Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2020 Jan 1;76(Pt 1):38–41. doi: 10.1107/S205698901901627X

Crystal structure of the coordination polymer catena-poly[[[(acetonitrile-κN)copper(I)]-μ3-1,3-dithiolane-κ3 S:S:S′] hexafluoridophosphate]

Lena Knauer a, Michael Knorr b,*, Lydie Viau b, Carsten Strohmann a,*
PMCID: PMC6944091  PMID: 31921449

The title one-dimensional ribbon-like coordination polymer results from the reaction of [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] with 1,3-di­thiol­ane.

Keywords: crystal structure, copper complex, coordination polymer, thio­ether, C—H⋯F hydrogen bonding

Abstract

The polymeric title compound, [Cu2(C2H3N)2(C3H6S2)2](PF6)2, represents an example of a one-dimensional coordination polymer resulting from the reaction of [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] with 1,3-di­thiol­ane. The cationic one-dimensional ribbon consists of two copper(I) centers each ligated by one aceto­nitrile mol­ecule and inter­connected through two bridging 1,3-di­thiol­ane ligands. One S-donor site of each ligand is κ1-bound to Cu, whereas the second S atom acts as a four-electron donor, bridging two Cu atoms in a κ4-bonding mode. The positive charge of each copper cation is compensated for by a hexa­fluorido­phosphate counter-ion. In the crystal, the polymer chains are linked by a series of C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds, forming a supra­molecular framework.

Chemical context  

The five-membered heterocyclic ligand tetra­hydro­thio­phene (THT) is known to form a great variety of mol­ecular complexes and coordination polymers (CPs) with various transition metals. Notably, for the soft coinage metal ions copper(I), silver(I) and gold(I), numerous structurally characterized examples coordinated by terminal or bridging THT ligands have been documented (Ahrland et al., 1993 ▸; Dembo et al., 2010 ▸; Norén & Oskarsson, 1985 ▸; Mälger et al., 1992 ▸; Usón et al., 1984 ▸). Even mixed-valence (CuI–CuII) compounds such as polymeric penta-μ-chloro-tris-μ-tetra­hydro­thio­phene­tetra­copper(I,II) have been prepared (Ainscough et al., 1985 ▸). In the case of the five-membered heterocycle 1,2-di­thiol­ane, in which one CH2 unit is replaced by a second sulfur atom, there is one report on its coordination to Hg2(NO3)2 yielding the HgI adduct 1,2-di­thiol­ane·Hg2(NO3)2 (Brodersen & Rölz, 1977 ▸). Furthermore, the dinuclear organometallic species [η5-CpMn(CO)2(μ2-1,2-di­thiol­ane)]2 has been characterized crystallographically (Braunwarth et al., 1991 ▸). The fluxional complexes [M(CO)5(1,3-di­thiol­ane)] (M = Cr, Mo, W) ligated by the isomeric heterocycle 1,3-di­thiol­ane (1,3-di­thia­cyclo­penta­ne) have been investigated by NMR spectroscopy (Abel et al., 1990 ▸).

In a comparative study with respect to our previous work on the coordination chemistry of the open-chain di­thio­ether analogues RS-CH2-SR (Chaabéne et al., 2016 ▸; Knorr et al., 2014 ▸; Peindy et al., 2007 ▸) and in part to fill the gap between the versatile coordination chemistry of THT (see above) and the almost unexplored coordination chemistry of 1,3-di­thiol­ane, we recently described in detail the construction and structural features of mol­ecular clusters and coordination networks, with dimensionalities varying from 0D–2D by reacting 1,3-di­thiol­ane and its ferrocenyl derivative substituted at the 2-position with CuX salts (X = Cl, Br, I) (Raghuvanshi et al., 2017 ▸). However, surprisingly, a survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., 2016 ▸), reveals that apart from our CuX–1,3-di­thiol­ane compounds, no other unsubstituted 1,3-di­thiol­ane complexes have been structurally characterized. We have now extended our project on the coordination chemistry of this cyclic di­thio­ether using [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] as reactant to obtain the title polymeric ionic salt-like material, which could be inter­esting for electrochemical investigations.graphic file with name e-76-00038-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

We have previously described (Raghuvanshi et al., 2017 ▸), the structural features of the ribbon-like structures of compounds [{Cu(μ2-Br)}(μ2-L1)]n and [{Cu(μ2-Cl)}(μ2-L1)]n, formed upon treatment of CuBr and CuCl with 1,3-di­thiol­ane (L1). The title complex salt, a ribbon of composition [Cu(1,3-di­thiane)(MeCN)]n + (CP1) also results from the reaction of [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] with L1, but its architecture is quite different.

The mol­ecular structure of the asymmetric unit of the title complex is illustrated in Fig. 1 ▸, and selected bond lengths and bond angles are given in Table 1 ▸. The ribbon-like structure is built upon individual CuI atoms, each ligated by a datively bound MeCN ligand and inter­connected to the neighbouring metal centers by two bridging di­thiol­ane ligands (Fig. 2 ▸). Overall, the architecture of CP1 is quite reminiscent of that of the 1D polymeric tetra­fluorido­borate salt [Cu(1,3-di­thiane)(MeCN)]n + (Knaust & Keller, 2003 ▸). Nevertheless, there is one difference. Whereas the asymmetric unit of the latter salt (crystallizing in the ortho­rhom­bic Sohncke space group P212121) contains three unique copper(I) centers, that of CP1 (crystallizing in the ortho­rhom­bic non-centrosymmetric space group Pna21) contains only two unique CuI atoms. Each displays a CuNS3 four-coordinate environment; see Table 1 ▸ [L—Cu—L angles: 99.97 (7) to 119.47 (11)° for Cu1, and 99.29 (11) to 118.69 (4)° for Cu2]. The τ4 descriptor for fourfold coordination is = 0.89 for both atoms Cu1 and Cu2, indicating that each have a trigonal-pyramidal geometry (τ4 = 1 for a perfect tetra­hedral geometry, = 0 for a perfect square planar geometry and = 0.85 for a perfect trigonal-pyramidal geometry; Yang et al., 2007 ▸).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A view of the asymmetric unit of the title compound, with atom labelling [symmetry codes: (i) x − Inline graphic, −y + Inline graphic, z; (ii) x + Inline graphic, −y + Inline graphic, z]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Cu1—N1 1.973 (3) Cu2—N2 1.980 (3)
Cu1—S1 2.2630 (10) Cu2—S3 2.2886 (11)
Cu1—S2i 2.3305 (9) Cu2—S4i 2.3281 (9)
Cu1—S4i 2.3367 (11) Cu2—S2 2.3357 (11)
       
N1—Cu1—S1 119.47 (11) N2—Cu2—S4i 99.29 (11)
N1—Cu1—S2i 99.97 (9) S3—Cu2—S4i 118.69 (4)
S1—Cu1—S2i 115.68 (4) N2—Cu2—S2 106.03 (13)
N1—Cu1—S4i 105.68 (12) S3—Cu2—S2 115.99 (4)
S1—Cu1—S4i 110.65 (4) S4i—Cu2—S2 102.03 (4)
S2i—Cu1—S4i 103.69 (4) Cu1ii—S2—Cu2 111.28 (4)
N2—Cu2—S3 112.75 (12) Cu2ii—S4—Cu1ii 104.54 (4)
Open in a new tab

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A partial view along the b axis of the crystal packing of the title compound. For clarity, the H atoms and the PF6 − anions have been omitted.

The coordination environment for each of the CuI centers includes three bridging di­thiol­ane ligands and one terminal aceto­nitrile ligand. All Cu—S bond lengths are in the range 2.2630 (10)–2.3367 (11) Å, the mean Cu—S bond length of 2.314 (12) Å is quite similar to that in [Cu(1,3-di­thiane)(MeCN)]n +. In addition, the mean Cu—N bond distance matches well with that of [Cu(1,3-di­thiane)(MeCN)]n [1.979 (4) versus 1.984 (7) Å]. The three di­thiol­ane ligands each have one S atom that is a two-electron donor and one S atom that is a μ2-four-electron donor. The Cu⋯Cu separations of ca 3.689–3.852 Å are far above the sum of the van der Waals radii of two Cu atoms (2.8 Å), excluding any bonding inter­action. These two bonding modes lead to the formation of a ribbon-like coordination polymer, which runs parallel to the a axis, where each copper(I) center is bonded to two μ2-S atoms and one μ1-S atom (Fig. 2 ▸ and Table 1 ▸).

Supra­molecular features  

The crystal packing of the title compound is illustrated in Fig. 3 ▸, and shows the ribbon-like structures, propagating along the a-axis direction, that are linked by a number of C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds, forming a supra­molecular framework (Fig. 3 ▸ and Table 2 ▸).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A view along the a axis of the crystal packing of the title compound. The C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds (Table 2 ▸) are shown as dashed lines. For clarity, only the H atoms involved in these inter­actions have been included.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
C1—H1A⋯F9iii 0.99 2.55 3.264 (4) 129
C1—H1A⋯F12iii 0.99 2.40 3.277 (5) 147
C2—H2A⋯F9iii 0.99 2.50 3.287 (5) 136
C3—H3B⋯F4ii 0.99 2.42 3.376 (5) 161
C5—H5C⋯F6iv 0.98 2.54 3.426 (6) 151
C8—H8A⋯F11 0.99 2.34 3.186 (5) 143
C8—H8B⋯F2v 0.99 2.46 3.323 (5) 145
C10—H10A⋯F7ii 0.99 2.31 3.221 (5) 152
C10—H10B⋯F1ii 0.99 2.48 3.264 (5) 136
Open in a new tab

Symmetry codes: (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic.

Database survey  

Other examples of crystallographically characterized 1,3-di­thiol­ane complexes substituted at the 2-position found in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.40, update August 2019; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) include catena-[(μ5-1,3-di­thiol­ane-2-carboxyl­ato)(μ4-1,3-di­thiol­ane-2-carboxyl­ato)(μ2-tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonato-O,O′)tris­ilver(I)] (CSD refcode FAQIPY; Gondi et al., 2011 ▸), catena-[(μ3-1,3-di­thiol­ane-2-methanol-S,S,S′)(nitrato-O)silver(I)] (HESLUN; Zhang et al., 2006 ▸), chloro­tri­phenyl­phosphine[2,5-bis­(1,3-di­thio­lan-2-yl)phen­yl-S]palladium(II) (IVUFEK; Vicente et al., 2004 ▸), rac-trans-di­chloro­bis­{[2-(1,3-di­thio­lan-2-yl)phen­yl](diphen­yl)phos­phine}ruthenium(II) chloro­form solvate (TUMKOC; Bayly et al., 2009 ▸). Other examples of related 1,3-di­thiane copper(I) coordination polymers have also been reported (Raghuvanshi et al., 2019 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization  

The reaction scheme for the synthesis of the title compound is illustrated in Fig. 4 ▸. To a solution of [Cu(MeCN)4][PF6] (372 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 ml) was added an equimolar amount of 1,3-di­thiol­ane (L1) via a syringe. The solution was stirred at 293 K for 2 h, then layered with Et2O (10 ml) and stored in a refrigerator for 2 days. Colourless block-like crystals formed progressively (245 mg, 68% yield).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Reaction scheme for the synthesis of the title compound, CP1.

Elemental analysis calculated for C10H18Cu2F12N2P2S4: C, 16.88; H, 2.54; N, 3.94; S, 18.03%. Found: C, 16.44; H, 2.28; N, 3.44; S, 17.81%. IR (ATR; cm−1): 2280 w (weak) (CN), 835 vs (very strong) (PF6).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The C-bound H atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding: C—H = 0.98–0.99 Å with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C-meth­yl) and 1.2U eq(C) for other H atoms. The structure was refined as a two-component inversion twin; BASF = 0.121 (12). In the final cycles of refinement three reflections were omitted; one was affected by the backstop and two were most disagreeable reflections.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Cu2(C2H3N)2(C3H6S2)2] (PF6)2
M r 711.52
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P n a21
Temperature (K) 105
a, b, c (Å) 11.8409 (9), 12.9273 (9), 15.2921 (11)
V (Å3) 2340.8 (3)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 2.41
Crystal size (mm) 0.33 × 0.32 × 0.27
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 VENTURE area detector
Absorption correction Multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2016 ▸)
T min, T max 0.608, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 40393, 8122, 7092
R int 0.040
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.769
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.034, 0.080, 1.03
No. of reflections 8122
No. of parameters 293
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.93, −0.73
Open in a new tab

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) Global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901901627X/su5530sup1.cif

e-76-00038-sup1.cif (1.2MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901901627X/su5530Isup2.hkl

e-76-00038-Isup2.hkl (645KB, hkl)
Click here for additional data file. (5.5KB, cdx)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901901627X/su5530Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 1969688

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

Lena Knauer would like to thank the ‘Fonds der Chemischen Industrie’ for a doctoral fellowship.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Cu2(C2H3N)2(C3H6S2)2](PF6)2 Dx = 2.019 Mg m−3
Mr = 711.52 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pna21 Cell parameters from 9565 reflections
a = 11.8409 (9) Å θ = 2.7–31.8°
b = 12.9273 (9) Å µ = 2.41 mm−1
c = 15.2921 (11) Å T = 105 K
V = 2340.8 (3) Å3 Block, colourless
Z = 4 0.33 × 0.32 × 0.27 mm
F(000) = 1408
Open in a new tab

Data collection

Bruker D8 VENTURE area detector diffractometer 8122 independent reflections
Radiation source: microfocus sealed X-ray tube, Incoatec Iµs 7092 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
HELIOS mirror optics monochromator Rint = 0.040
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1 θmax = 33.1°, θmin = 2.3°
ω and φ scans h = −17→17
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2016) k = −19→18
Tmin = 0.608, Tmax = 0.746 l = −21→23
40393 measured reflections
Open in a new tab

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0388P)2 + 1.7169P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.080 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.03 Δρmax = 0.93 e Å−3
8122 reflections Δρmin = −0.73 e Å−3
293 parameters Extinction correction: (SHELXL-2018/3; Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraint Extinction coefficient: 0.0012 (3)
Primary atom site location: dual Absolute structure: Refined as an inversion twin.
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map Absolute structure parameter: 0.115 (11)
Open in a new tab

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a two-component inversion twin
Open in a new tab

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.84315 (3) 0.78973 (3) 0.57850 (3) 0.01740 (10)
Cu2 0.59217 (4) 0.80128 (3) 0.43586 (3) 0.01907 (10)
S1 0.73437 (7) 0.71169 (7) 0.68074 (6) 0.01758 (17)
S2 0.53256 (7) 0.75921 (6) 0.57705 (6) 0.01552 (15)
S3 0.47858 (7) 0.74560 (8) 0.32430 (7) 0.02113 (18)
S4 0.28017 (7) 0.75139 (6) 0.43792 (6) 0.01688 (16)
N1 0.8599 (3) 0.9416 (2) 0.5802 (3) 0.0218 (6)
N2 0.6146 (3) 0.9531 (3) 0.4352 (3) 0.0271 (7)
C1 0.6181 (3) 0.6541 (3) 0.6216 (3) 0.0176 (6)
H1A 0.572111 0.610665 0.661277 0.021*
H1B 0.646981 0.609859 0.573648 0.021*
C2 0.6454 (3) 0.8120 (3) 0.7273 (3) 0.0216 (7)
H2A 0.595280 0.781936 0.772430 0.026*
H2B 0.692894 0.865649 0.755319 0.026*
C3 0.5748 (3) 0.8604 (3) 0.6548 (3) 0.0229 (8)
H3A 0.619383 0.914115 0.624196 0.027*
H3B 0.506878 0.893506 0.680033 0.027*
C4 0.8973 (3) 1.0220 (3) 0.5899 (3) 0.0233 (7)
C5 0.9471 (4) 1.1236 (3) 0.6047 (3) 0.0337 (10)
H5A 1.026569 1.122572 0.586966 0.051*
H5B 0.941772 1.141126 0.666932 0.051*
H5C 0.906273 1.175400 0.570202 0.051*
C6 0.6404 (4) 1.0373 (4) 0.4332 (4) 0.0384 (10)
C7 0.6757 (8) 1.1462 (5) 0.4299 (6) 0.081 (3)
H7A 0.631809 1.182650 0.385163 0.122*
H7B 0.756221 1.150048 0.415362 0.122*
H7C 0.662709 1.178524 0.486982 0.122*
C8 0.3636 (3) 0.6684 (3) 0.3662 (3) 0.0212 (7)
H8A 0.393246 0.608356 0.399149 0.025*
H8B 0.316389 0.642406 0.317440 0.025*
C9 0.3864 (3) 0.8562 (3) 0.3071 (3) 0.0250 (8)
H9A 0.431480 0.917698 0.290743 0.030*
H9B 0.332220 0.841488 0.259437 0.030*
C10 0.3233 (3) 0.8761 (3) 0.3924 (3) 0.0241 (8)
H10A 0.256090 0.919716 0.381185 0.029*
H10B 0.372927 0.912903 0.434195 0.029*
P1 0.83561 (9) 0.41114 (8) 0.64167 (8) 0.0243 (2)
F1 0.8514 (2) 0.5141 (2) 0.5834 (2) 0.0352 (6)
F2 0.8195 (2) 0.3098 (2) 0.7025 (2) 0.0381 (7)
F3 0.9652 (2) 0.3807 (2) 0.6263 (2) 0.0400 (6)
F4 0.8733 (3) 0.4757 (2) 0.72667 (18) 0.0373 (6)
F5 0.7068 (2) 0.4413 (2) 0.6591 (3) 0.0478 (8)
F6 0.8011 (3) 0.3459 (3) 0.5585 (2) 0.0564 (10)
P2 0.56386 (9) 0.42170 (8) 0.34899 (7) 0.0242 (2)
F7 0.6297 (4) 0.5004 (3) 0.2875 (2) 0.0639 (11)
F8 0.4947 (4) 0.3435 (3) 0.4073 (2) 0.0765 (14)
F9 0.5737 (2) 0.3338 (2) 0.27453 (18) 0.0295 (5)
F10 0.6798 (2) 0.3850 (2) 0.3895 (2) 0.0402 (7)
F11 0.5557 (2) 0.5097 (2) 0.4233 (2) 0.0394 (7)
F12 0.4494 (3) 0.4601 (3) 0.3056 (3) 0.0836 (17)
Open in a new tab

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.01103 (17) 0.02016 (19) 0.0210 (2) −0.00064 (14) 0.00107 (16) −0.00060 (19)
Cu2 0.01171 (18) 0.0229 (2) 0.0226 (2) −0.00045 (15) 0.00019 (17) 0.00155 (19)
S1 0.0107 (3) 0.0221 (4) 0.0200 (4) 0.0000 (3) −0.0009 (3) 0.0023 (3)
S2 0.0092 (3) 0.0186 (3) 0.0188 (4) 0.0002 (3) 0.0004 (3) 0.0008 (4)
S3 0.0130 (4) 0.0303 (4) 0.0201 (4) 0.0001 (3) 0.0025 (3) −0.0025 (4)
S4 0.0098 (3) 0.0221 (4) 0.0187 (4) 0.0007 (3) 0.0008 (3) 0.0005 (4)
N1 0.0211 (14) 0.0210 (13) 0.0232 (15) 0.0036 (11) 0.0000 (14) −0.0005 (14)
N2 0.0294 (17) 0.0244 (14) 0.0275 (16) −0.0013 (13) −0.0028 (17) 0.0032 (16)
C1 0.0109 (13) 0.0188 (15) 0.0232 (17) 0.0004 (12) −0.0012 (13) 0.0041 (13)
C2 0.0162 (16) 0.0276 (17) 0.0210 (18) −0.0007 (13) 0.0018 (13) −0.0030 (15)
C3 0.0167 (16) 0.0221 (16) 0.030 (2) 0.0020 (13) −0.0030 (14) −0.0058 (15)
C4 0.0253 (18) 0.0239 (17) 0.0208 (18) 0.0042 (14) −0.0024 (15) −0.0012 (15)
C5 0.044 (3) 0.0210 (18) 0.036 (2) −0.0023 (17) −0.010 (2) −0.0038 (17)
C6 0.050 (3) 0.030 (2) 0.036 (2) −0.0020 (19) −0.009 (2) 0.006 (2)
C7 0.115 (7) 0.031 (3) 0.097 (6) −0.017 (3) −0.028 (6) 0.022 (4)
C8 0.0131 (15) 0.0248 (17) 0.026 (2) −0.0002 (13) 0.0027 (13) −0.0048 (15)
C9 0.0189 (17) 0.032 (2) 0.0241 (19) −0.0009 (14) −0.0017 (14) 0.0094 (16)
C10 0.0189 (17) 0.0233 (17) 0.030 (2) 0.0052 (14) 0.0044 (15) 0.0058 (15)
P1 0.0237 (5) 0.0215 (4) 0.0276 (5) 0.0015 (4) −0.0041 (4) 0.0034 (4)
F1 0.0441 (15) 0.0313 (12) 0.0302 (13) 0.0015 (11) −0.0016 (13) 0.0093 (12)
F2 0.0352 (14) 0.0288 (13) 0.0505 (18) 0.0056 (11) 0.0069 (13) 0.0147 (12)
F3 0.0305 (13) 0.0460 (15) 0.0434 (16) 0.0103 (12) 0.0071 (12) 0.0068 (14)
F4 0.0461 (16) 0.0389 (14) 0.0269 (13) −0.0004 (13) −0.0021 (13) −0.0024 (11)
F5 0.0238 (13) 0.0352 (14) 0.084 (3) 0.0063 (11) −0.0003 (14) 0.0167 (16)
F6 0.080 (3) 0.0400 (16) 0.049 (2) 0.0039 (16) −0.0306 (18) −0.0073 (14)
P2 0.0207 (4) 0.0254 (5) 0.0267 (5) 0.0014 (4) −0.0027 (4) −0.0060 (4)
F7 0.125 (3) 0.0390 (17) 0.0273 (15) −0.034 (2) −0.010 (2) 0.0043 (13)
F8 0.089 (3) 0.086 (3) 0.054 (2) −0.059 (2) 0.040 (2) −0.024 (2)
F9 0.0261 (12) 0.0282 (11) 0.0341 (14) 0.0008 (10) −0.0020 (10) −0.0097 (11)
F10 0.0383 (15) 0.0422 (15) 0.0400 (16) 0.0129 (13) −0.0168 (13) −0.0089 (13)
F11 0.0354 (14) 0.0431 (14) 0.0397 (17) 0.0112 (12) −0.0089 (12) −0.0241 (13)
F12 0.061 (2) 0.093 (3) 0.097 (3) 0.052 (2) −0.053 (2) −0.069 (3)
Open in a new tab

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Cu1—N1 1.973 (3) C5—H5A 0.9800
Cu1—S1 2.2630 (10) C5—H5B 0.9800
Cu1—S2i 2.3305 (9) C5—H5C 0.9800
Cu1—S4i 2.3367 (11) C6—C7 1.469 (7)
Cu2—N2 1.980 (3) C7—H7A 0.9800
Cu2—S3 2.2886 (11) C7—H7B 0.9800
Cu2—S4i 2.3281 (9) C7—H7C 0.9800
Cu2—S2 2.3357 (11) C8—H8A 0.9900
S1—C1 1.808 (4) C8—H8B 0.9900
S1—C2 1.817 (4) C9—C10 1.524 (6)
S2—C1 1.827 (4) C9—H9A 0.9900
S2—C3 1.836 (4) C9—H9B 0.9900
S3—C8 1.806 (4) C10—H10A 0.9900
S3—C9 1.817 (4) C10—H10B 0.9900
S4—C8 1.825 (4) P1—F6 1.579 (3)
S4—C10 1.830 (4) P1—F5 1.597 (3)
N1—C4 1.140 (5) P1—F3 1.602 (3)
N2—C6 1.132 (6) P1—F4 1.608 (3)
C1—H1A 0.9900 P1—F1 1.613 (3)
C1—H1B 0.9900 P1—F2 1.617 (3)
C2—C3 1.523 (6) P2—F8 1.577 (4)
C2—H2A 0.9900 P2—F10 1.579 (3)
C2—H2B 0.9900 P2—F12 1.588 (3)
C3—H3A 0.9900 P2—F7 1.590 (4)
C3—H3B 0.9900 P2—F11 1.611 (3)
C4—C5 1.456 (6) P2—F9 1.613 (3)
N1—Cu1—S1 119.47 (11) H5B—C5—H5C 109.5
N1—Cu1—S2i 99.97 (9) N2—C6—C7 179.0 (7)
S1—Cu1—S2i 115.68 (4) C6—C7—H7A 109.5
N1—Cu1—S4i 105.68 (12) C6—C7—H7B 109.5
S1—Cu1—S4i 110.65 (4) H7A—C7—H7B 109.5
S2i—Cu1—S4i 103.69 (4) C6—C7—H7C 109.5
N2—Cu2—S3 112.75 (12) H7A—C7—H7C 109.5
N2—Cu2—S4i 99.29 (11) H7B—C7—H7C 109.5
S3—Cu2—S4i 118.69 (4) S3—C8—S4 107.2 (2)
N2—Cu2—S2 106.03 (13) S3—C8—H8A 110.3
S3—Cu2—S2 115.99 (4) S4—C8—H8A 110.3
S4i—Cu2—S2 102.03 (4) S3—C8—H8B 110.3
C1—S1—C2 92.80 (17) S4—C8—H8B 110.3
C1—S1—Cu1 105.74 (13) H8A—C8—H8B 108.5
C2—S1—Cu1 106.41 (13) C10—C9—S3 107.7 (3)
C1—S2—C3 97.91 (17) C10—C9—H9A 110.2
C1—S2—Cu1ii 109.15 (11) S3—C9—H9A 110.2
C3—S2—Cu1ii 116.70 (13) C10—C9—H9B 110.2
C1—S2—Cu2 110.50 (13) S3—C9—H9B 110.2
C3—S2—Cu2 110.50 (14) H9A—C9—H9B 108.5
Cu1ii—S2—Cu2 111.28 (4) C9—C10—S4 108.2 (3)
C8—S3—C9 91.90 (18) C9—C10—H10A 110.0
C8—S3—Cu2 110.66 (14) S4—C10—H10A 110.0
C9—S3—Cu2 102.31 (14) C9—C10—H10B 110.0
C8—S4—C10 97.95 (18) S4—C10—H10B 110.0
C8—S4—Cu2ii 109.72 (13) H10A—C10—H10B 108.4
C10—S4—Cu2ii 121.31 (13) F6—P1—F5 91.0 (2)
C8—S4—Cu1ii 104.29 (13) F6—P1—F3 89.9 (2)
C10—S4—Cu1ii 117.50 (15) F5—P1—F3 178.8 (2)
Cu2ii—S4—Cu1ii 104.54 (4) F6—P1—F4 178.58 (19)
C4—N1—Cu1 161.5 (3) F5—P1—F4 90.19 (18)
C6—N2—Cu2 172.0 (4) F3—P1—F4 88.87 (17)
S1—C1—S2 107.58 (19) F6—P1—F1 91.48 (18)
S1—C1—H1A 110.2 F5—P1—F1 90.12 (16)
S2—C1—H1A 110.2 F3—P1—F1 90.55 (16)
S1—C1—H1B 110.2 F4—P1—F1 89.24 (16)
S2—C1—H1B 110.2 F6—P1—F2 89.98 (19)
H1A—C1—H1B 108.5 F5—P1—F2 89.37 (16)
C3—C2—S1 109.0 (3) F3—P1—F2 89.94 (15)
C3—C2—H2A 109.9 F4—P1—F2 89.31 (17)
S1—C2—H2A 109.9 F1—P1—F2 178.46 (18)
C3—C2—H2B 109.9 F8—P2—F10 92.1 (2)
S1—C2—H2B 109.9 F8—P2—F12 89.6 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B 108.3 F10—P2—F12 178.1 (3)
C2—C3—S2 109.2 (3) F8—P2—F7 177.8 (2)
C2—C3—H3A 109.8 F10—P2—F7 89.9 (2)
S2—C3—H3A 109.8 F12—P2—F7 88.4 (3)
C2—C3—H3B 109.8 F8—P2—F11 91.27 (19)
S2—C3—H3B 109.8 F10—P2—F11 89.26 (15)
H3A—C3—H3B 108.3 F12—P2—F11 91.32 (16)
N1—C4—C5 178.2 (5) F7—P2—F11 89.70 (18)
C4—C5—H5A 109.5 F8—P2—F9 89.15 (17)
C4—C5—H5B 109.5 F10—P2—F9 90.17 (15)
H5A—C5—H5B 109.5 F12—P2—F9 89.25 (16)
C4—C5—H5C 109.5 F7—P2—F9 89.90 (17)
H5A—C5—H5C 109.5 F11—P2—F9 179.30 (16)
C2—S1—C1—S2 40.7 (2) C9—S3—C8—S4 −41.9 (2)
Cu1—S1—C1—S2 −67.21 (18) Cu2—S3—C8—S4 62.0 (2)
C3—S2—C1—S1 −23.4 (2) C10—S4—C8—S3 22.5 (2)
Cu1ii—S2—C1—S1 −145.34 (13) Cu2ii—S4—C8—S3 149.92 (14)
Cu2—S2—C1—S1 91.98 (18) Cu1ii—S4—C8—S3 −98.58 (18)
C1—S1—C2—C3 −48.2 (3) C8—S3—C9—C10 51.8 (3)
Cu1—S1—C2—C3 59.1 (3) Cu2—S3—C9—C10 −59.9 (3)
S1—C2—C3—S2 37.2 (3) S3—C9—C10—S4 −41.7 (3)
C1—S2—C3—C2 −8.0 (3) C8—S4—C10—C9 11.4 (3)
Cu1ii—S2—C3—C2 108.1 (2) Cu2ii—S4—C10—C9 −107.6 (2)
Cu2—S2—C3—C2 −123.5 (2) Cu1ii—S4—C10—C9 122.1 (3)
Open in a new tab

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z; (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C1—H1A···F9iii 0.99 2.55 3.264 (4) 129
C1—H1A···F12iii 0.99 2.40 3.277 (5) 147
C2—H2A···F9iii 0.99 2.50 3.287 (5) 136
C3—H3B···F4ii 0.99 2.42 3.376 (5) 161
C5—H5C···F6iv 0.98 2.54 3.426 (6) 151
C8—H8A···F11 0.99 2.34 3.186 (5) 143
C8—H8B···F2v 0.99 2.46 3.323 (5) 145
C10—H10A···F7ii 0.99 2.31 3.221 (5) 152
C10—H10B···F1ii 0.99 2.48 3.264 (5) 136
Open in a new tab

Symmetry codes: (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z; (v) −x+1, −y+1, z−1/2.

References

  1. Abel, E. W., Orrell, K. G., Qureshi, K. B. & Šik, V. (1990). Polyhedron, 9, 703–711.
  2. Ahrland, S., Dreisch, K., Norén, B. & Oskarsson, A. (1993). Mater. Chem. Phys. 35, 281–289.
  3. Ainscough, E. W., Brodie, A. M., Husbands, J. M., Gainsford, G. J., Gabe, E. J. & Curtis, N. F. (1985). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 151–158.
  4. Bayly, S. R., Cowley, A. R., Dilworth, J. R. & Ward, C. V. (2009). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3807–3813.
  5. Braunwarth, H., Lau, P., Huttner, V., Minelli, M., Günauer, D., Zsolnai, V., Jibril, I. & Evertz, V. (1991). J. Organomet. Chem. 411, 383–394.
  6. Brodersen, K. & Rölz, W. (1977). Chem. Ber. 110, 1042–1046.
  7. Bruker (2016). APEX2, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  8. Chaabéne, M., Khatyr, A., Knorr, M., Askri, M., Rousselin, Y. & Kubicki, M. M. (2016). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 451, 177–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Dembo, M. D., Dunaway, L. E., Jones, J. S., Lepekhina, E. A., McCullough, S. M., Ming, J. L., Li, X., Baril-Robert, F., Patterson, H. H., Bayse, C. A. & Pike, R. D. (2010). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 364, 102–114.
  10. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  11. Gondi, S. R., Zhang, H. & Son, D. Y. (2011). J. Sulfur Chem. 32, 17–21.
  12. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Knaust, J. M. & Keller, S. W. (2003). CrystEngComm, 5, 459–465.
  14. Knorr, M., Khatyr, A., Dini Aleo, A., El Yaagoubi, A., Strohmann, C., Kubicki, M. M., Rousselin, Y., Aly, S. M., Fortin, D., Lapprand, A. & Harvey, P. D. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 5373–5387.
  15. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  16. Mälger, H., Olbrich, F., Kopf, J., Abeln, D. & Weiss, E. (1992). Z. Naturforsch. B, 47, 1276–1280.
  17. Norén, B. & Oskarsson, Å. (1985). Acta Chem. Scand. 39a, 701–709.
  18. Peindy, H. N., Guyon, F., Khatyr, A., Knorr, M. & Strohmann, C. (2007). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1823–1828.
  19. Raghuvanshi, A., Dargallay, N. J., Knorr, M., Viau, L., Knauer, L. & Strohmann, C. (2017). J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 27, 1501–1513.
  20. Raghuvanshi, A., Knorr, M., Knauer, L., Strohmann, C., Boullanger, S., Moutarlier, V. & Viau, L. (2019). Inorg. Chem. 58, 5753–5775. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  22. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  23. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Usón, R., Laguna, A., Laguna, M., Manzano, B. R., Jones, P. G. & Sheldrick, G. M. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 285–292.
  25. Vicente, J., Abad, J.-A., Hernández-Mata, F. S., Rink, B., Jones, P. G. & Ramírez de Arellano, M. C. (2004). Organometallics, 23, 1292–1304.
  26. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.
  27. Yang, L., Powell, D. R. & Houser, R. P. (2007). Dalton Trans. pp. 955–964. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, H., Gondi, S. R. & Son, D. Y. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m3086–m3088.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) Global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901901627X/su5530sup1.cif

e-76-00038-sup1.cif (1.2MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901901627X/su5530Isup2.hkl

e-76-00038-Isup2.hkl (645KB, hkl)
Click here for additional data file. (5.5KB, cdx)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901901627X/su5530Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 1969688

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES