Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019 Oct 3;18:99–102. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2019.09.014

Oxidative Stress in Early Pregnancy and the Risk of Preeclampsia

Iman M Ahmad 1, Matthew C Zimmerman 2, Tiffany A Moore 3
PMCID: PMC6941664  NIHMSID: NIHMS1064507  PMID: 31586785

Abstract

Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE), one of the most serious complications of pregnancy, is characterized by endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. The pathophysiology of the disease is still unknown; however, evidence suggests that placental and maternal oxidative stress promote the disease process. Several studies have assessed levels of oxidative stress during pregnancy, but after diagnosis of PE. However, few studies have examined oxidative stress before PE diagnosis. Thus, the present work was aimed to gain further insight into the role of oxidative stress prior to diagnosis of PE (i.e. 12–20 weeks of gestation) and to further understand and predict PE incidence.

Methods

Blood levels of superoxide (O2●−) and erythrocyte antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels were measured in 23 preeclamptic pregnant women and 91 women with normal pregnancies. We further used logistic regression of O2●− and each antioxidant level as the main predictor variable for PE risk.

Results

CAT activity, GSH, and Total glutathione (TGSH) were significantly lower with All PE pregnant groups, whereas O2●− levels were modestly, but significantly, higher in women with mild PE. Logistic regression analysis suggests increased CAT activity in pregnant women is associated with a decreased odds of being preeclamptic.

Conclusion

CAT is the only antioxidant as shown in our study to be related to the severity of the disease and may be a promising predictor for PE. Further studies are warranted to investigate the use of CAT as a novel therapeutic for PE.

Keywords: preeclampsia, early pregnancy, catalase, oxidative stress, superoxide, superoxide dismutase, glutathione

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE), a leading cause of preterm delivery and of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide [13], is more than simply gestational hypertension during pregnancy [4]. It is characterized by new, sustained hypertension and proteinuria and other adverse conditions in the second half of pregnancy [1, 5]. Despite significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology of PE, the cause of this disorder remains largely unknown. PE is proposed as a “2-stage model” [6] in which reduced placental perfusion leads to the maternal syndrome characterized by endothelial dysfunction and hypertension; however, the link between these stages is unclear. Oxidative stress, often referred to as an imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidants, increases during PE and results in increased production of lipid peroxides and ROS, such as superoxide (O2●−) [79]. Oxidative stress is a known cause of endothelial dysfunction making it a potential contributor to PE [10, 11]. Several studies have reported that markers of oxidative damage are elevated and antioxidant vitamin levels are lower in women with PE [1216]. However, many of these previous studies measured antioxidant levels in mid and late pregnancy (i.e. after PE diagnosis). As such, it is unclear if changes in oxidative stress markers are causal to or an effect of PE. Thus, the purpose of this secondary analysis was to identify biomarkers in early pregnancy which may be associated with the eventual development of PE. These findings will enhance our understanding of the role of oxidative stress in early pregnancy with the incidence of PE. Our study objectives were to: 1) identify differences between maternal levels of ROS and antioxidants between 12–20 weeks gestation in women who develop PE and those who do not; and 2) identify predictive relationships of maternal O2●−, and antioxidants measured between 12–20 weeks gestation with incidence of PE.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample collection

A prospective, longitudinal design was used to recruit 140 pregnant women between 12–20 weeks gestation from a maternal-fetal medicine practice group and a general obstetrics practice group associated with a Midwest tertiary perinatal center. The present study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Nebraska Medical Center (Protocol No. 154–14-EP and 794–15-EP), and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Further details of the original study can be found in Moore et al [17]. Demographic (age, body mass index (BMI), race, ethnicity, diabetes mellitis (DM)) and outcome (maternal PE, neonate’s gestational age at birth, neonate’s birth weight) data were collected from the electronic health records of the pregnant women after delivery. All pregnant women were followed until delivery and categorized as PE per documentation in the medical record. PE severity was diagnosed in 1 of 3 ways: (1) gestational hypertension if there was high blood pressure (BP) (systolic BP>140 Hg and/or diastolic BP>90 Hg); (2) mild PE if there was proteinuria and high BP (systolic BP>140 Hg and/or diastolic BP>90 Hg); (3) or severe PE was established by persistent high BP (systolic BP≥160 Hg or diastolic BP≥110 Hg) and proteinuria, and any of the following adverse conditions: creatinine >1.0, liver enzymes 2x normal or more, platelets <100, and symptoms such as headache, visual changes, shortness of breath, and chest pain.

2.2. Blood sampling

Blood samples were collected from all pregnant women into EDTA tubes at 12–20 weeks of gestation. Red blood cells (erythrocytes) were separated from plasma by centrifugation at 2500 × g at 4°C for 5 minutes and the plasma and erythrocytes samples were then stored at −80°C until analyzed.

2.3. O2•− measurements

O2●− was measured in whole blood using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy [18]. Briefly, thirty minutes after blood collection, whole blood was incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C with a superoxide-sensitive EPR spin probe, 1-hydroxy-3-methoxycarbonyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine (CMH), then frozen in liquid nitrogen. Oxidation of these spin probes results in the formation of stable nitroxide radicals that can be detected by EPR spectroscopy. The amplitude of the EPR spectrum is directly proportional to the concentration of O2●−. All EPR measurements were performed with a Bruker eScan EPR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten/Karlsruhe, Germany) and expressed as EPR arbitrary units (A.U.).

2.4. Antioxidants measurement

All antioxidants (i.e. superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG)) were measured in red blood cell lysate using commercially available assays [(SOD Assay Kit-WST (DOJINDO, Inc, Rockville, MD, USA), OxiSelect Catalase Activity Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), GSSG/GSH Quantification kit (DOJINDO, Inc, Rockville, MD, USA)] and per the manufacture instructions.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and parametric tests were used to describe and compare demographic and outcome variables between PE and normal pregnant groups. All biomarkers were log-transformed to account for skewed data and mean differences in each of the biomarkers between PE severity and normal pregnant groups were studied, using ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni corrections. Spearman’s correlations between oxidative stress biomarkers and PE severity were also studied. Logistic regression models for predicting the dichotomous outcome of PE/normal pregnancy was performed using log-transformed data.

3. Results

Description of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups are shown in Table 1. All PE pregnant groups did not differ from those in the normal pregnancy group in age, BMI, gestational age at sampling, baby birth weight and maternal ethnicity. All PE pregnant groups delivered approximately two weeks earlier compared to normal pregnancy group (p<0.001, Table 1). A greater proportion of the PE pregnant group were white compared to the normal pregnancy group (p=0.007, Table 1). As expected, more women with PE had diabetes compared to women with normal pregnancies (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical Characteristics of All PE and Normal Pregnancy Groups

Maternal characteristics All PE n=25 Normal pregnancy n=103 P value
Mean ± SD or n (%) Mean ± SD or n (%)
Age at delivery (years) 30.6 ± 5.85 28.6 ± 4.94 0.083
BMI 31.80 ± 10.20 28.26 ± 8.14 0.065
Gestational age at sampling (weeks) 12–20 12–20
Baby birth weight (grams) 3162.80 ± 723.96 3317.53 ± 584.78 0.261)
Baby Gestational Age 36.9 ± 2.43 38.8 ± 2.09 <0.001
Maternal Race 0.007 (Fisher’s exact)
 White 23 (92) 66 (64)
 Non-white 2 (8) 37 (36)
Maternal Ethnicity (non Hispanic) 24 (96) 90 (87) 0.227
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Status <0.001 (chi square)
 No 12 (48) 89 (86)
 DMI 4 (16) 1 (1)
 DMII 4 (16) 2I (10)
 Gestational DM 5 (20) 11 (10)

Descriptive statistics includes testing differences between All PE and normal pregnancy groups using Chi-Square tests and t-tests.

Biochemical parameters for each pregnancy group are provided in Table 2. O2●− levels were modestly, but significantly, higher in women with mild PE compared with those with gestational hypertension and in the normal pregnancy group (p< 0.05). CAT activity was significantly lower in All PE pregnant groups compared with the normal pregnancy group and were also significantly lower in women with severe PE compared with the normal pregnancy group (p<0.01). Levels of CAT activity seemed to be related to the severity of the disease. Total glutathione (TGSH) and GSH levels were significantly lower in All PE pregnant groups than in normal pregnancy group (p<0.01). However, there was no significant differences between the study groups across the severity of the disease. SOD and GSSG concentrations showed no significant differences between PE severity groups or between the All PE pregnant groups and the normal pregnancy group (p>0.05, Table 2).

Table 2:

Descriptive Statistics of Biochemical Parameters Between PE vs Normal Pregnancy Groups at 12–20 Weeks of Gestation.

PE groups
Biochemical parameters (unit) Normal pregnancy n=91 All PE n=23 Gestational hypertension n=6 Mild PE n=6 Severe PE n=11
Superoxide (O2●−) (A.U.)a 5.9 ± 0.2 5.9 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.2 6.1 ± 0.4b 5.9 ± 0.2
Catalase (CAT) (U/mL) 10.7 ± 0.9 9.9 ± 0.9c 10.2 ± 1.2 10.5 ± 0.7 9.5 ± 0.5c
Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) (U/mL) 11.4 ± 0.9 11.1 ± 0.9 11.4 ± 0.7 11.4 ± 1.2 10.7 ± 0.7
Total Glutathione (TGSH) (nmol/mL) 7.5 ± 0.4 7.2 ± 0.3c 7.1 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.3
Reduced Glutathione (GSH) (nmol/mL) 7.4 ± 0.4 7.1 ± 0.3c 7.1 ± 0.5 7.2 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.3
Oxidized Glutathione (GSSG) (nmol/mL) 3.6 ± 0.6 3.3 ± 0.8 3.2 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 1.2 3.4 ± 0.7

Values expressed as log means ±SD

a

Arbitrary Units

b

p< 0.05, vs normal and gestational hypertension

c

p<0.01, vs normal pregnancy

As shown in Table 3, changes in the antioxidant levels of CAT, TGSH and GSH were negatively correlated with the severity of PE. Although there was a slight, but significant, increase in O2●− levels in mild PE versus normal pregnancy and gestational hypertensive women (Table 2), the odds ratio, as determined by the regression model analysis for O2●− was not significant (p=0.29, Table 4). CAT was the only parameter significantly associated with a reduced risk of PE (Table 4). It is estimated that for one unit increase in the log of CAT, the odds of being preeclamptic decreases by 64% (calculated: (odds ratio (OR)-1)*100, p<0.05, Table 4).

Table 3.

Correlations Between Oxidative Stress Measures of Superoxide (O2●−), Catalase (CAT), Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), Total Glutathione (TGSH), Reduced Glutathione, and Oxidized Glutathione (GSSG) Levels and PE Severity at 12–20 Weeks Gestation.

Oxidative Stress Measurea PE Severity
O2●− (0.045, 0.637)
CAT (−0.335, 0.000)
SOD (−0.164, 0.077)
TGSH (−0.302, 0.001)
GSH (−0.299, 0.001)
GSSG (−0.101, 0.279)
a

log transformed

Note: Correlations were analyzed using Spearman’s correlations (rs, p-value). Statistically significant correlations (p<0.05) are bolded.

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Biochemical Parameters for Predicting PE.

Parametera OR 95% CI P value
O2•- 12.06 0.12–1158.58 0.29
CAT 0.36 0.17–0.76 0.01
SOD 1.22 0.64–2.32 0.56
GSH 32.06 0.00–5.5E11 0.77
a

log transformed

PE, preeclampsia; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

4. Discussion

This study demonstrates strong association between some oxidative stress parameters assessed at 12–20 weeks of gestation and PE. Higher levels of CAT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of PE. CAT is the only antioxidant known to be related to the severity of the disease. Our findings suggest that oxidative stress is a potential contributor to PE. High levels of ROS are detrimental to cells leading to oxidative damage to molecules such as lipids, proteins and DNA. However, the body is equipped with antioxidant systems to overcome the elevated levels of ROS. The non-enzymatic antioxidants includes GSH, ascorbic acid, tocopherol, carotene, uric acid, bilirubin and the enzymatic antioxidants include SOD, glutathione peroxidase, and CAT. Thus, the present work was aimed to gain further insight into the role of oxidative stress prior to diagnosis of PE (i.e. 12–20 weeks of gestation) and to further understand and predict PE incidence.

Numerous studies have assessed levels of various antioxidants during pregnancy, but after PE diagnosis [1927]. However, only a few studies have examined differences in their levels prior to diagnosis [2831], which commonly occurs after the 20th week of gestation. Among previous studies that measured antioxidants prior to the diagnosis of PE, our study is the first known study to measure CAT activity and O2●− levels in early pregnancy (i.e. 12–20 weeks of gestation). Our results suggest that oxidative stress related to a decrease in CAT activity may be implicated in early-onset PE and may accelerate the progression of the disease.

In the present study, the observed increase in O2●− levels in mild PE to that of normal pregnancy group could be associated with the severity of PE. However, our results did not show significant association between O2●− and PE severity (Table 3). Although, SOD is the first barrier and antioxidant defense against O2●− [32], maternal erythrocyte SOD activity was not significantly altered between both groups. This result is in accordance with another study that showed no changes in SOD activity at 16–20 weeks of gestation [31]. A previous study reported lower levels of serum SOD in women with PE at 10–14 and 20–24 weeks of gestation [29]. The discrepancy between our data and previous study might be due to the source of sample collection. Maternal erythrocyte CAT activity was lower in PE pregnant group at gestation age <20 weeks as compared to normal pregnancy group. The deficiency of CAT activity in women with severe PE before diagnosis may be of particular importance in understanding the pathophysiologic mechanism associated with PE, as the O2●− that is being generated continuously by numerous sources throughout the body is rapidly converted into H2O2, which if not detoxified can contribute to oxidative stress [33]. Unfortunately, we did not measure H2O2 levels in our study, however, we did measure CAT activity and GSH. Interestingly, there are fewer studies about erythrocyte CAT activities during pregnancy in women with PE after the diagnosis [3438], whereas none of the studies assessed differences in CAT activity preceding PE diagnosis.

GSH is a major intracellular antioxidant. Erythrocytes contain high concentrations of GSH accounting for almost 98% of total blood content. In addition to their detoxifying function, GSH and other thiols maintain the redox balance of cells, thereby preventing oxidative damage [39]. In present study, there was a marked reduction in antioxidant reduced GSH in PE pregnant group compared to normal pregnancy group. Our results are supported by previous studies [31, 40]. However, CAT is the only antioxidant known to be significantly related to the severity of the disease. One unit increase in the log of CAT, the odds of being preeclamptic decreases by 64%, Table 4. Together, these findings suggest an increased oxidative stress which may play a role in the pathogenesis of PE. If this finding is corroborated in future studies, CAT may be a promising antioxidant to consider in PE prevention trials.

In summary, the present study demonstrates CAT activity is inversely associated with the severity of PE and suggests a correlation between oxidative stress with initiation and progression of PE. Further, well-designed and adequately powered studies are warranted to investigate the use of CAT as a novel therapy for the improved treatment of PE.

Highlights.

  1. Higher level of CAT activity was significantly associated with a reduced risk of PE.

  2. CAT is the only antioxidant to be related to the PE severity and may be a promising predictor.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the staff and patients at Nebraska Medicine and Olson Center, Jocelyn Jones, Colton T. Roessner, and Ellen Steffensmeier.

Funding

This study was funded by NIH 1K01NR014474-01 and a University of Nebraska Medical Center’s Edna Ittner Pediatric Support grant. EPR Spectroscopy data was collected in the University of Nebraska’s EPR Spectroscopy Core, which was initially established with support from a Center of Biomedical Research Excellence grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (P30GM103335) awarded to the University of Nebraska’s Redox Biology Center.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • [1].Duley L, The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, Semin Perinatol 33(3) (2009) 130–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth, Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6) (2006) 1557–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, Young C, Skoll A, Joseph KS, Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia, Obstet Gynecol 124(4) (2014) 771–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Roberts JM Pre-eclampsia RC: more than pregnancy-induced hypertension, The Lancet 341(8858) (1993) 1447–1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].v.D.P. Steegers EA, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R, Pre-eclampsia, The Lancet 376(9741) (2010) 631–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Roberts JM HC, Is oxidative stress the link in the two-stage model of pre-eclampsia?, The Lancet 354(9181) (1999) 788–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Gupta S, Aziz N, Sekhon L, Agarwal R, Mansour G, Li J, Agarwal A, Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in preeclampsia: a systematic review, Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(11) (2009) 750–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].C.S. Hsieh TT, Lo LM, Li MJ, Yeh YL, Hung TH, The Association Between Maternal Oxidative Stress at Mid-Gestation and Subsequent Pregnancy Complications Reproductive Sciences 19(5) (2012) 505–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Madazli R, Benian A, Gumustas K, Uzun H, Ocak V, Aksu F, Lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in preeclampsia, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 85(2) (1999) 205–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Lum H, Roebuck KA, Oxidant stress and endothelial cell dysfunction, Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280(4) (2001) C719–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Hubel CA, Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 222(3) (1999) 222–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Bowen RS, Moodley J, Dutton MF, Theron AJ, Oxidative stress in pre-eclampsia, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(8) (2001) 719–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Serdar Z, Gur E, Colakoethullary M, Develioethlu O, Sarandol E, Lipid and protein oxidation and antioxidant function in women with mild and severe preeclampsia, Arch Gynecol Obstet 268(1) (2003) 19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Mikhail MS, Anyaegbunam A, Garfinkel D, Palan PR, Basu J, Romney SL, Preeclampsia and antioxidant nutrients: decreased plasma levels of reduced ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol, and beta-carotene in women with preeclampsia, Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(1) (1994) 150–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Ziari SA, Mireles VL, Cantu CG, Cervantes M 3rd, Idrisa A, Bobsom D, Tsin AT, Glew RH, Serum vitamin A, vitamin E, and beta-carotene levels in preeclamptic women in northern nigeria, Am J Perinatol 13(5) (1996) 287–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Zhang C, Williams MA, Sanchez SE, King IB, Ware-Jauregui S, Larrabure G, Bazul V, Leisenring WM, Plasma concentrations of carotenoids, retinol, and tocopherols in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women, Am J Epidemiol 153(6) (2001) 572–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Moore TA, Ahmad IM, Schmid KK, Berger AM, Ruiz RJ, Pickler RH, Zimmerman MC, Oxidative stress levels throughout pregnancy, at birth, and in the neonate, Biological Research for Nursing; (In press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Ahmad IM, Temme JB, Abdalla MY, Zimmerman MC, Redox status in workers occupationally exposed to long-term low levels of ionizing radiation: A pilot study, Redox Rep 21(3) (2016) 139–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Dangat KD, Mehendale SS, Yadav HR, Kilari AS, Kulkarni AV, Taralekar VS, Joshi SR, Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid composition of breast milk in pre-eclamptic mothers, Neonatology 97(3) (2010) 190–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Kulkarni AV, Mehendale SS, Yadav HR, Kilari AS, Taralekar VS, Joshi SR, Circulating angiogenic factors and their association with birth outcomes in preeclampsia, Hypertens Res 33(6) (2010) 561–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Mehendale S, Kilari A, Dangat K, Taralekar V, Mahadik S, Joshi S, Fatty acids, antioxidants, and oxidative stress in pre-eclampsia, Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100(3) (2008) 234–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Loverro G, Greco P, Capuano F, Carone D, Cormio G, Selvaggi L, Lipoperoxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity in pregnancy complicated with hypertension, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 70(2) (1996) 123–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].S.H. Kashinakunti SV, Gurupadappa K, Shankarprasad DS, Suryaprakash G, Ingin JB. Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Status in Preeclampsia, A l A m e e n J M e d S c i 3(1) (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Madazli R, Benian A, Aydin S, Uzun H, Tolun N, The plasma and placental levels of malondialdehyde, glutathione and superoxide dismutase in pre-eclampsia, J Obstet Gynaecol 22(5) (2002) 477–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Harma M, Harma M, Erel O, Measurement of the total antioxidant response in preeclampsia with a novel automated method, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 118(1) (2005) 47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Mannaerts D, Faes E, Cos P, Briede JJ, Gyselaers W, Cornette J, Gorbanev Y, Bogaerts A, Spaanderman M, Van Craenenbroeck E, Jacquemyn Y, Oxidative stress in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia is linked to chronic inflammation, iron status and vascular function, PLoS One 13(9) (2018) e0202919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Llurba E, Gratacos E, Martin-Gallan P, Cabero L, Dominguez C, A comprehensive study of oxidative stress and antioxidant status in preeclampsia and normal pregnancy, Free Radic Biol Med 37(4) (2004) 557–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].K.M. Cohen JM, Platt RW, Basso O, Evans RW, Kahn SR, The association between maternal antioxidant levels in midpregnancy and preeclampsia, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 213(5) (2015) 695.e1–695.e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Genc H, Uzun H, Benian A, Simsek G, Gelisgen R, Madazli R, Guralp O, Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in first trimester for assessment of preeclampsia risk, Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(6) (2011) 1367–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Rudra CB, Qiu C, David RM, Bralley JA, Walsh SW, Williams MA, A prospective study of early-pregnancy plasma malondialdehyde concentration and risk of preeclampsia, Clin Biochem 39(7) (2006) 722–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].D’Souza V, Rani A, Patil V, Pisal H, Randhir K, Mehendale S, Wagh G, Gupte S, Joshi S, Increased oxidative stress from early pregnancy in women who develop preeclampsia, Clin Exp Hypertens 38(2) (2016) 225–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Stress Oxidative, Inflammation, and Health, Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Ray G, Husain SA, Oxidants, antioxidants and carcinogenesis, Indian J Exp Biol 40(11) (2002) 1213–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Kaur G, Mishra S, Sehgal A, Prasad R, Alterations in lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in pregnancy with preeclampsia, Mol Cell Biochem 313(1–2) (2008) 37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Bayhan G, Atamer Y, Atamer A, Yokus B, Baylan Y, Significance of changes in lipid peroxides and antioxidant enzyme activities in pregnant women with preeclampsia and eclampsia, Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 27(2) (2000) 142–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Kumar AC DU, Lipid peroxides, anti-oxidants and nitric oxide in patients with pre-eclampsia and essential hypertension, Med Sci Monit 6(5) (2000) CR901–907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Atamer Y, Kocyigit Y, Yokus B, Atamer A, Erden AC, Lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense, status of trace metals and leptin levels in preeclampsia, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119(1) (2005) 60–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Patil SB, Kodliwadmath MV, Kodliwadmath M, Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activity in complicated pregnancies, Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 36(2) (2009) 110–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Raijmakers MT, Zusterzeel PL, Roes EM, Steegers EA, Mulder TP, Peters WH, Oxidized and free whole blood thiols in preeclampsia, Obstet Gynecol 97(2) (2001) 272–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Vaziri ND, Wang XQ, Oveisi F, Rad B, Induction of oxidative stress by glutathione depletion causes severe hypertension in normal rats, Hypertension 36(1) (2000) 142–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES