Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Primatol. 2019 Oct 1;49(1):40–43. doi: 10.1111/jmp.12440

SIVcpz cross-species transmission and viral evolution towards HIV-1 in a humanized mouse model

James Curlin 1,*, Kimberly Schmitt 1,*, Leila Remling-Mulder 1, Ryan Moriarty 2, Mark Stenglein 1, Shelby O’Connor 2, Preston Marx 3,4, Ramesh Akkina 1,**
PMCID: PMC6942238  NIHMSID: NIHMS1048818  PMID: 31576587

Abstract

HIV-1 evolved from its progenitor SIV strains, but details are lacking on its adaptation to the human host. We followed the evolution of SIVcpz in humanized mice to mimic cross-species transmission. Increasing viral loads, CD4+ T-cell decline, and non-synonymous mutations were seen in the entire genome reflecting viral adaptation.

INTRODUCTION

How HIV-1 viral strains originating from SIV progenitor viruses SIVcpz and SIVgor evolved to become highly pathogenic to humans is still unclear. The dominant theory posits that serial transmissions in the human population led to increased viral fitness by accumulating adaptive mutations.1 Humanized mice (hu-mice) present an ideal model to mimic the initial transmission and subsequent viral evolution. Hu-mice harbor a transplanted human immune system which includes human CD4+ T-cells, macrophages and dendritic cells permissive for viral infection.212 While three previous studies utilized hu-mice to evaluate this question, the data obtained was limited: in one case, only parts of the viral genomes were subjected to sequence analysis and in each study, only variants from a single terminal timepoint after 14–16 weeks of infection were analyzed.1315 To overcome these limitations, we infected hu-mice with several SIVcpz strains, including SIVcpzEK505 which is closely related to HIV-1 group N. Viremia and CD4+ T-cell levels were monitored for 120 days. To understand viral adaptation and the associated genetic changes, full genome sequence analysis was performed at multiple time points during viral infection (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the hu-HSC mouse generation, viral infection, SIVcpzEK505 plasma viral loads and CD4+ T-cell decline following inoculation. (A.) Neonatal mouse pups were intrahepatically injected with human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells following sublethal irradiation. Mice were screened 8–12 weeks post-reconstitution to determine engraftment levels of human immune cells. (B.) Plasma viral loads and (C.) CD4+ T-cell depletion of SIVcpzEK505-infected and uninfected hu-HSC mice. Statistically significant CD4+ T-cell depletion was seen in the infected mice relative to the uninfected mice (two-tailed Student’s t-test, p<0.05).

RESULTS

Successful infection resulting in viremia was seen in hu-mice challenged with a number of SIVcpz isolates, with the SIVcpzEK505 results presented here. Virus was detected in plasma within one week of inoculation. Viral loads increased gradually by approximately 2 orders of magnitude, peaking around 80 days post-challenge before declining slightly (Figure 1B). There was slow CD4+ T-cell decline from the starting point in the infected mice versus those of the uninfected controls (Figure 1C). Viral genomic RNA obtained from plasma samples from viremic mice at 3, 11, 19 and 22 weeks was subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS). Numerous synonymous and non-synonymous single-nucleotide changes (SNPs) were seen throughout the genome. Non-synonymous SNPs that increased in frequency within the viral population by at least 20% are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that showcase a >20% increase in viral population frequency by 22 weeks post inoculation.

Gene Codon Numbera AA Changeb Highest Endpoint
Frequencyc

Gag 35 V→I 0.88
Gag 105 R→K 0.23
Pol 175 P→Q 0.34
Pol 364 E→K 0.22
Vif 13 V→A 0.41
Vif 55 I→T 0.61
Vif 118 S→A 0.92
Env 402 V→G 0.56
Env 403 G→E 0.99
Env 414 P→T 0.6
Env 601 Q→K 0.77
Env 630 K→R 0.74
Env 668 R→K 0.3
Env 703 E→K 0.6
Env 773 I→K 0.58
Env 829 G→S 0.2
Nef 79 M→L 0.35
a

Codon number based on the beginning of the respective gene

b

The amino acid change resulting from the nonsynonymous mutation

c

The highest detected frequency of the change between samples at the last time point collected

DISCUSSION

Here we utilized the humanized mouse model to mimic the initial cross-species transmission of SIVcpz and understand the viral phenotypic and genetic adaptation in an in vivo context. SIVcpz readily infected hu-mice and was viremic in a week confirming successful transmission to humans. Gradual viral load increases suggest improved viral fitness in human cells. CD4+ T-cell decline indicates viral predilection to these cells comparable to observed immunosuppression in humans. In addition to other shortcomings, previous studies did not provide enough time to adequately determine the variants needed for cross-species adaptation.1315 We analyzed the viral variants at different time points spanning 22 weeks. Multiple SNPs were identified throughout the viral genome in contrast to only a few variants identified in the envelope gene previously. While many mutations were seen at individual early time points, some disappeared subsequently, others persisted across multiple time points, with some even increasing in frequency (Table 1). SNPs displaying a 20% increase in occurrence are presented. These encompass Gag, Pol, Vif, Env, and Nef genes suggesting SIV adaptation to humans requires many allelic changes. We are currently investigating the genomes of later passages of the virus in an effort to identify the major changes that confer improved fitness to overcome human restriction factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of humanized mice

Hu-HSC mice were prepared as described previously (Figure 1A).1620 All animals were cared for according to the CSU IACUC approved protocols.

EK505 Viral propagation and in vivo infection

HEK 293T cells were transfected with the SIVcpzEK505 plasmid, kindly provided by Dr. Preston Marx. After 48 hours, the supernatant was ultracentrifuged using a 20% sucrose cushion and 200 uL (TCID50 3.2×105) of the concentrated virus was injected intraperitoneally into 5 well-engrafted (>60% CD45+, >50% CD4+) hu-HSC mice (Figure 1A). Viral Titer was determined using TZM-bl reporter cells as previously described.2125

Plasma viral load (PVL) and CD4+ T-cell level evaluation

To determine the PVLs and CD4+ T-cell engraftment, peripheral blood was obtained on a weekly and bimonthly basis respectively by tail vein puncture (Figure 1). The E.Z.N.A Viral RNA kit (Omega bio-tek, Norcross, CA) was used to extract viral RNA from the plasma, which was quantified as previously described using the iScript One-Step RT-PCR kit with SYBR Green per the manufacturer’s guidelines (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA).16 Mouse anti-human CD45-FITC (eBioscience), CD3-PE (eBioscience), and CD4-PE/Cy5 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) antibodies were used to stain whole blood samples. CD4+ T-cell levels were determined within the CD45+CD3+ population using the BD Accuri C6 cytometer as described previously.16 CD4+ T-cell decline between the infected and uninfected mice was assessed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. (p<0.05).

NGS and genomic analysis

Amplicons for sequencing were generated using RNA samples from timepoints 3-, 11-, 19- and 22-weeks post-inoculation. Multiplexed whole-genome spanning primer pools were designed using the Primal Scheme software.26 Samples were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library preparation kit and sequenced at the University of Wisconsin, Madison sequencing core facility using a MiSeq Illumina desktop sequencer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Reads were mapped to the SIVcpzEK505 stock virus (GenBank accession Number: DQ373065.1) using bowtie2 software v2.2.5.27 These alignments were combined with lofreq software v2.1.2 to call variants.28 Each variant required >20 reads depth of coverage and >20% frequency increase relative to the stock virus.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Work reported here was supported by NIH, USA grant R01 AI12334 to R. A. Additional resources used here were supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the NIH through grant OD011104 at the Tulane National Primate Research Center and NIH grant P51OD011106 at the Wisconsin Primate Research Center.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Marx PA, Alcabes PG, Drucker E. Serial human passage of simian immunodeficiency virus by unsterile injections and the emergence of epidemic human immunodeficiency virus in Africa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356(1410):911–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Akkina R. New generation humanized mice for virus research: comparative aspects and future prospects. Virology. 2013;435(1):14–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Akkina R. Human immune responses and potential for vaccine assessment in humanized mice. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(3):403–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lan P, Tonomura N, Shimizu A, Wang S, Yang YG. Reconstitution of a functional human immune system in immunodeficient mice through combined human fetal thymus/liver and CD34+ cell transplantation. Blood. 2006;108(2):487–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shultz LD, Brehm MA, Garcia-Martinez JV, Greiner DL. Humanized mice for immune system investigation: progress, promise and challenges. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(11):786–798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ito R, Takahashi T, Katano I, Ito M. Current advances in humanized mouse models. Cell Mol Immunol. 2012;9(3):208–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garcia S, Freitas AA. Humanized mice: current states and perspectives. Immunol Lett. 2012;146(1–2):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Melkus MW, Estes JD, Padgett-Thomas A, et al. Humanized mice mount specific adaptive and innate immune responses to EBV and TSST-1. Nat Med. 2006;12(11):1316–1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Denton PW, Garcia JV. Humanized mouse models of HIV infection. AIDS Rev. 2011;13(3):135–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Charlins P, Schmitt K, Remling-Mulder L, et al. A humanized mouse-based HIV-1 viral outgrowth assay with higher sensitivity than in vitro qVOA in detecting latently infected cells from individuals on ART with undetectable viral loads. Virology. 2017;507:135–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Choudhary SK, Archin NM, Cheema M, Dahl NP, Garcia JV, Margolis DM. Latent HIV-1 infection of resting CD4(+) T cells in the humanized Rag2(−)/(−) gammac(−)/(−) mouse. J Virol. 2012;86(1):114–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neff CP, Ndolo T, Tandon A, Habu Y, Akkina R. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis by anti-retrovirals raltegravir and maraviroc protects against HIV-1 vaginal transmission in a humanized mouse model. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yuan Z, Kang G, Ma F, et al. Recapitulating Cross-Species Transmission of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVcpz to Humans by Using Humanized BLT Mice. J Virol. 2016;90(17):7728–7739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sato K, Misawa N, Takeuchi JS, et al. Experimental Adaptive Evolution of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVcpz to Pandemic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by Using a Humanized Mouse Model. J Virol. 2018;92(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yuan Z, Kang G, Daharsh L, Fan W, Li Q. SIVcpz closely related to the ancestral HIV-1 is less or non-pathogenic to humans in a hu-BLT mouse model. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schmitt K, Mohan Kumar D, Curlin J, et al. Modeling the evolution of SIV sooty mangabey progenitor virus towards HIV-2 using humanized mice. Virology. 2017;510:175–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akkina RK, Rosenblatt JD, Campbell AG, Chen IS, Zack JA. Modeling human lymphoid precursor cell gene therapy in the SCID-hu mouse. Blood. 1994;84(5):1393–1398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bai J, Gorantla S, Banda N, Cagnon L, Rossi J, Akkina R. Characterization of anti-CCR5 ribozyme-transduced CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro and in a SCID-hu mouse model in vivo. Mol Ther. 2000;1(3):244–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Veselinovic M, Charlins P, Akkina R. Modeling HIV-1 Mucosal Transmission and Prevention in Humanized Mice. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1354:203–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berges BK, Akkina SR, Folkvord JM, Connick E, Akkina R. Mucosal transmission of R5 and X4 tropic HIV-1 via vaginal and rectal routes in humanized Rag2−/− gammac −/− (RAG-hu) mice. Virology. 2008;373(2):342–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Platt EJ, Bilska M, Kozak SL, Kabat D, Montefiori DC. Evidence that ecotropic murine leukemia virus contamination in TZM-bl cells does not affect the outcome of neutralizing antibody assays with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2009;83(16):8289–8292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takeuchi Y, McClure MO, Pizzato M. Identification of gammaretroviruses constitutively released from cell lines used for human immunodeficiency virus research. J Virol. 2008;82(24):12585–12588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wei X, Decker JM, Liu H, et al. Emergence of resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in patients receiving fusion inhibitor (T-20) monotherapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(6):1896–1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Derdeyn CA, Decker JM, Sfakianos JN, et al. Sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to the fusion inhibitor T-20 is modulated by coreceptor specificity defined by the V3 loop of gp120. J Virol. 2000;74(18):8358–8367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Platt EJ, Wehrly K, Kuhmann SE, Chesebro B, Kabat D. Effects of CCR5 and CD4 cell surface concentrations on infections by macrophagetropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1998;72(4):2855–2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quick J, Grubaugh ND, Pullan ST, et al. Multiplex PCR method for MinION and Illumina sequencing of Zika and other virus genomes directly from clinical samples. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(6):1261–1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilm A, Aw PP, Bertrand D, et al. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(22):11189–11201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES