Abstract
A robust fluorescent readout assay using topologically-sensitive dyes improves the screening of novel amyloid-binding molecules. One of the key components that make this assay more realistic is the use of endogenous amyloid obtained from 5XFAD mouse brains. The assay conditions were optimized for high throughput screening operation with Z-prime values >0.6. Using a combination of library of 3,500 compounds including known drugs, natural-derived molecules and random organic molecules, 8 unique molecules were identified as potential amyloid-binding agents.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid, high throughput screening
INTRODUCTION
With the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) projected to rise dramatically in the coming decades [1], there is an increasing urgency to develop novel therapies for the prevention and treatment of this debilitating disease [2, 3]. Currently, the mechanism that regulates neuronal degeneration in AD remains unknown; however, the cytopathological hallmarks of AD appear to be the formation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques between the neurons, which leads ultimately to profound neuron toxicity and atrophy [4]. According to the Aβ cascade hypothesis, failure to eliminate soluble Aβ from the brain resulted in Aβ aggregation, which alters homeostasis and neuronal environment resulting in cognitive decline and dementia [5]. Therefore, if Aβ plaques were an underlying mechanism that causes dementia, preventing their formation or dismantling existing plaques, specifically at the early onset of the disease, would be an ultimate goal to prevent AD. Given the critical unmet medical needs in AD, there has been considerable interest in the identification of novel Aβ binding/inhibitor molecules. Rational design of Aβ inhibitors is hampered due to the lack of high-resolution structures of Aβ plaques. A large number of reports in the literature describe a range of inter mediates along the Aβ aggregation pathway that have been implicated as potentially toxic species [6-10]. However, at present no detailed structural information is available for Aβ fibrils, as knowing which parts of Aβ are important for filament formation is relevant for the development of drugs, owing to their short-lived intermediates and their insoluble nature. As a result, there is still enormous uncertainty over the question whether rationally structural-based drug design of Aβ inhibitors is an effective approach to identify Aβ-binding inhibitors. One of the alternative approaches focuses on high throughput screening (HTS) [11]. In fact, the flexibility of HTS has allowed numerous and disparate areas of biology to engage with an equally diverse palate of chemistry [12]. Here, we describe the development of an HTS assay to screen for Aβ-binding molecules called high-throughput amyloid thioflavin competitive binding optical assay (HATCO) to identify Aβ-binding molecules. The assay relies on the fluorescence (FL) readout of thiofalvin-T; according to the quantum mechanic theory, this class of FL dyes possesses substantial conformation freedom while remaining in free solution, and thus rapidly quenches excited states generated by photon excitation and exhibits a relatively low FL signal [13]. However, upon binding to Aβ plaques, the conformation freedom is dramatically reduced. This increased structural rigidity decreases the vibrational and rotational processes, which results in a decreased radiation decay rate in both ground and excited states [13], cumulatively, this phenomenon contributes to the observed increase in the FL quantum yield when bound to Aβ plaques as compared to the unbound state [14]. A schematic depiction for the HATCO assay is shown in Fig. 1, particularly for the case of thioflavin-T, when not bound to Aβ plaques, the dye emits a weak FL signal at a λ max of approximately 440–445 nm. However, when bound to Aβ plaque, its FL increases dramatically and results in a strong FL signal with a characteristically shifted λmax to approximately 485 nm [15]. This dynamic reporter has been exploited to monitor fibrillary kinetics in real time, and produced a single time-point readouts [16-18]. LeVine et al. first reported the use of this technique for screening Aβ-binding compounds [17]. Klunk et al. employed this dynamic reporter to develop quantitative methods to determine the properties of Aβ peptide aggregation [19, 20], since then, a number of high-throughput methods have been derived to screen for compounds able to interfere with Aβ aggregation [21-23].
Fig. 1.
Topologically activated property of Thioflavin-T. A) insignificant FL signal in free solution. B) Enhanced FL signal upon binding to Aβ plaques from 5XFAD brain lysate. C) An inhibitor competes with Thioflavin-T for Aβ resulted in reduced FL signal.
To date, all of the screening assays discussed above have been limited to screening a small number of molecules, and many, if not all, still employed synthetic Aβ peptides as a surrogate for endogenous Aβ in the brain during the assay. The rationale for this approach is the ease of using synthetic peptides, which can be stored as lyophilized powders and the process of amyloidogenesis can be achieved by simply dissolving the peptides in conditioned buffers. Simple as this system seems, it is nevertheless often influenced by the tendency of different batches of peptides to vary in their secondary structure and aggregation state [24]. The formation of plaques using peptides is a complex process, which is based on a continuous process involving protein misfolding, association and conformational rearrangements, and all depend on time, solvents and handling procedures. As a result, this error-prone process has a proclivity for inconsistent outcomes, hit compounds identified from such operations do not always have the same effect in vivo. Taken together, these limitations support the use of reliable source of Aβ plaques to ensure the reproducibility of the assay. In this work, we report for the first time the optimization of the HATCO assay using endogenous source of Aβ obtained from the brains of 5XFAD mice for a large-scale HTS operation. The APP/PS1 double transgenic mouse model coexpressed five familial AD (FAD) and additively increase Aβ42 production [25]. This animal model express Aβ at 1.5 months, and at the age of 6 months, massive levels of Aβ could be found in the subiculum, CA regions, and the cortex [25]. For HTS assays, all of the brain lysate was obtained from 8-month-old 5XFAD mice, and the control brain lysate was generated from age-matched wild-type (wt) mice. Since the library of screened compounds was selected based on ideal logP values for blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, but not on structural priority similar to known Aβ-binding molecules, we expect that the HATCO assay will enhance the likelihood to identify novel Aβ-binding molecules with diverse and untapped regions of chemical structures, thus offering the promise of advancing the chemical genetics for AD therapeutic drugs.
METHODS
Black 384-well low-flange, flat-bottom assay plates were obtained from Corning (New York). Brain lysates of wt and 5XFAD mice were prepared freshly from isolated brains. Thioflavin-T and DMSO were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO). All other reagents/solvents were of analytical grade, and used as received from commercial source without further purifications.
The 5XFAD mice were maintained at Vanderbilt University under standard conditions, in a 12 h light/dark cycle and with free access to food and water. The 5XFAD mice overexpress both mutant human APP and PS1 express high APP levels correlating with high burden and accelerated accumulation of the Aβ. A colony of 5XFAD transgenic mice obtained from Jackson Laboratories was maintained by crossing 5XFAD mice with a wt C57BL/6J strain. The mice were genotyped by a standard polymerase chain reaction using DNA isolated from tail tips with the following primers: PSEN1 forward, 5’–TCATGACTATCCTCCTGGTGG-3’ and reverse, 5’-CGTTATAGGTTTTAAACACTTCCCC-3’. For APP, forward, 5’ -AGGACTGACCACTCGACCAG-3’ and reverse, 5’ -CGGGGGTCTAGTTCTGCAT-3’. We also genotyped mice for the presence of retinal degeneration Pde6brd1 mutation using forward, 5’ -AAGCTAGCTGCAGTAACGCCATTT-3’ and reverse, 5’-ACCTGCATGTGAACCCAGTATTCTATC-3’. After polymerase chain reaction amplification, the DNA product of each reaction was analyzed by size fractionation through a 1% agarose gel; with Pde6b mutant = 560 bp, APP transgene = 377 bp and PSEN1 transgene =608 bp.
Animal experiments were conducted per the guidelines established by Vanderbilt University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. At the end of the study, animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation after sedated with isoflurane. Clinical signs were used to check after animal euthanasia including heartbeats, toe-pinching for reflection. Further, if animals show signs of illness (weight loss, food withdrawal, or infection) they will be sacrificed before the endpoints. All experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Vanderbilt University IACUC panel.
Brain lysate preparation
Excised midbrains of 5XFAD (8-month-old) or wt mice (age-matched) were homogenized for 5 min in 200 μL of buffer comprised of 21.4 g sucrose, 5mL of 1Mtris base, and 0.5mL of 0.5 MEDTA/250mL DPBS using the T-25 basic Ultra-Turrax homog-enizer. Additional 100 μL aliquots of this buffer were then added to the homogenized sample and rehomogenized for 2 min until a total added volume of 800 μL was attained. The sample was diluted to 4mL total volume using another buffer comprised of 5% BSA, and 0.03%Tween 20 in DPBS solution. Roche Complete protease inhibitor tablets were added to both buffers immediately prior to use (1 tablet/10mL buffer). The sample was centrifuged at 16,000 g for 30 min at 4°C. Aliquots of the supernatant were stored at −80°C until use.
HATCO HTS assay
To translate the assay initially performed on a cuvette to a 384-well format, the general protocol includes the following steps: A fresh stock solution of thioflavin-T was prepared in distilled and deionized water after passing through a micro filter. The concentration of total protein was measured according to Beer’s law with an extinction coefficient of 26,620M−1cm−1 at 416 nm. The stock solution was stored in darkness using aluminum foil and kept at 4°C throughout the assay. Unless stated, each assaying well contained 10 μM of thioflavin-T, 5 mg/mL of freshly isolated and homogenized brain lysate (5μL) obtained from 5XFAD mice and with 30 μM of screening compounds. During the assay development, the positive control was used at a concentration of 100μM to achieve itsmaximal effect. For the negative control, the wells contained the same components minus positive control. The protein concentration of brain lysate throughout the study was normalized. After equilibration for 10min at room temperature, the FL signal of the sample was measured using a Biotek Synergy NEO plate reader at an emission lambda max of 485 nm using an excitation of 465 nm and the signals of the different conditions were analyzed. The final volume per well was 50 μL. All assays were performed using a single dose of screening compounds in triplicate.
Once the preliminary hit compounds were indentified, a cross-screening protocol was employed to validate the hits with duplicated concentrations for each hit. Combined with the data in the first run, each candidate has three screening values, which enable for statistical analysis. The best fit compounds will be selected for the next screening using nine concentrations each to determine the tentative IC50 values, adapted within the HATCO assay. In this data range, the original test concentration was also included in the analysis. In its finalized 384-well format, this procedure involves two phases. In the first phase of the cross-screening procedure, the absorbance profile of each hit compound was evaluated over the 250–900 nm wavelength range in a triplicate fashion using the Synergy Neo Multi-Microplate reader (BioTek). Scatterplots of absorbance as a function of wavelength were then used to qualitatively assess whether the analyzed hit compound significantly absorb at the relevant wavelengths. For example, as the way HATCO assay was designed, a reduction of the emission of thioflavin-T at 485 nm, due to displacement by the small molecule, was the primary indicator of Aβ-binding potential of the small molecule in the assay. If the hit compounds absorbing at this wavelength, they should be considered false positives. To quantitatively cross-screen for false positives secondary to interference of thioflavin-T absorbance or emission at 410 nm and 485 nm, respectively, a separate experimental design was employed. In this second phase of cross-screening, 125 nL of each hit compound (10milliM) was plated with 25 μL of thioflavin-T (10 μM) in triplicate fashion. As a control, 25 μL of 10μM thioflavin-T was plated in the presence of 125 nL of DMSO. Again, the Synergy Neo Multi-Mode Microplate reader (BioTek) was employed to measure thioflavin-T’s emission at 485 nm (excitation 410 nm). Statistical determination of false-positives was accomplished via a Paired 2-tailed Student T-test comparing of the mean fluorescence for the DMSO-treated control wells to that of wells containing thioflavin-T and the positive hit compound. In this work, a p-value <0.05 was used as the threshold statistic for classification as a false positive hit.
Compound library selection
We screened approximately 3500 compounds selected from NIH Clinical Collection I & II. Many of these small molecules have been used in humans for different purposes. Another library where compounds were selected from is Spectrum collection. This library has a wide range of analogs of biologically active and structurally diverse compounds. Those compounds have known properties and they can be used for prioritization in the screening tier, the compounds including 50% drug components, 30% natural product, and 20% other bioactive components.
All compounds were screened on 11 plates. The Z-prime valuewas calculated for each plate as a measure of assay quality. Outliers were selected by determining which wells exhibited FL values that fell outside of three standard deviations of the means of the FL value of all test compounds on individual plates.
Automatic dispenser and liquid
In a 384-well plate format using fluorescent readout, precise distribution of minutes amount of dye via robotic system as well as participating reagents and solvents is crucial to maintain the quality and reproducibility of the assay. Buffers and solvents were distributed across the plate via the ECHO liquid handling system, while thioflavin-T aliquots and 5XFAD brain lysate were dispensed using the Bravo system. All tip-based dispensers used tip-touch procedure to eliminate the possibility of reagent adhesion to the pipette tips. Each well is thoroughly mixed ten times by the automated liquid handling algorithm to increase equilibrium. To reduce variability between samples secondary to variations in loading, deep-well source plates of thioflavin-T and 5XFAD lysate were generated using the COMBI liquid handling system. It is noteworthy that prior to loading the source plate using the COMBIliquid handling system, all reagents were vortexed for 10 min and sonicated 15 min at 4°C. While the tested compound library was dispensed using the ECHO liquid handling system. The positive control was designed as the observed FL signal in the presence of the promethazine, an Aβ inhibitor that we reported in the past [26] while negative control is associated with the observed FL signal in the absence of promethazine.
Estimation of the assay quality
Before screening a large library of compounds, pilot screens were used to assess the quality of the assay to predict whether the design is suitable for use in a full-scale and high-throughput manner. The Z-prime value incorporates both the dynamic range of the assay as well as well-to-well variability [27]. The Z-prime value is defined in terms of four parameters: the means (μ) and standard deviations (σ) of both the positive (p) and negative (n) controls (μp, σp, and μn σn).
where the means (μ) and standard deviations (σ) of both the positive (p) and negative (n) controls (μp, σp, and μn, σn). Z-prime values can be categorized into three groups corresponding to useless, marginal and excellent assays. A hypothetical ideal assay carries a Z-prime value of 1, the maximum Z-prime mathematically possible, whereas a Z-prime value less than 0 indicates that there is too much overlap between positive and negative controls for the assay to be useful. More commonly seen are assays characterized by Z-prime in the range of 0 to 1. In this range, an assay characterized by a Z-prime between 0–0.5 is considered marginally useful while a Z-prime above 0.5 qualifies an assay to be considered excellent.
RESULTS
The quality of brain lysate as a source of Aβ
The HATCO assay relies on specific interaction between thioflavin-T and Aβ present in the 5XFAD brain lysate resulting in a significantly dynamic signal change. Questions remain over whether small amount of brain lysate has enough Aβ to activate the signal or whether other proteins in the brain may also have affinity for thioflavin-T, thus producing false-positive signals. To answer these fundamental questions, serial dilutions of 5XFAD and wt brain lysates were incubated with thioflavin-T; as depicted graphically in Fig. 2, the FL at 485 nm emanated from thioflavin-T among the dilutions of 5XFAD are consistently higher that found in wt counterparts. Further, the signal was reciprocal to the concentration of brain lysate. It is noteworthy that the concentration of the brain lysate in each assay was quantified by BCA assay and distributed equally as designated in each well during the assay. During the validation process, over 50 different batches of mouse brain lysates have been prepared, tested, and confirmed this observation, demonstrating the robustness, reliability and reproducibility of using 5XFAD brain lysate.
Fig. 2.
The FL signal intensity of Thioflavin-T was enhanced in proportion to the increasing concentration of 5XFAD brain lysate.
Solvent effect
During the course of work, we realized that although DMSO is a great solvent for amphiphilic molecules, which have structurally diverse functional groups, the major concern regarding the use of DMSO is the potential perturbation of the inter-molecular binding since it is an amphiphile. To address this concern, the proportion of DMSO was incrementally increased in the HATCO assay from 2.5% to 50% of the assays total volume. For example, in a 2.5% total volume condition, 625 nanoliters of DMSO was added to 20 μL of 5XFAD lysate (5 mg/mL) and 5 μL of thioflavin-T (10 μM). Similarly for the 50% total volume DMSO condition, 12.5 μL of DMSO was added to the same volumes of Aμ-containing lysate and thioflavin-T. As graphically illustrated in Fig. 3, the inclusion of DMSO in the assay attenuates thioflavin-T fluorescence at 485 nm in a dose-dependent manner. Negligible loss of Aμ-specific thioflavin-T signal at 485 nm up to 5% total volume of DMSO, with a dose-dependent decrease in signal at increasing higher concentrations. Cumulatively, the result suggests that the HATCO assay is compatible with the use of DMSO as a solvent up to a threshold tolerance 5% of the assay’s total volume.
Fig. 3.
Solvent effects of the HATCO assay. DMSO was included in the assay from 2.5%–50% of total volume. For each of these conditions, a FL profile secondary to excitation at 410 nm was collected on the sample across an emission range of 430–550 nm.
The HATCO assay can be optimized for HTS operation
The quality of the HATCO assay was assessed using the Z’ value via triplicate 384-well plates in order to predict if it is suitable for an HTS setting. In this assay, all components of the assay were scaled down in term of volume and the precision optimized using the BRAVO liquid handling system; all dispensing operations were double-checked to ensure no presence of microdroplets on the pipette tips that might resulting in some outliers among the sample leading to an apparent unfavorable Z-factor. All wells were added with equal amount of brain lysate (5mg/mL; 20 μL) followed by thioflavin-T (10μM, 5μL). In a typical “min-max” experiment in a checkerboard pattern, the wells correspond to “min” value contained only Thioflavin-T (control, in Fig. 4). The “max” wells contained brain lysates and Thioflavin-T. One of the first tasks is to determine the optimal incubation time and we found that after incubation, we not only can get ideal “min-max” values, but the p values are also remarkable at Z’-prime values >0.6 and a coefficient of variation ~ 4%. In this scale screening of 3,500 compounds using eleven 384-well plates, in which como c ddddgoverall average Z-prime value for 11 plates was 0.6215.
Fig. 4.
Scatter plot of the emission at 485 nm of Thioflavin-T measured from 384-well plate loaded with Thioflavin-T alone or Thioflavin-T with 5XFAD brain lysate corresponding to “min-max” conditions, respectively in a checkerboard pattern. The Z-prime values were assessed along with variations.
HATCO assay reveals novel Aβ-binding compounds
Using the optimized assay conditions, we screened a library of 3,500 structurally diverse compounds with diverse chemical constituents and classifications, including of which 50% are FDA-approved drugs, 30% natural products, and 20% random bioactively organic compounds. Through the assay, 44 hit compounds were identified in the primary screen (Supplementary Figure 1).
The screening assay was repeated for those hit compounds. In contrast to the previous experiment in which only a single well was allocated for each molecule, each of the hit compound was tested in duplicate in this cross-validation assay. As expected, the outcome highlighted the reliability of the assay, 35 of 44 originally identified hit compounds exhibited similar properties as observed in the primary screen that they fit the classification of Aβ-binding molecules. Nevertheless, 20 compounds failed to reach statistical significance when the assay was repeated for these 35 compounds in a triplicate, due to exhibition of low percent of inhibition and displayed below the threshold with p values >0.5 and thus they were eliminated from further consideration.
HATCO competitive binding study
After primary and cross-screening experiments, only 15 compounds were qualified for the next screening operation involving competition binding assays, in which many and various concentrations of a putative hit compound ranging from 15–300 nM was tested as described in the primary assay, albeit in a duplicate fashion using the 384-well format. The addition of increasing concentrations of identified lead compounds to a mixture of fixed amount of brain lysate and thioflavin-T resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in fluorescence. To facilitate the generation of concentration-response curves, fluorescence at each data point was averaged on a compound-by-compound basis and plotted as a function of concentration. As expected, plotting of the resultant fluorescence data as a function of concentration in a logarithmic fashion revealed the characteristic sigmoidal curve. From this curve, IC50 values for each compound were calculated by fitting the data to a 4-parameter logistical model in the GraphPad software package. Overall, 8 compounds were indentified as having potentials for use as Aβ-binding agents (Table 1).
Table 1.
Aβ-binding molecules identified from HATCO assay after screening 3,500 compounds
| Chemical Structure | Chemical Name | IC50 (μM) |
MW (g/mol) |
CLogP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2-Hydroxy-3,5-dinitro-benzoic acid (5-nitro-furan-2-ylmethylene)-hydrazide | 61.23 | 365.21 | 2.40 |
![]() |
3-Phenylazo-pyridine-2,6-diamine (Phenazopyridine) | 74.29 | 213.24 | 2.05 |
![]() |
2, 4a, 6a, 9, 10, 12b,14a-Heptamethyl-11-oxo-1, 2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 6a, 11, 12b, 13, 14, 14a, 14b-tetradecahydropicene-2-carbaldehyde | 108.52 | 481.69 | 6.82 |
![]() |
2, 3, 5, 6-Tetrachloro-[1, 4]benzoquinone (Chloranil) | 90.85 | 245.88 | 3.3 |
![]() |
2-Hydroxy-5-[4-(pyridine-2-ylsulfamoyl)-phenylazo]-benzoic acid (Azulfidine) | 68.07 | 398.39 | 3.88 |
![]() |
1, 6, 7, 1’, 6’, 7’-Hexahydroxy-5, 5’-diisopropyl-3, 3’-dimethyl-[2, 2’]binaphthalenyl-8, 8’-dicarbaldehyde (Gossypol) | 84.17 | 518.55 | 5.36 |
![]() |
(E)-5-(4-hydroxystyryl)benzene-1, 3-diol (Resveratrol) | a | 228.25 | 2.83 |
![]() |
N, N-dimethyl-1-(10H-phenothiazin-10-yl)propan-2-amine(Promethazine) | 53.63 | 284.42 | 4.89 |
DISCUSSION
Since the arrival of the Aβ cascade hypothesis as a potential mechanism of AD proposed over 26 years ago [28], only a small number of Aβ-binding molecules were identified. Some have been tested in clinical trials as contrast agents, while others were solely used in vitro due to poor BBB penetration. Since then, additional new Aβ-binding molecules were derived, albeit based on structural assimilation deduced from known compounds. This practice greatly limits our search for other chemical structures other than a few familiar Aβ binding motifs, via aromatic pi-stacking [29], or chemical structures, such as naphthalene [30] or benzothiazole [31]. The random screening of a large library of compounds with ideal BBB penetrant characteristics using endogenous Aβ source from the brain lysate will not only facilitate the identification of novel chemical motifs, but it also maximizes the chance for the hit compounds to be translated for in vivo applications. The work will overcome the common reproducibility issues of generating Aβ plaques using peptides in vitro via nucleation-polymerization process [32], which is stochastic in character and strongly affected by nonspecific interaction.
The HATCO HTS assay successfully identified a number of new and known compounds, which have diverse chemical structures with Aβ-binding capability. Specifically, the unique ring structures of these molecules distinguish themselves from furan, benzoquinone, pyridine or stilbene rings, usually found in most Aβ-binding molecules. The ability of the hit compounds to inhibit thioflavin-T from binding to Aβ resulted in significantly attenuated FL signal as defined in the HATCO assay was confirmed based on repeated triplicate assays. As expected, the IC50 values obtained from this assay are unsuitable for immediate future therapeutic plans, but rather, the potential lead compounds require further structure activity relationship (SAR) studies for optimization. Interestingly, the assay also showed that resveratrol, a chemical found in red wine also exhibits Aβ binding capability in a concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure 2); the FL signal of thioflavin-T at 485 nm was reduced 4.4%, 25.9% and 51% at 100, 500, and 2000 μM, respectively. This observation is in line with previously reported data demonstrating the role of resveratrol in modulating Aβ levels in patients with AD [33-36]. Although, it has modest IC50 values (data not shown), the benefit of consuming natural products through healthy diets gains more ground in the campaign to prevent AD. Another notable message about this work is that the screened compounds have been preselected with ideal logp values thus identifying hits are BBB penetrants suitable for immediate in vivo assessment. Among the hit compounds, so far, we have only tested promethazine further in vivo experiments to demonstrate that the agent identified from the HATCO assay could cross the BBB and retained in the amyloid-burdened brain compared to normal brain and that its distribution within the brain corroborates with that of amyloid plaques [26]. The rest of the hit compounds will be assessed in the same manner in a near future.
In conclusion, the data in this work suggest that the HATCO assay is simple though robust and reliable. Once the condition is optimized, it can be used for screening a large library of compounds. To our knowledge, screening compounds for the brain, as shown in this experiment, is more challenging than others because one would have to face the solubility issues. We hope this assay will continue to yield more Aβ-binding molecules and eventually lead to the development of a new generation of therapy/diagnostic agents for AD.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partially supported by R01 CA160700 (W.P.), the NIH Clinical Collection is provided through the National Institutes of Health Molecular Libraries Roadmap Initiative and was distributed by the Vanderbilt High-throughput Screening Core Facility, an institutionally supported core.
Footnotes
Authors’ disclosures available online (https://www.j-alz.com/manuscript-disclosures/19-0316r1).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
The supplementary material is available in the electronic version of this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190316.
REFERENCES
- [1].Weuve J, Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Evans DA (2014) Deaths in the United States among persons with Alzheimer’s disease (2010-2050). Alzheimers Dement 10, e40–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Philibert KD, Marr RA, Norstrom EM, Glucksman MJ (2014) Identification and characterization of Abeta peptide interactors in Alzheimer’s disease by structural approaches. Front Aging Neurosci 6, 265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Macias MP, Gonzales AM, Siniard AL, Walker AW, Corneveaux JJ, Huentelman MJ, Sabbagh MN, Decourt B (2014) A cellular model of amyloid precursor protein processing and amyloid-beta peptide production. J Neurosci Methods 223, 114–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Selkoe DJ (2011) Alzheimer’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3, 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Weller RO, Subash M, Preston SD, Mazanti I, Carare RO (2008) Perivascular drainage of amyloid-beta peptides from the brain and its failure in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol 18, 253–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Viola KL, Klein WL (2015) Amyloid beta oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis, treatment, and diagnosis. Acta Neuropathol 129, 183–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ryan TM, Roberts BR, McColl G, Hare DJ, Doble PA, Li QX, Lind M, Roberts AM, Mertens HD, Kirby N, Pham CL, Hinds MG, Adlard PA, Barnham KJ, Curtain CC, Masters CL (2015) Stabilization of nontoxic Abeta-oligomers: Insights into the mechanism of action of hydroxyquinolines in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 35, 2871–2884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Matsuzaki K (2014) How do membranes initiate Alzheimer’s disease? formation of toxic amyloid fibrils by the amyloid beta-protein ganglioside clusters. Acc Chem Res 47, 2397–2404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Hong S, Ostaszewski BL, Yang T, O’Malley TT, Jin M, Yanagisawa K, Li S, Bartels T, Selkoe DJ (2014) Soluble Abeta oligomers are rapidly sequestered from brain ISF in vivo and bind GM1 ganglioside on cellular membranes. Neuron 82, 308–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Collins-Praino LE, Francis YI, Griffith EY, Wiegman AF, Urbach J, Lawton A, Honig LS, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Canoll PD, Goldman JE, Brickman AM (2014) Soluble amyloid beta levels are elevated in the white matter of Alzheimer’s patients, independent of cortical plaque severity. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2, 83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Chen J, Armstrong AH, Koehler AN, Hecht MH (2010) Small molecule microarrays enable the discovery of compounds that bind the Alzheimer’s Abeta peptide and reduce its cytotoxicity. J Am Chem Soc 132, 17015–17022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Inglese J, Shamu CE, Guy RK (2007) Reporting data from high-throughput screening of small-molecule libraries. Nat Chem Biol 3, 438–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Nolting DD, Gore JC, Pham W (2011) Near-infrared dyes: Probe development and applications in optical molecular imaging. Curr Org Synth 8, 521–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Nesterov EE, Skoch J, Hyman BT, Klunk WE, Bacskai BJ, Swager TM (2005) In vivo optical imaging of amyloid aggregates in brain: Design of fluorescent markers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44, 5452–5456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Hudson SA, Ecroyd H, Kee TW, Carver JA (2009) The thioflavin T fluorescence assay for amyloid fibril detection can be biased by the presence of exogenous compounds. FEBS J 276, 5960–5972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Khurana R, Coleman C, Ionescu-Zanetti C, Carter SA, Krishna V, Grover RK, Roy R, Singh S (2005) Mechanism of thioflavin T binding to amyloid fibrils. J Struct Biol 151, 229–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].LeVine H III (1993) Thioflavine T interaction with synthetic Alzheimer’s diease beta-amyloid peptides: Detection of amyloid aggregation in solution. Protein Sci 2, 404–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Naiki H, Higuchi K, Hosokawa M, Takeda T (1989) Fluorometric determination of amyloid fibrils in vitro using the fluorescent dye, thioflavin T1. Anal Biochem 177, 244–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Klunk WE, Jacob RF, Mason RP (1999) Quantifying amyloid by congo red spectral shift assay. Methods Enzymol 309, 285–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Klunk WE, Jacob RF, Mason RP (1999) Quantifying amyloid beta-peptide (Abeta) aggregation using the Congo red-Abeta (CR-abeta) spectrophotometric assay. Anal Biochem 266, 66–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Nakagami Y, Nishimura S, Murasugi T, Kubo T, Kaneko I, Meguro M, Marumoto S, Kogen H, Koyama K, Oda T (2002) A novel compound RS-0466 reverses beta-amyloid-induced cytotoxicity through the Akt signaling pathway in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 457, 11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nishimura S, Murasugi T, Kubo T, Kaneko I, Meguro M, Marumoto S, Kogen H, Koyama K, Oda T, Nakagami Y (2003) RS-4252 inhibits amyloid beta-induced cytotoxicity in HeLa cells. Pharmacol Toxicol 93, 29–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Wood SJ, MacKenzie L, Maleeff B, Hurle MR, Wetzel R (1996) Selective inhibition of Abeta fibril formation. J Biol Chem 271,4086–4092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Manzoni C, Colombo L, Messa M, Cagnotto A, Cantu L, Del Favero E, Salmona M (2009) Overcoming synthetic Abeta peptide aging: A new approach to an age-old problem. Amyloid 16, 71–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Oakley H, Cole SL, Logan S, Maus E, Shao P, Craft J, Guillozet-Bongaarts A, Ohno M, Disterhoft J, Van Eldik L, Berry R, Vassar R (2006) Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: Potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci 26, 10129–10140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].McClure RA, Chumbley CW, Reyzer ML, Wilson K, Caprioli RM, Gore JC, Pham W (2013) Identification of promethazine as an amyloid-binding molecule using a fluorescence high-throughput assay and MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Neuroimage Clin 2, 620–629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Day LR, gibson W, Williams KP (2010) Development of a high throughput screening assay for inhibitors of hedgehog-heparin interactions. Int J High Throughput Screen 1,69–80. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Selkoe DJ, Hardy J (2016) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med 8, 595–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Parikh ND, Klimov DK (2015) Molecular mechanisms of Alzheimer’s biomarker FDDNP binding to Abeta amyloid fibril. J Phys Chem B 119, 11568–11580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].He H, Xu J, Cheng DY, Fu L, Ge YS, Jiang FL, Liu Y (2017) Identification of binding modes for amino naphthalene 2-cyanoacrylate (ANCA) probes to amyloid fibrils from molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 121, 1211–1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Klunk WE, Wang Y, Huang GF, Debnath ML, Holt DP, Shao L, Hamilton RL, Ikonomovic MD, DeKosky ST, Mathis CA (2003) The binding of 2-(4’-methylaminophenyl)benzothiazole to postmortem brain homogenates is dominated by the amyloid component. J Neurosci 23, 2086–2092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Doig AJ, Del Castillo-Frias MP, Berthoumieu O, Tarus B, Nasica-Labouze J, Sterpone F, Nguyen PH, Hooper NM, Faller P, Derreumaux P (2017) Why is research on amyloid-beta failing to give new drugs for Alzheimer’s disease? ACS Chem Neurosci 8, 1435–1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Jerabek J, Uliassi E, Guidotti L, Korabecny J, Soukup O, Sepsova V, Hrabinova M, Kuca K, Bartolini M, Pena-Altamira LE, Petralla S, Monti B, Roberti M, Bolognesi ML (2017) Tacrine-resveratrol fused hybrids as multi-target-directed ligands against Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Med Chem 127, 250–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Loureiro JA, Andrade S, Duarte A, Neves AR, Queiroz JF, Nunes C, Sevin E, Fenart L, Gosselet F, Coelho MA, Pereira MC (2017) Resveratrol and grape extract-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 22, E277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Moussa C, Hebron M, Huang X, Ahn J, Rissman RA, Aisen PS, Turner RS (2017) Resveratrol regulates neuro-inflammation and induces adaptive immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 14, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Sarubbo F, Moranta D, Asensio VJ, Miralles A, Esteban S (2017) Effects of resveratrol and other polyphenols on the most common brain age-related diseases. Curr Med Chem 24, 4245–4266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.












