Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2019 Oct 25;20(9):1451. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01128-0

Correction to: Cost‑effectiveness analysis of stand‑alone or combined non‑invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study

Valentina Lorenzoni 1,, Stefania Bellelli 1, Chiara Caselli 2, Juhani Knuuti 3, Stephen Richard Underwood 4, Danilo Neglia 2,5, Giuseppe Turchetti 1; For the EVINCI Investigators
PMCID: PMC6943386  PMID: 31654289

Correction to: The European Journal of Health Economics 10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5

In the Published article, the value in the abstract has been published incorrectly. The correct abstract section is as follows:

Abstract

Aim This study aimed at evaluating the cost effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) study.

Methods and results Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 350 patients (209 males, mean age 59 ± 9 years) with symptoms of suspected stable CAD undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and at least one cardiac imaging stress test prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and in whom imaging exams were analysed at dedicated core laboratories. Stand-alone stress tests or combined non-invasive strategies, when the first exam was uncertain, were compared. The diagnostic end point was obstructive CAD defined as > 50% stenosis at quantitative ICA in the left main or at least one major coronary vessel. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of correct diagnosis (cd) and costs were calculated using country-specific reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were obtained using per-patient data and considering “no-imaging” as reference. The overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 28%. Strategies combining CTCA followed by stress ECHO, SPECT, PET, or stress CMR followed by CTCA were all cost effective. ICERs values indicated cost saving from − 969€/cd for CMR-CTCA to − 1490€/cd for CTCA-PET, − 3092€/cd for CTCA-SPECT and − 3776€/cd for CTCA-ECHO, similarly when considering early revascularization as effectiveness measure.

Conclusion In patients with suspected stable CAD and low prevalence of disease, combined non-invasive strategies with CTCA and stress imaging are cost effective as gatekeepers to ICA and to select candidates for early revascularization.

The original article has been updated.

Contributor Information

Valentina Lorenzoni, Phone: +39050883826, Email: v.lorenzoni@sssup.it.

For the EVINCI Investigators:

Mikko Pietila, Maija Mäki, Anna Teresinska, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Maria Nazarena Pizzi, Giancarlo Todiere, Alessia Gimelli, Massimo Lombardi, Stefano Puzzuoli, Maurizio Mangione, Paolo Marcheschi, Stephen Schroeder, Tanja Drosch, Rosa Poddighe, Giancarlo Casolo, Constantinos Anagnostopoulos, Francesca Pugliese, Francois Rouzet, Dominique Le Guludec, Francesco Cappelli, Serana Valente, Gian Franco Gensini, Camilla Zawaideh, Selene Capitanio, Gianmario Sambuceti, Fabio Marsico, Pasquale Perrone Filardi, Covadonga Fernández-Golfín, Luis M. Rincón, José L. Zamorano, Frank P. Graner, Stephan Nekolla, Michiel A. de Graaf, Arthur J. H. A. Scholte, Michael Fiechter, Julia Stehli, Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Eliana Reyes, Sandy Nkomo, Clara Carpeggiani, Daniela Giannessi, Fabio Mariani, Martina Marinelli, and Rosa Sicari


Articles from The European Journal of Health Economics are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES