Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Aug 1;6(8):e914–e923. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30242-0

Divergent trends in ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative mortality study

Calvin Ke 1, Rajeev Gupta 2, Denis Xavier 3, Dorairaj Prabhakaran 4, Prashant Mathur 5, Yogeshwar V Kalkonde 6, Patrycja Kolpak 7, Wilson Suraweera 7, Prabhat Jha, for the Million Death Study Collaborators7,*
PMCID: PMC6942542  EMSID: EMS85331  PMID: 30012272

Summary

Introduction

India accounts for about a fifth of cardiovascular deaths globally, but nationally representative data on mortality trends are not yet available. In this nationwide mortality study, we aimed to assess the trends in ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality over 15 years using the Million Death Study.

Methods

We determined national and subnational cardiovascular mortality rates and trends by sex and birth cohort using cause of death ascertained by verbal autopsy from 2001 to 2013 among 2·4 million households. We derived mortality rates for ischaemic heart disease and stroke by applying mortality proportions to UN mortality estimates for India and projected the rates from 2000 to 2015.

Findings

Cardiovascular disease caused more than 2·1 million deaths in India in 2015 at all ages, or more than a quarter of all deaths. At ages 30–69 years, of 1·3 million cardiovascular deaths, 0·9 million (68·4%) were caused by ischaemic heart disease and 0·4 million (28·0%) by stroke. At these ages, the probability of dying from ischaemic heart disease increased during 2000–15, from 10·4% to 13·1% in men and 4·8% to 6·6% in women. Ischaemic heart disease mortality rates in rural areas increased rapidly and surpassed those in urban areas. By contrast, the probability of dying from stroke decreased from 5·7% to 5·0% in men and 5·0% to 3·9% in women. A third of premature stroke deaths occurred in the northeastern states, inhabited by a sixth of India’s population, where rates increased significantly and were three times higher than the national average. The increased mortality rates of ischaemic heart disease nationally and stroke in the northeastern states were higher in the cohorts of adults born in the 1970s onwards, than in earlier decades. A large and growing proportion of the ischaemic heart disease nationally and stroke deaths in high-burden states reported earlier diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, but low medication use.

Interpretation

The unexpectedly diverse patterns of cardiovascular mortality require investigation to identify the role of established and new cardiovascular risk factors. Secondary prevention with effective and inexpensive long-term treatment and adult smoking cessation could prevent substantial numbers of premature deaths. Without progress against the control of cardiovascular disease in India, global goals to reduce non-communicable diseases by 2030 will be difficult to achieve.

Funding

Fogarty International Center of the US National Institutes of Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Indian Council of Medical Research, and the Disease Control Priorities.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease, comprising mostly ischaemic heart disease and stroke, is the leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 17·7 million deaths annually.1 Of these deaths, 6·2 million (35%) occur in middle age (30–69 years).1 WHO estimates that India accounts for just over a fifth of these deaths1 and therefore reduction of global cardiovascular mortality greatly depends on India, where cardiovascular disease develops a decade earlier in life compared with high-income countries.2

Cardiovascular mortality has not been measured directly and systematically across India, with evidence on burdens mostly drawn from small, local studies.24 Over the past 15 years, unequal distribution of the country’s rapid economic growth and urbanisation has probably contributed to marked regional differences in the key risk factors for cardiovascular mortality.5 Understanding of the differences in cardiovascular mortality by sex, rural and urban residence, and age across India can help to plan prevention and treatment services and identify causes that might differ from cardiovascular risk factors documented in high-income countries.6 We aimed to examine the trends in ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality using the Million Death Study, a large ongoing nationally representative mortality study.7

Methods

Study design and setting

In India, most deaths occur at home and are not captured in official records. To generate reliable vital statistics, the Registrar General of India (RGI) established the Sample Registration System in 1971.8 After every decennial census, the RGI partitions India into 1 million small units, each of about 150–300 households. The RGI then selects a random sample of these units to monitor deaths over the next decade. 6671 and 7597 units were selected after the 1991 and 2001 censuses, respectively, representing the 2·4 million households included in the Million Death Study. This study collected information on deaths in 2001–03 and 2004–14, based on the 1991 and 2001 censuses, respectively. Every 6 months during the study period, 900 trained non-medical RGI surveyors investigated each death by interviewing a household member of the deceased using a modified WHO verbal autopsy questionnaire.9 The structured questionnaire captures awareness of any previous physician-diagnosed condition such as heart disease and stroke, and in 2004 we modified the questionnaire to include medication use. The verbal autopsy also includes a standard list of cardinal symptoms for the interviewer to elicit a chronological narrative of events preceding the death, written in the local language. Two trained physicians are randomly selected to review each questionnaire from those who read the relevant language, out of a pool of 400. Each independently determines the most probable underlying cause of death using an electronic interface. Each physician anonymously reviews the other physician’s diagnosis and rationale to reconcile initial differences. A third senior physician adjudicates persisting disagreements.

In this nationwide mortality study, we defined causes of death using strict guidelines and coding on the basis of the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (appendix).7 Myocardial infarction was defined as an episode of severe chest pain lasting between 30 min and 24 h with at least one additional symptom such as shortness of breath, vomiting, or left arm pain.10 Stroke death was defined as a sudden onset of paralysis of one or more limbs in the month preceding death in combination with at least one additional symptom, such as altered speech, loss of sensation, or loss of vision.10 Stroke could not be further categorised by subtype. These criteria are consistent with the international case definitions that endorse the use of verbal autopsy to classify cardiovascular deaths in settings without complete death registration and certification.11 The verbal autopsy yields results comparable to in-hospital vascular deaths.10 4043 (5%) of 84 625 deaths that occurred in 2002–03 were randomly reinvestigated by an independent team in 2004, and the results were highly consistent.9

Statistical analysis

We determined the age-specific proportion of deaths due to ischaemic heart disease and stroke among men and women for each year for 2001–13, weighted by the sampling probability of the rural and urban population for each state. We smoothed these proportions using 3-year centred moving averages and extrapolated to 2000 and 2014–15 using procedures described earlier.12 To derive age-standardised mortality rates for ischaemic heart disease and stroke, we applied these proportions to the national mortality rates reported by the UN Population Division (2000–15)13 and standardised rates to the WHO standard population.14 We then determined age-standardised mortality rates for rural, urban, and state populations by partitioning the national death totals using Sample Registration System vital statistics.8 We defined adult men and women as those aged 15 years or older. We excluded a small proportion of children younger than 15 years who died from cardiovascular disease.

Because of the large sample size of the Million Death Study, uncertainty is mostly attributable to cause of death assignment rather than to random error.9 We therefore estimated the influence of coding differences by assigning lower and upper bounds for estimates of mortality rate. The lower bound included deaths initially assigned to the same category by both physicians, whereas the upper bound included deaths initially assigned to a category by either one or both physicians. To estimate the effect of ill-defined causes of death (appendix), we redistributed ill-defined deaths proportionally to other causes for each 5-year age group. We derived average age-standardised annual mortality rates at ages 30–69 years by state among men and women for 2001–04 and 2011–13 and examined the association using linear correlation, weighted by population size. Because stroke mortality varied considerably across states, we separately analysed the subgroup of high-burden states (ie, those with high stroke mortality); all other states were classified as low burden (appendix). We then estimated the annual percentage change of age-standardised and age-specific mortality rates for 2001–15 using the age-period-cohort method (appendix). We computed rate ratios of age-specific mortality rates in each 5-year birth cohort and 5-year calendar period relative to the median birth cohort (1961–65) and calendar period (2005–10), respectively. We used SAS version 9.4 and R version 3.3.2 for analyses, and ArcMap version 10.5 for maps.

Role of the funding source

The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Results

We examined 472 113 deaths of individuals older than 15 years from 2001 to 2013, including 111 977 deaths due to cardiovascular disease (68 904 [61·5%] adult men and 43 073 [38·5%] women; appendix). Cardiovascular disease caused more than 2·1 million deaths in India in 2015 at all ages, or over a quarter of all deaths (table 1). Total cardiovascular deaths comprised 1·3 million cardiovascular deaths at ages 30–69 years: 0·9 million (68·4%) from ischaemic heart disease, 0·4 million (28·0%) from stroke, and 47 000 (3·5%) from rheumatic heart diseases and other cardiovascular diseases. Between 2000 and 2015, the national age-standardised mortality rate from ischaemic heart disease increased among men and women (figure 1, table 2), and the pattern was similar in most states. The highest rates in 2015 were in Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, and Tamil Nadu. In 2000, the age-standardised mortality rate of ischaemic heart disease at all ages in India was similar to high-income countries such as the UK. By 2015, in India these mortality rates rose to more than double those of the UK or USA.

Table 1. National and subnational cardiovascular death estimates for 2015 from the Million Death Study.

Male/female population in 2015 (millions) Ischaemic heart disease deaths (thousands) Stroke deaths (thousands) Other cardiovascular deaths (thousands) All cardiovascular deaths/all-cause deaths (thousands)




Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women
All ages

Study deaths, 2001–13     ··   44   22   23   18     3     2     69/270   43/202
National 680/632 878 488 374 314   54   51 1306/4487 852/3650

Age 30−69 years

National 274/260 613 295 218 157   26   22   857/2501 473/1653
High-burden stroke states   38/45   52   32   76   64     9     6   137/345 103/294
Low-burden stroke states 236/215 561 262 142   93   17   15   720/2156 370/1358
Rural areas 180/174 424 206 150 116   15   14   589/1844 337/1255
Urban areas   94/87 189   88   68   40   10     7   268/657 136/398

Numbers of cause-specific deaths were generated from study estimates. Subnational totals were adjusted to match national totals. Totals might not add up exactly because of rounding. Deaths in children younger than 15 years are excluded from totals because cardiovascular deaths are rare in this age group.

Figure 1. Secular trends in age-standardised mortality rates among men and women (aged ≥15 years), 2000–15.

Figure 1

Ischaemic heart disease in men (A) and women (B), and stroke in men (C) and women (D). All rates are standardised to the WHO population. Ischaemic heart disease and stroke deaths under age 15 years are rare and were excluded from MDS and GBD rates to ensure comparability. MDS=Million Death Study. GBD=Global Burden of Disease. Data for the UK and the USA are from the WHO Mortality Database;15 we forecasted these rates to 2015 for comparability.

Table 2. Age-standardised mortality rates for ischaemic heart disease and stroke (per 100 000 person years) for 2000–15 among men and women (aged ≥15 years).

Ischaemic heart disease
Stroke
Men
Women
Men
Women
2000 2015 2000 2015 2000 2015 2000 2015
All ages

National (lower, upper bounds*) 155 (110, 179) 173 (153, 195)   85 (55, 104)   96 (81, 109)   98 (73, 101)   80 (66, 82)   93 (71, 97)   63 (53, 65)

Age 30–69 years

Period risk   10·4%   13·1%     4·8%     6·6%     5·7%     5·0%     5·0%     3·9%
National 199 245   88 121 102   88   85   66
High-burden stroke states 156 160   78   85 161 227 137 157
Low-burden stroke states 208 262   90 135   92   66   76   45
Rural areas 181 255   81 127 102   91   85   71
Urban areas 283 234 116 123 110   88   87   55

All rates are weighted by sampling probability and standardised to the WHO population.

*

Bounds are defined as estimates including only deaths immediately assigned to the same cause of death category by two physicians (lower bound), and deaths immediately assigned to the cause of death category by only one physician (upper bound).

Period risk is the probability of cause-specific death if no other causes of death occurred. The age-specific period risk is calculated by multiplying the mortality rate by the duration of the age range. The period risk for ages 30–69 years is the cumulative total of the age-specific period risks.

By contrast, the age-standardised mortality rates at all ages for stroke fell among men and women during the 15 years. The USA and UK showed similar downward trends in age-standardised stroke mortality at all ages, but the rates in India remained about three times higher throughout.

The subsequent analyses focus on mortality at ages 30–69 years as these deaths have less misclassification of causes than deaths at ages 70 years or older,9 and because they represent avoidable deaths of greater public health importance.16 The geographical distribution of stroke mortality rates varied more than did ischaemic heart disease mortality rates (figure 2). A third of premature stroke deaths occurred in a small cluster of states and union territories representing about a sixth of India’s population. High-burden states for male stroke deaths were Assam, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, and the northeast states (ie, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and Meghalaya), and high-burden states for female stroke deaths were Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, and the northeastern states.

Figure 2. Geographical distribution of cause-specific mortality rate among men and women aged 30–69 years, 2001–04 and 2010–13.

Figure 2

Ischaemic heart disease (A) and stroke (B). All rates are standardised to the WHO population. Northeastern states include Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and Meghalaya. AP=Andhra Pradesh. AS=Assam. BR=Bihar. CH=Chandigarh. CG=Chhattisgarh. DD=Daman and Diu. DN=Dadra and Nagar Haveli. DL=Delhi. GA=Goa. GJ=Gujarat. HP=Himachal Pradesh. HR=Haryana. JH=Jharkhand. JK=Jammu and Kashmir. KA=Karnataka. KL=Kerala. MH=Maharashtra. MP=Madhya Pradesh. OD=Odisha. PB=Punjab. PY=Pondicherry. RJ=Rajasthan. TN=Tamil Nadu. UK=Uttarakhand. UP=Uttar Pradesh. WB=West Bengal. *Lower-income states, where about half of India’s population reside.

In these states, stroke mortality increased significantly and were about three times higher than the national average. At ages 30–69 years, stroke mortality comprised about three-fifths of all cardiovascular deaths in states with a high burden of stroke versus about a quarter of all cardiovascular deaths in the remaining low-burden states (table 1). The proportion of cardiovascular deaths to all deaths at these ages was higher in the states with a high burden of stroke than in the low-burden states.

Stroke mortality rates at ages 30–69 years fell in low-burden states. However, stroke mortality rates increased or did not change substantially in high-burden states in men and women (figure 3). States with high stroke mortality rates had low mortality rates of ischaemic heart disease and vice versa (appendix).

Figure 3. Cause-specific mortality rate in 2010–13 versus 2001–04 among men and women aged 30–69 years, by state.

Figure 3

Ischaemic heart disease among men (A) and women (B), and stroke among men (C) and women (D). Rates are standardised to the WHO population. The area of each circle is proportional to the state population (2010). The dotted line represents equality, so circles above this line indicate a relative increase and vice versa. AS, BR, JH, MP, OD, RJ, and UP are lower-income states, where about half of India’s population lives. States and union territories with a population of less than 26 million people are suppressed for clarity (appendix). We excluded Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Uttarakhand, Daman and Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Goa, Lakshadweep, Pondicherry, and Adaman and Nicobar Islands because of sparse data. AP=Andhra Pradesh. AS=Assam. BR=Bihar. GJ=Gujarat. JH=Jharkhand. KA=Karnataka. KL=Kerala. MH=Maharashtra. MP=Madhya Pradesh. NE=Northeastern states (Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, and Meghalaya). OD=Odisha. PB=Punjab. RJ=Rajasthan. TN=Tamil Nadu. UP=Uttar Pradesh. WB=West Bengal.

At ages 30–69 years, the probability of dying from ischaemic heart disease (in the absence of other causes) between 2000 and 2015 increased from 10·4% to 13·1% in men and from 4·8 to 6·6% in women. By contrast, the probability of dying from stroke fell marginally from 5·7% to 5·0% in men and 5·0% to 3·9% in women (table 2).

To further explore these results, we examined rural and urban differences and age-specific trends, and did age-period cohort analyses. Although ischaemic heart disease mortality at ages 30–69 years was lower in rural areas compared with urban areas at the start of the study, rural rates rose rapidly, surpassing urban rates by 2015 in both sexes (figure 4). Stroke mortality at ages 30–69 years in the high-burden states also rose more sharply in rural than in urban areas in both sexes. In states with a low burden of stroke, stroke mortality rates fell more rapidly in urban than rural areas in both sexes.

Figure 4. Secular trends in age-standardised mortality rates among men and women aged 30–69 years, by residence, 2000–15.

Figure 4

Ischaemic heart disease (A) and stroke in high-burden (B) and low-burden states (C). All rates are standardised to the WHO population.

From 2000 to 2015, age-specific mortality rates increased among middle-aged adults for ischaemic heart disease nationally and for stroke in high-burden states, and age-specific mortality trends for stroke declined in the low-burden states (appendix). Age-period cohort analysis showed that the maximum increase for ischaemic heart disease mortality for men was 2·4% annually (95% CI 2·0–2·8) in those aged 50–54 years and for women was 2·8% (1·6–3·9 in those aged 35–39 years; appendix). The relative risk of ischaemic heart disease mortality increased with each successive birth cohort among men, with the highest increases among the most recent birth cohorts for both sexes (appendix). Compared with women born in the 1960s, women born in the late 1970s had a relative risk of 1·42 (95% CI 1·25–1·60; excess mortality 42%), whereas among men, the relative risk was 1·30 (1·21–1·40; excess mortality 30%). In the high-burden states, age-standardised stroke mortality rates rose by 5·4% (4·8–6·0) per year among men and 1·5% (0·8–2·3) per year among women, peaking at ages 40–49 years. Men born in the 1980s had a relative risk of 3·42 (2·53–4·62). In the low-burden states, age-standardised stroke mortality fell by 1·5% (95% CI 1·0–2·1) per year and 2·7% (2·1–3·4) per year among men and women, respectively, with nadirs at 55–59 years of age. In these states, Indians born after 1960 had about half the risk of dying from stroke versus those born in the 1930s.

The proportion of those dying of ischaemic heart disease with a diagnosis of pre-existing heart disease rose in both sexes between 2001 and 2013 (figure 5, appendix). At least half of these individuals were taking no regular medications (54·1% of men and 50·4% of women in 2013, with 22·2% and 22·8%, respectively, reporting unknown medication status). In high-burden states, the proportion of stroke deaths with a history of pre-existing stroke further increased in both sexes, and the majority of these individuals were taking no medications (56·6% of men and 60·1% of women in 2013, with 23·3% and 24·0%, respectively, reporting unknown medication status). In states with a low burden of stroke, little change occurred in the proportion of individuals who died of stroke and reported a history of stroke, but a substantial portion of those individuals were taking no medications before death (47·7% among men and 48·2% among women in 2013, with 16·1% and 15·4%, respectively, reporting unknown medication status). Missing data were minimal (2·7% for medication status, ≤0·05% for all other variables).

Figure 5. Secular trends in the proportion of men and women aged 30–69 years with known pre-existing disease dying of ischaemic heart disease or stroke, 2001–13.

Figure 5

Ischaemic heart disease in men (A) and women (B), and stroke in high-burden states in men (C) and women (D) and low-burden states in men (E) and women (F). The shaded areas represent proportions overlaid onto age-standardised mortality rates (per 100 000 population). All rates are standardised to the WHO population.

Discussion

Ischaemic heart disease mortality is rising in India, more in rural than urban areas, with the greatest increases in young adults—especially those born after 1970. Nationally, decreases in stroke deaths were small, but this masks a previously undocumented cluster of high stroke mortality in northeast India with entirely different trends over time than the rest of the country. A large and growing proportion of the ischaemic heart disease and stroke deaths in high-burden states reported earlier diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, but low medication use.

Although mostly documented in high-income countries, established cardiovascular risk factors might account for the urban–rural variations in ischaemic heart disease and stroke, and the comparatively high cardiovascular mortality rates in India. Every 20 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure doubles the risk of cardiovascular mortality.17 The rural prevalence of hypertension has reportedly increased to match the urban prevalence,18 and this increase could be one factor driving the observed urban–rural differences in mortality rates. Smokers have large excesses of fatal and non-fatal ischaemic heart disease and stroke,19,20 and men who are illiterate and reside in rural areas are increasingly likely to smoke manufactured cigarettes as opposed to locally grown beedis.21 Smoking cessation rates in middle age are far below those of high-income countries.21 Hence, although not directly studied here, smoking is a major determinant of the age and region specific variation in cardiovascular disease rates. Although diabetes is increasing more rapidly in urban than rural areas,22 the rates of untreated diabetes in rural versus urban areas are still not known. In Mexico, the risks of cardiovascular death from diabetes (which is mostly untreated or undertreated), was much higher than the risks from diabetes in high-income countries (which is mostly treated).23 Thus, reduced quality, availability, and accessibility of secondary treatment in rural areas might play an important part in the observed rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular mortality.24

The role of other established risk factors in India is less clear. In high-income countries, increased body-mass index (BMI) increases ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality among obese individuals.25 However, evidence from high-income countries might not be generalisable to the unique Indian phenotype of central obesity. A low BMI might paradoxically predict increased mortality in India for unknown reasons.26 Further research is required to confirm how obesity and other established risk factors affect cardiovascular mortality in India. Evidence suggests that high-carbohydrate diets increase ischaemic heart disease risk,27 although carbohydrate intake has remained relatively stable in rural and urban areas.2

Furthermore, the risk factors driving ischaemic heart disease mortality might differ from those affecting stroke in high-burden states. Northeastern states have substantial populations of Sino-Tibetan ethnicity,22 and these populations might resemble the Chinese and Mongolian populations in which stroke dominates ischaemic heart disease. The incidence of haemorrhagic stroke appears to be particularly high among the Chinese population,6 and hypertension is the primary risk factor for this subtype. Although dietary factors, such as excessive salt intake, might increase hypertension prevalence in northeastern states,28 hypertension prevalence varies substantially across high-burden states. Inadequate stroke care might have a role in increasing mortality rates,6 and novel risk factors such as endemic infections might also be associated with stroke in these areas.6

On current trends, the UN Sustainable Development Goal to reduce cardiovascular mortality rates at ages 30–69 years by a third by 2030 is unlikely to be met without substantial progress in India. Moreover, ischaemic heart disease rates in Mexico and China also rose between 2000 and 2015.1 Modelled estimates by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) for India propose higher ischaemic heart disease mortality but lower stroke mortality than our observed rates.29 The GBD has been criticised on the basis of the assumptions required to generate cause-specific cardiovascular mortality rates for more than 70% of global populations for whom no such data exist. Moreover, the GBD reclassifies ill-defined causes of death as ischaemic heart disease. The 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems code I69—one of the most common stroke codes—is also reclassified into various causes including ischaemic heart disease. This classification might lead to the overestimation of ischaemic heart disease mortality rates and the underestimation of stroke mortality rates (appendix).

Our findings suggest that a large agenda for secondary treatment remains in India. Cheap, generic statins reduce cardiovascular mortality by 15% for every 1 mmol/L of LDL cholesterol lowered.30 Although statin sales might be increasing,31 our finding of low reported medication use is consistent with previous estimates that less than 10% of Indians with cardiovascular disease use statins regularly. 31,32 Effective long-term management of diabetes and hypertension is similarly lacking, particularly in rural areas.18,33 Use of the polypill—a combination of generic aspirin, antihypertensive, and statin combined into one pill—is a widely practicable strategy for India.34 Smoking cessation rates remain low,21 and many quit smoking as a consequence of rather than to avoid cardiovascular disease. However, most health services in India are not set up to capture patients with cardiovascular disease or to manage established risk factors.35

This is the first nationally representative study to measure cardiovascular mortality in India. Verbal autopsy remains the only feasible method of defining probable causes of death occurring at home, and without medical attention in most low-income and middle-income countries,36 we used this important tool to uncover the most complete picture of longitudinal mortality trends to date. However, some limitations exist. First, clinical autopsy and medical imaging were not available to confirm cause of death or stroke subtype. Nevertheless, the verbal autopsy is a widely used, validated, and reliable instrument for classifying ischaemic heart disease and stroke deaths in India.9,10 Further research is required to confirm whether haemorrhagic stroke has decreased in low-burden states as it has in other countries,37 and to assess whether increases in ischaemic heart disease mortality might preclude the occurrence of stroke mortality as a competing risk. In our data, only a minority of individuals who died of ischaemic heart disease reported previous stroke (appendix). Second, we had only crude data on medication use and were unable to access medical records to verify whether the drugs used were for cardiovascular disease, which would suggest that the extent of secondary treatment is quite low in India.30,35 Further research is required to better characterise the use of secondary prevention among those with cardiovascular disease.

This study has shown that cardiovascular mortality in India shows unexpected patterns that have not been well characterised previously. In less than two decades, ischaemic heart disease mortality in rural India has surged and surpassed urban levels, whereas stroke mortality has diverged across geographical areas. The National Rural Health Mission and the National Program for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke play a vital part in improving risk factor management and secondary prevention to reduce cardiovascular mortality. Improvement and sustaining of these programmes are needed to collect local evidence that will lead to the understanding of how established and novel risk factors operate in India to produce these distinctive epidemiological patterns.

Supplementary Material

Appendix

Research in context.

Evidence before this study

We searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles on the adult population of India published from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 6, 2017, using the search terms “exp India/ep” and “exp Cardiovascular Diseases/mo” in MEDLINE, and “exp India/ep”, “exp cardiovascular disease/”, and “exp mortality/ or exp premature mortality/” in Embase, with no language restrictions. We identified 18 studies measuring cardiovascular mortality, most of which were hospital based and none of which were nationally representative.

Added value of this study

This is the first nationally representative study to measure cardiovascular mortality in India, providing the most complete picture of longitudinal mortality trends to date. In less than two decades, ischaemic heart disease mortality in rural India has surged and surpassed that of urban areas, whereas stroke mortality has diverged across geographical areas.

Stroke mortality is increasing in a small cluster of high-burden states in the northeastern region of India, representing a sixth of the country’s population, yet accounting for a third of total stroke deaths. We uncovered a large secondary prevention target for ischaemic heart disease and stroke: most deaths were among individuals with previously known cardiovascular disease, and at least half were not taking any regular medications.

Implications of all the available evidence

Cardiovascular mortality in India shows unexpected patterns that have not been well characterised previously. Despite uncertainties about the causes that account for the marked divergence between ischaemic heart disease and stroke, and between stroke patterns in different regions, a large proportion of Indians with pre-existing cardiovascular disease are presently untreated and would benefit from secondary prevention and smoking cessation. Without progress in India against cardiovascular disease, the Sustainable Development Goals to reduce cardiovascular disease and non-communicable disease mortality by 2030 will be difficult to achieve.

Acknowledgments

The Registrar General of India established the Sample Registration System in 1971, has continued it ever since, and is collaborating with several of the authors. The academic partners in India planned the Million Death Study in close collaboration with the Office of the Registrar General of India. External funding is from the Fogarty International Center of the US National Institutes of Health (R01 TW05991–01), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Indian Council of Medical Research, and the Disease Control Priorities (funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). PJ is supported by the Canada Research Chair Program and the University of Toronto. CK is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Graduate Scholarship, the University of Toronto Clinician Investigator Program, and the Detweiler Traveling Fellowship funded by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. YVK is a Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance Fellow in public health. We thank Hellen Gelband for her useful comments. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Government of India.

Footnotes

Contributors

CK searched the literature. CK and WS analysed the data. CK, RG, YVK, and PJ wrote the paper. PK generated the maps. PJ conceived the Million Death Study. All authors were involved with data interpretation, critical revisions of the paper, and approval of the final version.

Declaration of interests

DX reports grants from Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi Aventis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and United Health outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Calvin Ke, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Global Health Research, St Michael’s Hospital, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Rajeev Gupta, Academic Research Development Unit, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Prof Denis Xavier, St John’s Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.

Prof Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Prashant Mathur, National Centre for Diseases Informatics & Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, India.

Yogeshwar V Kalkonde, Society for Education, Action and Research in Community Health, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, India.

References

  • 1.WHO. Global health estimates 2015: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular diseases in India. Circulation. 2016;133:1605–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pednekar MS, Gupta R, Gupta PC. Illiteracy, low educational status, and cardiovascular mortality in India. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:567. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soman CR, Kutty VR, Safraj S, et al. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in Kerala state of India results from a 5-year follow-up of 161 942 rural community dwelling adults. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011;23:896–903. doi: 10.1177/1010539510365100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gupta R, Mohan I, Narula J. Trends in coronary heart disease epidemiology in India. Ann Glob Health. 2016;82:307–15. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Banerjee TK, Das SK. Fifty years of stroke researches in India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016;19:1. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.168631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gomes M, Begum R, Sati P, et al. Nationwide mortality studies to quantify causes of death: relevant lessons from India’s million death study. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36:1887–95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. SRS statistical report 2015. [accessed Jan 14, 2018]; http://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Reports_ 2015.html.
  • 9.Aleksandrowicz L, Malhotra V, Dikshit R, et al. Performance criteria for verbal autopsy-based systems to estimate national causes of death: development and application to the Indian Million Death Study. BMC Med. 2014;12:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumar R, Thakur JS, Rao BT, Singh MMC, Bhatia SPS. Validity of verbal autopsy in determining causes of adult deaths. Indian J Public Health. 2006;50:90–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luepker RV, Apple FS, Christenson RH, et al. Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: a statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation. 2003;108:2543–49. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100560.46946.EA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fadel SA, Rasaily R, Awasthi S, et al. Changes in cause-specific neonatal and 1–59-month child mortality in India from 2000 to 2015: a nationally representative survey. Lancet. 2017;390:1972–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32162-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. World population prospects: 2015 revision. New York: United Nations Population Division; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.WHO. WHO Mortality Database. [accessed Jan 23, 2018];2016 Dec; http://apps.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/mortality/whodpms/
  • 16.Norheim OF, Jha P, Admasu K, et al. Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010–30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN Sustainable Development Goal for health. Lancet. 2015;385:239–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61591-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta R. Convergence in urban–rural prevalence of hypertension in India. J Hum Hypertens. 2016;30:79–82. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rastogi T, Jha P, Reddy KS, et al. Bidi and cigarette smoking and risk of acute myocardial infarction among males in urban India. Tob Control. 2005;14:356–58. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jha P, Jacob B, Gajalakshmi V, et al. A nationally representative case-control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1137–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0707719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mishra S, Joseph RA, Gupta PC, et al. Trends in bidi and cigarette smoking in India from 1998 to 2015, by age, gender and education. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1:e000005. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anjana RM, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes in 15 states of India: results from the ICMR–INDIAB population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:585–96. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30174-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alegre-Díaz J, Herrington W, López-Cervantes M, et al. Diabetes and cause-specific mortality in Mexico City. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1961–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, et al. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:818–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.The Global BMI Mortality Collaboration. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388:776–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gajalakshmi V, Lacey B, Kanimozhi V, Sherliker P, Peto R, Lewington S. Body-mass index, blood pressure, and cause-specific mortality in India: a prospective cohort study of 500 810 adults. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e787–94. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30267-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dehghan M, Mente A, Zhang X, et al. Associations of fats and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 18 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390:2050–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32252-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National family health survey 4: 2015–16. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (Deemed University); 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Global Health Data Exchange. GBD results tool. [accessed Jan 23, 2018]; http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool.
  • 30.Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Choudhry NK, Dugani S, Shrank WH, et al. Despite increased use and sales of statins in India, per capita prescription rates remain far below high-income countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:273–82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murphy A, Palafox B, O’Donnell O, et al. Inequalities in the use of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease by socioeconomic status: evidence from the PURE observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e292–301. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30031-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Unnikrishnan R, Anjana RM, Deepa M, et al. Glycemic control among individuals with self-reported diabetes in India—the ICMR–INDIAB study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16:596–603. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huffman MD, Xavier D, Perel P. Uses of polypills for cardiovascular disease and evidence to date. Lancet. 2017;389:1055–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30553-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xavier D, Pais P, Devereaux PJ, et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in India (CREATE): a prospective analysis of registry data. Lancet. 2008;371:1435–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60623-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jha P. Reliable direct measurement of causes of death in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med. 2014;12:19. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lawlor DA, Smith GD, Leon DA, Sterne JA, Ebrahim S. Secular trends in mortality by stroke subtype in the 20th century: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2002;360:1818–23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11769-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

RESOURCES