Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2019 Oct 17;8:1771. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20645.1

Case Report: Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (Seidlmayer purpura) – a dramatic presentation for a benign disease

Elena Carboni 1, Maria Scavone 1, Ettore Stefanelli 1, Valentina Talarico 2,a, Stefania Zampogna 2, Maria Concetta Galati 3, Giuseppe Raiola 2
PMCID: PMC6944248  PMID: 31942241

Abstract

We present a case of an 11-month-old girl who was referred to our unit for an erythematous rash that appeared on the face and extremities. Personal and family history was not relevant. Laboratory tests were normal. During recovery, diameter and colour intensity of the cutaneous lesions increased, but after some weeks, lesions had a self-limited resolution without any treatment. Based on clinical and laboratory findings, a diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) was made.  AHEI is a rare cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis that usually affects children aged between 4 and 24 months. Etiology is unknown but almost of 75% of cases are preceded by infectious episodes, vaccinations or use of medications. In contrast to the dramatic cutaneous eruption, clinical conditions are usually optimal. Classically, AHEI is characterized by a triad of symptoms: fever, edema and purpura. Skin lesions are erythematous, annular, medallion-like, purpuric plaques that have a rapid onset and appear on the face and extremities, sparing trunk and mucosal membranes. Initially interpreted as a variant of Henoch-Schönlein purpura, now it is considered a distinct disease. In the majority of cases the disease is benign and self-limited without a visceral involvement, so a conservative approach is most often chosen.

Keywords: edema, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Seidlmayer purpura, erythematous rash, children

Introduction

Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI), also known as Seidlmayer purpura, is a rare cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. It was described for the first time in 1913 and currently there are more than 300 cases in the literature 1. Initially it has been interpreted as a Henoch-Schönlein purpura variant, but now it is considered a distinct disease. Although it has a dramatic clinical presentation, it is a benign and self-limited disease 2. We report the case of an 11-month-old girl who was referred to our unit for an erythematous rash appeared on the face and extremities, which was indicative of a rare but non negligible diagnosis.

Case presentation

An 11-month-old girl from France presented with fever and oval purpuric lesions on the face and extremities, which had appeared one hour before. In the previous week, she had bilateral conjunctivitis and gastroenteritis, treated with oral rehydration. At admission she was in good clinical condition and her vital signs were normal. Physical examination showed purpuric confluent elements with a cockade pattern on cheeks, left auricle, upper and lower limbs, particularly on distal ends, sparing trunk and back ( Figure 1). Hands appeared edematous without joint swelling or tenderness. Bilateral conjunctivitis was still present. No other physical abnormalities were observed. Complete blood count, extended biochemistry, coagulation tests (prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and D-dimer) and urinalysis were normal with C-reactive protein of 18.9 mg/l (normal value <5 mg/l) and procalcitonin of 0.88 ng/ml (normal value <0.05 ng/ml). During the hospitalization the child maintained good clinical condition, with stable vital parameters. Dermatological lesions showed a worsening clinical outcome, with increased diameter and colour intensity during the following three days from admission. Based on clinical and laboratory findings, a diagnosis of AHEI was made. We decided to not perform any therapy and after about two weeks lesions had a self-limited resolution. The child was monitored clinically for about six months and she did not present any relapse of the disease during the follow-up period.

Figure 1. Cutaneous presentation of acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy in our case.

Figure 1.

( a) Ecchymotic target-like skin lesions with edema of the hand. ( b) Purpuric confluent elements with a cockade pattern on the lower limbs.

Discussion

The first description of AHEI was made by Snow in 1913 1. There have been approximately 300 cases reported in the literature 2 under a variety of denominations: Seidlmayer purpura, Finkelstein disease, rosette form purpura, medallion-like purpura, infantile post-infectious iris-like purpura and edema 3. AHEI is a rare cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis that usually affects children aged between 4 and 24 months and it is more common in males 2, 4. Most cases of AHEI occur during winter, and almost of 75% of cases are preceded by infectious episodes, such as viral and bacterial infections of the upper respiratory tract, otitis media, conjunctivitis, bronchopneumonia, urinary tract infections and enteritis. Many organisms including adenovirus, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, rotavirus, herpes simplex virus, tuberculosis, streptococci, and staphylococci are associated with AHEI. Vaccinations or medications could also trigger AHEI 5. In this case, the patient had a week-long history of bilateral conjunctivitis and gastroenteritis, compatible with a recent viral infection. A peculiar feature of AHEI is the unusual dramatic cutaneous eruption that contrasts with good general clinical condition (normal vital parameters with normal blood tests) that allowed to exclude more serious diseases. Diagnosis is clinical and it is classically detectable by observance of the clinical triad of symptoms: fever, edema and purpura 6. Skin lesions are erythematous, annular, medallion-like, rosette-shaped purpuric plaques that cluster and often coalesce 3. These lesions have a rapid onset and appear on face and extremities, sparing trunk and mucosal membranes 3, 4. The edema typically occurs on feet, hands, face and auricles, and can involve the scrotum in males 2, 7. In the majority of cases there is no visceral involvement and the disease is benign and self-limited. However, in the literature there are descriptions of cases of renal involvement, arthralgias and two cases of intestinal involvement followed by intussusception 2.

Krause et al. suggested the following criteria for diagnosing AHEI 8:

  • -

    Age <2 years;

  • -

    Purpuric or ecchymotic target-like skin lesions with edema on the head and face, with or without mucosal involvement;

  • -

    Lack of systemic disease or visceral involvement;

  • -

    Spontaneous recovery within few days or weeks.

Our patient presented all of the above conditions. Laboratory data are usually normal, but leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, eosinophilia and high levels of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate can be observed 7. Skin biopsy shows a leukocytoclastic vasculitis of the small dermal vessels characterized by infiltration of perivascular neutrophils, showing fragmentation of nuclei, resulting in fibrinoid necrosis 9. Differential diagnoses include urticaria, erythema multiforme, idiopathic thrombocytopenia, meningococcemia, Kawasaki disease, Sweet syndrome, Gianotti-Crosti disease, drug-induced vasculitis, child abuse and trauma-induced purpura, but Henoch-Schönlein purpura is probably the most important 9, 10. Initially interpreted as a variant of Henoch-Schnölein purpura, now it is considered a distinct disease with different epidemiological, clinical and pathological features 4.

Treatment of AHEI remains controversial; conservative management is the most frequently approach, because this disease is a self-limited condition 4, 7, 9. AHEI certainly represents a challenge for the pediatrician at the emergency department and it requires, at least initially, a high level of suspicion for potentially serious pathologies that need adequate, urgent treatment such as for infectious (meningococcemia) or hematological diseases (autoimmune thrombocytopenia, coagulopathies). In fact, in our case some easily laboratory tests, such as complete blood count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, D-dimer, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests were supportive in the rapid exclusion of these conditions. This approach, together with the typical benign course of the AHEI, quickly guaranteed the exclusion of these conditions, avoiding the execution of unnecessary and/or invasive diagnostic procedures and unrequired therapies.

We reported this case because it is expression of a rare and often under-recognized disease by pediatricians. A typical feature of AHEI is the discrepancy between dramatic cutaneous involvement and good clinical conditions of the affected children. This characteristic can reassure clinicians about the absence of a serious medical condition, but it is possible only through the knowledge of the disease.

Conclusion

We describe a case of AHEI with striking cutaneous involvement that resolved spontaneously. AHEI is an uncommon disease, often under-recognized. For this reason, it is crucial that physicians have the skill to recognize this self-limited disease to avoid parental anxiety and inappropriate procedures or therapies.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Consent

We received written informed consent from the patient’s family for the publication of this manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. Snow IM: Purpura, urticaria and angioneurotic edema of the hands and feet in a nursing baby. JAMA. 1913;61(1):18–9. 10.1001/jama.1913.04350010020008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fiore E, Rizzi M, Ragazzi M, et al. : Acute hemorrhagic edema of young children (cockade purpura and edema): a case series and systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(4):684–695. 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Homme JL, Block JM: Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy and common mimics. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(5):936.e3–6. 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.09.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cunha DF, Darcie AL, Benevides GN, et al. : Acute Hemorrhagic Edema of Infancy: an unusual diagnosis for the general pediatrician. Autopsy Case Rep. 2015;5(3):37–41. 10.4322/acr.2015.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Fotis L, Nikorelou S, Lariou MS, et al. : Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy: a frightening but benign disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(4):391–3. 10.1177/0009922810396549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Miorin E, Meneghini A, Don B, et al. : Edema emorragico acuto del lattante, descrizione di un caso clinico e revisione della letteratura. Medico e Bambino pagine elettroniche. 2002;5(3). Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Alhammadi AH, Adel A, Hendaus MA: Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy: a worrisome presentation, but benign course. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:197–9. 10.2147/CCID.S51525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Krause I, Lazarov A, Rachmel A, et al. : Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy, a benign variant of leucocytoclastic vasculitis. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85(1):114–7. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb13904.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Savino F, Lupica MM, Tarasco V, et al. : Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy: a troubling cutaneous presentation with a self-limiting course. Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30(6):e149–52. 10.1111/pde.12004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tagliabue A, Bettinelli A, Cogliati F: Edema acuto emorragico della prima infanzia (porpora di seidlmayer). Medico e Bambino pagine elettroniche. 2009;12(6). Reference Source [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.22706.r57605

Reviewer response for version 1

Antonio Francesco Urbino 1

The case report is interesting, well written and provides complete information for paediatricians who have never met the acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy in their practice. 

Just a few minor observations:

  1. The acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy is more known as Finkelstein disease than as Seidlmayer purpura: I suggest to change the eponym both in the introduction and in the keywords.

  2. The French origin of the girl does not influence the diagnosis and is redundant: please remove it.

  3. In the discussion section, Finkelstein disease is said to be distinguished from Gianotti-Crosti disease, whose papular and not usually purpuric presentation is quite different: I suggest to remove it.

      

  4. Authors state the the Finkelstein disease is more frequent in winter time: when did the girl arrived in the Emergency Department?

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2019 Dec 9. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.22706.r57576

Reviewer response for version 1

Mario Bianchetti 1

The case report entitled “Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (Seidlmayer purpura) – a dramatic presentation for a benign disease” is interesting and rather well-presented. The following 12 changes might ameliorate the attractiveness of the report:

  1. The term “Seidlmayer purpura” is popular in Germany (and perhaps in Italy). Most authors use the term “Finkelstein-Seidlmayer purpura” (Finkelstein reported his case in 1929, Seidlmayer in 1939). Please modify the manuscript accordingly.

  2. Present manuscript: “…is a rare cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis.”

    My suggestion: “…is a rare small vessel cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis affecting infants 4 weeks to 24 months of age.”

  3. Statement: “Initially it has been interpreted as a Henoch-Schönlein purpura variant, but now it is considered a distinct disease.” Remove this statement from the Introduction section (this issue is addressed in the Discussion section).

  4. Statement: “An 11-month-old girl from France presented with fever and oval purpuric lesions on the face and extremities, which had appeared one hour before.” Please provide temperature value or at least “moderate” respectively “high” fever (furthermore: state either “axillary” or “rectal”).

  5. Skin lesions are sometimes painful in Finkelstein-Seidlmayer disease. I wonder if lesions were painful in this case (important information).

  6. Was pruritus present (it is usually absent in this vasculitis)?

  7. Statement: “Many organisms including adenovirus, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, rotavirus, herpes simplex virus, tuberculosis, streptococci, and staphylococci are associated with AHEI.”

    My suggestion: remove “tuberculosis” (because tuberculosis has never been associated with this vasculitis after 1969).

  8. Statement: “Vaccinations or medications could also trigger AHEI”. However, no cases of AHEI have been causally associated, to the best of my knowledge, with the medications.

    My suggestion: modify the statement accordingly.

  9. Statement: “In the majority of cases there is no visceral involvement and the disease is benign and self-limited.”

    My suggestion: “In the vast majority of cases there is no visceral involvement and the disease is benign and self-limited.

  10. The statement “Treatment of AHEI remains controversial; conservative management is the most frequently approach, because this disease is a self-limited condition” is poorly presented.

    My suggestion: AHEI is a self-limited condition. The lesions disappear within 3 weeks in ≥80% of the cases. Systemic steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antihistamines are prescribed in many cases. It is currently assumed, however, that these drugs do not alter the disease course. Once the diagnosis is established, supportive care and reassurance are advised.

  11. The total length of the current report is excessive (please reduce the total length by ≥10%).

  12. References:

    - Please remove references number 6 (Miorin) and number 10 (Tagliabue) because they were not published in English language (local journals).

    - Please add the following new reference: Lava et al. (2017 1) (recent review, more up-to-date than current reference number 2.)

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

References

  • 1. : Cutaneous Manifestations of Small-Vessel Leukocytoclastic Vasculitides in Childhood. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology.2017;53(3) : 10.1007/s12016-017-8626-3 439-451 10.1007/s12016-017-8626-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES