Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2019 Dec 22;48(D1):D1–D8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1161

The 27th annual Nucleic Acids Research database issue and molecular biology database collection

Daniel J Rigden 1,, Xosé M Fernández 2
PMCID: PMC6943072  PMID: 31906604

Abstract

The 2020 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue contains 148 papers spanning molecular biology. They include 59 papers reporting on new databases and 79 covering recent changes to resources previously published in the issue. A further ten papers are updates on databases most recently published elsewhere. This issue contains three breakthrough articles: AntiBodies Chemically Defined (ABCD) curates antibody sequences and their cognate antigens; SCOP returns with a new schema and breaks away from a purely hierarchical structure; while the new Alliance of Genome Resources brings together a number of Model Organism databases to pool knowledge and tools. Major returning nucleic acid databases include miRDB and miRTarBase. Databases for protein sequence analysis include CDD, DisProt and ELM, alongside no fewer than four newcomers covering proteins involved in liquid–liquid phase separation. In metabolism and signaling, Pathway Commons, Reactome and Metabolights all contribute papers. PATRIC and MicroScope update in microbial genomes while human and model organism genomics resources include Ensembl, Ensembl genomes and UCSC Genome Browser. Immune-related proteins are covered by updates from IPD-IMGT/HLA and AFND, as well as newcomers VDJbase and OGRDB. Drug design is catered for by updates from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology and the Therapeutic Target Database. The entire Database Issue is freely available online on the Nucleic Acids Research website (https://academic.oup.com/nar). The NAR online Molecular Biology Database Collection has been revised, updating 305 entries, adding 65 new resources and eliminating 125 discontinued URLs; so bringing the current total to 1637 databases. It is available at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/nar/database/c/.

NEW AND UPDATED DATABASES

The year 2020 sees the Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue reach its 27th annual issue. As usual, the 148 papers included span the full range of biological research. This year there are papers on 59 new databases (Table 1) while 79 resources provide Update papers covering recent developments. A further 10 papers cover updates of databases most recently published elsewhere (Table 2). The issue begins with reports from the major database providers at the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) and the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) in China, a new venture encompassing the previously published Beijing Institute of Genomics Data Center. Further papers are grouped in the now-familiar fashion: (i) nucleic acid sequence and structure, transcriptional regulation; (ii) protein sequence and structure; (iii) metabolic and signaling pathways, enzymes and networks; (iv) genomics of viruses, bacteria, protozoa and fungi; (v) genomics of human and model organisms plus comparative genomics; (vi) human genomic variation, diseases and drugs; (vii) plants and (viii) other topics, such as proteomics databases. As ever, the discipline-spanning nature of many modern resources means that readers are encouraged to browse the whole issue. The Nucleic Acids Research online Molecular Biology Database Collection, classifies databases more finely using 15 categories and 41 subcategories, and can be found at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/nar/database/c/.

Table 1.

Descriptions of new databases in the 2020 NAR Database issue

Database Name URL Short description
ABCD https://web.expasy.org/abcd AntiBodies chemically defined
Alliance of Genome Resources https://www.alliancegenome.org Data united across model organisms
Animal-ImputeDB http://gong_lab.hzau.edu.cn/Animal_ImputeDB Reference panels and imputation methods for animal genomes
APAatlas https://hanlab.uth.edu/apa Human alternative polyadenylation
BacFITBase http://www.tartaglialab.com/bacfitbase/ Bacterial genes relevant to host infection
BBCancer http://bbcancer.renlab.org Blood-based biomarkers for cancer
CancerGeneNet https://signor.uniroma2.it/CancerGeneNet Paths from cancer mutations to ‘Hallmark phenotypes’
CancerTracer http://cailab.labshare.cn/cancertracer Tumor heterogeneity in individual patients
CausalDB http://mulinlab.tmu.edu.cn/causaldb Predicted causal variants from GWAS
CFEA www.bio-data.cn/CFEA Cell-free epigenome atlas
ChlamDB https://www.chlamdb.ch Comparative genomics of the Chlamydiae phylum and the PVC superphylum
CRISPRCasdb https://crisprcas.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr CRISPR arrays and Cas proteins
DNMIVD http://www.unimd.org/dnmivd DNA methylation and cancer
DrLLPS http://llps.biocuckoo.cn Liquid–liquid phase separation of proteins
DrugCombDB http://drugcombdb.denglab.org Drug combination data
ENdb http://www.licpathway.net/ENdb Experimentally supported enhances in human and mouse
EuRBPDB http://EuRBPDB.syshospital.org Eukaryotic RNA binding proteins
EWAS Data Hub http://bigd.big.ac.cn/ewas/datahub DNA methylation array data and metadata
ExonSkipDB https://ccsm.uth.edu/ExonSkipDB Exon skipping
FoldamerDB http://foldamerdb.ttk.mta.hu Peptidic foldamers
Gene4Denovo http://genemed.tech/gene4denovo Human de novo mutations
Genus http://genus.fuw.edu.pl Topological characteristics of biomolecular structures
Gephebase https://www.gephebase.org Genotype–phenotype relationships in eukaryotes
GMrepo https://gmrepo.humangut.info Human gut metagenomics data
gutMDisorder http://bio-annotation.cn/gutMDisorder Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota
GWAS Atlas http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwas GWAS studies across seven plants and two animals
KnockTF http://www.licpathway.net/KnockTF Gene expression following TF knockdown/knockout
LLPSDB http://bio-comp.ucas.ac.cn/LLPSDB Liquid–liquid phase separation of proteins
LnCeVar http://www.bio-bigdata.net/LnCeVar lncRNA SNPs affecting ceRNA action
LncTarD http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/LncTarD lncRNA-mediated regulatory mechanisms and disease
MaGenDB http://magen.whu.edu.cn Functional genomics hub of Malvaceae eg cotton, cacao
malaria.tools http://malaria.tools Plasmodium co-expression and co-function networks
MBKbase http://www.mbkbase.org Plant Molecular Breeding Knowledgebase
ncRNA-eQTL http://ibi.hzau.edu.cn/ncRNA-eQTL eQTL analysis of ncRNAs
OGRDB https://ogrdb.airr-community.org Open germline receptor database
oRNAment http://rnabiology.ircm.qc.ca/oRNAment Predicted RBP binding sites in complete transcriptomes
PADS Arsenal http://bigd.big.ac.cn/padsarsenal Prokaryotic antiviral defense systems
PathBank http://www.pathbank.org Pathways in model organisms
PGG.Han http://www.pgghan.org or https://www.hanchinesegenomes.org Han Chinese genomes
PhaSepDB http://db.phasep.pro Phase separation related proteins
PhaSepPro http://phasepro.elte.hu Phase separation related proteins
PhenoModifier https://www.biosino.org/PhenoModifier Genetic modifiers of human disorders
PDBe-KB http://pdbe-kb.org Structural and functional annotations of the PDB
PmiREN http://www.pmiren.com Plant MicroRNA Encyclopedia
Pro-Carb http://structure.bioc.cam.ac.uk/procarb Protein–carbohydrate interactions
QTLbase http://mulinlab.org/qtlbase Quantitative Trait Loci across human phenotypes
SEAweb http://sea.ims.bio Small RNA Expression Atlas
snoDB http://scottgroup.med.usherbrooke.ca/snoDB Human snoRNAs
SNP2APA http://gong_lab.hzau.edu.cn/SNP2APA SNPs and alternative polyadenylation in cancer
SpatialDB https://spatialomics.org/SpatialDB/ Spatially resolved transcriptome
SyntDB http://syntdb.amu.edu.pl lncRNAs and their evolutionary relationships in primates
TerrestrialMetagenomeDB https://webapp.ufz.de/tmdb Terrestrial metagenome metadata
Thera-SAbDab http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/webapps/therasabdab Therapeutic antibodies
T-psi-C http://tpsic.igcz.poznan.pl Experimentally determined tRNA sequences
TSEA-DB https://bioinfo.uth.edu/TSEADB Tissue specificity of GWAS traits and phenotypes
VARIDT https://db.idrblab.org/varidt Variability of Drug Transporter Database
VDJbase https://www.VDJbase.org Genotype and haplotype data from AIRR sequencing
VISDB https://bioinfo.uth.edu/VISDB/index.php Virus Integration Site DataBase
YEASTRACT+ http://yeastract-plus.org Transcription regulation in yeasts

Table 2.

Updated descriptions of databases most recently published elsewhere

Database Name URL Short description
DNAproDB https://dnaprodb.usc.edu DNA–protein complex structure analysis
EnhancerAtlas http://www.enhanceratlas.org/indexv2.php Enhancers in nine species
GWAS Central https://www.gwascentral.org GWAS datasets
MatrisomeDB http://matrisome.org Extracellular matrix components
MIBiG https://mibig.secondarymetabolites.org Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of Known Function
MirGeneDB www.mirgenedb.org Animal miRNA complements
MSDB http://data.ccmb.res.in/msdb Microsatellites from all sequenced genomes
Ohnologs http://ohnologs.curie.fr Vertebrate ohnologs
PolyASite http://www.polyasite.unibas.ch RNA polyadenylation sites
WALTZ-DB http://waltzdb.switchlab.org Amyloidogenic peptide sequences

Among the major global centers, the NCBI (1) reports updates across many databases and interfaces. For example, gene searches can now cleverly retrieve orthologs from (subsets of) vertebrates. The EBI paper (2) includes striking figures that illustrate the deep inter-connectedness of its hosted databases, as well as their myriad links to external resources. It also describes a significant new arrival, the BioImage Archive. The paper from the National Genomics Data Center (3) includes descriptions of their rapidly expanding suite of databases, some featured in detail elsewhere in this Issue. They report that their database for raw sequence reads, the Genome Sequence Archive, now occupies more than a petabyte.

In the ‘Nucleic acid databases’ section, major returning databases include miRTarBase (4), the database of experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions, offering a new focus on miRNA regulatory networks; and miRDB (5), the database of predicted miRNA target sites, here reporting an improved predictive algorithm and Gene Ontology-based miRNA function prediction. MirGeneDB (6), appearing in Nucleic Acids Research for the first time, takes an evolutionary approach to manually curate and classify miRNAs, and covers 45 representative metazoa. Elsewhere, LncBase indexes miRNA targets found on ncRNA transcripts, including consideration of sequence variants lying within miRNA binding sites (7). Two returning databases cover the interactions of RNA with other biomolecules more broadly. NPInter (8) covers ncRNA interactions and includes DNA and circRNA partners for the first time, while RNAInter (9), successor to the previously published RAID (10) now holds 8-fold more interaction data than before, and covers a notably wide range of RNAs and interacting molecules. The well-known database of transcription factor binding sites JASPAR (11) provides an Update paper that, interestingly, reports on a collection of unvalidated sites and mechanisms by which the user community can assist in their curation. TFBSshape (12) is another returning database of transcription factor binding sites but focuses on 3D DNA shape, which can change significantly on DNA methylation, as an important contributor to binding specificity. Gene expression data are covered by the well known Expression Atlas (13) which reports a new section for single cell gene expression as well as by the newcomer KnockTF (14) which reports the impact on expression of transcription factor knockout or knockdown experiments. Another new database SpatialDB (15) provides spatially resolved transcriptome data across 10 experimental methods and five species. With the arrival of snoDB (16), human snoRNA molecules—with important roles in directing RNA post-transcriptional modifications but increasingly suspected of a range of other functions—gain a new dedicated database. Finally, two new databases focus on alternative polyadenylation in human cells. APAatlas (17) majors on the tissue specificity of the process while SNP2APA (18) considers how the impact of SNPs on alternative polyadenylation links to cancer.

Two of the issue's Breakthrough articles are found in the section on protein sequence and structure databases. The ABCD (AntiBodies Chemically Defined) database (19) curates information about antibodies and their antigens, linking out to standard databases from each. One of the main drivers for the establishment of the database was experimental reproducibility since, as the authors note, poorly defined or batch-variable antibodies are a major issue (20). ABCD therefore assigns a unique identifier to each antibody sequence (represented by VL and VH chains) with a known antigen. With an eye to the sustainability of this curated database, and acknowledging the time-consuming nature of literature mining, the authors encourage submission of entries directly by colleagues in the field. Another valuable new database relating to antibodies Thera-SAbDab (21) links therapeutic antibody or nanobody sequences recognized by the World Health Organisation to entries in the authors’ structural antibody database SAbDab (22) for similar or identical proteins.

The second breakthrough article reports the return of the SCOP (Structural Classification of Proteins) resource after a number of years (23). The new iteration of the database adopts a simplified version of the schema published in prototype form in 2013 (24). At that time the original authors broke away from their original conception of a purely hierarchical database, although their original structure has since seen continued and very valuable maintenance by the SCOPe team (25). SCOPe continues to be highly used but there will be strong interest among the structural bioinformatics community in the new, more flexible relationships allowed by SCOP in 2020. The new version also includes definitions of intrinsically unstructured protein regions. These and the traditional folded domains are now placed into four protein types: soluble, membrane, fibrous and intrinsically disordered. While the database remains largely hierarchical, the authors illustrate the non-hierarchical relationships now usefully captured by the new schema. Another foundational resource in protein bioinformatics, the Conserved Domain Database (26), reports an update of its own hierarchical protein sequence family annotation framework. Elsewhere the major news is the arrival of no fewer than four databases devoted to proteins involved in liquid–liquid phase separation (27–30). These proteins form the basis of membraneless organelles/condensates (31), which are found in various cellular compartments and whose dysfunction is increasingly linked to disease (32). Better known classes of protein are covered in the returning DisProt (33), for protein intrinsic disorder and WALTZ-DB (34) for amyloidogenic protein sequences. Elsewhere the regular PDBe update (35) reports on improved search methods, enhanced links to other databases for eg RNA molecules, and better identification of cofactors. A new associated database PDBe-KB (36) offers annotations of PDB deposits from an impressive array of 18 partner resources, many familiar to readers of the NAR Database and Webserver Issues. With notably stylish and intuitive presentation, PDBe-KB pages offer an efficient way to browse functional features of a protein structure of interest.

A number of major pathway databases contribute updated papers to the metabolic and signaling section. They include Pathway Commons (37) which integrates data from a large number of pathway and interaction databases. The developers report, however, that few of them are currently funded and so, in order to address the rapidly growing literature, a curation support tool is planned to allow authors to submit summaries of their new papers for curation. Reactome reports its own Update (38) which also reports on efforts to engage the community in contributing to the resource, and includes a striking new Voronoi diagram browser to visualize pathways. A major new arrival in the area is PathBank (39) which aims to comprehensively catalog both metabolic and signaling pathways in model organisms. It too seeks community input and majors on pathway coverage and options for search, visualization and download of data. Metabolic and signaling models are the focus of two returning databases. BIGG Models (40) continues to expand its content of genome-scale metabolic models, including multi-strain models for the first time, and now links to a model validation tool. An updated paper from BioModels (41) reports content totalling around 2000 models. These are subject to targeted curation and the authors show that users strongly prefer curated models to uncurated. Future plans include acceptance of computer-submitted models and enabling storage and dissemination of multi-scale models. Signaling is the focus of two databases, MiST (42) returning after a decade's absence with a new interface to its cataloging of microbial signaling systems, proteins and domains, and SIGNOR (43) reporting a near doubling in size of its graph representations of information flow in eukaryotic cells, especially in human. The widely used MiBiG database (44) of biosynthetic gene clusters arrives in Nucleic Acids Research, reporting recent expansion from both community contributions and in-house efforts, and with improved links out to small molecule databases. In the same area, IMG/ABC (45) returns with v.5.0, exploiting recent improvements in the antiSMASH genome mining pipeline (46), and offering higher quality data covering more types of cluster. Finally, MetaboLights (47) reports an update after seven years away that shows a rapidly increasing submission rate. The paper includes a strong focus on the user experience, reporting not only improvements to the submission pipeline, but also a website redesign driven by usability testing.

The microbial genomics section contains a pair of returning resources that focus on antimicrobial resistance. The very popular CARD database (48) reports on the challenges of coping with processing 5000 papers a year in the area of antimicrobial resistance and, among other innovations, now includes computationally predicted resistome data. The MEGARes Update (49) shows how the inclusion of metal and biocide resistance determinants contributes to a near-doubling of size. An improved pipeline for computational annotation of the resistome of metagenomic samples is also described. The new database PADS Arsenal (50) covers Prokaryotic Antiviral Defense Systems of 18 different kinds across more than 30 000 prokaryotes. An impressive variety of visualizations and analytical tools are offered. CRISPRCasdb (51) is a new database which includes both CRISP arrays and Cas proteins and assigns system type and sub-type. Two general comparative genomics resources contribute Update articles. MicroScope (52) reports a number of new tools to annotate genes and genomic regions, aimed at prediction of properties such as function, essentiality, virulence and antibiotic resistance. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center paper (53) reports that 250 000 genomes are now covered. In accord with their focus on pathogens, antimicrobial resistance is a major topic, but they also report new analytical and visualization tools. Pathogen–host interactions are covered by both PHI-Base (54) which reports a big expansion and increased use of its annotations by other databases; and the significant new arrival BacFITBase (55) which applies a standardized reprocessing to published data to enable assessment of how important genes from 15 pathogenic bacteria are to infection of five vertebrate hosts. The major metagenomics platform MGnify (55) (formerly EBI Metagenomics) has an update that describes improvements to its assembly and analysis pipeline, the introduction of a new system of unique and stable accession numbers, and the easy availability of a rapidly expanding MGnify protein sequence database which is usefully non-redundant with UniProtKB.

In the next section, there is again a strong presence from model organism (MO) databases. The Issue's third Breakthrough Article describes the new Alliance of Genome Resources (56). The Alliance is an important strategic effort to bring together the fruits of all the individual annotator expertise employed at the contributing MO resources. At their portal a user can search for a gene from a favorite MO and receive expression, phenotype and orthology information from across all the contributing MOs. Ribbon representations show, for example, Gene Ontology and disease associations across orthologous genes. One particularly clever feature is the automated gene description which produces a human-readable summary optimally summarizing the ontology terms relating to a gene in a text of a given length. Sensibly, the Alliance authors are seeking to share data models and computational pipelines across resources to facilitate the future sustainable integration of current and future database partners. The Alliance lies in similar territory to a previous Breakthrough paper recipient, the Monarch Initiative for linking genes, variants, genotypes, phenotypes and diseases across species. Here it reports (57) more covered species, more data sources, a new disease ontology and a new website. One particularly nifty new feature is the text annotation widget which marks up a tranche of text, such as a paper abstract, with links to ontologies that can be further explored. Among the Alliance's members contributing Updates are the Rat Genome Database (58), which fittingly celebrates its 20th anniversary in the Year of the Rat, the Saccharomyces Genome Database (59) and Wormbase (60). Returning after a decade's absence, SilkDB reports 3.0 (61) with a higher quality genome assembly, pangenome data to compare genome variants, tissue-level transcriptomics data and an impressively wide range of data representations. The cornerstone project Ensembl offers its usual Update (62) describing very significant improvements, including 94 new vertebrate genomes, new tools to annotate and visualize variants and better resources for epigenomic data. It is joined by its companion database Ensembl Genomes (63) for non-vertebrate genomics. This latter paper breaks the news that both will be accessible from a single website during 2020 as a reflection of the greater integration of the two projects that is seen as necessary to optimally process and display the results of megascale sequencing projects like the Earth BioGenome Project (64). Elsewhere, Ohnologs reports its v2 release (65). Whole genome duplication has played a significant role in vertebrate evolution especially, and the Ohnologs database focuses on those genes that are retained after duplication.

The large number of databases in human genomic variation, diseases and drugs include a number of returning major players. The big news from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology (66) is a new extension, the IUPHAR/MMV Guide to Malaria Pharmacology, a joint initiative with the Medicines for Malaria Venture and accessible through its own URL (www.guidetomalariapharmacology.org). The heavily used IPD-IMGT/HLA database (67) reports on continued strong growth in its content of named HLA alleles, while an update on the popular Allele Frequency Net Database (68), covering polymorphisms of several immune-related genes, describes a new categorization of HLA data into gold, silver and bronze quality categories revealing some global disparities in sampling. An important new arrival in the immunoinformatics field is VDJbase (69), designed specifically to store genotype and haplotype data for the results of adaptive immune receptor repertoire sequencing (AIRR-seq). Researchers are invited to submit their own datasets which will be validated, processed and deposited in the database. The returning database VDJdb (70) focuses on T-cell receptor sequences and their cognate antigens. It reports huge recent growth and an interface to assist with analysis of large datasets such as those deriving from AIRR-seq. Another significant new arrival in the area is OGRDB (71) a database of immune receptor germline sequences aiming to provide germline gene reference sets for proper interpretation of AIRR-seq data. Several databases that are either new or featuring here for the first time explore Genome-Wide Association Study data and its ability to pinpoint the genomic variability underlying traits and diseases. The paper from GWAS Central (72) describes how it covers nearly 4000 human studies, and plans to map between human and mouse data as the mouse can be used to validate human GWAS findings. The new GWAS Atlas (73), in contrast, focuses on plants and domesticated animals. Another new resource CausalDB (74) focuses on applying fine-mapping tools to try to sift true causal variants from GWAS data while TSEA-DB (75) offers an interesting tissue-specific view of GWAS traits and phenotypes. All efforts to link genome variation to phenotype benefit from complete and balanced representations of species diversity and so the arrival of the PGG.Han database (76) is welcome, focusing as it does on the Han Chinese, a group hitherto under-represented in population genomics data. Among resources for drug design it is worth highlighting the popular Therapeutic Target Database (77) which reports a number of new features including target regulators (both miRNA and TF), target-interacting proteins and information targets of patented therapeutic agents. TDR Targets (78) focuses particularly on drug design to address neglected tropical diseases and incorporates new data into a network representation to allow, for example, whole-genome target prioritization and exploration of drug repurposing. It also contributes a stylish cover image to this Issue. Two other heavily used databases, ClinVar (79) and DisGeNET (80) also contribute Updates, each featuring expanded content and a new web interface. As ever, cancer databases are well-represented with new contributions to the field including CancerTracer (81), a resource for studying and intrapatient tumor heterogeneity that features data from 1500 patients, including patient-specific tumor phylogenetic trees, and DNMIVD (82) which has a wide range of functions regarding links between DNA methylation and cancer.

A major returning plant database is PlantRegMap (83) which exploits the information in its associated database of plant transcription factor binding sites PlantTFDB to help predict the functional regulatory maps of dozens of plants. A single paper (84) reports updates to both AraPheno and AraGWAS Catalog databases that include RNA-Seq and knockout mutation data for the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana. The Malvaceae, which include such important crops as cotton and cacao gain their own dedicated functional genomics database MaGenDB (85) which includes over 300 diverse omics datasets and a customized genome browser. Also very much orientated toward agricultural purposes is MBKbase (86), a plant molecular breeding knowledgebase. It includes germplasm information and genomic, population sequencing, phenotypic and gene expression data.

The final section, with databases not easily lying within the earlier categories, contains the usual intriguing and eclectic mix. Proteomics research is covered by two major returning databases. ProteomeXchange (87) covers changes made at each of its member organizations, now—with the addition of iProX and Panorama Public—totaling six. ProteomicsDB (88)—which also encompasses diverse data such as gene expression and, in the new release, protein turnover information—now supports organisms other than the original human, with A. thaliana leading the way. The popular MatrisomeDB database (89) covering proteomics of the extracellular matrix is appearing here for the first time with a new version tripling the number of datasets of the original. Elsewhere, FoldamerDB (90) addresses peptidic foldamers, non-natural oligomers with defined solution structures that mimic the behavior of natural macromolecules and have potential in areas as diverse as antimicrobial therapy and materials science. Finally, the Genus database (91) contains calculations relating to the genus, a topological property, of all protein and RNA molecules in the PDB, also allowing analysis of structures uploaded by users.

NAR ONLINE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY DATABASE COLLECTION

For this 27th release of the NAR online Molecular Database Collection (as usual freely available at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/nar/database/c/), in our ongoing process to provide and up-to-date resource, over the last year we have updated 305 entries, added 65 new resources and deleted 125 discontinued databases, bringing the total collection to 1637 databases.

This is a never ending task, as once this publication sees the light, there may be listed resources going down which we will not detect until our next scheduled review during the year, at which point those database owners will be informed. Ignored requests or lack of action will result in databases listed as obsolete being deleted in future updates of the collection. We encourage authors to submit their updates to XMF at xose.m.fernandez@gmail.com in plain text, ideally according to the template found in http://www.oxfordjournals.org/nar/database/summary/1.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr Martine Bernardes-Silva, especially, and the rest of the Oxford University Press team led by Joanna Ventikos for their help in compiling this issue.

FUNDING

Funding for open access charge: Oxford University Press.

Conflict of interest statement. The authors' opinions do not necessarily reflect the views of their respective institutions.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Sayers E.W., Beck J., Brister J.R., Bolton E.E., Canese K., Comeau D.C., Funk K., Ketter A., Kim S., Kimchi A. et al.. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cook C.E., Stroe O., Cochrane G., Birney E., Apweiler R.. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2020: building a global infrastructure of interconnected data resources for the life sciences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. National Genomics Data Center Members and Partners Database Resources of the National genomics data center in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Huang H.-Y., Lin Y.-C.-D., Li J., Huang K.-Y., Shrestha S., Hong H.-C., Tang Y., Chen Y.-G., Jin C.-N., Yu Y. et al.. miRTarBase 2020: updates to the experimentally validated microRNA–target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chen Y., Wang X.. miRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fromm B., Domanska D., Høye E., Ovchinnikov V., Kang W., Aparicio-Puerta E., Johansen M., Flatmark K., Mathelier A., Hovig E. et al.. MirGeneDB 2.0: the metazoan microRNA complement. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Karagkouni D., Paraskevopoulou M.D., Tastsoglou S., Skoufos G., Karavangeli A., Pierros V., Zacharopoulou E., Hatzigeorgiou A.G.. DIANA-LncBase v3: indexing experimentally supported miRNA targets on non-coding transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Teng X., Chen X., Xue H., Tang Y., Zhang P., Kang Q., Hao Y., Chen R., Zhao Y., He S.. NPInter v4.0: an integrated database of ncRNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lin Y., Liu T., Cui T., Wang Z., Zhang Y., Tan P., Huang Y., Yu J., Wang D.. RNAInter in 2020: RNA interactome repository with increased coverage and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yi Y., Zhao Y., Li C., Zhang L., Huang H., Li Y., Liu L., Hou P., Cui T., Tan P. et al.. RAID v2.0: an updated resource of RNA-associated interactions across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45:D115–D118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fornes O., Castro-Mondragon J.A., Khan A., van der Lee R., Zhang X., Richmond P.A., Modi B.P., Correard S., Gheorghe M., Baranašić D. et al.. JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chiu T.-P., Xin B., Markarian N., Wang Y., Rohs R.. TFBSshape: an expanded motif database for DNA shape features of transcription factor binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Papatheodorou I., Moreno P., Manning J., Fuentes A.M.-P., George N., Fexova S., Fonseca N.A., Füllgrabe A., Green M., Huang N. et al.. Expression Atlas update: from tissues to single cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Feng C., Song C., Liu Y., Qian F., Gao Y., Ning Z., Wang Q., Jiang Y., Li Y., Li M. et al.. KnockTF: a comprehensive human gene expression profile database with knockdown/knockout of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fan Z., Chen R., Chen X.. SpatialDB: a database for spatially resolved transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bouchard-Bourelle P., Desjardins-Henri C., Mathurin-St-Pierre D., Deschamps-Francoeur G., Fafard-Couture É., Garant J.-M., Elela S.A., Scott M.S.. snoDB: an interactive database of human snoRNA sequences, abundance and interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hong W., Ruan H., Zhang Z., Ye Y., Liu Y., Li S., Jing Y., Zhang H., Diao L., Liang H. et al.. APAatlas: decoding alternative polyadenylation across human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yang Y., Zhang Q., Miao Y.-R., Yang J., Yang W., Yu F., Wang D., Guo A.-Y., Gong J.. SNP2APA: a database for evaluating effects of genetic variants on alternative polyadenylation in human cancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lima W.C., Gasteiger E., Marcatili P., Duek P., Bairoch A., Cosson P.. The ABCD database: a repository for chemically defined antibodies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Baker M. Reproducibility crisis: blame it on the antibodies. Nature. 2015; 521:274–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Raybould M.I.J., Marks C., Lewis A.P., Shi J., Bujotzek A., Taddese B., Deane C.M.. Thera-SAbDab: the Therapeutic Structural Antibody Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dunbar J., Krawczyk K., Leem J., Baker T., Fuchs A., Georges G., Shi J., Deane C.M.. SAbDab: the structural antibody database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D1140–D1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Andreeva A., Kulesha E., Gough J., Murzin A.G.. The SCOP database in 2020: expanded classification of representative family and superfamily domains of known protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Andreeva A., Howorth D., Chothia C., Kulesha E., Murzin A.G.. SCOP2 prototype: a new approach to protein structure mining. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D310–D314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fox N.K., Brenner S.E., Chandonia J.-M.. SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins—extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D304–D309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lu S., Wang J., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M.K., Geer R.C., Gonzales N.R., Gwadz M., Hurwitz D.I., Marchler G.H., Song J.S. et al.. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ning W., Guo Y., Lin S., Mei B., Wu Y., Jiang P., Tan X., Zhang W., Chen G., Peng D. et al.. DrLLPS: a data resource of liquid–liquid phase separation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Li Q., Peng X., Li Y., Tang W., Zhu J., Huang J., Qi Y., Zhang Z.. LLPSDB: a database of proteins undergoing liquid–liquid phase separation in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. You K., Huang Q., Yu C., Shen B., Sevilla C., Shi M., Hermjakob H., Chen Y., Li T.. PhaSepDB: a database of liquid–liquid phase separation related proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mészáros B., Erdős G., Szabó B., Schád É., Tantos Á., Abukhairan R., Horváth T., Murvai N., Kovács O.P., Kovács M. et al.. PhaSePro: the database of proteins driving liquid–liquid phase separation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Feng Z., Chen X., Wu X., Zhang M.. Formation of biological condensates via phase separation: characteristics, analytical methods, and physiological implications. J. Biol. Chem. 2019; 294:14823–14835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Alberti S, Dormann D.. Liquid–liquid phase separation in disease. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2019; 53:doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hatos A., Hajdu-Soltész B., Monzon A.M., Palopoli N., Álvarez L., Aykac-Fas B., Bassot C., Benítez G.I., Bevilacqua M., Chasapi A. et al.. DisProt: intrinsic protein disorder annotation in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Louros N., Konstantoulea K., De Vleeschouwer M., Ramakers M., Schymkowitz J., Rousseau F.. WALTZ-DB 2.0: an updated database containing structural information of experimentally determined amyloid-forming peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Armstrong D.R., Berrisford J.M., Conroy M.J., Gutmanas A., Anyango S., Choudhary P., Clark A.R., Dana J.M., Deshpande M., Dunlop R. et al.. PDBe: improved findability of macromolecular structure data in the PDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. PDBe-KB consortium PDBe-KB: a community-driven resource for structural and functional annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Rodchenkov I., Babur O., Luna A., Aksoy B.A., Wong J.V., Fong D., Franz M., Siper M.C., Cheung M., Wrana M. et al.. Pathway Commons 2019 Update: integration, analysis and exploration of pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Jassal B., Matthews L., Viteri G., Gong C., Lorente P., Fabregat A., Sidiropoulos K., Cook J., Gillespie M., Haw R. et al.. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wishart D.S., Li C., Marcu A., Badran H., Pon A., Budinski Z., Patron J., Lipton D., Cao X., Oler E. et al.. PathBank: a comprehensive pathway database for model organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Norsigian C.J., Pusarla N., McConn J.L., Yurkovich J.T., Dräger A., Palsson B.O., King Z.. BiGG Models 2020: multi-strain genome-scale models and expansion across the phylogenetic tree. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Malik-Sheriff R.S., Glont M., Nguyen T.V.N., Tiwari K., Roberts M.G., Xavier A., Vu M.T., Men J., Maire M., Kananathan S. et al.. BioModels—15 years of sharing computational models in life science. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gumerov V.M., Ortega D.R., Adebali O., Ulrich L.E., Zhulin I.B.. MiST 3.0: an updated microbial signal transduction database with an emphasis on chemosensory systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Licata L., Surdo P.L., Iannuccelli M., Palma A., Micarelli E., Perfetto L., Peluso D., Calderone A., Castagnoli L., Cesareni G.. SIGNOR 2.0, the SIGnaling Network Open Resource 2.0: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kautsar S.A., Blin K., Shaw S., Navarro-Muñoz J.C., Terlouw B.R., van der Hooft J.J.J., van Santen J.A., Tracanna V., Suarez Duran H.G., Andreu V.P. et al.. MIBiG 2.0: a repository for biosynthetic gene clusters of known function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Palaniappan K., Chen I.-M.A., Chu K., Ratner A., Seshadri R., Kyrpides N.C., Ivanova N.N., Mouncey N.J.. MG-ABC v.5.0: an update to the IMG/Atlas of Biosynthetic gene clusters knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Blin K., Shaw S., Steinke K., Villebro R., Ziemert N., Lee S.Y., Weber T.. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47:W81–W87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Haug K., Cochrane K., Nainala V.C., Williams M., Chang J., Jayaseelan K.V., O’Donovan C.. MetaboLights: a resource evolving in response to the needs of its scientific community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Alcock B.P., Raphenya A.R., Lau T.T.Y., Tsang K.K., Bouchard M., Edalatmand A., Huynh W., Nguyen A.-L.V., Cheng A.A., Liu S. et al.. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Doster E., Lakin S.M., Dean C.J., Wolfe C., Young J.G., Boucher C., Belk K.E., Noyes N.R., Morley P.S.. MEGARes 2.0: a database for classification of antimicrobial drug, biocide and metal resistance determinants in metagenomic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Zhang H., Zhao Y., Zhang Z., Xiao J.. PADS Arsenal: a database of prokaryotic defense systems related genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Pourcel C., Touchon M., Villeriot N., Vernadet J.-P., Couvin D., Toffano-Nioche C., Vergnaud G.. CRISPRCasdb a successor of CRISPRdb containing CRISPR arrays and cas genes from complete genome sequences, and tools to download and query lists of repeats and spacers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Vallenet D., Calteau A., Dubois M., Amours P., Bazin A., Beuvin M., Burlot L., Bussell X., Fouteau S., Gautreau G. et al.. MicroScope: an integrated platform for the annotation and exploration of microbial gene functions through genomic, pangenomic and metabolic comparative analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Davis J.J., Wattam A.R., Aziz R.K., Brettin T., Butler R., Butler R.M., Chlenski P., Conrad N., Dickerman A., Dietrich E.M. et al.. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Urban M., Cuzick A., Seager J., Wood V., Rutherford K., Venkatesh S.Y., De Silva N., Martinez M.C., Pedro H., Yates A.D. et al.. PHI-base: the pathogen–host interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Mitchell A.L., Almeida A., Beracochea M., Boland M., Burgin J., Cochrane G., Crusoe M.R., Kale V., Potter S.C., Richardson L.J. et al.. MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. The Alliance of Genome Resources Consortium Alliance of Genome Resources Portal: unified model organism research platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Shefchek K.A., Harris N.L., Gargano M., Matentzoglu N., Unni D., Brush M., Keith D., Conlin T., Vasilevsky N., Zhang X.A. et al.. The Monarch Initiative in 2019: an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Smith J.R., Hayman G.T., Wang S.-J., Laulederkind S.J.F., Hoffman M.J., Kaldunski M.L., Tutaj M., Thota J., Nalabolu H.S., Ellanki S.L.R. et al.. The Year of the Rat: The Rat Genome Database at 20: a multi-species knowledgebase and analysis platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ng P.C., Wong E.D., MacPherson K.A., Aleksander S., Argasinska J., Dunn B., Nash R.S., Skrzypek M.S., Gondwe F., Jha S. et al.. Transcriptome visualization and data availability at the Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Harris T.W., Arnaboldi V., Cain S., Chan J., Chen W.J., Cho J., Davis P., Gao S., Grove C.A., Kishore R. et al.. WormBase: a modern Model Organism Information Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lu F., Wei Z., Luo Y., Guo H., Zhang G., Xia Q., Wang Y.. SilkDB 3.0: visualizing and exploring multiple levels of data for silkworm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Yates A.D., Achuthan P., Akanni W., Allen J., Allen J., Alvarez-Jarreta J., Amode M.R., Armean I.M., Azov A.G., Bennett R. et al.. Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Howe K.L., Contreras-Moreira B., De Silva N., Maslen G., Akanni W., Allen J., Alvarez-Jarreta J., Barba M., Bolser D.M., Cambell L. et al.. Ensembl Genomes 2020—enabling non-vertebrate genomic research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Lewin H.A., Robinson G.E., Kress W.J., Baker W.J., Coddington J., Crandall K.A., Durbin R., Edwards S.V., Forest F., Gilbert M.T.P. et al.. Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2018; 115:4325–4333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Singh P.P., Isambert H.. OHNOLOGS v2: a comprehensive resource for the genes retained from whole genome duplication in vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Armstrong J.F., Faccenda E., Harding S.D., Pawson A.J., Southan C., Sharman J.L., Campo B., Cavanagh D.R., Alexander S.P.H., Davenport A.P. et al.. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to pharmacology in 2020: extending immunopharmacology content and introducing the IUPHAR/MMV Guide to malaria pharmacology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Robinson J., Barker D.J., Georgiou X., Cooper M.A., Flicek P., Marsh S.G.E.. IPD-IMGT/HLA Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Gonzalez-Galarza F.F., McCabe A., Melo dos Santos E.J., Jones J., Takeshita L., Ortega-Rivera N.D., Del Cid-Pavon G.M., Ramsbottom K., Ghattaoraya G., Alfirevic A. et al.. Allele frequency net database (AFND) 2020 update: gold-standard data classification, open access genotype data and new query tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Omer A., Shemesh O., Peres A., Polak P., Shepherd A.J., Watson C.T., Boyd S.D., Collins A.M., Lees W., Yaari G.. VDJbase: an adaptive immune receptor genotype and haplotype database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Bagaev D.V., Vroomans R.M.A., Samir J., Stervbo U., Rius C., Dolton G., Greenshields-Watson A., Attaf M., Egorov E.S., Zvyagin I.V. et al.. VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Lees W., Busse C.E., Corcoran M., Ohlin M., Scheepers C., Matsen F.A. IV, Yaari G., Watson C.T., Collins A., Shepherd A.J. et al.. OGRDB: a reference database of inferred immune receptor genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Beck T., Shorter T., Brookes A.J.. GWAS Central: a comprehensive resource for the discovery and comparison of genotype and phenotype data from genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Tian D., Wang P., Tang B., Teng X., Li C., Liu X., Zou D., Song S., Zhang Z.. GWAS Atlas: a curated resource of genome-wide variant-trait associations in plants and animals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wang J., Huang D., Zhou Y., Yao H., Liu H., Zhai S., Wu C., Zheng Z., Zhao K., Wang Z. et al.. CAUSALdb: a database for disease/trait causal variants identified using summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Jia P., Dai Y., Hu R., Pei G., Manuel A.M., Zhao Z.. TSEA-DB: a trait–tissue association map for human complex traits and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Gao Y., Zhang C., Yuan L., Ling Y., Wang X., Liu C., Pan Y., Zhang X., Ma X., Wang Y. et al.. PGG.Han: the Han Chinese genome database and analysis platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Wang Y., Zhang S., Li F., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Zhang R., Zhu J., Ren Y., Tan Y. et al.. Therapeutic target database 2020: enriched resource for facilitating research and early development of targeted therapeutics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Landaburu L.U., Berenstein A.J., Videla S., Maru P., Shanmugam D., Chernomoretz A., Agüero F.. TDR Targets 6: driving drug discovery for human pathogens through intensive chemogenomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Landrum M.J., Chitipiralla S., Brown G.R., Chen C., Gu B., Hart J., Hoffman D., Jang W., Kaur K., Liu C. et al.. ClinVar: improvements to accessing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Piñero J., Ramírez-Anguita J.M., Saüch-Pitarch J., Ronzano F., Centeno E., Sanz F., Furlong L.I.. The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Wang C., Yang J., Luo H., Wang K., Wang Y., Xiao Z.-X., Tao X., Jiang H., Cai H.. CancerTracer: a curated database for intrapatient tumor heterogeneity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Ding W., Chen J., Feng G., Chen G., Wu J., Guo Y., Ni X., Shi T.. DNMIVD: DNA methylation interactive visualization database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Tian F., Yang D.-C., Meng Y.-Q., Jin J., Gao G.. PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Togninalli M., Seren Ü., Freudenthal J.A., Monroe J.G., Meng D., Nordborg M., Weigel D., Borgwardt K., Korte A., Grimm D.G.. AraPheno and the AraGWAS Catalog 2020: a major database update including RNA-Seq and knockout mutation data for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Wang D., Fan W., Guo X., Wu K., Zhou S., Chen Z., Li D., Wang K., Zhu Y., Zhou Y.. MaGenDB: a functional genomics hub for Malvaceae plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Peng H., Wang K., Chen Z., Cao Y., Gao Q., Li Y., Li X., Lu H., Du H., Lu M. et al.. MBKbase for rice: an integrated omics knowledgebase for molecular breeding in rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Deutsch E.W., Bandeira N., Sharma V., Perez-Riverol Y., Carver J.J., Kundu D.J., García-Seisdedos D., Jarnuczak A.F., Hewapathirana S., Pullman B.S. et al.. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2020: enabling ‘big data’ approaches in proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Samaras P., Schmidt T., Frejno M., Gessulat S., Reinecke M., Jarzab A., Zecha J., Mergner J., Giansanti P., Ehrlich H.-C. et al.. ProteomicsDB: a multi-omics and multi-organism resource for life science research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Shao X., Taha I.N., Clauser K.R., Naba A.. MatrisomeDB: the ECM-protein knowledge database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Nizami B., Bereczki-Szakál D., Varró N., el Battioui K., Nagaraj V.U., Szigyártó I.C., Mándity I., Beke-Somfai T.. FoldamerDB: a database of peptidic foldamers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Rubach P., Zajac S., Jastrzebski B., Sulkowska J.I., Sułkowski P.. Genus for biomolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; doi:10.1093/nar/gkz845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES