. J. Econ. Entomol. 104: 94–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lorenz M. W. 2007. Oogenesis-flight syndrome in crickets: age-dependent egg production, flight performance, and biochemical composition of the flight muscles in adult female Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Insect. Physiol. 53: 819–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lu Y. H., Wu K. M., and Guo Y. Y.. . 2007. Flight potential of Lygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür) (Heteroptera: Miridae). Environ. Entomol. 36: 1007–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu Y. H., Wu K. M., Wyckhuys K. A. G., and Guo Y. Y.. . 2009. Comparative flight performance of three important pest Adelphocoris species of Bt cotton in China. B. Entomol. Res. 99: 543–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Luo L. Z. 1996. An ultrastructural study on the development of flight muscle in adult oriental armyworm, Mythiman separata (Walker). Acta Entomol. Sin. 39: 366–374. [Google Scholar]
  37. Luo L. Z., Jiang X. F., Li K. B., and Hu Y.. . 1999. Influences of flight on reproduction and longevity of the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker). Acta Entomol. Sin. 42: 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  38. Luo L. Z., Johnson S. J., Hammond A. M., Lopez J. D., Geaghan J. P., Beerwinkle K. R., and Westbrook J. K.. . 2002. Determination and consideration of flight potential in a laboratory population of true armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 31: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  39. Marden J. H. 2000. Variability in the size, composition, and function of insect flight muscles. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 62: 157–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Minter M., Pearson A., Lim K., Wilson K., Chapman J. W., and Jones C. M.. . 2018. The tethered flight technique as a tool for studying life-history strategies associated with migration in insects. Ecol. Entomol. 43: 397–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Murata M., and Tojo S.. . 2004. Flight capability and fatty acid level in triacylglycerol of long-distance migratory adults of the common cutworm Spopdoptera litura. Zool. Sci. 21: 181–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nagoshi R. N., Fleischer S., Meagher R. L., Hay-Roe M., Khan A., Murúa M. G., Silvie P., Vergara C., and Westbrook J.. . 2017. Fall armyworm migration across the Lesser Antilles and the potential for genetic exchanges between North and South American populations. PLoS One. 12: e0171743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Popova T. 1993. A study of antibiotic effects on cabbage cultivars on the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ent. Rev. 72: 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  44. Qin J. Y., Liu Y. Q., Zhang L., Cheng Y. X., Sappington T. W., and Jiang X. F.. . 2018. Effects of moth age and rearing temperature on the flight performance of the loreyi leafworm, Mythimna loreyi (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in tethered and free flight. J. Econ. Entomol. 111: 1243–1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Reynolds D. R., Chapman J. W., Edwards A. S., Smith A. D., Wood C. R., Barlow J. F., and Woiwod I. P.. . 2005. Radar studies of the vertical distribution of insects migrating over southern Britain: the influence of temperature inversions on nocturnal layer concentrations. B. Entomol. Res. 95: 259–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rojas J. C., Wyatt T. D., and Birch M. C.. . 2000. Flight an oviposition behavior toward different host plant species by the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Insect. Behav. 13: 247–254. [Google Scholar]
  47. Saito O. 2000. Flight activity changes of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), by aging and copulation as measured by flight. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 35: 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sappington T. W., and Showers W. B.. . 1991. Implications for migration of age-related variation in flight behavior of Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84: 560–565. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sarvary M. A., Bloem K. A., Bloem S., Carpenter J. E., Hight S. D., and Dorn S.. . 2008. Dial flight pattern and flight performance of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) measured on a flight mill: influence of age, gender, matting status, and body size. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 314–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shi X. Y., Feng H. Q., Li J. Q., and Liu B.. . 2013. Comparison of wingbeat frequency between oriental armyworm Mythimna separata, cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera and black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon. Plant Protect. 39: 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  51. Shi B. C., Gong Y. J., and Lu H.. . 2005. The identification and control of Mamestra brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). China Veget. 9: 56. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shiga S., Yasuyama K., Okamura N., and Yamaguchi T.. . 2002. Neural- and endocrine control of flight muscle degeneration in the adult cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Insect. Physiol. 48: 15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stjernholm F., and Karlsson B.. . 2008. Flight muscle breakdown in the green-veined white butterfly, Pieris napi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  54. Stokstad E. 2017. New crop pest takes Africa at lightning speed. Science 356: 473–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Taylor R. A. J., Bauer L. S., Poland T. M., and Windell K. N.. . 2010. Flight performance of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on a flight mill and in free flight. J. Insect. Behav. 23: 128–148. [Google Scholar]
  56. Tu Y. G., Wu K. M., Xue F. S., and Lu Y. H.. . 2010. Laboratory evaluation of flight activity of the common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insect. Sci. 17: 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  57. Turnock W. J., and Carl K. P.. . 1995. Evaluation of the Palearctic Eurithia consobrina (Diptera: Tachinidae) as a potential biocontrol agent for Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Canada. Biocontrol. Sci. Techn. 5: 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  58. Unwin D. M., and Corbet S. A.. . 1984. Wingbeat frequency, temperature and body size in bees and flies. Physiol. Entomol. 9: 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  59. Villarreal S. M., Winokur O., and Harrington L.. . 2017. The Impact of temperature and body size on fundamental flight tone variation in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): implications for acoustic lures. J. Med. Entomol. 54: 1116–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wood C. R., Reynolds D. R., Wells P. M., Barlow J. F., Woiwod I. P., and Chapman J. W.. . 2009. Flight periodicity and the vertical distribution of high-altitude moth migration over southern Britain. B. Entomol. Res. 99: 525–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wu X., Fu X., Guo J., Zhao X., and Wu K.. . 2015. Annual migration of cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), over the sea in Northern China. PLoS One. 10: e0132904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wu X., Fu X. W., Zhao X. C., and Wu K. M.. . 2016. Preliminary study of the flight capacity of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae Linnaeus. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 53: 595–603. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhao Q., Zhang Y. H., Liu H., and Cheng D. F.. . 2011. A method used for distinguishing between the sexes of Scotogramma trifolii. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 48: 1879–1881. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zheng X. L., Cong X. P., Wang X. P., and Lei C. L.. . 2011. A review of geographic distribution, overwintering and migration in Spodoptera exigua Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 13: 39–48. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Insect Science are provided here courtesy of University of Wisconsin Libraries

RESOURCES