Skip to main content
World Journal of Surgical Oncology logoLink to World Journal of Surgical Oncology
. 2020 Jan 4;18:6. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1775-5

Time-varying pattern of recurrence risk for localized melanoma in China

Xizhi Wen 1,#, Dandan Li 1,#, Jingjing Zhao 1, Jingjing Li 1, Tao Yang 2, Ya Ding 1, Ruiqing Peng 1, Baoyan Zhu 1, Fuxue Huang 1, Xiaoshi Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC6942369  PMID: 31901239

Abstract

Background

Acral and mucosal melanomas are rarely seen in Caucasians but common in China. There are limited data on the recurrence characteristics for these patients. This study aimed to identify the recurrence pattern for localized melanoma in China, especially acral and mucosal subtypes.

Methods

Patients with localized melanoma who underwent radical resection between January 1999 and December 2014 in southern China were retrospectively reviewed. Survival and annual recurrence hazard were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method and hazard function, respectively.

Results

Totally, 1012 patients were included (acral melanoma 400; chronic sun-induced damage (CSD)/non-CSD melanoma 314; mucosal melanoma 298). Recurrence was recorded in 808 patients (localized 14.1%; regional 29.6%, and distant 56.3%). Mucosal melanoma had local and M1c stage recurrence more frequently than cutaneous melanoma, but less frequent regional node relapse. There was no difference in recurrent site distribution between acral and CSD/non-CSD melanoma. The annual recurrence hazard curve for the entire cohort showed a double-peaked pattern with the first major peak in the second year after surgery and the second peak near the seventh year. Mucosal melanoma had a higher recurrence risk than cutaneous melanoma. Acral melanoma had a lower flat recurrence peak than CSD/non-CSD melanoma. Tumor thickness > 4.0 mm, ulceration, positive regional nodes, and wound infection were associated with a higher recurrence risk in cutaneous melanoma. Adjuvant therapy reduced the recurrence risk of cutaneous melanoma but not of mucosal melanoma.

Conclusions

This is a large cohort about the rule of recurrence risk in acral and mucosal melanoma and will provide an initial framework for development of surveillance and adjuvant strategy for Chinese melanoma patients.

Keywords: Melanoma, Recurrence hazard, Chinese population

Introduction

Malignant melanoma is a heterogenous group of melanocytic neoplasms diagnosed in approximately 20,000 people annually in China [1]. Most patients diagnosed with localized disease are considered curable. However, the risk of loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis remains high, at between 30 and 60% in cutaneous melanoma and between 59 and 100% in mucosal melanoma [2, 3]. Therefore, understanding the regularity of recurrence is essential for guiding appropriate treatment in localized melanoma patients.

There are significant demographic and ethnic differences in melanoma. In the Chinese population, melanoma arising from the skin accounts for between 50 and 70%, with the acral areas being the most common primary sites. Mucosal melanoma is the second most common subtype, with a percentage incidence of between 22 and 25% [4]. For Caucasians, approximately 90% of melanoma arise from the skin, commonly on skin of non-acral sites, while melanoma arising from the mucous membranes and acral areas account for between 1 and 5% [5]. Acral and mucosal melanomas have been reported to have distinct genetic and clinical characteristics and a poorer prognosis [69]. The existing melanoma follow-up schedules in China are based on evidence derived from western countries. Postoperative recurrence characteristics of localized melanoma in Chinese patients, especially regarding the acral and mucosal types, are scarce.

In most studies about melanoma, the recurrence risk is analyzed by survival curves but not hazard rates. Compared with survival curves, the hazard rate can reflect both the magnitude of the recurrence rate and its variation with time. The objective of this study was to identify the patterns and high-risk periods of recurrence in Chinese melanoma patients using the hazard function, especially concerning the acral and mucosal melanoma types, and to provide a reference for the designing of follow-up schedules and adjuvant therapy.

Methods

Patients

All histologically confirmed malignant melanoma patients who had received radical resection and admitted in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) between January 1999 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients included in this study met the following criteria: (1) histologically confirmed malignant melanoma; (2) no distant metastasis was found before operation; (3) patients underwent radical surgery; and (4) patients were followed up for at least 3 months. Patients were excluded from the study if they received incomplete resection or neoadjuvant therapy or died of surgical complications. Patients were staged or restaged retrospectively according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (7th edition). Because sentinel lymph node biopsy is not routinely carried out at our center, only some of the stage I and stage II patients in this study received regional lymph node biopsy. The ultrasonography of regional lymph nodes was routinely carried out as an alternative. Regional lymph node dissection was routinely applied for clinical stage III patients.

Classification of recurrence

Recurrent sites were categorized into five sites corresponding with AJCC staging criteria, namely: (1) local recurrence; (2) regional nodes, including in transit metastasis; (3) distant skin, soft tissue including muscles, and/or nonregional lymph nodes (M1a); (4) the lungs with or without skin or soft tissue involvement (M1b); and (5) other distant sites, including the liver, gastrointestinal, bone, central nervous system, adrenal glands, eye, and any other sites, and death due to metastases (M1c). If multiple recurrences occurred at the same time, recurrences were counted as one event. A site was classified according to the site with the worst expected prognosis based on staging criteria indicating that non-pulmonary visceral metastases represented the poorest prognostic group, followed by pulmonary metastases, distant skin and soft tissue, and local regional recurrence only.

Statistical analysis

The statistical methods referred to Zhu JF’s study [10]. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was measured from the time of surgery to the earliest occurrence of relapse (loco-regional or distant), last follow-up, or death from melanoma. Patients who were lost to follow-up or alive at the end of the study were censored for data analysis. RFS was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. For the multivariable analyses, we used two methods to check the proportional hazards (PH) assumption: graphical and time-dependent variable approaches. The variables that did not satisfy PH hypothesis were defined as time-dependent variables, which were introduced into the Cox regression model to form Time-Depended Cox Regression Model. The comparison of frequency between each group was performed using the chi-square test. The kernel smoothing method was used to estimate the annual hazard rates and display the graphical display of RFS. A two-sided probability value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were performed using the Stata statistical software package.

Results

Patient characteristics

Total of 1012 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in this study. The median age was 53 years (range, 14–89 years), and the study comprised 534 males and 478 females. Among 714 patients with cutaneous melanoma, 400 were diagnosed with acral melanoma and 314 were diagnosed with melanoma on the skin with chronic sun-induced damage (CSD) or melanoma on skin without chronic sun-induced damage (non-CSD). There were 298 patients with mucosal melanoma included in this study, accounting for 29.4% of all patients. The most common sites of mucosal melanoma were the head and neck (63.1%), followed by the genitourinary tract (21.5%) and the digestive tract (14.1%). In addition, there were 4 patients (1.3%) with mucosal melanoma originating in the respiratory tract. There were 368 cutaneous melanoma patients and 105 mucosal melanoma patients who received adjuvant therapy postoperatively. The clinicopathological characteristics of these patients are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with localized melanoma

Characteristics No. %
Age (years)
 Median 53
 Range 14-89
Sex
 Male 534 52.8
 Female 478 47.2
Clinical subtypes
 Acral 400 39.5
 CSD/non-CSD 314 31.0
Mucosal 298 29.4
Anatomic site for mucosal melanoma
 Head and neck 188 63.1
 Genitourinary tract 64 21.5
 Digestive tract 42 14.1
 Respiratory tract 4 1.3
AJCC stage (for cutaneous melanoma only)
 I 39 5.4
 II 361 50.6
 III 314 44.0
Ulceration (for cutaneous melanoma only)
 Present 342 47.9
 Absent 372 52.1
Primary tumor thickness (for cutaneous melanoma only)
 ≤ 4.0 mm 228 31.9
 > 4.0 mm 354 49.6
 Not available 132 18.5
Regional lymph node metastasis (for cutaneous melanoma only)
 Yes 400 56.0
 No 314 44.0
Wound infection after surgery (for cutaneous melanoma only)
 Yes 69 9.7
 No 645 90.3
Adjuvant therapy for cutaneous melanoma
 Interferon a-2b 246 34.5
 Chemotherapy 119 16.7
 Radiotherapy 3 0.4
 None 346 48.4
Adjuvant therapy for mucosal melanoma
 Chemotherapy 47 15.8
 Interferon a-2b 41 13.8
 Radiotherapy 17 5.7
 None 193 64.8

CSD melanoma on skin with chronic sun-induce damage, non-CSD melanoma on skin without chronic sun-induced damage

Overall recurrence patterns

A total of 808 patients (cutaneous melanoma, n = 559; mucosal melanoma, n = 249) experienced relapse after a median follow-up time of 60 months. The first recurrence was diagnosed within 2 years in 81.8% of the patients, and late recurrences, diagnosed more than 5 years after surgery, were observed in 4.5% of the patients.

Altogether, 114 (14.1%) of all first recurrences were classified as local, 239 patients (29.6%) presented with regional and 455 (56.3%) with distant metastases. The median times to relapse for local, regional, and distant metastases were 8 months, 12 months, and 10 months, respectively. The distribution of recurrence sites was related to pathological types. Compared to cutaneous melanoma, mucosal melanoma had a significantly higher frequency of local recurrence and a lower frequency of regional recurrence (detailed in Table 2). When the distant recurrence was concerned, there were also differences in the distribution of metastasis sites between cutaneous melanoma and mucosal melanoma. The most common metastasis site of mucosal melanoma was other distant site (M1c), followed by the skin or soft tissue (M1a), and finally the lung (M1b). However, for cutaneous melanoma, the most common site of metastasis was the skin/soft tissue (M1a), followed by other distant sites (M1c), and finally the lung (M1b) (Fig. 1). However, there was no statistical difference in the distribution of the recurrence sites between acral and non-acral cutaneous melanoma (P > 0.1). The regional lymph node status at diagnosis correlated with the site of recurrence in cutaneous melanoma. Patients with regional lymph node metastasis at diagnosis were more likely to have distant metastasis. The most common site of recurrence in patients without regional lymph node metastasis at diagnosis was the regional lymph node, followed by distant metastasis (Table 3).

Table 2.

The relationship between pathological type and the first recurrent sites

Pathology First recurrent sites
Local n (%) Regional Distant
Cutaneous 33 (5.9%) 213(38.1%) 313(56.0%)
Mucosal 81(32.5%) 26(10.4%) 142(57.0%)
Total 114(14.1%) 239(29.6%) 455(5.3%)

P < 0.001

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Comparisons of the frequencies of metastatic sites between cutaneous and mucosal melanoma. The most common metastasis site of mucosal melanoma was other distant sites besides the lung, skin, or soft tissue, but for cutaneous melanoma, the most common site was the skin/soft tissue. P value refers to the chi-square test of the proportion of the metastasis sites for the two groups

Table 3.

The relationship between regional lymph node status and the first recurrent sites in cutaneous melanoma

Regional lymph node at diagnosis First recurrent sites
Local Regional lymph node Distant metastasis
Not involved 25(8.7%) 142(49.7%) 119(41.6%)
Involved 8(2.9%) 71(26.0%) 194(71.1%)
Total 33(5.9%) 213(38.1%) 313(56.0%)

P < 0.005

Survival analysis according to clinicopathological factors

The median RFS for the whole group was 12.0 months. The life-table survival analysis found that the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year recurrence rates for the whole cohort were 38.0%, 28.0%, 26.0%, 17.0%, and 22.0%, respectively. The median RFS for acral and CSD/non-CSD melanoma was 16 months and 12 months, respectively. For cutaneous melanoma, the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year recurrence rates were 38%, 26%, 24%, 17%, and 25%, respectively. For mucosal melanoma, the median RFS was 11 months, and the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year recurrence rates were 40.0%, 34%, 33.0%, 18.0%, and 0%, respectively. Both univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that primary non-acral type tumors, tumor thickness greater than 4 mm, primary tumor with ulceration, regional lymph node metastasis, and wound infection postoperatively related to a shorter RFS in cutaneous melanoma. Only lymph node metastasis did not satisfy PH hypothesis with its HR value changes with time. The PH assumption test for each variable is listed in Table 4. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve based on each factor is shown in Fig. 2. Adjuvant therapy favored RFS for those with cutaneous melanoma. The anatomic site and postoperative adjuvant therapy, whether chemotherapy, interferon, or radiotherapy, did not relate to the RFS for those with mucosal melanoma. Patient age or sex did not correlate with RFS in the whole cohort. Univariable and multivariable analyses of RFS according to patient’s clinicopathological characteristics are listed in Tables 5 and 6.

Table 4.

The PH assumption test for variables included in multivariate regression

Time-dependent covariate Wald χ2 P
Primary site *LN(T_) 3.225 0.073
Tumor thickness *LN(T_) 3.214 0.073
Ulceration *LN(T_) 0.156 0.693
Regipnal lymph node metastasis*LN(T_) 26.93 < 0.01
Wound infection *LN(T_) 3.608 0.057
Adjuvant therapy*LN(T_) 0.061 0.805

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier curves for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in 714 patients with cutaneous melanoma analyzed by clinicopathological factors. a RFS analysis by primary site; b RFS analysis by tumor thickness; c RFS analysis by ulceration; d RFS analysis by regional lymph node metastasis; e RFS analysis by wound infection; and f RFS analysis by adjuvant therapy

Table 5.

Kaplan–Meier postoperative survival analysis (log-rank test) according to clinical-pathological factors

Variable mRFS(months) P
Sex 0.135
 Male 12
 Female 13
Age 0.854
 ≤ 65 13
 > 65 12
Pathological type 0.001
 Mucosal melanoma 11
 Cutaneous melanoma 14
Clinical subtypes for cutaneous melanoma 0.009
 Acral 16
 CSD/N-CSD 12
Primary site for mucosal melanoma 0.798
 Head and neck 11
 Genitourinary tract 12
 Digestive tract 12
 Respiratory tract 13
Primary tumor thickness for cutaneous melanoma < 0.01
 ≤ 4.0 mm 30
 > 4.0 mm 12
Ulceration for cutaneous melanoma 0.012
 Present 13
 Absent 15
Regional lymph node metastasis for cutaneous melanoma < 0.001
 Yes 8
 No 24
Stage for cutaneous melanoma < 0.001
 I 82
 II 20
 III 8
Wound infection for cutaneous melanoma < 0.001
 Yes 6
 No 15
Adjuvant therapy for cutaneous melanoma 0.021
 Yes 15
 No 13
Adjuvant therapy for mucosal melanoma 0.302
 Yes 12
 No 11

CSD melanoma on skin with chronic sun-induce damage, non-CSD melanoma on skin without chronic sun-induced damage

Table 6.

Results of multivariable survival analyses for RFS according to the extended Cox regression model in cutaneous melanoma

Variable HR 95%CI of HR P
Primary site < 0.01
 CSD/non-CSD 1.46 1.20–1.79
 Acral 1
Tumor thickness < 0.01
 > 4 mm 1.96 1.59–2.43
 ≤ 4 mm 1
Ulceration 0.005
 Present 1.32 1.09–1.61
 Absent 1
Regional lymph node metastasis < 0.01
 Yes Exp [1.906–0.519ln(t)]
 No 1
Wound infection < 0.001
 Yes 2.29 1.70–3.07
 No 1
Adjuvant therapy < 0.001
 Yes 0.66 0.55–0.80
 No 1

CSD melanoma on skin with chronic sun-induce damage; non-CSD melanoma on skin without chronic sun-induce damage; t follow-up time after surgery

Recurrence hazard analysis

The annual recurrence hazard curve for the entire cohort showed a double-peaked pattern, with a first major recurrence peak at the second year after surgery and covering the first 3 years. The curve then began to fall until the fifth year after surgery, at which point the curves began to rise again, reaching a second peak in the seventh year (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Recurrent hazard curve for the whole cohort

Subsequently, we compared the recurrence risk concerning different clinicopathological factors, including primary tumor subtype, tumor thickness, ulceration of primary tumor, regional lymph node status, surgical complications (wound infection), and adjuvant therapy. When the hazard rate was related to primary tumor subtype, the analysis showed that mucosal melanoma had a higher recurrence risk than acral or non-acral cutaneous melanoma throughout the observation period. Acral cutaneous melanoma had a lower recurrence risk than non-acral cutaneous melanoma during the first 3 years after surgery and then rose to show a higher recurrence risk in the following 3 to 7 follow-up years and returned to a steady decline afterwards (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Recurrence hazard analysis according to clinicopathological characteristics. a pathological types; b primary tumor thickness of cutaneous melanoma; c: ulceration of primary lesion in cutaneous melanoma; d regional lymph node status for cutaneous melanoma; e wound infection of cutaneous melanoma; f adjuvant therapy in cutaneous melanoma; g adjuvant therapy in mucosal melanoma

In the cutaneous melanoma subgroup, the time distribution of the recurrence risk varied with tumor thickness, ulceration, regional lymph node status, and postoperative complications. Patients with primary tumor thickness greater than 4 mm (T4) demonstrated a more pronounced and variable pattern compared with those with a tumor thickness of ≤ 4 mm (T1-3). Compared with T4 patients, recurrence peaks for T1-3 patients were relatively flat and late (Fig. 4b). The double-peaked pattern was revealed in both ulcerated and non-ulcerated subgroups with the smoothed hazard plots parallel to each other. The annual recurrence hazard curve showed that patients with ulcerative tumors had more recurrences during all analysis periods (Fig. 4c). Patients with regional lymph node metastasis at diagnosis revealed taller and steep peaks than patients with negative regional lymph nodes. The hazard curves crossed during the third to the seventh year after surgery (Fig. 4d). Patients who had wound infection after surgery had a markedly higher and earlier recurrence than those without postoperative wound infection (Fig. 4e).

Adjuvant therapy has varying effects on the recurrence curve in different melanoma subtypes. In cutaneous melanoma, the hazard rates for patients receiving adjuvant therapy was lower with the second peak appeared later and flatter than in the non-adjuvant therapy patients (Fig. 4f). In the mucosal melanoma group, adjuvant therapy reduced the magnitude of the two recurrence peaks, with the peaks remaining relatively stable. The hazard curves crossed during the low recurrence risk period (Fig. 4g).

Discussion

There have been few reports on the time distribution of recurrence hazard rates for acral and mucosal melanomas. In the present study, we compared recurrence patterns between different melanoma subtypes and demonstrated the presence of two peaks for recurrence risk among Chinese patients with malignant melanoma, most of whom had acral and mucosal subtypes after complete resection. This pattern has been similarly observed in various tumors such as breast cancer, lung cancer, and gastric cancer [1012].

The site of recurrence has been reported to be a factor influencing survival after relapse. In our study, we demonstrated that most patients recurred as distant metastases, rather than local or regional recurrences, for both cutaneous and mucosal melanoma, which is similar to findings in another report [13]. In subgroup analysis, we found that mucosal melanoma had a higher frequency of local failure than cutaneous melanoma. This pattern indicated that, aside from systemic adjuvant therapy, local therapy such as radiation therapy [14, 15], is also very important for mucosal melanoma. Concerning the pattern of metastatic disease, mucosal melanoma is more likely to metastasize to distant sites other than the skin or the lung, which may explain their short overall survival.

Cutaneous melanoma with regional lymph node involvement at diagnosis had a higher frequency of distant recurrence in our study. Systemic adjuvant therapy should be recommended in preference to local treatment for regional lymph node-positive disease, due to the recurrence pattern of this disease. Patients with negative regional lymph node involvement at diagnosis showed a higher frequency of local regional recurrence than those with positive regional nodes (49.7% vs 26.0%). The possible reason for this difference is that sentinel lymph node biopsy has not been routinely implemented in our center, which may have resulted in not always detecting clinical occult regional lymph node metastasis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot prolong overall survival [16]. Immediate completion lymph node dissection after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy did not increase melanoma-specific survival but was associated with an increased risk of complications such as wound dehiscence or infection, hematoma, and lymphedema [17]. Therefore, in China, where sentinel lymph node biopsy is not widely promoted, it may be a reasonable option to design an intensified follow-up schedule for regional lymph nodes after resection of the primary lesion for patients with clinically negative regional lymph nodes. On the other hand, we found that patients with wound infection after surgery had a higher recurrence risk and a shorter RFS than those without infection, which suggests that a wider range of surgery needs to be considered carefully.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have had significant success in treating metastatic melanoma, allowing patients to achieve a long-term survival [18]. Patients with lower tumor burden and good performance are usually associated with good response rates and longer survival [19]. A structured surveillance program should have a favorable effect on patient prognosis through detecting a recurrence before a patient becomes symptomatic to ensure early treatment. In contrast to melanoma in Caucasians, melanoma in people of Chinese ethnicity manifests as a higher ratio of acral and mucosal types. However, limited data are available regarding the optimal surveillance strategy for patients diagnosed with mucosal or acral melanomas. The existing follow-up schedules for melanoma in the Chinese population are based on previous experiences with Caucasians. Using hazard rate analyses, we found that the risk of initial recurrence in Chinese melanoma patients tended to peak within the first 1 to 2 years after surgery and covered the first 3 years, which is consistent with another report concerning about Caucasians [20]. Our study results support the NCCN guideline recommendation for a routine follow-up every 3 to 6 months for 3 years, and then every 4 to 12 months for two further years [21]. However, it is not recommended to extend the follow-up interval after 5 years, because of the late peak in the seventh year. Additionally, the first recurrent peak involving the first 3 years found in our study supports a long course of adjuvant therapy.

High-risk factors, including ulceration, tumor thickness, and regional lymph node metastasis, are prognostic factors associated with increased risks of recurrence and a shorter survival time among cutaneous melanoma patients [22]. In this study, a double-peaked pattern was observed in a variety of melanoma subgroups. However, for patients with high-risk factors, they exhibited earlier and higher peaks. These factors should be taken into consideration when considering adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategy.

Acral melanoma has been reported to have a worse prognosis than other types of cutaneous melanoma [6, 23]. Acral melanoma might have a later stage presentation at diagnosis as compared to cutaneous superficial spread melanoma in endemic regions, which may be one of the reasons for its poor prognosis. There are also studies showing that acral melanoma does not differ in terms of patient survival and biological behavior from non-acral melanoma [24]. In the current study, we found that acral melanoma showed a longer RFS and a lower recurrence risk than non-acral cutaneous melanoma. One possible explanation for this was that the stage distribution in our series was uneven. There was a lower proportion of stage III disease included in the acral melanoma group in this study (49.4% for acral melanoma vs 39.8% for non-acral cutaneous melanoma). Another explanation was that acral melanoma was reported to have a significantly lower proportion of BRAF mutations than non-acral cutaneous melanoma [25], and BRAF mutation in melanoma was associated with poor prognosis [26], which may lead to a better prognosis for acral melanoma in this study.

Conclusions

This study involved a large cohort of Chinese melanoma patients with a substantial proportion of acral and mucosal melanoma, providing a preliminary framework for analyzing the patterns and timing of disease recurrence, which is an important step in developing surveillance strategies and adjuvant therapy schedule. Limited by the retrospective design and the lack of routine sentinel lymph node biopsies, further prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusion.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CSD

Chronic sun-induced damage

AJCC

American Joint Committee on Cancer

RFS

Recurrence-free survival

NCCN

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Authors’ contributions

XW, DL, and XZ contributed to the research design. XW, BZ, and YD contributed to the acquisition of the data. XW, JZ, and JL contributed to the analysis and interpretation. XW contributed to the manuscript drafting. TY and FH gave statistical advice. RP participated in the review of the paper. XZ supervised the research. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final revision.

Funding

This study received support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81772910).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and was also conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all patients signed the informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xizhi Wen and Dandan Li contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Guo J, Qin S, Liang J, et al. Chinese Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma (2015 Edition) Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(21):322. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6199–6206. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lian B, Si L, Cui C, et al. Phase II randomized trial comparing high-dose IFN-α2b with temozolomide plus cisplatin as systemic adjuvant therapy for resected mucosal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(16):4488–4498. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chi Z, Li S, Sheng X, et al. Clinical presentation, histology, and prognoses of malignant melanoma in ethnic Chinese: a study of 522 consecutive cases. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McLaughlin CC, Wu XC, Jemal A, Martin HJ, Roche LM, Chen VW. Incidence of noncutaneous melanomas in the U.S. Cancer. 2005;103(5):1000–1007. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, McMaster ML, Tucker MA. Acral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1986-2005. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(4):427–434. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2008.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Furney SJ, Turajlic S, Stamp G, et al. Genome sequencing of mucosal melanomas reveals that they are driven by distinct mechanisms from cutaneous melanoma. J Pathol. 2013;230(3):261–269. doi: 10.1002/path.4204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lian B, Cui CL, Zhou L, et al. The natural history and patterns of metastases from mucosal melanoma: an analysis of 706 prospectively-followed patients. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(4):868–873. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou QM, Li W, Zhang X, et al. The mutation profiles of common oncogenes involved in melanoma in southern China. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(7):1935–7. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feng XY, Chen YB, Wang W, et al. Time-varying pattern of recurrence risk for gastric cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2013;30(2):514. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0514-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yin W, Di G, Zhou L, et al. Time-varying pattern of recurrence risk for Chinese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(3):527–535. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhu JF, Feng XY, Zhang XW, et al. Time-varying pattern of postoperative recurrence risk of early-stage (T1a-T2bN0M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of a single-center study of 994 Chinese patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Romano E, Scordo M, Dusza SW, Coit DG, Chapman PB. Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3042–3047. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lai Y, Meng X, Liu Q, Lu H, Guo L, Wang S, et al. Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival for sinonasal mucosal melanoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Yao JJ, Zhang F, Zhang GS, Deng XW, Zhang WJ, Lawrence WR, et al. Efficacy and safety of primary surgery with postoperative radiotherapy in head and neck mucosal melanoma: a single-arm Phase II study. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:6985–6996. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S185017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(7):599–609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2211–2222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1345–1356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ribas A, Hamid O, Daud A, et al. Association of pembrolizumab with tumor response and survival among patients with advanced melanoma. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1600–1609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Salama AK, de Rosa N, Scheri RP, et al. Hazard-rate analysis and patterns of recurrence in early stage melanoma: moving towards a rationally designed surveillance strategy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coit DG, Thompson JA, Algazi A, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Melanoma, Version 3.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14(8):945–958. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472–492. doi: 10.3322/caac.21409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bello DM, Chou JF, Panageas KS, et al. Prognosis of acral melanoma: a series of 281 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3618–3625. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3089-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wada Maiko, Ito Takamichi, Tsuji Gaku, Nakahara Takeshi, Hagihara Akihito, Furue Masutaka, Uchi Hiroshi. Acral lentiginous melanoma versus other melanoma: A single-center analysis in Japan. The Journal of Dermatology. 2017;44(8):932–938. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Si L, Kong Y, Xu X, et al. Prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in Chinese melanoma patients: large scale analysis of BRAF and NRAS mutations in a 432-case cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Houben R, Becker JC, Kappel A, Terheyden P, Bröcker EB, Goetz R, et al. Constitutive activation of the Ras-Raf signaling pathway in metastatic melanoma is associated with poor prognosis. J Carcinog. 2004;3:6. doi: 10.1186/1477-3163-3-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from World Journal of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES