Correction to:
Wien Klin Wochenschr 2019
10.1007/s00508-019-01541-8
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Tab. 4 was incorrect. The corrected table is given below.
Table 4.
Mean BMD measurement values in Hounsfield units (HU) at baseline and follow-up; p < 0.0002. Visualization of changes in BMD for each patient are displayed using color coding (red = high bone growth, green = moderate bone growth, blue = low bone growth)
| Patient | Mean BMD base | Mean BMD follow-up | Visualization of BMD changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80.668 | 133.284 |
|
| 2 | 66.473 | 120.400 |
|
| 3 | 56.267 | 109.557 |
|
| 4 | 52.394 | 74.488 |
|
| 5 | 31.892 | 128.767 |
|
| 6 | 60.847 | 76.738 |
|
| 7 | 52.735 | 110.897 |
|
| 8 | 58.040 | 178.214 |
|
| 9 | 46.363 | 100.354 |
|
| 10 | 43.953 | 150.971 |
|
| 11 | 45.303 | 108.430 |
|
| 12 | 60.094 | 58.141 |
|
|
Mean BMD (range) |
54.586 (31.892–80.668) |
112.487 (178.214–58.141) |
p < 0.0002 |
The original article has been corrected.