Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019 Nov 26;188:172829. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.172829

Therapeutic efficacy of environmental enrichment for substance use disorders

Ewa Galaj 1, Eddy D Barrera 2, Robert Ranaldi 2,*
PMCID: PMC6944776  NIHMSID: NIHMS1545896  PMID: 31778722

Abstract

Addiction to drug and alcohol is regarded as a major health problem worldwide for which available treatments show limited effectiveness. The biggest challenge remains to enhance the capacities of interventions to reduce craving, prevent relapse and promote long-term recovery. New strategies to meet these challenges are being explored. Findings from preclinical work suggest that environmental enrichment (EE) holds therapeutic potential for the treatment of substance use disorders, as demonstrated in a number of animal models of drug abuse. The EE intervention introduced after drug exposure leads to attenuation of compulsive drug taking, attenuation of the rewarding (and reinforcing) effects of drugs, reductions in control of behavior by drug cues, and, very importantly, relapse prevention. Clinical work also suggests that multidimensional EE interventions (involving physical activity, social interaction, vocational training, recreational and community involvement) might produce similar therapeutic effects, if implemented continuously and rigorously. In this review we survey preclinical and clinical studies assessing the efficacy of EE as a behavioral intervention for substance use disorders and address related challenges. We also review work providing empirical evidence for EE-induced neuroplasticity within the mesocorticolimbic system that is believed to contribute to the seemingly therapeutic effects of EE on drug and alcohol-related behaviors.

1. Introduction

Drug addiction is a growing problem in the Unites States that affects public health as well as social and economic welfare. It is estimated that addiction-related costs to society exceed $740 billion annually due to crime, loss of productivity and healthcare (NIDA 2016). In 2017 more than 70,000 Americans died from drug overdose, mainly from opioid or opioid-based prescription drugs. The recent increases in drug overdose deaths have been so steep (Rudd et al. 2016; Colon-Berezin et al. 2019; Jannetto et al. 2019) that they contributed to reductions in the country’s life expectancy over the last three years, a pattern not seen since World War II, and to the declaration of the national opioid crisis. Despite the enormous toll that drug addiction continues to take on our society, there still is no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for the treatment of psychostimulant use disorders and those medications that are available for opioid use disorder (e.g., methadone and buprenorphine) show limited effectiveness in relapse prevention (Kleber 2007; Stotts et al. 2009; Nielsen et al. 2016; Dermody et al. 2018). It is estimated that only 5.3 to 15.3 % of individuals maintain abstinence from alcohol or drugs for more than one year after termination of pharmacotherapy, representing staggering rates of relapse (White 2012; McCabe et al. 2018).

Although pharmacotherapies are often the first line of defense against substance use disorders, behavioral interventions have also been implemented. Those that have been used are often ineffective (e.g., cue-exposure therapy) in preventing relapse (Franken et al. 1999; Marissen et al. 2007) or their effectiveness is short lasting (e.g., contingency management therapy; community reinforcement approach) (Stitzer et al. 1980; Silverman et al. 1996; Roozen et al. 2004; Petry et al. 2005). The lack of effective treatments for the prevention of relapse continues to require considerable efforts and resources to be dedicated to the development of better therapies that will attenuate high relapse rates and help individuals struggling with substance use disorders maintain long-term recovery. A possible problem with these behavioral strategies is that they are focused on specific contingency conditions and appear to work only as long as these conditions are in effect. The result is that when these conditions are stopped (at the end of treatment) the drug taking response typically resumes (relapse) (Troisi 2013; Peck and Ranaldi 2014). As such, in recent years we have investigated alternative behavioral strategies that avoid these pitfalls. One solution might be the use of environmental enrichment (EE), a behavioral strategy that is not dependent on new learning that is effective only under specific (e.g., clinical) contexts and conditions. As a treatment for substance use disorder EE may be useful because (1) it may reduce drug seeking by reducing the reinforcing consequences of the seeking behavior through a behavioral contrast mechanism (Grimm et al. 2008; Ranaldi et al. 2011; Peck and Ranaldi 2014), (2) it modifies neural circuits in regions implicated in compulsive drug seeking (Spires et al. 2004) and drug context learning (Pinaud et al. 2001) and (3) it can reduce stress (Thiel et al. 2012), a known powerful inducer of relapse. EE is a behavioral intervention that has been successfully applied to preclinical and clinical populations producing remarkable changes in neuronal and behavioral functions. The following review summarizes preclinical and clinical studies that examined the efficacy of EE as a behavioral treatment for drug-related behaviors. Emphasis is placed on the efficacy of EE in the prevention of relapse and drug seeking. We will also discuss the neuronal effects of EE that might serve as possible neural explanations of changes in drug-related behaviors.

2. Early observations of environmental enrichment effects

EE can consist of making available to animals one or more of the following: sensory stimulation, physical activity and social interaction. Although there is no standard implementation of EE, in most instances, animals are provided with bigger housing cages and novel objects (i.e., “toys”). For some, access to physical activity on a treadmill or a running wheel is a key feature of EE, although not the only one. Some laboratories incorporate social interaction as part of enrichment; however social housing in drug self-administration studies, a focus of this review, can be technically problematic and not often used. What researchers agree on is that EE provides animals with more sensory stimulation and or physical activity in a behaviorally non-contingent manner (i.e., not dependent on the emission of a specific behavior) than what they would receive under standard conditions.

The first evidence of environmental effects on behavior derives from work of Donald O. Hebb, the Canadian neuropsychologist (Hebb 1947), who raised laboratory rats in his home. Hebb noted that his pet rats performed better on a maze than rats reared in standard laboratory conditions (Hebb 1947). In a follow-up study, Hebb demonstrated that pet dogs reared in EE also performed better on problem-solving tasks than dogs reared in simple cages with no view of their surroundings and little contact with humans (Clarke et al. 1951). Although these observations gave us a suggestion of how early experiences influence behavior, more systematic experimental research was initiated by Mark Rosenzweig in the late 1950’s. Rosenzweig and his colleagues demonstrated that rats reared in groups in super-sized cages filled with toys, ladders, tunnels and running wheels had greater cortical acetylcholinesterase activity and larger cerebral cortices than rats reared in isolation and standard cages (Krech et al. 1960; Bennett et al. 1964). Until Rosenzweig’s work the adult brain was generally thought to be fixed and unable to undergo any degree of neuroplasticity. Since then, a number of studies have shown that the multimodal stimulation from EE promotes neuronal plasticity that includes alterations in the morphology of neurons (Holloway 1966; Greenough et al. 1973; Rosenzweig and Bennett 1996; Kolb et al. 2003a) and glial cells (Viola et al. 2009; Diniz et al. 2010), long term synaptic potentiation and depression (Artola et al. 2006; Hosseiny et al. 2014) and alterations in gene transcription (Greenwood et al. 2011) and neurogenesis (Kempermann et al. 1997; van Praag et al. 2005; Hosseiny et al. 2014). Exposure to EE also modifies the neurochemical parameters of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Falkenberg et al. 1992; Bakos et al. 2009) and cholinergic (Bennett et al. 1964) and glutamatergic systems (Melendez et al. 2004), both important for learning and memory. Because EE promotes various forms of neuronal plasticity, it has been explored as a treatment for a number of medical conditions, leading to findings that it produces neuroprotective effects in neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s (Jadavji et al. 2006) or Alzheimer disease (Arendash et al. 2004; Prado Lima et al. 2018) and can effectively promote recovery from stroke (Kolb and Gibb 1991) or traumatic brain injuries (Will et al. 2004; Fischer and Peduzzi 2007).

3. The therapeutic potential of environmental enrichment for drug abuse and addiction

Given its effects on neurochemistry and behavior, EE has also been studied in relation to drug abuse. Earlier studies mostly focused on the ability of EE implemented during rearing (before any drug exposure) to subsequently reduce drug effects (Bardo et al. 1995; Bezard et al. 2003; Solinas et al. 2009). The main objective of these studies was to evaluate preventative applications of EE to reduce vulnerability to drug abuse [for reviews see (Stairs and Bardo 2009; Solinas et al. 2010)]. Soon it became conceivable to investigate the therapeutic potential of EE by introducing it not during rearing but after exposure to drugs and the development of drug-taking habits (Thiel et al. 2010; Ranaldi et al. 2011). A number of studies investigated whether exposure to EE after the development of drug-related behaviors (e.g., intravenous drug self-administration) would diminish subsequent drug self-administration, motivation to seek drug and the propensity to relapse. We will now highlight major findings from this preclinical work.

3.1. Intravenous drug-self administration

The intravenous drug self-administration paradigm has been used extensively in basic drug addiction research to model the human drug use condition. In this paradigm animals can voluntarily determine if and how much drug they self-administer intravenously. Studies that implemented EE during rearing suggested protective effects of EE against the future acquisition of reliable self-administration of psychostimulants (Bardo et al. 2001; Green et al. 2002, 2010; Puhl et al. 2012), opiates (Hofford et al. 2017) as well as against the escalation of drug intake (believed to mimic “out of control” intake in humans with substance use disorder) in rats (Gipson et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2011). Likewise, EE in the form of physical exercise introduced before drug exposure can decrease the propensity for drug self-administration, again suggesting that it can reduce vulnerability to drug abuse (Smith et al. 2011; Smith and Pitts 2012; Lynch et al. 2017). However, these reports are in sharp contrast to other findings that housing conditions during rearing do not influence propensities to self-administer amphetamine (Schenk et al. 1988; Green et al. 2002), methamphetamine- (Lu et al. 2012; Hofford et al. 2014), heroin (Imperio et al. 2018) or cocaine- (Bozarth et al. 1989; Westenbroek et al. 2013).

Interestingly, when EE (running wheel) is introduced concurrently with the option to self-administer drug, it produces remarkable changes in drug-related behaviors. Six-hours of concurrently available wheel running can suppress cocaine self-administration in rats, with greater suppressant effects in females than males (Cosgrove et al. 2002) and in adolescents than adults (Zlebnik et al. 2012). However, Miller and colleagues showed that in rats well-trained to self-administer methamphetamine, one hour of concurrently available wheel running was not sufficient to reduce methamphetamine intake (Miller et al. 2012). In contrast, brief physical activity, following the establishment of drug self-administration, can be sufficient to alter drug taking. Such brief intervention is especially interesting from a clinical perspective, as poor compliance is common among patients in long and time-consuming interventions. It’s been reported that rats with a history of intravenous self-administration of methamphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or methylone and given 22-h of home cage access to a running wheel showed a reduction in their drug intake in subsequent self-administration sessions (Aarde et al. 2015). Likewise, three brief 4 h EE interventions introduced both immediately after and 24 h after each extinction session to rats previously self-administering cocaine have been shown to effectively reduce the re-acquisition of cocaine self-administration in subsequent sessions (Gauthier et al. 2015). Interestingly, when rats received 4 h of EE either 24 h before an extinction session or immediately after each extinction session, EE had no effect on the re-acquisition of cocaine self-administration under a second order schedule of reinforcement (Gauthier et al. 2015). To our knowledge, the effects of longer periods of exposure to EE or different forms of EE treatment on drug self-administration have not been reported. Overall, these reports indicate that EE, especially physical exercise, when introduced concurrently or after drug exposure, has therapeutic potential for drug abuse and use disorder.

3.2. Conditioned place preference

The conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm is commonly used to study the rewarding effects of drugs and drug-related stimuli (i.e., conditioned stimuli). After repeated drug-place pairing (conditioning), animals spend more time in the place associated with the drug, suggesting the drug-paired compartment, through learning processes, produces rewarding effects (Mucha et al. 1982; Tzschentke 1998, 2007; Bardo and Bevins 2000). It appears that EE produces differential effects on drug-induced CPP. There is some evidence that EE has preventative potential against drug effects. Rearing with EE has been shown to attenuate the development of opiate (Xu et al. 2007; El Rawas et al. 2009) and cocaine CPP in rodents (Solinas et al. 2009; Zakharova et al. 2009; Nader et al. 2012). However, the Ranaldi lab found that EE in rearing did not prevent the development of cocaine CPP across a range of cocaine doses (Galaj et al 2017). Similar findings were observed by others when the conditioning drugs were psychostimulants (Schenk et al. 1986; Thiriet et al. 2008; Hofford et al. 2014; Galaj et al. 2017) or opiates (Smith et al. 2005). Also, other studies found that EE (including access to a running wheel), when introduced before conditioning, actually strengthened nicotine (Ewin et al. 2015), morphine (Eisenstein and Holmes 2007) or cocaine CPP (Smith et al. 2008) and delayed the extinction of CPP (Mustroph et al. 2011). A very recent study found no evidence of wheel running during rearing on the development of cocaine CPP in mice (Lespine and Tirelli 2019). Thus, the power of EE as a preventative intervention against the development of CPP remains inconclusive and warrants further studies.

On the other hand, the literature provides compelling evidence that EE introduced after conditioning is a powerful behavioral intervention capable of diminishing the expression of drug-induced CPP in rodents (Solinas et al. 2008; Chauvet et al. 2011; Galaj et al. 2017). Thirty days, but not 7, of EE treatment is sufficient to completely abolish cocaine CPP in mice (Solinas et al. 2008). We recently reported that Long Evans rats when exposed to 30 days of enrichment after cocaine or heroin exposure did not show a CPP as compared to non-EE rats (Galaj et al. 2016, 2017). Other forms of enrichment have also been successful at diminishing CPP. For example, mice with one or four weeks of access to running wheels immediately after cocaine conditioning showed reduced CPP as compared to sedentary controls (Mustroph et al. 2016). In addition, treadmill running has been reported to reduce nicotine CPP in mice when introduced after conditioning (Zhou et al. 2018).

Additional evidence for the potential therapeutic effects of EE comes from studies implementing social interaction either concurrently or immediately after drug exposure. When allowed to explore a compartment previously paired with a psychostimulant and one paired with another sex- and age-matched conspecific, rats and mice prefer the compartment paired with another conspecific rodent, suggesting that social interaction can effectively compete with cocaine reward and serve as a therapeutic deterrent against cocaine-related behaviors (Fritz et al. 2011; Yates et al. 2013; Kummer et al. 2014). Interestingly, mice and rats can develop cocaine CPP after a single cocaine exposure but do not re-express their preference for a cocaine-paired compartment when given four brief episodes of social interaction in the compartment previously paired with cocaine (Fritz et al. 2011; Bregolin et al. 2017). Thus, just four 15 min episodes of social interaction can be sufficient to reduce a preference for drug-paired stimuli over social interaction and to inhibit the subsequent re-expression of psychostimulant CPP [for a review see (Zernig et al. 2013)].

3.3. Animal abstinence models

The conflict-based abstinence paradigm is an appropriate animal model that mimics the human experience of abstinence. Drug users, who nearly always have access to their drug of choice and are motivated to abstain in order to avoid the negative consequences (i.e., medical, social, financial and legal stressors) of continued drug use, often face the conflict situation of choosing to continue drug use or abstaining. In the “animal conflict model” (Cooper et al. 2007), animals can self-administer the drug but doing so necessitates enduring stressful consequences (i.e., crossing a grid floor that is electrified by a current). Typically, the electric current is increased after each day of continued drug taking until the animal ceases lever pressing for a defined number of IVSA sessions and reaches abstinence. The Ranaldi group found that EE facilitates abstinence from cocaine or heroin self-administration in the conflict model. Rats that completed cocaine or heroin self-administration training were transferred to EE (sensory stimulation with novel objects and running wheels) or non-EE cages and allowed to continue to self-administer the drug in daily 30-min sessions during which the floor area near the levers was electrified. EE rats achieved abstinence (defined as zero lever presses for 3 consecutive sessions) in fewer numbers of sessions and at lower electric barrier currents than non-EE rats (Peck et al. 2015; Ewing and Ranaldi 2018). These results support the idea that EE introduced after the acquisition of a drug self-administration behavior might be an effective behavioral intervention that facilitates abstinence from cocaine and heroin use.

In basic drug addiction research, extinction of drug seeking or preference for drug-related stimuli has been extensively used to study abstinence. The extinction paradigm involves the reduction of drug-related responding upon the removal of reinforcers (drug) or conditioned stimuli (e.g., light/tone) associated with the drug. However, it is important to note that extinction is different from abstinence because under extinction conditions, animals cannot self-administer the drug as it is not available nor does the animal face negative consequences of continued drug use. Nevertheless, there is evidence that EE can facilitate extinction of drug seeking. In rats that acquired self-administration of cocaine, 30 days of EE significantly reduced lever pressing during daily extinction sessions (Thiel et al. 2009, 2010; Chauvet et al. 2009; Ranaldi et al. 2011; Zlebnik and Carroll 2015). EE intervention introduced during forced abstinence (where animals are not exposed to drug self-administration chambers) is also effective at reducing nicotine and methamphetamine seeking (Sanchez et al. 2013; Sobieraj et al. 2016; Sikora et al. 2018). However, the Ranaldi group reported that 30 days of EE introduced after heroin self-administration had no effects on extinction of heroin seeking (Galaj et al. 2016). Perhaps longer exposure to or more intense EE is needed to facilitate extinction of heroin seeking. Clearly more studies are needed to address this issue.

Interestingly, when rats who previously self-administered cocaine received 4 h of EE both 24 h before and immediately after each extinction session, EE rats showed a significant reduction in cocaine seeking as compared to non-EE rats (Gauthier et al. 2015), suggesting that even brief EE interventions can be effective at reducing cocaine seeking. Similarly, daily 2-h wheel running episodes introduced during the extinction phase can reduce cocaine (Lynch et al. 2010; Peterson et al. 2014b) or nicotine seeking (Lynch et al. 2019). Notably, the most robust effects of EE (especially of wheel running) on drug seeking occur when EE is introduced during early extinction sessions and these effects can persist even when access to the running wheel is terminated. In contrast, wheel running introduced during late stages of extinction is not as effective at reducing cocaine seeking (Beiter et al. 2016; Abel et al. 2019). In support of the idea that EE has therapeutic value to combat drug-related effects are findings that EE introduced after conditioning can facilitate the extinction of CPP induced by cocaine [(Mustroph et al. 2011) but see (Solinas et al. 2008; Robison et al. 2018a)], methamphetamine (Huang et al. 2016) but not alcohol (Li et al. 2015a). Overall, these studies suggest that EE as a behavioral intervention may decrease incentive motivation to seek drug and perhaps limit the experience of craving that often precedes relapse.

3.4. Reinstatement (animal relapse) models

A hallmark of addiction is recurring relapse, which is thought to be driven by both incentive motivation for drug and avoidance of negative affective states (Wise and Koob 2014). The repeating cycle of abstinence and relapse has been primarily studied using the reinstatement model (Carroll and Comer 1996; Shaham and Miczek 2003) in which extinguished responding for a drug is reinstated by acute exposure to drug cues, stress or drug. A growing body of literature provides supporting evidence for a therapeutic potential of EE to reduce relapse. In rats with a history of cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin or nicotine self-administration EE intervention can diminish cue-induced reinstatement of drug seeking (Thiel et al. 2009, 2010; Chauvet et al. 2009; Thanos et al. 2013; Sobieraj et al. 2016; Galaj et al. 2016). Using a within-session extinction/reinstatement procedure, Lynch’s group demonstrated that daily 2 h access to a running wheel during 10–15 days of forced abstinence from nicotine self-administration was sufficient to reduce nicotine seeking during the extinction phase but not cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine seeking in rats (Sanchez et al. 2013, 2014). As mentioned above, the therapeutic effectiveness of EE (e.g., wheel running) depends on the duration of intervention, with extended EE exposure producing more robust effects (Peterson et al. 2014a, b).

Another powerful trigger of relapse is re-exposure to drug itself. There are reports that EE (including a running wheel) either fails to reduce (Thiel et al. 2009; Chauvet et al. 2009) or, in some cases, can enhance reinstatement of responding after cocaine priming in adult rats (Thanos et al. 2013). However, when EE exposure is increased to 60 days during forced abstinence with additional days of extinction, EE can reduce cue-induced and cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug seeking in adolescent, but not adult, rats (Li and Frantz 2017). Key findings of this study are noteworthy. First, the therapeutic benefits of EE are correlated with the duration of EE exposure suggesting that prolonged behavioral interventions might be necessary to prevent drug-primed relapse. Second, adolescent rats are more responsive to the seemingly therapeutic effects of EE than adult rats, suggesting that EE’s therapeutic benefits might be partially attributable to propensity for neuroplasticity (presumably greater in adolescents than in adults; see the discussion below).

In addition, EE as a behavioral intervention has been shown to effectively reduce stress-induced reinstatement of drug seeking in rats [(Chauvet et al. 2009; Zlebnik et al. 2010) but see (Ogbonmwan et al. 2015)]. In female Sprague Dawley rats with already-established cocaine CPP, six weeks of 1-h daily treadmill running can reduce stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine CPP (Robison et al. 2018a). EE, when introduced after the development of CPP, can also prevent drug-induced reinstatement of cocaine (Solinas et al. 2008), or alcohol CPP (Li et al. 2015a). These findings suggest that EE may reduce the propensity to relapse, adding to a growing body of evidence supporting the therapeutic use of EE to combat substance use disorders.

Relapse to drug use in humans can occur even after prolonged abstinence (Hunt et al. 1971) and is often preceded by drug craving (O’Brien et al. 1992). This phenomenon was also identified in laboratory animals based on the observation that rats with a history of cocaine (Shalev et al. 2001; Grimm et al. 2001; Freeman et al. 2008), heroin, nicotine (Abdolahi et al. 2010), methamphetamine (Shepard et al. 2004), or alcohol (Bienkowski et al. 2004) self-administration show increases in responding in the absence of the drug (aka drug seeking) over time. In this “incubation of drug craving” model, animals, after acquiring the drug self-administration behavior, are not given the opportunity to seek the drug during “forced abstinence” and later are exposed to drug cues or drug priming to elicit drug seeking. It has been reported that 30-day access to a running wheel or 60-day EE exposure (group housing with wheel and toys) during forced abstinence diminishes time-dependent increases in cocaine seeking (incubation of craving) (Chauvet et al. 2012; Zlebnik and Carroll 2015). However, when EE was discontinued, its seemingly therapeutic effects on incubation of drug craving disappeared (Chauvet et al. 2012), suggesting that prolonged, rather than brief, exposure to EE might be a more effective approach in the prevention of relapse

4. Applicability of EE to the human population struggling with substance use disorder

Undoubtedly, the therapeutic potential of EE for the treatment of substance use disorder has been demonstrated in a number of preclinical models of addiction. However, major concerns and challenges arise in regards to translating the therapeutic benefits of EE to a clinical population struggling with substance use disorders. Some of these concerns derive from the misconception that EE in humans equates to a luxurious lifestyle filled with expensive adventures and commodities. This approach, for obvious reasons, lacks practicality and feasibility within clinical settings. But what clinical EE intervention might consist of is making available to individuals with SUDs non-contingent multidimensional enrichment that might be (and often is in sufferers of SUDs) normally lacking in their everyday lives. Furthermore, a therapeutic strategy might include the identification of feasible rewarding stimuli/activities for an individual and designing schedules that regularly include these enrichments in that individual’s routine. A growing body of literature has shown that intervention strategies involving enhanced cognitive stimulation, social interaction, and physical activity (aka EE) are highly effective in the treatment of neurological and psychological disorders (Pang et al. 2013; Morres et al. 2019; Cugusi et al. 2019), including addiction (Eddie et al. 2019). The most consistent and noteworthy are the findings that exercise as a form of enrichment can impede drug-related behaviors.

In nicotine smokers, physical exercise reduces acute cravings (Williams et al. 2011; Elibero et al. 2011; Prapavessis et al. 2014; Kurti and Dallery 2014; Fong et al. 2014) and leads to temporary cessation of smoking (Prapavessis et al. 2016) and withdrawal symptoms (Taylor et al. 2007; Janse Van Rensburg et al. 2009; Kurti and Dallery 2014). While exercise exerts acute effects on smoking cessation, these effects are often short-lasting and most smokers relapse within a year (Prapavessis et al. 2016; Patten et al. 2017). Thus, it has been suggested that physical exercise can be an effective behavioral intervention for nicotine use disorder, if engaged in frequently and consistently over time.

Nicotine use disorder is not the only SUD for which physical exercise can derive therapeutic benefits. Light, but not heavy, methamphetamine users who underwent an eight-week exercise program reported using less methamphetamine and had a lower percentage of drug positive urine, as measured 1, 3 and 6 months post-intervention, (Rawson et al. 2015). Another study reported that acute exercise eliminated craving for methamphetamine during, immediately following, and 50 min post-intervention (Wang et al. 2015). Though not statistically significant, exercise also decreased cocaine, but not nicotine, use in the last 24 h in individuals with concurrent cocaine and nicotine use disorders (De La Garza et al. 2016). Physical exercise has also shown promise for alcohol use disorder as heavy drinkers during prolonged (6–12 month) (Jensen et al. 2019) or 8-week supervised exercise program reduced their alcohol consumption (Georgakouli et al. 2017). It is worth noting that these types of interventions likely produce additional physiological and psychological benefits, including improved cardiovascular function and mood, the latter being critical in the treatment of SUDs. It has been well documented that the high prevalence of depression and suicidality among individuals struggling with SUDs, contributes to relapse and continuation of drug use (Bradizza et al. 2006; Milby et al. 2015; Volkow et al. 2019). Thus, one may argue that by alleviating depression, exercise can improve the individual’s quality of life and provide incentive motivation to dramatically change their life.

Exercise can reduce stress, anxiety and depression, all states associated with heroin withdrawal, suggesting it might help maintain abstinence by heroin-addicted individuals. In the area of sensory stimulation Bennett et al. (1998) indicated that one weekend camping trip – adventure therapy – resulted in reduced relapse in alcohol users compared to a similar control group without the camping trip. Also, Cutter et al. (2014) found that video-game playing decreased substance use, suggesting that engaging in non-concurrent and non-contingent video game playing might be useful as a drug addiction treatment. Similarly, body motion-engaged video games can contribute to a decline in craving in young individuals struggling with opioid-related problems as well as in longer participation in this outpatient treatment program (Abroms et al. 2015). There is evidence that engagement in interactive videogames stimulates the mesocorticolimbic system (Cole et al. 2012), improves optimism, reduces stress and depression (key triggers of relapse) and promotes sustained exercise that provides additional health benefits (Cutter et al. 2014; Fish et al. 2014; Bock et al. 2019). It is also important to note that in these studies participants did not choose between drug and enrichment but simply engaged in the enrichment activities and experienced a benefit from doing so. This is similar to our rat model that does not make available a choice between drug and enrichment. These EE procedures (in humans and in rats) do not involve, nor do they need to involve, contingency management or choice principles for them to be effective.

4.1. Other forms of enrichment

Employment has been viewed as an essential part of recovery that significantly improves the recovering individual’s quality of life. However, recovering addicted individuals often face challenges in returning to the job market and in maintaining their employment. Some of them are uncertain about their work abilities and vocational choices while others experience anxiety associated with finding, applying for and being accepted for employment. Vocational training can provide intellectual stimulation, incentive motivation for change and opportunities to develop skills necessary for employment. Vocational training can also contribute to a reduction in drug and alcohol use (Hammer et al. 1985; Gómez et al. 2014). Those who complete vocational training tend to have better employment and recovery outcomes (Hammer et al. 1985; Platt 1995). However, too often, vocational training requires abstinence contingency. Koffarnus and colleagues found that alcoholics who had received paid vocational training (contingent upon abstinence) consumed less alcohol and had fewer alcohol positive breathe samples during monthly assessments than individuals who received either unpaid or abstinence contingent vocational training (Koffarnus et al. 2011). Likewise, homeless substance users receiving an enhanced day treatment program with vocational training and housing contingently upon drug-free urine samples showed a greater abstinence rate than individuals receiving weekly individual and group counseling (Milby et al. 1996, 2000). Although contingency management therapy, like the one described here, produces positive short-term outcomes, its efficacy diminishes over time (Silverman et al. 1996; Higgins et al. 2000; Rawson et al. 2002; Koffarnus et al. 2011; Barnett et al. 2017). Because of a lack of clinical studies with prolonged follow-up assessments it remains unknown whether abstinence-non-contingent stimulation (aka EE intervention) can produce better long-term outcomes. However, some studies report promising trends emerging with longer EE exposure. Higher abstinence rates are observed with 4 week non-contingent interventions as compared to one-week interventions (Barnett et al. 2017). Given the highly promising results obtained with EE interventions in a pre-clinical setting, it is reasonable to suggest that prolonged multidimensional EE interventions (involving physical activity, social interaction, vocational training, recreational and community involvement) might produce therapeutic effects for individuals with SUDs. Clearly, this issue warrants thoughtful consideration and future study.

4.2. Social support networks as a form of EE

A corollary component of EE intervention for SUDs is the strengthening of social support networks around drug-addicted individuals. Non-drug using family members, friends, colleagues, 12-Step program groups, or program sponsors can play a critical role in the recovery process. Social networks that support recovery lead to longer participation in treatment programs, positive outcomes and prolonged abstinence from drugs and alcohol (Havassy et al. 1991; Bassuk et al. 2016; Lookatch et al. 2019). Thus, support from others in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) programs is a significant predictor of lower alcohol consumption and contributor to abstinence 1 or 3 years after the treatment (Kaskutas et al. 2002; Bond et al. 2003). Other recovering addicted individuals often have greater impact on recovery than non-AA members as they are thought to be able to relate to problems the individual is facing and teach the skills necessary to overcome cravings (Kaskutas et al. 2002; Bond et al. 2003). The reports concerning social support for recovery suggest that choosing social support networks carefully is imperative to successful recovery as just any type of friend will not suffice, and in some cases, the “wrong friends” may negatively impact treatment outcome.

The relationship that most recovering addicts describe as helpful for initiating abstinence is peer support (Lookatch et al. 2019). One 12-month follow-up study revealed that brief interaction with a physician followed by a visit with a recovering alcoholic (peer intervention) is sufficient to motivate patients with alcohol problems to seek professional help and to work towards improvement of their life (Blondell et al. 2001). There is some evidence that a recovering addicted individual benefits most from peer support when the peer is highly involved in their recovery (e.g., by arranging meetings between the patient and local AA or Narcotics Anonymous groups, attending meetings together, etc.) (Timko et al. 2006; Timko and DeBenedetti 2007).

More recently, O’Connell and colleagues demonstrated that individuals with alcohol and mental health problems who received skills training in a peer-led social engagement program that included social interaction in inpatient and outpatient settings, twice-weekly mutual meetings, and recreational outings, showed reductions in alcohol use at 3- and 9-month follow-ups (O’Connell et al. 2017). Though brief social interactions are effective for AUD, they may not be sufficient for cocaine or heroin use disorder (Bernstein et al. 2005; Day et al. 2018). Continuous social interaction that includes peer-run groups, coaching, workshops, seminars, social and recreational activities and community events might be more appropriate.

5. EE causes brain plasticity

The growing literature demonstrating the therapeutic benefits of EE as a behavioral intervention for SUDs has lead to an expansion of our current knowledge of the neural mechanisms by which EE exerts these effects. By providing sensorimotor stimulation, social interaction and physical activity, EE is thought to mold the whole brain, inducing experience-based neuroplasticity in brain regions critical for reward, habits, emotional regulation, decision-making and impulse control. These findings are quite pertinent because the same brain regions involved in these psychological phenomena have been implicated in a number of drug-related behaviors and are believed to be “hijacked” by repeated drug use (Koob and Le Moal 1997; Robinson and Kolb 2004; Kalivas et al. 2005).

There is evidence that novel environmental stimuli (typical components of EE) can activate the mesolimbic system (Bardo et al. 1990; Bunzeck and Düzel 2006) which includes the dopamine (DA) cells originating in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). By triggering the release of DA into the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Feenstra and Botterblom 1996; Beaufour et al. 2001) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) (Jones et al. 1996; Rebec et al. 1997b, a; Legault and Wise 1999), novel stimuli promote exploratory behavior, increase reward processing, regulate motivation and enhance learning. In support of this premise are the findings that lesions in PFC (Burns et al. 1996) or blockade of DA neurotransmission in NAc (Hooks and Kalivas 1995) impedes novelty exploration in rats. The phasic elevation of DA neurotransmission by novel environmental stimuli depends on glutamatergic transmission in the VTA (Legault and Wise 1999) and activation of the PFC, a brain region critical for the detection of novelty (Burns et al. 1996; Rebec et al. 1997b) and for responding to unexpected stimuli (Knight and Grabowecky 1995). In addition, other mesolimbic regions such as the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and ventral hippocampus have been implicated in novelty-related and investigatory behaviors (Wu and Brudzynski 1995; Burns et al. 1996; Wittmann et al. 2007) and are known to undergo neuroadaptation after EE exposure.

Social interaction (play behavior), another important component of EE, is rewarding in its own right (Calcagnetti and Schechter 1992) presumably because it is associated with DA neurotransmission (Corbett et al. 1993; Kagaya et al. 1996; Willuhn et al. 2014) and activation of limbic regions (Fritz et al. 2011; Dölen et al. 2013; Felix-Ortiz and Tye 2014). Preclinical studies have shown that social interaction can reduce the expression of p 38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the NAc, which plays a role in stress and anxiety and is typically elevated after drug exposure (Salti et al. 2015), can enhance cortical synaptic function, dendritic spine density and the complexity of neuronal networks (Himmler et al. 2013; Burleson et al. 2016; Liang et al. 2019). Other neuroplastic changes within the mesocorticolimbic system include presynaptic alterations in DA, glutamate, opioid or serotonin neurotransmission and often postsynaptic alterations in receptor expression and binding (Vanderschuren et al. 1995; Hall et al. 1998; Wood et al. 2005; Han et al. 2012; Araki et al. 2014;). These enduring changes are in stark contrast to neuroplastic changes caused by social isolation. Social isolation-dependent brain pathology in PFC, NAc and BLA include: hyperexcitability of NAc neurons (Zhang et al. 2019), augmented DA and glutamate neurotransmission in response to rewarding and aversive stimuli (Hall et al. 1998; Karkhanis et al. 2015, 2019), enhanced expression of AMPA, NMDA, DA D2 receptors (Wood et al. 2005; Turnock-Jones et al. 2009; Han et al. 2012; Araki et al. 2014) and morphological changes within these regions (Wang et al. 2012). These neuroplastic changes are associated with propensity for drug abuse and can be prevented or reversed by EE exposure.

Likewise, physical activity is a strong natural reward (Belke and Wagner 2005; Brené et al. 2007) and is often incorporated into EE regimens. Physical activity can activate DA neurons and is associated with neuroplasticity within the mesolimbic system. Cfos transcription is a measure of cellular activity and often used to quantify drug-induced activation of reward-processing neurons. It’s been reported that rats with a prior history of wheel running have lower cocaine-induced cfos expression in the NAc, dorsal striatum and PFC compared to sedentary rats, suggesting that wheel running, in addition to reducing cocaine-related behaviors, also reduces reward neuron responsivity to drugs of abuse (Zlebnik et al. 2014). Repeated wheel running is associated with greater levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA in the VTA, delta opioid receptor (DOR) mRNA levels in the NAc shell, and reduced levels of DA D2 mRNA in the NAc core (Greenwood et al. 2011). Autoradiography studies have shown that exercise reduces DA D1 receptor-like binding within the olfactory tubercle and NAc shell (ventral striatum) but increases DA D2 receptor-like binding in dorsal and ventral striatum (Robison et al. 2018b). It is tempting to speculate that these neuronal changes might be partially responsible for the seemingly therapeutic effects of exercise on drug taking and seeking. Consistent with these findings are reports that reductions in DA-related transporters mRNA level (e.g., DA transporter, DAT and vesicular monoamine transporter, VMAT2) occur in rodent PFC and NAc after chronic exercise or multidimensional EE exposure (Bezard et al. 2003; Zhu et al. 2004, 2005, 2013; Zakharova et al. 2009). However, no EE-induced changes in DAT or VMAT2 expression or function were found in the striatum (Zhu et al. 2004; Hofford et al. 2014).

Multidimensional EE treatment produces beneficial changes in drug-related behaviors that are correlated with reductions in the expression of early immune genes, Zif268 in NAc, VTA and amygdala and reduction in fosB expression in the NAc, all brain regions known to play pivotal roles in drug reward and drug seeking (Fritz et al. 2011; El Rawas et al. 2012). We will now review the neuroplastic changes occurring within the mesocorticolimbic regions that might partially explain the therapeutic effects of EE intervention.

5.1. Effects of EE on the prefrontal cortex

Though EE does not lead to persistent alterations in dendritic morphology of PFC neurons (Kolb et al. 2003b), it produces long-lasting alterations in DA, serotonin and glutamate transmission in the PFC (Zhu et al. 2004; Brenes et al. 2008; Darna et al. 2015) and is associated with an increase in the number of parvalbumin (PV) GABA interneurons in this region (Sampedro-Piquero et al. 2016). The extracellular signal-regulated kinase ERK signaling in the PFC that appears to be critically involved in incubation of drug craving (Koya et al. 2009) can be diminished by wheel running, suggesting that this might constitute a contributing factor in the observation of reduced reinstatement of cocaine seeking (Lynch et al. 2010). These data are consistent with reports that EE has attenuating effects on impulsivity (Perry et al. 2008; Kirkpatrick et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2017) and behavioral inflexibility (Sampedro-Piquero et al. 2015; Zeleznikow-Johnston et al. 2017), behaviors believed to be controlled by the PFC and to contribute to compulsive continuation of drug use. A number of studies have shown that chronic exposure to methamphetamine and other drugs of abuse promotes neuroadaptations in the PFC (Tian et al. 2010), a region whose dysfunctionality is associated with compulsive drug taking (Jentsch and Taylor 1999; Goldstein and Volkow 2002). One can argue that EE, by stimulating the PFC, may help individuals increase behavioral flexibility and regain control over their impulsivity.

5.2. Effects of EE on the striatum

Other prime targets of EE-induced neural adaptations are the NAc and dorsal striatum, the brain regions critical for motivation (Ikemoto and Panksepp 1999) and habit formation (Gerdeman et al. 2003; Yin et al. 2004), respectively, and where drug-induced synaptic plasticity appears to play a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of addiction-type behaviors. Implementation of EE offers opportunities to experience sensory stimulation and physical activity that function as rewards in their own right and, through behavioral contrast mechanisms, are thought to diminish the rewarding value of drugs (Ranaldi et al. 2011; Peck and Ranaldi 2014) and reduce motivation to seek drug. These pronounced behavioral changes are often accompanied by EE-induced long-term synaptic plasticity in the NAc and dorsal striatum (caudate and putamen). For example, rats raised in EE not only show persistent changes in drug-related behaviors but also alterations in expression of CREB signaling, ΔFosB, and PKC signaling in the NAc (Green et al. 2002, 2003; Solinas et al. 2008; Lichti et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2014). Mice raised in EE showed reduced behavioral sensitization to cocaine that was associated with reduced cocaine-induced expression of the immediate early gene, zif268, in the NAc as compared to mice raised in standard housing (non-EE) (Solinas et al. 2009). In addition, EE mice also have higher basal levels of ΔFosB, a transcription factor known to be increased by sustained activation of striatal neurons (Thiriet et al. 2008; Solinas et al. 2009). Repeated administration of cocaine increases ΔFosB levels in non-EE mice but decreases it in EE mice (Solinas et al. 2009).

It’s been reported that housing in a complex multidimensional environment for 3.5 months leads to an increase in dendritic arborization in medium spiny neurons in the NAc (Kolb et al. 2003b). In addition, EE alters the expression of a large number of NAc proteins that promote strengthening as well as maturation of excitatory synapses (Lichti et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2016b) and that might contribute to the putative protective and therapeutic effects of EE. Similar types of EE-induced neuroadaptations occur in the dorsal striatum. Mice reared in EE show alterations in the levels of mRNA coding for proteins involved in cell proliferation, cell differentiation, signal transduction, transcription and translation and cell structure and metabolism (Thiriet et al. 2008). In the striatum (as well as in the hippocampus and substantia nigra) EE also increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Bezard et al. 2003), itself implicated in the survival of existing neurons, the growth and differentiation of new neurons, formation of synapses and long-term memory (Acheson et al. 1995; Huang and Reichardt 2001; Bekinschtein et al. 2008). The neuroplastic changes that occur in the NAc and dorsal striatum of mice raised in EE are believed to contribute to the protective mechanisms of EE working against drug effects. However, it is quite reasonable to propose that similar neuroplastic changes might be involved in the therapeutic effects of EE when EE is introduced after drug exposure. Given that the NAc is implicated in reward and incentive motivation, one may imagine that EE, by offering alternative rewards, rewires the local accumbal circuitry so that the value of drugs is relatively diminished and incentive motivation shifts to non-drug rewards. Likewise, EE-induced neuroplasticity in the dorsal striatum, which is considered critical in the formation and maintenance of habitual drug taking (Everitt and Robbins 2005, 2013) may contribute to reductions in drug seeking and propensity to relapse. There is some evidence supporting these hypotheses.

For example, EE promotes the insertion of non-calcium permeable AMPA receptors into silent synapses that typically express stable NMDA receptors without AMPA receptors and that are generated by cocaine exposure (Huang et al. 2009, p. 009). During forced abstinence from cocaine, the calcium permeable AMPA receptors are inserted into cocaine-generated silent excitatory synapses, contributing to their maturation (“un-silencing” the synapse) and incubation of craving (Ma et al. 2014). Dong’s lab has recently demonstrated that EE has the ability to re-silence these silent synapses through insertion of non-calcium permeable AMPA receptors (Ma et al. 2016). These unique synaptic changes induced by EE introduced after cocaine-self-administration are believed to contribute to the seemingly therapeutic effects of EE on the incubation of craving for cocaine (Ma et al. 2016).

5.3. Effects of EE on the amygdala

The amygdala (basolateral and central), which sends glutamatergic efferents to the NAc and PFC, is critically involved in drug craving and seeking (Di and Everitt 2004; Stuber et al. 2011; Stefanik and Kalivas 2013; Li et al. 2015b; Venniro et al. 2018). When given the choice between methamphetamine or social interaction rats decrease self-administration and also do not show incubation of methamphetamine craving after 30 days of forced abstinence (Li et al. 2015b; Venniro et al. 2018). Shaham’s group reported that the protective effect of concurrent reward derived from social interaction was associated with activation of PKC-expressing inhibitory neurons in the central amygdala and with inhibition of the anterior insula (Venniro et al. 2018). It has been proposed that home-cage forced abstinence from methamphetamine leads to recruitment of central amygdala output neurons contributing to long-lasting incubation of craving while volitional social choice remodels this connectivity leading to reduced drug seeking. In addition, given that social-choice induced abstinence is associated with inhibition of the anterior insula, whose glutamatergic neurons project to the central amygdala, it is conceivable that social-choice exposure prevents incubation of craving by inhibiting this anterior insula-central amygdala pathway (Venniro et al. 2018). These findings are consistent with previous reports that mice exposed to EE or social interaction after cocaine conditioning show increases in the expression of the immediate early gene, Early Growth Response protein 1 (EGR1, Zif268) in the basolateral and central amygdala during the re-acquisition or reinstatement of cocaine CPP (Fritz et al. 2011). However, when social interaction is presented as an alternative reward during cocaine CPP, it reverses cocaine CPP-induced expression of the immediate early gene, Zif268 in the BLA (as well as in the NAc and VTA), suggesting that social interaction as a feature of EE may decrease the incentive salience of drug-related stimuli by recruiting BLA neurons (Zernig et al. 2013; Zernig and Pinheiro 2015). It’s been also reported that EE as a therapeutic intervention introduced after cocaine exposure reduced cocaine CPP-induced expression of cFos in BLA and central amygdala as well as in other limbic regions such as the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal striatum, NAc shell, hippocampus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the VTA (Chauvet et al. 2011).

Other EE-induced neuroplastic changes in the BLA have also been reported. For example, in situ hybridization studies have shown that EE increased the cannabinoid CB1 receptor and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) mRNA levels in the BLA and hypothalamus, two brain regions critical for stress responses. Converging evidence suggests that the endocannabinoid system, which modulates the mesolimbic DA system (Xi et al. 2011), plays a critical role in reward and stress processes (Gardner 2005; Solinas et al. 2007; Gorzalka et al. 2008). It has been proposed that EE induced neuroplasticity in the endocannabinoid system, particularly in the BLA and hypothalamus, most likely reduces responses to stress and ultimately deters stress-induced drug seeking (El Rawas et al. 2011).

Converging evidence indicates that the primary cellular mechanism involved in the synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory is the insertion of AMPA receptors in postsynaptic neurons (Malinow and Malenka 2002). Direct phosphorylation of GluR1 by PKA, which is crucial for AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity (Lee et al. 2003; Man et al. 2007), has been shown to be differentially altered by cocaine-self-administration and EE intervention. In rats with a history of cocaine self-administration brief EE interventions, introduced both 24 h before and immediately after extinction sessions, facilitated extinction of cocaine seeking and reduced the re-acquisition of cocaine self-administration (Gauthier et al. 2017). EE has been shown to increase GluA1 and phosphorylated GluA1 at serine 845 (pSer845GluA1) protein levels in the BLA and NAc but to decrease pSer845GluA1 level in the PFC (Gauthier et al. 2017). These neuroadaptations are believed to contribute to the EE-induced behavioral changes in drug self-administration and seeking. Given that GluA1-containing AMPA receptors are located primarily on GABA interneurons in the BLA (which control excitability of BLA projection neurons) (McDonald 1996) and that BLA GABA interneurons receive direct inputs from PFC glutamatergic neurons (Rosenkranz and Grace 2002), it is conceivable that EE, by modulating this circuitry, facilitates the extinction of cocaine seeking and reduces propensity for relapse (Gauthier et al. 2017).

5.4. Effects of EE on the hippocampus

The literature provides an abundance of convincing evidence that EE can induce structural, biochemical and functional changes in the hippocampus, a limbic region highly implicated in learning and memory. For example, EE can alter neuronal behavior (i.e., excitatory post-synaptic potentials, long-term potentiation and long-term depression) in the hippocampus (Foster et al. 1996; Duffy et al. 2001; van Praag et al. 2005; Artola et al. 2006; Hosseiny et al. 2014). Other forms of EE-induced hippocampal neuroplasticity include: neurogenesis (Kempermann et al. 1997, 1998; Brown et al. 2003; van Praag et al. 2005), synaptogenesis (Sager et al. 2018; Cefis et al. 2019), alterations in BDNF (Neeper et al. 1996; Ickes et al. 2000; Vaynman et al. 2003; Zajac et al. 2010) and nerve growth factor (NGF) (Neeper et al. 1996; Pham et al. 1999; Hall and Savage 2016), both of which support the viability and functions of neurons and are likely mediators of activity-dependent changes in the hippocampus. EE-induced morphological changes in the hippocampus include increases in hippocampal thickness (Rosenzweig 1966), dendritic arborization (Fiala et al. 1978) and the number of glial cells (Walsh et al. 1969). EE-induced modification in hippocampal glutamatergic (Mlynarik et al. 2004; Naka et al. 2005; Segovia et al. 2006; Andin et al. 2007), cholinergic (Hall and Savage 2016), GABAergic (Frick et al. 2003; Segovia et al. 2006), norepinephrinergic (Galani et al. 2007) and serotonergic (Rasmuson et al. 1998; Galani et al. 2007; Pang et al. 2009) transmission have also been reported. Likewise, alterations in the expression of proteins related to hippocampal ERK, CREB, PKA, PKC, CAMKII, MAPK signaling have also been noted in rodents exposed to EE (Shen et al. 2001; Williams et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2016a; Cardoso et al. 2017). Given that these signaling molecules play critical roles in synaptic plasticity (Malinow et al. 1989; Meffert et al. 1991; Schulman 1995; Lisman et al. 2002) and addiction-related behaviors (Ortiz et al. 1995; Levine et al. 2005; Lu et al. 2006; Lee and Messing 2008) and can be altered by environmental experiences, it is reasonable to suggest that EE, by providing multidimensional stimulation, rewires hippocampal-centered circuits, generates new connections that augment the values of non-drug rewards while weakening the values of drug-based memories. In support of this hypothesis are findings that mice exposed to 30 days of EE intervention after cocaine conditioning show a lack of CPP and less CPP-induced cfos activation in the hippocampus (Chauvet et al. 2011). It’s been reported that for mice engaged in alcohol consumption 21 days of concurrent exposure to a running wheel were sufficient to increase BDNF hippocampal levels and reduce alcohol consumption (Gallego et al. 2015). Morphine-treated rats that received EE exposure (group housing) concurrent with morphine treatment had higher hippocampal BDNF levels that correlated with better water-maze performance as compared to morphine-treated rats housed in isolation (non-EE exposure) (Famitafreshi et al. 2016). BDNF together with its receptor TrkB is essential for hippocampal neurogenesis that has been suggested as a key mediator underlying EE-induced reductions in drug-related effects, including methamphetamine self-administration and reinstatement of methamphetamine seeking (Mandyam and Koob 2012; Recinto et al. 2012). However, recent studies demonstrated that EE (wheel running)-induced reductions in the escalation of methamphetamine self-administration and drug seeking occurred independently of EE-induced neurogenesis (Engelmann et al. 2014; Sobieraj et al. 2016), suggesting that other forms of neuroplasticity might control these beneficial effects of EE. Clearly, more studies are needed to fully understand the neurobiology of EE’s therapeutic and preventative benefits against drug effects.

6. Summary

The complexities of the behavioral and neurobiological factors underlying SUDs create enormous challenges in efforts to develop effective pharmacological treatments. Although traditional pharmacological approaches to combat SUDs have provided encouraging results at a preclinical level, limited success has been achieved at a clinical level. Despite many years of intense research in medication development, SUDs still remain a serious problem, affecting millions of lives and for which long-term effective treatments are at best sparse. Given the current opioid crisis and the urgent need for more efficacious treatments, new strategies are being explored. Current preclinical and clinical data indicate that EE is an effective intervention for the treatment of SUDs as it has the ability to control impulsive drug taking, attenuate the rewarding (and reinforcing) effects of drugs, reduce the effectiveness of drug cues, and, very importantly, reduce craving and relapse. Importantly, EE might be effective because it does not depend on new learning that is effective only within specific (e.g., clinical) contexts and under specific conditions. EE produces profound neuroplasticity in regions of the brain that are strongly implicated in reward processing, incentive motivation, reward-related learning and habit formation and compulsivity, all behaviors at the heart of addiction development, maintenance and recurrence. The identification of the neuroplastic changes induced by EE over the past few decades has shed new light on the underlying mechanisms by which EE produces its protective and therapeutic effects against drug addiction and may constitute a pathway through which we may expand the therapeutic possibilities for treating SUDs.

Table 1:

A summary of preclinical studies assessing therapeutic potential of EE as a behavioral intervention implemented after or concurrently to drug exposure in animal models of addiction.

Type of EE Treatment duration and onset Species Drug Outcome Reference
Intravenous self-administration
 wheel 19 days concurrent with drug acquisition session Rats Cocaine Self-administration ↓ Cosgrove et al. 2002
 wheel 16 days concurrent with drug acquisition session Rats Cocaine Self-administration ↓ Zlebnik et al. 2012
 wheel-concurrent 14 days concurrent with drug acquisition session Rats METH Self-administration ↓ Miller et al. 2012
 wheel 19 days (22 hrs daily) concurrent with drug acquisition Rats METH Self-administration ↓ Aarde et al. 2015
 social, toys 23 days concurrent with drug acquisition Rats Cocaine Self-administration ↓ Puhl et al. 2012
 social, toys, wheel 4 hr-sessions prior and after 3 extinction sessions Rats Cocaine Reacquisition of self-administration ↓ Gauthier et al. 2017

Extinction
 social, toys, wheel 4 hr-sessions prior and after 3 extinction sessions Rats Cocaine Exinction responding ↓ Gauthier et al. 2017
 social, toys, wheel 30 or 90 days during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Exinction responding ↓ Chauvet et al. 2009
 wheel 10 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence + 5 extinction days Rats Nicotine Exinction responding ↓ in males but not females Sanchez et al. 2014
 wheel 10 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence + 5 extinction days Rats Nicotine Exinction responding ↓ Sanchez et al. 2013
 wheel 21 days during forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats METH Extinction responding↓ Sobieraj et al. 2016
 wheel 14 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Extinction responding↓ Lynch et al. 2010
 wheel 10 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence + 5 extinction days Female Rats Nicotine Extinction responding↓ during estrus Lynch et al. 2019
 wheel 14 days during forced abstinence (1, 2, 6 hrs daily) + 5 days Rats Cocaine Extinction responding↓ with 6 hr access Peterson et al. 2014b
 toys, wheel 30 days during forced abstinence + 15 days during extinction Rats Heroin Extinction responding – Galaj et al. 2016
 social, toys 60 days of forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats Cocaine Extinction responding↓ in adolescents Li and Frantz 2017
Extinction responding – in adults
 social, toys, wheel 21–28 days during forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats Heroin Extinction responding↓ Sikora et al. 2018
METH Extinction responding↓
Nicotine Extinction responding↓
 wheel First \Last 7 or all 14 days (2hrs daily) of forced abstinence + 5 days Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ (EE during first 7 days) Beiter et al. 2016
Cue induced reinstatement ↓ (EE during 14 days)
 wheel 14 days 6 hrs daily during extinction Female Rats Cocaine Extinction responding – Zlebnik et al. 2010

Cue-induced Reinstatement
 toys, wheel 30 days during forced abstinence+ 15 days during extinction Rats Heroin Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Galaj et al. 2016
 social, toys, wheel 31 days during forced abstinence Rats Heroin Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Thiel et al. 2010
 wheel 10 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence + 5 extinction days Rats Nicotine Cue induced reinstatement – Sanchez et al. 2013
 social, toys, wheel 21 days during forced abstincence + 1 extinction/reinstatement day Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Thiel et al. 2009
 wheel 10 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence + 5 extinction days Rats Nicotine Cue induced reinstatement – Sanchez et al. 2014
 wheel 14 days during forced abstinence (1, 2, 6, 24 hrs daily) + 5 days Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ in males Peterson et al. 2014a
Cue induced reinstatement ↓ in non-estrus females
Cue induced reinstatement – in estrus females
 social, toys, wheel 30 or 90 days during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Chauvet et al. 2009
 social, toys 60 days during forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats Cocaine Cue-induced reinstatement ↓ in adolescents Li and Frantz 2017
Cue-induced reinstatement – in adults
 Wheel running 21 days during forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats METH Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Sobieraj et al. 2016
 Wheel running 14 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Lynch et al. 2010
 Wheel running 10 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence + 5 extinction days Female Rats Nicotine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ during estrus Lynch et al. 2019
Cue induced reinstatement – during non-estrus
 Wheel running First \Last 7 or all 14 days (2hrs daily) of forced abstinence + 5 days Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ (EE during first 7 days) Beiter et al. 2016; Abel et al. 2019
Cue induced reinstatement ↓ (EE during 14 days)
Cue induced reinstatement – (EE during last 7 days)
 social, toys 30 days during forced abstinence+ 10 days during extinction Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Ranaldi et al. 2011
 social, toys, wheel 21–28 days during forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats Heroin Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Sikora et al. 2018
METH Cue induced reinstatement ↓
Nicotine Cue induced reinstatement ↓
 wheel + atomoxetine 15 days during cocaine use + 14 extinction days (6 hrs daily) Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓ Zlebnik and Carroll 2015
 wheel 14 days during forced abstinence (1, 2, 6 hrs daily) + 5 days Rats Cocaine Cue induced reinstatement ↓with 6 hr daily access Peterson et al. 2014b

Stress-induced reinstatement
 social, toys, wheel 30 or 90 days during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Stress-induced reinstatement ↓ Chauvet et al. 2009
 treadmill 42 days (1 hr daily) during forced abstinence Female Rats Cocaine Stress-induced reinstatement ↓ Robison et al. 2018a

Drug-induced reinstatement
 social, toys, wheel 30 or 90 days during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Cocaine induced reinstatement – Chauvet et al. 2009
 social, toys 60 days during forced abstinence + 6 extinction days Rats Cocaine Cocaine induced reinstatement ↓ Li and Frantz 2017
 treadmill 6 weeks during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine Cocaine induced reinstatement ↓ Thanos et al. 2013
 wheel 14 days 6 hrs daily during extinction Female Rats Cocaine Cocaine induced reinstatement ↓ Zlebnik et al. 2010
 social, toys, wheel 5 days during CPP extinction Mice Ethanol Ethanol induced CPP reinstatement ↓ Li et al. 2015a
 social, toys, wheel 30 days during forced abstinence Mice Cocaine Cocaine induced reinstatement ↓ Solinas et al. 2008
 wheel + atomoxetine 15 days during cocaine use + 14 extinction days (6 hrs daily) Rats Cocaine Cocaine induced reinstatement – Zlebnik and Carroll 2015

Abstinence-Conflict model
 toys, wheel until abstinence criteria Rats Heroin Abstinence ↑ Peck et al. 2015
 toys, wheel until abstinence criteria Rats Cocaine Abstinence ↑ Ewing and Ranaldi 2018

Conditioned place preference
 wheel 22 days during forced abstinence + 8 days concurrent with extinction Mice Cocaine CPP ↓ Mustroph et al. 2011
18 days prior to drug exposure + 12 during conditioning/extinction CPP ↑
 social, toys, wheel 30 days during forced abstinence Mice Cocaine CPP ↓ Solinas et al. 2008
 wheel 4 weeks concurrent with extinction Mice Cocaine CPP ↓ Mustroph et al. 2016
 social as drug alternative during conditioning Rats Cocaine CPP ↓ Fritz et al. 2011
 social as drug alternative during conditioning Rats AMPH CPP ↓ Yates et al. 2013
 toys, wheel 30 days during forced abstinence Rats Heroin CPP ↓ Galaj et al. 2016
 social, toys 30 days during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine CPP ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 social, toys, wheel 30 days during forced abstinence Rats Cocaine CPP ↓ Galaj et al 2017

Table 2.

A summary of preclinical studies assessing the effects of EE on neuronal plasticity.

Type of EE EE duration + onset Species Outcome Reference
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
 social, toys, wheel 10 weeks from P 21 Rats no change in dendritic aborization Kolb et al. 2003
 social, toys 60 days from P 21 Rats mGluRs ↓ IC rats relative to EE or SD; no change in EE Melendez et al 2004
 social 50 days from P 22 Rats pruning of dendritic length Himmler et al. 2013
 social dentritic arborization ↓
cell responsiveness to nicotine ↑
 social 20 days from P 21 Hamsters dentritic arborization ↓ Burleson et al. 2016
 social, toys 32–35 days from P 21 Rats DAT cell surface expression ↓ Zhu et al. 2005
 social, toys 70 days from P 21 Rats does not alter VMAT2 function Hofford et al. 2014
 social, toys 2 months from P 532 Rats Parvalbumin GABA positive cells ↑ Sampedro-Piquero et al. 2016
 social, toys 77 days from P 30 Rats extracellular 5-HT concentration ↑ Brenes et al. 2008
no change in extracellular NE concentration
 social, toys 21 days from P 30 Rats c-fos ↑ in PFC and OFC as compared to IC Sampedro-Piquero et al. 2015
c-fos ↓ in IFC as compared to IC
 social 1 session (15 min) at P 21 Rats no change in opioid receptor binding Vanderschuren et al. 1995
 social 13 days from P 21 Rats D2-expressing cells as compared to IC ↓ Han et al 2012
 social 9 weeks from P 21 Mice AMPA (GluR1, 2, 5) expression as compared to IC ↓ Araki et al 2014
 social, toys 30 days at P 84 Rats no change in NE or DA concentration Galani et al. 2007
no change in NE or DA concentration
 social 8 weeks from P 21 Rats NMDA NR2A, as compared to IC ↓ Turnock-Jones et al.2009
no change in NMDA NR1A, NR2B mRNA and protein level
 social 9 weeks from P 21 Rats dendritic aborization and length ↑ Wang et al. 2012
 wheel 21 days from P 90 Rats cocaine-induced cfos ↑ Zlebnik et al. 2014
 social, toys 30 days from P 30 Rats DAT function ↓ Zhu et al. 2004
DA metabolism ↓
AMPA pSer845GluA1 expression ↓ (when EE+ extinction training)
 social, toys, wheel 32–35 days from P 21 Rats DAT function ↓ in mPFC but not OFC Darna et al. 2015
 social, toys 2 months from P 21 Mice no change in FAAH, CB1, MGL mRNA El Rawas et al. 2011
 treadmill 7 days from P 280 Rats BDNF Activity ↑ Cefis et al. 2019
BDNFp-TrkB receptors ↑
synaptophysin (synaptogenesis) ↑
exercise-induced cfos activation ↑
 social 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats no change in cocaine cue-induced fosB El Rawas er al. 2012
 wheel 14 days (2 hrs daily) during forced abstinence Rats pERK levels ↓ as compared to sedentary Lynch et al. 2010
 social, toys, wheel 30 days afer cocaine exposure Mice cocaine cue-induce cFos activation ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 social, toys, wheel 6 sessions after cocaine exposure Rats AMPA pSer845GluA1 expression ↑ (when EE alone) Gauthier et al. 2017
 social, toys, wheel 31 days during forced abstinence Rats cocaine cue induced cfos activation ↓ Thiel et al. 2010
 wheel 14 days during forced abstinence + 5 days Rats BDNF exon IV expression ↓ Peterson et al. 2014b
 wheel 7 or 14 days after cocaine use Rats mGlu5 mRNA expression ↑ (with EE during first 7 days) Abel et al. 2019
no change in mGlu5 mRNA expression (with EE during last 7 days)

NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS
 social, toys, wheel 10 weeks from P 21 Rats dendritic aborization ↑ Kolb et al. 2003
 social 4 sessions (15 min) at P 50–63 Rats mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 ↓ Salti et al. 2015
 social 1 session (15 min) at P 21 Rats opioid receptor binding ↓ Vanderschuren et al. 1995
 social, repeated handling 64 days from P 21 Rats DA release in response to amphetamine in IC ↑ Hall et al. 1998
no effect on DA-induced cAMP accumulation D2 inhibition of DA-induced cAMP
accumulationin IC ↓
 social, toys 30 days from P 28 Rats no change in AMPA GluR1 Wood et al. 2005
NMDA NR1 ↑ as compared to IC
 social 13 days from P 21 Rats D2-expressing cells as compared to IC ↓ Han et al 2012
 social 9 weeks from P 21 Mice no change in AMPA (GluR1, 2, 5) expression no change in GluR1 Ser845 phosphorylation Araki et al 2014
 social 8 weeks from P 21 Rats pulse-induced DA release as compared to IC ↓ Karkhanis et al. 2019
no change in VMAT2, Synaptogyrin-3, Syntaxin-1, Munc13–3 TH expression as compared to IC ↓
 social 4 weeks from P 21 Mice sEPSC and mEPSC, as compared to IC ↓ Zhang et al 2019
instrinsic excitability of MSNs, as compared to IC ↓
 social, toys 77 days from P 30 Rats no change in extracellular 5-HT Brenes et al. 2008
concentration extracellular NE
concentration ↑
 social 8 weeks from P 21 Rats no change in NMDA receptor mRNA and protein level Turnock-Jones et al.2009
 social 8–9 weeks from P 28 Rats dendritic length ↑ Wang et al. 2012
 wheel 21 days from P 90 Rats cocaine-induced cfos ↑ Zlebnik et al. 2014
 wheel 6 weeks in young adulthood Rats Delta-opioid receptor mRNA ↑ Greenwood at al. 2011
D2 receptors ↓
no change in kappa-opioid, D1, dynorphin mRNA
wheel running-induced cfos ↑
 treadmill 5 min, 5 days or 6 weeks at P 60 Rats D1 receptor binding ↓ Robinson et al. 2018
no change in DAT binding
 social, toys 30 days from P 30 Rats no change inDA clearance/ DAT function Zhu et al. 2004
 social, toys 30 days from P 30 Rats in NAcore baseline and nicotine DA clearance Zhu et al. 2013
nicotine DA clearance ↑ in NA shell but ↓ in NA core
 social, toys/ no toys 20 days from P 23 Rats cocaine-induced DAT protein ↑ in IC, but ↓ in EE Zakharova et al. 2009
no change in cocaine-induced DARPP-32
cocaine-induced TH ↑ in IC, no change in EE
 social 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP rats cocaine-induced Zif-268 ↓ Fritz et al. 2011
 social, toys, wheel 2–3 months from P 21 Mice cocaine-induced Zif-268 activation ↓ Solinas et al. 2009
 social, toys, wheel 2 months from P 21 Mice MAP3K12 mRNA expression ↑ Thiriet et al. 2008
DNM1L mRNA expression ↑
PKC lambda mRNA expression↑
DEC mRNA expression ↓
PSMD4 mRNA expression ↓
 social, toys 2 months and during cocaine use from P 21 Rats PKC signaling ↑ Lichti et al. 2014
CREB signaling↑
ERK/ MAPK signaling ↑
proteins needed for energy production, mRNA splicing, and ubiquitination ↑
vesiculr glutamate and monoamine transporters expression ↑
 social, toys 30 days at P 84 Rats Serotonin concentration ↓ Galani et al. 2007
Norepinepherine concentration ↑
no change in dopamine concentration
 social, toys, wheel 6 sessions after cocaine exposure Rats no change in AMPA GluA1 or pSer845GluA1 expression Gauthier et al. 2017
AMPA pSer845GluA1 expression ↓ (when EE+ extinction training)
 social, toys, wheel 2 months from P 21 Mice cocaine-induced c-Fos activation ↓ Bezard et al. 2003
BDNF ↑
no change in D1 or D2 mRNA
 social, toys, wheel 30 days afer cocaine exposure Mice cocaine cue-induced cFos activation ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 social, toys 7 days from P 28–30 Rats Non-CA permeable AMPAR’s ↑ Ma et al. 2016
 social, toys, wheel 1, 7 or 30 days Mice cocaine cue-induced cFos activation ↓ Solinas et al. 2008
 social, toys, wheel 31 days during forced abstinence Rats cocaine cue induced cfos activation ↓ Thiel et al. 2010
 social, toys, wheel Rearing (1 month) Rats no change in cocaine induced FosB Zhang et al. 2014

DORSAL STRIATUM
 treadmill running 5 min, 5 days or 6 weeks at P60 Rats D2 receptor-binding ↑ Robinson et al. 2018
no change in DAT binding
 social, toys, wheel 2 months from P 21 Mice cocaine-induced C-fos mRNA ↑ Bezard et al. 2003
BDNF ↑
DAT mRNA and binding ↓
no change in D1 or D2 mRNA
 social, toys, wheel 30 days afer cocaine exposure Mice cocaine cue-induced cFos activation ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 social, toys 30 days from P 30 Rats no change in DAT function Zhu et al. 2004
 social, toys 70 days from P 21 Rats no change in DAT function Hofford et al. 2014
 social, toys 2 months from P 21 Mice no change in FAAH, CB1, MGL mRNA El Rawas et al. 2011
 social 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats no change in cocaine cue-induced fosB activation El Rawas er al. 2012
 social, toys, wheel 31 days during forced abstinence Rats no change in cocaine cue-induced cfos activation Thiel et al. 2010
 social, toys, wheel 2–3 months from P 21 Mice cocaine-induced Delta-Fos B activation ↑ Solinas et al. 2009

AMYGDALA
 social 1 session (15 min) at P 21 Rats no change in opioid receptor binding Vanderschuren et al. 1995
 social 10 sessions with discrete choice trials Rats c-fos activation in PKC-expressing inhibitory neurons ↑ Venniro et al. 2018
 social 6 weeks from P 21 Rats DAT ↓ as compared to IC Karkhanis et al. 2015
Rats no change in NET
alcohol-induced DA release as compared to IC ↑
alcohol-induced NE release as compared to IC ↓
 social 8–9 weeks from P 28 Rats dendritic aborization and length ↓ Wang et al. 2012
 social 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats cocaine-induced Zif-268 activation ↓ Fritz et al. 2011
 social, toys 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats cocaine cue-induced fosB activation ↓ El Rawas er al. 2012
pCREB ↑
 social, toys, wheel 30 days afer cocaine exposure Mice cocaine cue-induced cFos activation ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 social, toys 2 months from P 21 Mice FAAH mRNA ↑ El Rawas et al. 2011
CB1 mRNA in BLA ↑ but ↓ in BMA
no change in MGL
 social, toys, wheel 6 sessions after cocaine exposure Rats no change in AMPA GluA1 or pSer845GluA1 expression Gauthier et al. 2017
 social, toys 4, 15 minute sessions Rats zif268 activation ↓ as compared to IC Zernig and Pinheiro 2015
 social, toys 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats no change in cocaine cue-induced fosB El Rawas er al. 2012

HIPPOCAMPUS
 social, toys, wheel 8 weeks from P 21 Mice morphological changes in astrocytes Viola et al. 2009
 social, toys 4–5 weeks from P 36–45 Rats synaptic strength ↑ Foster et al. 1996
 social, toys, wheel 40 days from P 21 Mice Neurogenesis ↑ Kempermann et al. 1997
 social, toys, wheel 68 days from P 168 or P 504 Mice Neurogensis ↑ Kempermann et al. 1998
 wheel 45 days from P 84 or P 504 Mice Neurogensis ↑ van Praag et al. 2005
 social, toys 34 days from P 50 Rats BDNF ↑ Fakelnberg et al. 1992
 social, toys 6 weeks from P 70 Rats BDNF ↑ Bakos et al 2009
glucocorticoid receptor ↓
no change in AMPA GluR1 and mGluR5
 social 9 weeks from P 21 Mice no change in AMPA (GluR1, 2, 5) expression Araki et al 2014
no change in GluR1 Ser845 phosphorylation
 wheel 2, 4, 7 nights from P 100 Rats BDNF ↑ Neeper et al. 1996
NGF ↑
 social, toys 4 weeks from P 25 or 12 weeks from P 145 Rats Dentritic branching ↑ in adolescents Fiala et al. 1978
 social, toys 90 days from P 25 Rats Glial Cells ↑ Walsh et al. 1969
no change in thickness
 social, toys 33 days from P 56 Rats AMPA GluR1 mRNA ↑ Mlynarik et al. 2004
no change in AMPA NR2A or NR2B
 wheel 2 weeks after thiamine deficiency Rats Cholinergic functioning ↑ Hall and Savage 2016
NGF ↑
 social, toys, wheel 25 days from P 196 Mice GAD ↑ Frick et al. 2003
no change in synaptophysin (synaptogenesis)
 social, toys 30 days from P 84 Rats 5-HT concentration ↓ Galani et al. 2007
NE concentration ↑
no change in dopamine concentration
 social, toys 30 days from P 52 Rats 5-HT1A mRNA and binding ↑ Rasmuson et al. 1998
no change in 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptor mRNA
 wheel 1, 3 or 7 days from P 84 Rat CREB phosphorylation ↑ Shen et al. 2001
MAPK phosphorylation ↑
 social, toys, wheel 30 days afer cocaine exposure Mice cocaine cue-induced cFos activation ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 wheel 21 days concurent with alcohol from P 25 Mice BDNF mRNA and protein level ↑ Gallego et al. 2015
 social, toys, wheel 8 weeks from P 28 Mice PKA dependent LTP ↑ Duffy et al. 2001
 social, toys, wheel/ no wheel 43 days at P 84 Mice Neurogensis ↑ Brown et al. 2003
 treadmill 7 days at P 280 Rats BDNF Activity ↑ Cefis et al. 2019
BDNFp-TrkB receptors ↑
synaptophysin (synaptogenesis) ↑
exercise-induced cfos activation ↑
 social, toys 1 year at P 56 Rats NGF concentration and NGF receptor density ↑ Pham et al. 1999
 social, toys, wheel 40 days from P 28 Mice AMPA GluR2 and GluR4 mRNA ↑ Naka et al. 2005
 social, toys, wheel 8 weeks from P 54 or P 700 Rats Neurogensis in young rats ↑ Segovia et al. 2006
Extracellular GABA in old rats ↑
Rats Extracellular Glutamate in old rats ↑
 social, toys, wheel 59 days from P 35 or P 100 Mice CREB expression ↑ in young mice Williams et al. 2001
 social, toys, wheel 30 days in adulthood (age not spefiied) Rats BDNF expression ↑ Zhang et al. 2016a
CREB phosphorylation protein expression ↑
SDF-1 receptor protein expression ↑
CXCR4 receptor protein expression ↑
no change in PKA C-alpha protein expression
Neurogenesis of neurons but not astrocytes ↑
 social 3–5 weeks from P 96 Rats LTP ↑ Artola et al. 2006
LTD ↑
 treadmill 10 days from P 504 Rats ERK activation ↓ Cardoso et al. 2017
p38 activation ↓
no change in Akt, mTOR, pTOS6K, CREB protein expression
 social, toys, wheel Mice Glutamatergic synapses ↑ Hosseiny et al. 2014
LTP ↑ (after 8 weeks of EE)
LTP ↓ (after 4 weeks of EE)
No change in LTP (after 6 weeks of EE)
 social, toys, wheel 6 sessions after cocaine exposure Rats no change in AMPA GluA1 or pSer845GluA1 expression Gauthier et al. 2017

VENTRAL TEGMENTAL AREA
 social 1 session (15 min) at P 21 Rats no change in opioid receptor binding Vanderschuren et al. 1995
 wheel 6 weeks in young adulthood Rats TH mRNA ↑ Greenwood at al. 2011
no change in D2 mRNA
 social 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats cocaine-induced Zif-268 activation ↓ Fritz et al. 2011
 social, toys 2 months from P 21 Mice no change in FAAH, CB1, MGL mRNA El Rawas et al. 2011
 social 4 sessions (15 min) after cocaine CPP Rats no change in cocaine cue-induced fosB El Rawas er al. 2012
 social, toys, wheel 30 days afer cocaine exposure Mice cocaine cue-induce cFos activation ↓ Chauvet et al. 2011
 social, toys, wheel 31 days during forced abstinence Rats Cue induced cfos activation ↓ Thiel et al. 2010

Highlights.

Preclinical research suggests environmental enrichment is an effective behavioral strategy to reduce drug-related behaviors

Environmental enrichment leads to neural adaptations in brain regions highly implicated in drug reward and use disorder

Evidence suggests that environmental enrichment is beneficial for individuals struggling with substance use disorder

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health under award number 1SC3GM130430-01.

Abbreviations

5-HT

serotonin

Akt

protein kinase B

AMPA

A-Amino-3-Hydroxy-5-Methyl-4-Isoxazolepropionic Acid

BDNF

Brain derived neurotropic factor

BLA

basolateral amygdala

BMA

basomedial amygdala

cAMP

cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CB

cannabinoid receptor

c-fos

early immune gene cfos

CREB

cAMP response element-binding protein

CXCR

C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4

DARPP

dopamine and cAMP regulated phosphoprotein-mw 32

DAT

dopamine transporter

DEC

decorin

delta fos B

transcription factor delta fos b

DNM1L

dynamin 1-like

EE

environmental enrichment

ERK

extracellular regulated kinase

FAAH

Fatty-acid amide hydrolase

GABA

gamma-aminobutyric acid

GAD

glutamic acid decarboxylase

IC

isolated condition

ILC

infralimbic cortex

LTP

long-term potentiation

LTD

long term depression

MAP3K12

mitogen-activated protein kinase 12

MAPK

mitogen activated protein kinase

mEPSC

miniature excitatory post synaptic current

MGL

Monoacylglycerol lipase

mGlu (1–5)

metabotropic glutamate receptors

mRNA

messenger ribonucleic acid

MSN

medium spiny neuron

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

NA

sodium

NE

norepinephrine

NET

norepinephrine transporter

NGF

nerve growth factor

NR2A NR2B

Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 2A and 2B

OFC

orbitofrontal cortex

p38

p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase

P70S6K

p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase

pCREB

cAMP response element binding protein

pERK

protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase

PFC

prefrontal cortex

PKA

cAMP-dependent protein kinase

PKC

protein kinase C

Prkcl

Protein kinase C, lambda

PSMD4

Proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 4

SD

standard condition

SDF-1

stromal cell-derived factor 1

sEPSC

spontaneous excitatory post synaptic current

TH

Tyrosine Hydroxelase

VMAT2

Vesicular monoamine transporter 2

VMAT

vesicular monoamine transporter

Zif268

early immune gene/ zinc finger transcription factor 268

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Aarde SM, Miller ML, Creehan KM, et al. (2015) One day access to a running wheel reduces self-administration of D-methamphetamine, MDMA and methylone. Drug Alcohol Depend 151:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdolahi A, Acosta G, Breslin FJ, et al. (2010) Incubation of nicotine seeking is associated with enhanced protein kinase A-regulated signaling of dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa in the insular cortex. Eur J Neurosci 31:733–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07114.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abel JM, Nesil T, Bakhti-Suroosh A, et al. (2019) Mechanisms underlying the efficacy of exercise as an intervention for cocaine relapse: a focus on mGlu5 in the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 236:2155–2171. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05208-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abroms LC, Leavitt LE, Van Alstyne JM, et al. (2015) A Motion Videogame for Opioid Relapse Prevention. Games Health J 4:494–501. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Acheson A, Conover JC, Fandl JP, et al. (1995) A BDNF autocrine loop in adult sensory neurons prevents cell death. Nature 374:450–453. doi: 10.1038/374450a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andin J, Hallbeck M, Mohammed AH, Marcusson J (2007) Influence of environmental enrichment on steady-state mRNA levels for EAAC1, AMPA1 and NMDA2A receptor subunits in rat hippocampus. Brain Research 1174:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Araki R, Ago Y, Hasebe S, et al. (2014) Involvement of prefrontal AMPA receptors in encounter stimulation-induced hyperactivity in isolation-reared mice. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 17:883–893. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arendash GW, Garcia MF, Costa DA, et al. (2004) Environmental enrichment improves cognition in aged Alzheimer’s transgenic mice despite stable beta-amyloid deposition. Neuroreport 15:1751–1754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Artola A, von Frijtag JC, Fermont PC, et al. (2006) Long-lasting modulation of the induction of LTD and LTP in rat hippocampal CA1 by behavioural stress and environmental enrichment. The European journal of neuroscience 23:261–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04552.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakos J, Hlavacova N, Rajman M, et al. (2009) Enriched environment influences hormonal status and hippocampal brain derived neurotrophic factor in a sex dependent manner. Neuroscience 164:788–97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bardo MT, Bevins RA (2000) Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology 153:31–43. doi: 10.1007/s002130000569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bardo MT, Bowling SL, Pierce RC (1990) Changes in locomotion and dopamine neurotransmission following amphetamine, haloperidol, and exposure to novel environmental stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 101:338–343. doi: 10.1007/bf02244051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bardo MT, Bowling SL, Rowlett JK, et al. (1995) Enviromental enrichment attenuates locomotor sensitization, but not in vitro dopamine release, induced by amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 51:397–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bardo MT, Klebaur JE, Valone JM, Deaton C (2001) Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous self-administration of amphetamine in female and male rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 155:278–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Barnett NP, Celio MA, Tidey JW, et al. (2017) A preliminary randomized controlled trial of contingency management for alcohol use reduction using a transdermal alcohol sensor. Addiction 112:1025–1035. doi: 10.1111/add.13767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bassuk EL, Hanson J, Greene RN, et al. (2016) Peer-Delivered Recovery Support Services for Addictions in the United States: A Systematic Review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 63:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Beaufour CC, Le Bihan C, Hamon M, Thiébot M-H (2001) Extracellular dopamine in the rat prefrontal cortex during reward-, punishment- and novelty-associated behaviour: Effects of diazepam. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 69:133–142. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00492-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Beiter RM, Peterson AB, Abel J, Lynch WJ (2016) Exercise during early, but not late abstinence, attenuates subsequent relapse vulnerability in a rat model. Transl Psychiatry 6:e792. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bekinschtein P, Cammarota M, Katche C, et al. (2008) BDNF is essential to promote persistence of long-term memory storage. PNAS 105:2711–2716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711863105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Belke TW, Wagner JP (2005) The reinforcing property and the rewarding aftereffect of wheel running in rats: a combination of two paradigms. Behav Processes 68:165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bennett EL, Diamond MC, Krech D, Rosenzweig MR (1964) Chemical and anatomical plasticity of brain. Science 146:610–619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bennett LW, Cardone S, Jarczyk J (1998) Effects of a therapeutic camping program on addiction recovery. The Algonquin Haymarket Relapse Prevention Program. Journal of substance abuse treatment 15:469–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bernstein J, Bernstein E, Tassiopoulos K, et al. (2005) Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend 77:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bezard E, Dovero S, Belin D, et al. (2003) Enriched environment confers resistance to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine and cocaine: involvement of dopamine transporter and trophic factors. J Neurosci 23:10999–11007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bienkowski P, Rogowski A, Korkosz A, et al. (2004) Time-dependent changes in alcohol-seeking behaviour during abstinence. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 14:355–360. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2003.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Blondell RD, Looney SW, Northington AP, et al. (2001) Can recovering alcoholics help hospitalized patients with alcohol problems? J Fam Pract 50:447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bock BC, Dunsiger SI, Ciccolo JT, et al. (2019) Exercise Videogames, Physical Activity, and Health: Wii Heart Fitness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Prev Med 56:501–511. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bond J, Kaskutas LA, Weisner C (2003) The persistent influence of social networks and alcoholics anonymous on abstinence. J Stud Alcohol 64:579–588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bradizza CM, Stasiewicz PR, Paas ND (2006) Relapse to alcohol and drug use among individuals diagnosed with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders: A review. Clinical Psychology Review 26:162–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Bregolin T, Pinheiro BS, El Rawas R, Zernig G (2017) Preventive Strength of Dyadic Social Interaction against Reacquisition/Reexpression of Cocaine Conditioned Place Preference. Front Behav Neurosci 11:225. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Brené S, Bjørnebekk A, Aberg E, et al. (2007) Running is rewarding and antidepressive. Physiol Behav 92:136–140. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Brenes JC, Rodriguez O, Fornaguera J (2008) Differential effect of environment enrichment and social isolation on depressive-like behavior, spontaneous activity and serotonin and norepinephrine concentration in prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 89:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Brown J, Cooper‐Kuhn CM, Kempermann G, et al. (2003) Enriched environment and physical activity stimulate hippocampal but not olfactory bulb neurogenesis. European Journal of Neuroscience 17:2042–2046. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02647.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bunzeck N, Düzel E (2006) Absolute coding of stimulus novelty in the human substantia nigra/VTA. Neuron 51:369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Burleson CA, Pedersen RW, Seddighi S, et al. (2016) Social play in juvenile hamsters alters dendritic morphology in the medial prefrontal cortex and attenuates effects of social stress in adulthood. Behav Neurosci 130:437–447. doi: 10.1037/bne0000148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Burns LH, Annett L, Kelley AE, et al. (1996) Effects of lesion to amygdala, ventral subiculum,medial prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens on the reaction to novelty:implication for limbic-striatal interactions. Behavioral Neuroscience 110:60–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Calcagnetti DJ, Schechter MD (1992) Place conditioning reveals the rewarding aspect of social interaction in juvenile rats. Physiol Behav 51:667–672. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90101-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cardoso FDS, França EF, Serra FT, et al. (2017) Aerobic exercise reduces hippocampal ERK and p38 activation and improves memory of middle-aged rats. Hippocampus 27:899–905. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Carroll ME, Comer SD (1996) Animal models of relapse. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 4:11–18 [Google Scholar]
  40. Cefis M, Prigent-Tessier A, Quirié A, et al. (2019) The effect of exercise on memory and BDNF signaling is dependent on intensity. Brain Struct Funct 224:1975–1985. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01889-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chauvet C, Goldberg SR, Jaber M, Solinas M (2012) Effects of environmental enrichment on the incubation of cocaine craving. Neuropharmacology 63:635–641. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chauvet C, Lardeux V, Goldberg SR, et al. (2009) Environmental enrichment reduces cocaine seeking and reinstatement induced by cues and stress but not by cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:2767–78. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Chauvet C, Lardeux V, Jaber M, Solinas M (2011) Brain regions associated with the reversal of cocaine conditioned place preference by environmental enrichment. Neuroscience 184:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Clarke RS, Heron W, Fetherstonhaugh ML, et al. (1951) Individual differences in dogs: preliminary report on the effects of early experience. Can J Psychol 5:150–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Cole SW, Yoo DJ, Knutson B (2012) Interactivity and reward-related neural activation during a serious videogame. PLoS ONE 7:e33909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Colon-Berezin C, Nolan ML, Blachman-Forshay J, Paone D (2019) Overdose Deaths Involving Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogs - New York City, 2000–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 68:37–40. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6802a3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Cooper A, Barnea-Ygael N, Levy D, et al. (2007) A conflict rat model of cue-induced relapse to cocaine seeking. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 194:117–25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0827-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Corbett R, Hartman H, Kerman LL, et al. (1993) Effects of atypical antipsychotic agents on social behavior in rodents. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 45:9–17. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90079-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Cosgrove KP, Hunter RG, Carroll ME (2002) Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 73:663–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Cugusi L, Manca A, Bergamin M, et al. (2019) Aquatic exercise improves motor impairments in people with Parkinson’s disease, with similar or greater benefits than land-based exercise: a systematic review. J Physiother 65:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Cutter CJ, Schottenfeld RS, Moore BA, et al. (2014) A pilot trial of a videogame-based exercise program for methadone maintained patients. Journal of substance abuse treatment 47:299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Darna M, Beckmann JS, Gipson CD, et al. (2015) Effect of environmental enrichment on dopamine and serotonin transporters and glutamate neurotransmission in medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex. Brain Res 1599:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.12.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Day E, Copello A, Seddon JL, et al. (2018) A pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of an adjunct brief social network intervention in opiate substitution treatment services. BMC Psychiatry 18:8. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1600-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. De La Garza R, Yoon JH, Thompson-Lake DGY, et al. (2016) Treadmill exercise improves fitness and reduces craving and use of cocaine in individuals with concurrent cocaine and tobacco-use disorder. Psychiatry Res 245:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Dermody SS, Wardell JD, Stoner SA, Hendershot CS (2018) Predictors of Daily Adherence to Naltrexone for Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment During a Mobile Health Intervention. Ann Behav Med 52:787–797. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Di CP, Everitt BJ (2004) Direct interactions between the basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens core underlie cocaine-seeking behavior by rats. Journal of Neuroscience 24:7167–7173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Diniz DG, Foro CA, Rego CM, et al. (2010) Environmental impoverishment and aging alter object recognition, spatial learning, and dentate gyrus astrocytes. The European journal of neuroscience 32:509–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07296.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Dölen G, Darvishzadeh A, Huang KW, Malenka RC (2013) Social reward requires coordinated activity of accumbens oxytocin and 5HT. Nature 501:179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature12518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Duffy SN, Craddock KJ, Abel T, Nguyen PV (2001) Environmental Enrichment Modifies the PKA-Dependence of Hippocampal LTP and Improves Hippocampus-Dependent Memory. Learn Mem 8:26–34. doi: 10.1101/lm.36301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Eddie D, Hoffman L, Vilsaint C, et al. (2019) Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching. Front Psychol 10:. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Eisenstein SA, Holmes PV (2007) Chronic and voluntary exercise enhances learning of conditioned place preference to morphine in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:607–615. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. El Rawas R, Klement S, Salti A, et al. (2012) Preventive role of social interaction for cocaine conditioned place preference: correlation with FosB/DeltaFosB and pCREB expression in rat mesocorticolimbic areas. Front Behav Neurosci 6:8. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. El Rawas R, Thiriet N, Lardeux V, et al. (2009) Environmental enrichment decreases the rewarding but not the activating effects of heroin. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 203:561–70. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1402-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. El Rawas R, Thiriet N, Nader J, et al. (2011) Early exposure to environmental enrichment alters the expression of genes of the endocannabinoid system. Brain Research 1390:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Elibero A, Janse Van Rensburg K, Drobes DJ (2011) Acute effects of aerobic exercise and Hatha yoga on craving to smoke. Nicotine Tob Res 13:1140–1148. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Engelmann AJ, Aparicio MB, Kim A, et al. (2014) Chronic wheel running reduces maladaptive patterns of methamphetamine intake: regulation by attenuation of methamphetamine-induced neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Brain Struct Funct 219:657–672. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0525-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2005) Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nature Neuroscience 8:1481–1489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2013) From the ventral to the dorsal striatum: Devolving views of their roles in drug addiction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 37:1946–1954. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ewin SE, Kangiser MM, Stairs DJ (2015) The effects of environmental enrichment on nicotine condition place preference in male rats. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 23:387–394. doi: 10.1037/pha0000024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ewing S, Ranaldi R (2018) Environmental enrichment facilitates cocaine abstinence in an animal conflict model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 166:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Falkenberg T, Mohammed AK, Henriksson B, et al. (1992) Increased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in rat hippocampus is associated with improved spatial memory and enriched environment. Neurosci Lett 138:153–156. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90494-r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Famitafreshi H, Karimian M, Fatima S (2016) Synergistic Effects of Social Isolation and Morphine Addiction on Reduced Neurogenesis and BDNF Levels and the Resultant Deficits in Cognition and Emotional State in Male Rats. Curr Mol Pharmacol 9:337–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Feenstra MGP, Botterblom MHA (1996) Rapid sampling extracellular dopamine in the rat prefrontal cortex during food consumption, handling, and exposure to novelty. Brain Research 742:17–24. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)00945-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Felix-Ortiz AC, Tye KM (2014) Amygdala inputs to the ventral hippocampus bidirectionally modulate social behavior. J Neurosci 34:586–595. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4257-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Fiala BA, Joyce JN, Greenough WT (1978) Environmental complexity modulates growth of granule cell dendrites in developing but not adult hippocampus of rats. Exp Neurol 59:372–383. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90229-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Fischer FR, Peduzzi JD (2007) Functional recovery in rats with chronic spinal cord injuries after exposure to an enriched environment. J Spinal Cord Med 30:147–155. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Fish MT, Russoniello CV, O’Brien K (2014) The Efficacy of Prescribed Casual Videogame Play in Reducing Symptoms of Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Study. Games Health J 3:291–295. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2013.0092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Fong AJ, De Jesus S, Bray SR, Prapavessis H (2014) Effect of exercise on cigarette cravings and ad libitum smoking following concurrent stressors. Addict Behav 39:1516–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.05.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Foster TC, Gagne J, Massicotte G (1996) Mechanism of altered synaptic strength due to experience: relation to long-term potentiation. Brain research 736:243–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Freeman WM, Patel KM, Brucklacher RM, et al. (2008) Persistent alterations in mesolimbic gene expression with abstinence from cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1807–1817. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Frick KM, Stearns NA, Pan J-Y, Berger-Sweeney J (2003) Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Spatial Memory and Neurochemistry in Middle-Aged Mice. Learn Mem 10:187–198. doi: 10.1101/lm.50703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Fritz M, El Rawas R, Salti A, et al. (2011) Reversal of cocaine-conditioned place preference and mesocorticolimbic Zif268 expression by social interaction in rats. Addict Biol 16:273–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00285.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Galaj E, Manuszak M, Ranaldi R (2016) Environmental enrichment as a potential intervention for heroin seeking. Drug and alcohol dependence 163:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Galaj E, Shukur A, Manuszak M, et al. (2017) No evidence that environmental enrichment during rearing protects against cocaine behavioral effects but as an intervention reduces an already established cocaine conditioned place preference. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 156:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2017.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Galani R, Berthel M-C, Lazarus C, et al. (2007) The behavioral effects of enriched housing are not altered by serotonin depletion but enrichment alters hippocampal neurochemistry. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 88:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Gallego X, Cox RJ, Funk E, et al. (2015) Voluntary exercise decreases ethanol preference and consumption in C57BL/6 adolescent mice: sex differences and hippocampal BDNF expression. Physiol Behav 138:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Gardner EL (2005) Endocannabinoid signaling system and brain reward: emphasis on dopamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 81:263–284. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.01.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Gauthier JM, Lin A, Nic Dhonnchadha BA, et al. (2015) Environmental enrichment facilitates cocaine-cue extinction, deters reacquisition of cocaine self-administration and alters AMPAR GluA1 expression and phosphorylation. Addiction biology. doi: 10.1111/adb.12313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Gauthier JM, Lin A, Nic Dhonnchadha BÁ, et al. (2017) Environmental enrichment facilitates cocaine-cue extinction, deters reacquisition of cocaine self-administration and alters AMPAR GluA1 expression and phosphorylation. Addict Biol 22:152–162. doi: 10.1111/adb.12313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Georgakouli K, Manthou E, Georgoulias P, et al. (2017) Exercise training reduces alcohol consumption but does not affect HPA-axis activity in heavy drinkers. Physiol Behav 179:276–283. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Gerdeman GL, Partridge JG, Lupica CR, Lovinger DM (2003) It could be habit forming: drugs of abuse and striatal synaptic plasticity. Trends in Neurosciences 26:184–192. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00065-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Gipson CD, Beckmann JS, El-Maraghi S, et al. (2010) Effect of environmental enrichment on escalation of cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 557–66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2060-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND (2002) Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry 159:1642–652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Gómez D, Jason LA, Contreras R, et al. (2014) Vocational Training and Employment Attainment among Substance Abuse Recovering Individuals within a Communal Living Environment. Ther Communities 35:42–47. doi: 10.1108/TC-03-2014-0008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Gorzalka BB, Hill MN, Hillard CJ (2008) Regulation of endocannabinoid signaling by stress: Implications for stress-related affective disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 32:1152–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Green TA, Alibhai IN, Roybal CN, et al. (2010) Environmental enrichment produces a behavioral phenotype mediated by low cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding (CREB) activity in the nucleus accumbens. Biol Psychiatry 67:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Green TA, Cain ME, Thompson M, Bardo MT (2003) Environmental enrichment decreases nicotine-induced hyperactivity in rats. Psychopharmacology 170:235–41. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1538-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Green TA, Gehrke BJ, Bardo MT (2002) Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous amphetamine self-administration in rats: dose-response functions for fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules. Psychopharmacology 162:373–8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1134-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Greenough WT, Volkmar FR, Juraska JM (1973) Effects of rearing complexity on dendritic branching in frontolateral and temporal cortex of the rat. Experimental neurology 41:371–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Greenwood BN, Foley TE, Le TV, et al. (2011) Long-term voluntary wheel running is rewarding and produces plasticity in the mesolimbic reward pathway. Behavioural brain research 217:354–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Grimm JW, Hope BT, Wise RA, Shaham Y (2001) Neuroadaptation. Incubation of cocaine craving after withdrawal. Nature 412:141–2. doi: 10.1038/35084134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Grimm JW, Osincup D, Wells B, et al. (2008) Environmental enrichment attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of sucrose seeking in rats. Behav Pharmacol 19:777–85. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32831c3b18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Hall FS, Wilkinson LS, Humby T, et al. (1998) Isolation rearing in rats: pre- and postsynaptic changes in striatal dopaminergic systems. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 59:859–872. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00510-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Hall JM, Savage LM (2016) Exercise leads to the re-emergence of the cholinergic/nestin neuronal phenotype within the medial septum/diagonal band and subsequent rescue of both hippocampal ACh efflux and spatial behavior. Experimental neurology 278:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Hammer T, Ravndal E, Vaglum P (1985) Work is Not Enough: A Quasi-Experimental Study of a Vocational Training Programme for Young Drug and Alcohol Abusers. Journal of Drug Issues 15:393–403. doi: 10.1177/002204268501500308 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Han X, Li N, Xue X, et al. (2012) Early social isolation disrupts latent inhibition and increases dopamine D2 receptor expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens of adult rats. Brain Res 1447:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Havassy BE, Hall SM, Wasserman DA (1991) Social support and relapse: Commonalities among alcoholics, opiate users, and cigarette smokers. Addictive Behaviors 16:235–246. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(91)90016-B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Hebb DO (1947) The effects of early experience on problem-solving at maturity. American Psychologist 306–307 [Google Scholar]
  109. Higgins ST, Wong CJ, Badger GJ, et al. (2000) Contingent reinforcement increases cocaine abstinence during outpatient treatment and 1 year of follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:64–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Himmler BT, Pellis SM, Kolb B (2013) Juvenile play experience primes neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex to be more responsive to later experiences. Neurosci Lett 556:42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.09.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Hofford RS, Chow JJ, Beckmann JS, Bardo MT (2017) Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Self-Administration of the Short-Acting Opioid Remifentanil in Male Rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 234:3499–3506. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4734-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Hofford RS, Darna M, Wilmouth CE, et al. (2014) Environmental enrichment reduces methamphetamine cue-induced reinstatement but does not alter methamphetamine reward or VMAT2 function. Behavioural brain research 270:151–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Holloway RL Jr (1966) Dendritic branching: some preliminary results of training and complexity in rat visual cortex. Brain research 2:393–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Hooks MS, Kalivas PW (1995) The role of mesoaccumbens--pallidal circuitry in novelty-induced behavioral activation. Neuroscience 64:587–597. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00409-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Hosseiny S, Pietri M, Petit-Paitel A, et al. (2014) Differential neuronal plasticity in mouse hippocampus associated with various periods of enriched environment during postnatal development. Brain Struct Funct 3435–48. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0865-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Huang C-H, Yu Y-J, Chang C-H, Gean P-W (2016) Involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the inhibition of methamphetamine-associated contextual memory after prolonged extinction training. Journal of Neurochemistry 137:216–225. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF (2001) Neurotrophins: Roles in Neuronal Development and Function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:677–736. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Huang YH, Lin Y, Mu P, et al. (2009) In vivo cocaine experience generates silent synapses. Neuron 63:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Hunt WA, Barnett LW, Branch LG (1971) Relapse rates in addiction programs. J Clin Psychol 27:455–456. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ickes BR, Pham TM, Sanders LA, et al. (2000) Long-Term Environmental Enrichment Leads to Regional Increases in Neurotrophin Levels in Rat Brain. Experimental Neurology 164:45–52. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Ikemoto S, Panksepp J (1999) The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior:a unifying interpretations with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Research Reviews 31:6–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Imperio CG, McFalls AJ, Hadad N, et al. (2018) Exposure to environmental enrichment attenuates addiction-like behavior and alters molecular effects of heroin self-administration in rats. Neuropharmacology 139:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.06.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Jadavji NM, Kolb B, Metz GA (2006) Enriched environment improves motor function in intact and unilateral dopamine-depleted rats. Neuroscience 140:1127–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Jannetto PJ, Helander A, Garg U, et al. (2019) The Fentanyl Epidemic and Evolution of Fentanyl Analogs in the United States and the European Union. Clin Chem 65:242–253. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.281626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Janse Van Rensburg K, Taylor A, Hodgson T, Benattayallah A (2009) Acute exercise modulates cigarette cravings and brain activation in response to smoking-related images: an fMRI study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 203:589–598. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1405-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Jensen K, Nielsen C, Ekstrøm CT, Roessler KK (2019) Physical exercise in the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) patients affects their drinking habits: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Public Health 47:462–468. doi: 10.1177/1403494818759842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Jentsch JD, Taylor JR (1999) Impulsitivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse:implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 146:373–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Jones BC, Hou X, Cook MN (1996) Effect of exposure to novelty on brain monoamines in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice. Physiol Behav 59:361–367. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02010-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Kagaya T, Yonaga M, Furuya Y, et al. (1996) Dopamine D3 agonists disrupt social behavior in rats. Brain Res 721:229–232. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00288-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Kalivas PW, Volkow N, Seamans J (2005) Unmanageable motivation in addiction: a pathology in prefrontal-accumbens glutamate transmission. Neuron 45:647–650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Karkhanis AN, Alexander NJ, McCool BA, et al. (2015) Chronic social isolation during adolescence augments catecholamine response to acute ethanol in the basolateral amygdala. Synapse 69:385–395. doi: 10.1002/syn.21826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Karkhanis AN, Leach AC, Yorgason JT, et al. (2019) Chronic Social Isolation Stress during Peri-Adolescence Alters Presynaptic Dopamine Terminal Dynamics via Augmentation in Accumbal Dopamine Availability. ACS Chem Neurosci 10:2033–2044. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Kaskutas LA, Bond J, Humphreys K (2002) Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction 97:891–900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH (1997) More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature 386:493–5. doi: 10.1038/386493a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH (1998) Experience-induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus. The Journal of neuroscience 18:3206–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Kirkpatrick K, Marshall AT, Clarke J, Cain ME (2013) Environmental Rearing Effects on Impulsivity and Reward Sensitivity. Behav Neurosci 127:712–724. doi: 10.1037/a0034124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Kleber HD (2007) Pharmacologic treatments for opioid dependence: detoxification and maintenance options. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 9:455–470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Knight RT, Grabowecky M (1995) Escape from linear time: Prefrontal cortex and conscious experience In: The cognitive neurosciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US, pp 1357–1371 [Google Scholar]
  139. Koffarnus MN, Wong CJ, Diemer K, et al. (2011) A randomized clinical trial of a Therapeutic Workplace for chronically unemployed, homeless, alcohol-dependent adults. Alcohol Alcohol 46:561–569. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Kolb B, Gibb R (1991) Environmental enrichment and cortical injury: behavioral and anatomical consequences of frontal cortex lesions. Cereb Cortex 1:189–198. doi: 10.1093/cercor/1.2.189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kolb B, Gibb R, Gorny G (2003a) Experience-dependent changes in dendritic arbor and spine density in neocortex vary qualitatively with age and sex. Neurobiology of learning and memory 79:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Kolb B, Gorny G, Söderpalm AHV, Robinson TE (2003b) Environmental complexity has different effects on the structure of neurons in the prefrontal cortex versus the parietal cortex or nucleus accumbens. Synapse 48:149–153. doi: 10.1002/syn.10196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Koob GF, Le Moal M (1997) Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 278:52–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Koya E, Uejima JL, Wihbey KA, et al. (2009) Role of ventral medial prefrontal cortex in incubation of cocaine craving. Neuropharmacology 56 Suppl 1:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Krech D, Rosenzweig MR, Bennett EL (1960) Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 53:509–519. doi: 10.1037/h0045402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Kummer KK, Hofhansel L, Barwitz CM, et al. (2014) Differences in social interaction- vs. cocaine reward in mouse vs. rat. Front Behav Neurosci 8:363. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Kurti AN, Dallery J (2014) Effects of exercise on craving and cigarette smoking in the human laboratory. Addict Behav 39:1131–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Lee AM, Messing RO (2008) Protein kinases and addiction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1141:22–57. doi: 10.1196/annals.1441.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Lee H-K, Takamiya K, Han J-S, et al. (2003) Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit is required for synaptic plasticity and retention of spatial memory. Cell 112:631–643. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00122-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Legault M, Wise RA (1999) Injections of N-methyl-D-aspartate into the ventral hippocampus increase extracellular dopamine in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens. Synapse 31:241–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Lespine L-F, Tirelli E (2019) No evidence that wheel-running exercise impacts cocaine conditioned place preference in male C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res 365:110–113. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Levine AA, Guan Z, Barco A, et al. (2005) CREB-binding protein controls response to cocaine by acetylating histones at the fosB promoter in the mouse striatum. PNAS 102:19186–19191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509735102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Li C, Frantz KJ (2017) Abstinence environment contributes to age differences in reinstatement of cocaine seeking between adolescent and adult male rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 158:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2017.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Li X, Meng L, Huang K, et al. (2015a) Environmental enrichment blocks reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice. Neuroscience letters 599:92–6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Li X, Zeric T, Kambhampati S, et al. (2015b) The central amygdala nucleus is critical for incubation of methamphetamine craving. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1297–1306. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Liang F, Yang S, Zhang Y, Hao T (2019) Social housing promotes cognitive function through enhancing synaptic plasticity in APP/PS1 mice. Behav Brain Res 368:111910. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Lichti CF, Fan X, English RD, et al. (2014) Environmental enrichment alters protein expression as well as the proteomic response to cocaine in rat nucleus accumbens. Front Behav Neurosci 8:246. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Lisman J, Schulman H, Cline H (2002) The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3:175–190. doi: 10.1038/nrn753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Lookatch SJ, Wimberly AS, McKay JR (2019) Effects of Social Support and 12-Step Involvement on Recovery among People in Continuing Care for Cocaine Dependence. Subst Use Misuse 1–12. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1638406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Lu L, Koya E, Zhai H, et al. (2006) Role of ERK in cocaine addiction. Trends in Neurosciences 29:695–703. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Lu X, Zhao C, Zhang L, et al. (2012) The effects of rearing condition on methamphetamine self-administration and cue-induced drug seeking. Drug and alcohol dependence 124:288–98. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Lynch WJ, Piehl KB, Acosta G, et al. (2010) Aerobic exercise attenuates reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior and associated neuroadaptations in the prefrontal cortex. Biological psychiatry 68:774–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Lynch WJ, Robinson AM, Abel J, Smith MA (2017) Exercise as a Prevention for Substance Use Disorder: A Review of Sex Differences and Neurobiological Mechanisms. Curr Addict Rep 4:455–466. doi: 10.1007/s40429-017-0178-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Lynch WJ, Tan L, Narmeen S, et al. (2019) Exercise or saccharin during abstinence block estrus-induced increases in nicotine-seeking. Physiol Behav 203:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.10.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Ma Y-Y, Lee BR, Wang X, et al. (2014) Bidirectional modulation of incubation of cocaine craving by silent synapse-based remodeling of prefrontal cortex to accumbens projections. Neuron 83:1453–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Ma Y-Y, Wang X, Huang Y, et al. (2016) Re-silencing of silent synapses unmasks anti-relapse effects of environmental enrichment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:5089–5094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524739113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Malinow R, Malenka RC (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:103–126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Malinow R, Schulman H, Tsien RW (1989) Inhibition of postsynaptic PKC or CaMKII blocks induction but not expression of LTP. Science 245:862–866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Man H-Y, Sekine-Aizawa Y, Huganir RL (2007) Regulation of {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor trafficking through PKA phosphorylation of the Glu receptor 1 subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3579–3584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611698104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Mandyam CD, Koob GF (2012) The addicted brain craves new neurons: putative role for adult-born progenitors in promoting recovery. Trends Neurosci 35:250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. McCabe SE, West BT, Strobbe S, Boyd CJ (2018) Persistence/recurrence of and remission from DSM-5 substance use disorders in the United States: Substance-specific and substance-aggregated correlates. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 93:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. McDonald AJ (1996) Localization of AMPA glutamate receptor subunits in subpopulations of non-pyramidal neurons in the rat basolateral amygdala. Neurosci Lett 208:175–178. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12585-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Meffert MK, Parfitt KD, Doze VA, et al. (1991) Protein Kinases and Long-Term Potentiation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 627:2–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb25909.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Melendez RI, Gregory ML, Bardo MT, Kalivas PW (2004) Impoverished rearing environment alters metabotropic glutamate receptor expression and function in the prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1980–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Milby JB, Conti K, Wallace D, et al. (2015) Comorbidity effects on cocaine dependence treatment and examination of reciprocal relationships between abstinence and depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 83:45–55. doi: 10.1037/a0037960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Milby JB, Schumacher JE, McNamara C, et al. (2000) Initiating abstinence in cocaine abusing dually diagnosed homeless persons. Drug Alcohol Depend 60:55–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Milby JB, Schumacher JE, Raczynski JM, et al. (1996) Sufficient conditions for effective treatment of substance abusing homeless persons. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 43:39–47. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(96)01286-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Miller ML, Vaillancourt BD, Wright MJ, et al. (2012) Reciprocal inhibitory effects of intravenous dmethamphetamine self-administration and wheel activity in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 121:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Mlynarik M, Johansson BB, Jezova D (2004) Enriched Environment Influences Adrenocortical Response to Immune Challenge and Glutamate Receptor Gene Expression in Rat Hippocampus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1018:273–280. doi: 10.1196/annals.1296.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Morres ID, Hatzigeorgiadis A, Stathi A, et al. (2019) Aerobic exercise for adult patients with major depressive disorder in mental health services: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 36:39–53. doi: 10.1002/da.22842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Mucha RF, van der Kooy D, O’Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P (1982) Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Research 243:91–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Mustroph ML, Pinardo H, Merritt JR, Rhodes JS (2016) Parameters for abolishing conditioned place preference for cocaine from running and environmental enrichment in male C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res 312:366–373. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Mustroph ML, Stobaugh DJ, Miller DS, et al. (2011) Wheel running can accelerate or delay extinction of conditioned place preference for cocaine in male C57BL/6J mice, depending on timing of wheel access. The European journal of neuroscience 34:1161–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07828.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Nader J, Chauvet C, Rawas RE, et al. (2012) Loss of environmental enrichment increases vulnerability to cocaine addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 37:1579–87. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Naka F, Narita N, Okado N, Narita M (2005) Modification of AMPA receptor properties following environmental enrichment. Brain & development 27:275–8. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2004.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Neeper SA, Gómez-Pinilla F, Choi J, Cotman CW (1996) Physical activity increases mRNA for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor in rat brain. Brain Res 726:49–56 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. NIDA (2016) National Institute on Drug Abuse. Trends and Statistics [Google Scholar]
  188. Nielsen S, Larance B, Degenhardt L, et al. (2016) Opioid agonist treatment for pharmaceutical opioid dependent people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011117.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. O’Brien C, Childress AR, Ehrman R, et al. (1992) Conditioning mechanisms in drug dependence. Clin Neuropharmacol 15 Suppl 1 Pt A:66A–67A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. O’Connell MJ, Flanagan EH, Delphin-Rittmon ME, Davidson L (2017) Enhancing outcomes for persons with co-occurring disorders through skills training and peer recovery support. J Ment Health 1–6. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1294733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Ogbonmwan YE, Schroeder JP, Holmes PV, Weinshenker D (2015) The effects of post-extinction exercise on cocaine-primed and stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232:1395–1403. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3778-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Ortiz J, Harris HW, Guitart X, et al. (1995) Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERKs) and ERK kinase (MEK) in brain: regional distribution and regulation by chronic morphine. J Neurosci 15:1285–1297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Pang MYC, Charlesworth SA, Lau RWK, Chung RCK (2013) Using aerobic exercise to improve health outcomes and quality of life in stroke: evidence-based exercise prescription recommendations. Cerebrovasc Dis 35:7–22. doi: 10.1159/000346075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Pang TYC, Du X, Zajac MS, et al. (2009) Altered serotonin receptor expression is associated with depression-related behavior in the R6/1 transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 18:753–766. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Patten CA, Bronars CA, Vickers Douglas KS, et al. (2017) Supervised, Vigorous Intensity Exercise Intervention for Depressed Female Smokers: A Pilot Study. Nicotine Tob Res 19:77–86. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Peck JA, Galaj E, Eshak S, et al. (2015) Environmental enrichment induces early heroin abstinence in an animal conflict model. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 138:20–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Peck JA, Ranaldi R (2014) Drug abstinence: Exploring animal models and behavioral treatment strategies. Psychopharmacology [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Perry JL, Stairs DJ, Bardo MT (2008) Impulsive choice and environmental enrichment: Effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate. Behav Brain Res 193:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Peterson AB, Abel JM, Lynch WJ (2014a) Dose-dependent effects of wheel running on cocaine-seeking and prefrontal cortex Bdnf exon IV expression in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231:1305–1314. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3321-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Peterson AB, Hivick DP, Lynch WJ (2014b) Dose-dependent effectiveness of wheel running to attenuate cocaine-seeking: impact of sex and estrous cycle in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231:2661–2670. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3437-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Marx J, et al. (2005) Vouchers versus prizes: contingency management treatment of substance abusers in community settings. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 73:1005–14. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Pham TM, Ickes B, Albeck D, et al. (1999) Changes in brain nerve growth factor levels and nerve growth factor receptors in rats exposed to environmental enrichment for one year. Neuroscience 94:279–286. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00316-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Pinaud R, Penner MR, Robertson HA, Currie RW (2001) Upregulation of the immediate early gene arc in the brains of rats exposed to environmental enrichment: implications for molecular plasticity. Molecular Brain Research 91:50–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Platt JJ (1995) Vocational rehabilitation of drug abusers. Psychol Bull 117:416–433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Prado Lima MG, Schimidt HL, Garcia A, et al. (2018) Environmental enrichment and exercise are better than social enrichment to reduce memory deficits in amyloid beta neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E2403–E2409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718435115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Prapavessis H, De Jesus S, Fitzgeorge L, et al. (2016) Exercise to Enhance Smoking Cessation: the Getting Physical on Cigarette Randomized Control Trial. Ann Behav Med 50:358–369. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9761-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Prapavessis H, De Jesus S, Harper T, et al. (2014) The effects of acute exercise on tobacco cravings and withdrawal symptoms in temporary abstinent pregnant smokers. Addict Behav 39:703–708. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Puhl MD, Blum JS, Acosta-Torres S, Grigson PS (2012) Environmental enrichment protects against the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in adult male rats, but does not eliminate avoidance of a drug-associated saccharin cue. Behav Pharmacol 23:43–53. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32834eb060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Ranaldi R, Kest K, Zellner M, Hachimine-Semprebom P (2011) Environmental enrichment, administered after establishment of cocaine self-administration, reduces lever pressing in extinction and during a cocaine context renewal test. Behavioural pharmacology 22:347–53. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283487365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Rasmuson S, Olsson T, Henriksson BG, et al. (1998) Environmental enrichment selectively increases 5-HT1A receptor mRNA expression and binding in the rat hippocampus. Molecular Brain Research 53:285–290. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00317-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Rawson RA, Chudzynski J, Mooney L, et al. (2015) Impact of an exercise intervention on methamphetamine use outcomes post-residential treatment care. Drug Alcohol Depend 156:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Rawson RA, Huber A, McCann M, et al. (2002) A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:817–824. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Rebec GV, Christensen JR, Guerra C, Bardo MT (1997a) Regional and temporal differences in real-time dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens during free-choice novelty. Brain Res 776:61–67. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01004-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Rebec GV, Grabner CP, Johnson M, et al. (1997b) Transient increases in catecholaminergic activity in medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens shell during novelty. Neuroscience 76:707–714. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00382-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Recinto P, Samant ARH, Chavez G, et al. (2012) Levels of neural progenitors in the hippocampus predict memory impairment and relapse to drug seeking as a function of excessive methamphetamine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:1275–1287. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Robinson TE, Kolb B (2004) Structural plasticity associated with exposure to drugs of abuse. Neuropharmacology 47 Suppl 1:33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.06.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Robison LS, Alessi L, Thanos PK (2018a) Chronic forced exercise inhibits stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine conditioned place preference. Behav Brain Res 353:176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Robison LS, Swenson S, Hamilton J, Thanos PK (2018b) Exercise Reduces Dopamine D1R and Increases D2R in Rats: Implications for Addiction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 50:1596–1602. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Roozen HG, Boulogne JJ, van Tulder MW, et al. (2004) A systematic review of the effectiveness of the community reinforcement approach in alcohol, cocaine and opioid addiction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 74:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Rosenzweig MR (1966) Environmental complexity, cerebral change, and behavior. American Psychologist 21:321–332. doi: 10.1037/h0023555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Rosenzweig MR, Bennett EL (1996) Psychobiology of plasticity: effects of training and experience on brain and behavior. Behavioural brain research 78:57–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM (2016) Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths - United States, 2000–2014. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 64:1378–1382. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Sager T, Kashon ML, Krajnak K (2018) Estrogen and Environmental Enrichment Differentially Affect Neurogenesis, Dendritic Spine Immunolabeling and Synaptogenesis in the Hippocampus of Young and Reproductively Senescent Female Rats. Neuroendocrinology 106:252–263. doi: 10.1159/000479699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Salti A, Kummer KK, Sadangi C, et al. (2015) Social interaction reward decreases p38 activation in the nucleus accumbens shell of rats. Neuropharmacology 99:510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.08.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Sampedro-Piquero P, Castilla-Ortega E, Zancada-Menendez C, et al. (2016) Environmental enrichment as a therapeutic avenue for anxiety in aged Wistar rats: Effect on cat odor exposition and GABAergic interneurons. Neuroscience 330:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Sampedro-Piquero P, Zancada-Menendez C, Begega A (2015) Housing condition-related changes involved in reversal learning and its c-Fos associated activity in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 307:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.08.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Sanchez V, Moore CF, Brunzell DH, Lynch WJ (2013) Effect of wheel-running during abstinence on subsequent nicotine-seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology 227:403–11. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2964-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Sanchez V, Moore CF, Brunzell DH, Lynch WJ (2014) Sex differences in the effect of wheel running on subsequent nicotine-seeking in a rat adolescent-onset self-administration model. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231:1753–1762. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3359-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Schenk S, Hunt T, Malovechko R, et al. (1986) Differential effects of isolation housing on the conditioned place preference produced by cocaine and amphetamine. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 24:1793–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Schenk S, Robinson B, Amit Z (1988) Housing conditions fail to affect the intravenous self-administration of amphetamine. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 31:59–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Schulman H (1995) Protein phosphorylation in neuronal plasticity and gene expression. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 5:375–381. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80051-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Segovia G, Yagüe AG, García-Verdugo JM, Mora F (2006) Environmental enrichment promotes neurogenesis and changes the extracellular concentrations of glutamate and GABA in the hippocampus of aged rats. Brain Research Bulletin 70:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Shaham Y, Miczek KA (2003) Reinstatement: toward a model of relapse. Psychopharmacology 168:1–2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Shalev U, Morales M, Hope B, et al. (2001) Time-dependent changes in extinction behavior and stress-induced reinstatement of drug seeking following withdrawal from heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology 156:98–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Shen H, Tong L, Balazs R, Cotman CW (2001) Physical activity elicits sustained activation of the cyclic AMP response element-binding protein and mitogen-activated protein kinase in the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 107:219–229. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00315-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Shepard JD, Bossert JM, Liu SY, Shaham Y (2004) The anxiogenic drug yohimbine reinstates methamphetamine seeking in a rat model of drug relapse. Biol Psychiatry 55:1082–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Sikora M, Nicolas C, Istin M, et al. (2018) Generalization of effects of environmental enrichment on seeking for different classes of drugs of abuse. Behavioural Brain Research 341:109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Silverman K, Wong CJ, Higgins ST, et al. (1996) Increasing opiate abstinence through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Drug and alcohol dependence 41:157–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Smith MA, Chisholm KA, Bryant PA, et al. (2005) Social and environmental influences on opioid sensitivity in rats: importance of an opioid’s relative efficacy at the mu-receptor. Psychopharmacology 181:27–37. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2218-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Smith MA, Pitts EG (2012) Wheel running decreases the positive reinforcing effects of heroin. Pharmacological reports : PR 64:960–4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Smith MA, Schmidt KT, Iordanou JC, Mustroph ML (2008) Aerobic exercise decreases the positive-reinforcing effects of cocaine. Drug Alcohol Depend 98:129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Smith MA, Walker KL, Cole KT, Lang KC (2011) The Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Cocaine Self-Administration in Male and Female Rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 218:357–369. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2321-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Sobieraj JC, Kim A, Fannon MJ, Mandyam CD (2016) Chronic wheel running-induced reduction of extinction and reinstatement of methamphetamine seeking in methamphetamine dependent rats is associated with reduced number of periaqueductal gray dopamine neurons. Brain Struct Funct 221:261–76. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0905-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Solinas M, Chauvet C, Thiriet N, et al. (2008) Reversal of cocaine addiction by environmental enrichment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17145–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806889105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Solinas M, Thiriet N, Chauvet C, Jaber M (2010) Prevention and treatment of drug addiction by environmental enrichment. Progress in Neurobiology 92:572–592. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Solinas M, Thiriet N, El Rawas R, et al. (2009) Environmental enrichment during early stages of life reduces the behavioral, neurochemical, and molecular effects of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1102–11. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Solinas M, Yasar S, Goldberg SR (2007) Endocannabinoid system involvement in brain reward processes related to drug abuse. Pharmacol Res 56:393–405. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Spires TL, Grote HE, Varshney NK, et al. (2004) Environmental enrichment rescues protein deficits in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease, indicating a possible disease mechanism. Journal of Neuroscience 24:2270–2276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Stairs DJ, Bardo MT (2009) Neurobehavioral effects of environmental enrichment and drug abuse vulnerability. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:377–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Stefanik MT, Kalivas PW (2013) Optogenetic dissection of basolateral amygdala projections during cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Front Behav Neurosci 7:. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE, Liebson I (1980) Reducing drug use among methadone maintenance clients: contingent reinforcement for morphine-free urines. Addictive behaviors 5:333–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Stotts AL, Dodrill CL, Kosten TR (2009) Opioid Dependence Treatment: Options In Pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10:1727–1740. doi: 10.1517/14656560903037168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Stuber GD, Sparta DR, Stamatakis AM, et al. (2011) Excitatory transmission from the amygdala to nucleus accumbens facilitates reward seeking. Nature 475:377–380. doi: 10.1038/nature10194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Taylor AH, Ussher MH, Faulkner G (2007) The acute effects of exercise on cigarette cravings, withdrawal symptoms, affect and smoking behaviour: a systematic review. Addiction 102:534–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01739.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Thanos PK, Stamos J, Robison LS, et al. (2013) Daily treadmill exercise attenuates cocaine cue-induced reinstatement and cocaine induced locomotor response but increases cocaine-primed reinstatement. Behav Brain Res 239:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Thiel KJ, Painter MR, Pentkowski NS, et al. (2012) Environmental enrichment counters cocaine abstinence-induced stress and brain reactivity to cocaine cues but fails to prevent the incubation effect. Addiction biology 17:365–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00358.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Thiel KJ, Pentkowski NS, Peartree NA, et al. (2010) Environmental living conditions introduced during forced abstinence alter cocaine-seeking behavior and Fos protein expression. Neuroscience. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Thiel KJ, Sanabria F, Pentkowski NS, Neisewander JL (2009) Anti-craving effects of environmental enrichment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 12:1151–6. doi: 10.1017/S1461145709990472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Thiriet N, Amar L, Toussay X, et al. (2008) Environmental enrichment during adolescence regulates gene expression in the striatum of mice. Brain Res 1222:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Tian Y-H, Lee S-Y, Kim H-C, Jang C-G (2010) Repeated methamphetamine treatment increases expression of TRPV1 mRNA in the frontal cortex but not in the striatum or hippocampus of mice. Neurosci Lett 472:61–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Timko C, DeBenedetti A (2007) A randomized controlled trial of intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups: one-year outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 90:270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Timko C, Debenedetti A, Billow R (2006) Intensive referral to 12-Step self-help groups and 6-month substance use disorder outcomes. Addiction 101:678–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01391.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Troisi JRI (2013) Perhaps more consideration of Pavlovian-operant interaction may improve the clinical efficacy of behaviorally based drug treatment programs. Psychological Record 63:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Turnock-Jones JJ, Jennings CA, Robbins MJ, et al. (2009) Increased expression of the NR2A NMDA receptor subunit in the prefrontal cortex of rats reared in isolation. Synapse 63:836–846. doi: 10.1002/syn.20665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Tzschentke TM (1998) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Progress in Neurobiology 56:613–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Tzschentke TM (2007) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addiction biology 12:227–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00070.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. van Praag H, Shubert T, Zhao C, Gage FH (2005) Exercise enhances learning and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 25:8680–5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Vanderschuren LJ, Stein EA, Wiegant VM, Van Ree JM (1995) Social play alters regional brain opioid receptor binding in juvenile rats. Brain Res 680:148–156. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00256-p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Vaynman S, Ying Z, Gomez-Pinilla F (2003) Interplay between brain-derived neurotrophic factor and signal transduction modulators in the regulation of the effects of exercise on synaptic-plasticity. Neuroscience 122:647–657. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Venniro M, Zhang M, Caprioli D, et al. (2018) Volitional social interaction prevents drug addiction in rat models. Nat Neurosci 21:1520–1529. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0246-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Viola GG, Rodrigues L, Americo JC, et al. (2009) Morphological changes in hippocampal astrocytes induced by environmental enrichment in mice. Brain research 1274:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Volkow ND, Jones EB, Einstein EB, Wargo EM (2019) Prevention and Treatment of Opioid Misuse and Addiction: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry 76:208–216. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Walsh RN, Budtz‐Olsen OE, Penny JE, Cummins RA (1969) The effects of environmental complexity on the histology of the rat hippocampus. Journal of Comparative Neurology 137:361–365. doi: 10.1002/cne.901370309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Wang D, Zhou C, Chang Y-K (2015) Acute exercise ameliorates craving and inhibitory deficits in methamphetamine: An ERP study. Physiol Behav 147:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Wang MZ, Marshall AT, Kirkpatrick K (2017) Differential effects of social and novelty enrichment on individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility. Behav Brain Res 327:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Wang Y-C, Ho U-C, Ko M-C, et al. (2012) Differential neuronal changes in medial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens after postweaning social isolation. Brain Struct Funct 217:337–351. doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0355-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. White WL (2012) Recovery/ remission from substance use disorders: An analysis of reported outcomes in 415 scientific reports, 1868–2011. Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual Disability Services, Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
  278. Will B, Galani R, Kelche C, Rosenzweig MR (2004) Recovery from brain injury in animals: relative efficacy of environmental enrichment, physical exercise or formal training (1990–2002). Progress in Neurobiology 72:167–182. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Williams BM, Luo Y, Ward C, et al. (2001) Environmental enrichment: Effects on spatial memory and hippocampal CREB immunoreactivity. Physiology & Behavior 73:649–658. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00543-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Whiteley JA, et al. (2011) Acute effects of moderate intensity aerobic exercise on affective withdrawal symptoms and cravings among women smokers. Addict Behav 36:894–897. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Willuhn I, Tose A, Wanat MJ, et al. (2014) Phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens in response to pro-social 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats. J Neurosci 34:10616–10623. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1060-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Wise RA, Koob GF (2014) The development and maintenance of drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 39:254–62. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Wittmann BC, Bunzeck N, Dolan RJ, Düzel E (2007) Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection. Neuroimage 38:194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Wood DA, Buse JE, Wellman CL, Rebec GV (2005) Differential environmental exposure alters NMDA but not AMPA receptor subunit expression in nucleus accumbens core and shell. Brain Res 1042:176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.02.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Wu M, Brudzynski SM (1995) Mesolimbic dopamine terminals and locomotor activity induced from the subiculum. Neuroreport 6:1601–1604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Xi Z-X, Peng X-Q, Li X, et al. (2011) Brain cannabinoid CB2 receptors modulate cocaine’s actions in mice. Nat Neurosci 14:1160–1166. doi: 10.1038/nn.2874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Xu Z, Hou B, Gao Y, et al. (2007) Effects of enriched environment on morphine-induced reward in mice. Experimental neurology 204:714–9. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Yates JR, Beckmann JS, Meyer AC, Bardo MT (2013) Concurrent choice for social interaction and amphetamine using conditioned place preference in rats: effects of age and housing condition. Drug Alcohol Depend 129:240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ, Balleine BW (2004) Lesions of dorsolateral striatum preserve outcome expectancy but disrupt habit formation in instrumental learning. European Journal of Neuroscience 19:181–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Zajac MS, Pang TYC, Wong N, et al. (2010) Wheel running and environmental enrichment differentially modify exon-specific BDNF expression in the hippocampus of wild-type and pre-motor symptomatic male and female Huntington’s disease mice. Hippocampus 20:621–636. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Zakharova E, Miller J, Unterwald E, et al. (2009) Social and physical environment alter cocaine conditioned place preference and dopaminergic markers in adolescent male rats. Neuroscience 163:890–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Zeleznikow-Johnston A, Burrows EL, Renoir T, Hannan AJ (2017) Environmental enrichment enhances cognitive flexibility in C57BL/6 mice on a touchscreen reversal learning task. Neuropharmacology 117:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Zernig G, Kummer KK, Prast JM (2013) Dyadic Social Interaction as an Alternative Reward to Cocaine. Front Psychiatry 4:. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Zernig G, Pinheiro BS (2015) Dyadic social interaction inhibits cocaine-conditioned place preference and the associated activation of the accumbens corridor. Behav Pharmacol 26:580–594. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Zhang XQ, Mu JW, Wang HB, et al. (2016a) Increased protein expression levels of pCREB, BDNF and SDF-1/CXCR4 in the hippocampus may be associated with enhanced neurogenesis induced by environmental enrichment. Mol Med Rep 14:2231–2237. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Zhang X-Q, Yu Z-P, Ling Y, et al. (2019) Enduring effects of juvenile social isolation on physiological properties of medium spiny neurons in nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05284-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Zhang Y, Crofton EJ, Fan X, et al. (2016b) Convergent transcriptomics and proteomics of environmental enrichment and cocaine identifies novel therapeutic strategies for addiction. Neuroscience 339:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Zhang Y, Crofton EJ, Li D, et al. (2014) Overexpression of DeltaFosB in nucleus accumbens mimics the protective addiction phenotype, but not the protective depression phenotype of environmental enrichment. Front Behav Neurosci 8:297. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Zhou Y, Li C, Li R, Zhou C (2018) Exercise improves nicotine reward-associated cognitive behaviors and related α7 nAChR-mediated signal transduction in adolescent rats. J Cell Physiol 233:5756–5767. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Zhu J, Apparsundaram S, Bardo MT, Dwoskin LP (2005) Environmental enrichment decreases cell surface expression of the dopamine transporter in rat medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurochemistry 93:1434–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Zhu J, Bardo MT, Dwoskin LP (2013) Distinct effects of enriched environment on dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens shell and core following systemic nicotine administration. Synapse 67:57–67. doi: 10.1002/syn.21615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Zhu J, Green T, Bardo MT, Dwoskin LP (2004) Environmental enrichment enhances sensitization to GBR 12935-induced activity and decreases dopamine transporter function in the medial prefrontal cortex. Behavioural Brain Research 148:107–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Zlebnik NE, Anker JJ, Carroll ME (2012) Exercise to reduce the escalation of cocaine self-administration in adolescent and adult rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 224:387–400. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2760-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Zlebnik NE, Anker JJ, Gliddon LA, Carroll ME (2010) Reduction of extinction and reinstatement of cocaine seeking by wheel running in female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 209:113–125. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1776-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Zlebnik NE, Carroll ME (2015) Prevention of the incubation of cocaine seeking by aerobic exercise in female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232:3507–3513. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3999-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Zlebnik NE, Hedges VL, Carroll ME, Meisel RL (2014) Chronic wheel running affects cocaine-induced c-Fos expression in brain reward areas in rats. Behav Brain Res 261:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES