The Articles by William Hamilton and colleagues1 and Rob van der Pluijm and colleagues2 illustrate the plummeting clinical efficacy of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine as a first-line treatment for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in southeast Asia. These authors also report a rapid regional spread of clonal parasite lineages harbouring novel variants of the P falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter PfCRT (emerging on the chloroquine-resistant Dd2 isoform). These lineages exclusively harboured the Cys580Tyr mutation in the K13 gene that is associated with decreased artemisinin efficacy. These studies raise important questions about whether these novel PfCRT variants cause piperaquine resistance, how they effect other antimalarials, and whether changes in prevalence over time reflect differences in parasite fitness.
Here, we show that the now predominant PfCRT Thr93Ser and Ile218Phe mutations, which of all mutations have expanded the most rapidly in the past 5 years,1,2 confer piperaquine resistance when individually edited into the pfcrt locus of Dd2 parasites. Assays with cultured intra-erythrocytic parasites show 8–13% survival at piperaquine concentrations ranging from 200 nM to 1600 nM (figure; appendix p 5). The Phe145Ile mutation was highly piperaquine-resistant, with 57–69% survival at these elevated concentrations, consistent with previous findings.3 Parental or control Dd2 parasites with an edited pfcrt showed less than 1% survival, reflecting background rates. Quantitative PCR assays showed a single copy of plasmepsin II in all edited parasites (data not shown), indicating that amplification of this initial resistance marker4,5 was not required for piperaquine resistance.
Whole-genome sequence data of 84 Cambodian isolates support the expansion of Thr93Ser and Ile218Phe between 2013 and 2016, overtaking the prevalence of Phe145Ile (appendix p 4). Recent years showed a reduced percentage of parasites harbouring four or more copies of plasmepsins II and III, although parasites with two to three copies remained the majority (appendix p 4). pfmdr1 amplification, a marker of reduced susceptibility to lumefantrine and mefloquine, became less common over time (appendix p 4). Survival rates of piperaquine-treated cultured parasites increased over the years (appendix p 4), mirroring increasing dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine clinical failure rates. Emerging PfCRT mutations also increased P falciparum susceptibility to chloroquine, amodiaquine, quinine, pyronaridine, and ferroquine, with the Phe145Ile mutation causing the greatest sensitisation (appendix pp 6, 7). Dihydroartemisinin, lumefantrine, and mefloquine were unchanged. These data highlight the broad effect of PfCRT mutations on multiple antimalarials.
To test for differences in parasite fitness between mutants, we used a competitive growth rate assay in which each parasite line was individually cocultured with an isogenic green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive Dd2 line. Parasites expressing the Thr93Ser allele showed a negligible fitness cost compared with control Dd2 pfcrt-edited parasites, with both lines out-proliferating GFP-positive Dd2 parasites (figure). The Ile218Phe mutation showed a mild growth attenuation. Phe145Ile parasites showed a substantial fitness cost, potentially explaining why this allele is ceding ground to the less resistant but fitter Thr93Ser and Ile218Phe mutations.
The data support a key role for PfCRT mutations in driving the recent expansion of highly piperaquine-resistant parasites in southeast Asia and highlight the need for vigilance in screening for novel PfCRT mutations in other malaria-endemic regions, notably in Africa or South America where piperaquine use has been increasing.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
See Online for appendix
We declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Hamilton WL, Amato R, van der Pluijm RW, et al. Evolution and expansion of multidrug-resistant malaria in southeast Asia: a genomic epidemiology study. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 943–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van der Pluijm RW, Imwong M, Chau NH, et al. Determinants of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine treatment failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam: a prospective clinical, pharmacological and genetic study. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 952–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Witkowski B, Duru V, Khim N, et al. A surrogate marker of piperaquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a phenotype-genotype association study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 174–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Amato R, Lim P, Miotto O, et al. Genetic markers associated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: a genotype-phenotype association study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 164–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ross LS, Dhingra SK, Mok S, et al. Emerging Southeast Asian PfCRT mutations confer Plasmodium falciparum resistance to the first-line antimalarial piperaquine. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 3314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.