Generating ring-shaped engineered heart tissues from ventricular and atrial human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Idit Goldfracht; Stephanie Protze; Assad Shiti; Noga Setter; Amit Gruber; Naim Shaheen; Yulia Nartiss; Gordon Keller; Lior Gepstein

doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13868-x

. 2020 Jan 7;11:75. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13868-x

Generating ring-shaped engineered heart tissues from ventricular and atrial human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Idit Goldfracht ¹, Stephanie Protze ^2,³, Assad Shiti ¹, Noga Setter ¹, Amit Gruber ¹, Naim Shaheen ¹, Yulia Nartiss ², Gordon Keller ^2,^4,⁵, Lior Gepstein ^1,^6,^✉

PMCID: PMC6946709 PMID: 31911598

Abstract

The functions of the heart are achieved through coordination of different cardiac cell subtypes (e.g., ventricular, atrial, conduction-tissue cardiomyocytes). Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) offer unique opportunities for cardiac research. Traditional studies using these cells focused on single-cells and utilized mixed cell populations. Our goal was to develop clinically-relevant engineered heart tissues (EHTs) comprised of chamber-specific hPSC-CMs. Here we show that such EHTs can be generated by directing hPSCs to differentiate into ventricular or atrial cardiomyocytes, and then embedding these cardiomyocytes in a collagen-hydrogel to create chamber-specific, ring-shaped, EHTs. The chamber-specific EHTs display distinct atrial versus ventricular phenotypes as revealed by immunostaining, gene-expression, optical assessment of action-potentials and conduction velocity, pharmacology, and mechanical force measurements. We also establish an atrial EHT-based arrhythmia model and confirm its usefulness by applying relevant pharmacological interventions. Thus, our chamber-specific EHT models can be used for cardiac disease modeling, pathophysiological studies and drug testing.

Subject terms: Stem-cell biotechnology, Tissue engineering, Cardiovascular diseases, Pluripotent stem cells

The cellular composition of previous engineered heart tissue is often heterogeneous. Here, the authors create chamber-specific human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes to form both ventricular and atrial cells before embedding in collagen-based matrix to form ring-shaped engineered heart tissue.

Introduction

The main functions of the heart are achieved by the coordinated activity of different cell types, such as ventricular, atrial, or conduction-system cardiomyocytes¹ as well as non-myocytes. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) offer several opportunities for cardiovascular regenerative medicine^2–7, for studying human heart development^8–10, for modeling acquired^11,12 and inherited^13–16 cardiac disorders, and for studying the effects of drugs and other therapeutic interventions^16,17. Most of these studies, however, focused on the single-cell level and utilized hPSC-CMs populations consisting of a mixture of different cardiomyocyte subtypes, such as ventricular-, atrial-, and nodal-like cells^13,15,18,19. This cellular heterogeneity may significantly hamper the use of hPSC-CMs for many of the aforementioned applications. To address this challenge, significant efforts have been made recently to establish development biology-guided hPSC differentiation protocols and/or selection strategies in an attempt to generate purified populations of chamber-specific cardiomyocytes^8,10,20–23.

Cardiac tissue engineering is an emerging biomedicine discipline attempting to combine scaffolding polymers with cells to create cardiac muscle like tissue-constructs^24,25. Previous studies with engineered heart tissues (EHT) composed of hPSC-CMs demonstrated that they resemble the native heart^26–28 and can be used for studying basic features of myocardial tissue biology^27–29, developing in-vitro models of acquired^29,30 and inherited^31–33 cardiac disorders, drug screening^32–36, and for myocardial tissue-replacement therapies^37–39. Although these tissue models proved useful for the aforementioned applications, they have also been hampered by the heterogeneity of their cellular composition. Consequentially, one of the important challenges in the field of hPSC-based cardiac tissue engineering is deriving chamber-specific myocardial tissues comprised purified populations of specific hPSC-CM subtypes.

Here, we aim to address this challenge and to develop methods for deriving hPSC-based ventricular and atrial engineered tissues, to characterize their phenotypic properties, and to evaluate the impact of such tissue models for downstream applications. Using a development biology-guided differentiation approach⁸, we generate purified populations of either ventricular- or atrial-like cells. The hPSC-CM subtypes are then combined with collagen to create chamber-specific EHTs. By combing immunostaining, laser-confocal functional imaging, optical mapping, force measurements, and targeted pharmacology, we can identify clear and distinguishable differences in the phenotypic properties of the ventricular and atrial engineered tissues. We then demonstrate the potential of such chamber-specific cardiac-tissue models for various physiological studies, disease modeling, and drug testing applications.

Results

Differentiation into ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes

Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) were differentiated into ventricular- or atrial-like cells using protocols based on the sequential manipulation of the BMP, activin-nodal, Wnt, and retinoic-acid (RA) signaling pathways (Fig. 1a)^8,9. The main differences in the ventricular versus atrial differentiation protocols included variation in the concentrations of activin A and BMP4 at day 1 of differentiation (d1) for induction of atrial or ventricular mesoderm and the addition of retinoic-acid (RA, 0.25–0.5 µM) on d3 to induce differentiation of atrial cardiomyocytes. These differentiation schemes yielded spontaneous beating cardiomyocytes, whose chamber-specific phenotype could already be appreciated by their different beating patterns; slower and more vigorous contraction of the ventricular-like cells compared with the faster contraction of atrial cells (Supplementary Movie 1).

Fig. 1 — a Schematic representation of the human embryonic stem cells (hESC) differentiation protocols used to derive ventricular (blue) or atrial (red) cardiomyocytes. b, c Representative flow-cytometric analyses of the proportion of NKX2.5⁺/cTnT⁺ cells (left panels) and the proportion of MLC2V⁺ cells among these NKX2.5⁺/cTnT⁺ cells (right panels) in day 20 HES3-NKX2–5^gfp/w EBs using either the ventricular (b) or the atrial (c) differentiation protocols. Note that using the ventricular and atrial differentiation protocols ~1% and ~5% of the differentiating cells, respectively, were TnT⁺/Nkx2.5⁻ cells (sinoatrial node like cells) and that among the differentiating cTnT⁺/NKX2.5⁺ cells obtained ~71% and ~3%, respectively, were MLC2v positive. d Patch–clamp action potential (AP) recordings of hESC-derived ventricular (left tracing) and atrial (right tracing) cells during 1 Hz field stimulation. e Summary of AP duration (APD) measurements from hESC-derived ventricular (blue) and atrial (red) cells (values are expressed as mean ± SEM). Note that hESC-derived atrial cardiomyocytes (n = 17, biologically independent cells) displayed shorter APD₃₀, APD₅₀, and APD₉₀ values and decreased phase 0 maximal upstroke velocity compared with the ventricular cells (n = 13, biologically independent cells). Recordings were performed at 1 Hz stimulation frequency of. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, unpaired t test is used for comparison.

The HES3-NKX2–5^egfp/w reporter hESC line was used to monitor cardiomyocyte differentiation. Flow-cytometry analysis for eGFP (identifying NKX2–5-expressing cells) and the cardiac-specific marker cardiac troponin T (cTnT) on d20 confirmed the efficiency of both ventricular and atrial differentiation protocols, resulting in 88 ± 1% (n = 30) and 82 ± 2% (n = 34) eGFP⁺ and cTnT⁺ cardiomyocytes, respectively (Fig. 1b, c, left panels, values are expressed as mean ± SEM). We next evaluated the percentage of cTnT⁺/NKX2.5⁺ cells that also express MLC-2v, which is exclusively expressed in ventricular cardiomyocytes throughout development and is absent in atrial cells^1,8. Flow-cytometry analysis (Fig. 1b, c, right panels) revealed that the vast majority of cTnT⁺/NKX2.5⁺ cells derived using the ventricular differentiation protocol were MLC-2v⁺, whereas fewer than 5% of the differentiating cardiomyocytes obtained using the atrial-specific protocol expressed this marker (Fig. 1b, c, right panels). To further validate the ventricular-specific differentiation protocol, we plated the differentiating hPSC-derived ventricular CMs as single cells. Co-immunocytostaining studies performed 7d later demonstrated that 87.3 ± 0.1% (n = 24) of the plated cells expressing cardiac troponin I (cTnI) also expressed MLC-2V.

Interestingly, a small minority of the differentiating cells (~1% and ~5% in the atrial and ventricular differentiation protocols, respectively, in the FACS examples in Fig. 1b, c) were TnT-positive/Nkx2.5-negative. Such TnT⁺/NKX2.5⁻ cells, accounting for 5.9 ± 1.0% (n = 24) and 9.1 ± 1.0% (n = 35) of the cells in the ventricular and atrial differentiation protocols, were previously shown to represent sinoatrial node (SAN)-like pacemaker cells²¹ and may be responsible for the spontaneous automaticity of the generated atrial and ventricular EHTs.

We next verified that the functional properties of the differentiated cells are consistent with the appropriate ventricular- or atrial-like phenotypes. Patch–clamp analysis of isolated differentiated cells during 1 Hz field stimulation revealed shorter action potentials (APs) in the hESC-derived atrial cells compared with the ventricular cells (Fig. 1d). Consequentially, the measured AP duration (APD) at 90%, 50%, and 30% of repolarization were all significantly longer in the ventricular cells compared with atrial cells (APD₉₀: 372 ± 38 ms vs. 205 ± 9 ms, p < 0.0001; APD₅₀: 310 ± 33 ms vs. 147 ± 10 ms, p < 0.0001; and APD₃₀: 266 ± 29 ms vs. 115 ± 9 ms, p < 0.0001; n = 13 and 17, respectively, mean ± SEM, unpaired Student's t test, Fig. 1e). The AP maximal upstroke velocity was also steeper in the ventricular cells (11.8 ± 1.7 mV/ms, n = 13) when compared with the atrial myocytes (6.8 ± 0.8 mV/ms, p < 0.01, n = 17, Fig. 1e). In contrast, the average resting membrane potential (RMP) did not differ between the two cells types (−60 ± 2 mV and −63 ± 2 mV for the ventricular and atrial cells, respectively).

Taken together, these results indicate the successful differentiation of hESCs into atrial- and ventricular-like cardiomyocytes that can be used to generate chamber-specific engineered tissues.

Establishing EHTs

EHTs were generated by combining the differentiated hESC-derived ventricular or atrial cells with collagen (Fig. 2a). The hydrogel constructs condensed as rings within the casting molds. After initial matrix remodeling (d3), tissues were transferred onto passive silicon stretchers where they started to contract spontaneously (Supplementary Movie 2).

We initially evaluated for potential differences in the gene expression patterns of the chamber-specific EHTs by real-time qPCR (Fig. 2b). The general cardiomyocyte markers TNNI1, TNNT2, KCJ2, and GJA1 were all expressed in both the atrial and ventricular EHTs (Fig. 2b, top panel). The expression levels of TNNT2 and KCJ2 (responsible for the inward rectifier I_K1 current), which can be used as surrogates for the degree of cardiomyocyte maturity, were similar between the atrial and ventricular EHTs, suggesting a comparable maturation level. Yet, expressions of TNNT2 and KCJ2 were lower in both chamber-specific EHTs as compared with their levels in control adult human heart-derived atrial and ventricular tissues (Fig. 2b, top panel).

We next compared the expression levels of genes, known from the literature^1,8,40–43 to be differentially expressed either in atrial (Fig. 2b, middle panels) or ventricular cells (lower panel). These studies revealed significant differences in the expression levels of such chamber-specific genes between the atrial and ventricular EHTs. Thus, the atrial-specific genes GJA5 (encoding for the gap junction protein connexin 40), KCNA5 (responsible for the expression of the ultra-rapid potassium current (I_Kur) in atrial cells), KCNJ3 (responsible for the expression of the I_KACh potassium current in atrial cells), NNPA (encoding for atrial natriuretic factor), MYL7 (encoding for the myosin regulatory light chain 2, atrial isoform), and NR2F2 (encoding for the COUP transcription factor 2 known to play an important role in determining atrial identity) were all expressed significantly higher in the atrial EHTs as compared with the ventricular EHTs. These genes were also expressed significantly higher in the control human adult atrial tissue as compared with the control human adult ventricular tissue.

In contrast to the atrial-specific gene expression, the expression levels of the primarily ventricular-specific markers MYL2 (encoding for the myosin regulatory light chain 2, ventricular isoform), MYH7 (encoding for the beta-myosin heavy chain), and HEY2 (a cardiac-specific transcription factor) were significantly higher in the ventricular EHTs as compared with the atrial EHTs. This correlated with their different expression levels in the control adult human heart-derived atrial and ventricular samples (Fig. 2b, lower panel).

The observed chamber-specific differences between the atrial and ventricular EHTs at mRNA levels were also noted at the protein levels. Thus, co-immunostaining studies targeting the general cardiac sarcomeric protein cTnI and the ventricular-specific marker MLC-2v revealed that the expression of the latter was significantly enriched in the ventricular-EHTs as compared with atrial tissues (Fig. 2c). Morphometric analysis of the stained specimens, quantifying the relative expression of MLC-2v (calculated as the percentage out the total EHT cellular volume that expresses cTnI that also expresses MLC-2v), revealed that it was significantly higher in the ventricular EHTs (88.8 ± 2.7%, n = 9) as compared with the atrial tissues (1.3 ± 0.1%, n = 9). In contrast to the MLC2v staining, co-immunostaining for cTnI and for the atrial-specific marker sarcolipin (SLN)²⁰ showed robust expression of the latter protein in the atrial EHTs and its absence in the ventricular tissues (Fig. 2d). Finally, we also evaluated for the expression of non-myocytes cells in the EHTs. Co-immunostaining for the fibroblast marker vimentin and cTnI revealed the presence of a small number of fibroblasts in both atrial and ventricular EHTs (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b).

Another excellent chamber-specific differentiating marker is the type of gap junction protein expressed by the tissue, as connexin 40 (Cx40) is known to be expressed in atrial but not in ventricular cells, whereas connexin 43 (Cx43), the major ventricular gap junction protein, is also expressed in atrial cells. We therefore evaluated in our chamber-specific EHTs, at both the mRNA and protein levels, the expression levels of Cx40 and Cx43. As noted in the qPCR studies, expression of the GJA5 gene (encoding for Cx40) was significantly higher in the atrial EHTs (Fig. 2b, middle panel). In contrast, GJA1 (encoding for Cx43) was expressed in both ventricular and atrial EHTs, with the expression levels being somewhat higher in the ventricular EHTs (Fig. 2b, top panel). We next performed western blot analysis that confirmed the chamber-specific expression pattern of Cx43 and Cx40 also at the protein level (Fig. 2e). Hence, while the atrial EHTs expressed high protein levels of Cx40, its expression in the ventricular EHTs was miniscule (n = 8, p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test). In contrast, we noted significant protein expression of Cx43 in both the ventricular and atrial EHTs, with the expression levels being significantly higher in the ventricular EHTs (n = 8, p < 0.01).

Finally, we also performed transmission electron microscopy of both chamber-specific EHTs, which revealed the presence of cardiomyocytes with organized sarcomeres with a similar degree of ultrastructural maturation (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). T-tubules, seen abundantly in adult ventricular cells but not in adult atrial myocytes, were absent in both the ventricular and atrial EHTs, indicating their relative early-stage ultrastructural properties.

Electrophysiological assessment of the atrial and ventricular-engineered tissues

Atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes in the human heart differ in their electrophysiological properties due to the expression of a different repertoire of ion channels⁴³. Atrial myocytes have shorter APs with distinct triangular-shaped morphology that differ from APs in ventricular cells⁴³. To study the electrophysiological properties of the chamber-specific EHTs, we loaded the tissues with the voltage-sensitive dye, FluoVolt, and subjected them to laser-confocal microscopy. We utilized the line-scan mode to allow both high spatial and temporal resolutions, enabling the derivation of optical APs at the cellular resolution within the EHTs during 1 Hz field stimulation. The recorded optical APs displayed distinct morphologies that significantly differed between the atrial and ventricular EHTs (Fig. 3a). For example, the measured APD₉₀, APD₅₀, and APD₃₀ values were all significantly longer in the ventricular tissues when compared with the respective atrial tissue-constructs (APD₉₀: 420 ± 11 ms vs. 230 ± 5 ms, p < 0.0001; APD₅₀: 254 ± 8 ms vs. 152 ± 4 ms, p < 0.0001; and APD₃₀: 190 ± 7 ms vs. 118 ± 3 ms; p < 0.0001, n = 42 and n = 46, respectively, in four EHTs each, unpaired Student's t test, Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3 — a Confocal line-scan images showing examples of optical AP recordings of atrial and ventricular cells within the chamber-specific EHTs. b Comparison of mean APD₃₀, APD₅₀, and APD₉₀ values in the atrial and ventricular EHTs (n = 46 and n = 42 cells, respectively, from three independent experiments) during 1 Hz field stimulation. ****p < 0.0001, unpaired t test. c, d Changes in AP morphology (c) and duration (APD₉₀) (d) following application of increasing doses (0, 2, 5, 10 µM) of carbamylcholine and 1.5 Hz field stimulation in the chamber-specific EHTs. Note that significant AP shortening was observed in the atrial (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001), but not in the ventricular EHTs (p = NS, repeated-measurements two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc analysis, n = 19 cells from three independent experiments for both the atrial and ventricular experiments). e Changes in mean APD₃₀, APD₅₀, and APD₉₀ values following application of 30 µM verankalant during 1.5 Hz field stimulation. The atrial cells (n = 25 cells from three independent experiments) showed significant prolongations while the effect on the ventricular cells (n = 32 cells from three independent experiments) was not statistically significant. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, unpaired t test.

To assess the potential use of chamber-specific EHTs for drug testing applications, we initially evaluated drugs known to affect APD. An important distinguishable electrophysiological property between atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes is the presence of the IK_ACh current in atrial, but not ventricular, cells⁴⁴. To evaluate the functional significance of this current in the chamber-specific EHTs, we tested the effects of adding the muscarinic-receptor agonist carbamylcholine at escalating doses (0, 2, 5, and 10 µM); hypothesizing that carbamylcholine will significantly impact only the atrial-EHTs’ AP properties. Since carbamylcholine can also change the spontaneous beating rates of the tissues (thereby indirectly affecting APD), we performed these drug studies during continuous 1.5 Hz pacing. Figure 3c shows an example of an optical AP recorded from an atrial-EHT at baseline and the resulting change in AP morphology following application of 10 µM carbamylcholine. Carbamylcholine caused a dose-related shortening of APD in all atrial-EHTs studies (Fig. 3d). For example, 10 µM of the drug significantly prolonged APD from a baseline APD₉₀ value of 297 ± 16 ms to 233 ± 17 ms (n = 19 cells from three independent experiments, p < 0.01). In contrast, carbamylcholine had no significant effects on the ventricular EHTs at any dose (Fig. 3d, n = 19 cells from three independent experiments, p = NS).

Vernakalant is an atrial-selective anti-arrhythmic agent, shown to be highly effective in converting atrial fibrillation (AF)⁴⁵ through its effects on several atrial potassium currents⁴⁶ to prolong atrial repolarization. Administration of 30 µM of vernakalant significantly prolonged the measured APD values in all atrial-EHTs when compared with baseline values (APD₉₀: 248 ± 13 ms vs. 479 ± 17 ms, p < 0.001; APD₅₀: 149 ± 10 ms vs. 257 ± 16 ms, p < 0.001; and APD₃₀: 110 ± 10 ms vs. 172 ± 13 ms, p < 0.01, unpaired Student's t test; n = 25 in three independent EHTs paced at 1.5 Hz; Fig. 3e, left panel). In contrast, vernakalant had no significant effects on the ventricular EHTs’ APD (Fig. 3e, right panel, n = 32, unpaired Student's t test).

Optical mapping

We next proceeded to characterize the electrophysiological properties of the chamber-specific EHTs at the tissue level by analyzing their conduction properties. To this end, the EHTs were loaded with the voltage-sensitive dye Di-4-ANBDQBS and imaged using a high-resolution optical mapping system consisting of a high-speed EM-CCD camera mounted on a fluorescent macroscope. These studies confirmed the development of a functional cardiac syncytium in the chamber-specific EHTs, with synchronized AP wave propagation (Supplementary Movie 3).

Interestingly, a significant difference was noted in the baseline rhythm of the ventricular and atrial EHTs. In the ventricular tissues, we observed a normal activation pattern that was initiated at a primary pacemaker region developing in each EHT, with the activation wavefront then propagating to synchronously activate the rest of the ventricular-EHT (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Movie 3). In contrast, the majority of the atrial-EHTs displayed different types of arrhythmias at baseline. These rhythm disorders were all re-entrant in nature, but varied in their level of complexity (Fig. 4b; Supplementary Movie 4). In some cases, we detected a large single circular re-entry wave propagating around the generated ring (Fig. 4b, left panel; Supplementary Movie 4). In other atrial-EHTs, we noted the presence of a single or multiple spiral-wave reentrant loops (Fig. 4b, middle and right panels; Supplementary Movie 4). The biophysical properties of these rotors could be analyzed through the use of both activation (Fig. 4b) and phase maps (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4 — a Activation map of a ventricular EHT during spontaneous activation showing the propagation of the electrical wavefront throughout the EHT from the earliest (red) to latest (purple) activation sites. b Activation maps of atrial engineered tissue during spontaneously-occurring different re-entrant arrhythmias including: a single anatomical macro-reentrant loop (left panel) and multiple spiral waves (middle and right panels). c A snap shot of a phase map characterizing the rotors in the atrial EHT. Colors represent phase as indicated in the color bar. d Time-lapse sequences (left panels) and the resulting activation maps (right panels) of wavefront propagation in an atrial EHT during an arrhythmia, during application of field stimulation, and following the renewal of normal activity. e Activation maps of ventricular and atrial EHTs during point stimulation at a frequency of 1.5 Hz. f Changes in conduction velocity (CV) values (left panel, n = 5, biologically independent samples) and APD₉₀ (right panel, n = 6, biologically independent samples) in the atrial and ventricular EHTs as function of the pacing cycle length (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, repeated-measurements two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc analysis). g–j Effects of addition of 100 µM lidocaine on the resulting activation maps (g, i) and mean CV values (h, j) of ventricular (g, h) and atrial (i, j) EHTs (n = 5 biologically independent samples). Recordings were performed at a stimulation frequency of 1.5 Hz. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, Mann–Whitney test.

In most of the arrhythmic atrial-EHTs, we were able to terminate the arrhythmias by applying an electrical field potential (electrical shock) using a prolonged field stimulation pulse. This resulted in arrhythmia conversion into normal activity with synchronous AP propagation from a single pacemaker region (Fig. 4d; Supplementary Movie 5). These results highlight the potential of the atrial-EHT as a model for atrial arrhythmias, such as AF.

After resumption of normal rhythm in the atrial engineered tissues, we studied and compared the conduction properties of the atrial and ventricular EHTs under similar conditions using continuous point electrical stimulation (Fig. 4e). To this end, we paced the chamber-specific EHTs at increasing frequency (1.5–3.5 Hz) and analyzed the resulting optical activation maps to measure the conduction velocity (CV) values. Significantly faster CVs were observed in the ventricular-EHTs as compared with the atrial tissues at all pacing frequencies, as can be appreciated in the corresponding CV versus pacing cycle length (CL) restitution plots (Fig. 4f, left panel). For example, the average CV measured at a pacing frequency of 1.5 Hz was significantly higher in the ventricular EHTs (21.4 ± 4.4 cm/s, n = 5, p < 0.0001, repeated-measurements two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc analysis) versus the atrial tissues (4.1 ± 0.2 cm/s, n = 5). Similar to the CV restitution plots, we could also derive APD₉₀ restitution curves, which demonstrated APD shortening at faster pacing rates (shorter CLs). Similar to the single-cell experiments, APD values were significantly shorter in the atrial EHTs when compared with the ventricular tissues at all pacing CLs studied (n = 6, Fig. 4f, right panel).

To examine the effective refractory period (ERP) of the atrial and ventricular EHTs, the tissues were paced with a train of ten stimulated APs at a fixed CL (S1), followed by a premature stimulus (S2). ERP was measured by gradually shortening the coupling interval of the premature stimulus (S1–S2) until loss-of-capture (Supplementary Fig. 2a). These studies revealed that the ventricular EHTs were characterized by significantly longer ERP values (240.0 ± 9.4 ms, n = 10) in comparison to the atrial EHTs (86.0 ± 2.9 ms, n = 10, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b).

We next studied the effect of lidocaine, a sodium channel blocker used for treating ventricular (but not atrial) arrhythmias, on the conduction properties of the chamber-specific EHTs. The EHTs were studied during pacing (1.5 Hz) at baseline and following application of 100 µM lidocaine. As shown in the resulting activation maps (Fig. 4g), the addition of lidocaine to the ventricular EHTs significantly slowed conduction (~66% decrease in mean CV values, Fig. 4h, n = 5, p < 0.05, Mann–Whitney test). In contrast, the effect of lidocaine on slowing CV in the atrial-EHTs was much milder and did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 4i, j).

Finally, we evaluated the usefulness of our established atrial EHT-based arrhythmia (AF-like) model for pharmacological testing. To this end, we evaluated the ability to convert the atrial arrhythmias into normal rhythm by exposing the arrhythmogenic atrial-EHTs to the anti-arrhythmic agents, vernakalant and flecainide (pharmacological cardioversion) as well as to field stimulation (electrical cardioversion). As can be seen in Supplementary Movie 6 and Fig. 5a, b, both flecainide (10 µM) and verankalant (30 µM) converted the arrhythmic EHTs into normal rhythm after 10 min of treatment. Field stimulation was also successful in restoring normal rhythm (Supplementary Movie 5). The success rate of converting the arrhythmias into normal rhythm was highest for field stimulation (86.6%, n = 30), followed by 10 µM flecainide (77.7%, n = 9), and 30 µM vernakalant (52.9%, n = 17) (Fig. 5c).

Interestingly, the vast majority (84.6%, n = 26, Fig. 5d) of the atrial-EHTs that were converted to a regular rhythm by field stimulation resumed arrhythmogenic activity spontaneously within 15 min. The patterns of the reentrant arrhythmias observed in these recurrences varied and differed from the original arrhythmia pattern in 40.9% of the cases. In contrast, most of the atrial-EHTs that were converted to regular rhythm and then continuously treated with anti-arrhythmic agents remained in normal rhythm (100% and 66.6% of EHTs treated with flecainide and verankalant, respectively, Fig. 5d). In the few cases where arrhythmias did re-occur their pattern was similar to the original reentry type.

Mechanical force measurements

In addition to the electrophysiological characterization of the tissues, we also evaluated their contractile properties. To this end, we utilized an experimental setup consisting of a sensitive force-transducer coupled with a length controller to study the mechanical properties of the tissues (Supplementary Fig. 3a). This allows direct measurement of both the passive and active forces of the atrial and ventricular EHTs. The constructs were then subjected to a series of length increases while being paced at a constant frequency (Fig. 6a). Forces were continuously evaluated during the stretching of the constructs allowing force measurement at each resting length (Fig. 6b).

The active force generated was calculated as the amplitude of the recorded twitch force at each specific tissue-construct length (Fig. 6c). We then normalized the forces measured per cross-sectional area (CSA), and plotted the active force against the changes in construct length. In all tissues, regardless of cardiac subtype, increments in tissue length enhanced active force production (Fig. 6d). Passive forces rose as well with tissue stretching in both EHT types (Supplementary Fig. 3b). The increase in measured forces with tissue stretching confirmed that both ventricular and atrial EHTs fulfill the fundamental force–length (Frank-Starling) relationship of cardiac muscle.

Comparison of the active force developed by the ventricular and atrial EHTs showed that the ventricular-engineered tissues developed significantly higher active forces than the atrial specimens at all tissues’ lengths (Fig. 6d). For example, at the initial resting state, the mean active force generated by the ventricular-EHTs (0.92 ± 0.09 mN/mm², n = 12) was significantly higher than that produced in the atrial-EHTs (0.19 ± 0.04 mN/mm², n = 12 p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test, Fig. 6e).

Finally, we studied the contraction forces of the atrial and ventricular EHTs under the effect of different treatments. Increasing extracellular calcium concentration (0.2–3.2 mM) resulted in enhanced inotropic responses of both tissues types (Fig. 6f, g). Interestingly, the nature of this calcium dependency differed between the atrial and ventricular EHTs, with the atrial EHTs requiring a higher calcium concertation to reach 50% of the maximal force (Fig. 6f, g).

We also studied the effect of drugs with opposing ionotropic actions on the EHTs. These studies were performed at the resting tissue-construct tension and during 2 Hz of constant field stimulation. Application of 10 µM isoproterenol, a β-adrenergic agonist, to both chamber-specific tissues (Fig. 6h; Supplementary Fig. 4a) significantly increased their forces of contraction by >70% (Fig. 6i). In contrast, incubation with the negative inotropic agent L-type calcium channel blocker nifedipine (0.1 µM) significantly reduced the force of contraction in both the ventricular (Fig. 6j) and atrial (Supplementary Fig. 4b) EHTs by >50% (Fig. 6k).

Discussion

The ability to combine hPSCs technologies, advanced cardiomyocyte differentiation protocols, and various tissue engineering strategies facilitated the establishment of engineered human cardiac muscle tissue-constructs, with important implications for cardiovascular regenerative medicine, disease modeling, and drug discovery^28–39. Until now, however, such engineered tissues were assembled mostly from a mixture of different cardiomyocyte cell types (ventricular-, atrial-, and nodal-like cells), which presented a major challenge in fulfilling their potential for the aforementioned applications. In this study, similar to other attempts in the field^47,48, we aimed to address this challenge by utilizing a development biology-guided hPSCs differentiation strategy⁸ to generate chamber-specific cardiomyocytes and eventually to derive ventricular and atrial EHTs.

Our results demonstrate: (1) the ability to robustly generate both ventricular and atrial EHTs, using a collagen-based hydrogel approach; (2) that the atrial and ventricular EHTs differentially express several chamber-specific markers (including unique transcription factors, sarcomeric, ion channel, and gap junction protein subtypes) at both the RNA and protein levels; (3) that the generated chamber-specific EHTs display distinct ventricular or atrial molecular, electrophysiological, and contractile properties; (4) the ability to use this strategy for drug testing by demonstrating chamber-specific functional effects following application of atrial/ventricular-specific pharmacology; (5) the ability to study complex electrophysiological phenomena such as conduction and reentrant arrhythmias and specifically the potential of using the atrial-EHT as a model to study AF; and (6) the ability to characterize the mechanical properties of the chamber-specific EHTs, with the ventricular tissues producing significantly greater contractile forces than the atrial-EHTs.

Examining the electrophysiological properties of the chamber-specific EHTs revealed triangular-shaped and shorter optical APs in the atrial-EHTs compared with ventricular tissues, in correlation to what is known of the human heart⁴³. We next examined the effect of drugs known to display differential activity on atrial and ventricular tissues. Carbamylcholine, known to open the atrial I_KACh channel⁴⁹, had a dose-related effect to significantly shorten the APD in the atrial-EHTs, whereas its effect on the ventricular-EHTs was negligible. Another agent known to specifically affect atrial electrophysiology is vernakalant^45,46. This anti-arrhythmic agent, which affects a variety of sodium and potassium channels, displays a marked specificity for blocking the atrial-specific currents I_Kur and I_KACh, thereby specifically prolonging of the atrial APD and refractory period⁴⁶. Consistent with these known actions, vernakalant significantly prolonged APD in our atrial-EHTs, whereas it had no significant effect on the ventricular tissues.

To study more complex electrophysiological phenomena such as conduction and re-entrant arrhythmias, we combined our chamber-specific EHT models with a high-resolution optical mapping system, previously established in our laboratory to study 2D cardiomyocyte monolayers⁵⁰. These studies revealed the development of a functional cardiac syncytium in both types of EHTs, with synchronized AP propagation. Under identical pacing stimulation, CV in the ventricular EHTs was faster than in the atrial tissues. One potential mechanism underlying this difference may be the steeper upstroke velocity of the ventricular APs (compared with the atrial APs) as noted in the patch–clamp studies. Another potential contributing factor may be the type of gap junctions protein expressed by the chamber-specific EHTs. Hence, while the ventricular EHTs, similar to the adult ventricle, express high levels of Cx43 (thereby assembling primarily homotypic Cx43-Cx43 gap junctions); the atrial EHTs, in a similar manner to the in vivo atria, express both Cx40 and to a lesser extent Cx43 (thereby potentially also assembling homotypic and heteromeric gap junctions consisting of a mixture of these proteins). This difference may impact the tissue’s impulse propagation, as shown elegantly by Beauchamp et al.⁵¹, who studied atrial tissue strands prepared from a combination of control and homozyogous or heterozygous mice with genetic deficiency of either Cx43 or Cx40. Their results demonstrated that dominance of Cx40 decreases electrical wave propagation velocity whereas dominance of Cx43 increases the speed of conduction.

Interestingly, CVs measured in our chamber-specific EHTs (and specifically in the ventricular EHTs) were significantly higher than most previous reports evaluating hPSC-derived 2D monolayer-based or 3D EB-based models^50,52,53 and were similar to other EHT models^27,28 indicating a relative high degree of tissue structural organization and electrophysiological maturation. Consequentially, the CV values measured in the ventricular EHT model (>20 cm/s) are now in the same magnitude, albeit still somewhat lower, as values reported in the in vivo human atria (~50 cm/s)^54,55 and ventricles (50–100 cm/s)⁵⁶. Finally, we also showed the utility of our chamber-specific tissue models for evaluating drug effects on conduction. Application of the class Ib anti-arrhythmic agent lidocaine, for example, which is used to treat ventricular (but not atrial) arrhythmias, significantly slowed CV in the ventricular-EHTs while having limited (and not significant) effects on the atrial-EHTs.

An important implication of this study is the ability to utilize the chamber-specific EHT models to study re-entrant arrhythmias, and specifically to focus on atrial arrhythmias such as AF. Interestingly, re-entrant arrhythmias developed spontaneously in most atrial-EHTs. In contrast, the ventricular EHTs seldom developed arrhythmia spontaneously or following electrical stimulation protocols. This difference in arrhythmias susceptibility probably stems from the marked electrophysiological differences observed between the two tissue types. Since the tissue wavelength (WL) is a product of the tissue refractory period and CV, the slower CV and shorter refractory period (or its surrogate measurement-APD) observed in the atrial-EHTs resulted in a markedly shorter WL in this tissue type as compared with the ventricular-EHTs. Since a shorter tissue WL is associated with a greater probability for initiation and maintenance of re-entrant circuits, this explains the marked differences in arrhythmogenicity between the two EHT types. This finding may also explain why AF and other atrial arrhythmias are more common clinically and are easier to induce than ventricular arrhythmias, despite the larger ventricular tissue mass.

The development of the atrial-EHT arrhythmia model also allowed us to evaluate the effects of various therapeutic interventions. Consequentially, we were able to interrupt/terminate arrhythmic activity in the atrial-EHTs by clinically relevant interventions, such as electrical and pharmacological cardioversion. Electrical field stimulation was the most effective modality with ~90% arrhythmia termination rates, with pharmacological treatments (flecainide and verankalant) also being highly effective. Moreover, the atrial-EHT model was useful as a drug-testing platform, both for studying drugs’ efficacy in terminating arrhythmias (pharmacological cardioversion) and in preventing initiation of new arrhythmias (rhythm-control strategy).

As a proof-of-concept for demonstrating the utility of our atrial-EHTs, we studied the effect of the well-established type Ic anti-arrhythmic agent flecainide and showed its ability to terminate the atrial arrhythmias in the atrial-EHT model. To demonstrate the power of our system to predict the effects of relatively novel drugs, we also evaluated the effects of verankalant, which was recently introduced into clinical practice because of its high success rate in converting acute AF⁴⁵. Verankalant terminated the re-entrant activity in our atrial-EHT model and, to a lesser extent, also prevented the development of new arrhythmias. The chamber-specific EHT models also revealed the relative selective action of vernakalant in primarily affecting the atrial (prolonging APD), but not the ventricular, electrophysiological properties. It is thought that the effects of verankalant result from its action on multiple currents^46,57. Vernakalant is known to induce a frequency- and voltage-dependent I_Na block, which is probably its most important action with regard to AF termination since it preferably effects intra-atrial conduction at fast rates. In addition, the drug also inhibits the early activating K⁺ channels (I_Kur; I_to) and I_KACh⁵⁷. Since, I_Kur and I_KACh are atrial-specific currents, this also contributes to the relative atrial selectivity of the drug in prolonging refractory period and its efficacy in terminating AF⁵⁷.

Finally, we characterized and compared the mechanical properties of the ventricular and atrial EHTs. In both chamber-specific tissues, we observed the typical length–tension relationships (Frank-Starling mechanism) of cardiac muscle⁵⁸. The forces recorded in the EHTs (~2 mN/mm) are in a similar range to other previously reported tissue engineered cardiac muscle models utilizing hPSC-CMs, with some studies reporting higher values^28,59 and others lower or similar force magnitude^60,61. The forces measured in both chamber-specific EHTs, however, were significantly lower than those generated by the adult human heart muscle^62–65. Interestingly, the ventricular-EHTs generated higher forces of contraction compared to the atrial tissues, correlating with previous findings in atrial and ventricular fibers derived from healthy human hearts^65,66. Both chamber-specific EHTs displayed increased forces of contraction following elevation of extracellular Ca²⁺ levels, with the atrial-EHTs requiring higher Ca²⁺ concentration to reach 50% of the maximal contraction amplitude. This is consistent with early studies showing that human atrial tissue is less sensitive to calcium than ventricular tissues^65,67. Also, both chamber-specific EHTs responded to pharmacological agents known to affect contractility, with isoproterenol and nifedipine causing an increase and decrease in the developed forces, respectively.

The chamber-specific EHT models presented here also possess certain limitations. The hPSC-CMs and the resulting chamber-specific EHTs are not as mature as the adult human cardiac tissue, as evident, for example, by the reduced expression levels of maturation-related genes such as TNNT2 and KCJ2 (responsible for the inward rectifier I_K1 current) and by the lack of t-tubules. Moreover, despite improvements relative to previously described hPSC-derived tissue models, some important functional parameters such as the cells’ resting membrane potential (which is relatively depolarized at ~−60 mv), the measured conduction velocities, and the amplitudes of the mechanical forces generated still did not reach the same level of maturity as the adult heart. This early maturity state represents a general limitation in the hPSC-CMs field⁶⁸, and similar results were observed in other hPSC-based EHT models^22,61. This limitation may be ameliorated by ongoing efforts in the field to generate a more mature hPSC-CMs by using different hormonal treatments^69,70, optimizing extracellular matrix composition⁷¹, mechanical and electrical training²⁸, and a variety of other interventions⁶⁸. Finally, the macroscropic structure of the generated tissues was relative simple (ring-shaped EHTs) and did not differ between the atrial and ventricular tissues. Ongoing and future efforts using either decellularized organs or advanced three-dimensional bio-printing⁴⁸ will attempt to also combine the atrial/ventricular cells with the relevant chamber-specific structures.

In conclusion, despite the aforementioned limitations, our results show that chamber-specific hPSC-based EHTs can be generated, and that the derived atrial- and ventricular-engineered heart tissues recapitulate fundamental structural and functional properties ascribed to each cardiac chamber. These models can be used in several cardiac research fields, such as developmental biology, disease modeling (including of AF), drug development, and drug testing.

Methods

Differentiation into ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes

The HES3-NKX2-5^egfp/w reporter hESC line (kind gift from Prof. Elefanti) was used in this study. The approach for ventricular and atrial differentiation was recently described⁸, and is outlined in Fig. 1a. Briefly, undifferentiated hESC colonies were grown on MEF feeder layer, and maintained with the DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1× nonessential amino acids, 55 μM β-mercaptoethanol, and 20% KnockOutTM serum replacement. To induce differentiation, cells were cultured as embryoid bodies (EBs) and cultivated in suspension in backbone medium containing StemPro-34 (Thermo-Fisher) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 150 µg/ml transferrin (Roche), 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid, and 50 µg/ml monothioglycerol (MTG). Culture medium was supplemented on day 0 (for 18 h) with 1 ng/ml rhBMP4 (R&D) and 10 µM ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 (TOCRIS). On day 1, backbone medium was supplemented with rhBMP4 (10 ng/mL for ventricular or 3 ng/mL for atrial differentiation), rhActivinA (10 ng/mL or 2 ng/m for ventricular/atrial differentiation, R&D) and 5 ng/ml rhbFGF. On day 3, medium was supplemented with 10 ng/mL rhVEGF (R&D), 1 µM IWP2 (Wnt inhibitor, TOCRIS), and for atrial differentiation also with retinoic-acid (RA, 0.25–0.5 µM, Sigma). On day 5, culture medium was replaced with CDM3 medium⁷² composed of RPMI-1640, 0.33% l-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AA 2-P), 0.66% human albumin, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. After 20 days of culture, EBs were enzymatically dissociated into single cells using collagenase2 (Worthington) and TrypLE (Gibco) for flow cytometry, patch–clamp analysis, immunocytostaining, and creation of engineered tissues.

Flow cytometry

For intracellular staining of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and myosin light chain 2 ventricle (MLC-2V), dissociated cardiomyocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in PBS with 5% FCS and 0.5% Saponin, and washed again with PBS containing 0.5% BSA (Sigma). Cells were then stained overnight (4 °C) with the unconjugated primary antibodies targeting cTnT (MA5-12960, Thermo-Fisher Scientific) and MLC-2V (ab79935, Abcam) in FACS buffer consisting of PBS with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco). Cells were then washed again and stained with secondary antibodies (diluted in PBS with 5% FCS) for 1 h at 4 °C. Finally, cells were evaluated with the LSR FortessaII flow cytometer (BD-Biosciences), and FlowJo software.

Patch–clamp studies

The action potentials (APs) of ventricular and atrial single cells were measured in whole-cell patch clamp configuration. Cells were plated on glass coverslips, and APs were recorded from spontaneously contracting cardiomyocytes kept in Tyrode’s solution (NaCl 140 mM, KCl 5.4 mM, CaCl₂ 1.8 mM, MgCl₂ 1 mM, HEPES 10 mM, and glucose 10 mM, pH, 7.4). The pipette solution consisted of KCl 120 mM, MgCl₂ 1 mM, Mg-ATP 3 mM, HEPES 10 mM, and EGTA 10 mM, pH 7.2. APs were recorded and analyzed using the current-clamp mode using Axopatch 700B, Digidata 1440 A, and pClamp 10 (Axon Instruments). APs were recorded during 1 Hz stimulation.

Generation of the engineered heart tissues

Engineered heart tissues (EHTs) were generated by combining 2 million hESC-derived atrial/ventricular cells with bovine collagen (LLC Collagen-Solutions) and 2× DMEM (containing 40% 5× DMEM, 40% fetal bovine serum, 15% H₂O, 10 µl/ml glutamine, and 20 µl/ml penicillin/streptomycin). The mixture was pipetted into circular casting molds, where it condensed for 3 days and then transferred onto a silicon passive stretcher. Medium (Iscove-Medium with 20% fetal bovine serum, 1% nonessential amino acids, 1% glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 100 µmol/l β-mercaptoethanol) was changed every other day.

Real-time quantitative PCR

The total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (QIAGEN; 74704) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNAse treatment was performed on 500 ng RNA using RQ1 RNAse-free DNAse. First strand cDNA was generated from 100 ng RNA of each sample using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicates using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master and using the LightCycler 480 instrument. mRNA relative levels were calculated based on the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method. The Ct for each mRNA and endogenous control GAPDH in each sample were used to create ΔCt values [Ct(mRNA) – Ct(GAPDH)]. For cardiac and atrial genes, relative quantification (RQ) was calculated by subtracting the average ΔCt of ventricular samples from the average ΔCt of atrial samples, and using the equation: RQ = 2^−ΔΔCt. The calculation for ventricular genes was done in a similar way, using the average ΔCt of ventricular samples as a reference. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Immunostaining

EHTs were frozen and cut into sections (10 μm). The slides were permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 and then blocked with 5% horse serum. They were subsequently incubated with primary antibodies cTnI (1:150, MAB 1691, Merck), MLC-2v (1:150, ab79935, Abcam), SLN (1:150, sc-46261, Santa Cruz) and vimentin (1:150, ab92547, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. Specimens were washed and stained with appropriate secondary antibodies Cy2, Cy3, Cy5 (1:150, Jackson) and DAPI. The preparations were examined using a Zeiss LSM-710 laser-scanning confocal microscope. For quantitative volumetric analysis of the images obtained, the Imaris software was used.

To quantify the percentage of ventricular cells obtained using the ventricular differentiation protocol, differentiating hPSC-derived ventricular CMs were plated as single cells. After 7d in culture, we performed co-immunostaining studies of the plated cells for cTnI and MLC-2v. The resulting images were analyzed using the Imaris software.

Transmission electron microscopy

The tissue samples were fixed in 3.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Blocks of 1 mm³ were prepared and post-fixed (1 h) with 2% OsO4 in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer. To remove excess osmium, samples were rinsed again in cacodylate buffer. Tissue blocks were then immersed in saturated aqueous uranyl acetate, dehydrated in graded alcohol solutions, immersed in propylene oxide, and finally embedded in Epon 812. Sections (80 nm), derived from the blocks, were attached to a thin-bar copper grid, and counterstained with saturated uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Examination of the different sections was performed with the Jeol1011-JEM electron microscope at 80 KV.

Western blot analysis

EHTs were lysed with ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and then homogenized by beads (bullet-blender-storm-24, Next Advance). In total, 40 µg of protein from the samples were mixed and resolved in 4× Laemmli Sample Buffer (BioRad) and incubated in RT for 1 h before loading on polyacrylamide gels (BioRad). The electrophoresed proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes via Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (BioRad). The membranes were incubated for 60 min with 3.5% dry milk (Santa Cruz) in Tris-buffered saline (TBST) to block nonspecific binding sites. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used included: anti-Cx40 and anti-Cx43 (both at 1:1000 in 5% BSA in TBST, AB-1726 and SC-9059, respectively, Santa Cruz), and anti-β actin (1:1000 in 5% BSA in TBST, ab8224, Santa Cruz). This was followed by incubation with HRP-coupled secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature (BioRad, 1:5000 in 3.5% milk in TBST). Proteins were revealed with ECL Prime (BioRad), and images were acquired using a LAS4000 Camera (GE Healthcare). For quantifications, band intensities were measured, and densitometry was determined using imageJ. Unprocessed scans of the resulting blots are available in the Source Data file.

Laser-confocal optical action potentials recordings

EHTs were loaded with the voltage-sensitive dye, FluoVolt (Invitrogen) and imaged using the line-scan mode of Zeiss LSM-710 laser-scanning confocal microscope. Tissues were excited using a 488-nm solid-state laser, and emission was split by a variable secondary dichroic beam splitter set at 493 nm collecting the high wavelengths part of the spectrum (λ > 493 nm) into the photomultiplier detector. The tissues were kept in a heated organ bath in Tyrode’s solution, and field stimulated (Warner-Instruments stimulator). The acquired optical action potentials depict changes in fluorescence that is emitted by the cells, which correlates with changes in membrane potential. Such recordings are noisier than the direct electrical intracellular patch–clamp recordings, and lack absolute values. A custom-written Matlab software was used for signal analysis of the optical signals and measurement of APD at 30, 50, and 90% of repolarization (APD₃₀, APD₅₀, and APD₉₀).

Optical mapping

To study the tissues’ conduction properties, EHTs were incubated with 25 μM of the voltage-sensitive dye Di-4-ANBDQBS (purchased from Prof. Leslie M. Loew, University of Connecticut Health Campus) for 10 min at room temperature. Imaging was performed using a fast electron-multiplying charge coupled device (EM-CCD) camera (Evolve^® 512 Delta, Photometrics, 512 × 512 pixel) mounted on a fluorescent macroscope (Olympus MVX10). EHTs were maintained in a heated organ bath in Tyrode’s solution and electrically point-stimulated using a custom-built platinum/iridium bipolar electrode. The tissues were excited using LEDs (X-Cite^® TURBO, Excelitas-Technologies) with peak wavelengths at 630 nm, and emission was passed through 660 -nm long-pass dichroic mirror and 665 -nm long-pass filter (Chroma). A custom-designed software (kindly provided by Prof. Bum-Rak Choi, Brown University) was used for analysis, generation of activation maps, and conduction velocity measurements⁵⁰. All optical experiments were performed after initial incubation with Blebbistatin for 30 min (5 µmol/L, Sigma-Aldrich) to prevent motion artifacts. Optical mapping studies were performed during spontaneous rhythm, during arrhythmias, and during pacing (point stimulation using a custom-mode electrode). For quantifying AP (APD) and conduction (CV) properties EHTs were mapped during point stimulation at a fixed rate (1 Hz). To derive restitution APD and CV plots, EHTs were paced at escalating frequencies (several steps from a pacing CL of 1000 ms to 200 ms).

Effective refractory period measurements

Programmed electrical stimulation was used to measure the effective refractory periods (RPs) of the atrial and ventricular EHTs. These experiments involved gradual shortening of the coupling interval (S1–S2) between the last stimulus of a train of pacing stimuli given at a fixed rate (S1, pacing CL of 500 ms) and a premature extra-stimulus (S2) until loss of capture of the premature stimuli.

Pharmacological studies

Vernakalant (30 µM, Cardiome), carbomylcholin (2, 5, and 10 µM), lidocaine (100 µM), flecainide (10 µM), and isoproterenol (10 µM) were dissolved in H₂O, and nifedipine (0.1 µM) was dissolved in DMSO (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Optical AP recordings and force measurements were performed 10 min after addition of the tested drugs.

Force measurements

EHTs were placed on stainless steel hooks attached to a force-transducer and a length controller (Aurora-Scientific, model 403 A/322 C), perfused with Tyrode’s solution, and electrically field stimulated. Following initial length standardization, EHTs were stretched at sequential steps of 0.1 mm up to 124% of the initial length. Both the passive and active forces generated by the tissues were continuously measured. Forces were also measured at different extracellular Ca²⁺ levels (0.2–3.2 mM, 2 Hz pacing), following application of isoproterenol (10 µM) and nifedipine (0.1 µM), and at various pacing frequencies (1–2.5 Hz). A perfusion system (Warner-Instruments) was used to maintain temperature at 31 ^oC and infuse drugs. Force and length signals were digitally recorded and analyzed using custom-written Matlab software. At the end of the experiments, the EHTs cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured for normalization.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 6 was used for statistical analysis. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SEM. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies. Normality tests (d’agostino & pearson or shapiro wilk) were performed for the continuous variables. For single-cell (patch–clamp) data and for the confocal optical imaging studies of the EHTs, samples size (n) represents the number of cells analyzed from ≥ three independent experiments or EHTs.

Repeated-measurements two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak post hoc analysis was carried out for comparison of serial measurements in multiple groups such as between the atrial and ventricular EHTs in the: (1) dose–response pharmacological studies; (2) for the restitution plot studies evaluating changes in CV and APD₉₀ at different pacing rates; and (3) for evaluating changes in the active forces measured at different EHT lengths. Unpaired Student’s t test was carried out for comparisons between two groups of continuous variables. For cases where the normal distribution criterion was not met, the Mann–Whitney test was used. For categorical variables, the Fisher test was performed.

We considered p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information^{(978.9KB, pdf)}

Supplementary Movie 1^{(7.4MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 2^{(10.7MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 3^{(3MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 4^{(8.6MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 5^{(3MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 6^{(5.7MB, avi)}

Peer Review File^{(558KB, pdf)}

Reporting Summary^{(1.3MB, pdf)}

41467_2019_13868_MOESM10_ESM.pdf^{(27.5KB, pdf)}

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the European Research Council (ERC-2017-COG-773181-iPS-ChOp-AF) and by the Technion-UHN research collaboration fund.

Source data

Source data^{(2.2MB, xlsx)}

Author contributions

I.G. and L.G. designed the experiments; S.P., Y.N. and G.K established the hPSC atrial and ventricular differentiation system and provided the hPSC chamber-specific cardiomyocytes for the study. I.G. derived the chamber-specific EHTs, performed the detailed characterization studies (immunostaining, gene expression, and electrophysiological studies) and also analyzed the results. A.S., A.G., N. Shaeen established the methods and performed some of the optical electrophysiological studies. N. Setter performed the western blot experiments. I.G. and L.G. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the paper, and L.G. supervised this research project.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The source data underlying most figures (Figs. 1–4, 6; Supplementary Figs. 2, 3) are provided as a Source Data file.

Code availability

The custom-written Matlab software used in this study is available at: https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/224485637.

Competing interests

G.K. is a scientific cofounder and advisor of BlueRock Therapeutics. S.P. has an active consulting agreement with BlueRock Therapeutics. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Igor Efimov, Yuji Shiba and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-13868-x.

References

1.Ng SY, Wong CK, Tsang SY. Differential gene expressions in atrial and ventricular myocytes: insights into the road of applying embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for future therapies. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010;299:C1234–C1249. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00402.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Caspi O, et al. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes improves myocardial performance in infarcted rat hearts. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007;50:1884–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Chong JJ, et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature. 2014;510:273–277. doi: 10.1038/nature13233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Kehat I, et al. Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22:1282–1289. doi: 10.1038/nbt1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Laflamme MA, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:1015–1024. doi: 10.1038/nbt1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Zwi-Dantsis L, et al. Derivation and cardiomyocyte differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from heart failure patients. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34:1575–1586. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Shiba Y, et al. Allogeneic transplantation of iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerates primate hearts. Nature. 2016;538:388–391. doi: 10.1038/nature19815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Lee JH, Protze SI, Laksman Z, Backx PH, Keller GM. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes develop from distinct mesoderm populations. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:179–194 e174. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Yang L, et al. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature. 2008;453:524–528. doi: 10.1038/nature06894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Devalla HD, et al. Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015;7:394–410. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Burridge PW, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat. Med. 2016;22:547–556. doi: 10.1038/nm.4087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Stillitano, F. et al. Modeling susceptibility to drug-induced long QT with a panel of subject-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. eLife6, e19406 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13.Moretti A, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:1397–1409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Sun N, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells as a model for familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:130ra147. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Itzhaki I, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;471:225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature09747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Matsa E, Ahrens JH, Wu JC. Human induced pluripotent stem cells as a platform for personalized and precision cardiovascular medicine. Physiol. Rev. 2016;96:1093–1126. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.van Meer BJ, Tertoolen LG, Mummery CL. Concise review: measuring physiological responses of human pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes to drugs and disease. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2008–2015. doi: 10.1002/stem.2403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.He JQ, Ma Y, Lee Y, Thomson JA, Kamp TJ. Human embryonic stem cells develop into multiple types of cardiac myocytes: action potential characterization. Circ. Res. 2003;93:32–39. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000080317.92718.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Zhang J, et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 2009;104:e30–e41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.192237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Chen Z, et al. Subtype-specific promoter-driven action potential imaging for precise disease modelling and drug testing in hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:292–301. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Protze SI, et al. Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat. Biotech. 2017;35:56–68. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Laksman Z, et al. Modeling atrial fibrillation using human embryonic stem cell-derived atrial tissue. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05652-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Bizy A, et al. Myosin light chain 2-based selection of human iPSC-derived early ventricular cardiac myocytes. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11:1335–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Weinberger F, Mannhardt I, Eschenhagen T. Engineering cardiac muscle tissue: a maturating field of research. Circ. Res. 2017;120:1487–1500. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Ogle BM, et al. Distilling complexity to advance cardiac tissue engineering. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:342ps313. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Lemoine MD, et al. Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes cultured in 3D engineered heart tissue show physiological upstroke velocity and sodium current density. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05600-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Shadrin IY, et al. Cardiopatch platform enables maturation and scale-up of human pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered heart tissues. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1825. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01946-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Ronaldson-Bouchard K, et al. Advanced maturation of human cardiac tissue grown from pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2018;556:239–243. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0016-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Tiburcy M, et al. Defined engineered human myocardium with advanced maturation for applications in heart failure modeling and repair. Circulation. 2017;135:1832–1847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Lemoine MD, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered heart tissue as a sensitive test system for QT prolongation and rrhythmic Triggers. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006035. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Cashman TJ, Josowitz R, Johnson BV, Gelb BD, Costa KD. Human engineered cardiac tissues created using induced pluripotent stem cells reveal functional characteristics of BRAF-mediated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PloS One. 2016;11:e0146697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Goldfracht I, et al. Engineered heart tissue models from hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and cardiac ECM for disease modeling and drug testing applications. Acta Biomat. 2019;92:145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Mosqueira D, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 editing in human pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocytes highlights arrhythmias, hypocontractility, and energy depletion as potential therapeutic targets for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:3879–3892. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Eder A, Vollert I, Hansen A, Eschenhagen T. Human engineered heart tissue as a model system for drug testing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;96:214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Smith AS, Macadangdang J, Leung W, Laflamme MA, Kim DH. Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and tissue engineering strategies for disease modeling and drug screening. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017;35:77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Shaheen N, Shiti A, Gepstein L. Pluripotent stem cell-based platforms in cardiac disease modeling and drug testing. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2017;102:203–208. doi: 10.1002/cpt.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Weinberger F, et al. Cardiac repair in guinea pigs with human engineered heart tissue from induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:363ra148. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Gao L, et al. Large cardiac muscle patches engineered from human induced-pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cells improve recovery from myocardial infarction in swine. Circulation. 2018;137:1712–1730. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Riegler J, et al. Human engineered heart muscles engraft and survive long term in a rodent myocardial infarction model. Circ. Res. 2015;117:720–730. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Ellinghaus P, et al. Comparing the global mRNA expression profile of human atrial and ventricular myocardium with high-density oligonucleotide arrays. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005;129:1383–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Gaborit N, et al. Regional and tissue specific transcript signatures of ion channel genes in the non-diseased human heart. J. Physiol. 2007;582:675–693. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Schwach V, et al. A COUP-TFII Human embryonic stem cell reporter line to identify and select atrial cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1765–1779. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Schram G, Pourrier M, Melnyk P, Nattel S. Differential distribution of cardiac ion channel expression as a basis for regional specialization in electrical function. Circ. Res. 2002;90:939–950. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000018627.89528.6F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Dobrev D, et al. Molecular basis of downregulation of G-protein-coupled inward rectifying K(+) current (I(K,ACh) in chronic human atrial fibrillation: decrease in GIRK4 mRNA correlates with reduced I(K,ACh) and muscarinic receptor-mediated shortening of action potentials. Circulation. 2001;104:2551–2557. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Beatch GN, Bhirangi K, Juul-Moller S, Rustige J. Efficacy and safety of vernakalant for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in the asia-pacific region: a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. J. Cardiovasc. Pharm. 2017;69:86–92. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Wettwer E, et al. The new antiarrhythmic drug vernakalant: ex vivo study of human atrial tissue from sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013;98:145–154. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Zhao Y, et al. A platform for generation of chamber-specific cardiac tissues and disease modeling. Cell. 2019;176:913–927 e918. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Lee A, et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 2019;365:482–487. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Koumi S, Arentzen CE, Backer CL, Wasserstrom JA. Alterations in muscarinic K+ channel response to acetylcholine and to G protein-mediated activation in atrial myocytes isolated from failing human hearts. Circulation. 1994;90:2213–2224. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.90.5.2213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Shaheen N, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets expressing genetically encoded voltage indicator for pharmacological and arrhythmia studies. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10:1879–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Beauchamp P, et al. Relative contributions of connexins 40 and 43 to atrial impulse propagation in synthetic strands of neonatal and fetal murine cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2006;99:1216–1224. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000250607.34498.b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Kehat I, Gepstein A, Spira A, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Gepstein L. High-resolution electrophysiological assessment of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: a novel in vitro model for the study of conduction. Circ. Res. 2002;91:659–661. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000039084.30342.9B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Zhu H, et al. Two dimensional electrophysiological characterization of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte system. Scie Rep. 2017;7:43210. doi: 10.1038/srep43210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Hansson A, et al. Right atrial free wall conduction velocity and degree of anisotropy in patients with stable sinus rhythm studied during open heart surgery. Eur. Heart J. 1998;19:293–300. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Li J, et al. Three-dimensional computer model of the right atrium including the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes predicts classical nodal behaviours. PloS One. 2014;9:e112547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Aras KK, Faye NR, Cathey B, Efimov IR. Critical volume of human myocardium necessary to maintain ventricular fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythmi. Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006692. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Ravens U, Poulet C, Wettwer E, Knaut M. Atrial selectivity of antiarrhythmic drugs. J. Physiol. 2013;591:4087–4097. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.256115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Holubarsch C, et al. Existence of the Frank-Starling mechanism in the failing human heart. Investigations on the organ, tissue, and sarcomere levels. Circulation. 1996;94:683–689. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Godier-Furnémont AFG, et al. Physiologic force-frequency response in engineered heart muscle by electromechanical stimulation. Biomaterials. 2015;60:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Mannhardt I, et al. Human engineered heart tissue: analysis of contractile force. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7:29–42. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Ruan JL, et al. Mechanical stress conditioning and electrical stimulation promote contractility and force maturation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human cardiac tissue. Circulation. 2016;134:1557–1567. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Bening C, Hamouda K, Leyh R. Sex differences in volume overload in skinned fibers. BMC Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016;16:197. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0370-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Bening C, et al. Contractile properties of the right atrial myofilaments in patients with myxomatous mitral valve degeneration. BMC Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014;14:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Maier LS, et al. Ca(2+) handling in isolated human atrial myocardium. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2000;279:H952–H958. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.3.H952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.van der Velden J, et al. Isometric tension development and its calcium sensitivity in skinned myocyte-sized preparations from different regions of the human heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999;42:706–719. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00337-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Morano I, Bletz C, Wojciechowski R, Ruegg JC. Modulation of crossbridge kinetics by myosin isoenzymes in skinned human heart fibers. Circ. Res. 1991;68:614–618. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.68.2.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Morano I, Arndt H, Gartner C, Ruegg JC. Skinned fibers of human atrium and ventricle: myosin isoenzymes and contractility. Circ. Res. 1988;62:632–639. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.62.3.632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Yang X, Pabon L, Murry CE. Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cir. Res. 2014;114:511–523. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.300558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Parikh SS, et al. Thyroid and glucocorticoid hormones promote functional t-tubule development in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2017;121:1323–1330. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Birket MJ, et al. Contractile defect caused by mutation in MYBPC3 revealed under conditions optimized for human PSC-cardiomyocyte function. Cell Rep. 2015;13:733–745. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Herron TJ, et al. Extracellular matrix-mediated maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac monolayer structure and electrophysiological function. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003638. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.003638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Burridge PW, et al. Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:855–860. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information^{(978.9KB, pdf)}

Supplementary Movie 1^{(7.4MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 2^{(10.7MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 3^{(3MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 4^{(8.6MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 5^{(3MB, avi)}

Supplementary Movie 6^{(5.7MB, avi)}

Peer Review File^{(558KB, pdf)}

Reporting Summary^{(1.3MB, pdf)}

41467_2019_13868_MOESM10_ESM.pdf^{(27.5KB, pdf)}

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Data Availability Statement

The custom-written Matlab software used in this study is available at: https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/224485637.

[CR1] 1.Ng SY, Wong CK, Tsang SY. Differential gene expressions in atrial and ventricular myocytes: insights into the road of applying embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for future therapies. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010;299:C1234–C1249. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00402.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Caspi O, et al. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes improves myocardial performance in infarcted rat hearts. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007;50:1884–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Chong JJ, et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature. 2014;510:273–277. doi: 10.1038/nature13233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Kehat I, et al. Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22:1282–1289. doi: 10.1038/nbt1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Laflamme MA, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:1015–1024. doi: 10.1038/nbt1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Zwi-Dantsis L, et al. Derivation and cardiomyocyte differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from heart failure patients. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34:1575–1586. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Shiba Y, et al. Allogeneic transplantation of iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerates primate hearts. Nature. 2016;538:388–391. doi: 10.1038/nature19815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Lee JH, Protze SI, Laksman Z, Backx PH, Keller GM. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes develop from distinct mesoderm populations. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:179–194 e174. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Yang L, et al. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature. 2008;453:524–528. doi: 10.1038/nature06894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Devalla HD, et al. Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015;7:394–410. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Burridge PW, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat. Med. 2016;22:547–556. doi: 10.1038/nm.4087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Stillitano, F. et al. Modeling susceptibility to drug-induced long QT with a panel of subject-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. eLife6, e19406 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR13] 13.Moretti A, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:1397–1409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Sun N, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells as a model for familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:130ra147. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Itzhaki I, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;471:225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature09747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Matsa E, Ahrens JH, Wu JC. Human induced pluripotent stem cells as a platform for personalized and precision cardiovascular medicine. Physiol. Rev. 2016;96:1093–1126. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.van Meer BJ, Tertoolen LG, Mummery CL. Concise review: measuring physiological responses of human pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes to drugs and disease. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2008–2015. doi: 10.1002/stem.2403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.He JQ, Ma Y, Lee Y, Thomson JA, Kamp TJ. Human embryonic stem cells develop into multiple types of cardiac myocytes: action potential characterization. Circ. Res. 2003;93:32–39. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000080317.92718.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Zhang J, et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 2009;104:e30–e41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.192237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Chen Z, et al. Subtype-specific promoter-driven action potential imaging for precise disease modelling and drug testing in hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:292–301. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Protze SI, et al. Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat. Biotech. 2017;35:56–68. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Laksman Z, et al. Modeling atrial fibrillation using human embryonic stem cell-derived atrial tissue. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5268. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05652-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Bizy A, et al. Myosin light chain 2-based selection of human iPSC-derived early ventricular cardiac myocytes. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11:1335–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Weinberger F, Mannhardt I, Eschenhagen T. Engineering cardiac muscle tissue: a maturating field of research. Circ. Res. 2017;120:1487–1500. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Ogle BM, et al. Distilling complexity to advance cardiac tissue engineering. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:342ps313. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Lemoine MD, et al. Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes cultured in 3D engineered heart tissue show physiological upstroke velocity and sodium current density. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:5464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05600-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Shadrin IY, et al. Cardiopatch platform enables maturation and scale-up of human pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered heart tissues. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1825. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01946-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Ronaldson-Bouchard K, et al. Advanced maturation of human cardiac tissue grown from pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2018;556:239–243. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0016-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Tiburcy M, et al. Defined engineered human myocardium with advanced maturation for applications in heart failure modeling and repair. Circulation. 2017;135:1832–1847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Lemoine MD, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived engineered heart tissue as a sensitive test system for QT prolongation and rrhythmic Triggers. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006035. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Cashman TJ, Josowitz R, Johnson BV, Gelb BD, Costa KD. Human engineered cardiac tissues created using induced pluripotent stem cells reveal functional characteristics of BRAF-mediated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PloS One. 2016;11:e0146697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Goldfracht I, et al. Engineered heart tissue models from hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and cardiac ECM for disease modeling and drug testing applications. Acta Biomat. 2019;92:145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Mosqueira D, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 editing in human pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocytes highlights arrhythmias, hypocontractility, and energy depletion as potential therapeutic targets for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:3879–3892. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Eder A, Vollert I, Hansen A, Eschenhagen T. Human engineered heart tissue as a model system for drug testing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;96:214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Smith AS, Macadangdang J, Leung W, Laflamme MA, Kim DH. Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and tissue engineering strategies for disease modeling and drug screening. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017;35:77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Shaheen N, Shiti A, Gepstein L. Pluripotent stem cell-based platforms in cardiac disease modeling and drug testing. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2017;102:203–208. doi: 10.1002/cpt.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Weinberger F, et al. Cardiac repair in guinea pigs with human engineered heart tissue from induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:363ra148. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Gao L, et al. Large cardiac muscle patches engineered from human induced-pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cells improve recovery from myocardial infarction in swine. Circulation. 2018;137:1712–1730. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Riegler J, et al. Human engineered heart muscles engraft and survive long term in a rodent myocardial infarction model. Circ. Res. 2015;117:720–730. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Ellinghaus P, et al. Comparing the global mRNA expression profile of human atrial and ventricular myocardium with high-density oligonucleotide arrays. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005;129:1383–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Gaborit N, et al. Regional and tissue specific transcript signatures of ion channel genes in the non-diseased human heart. J. Physiol. 2007;582:675–693. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Schwach V, et al. A COUP-TFII Human embryonic stem cell reporter line to identify and select atrial cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1765–1779. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Schram G, Pourrier M, Melnyk P, Nattel S. Differential distribution of cardiac ion channel expression as a basis for regional specialization in electrical function. Circ. Res. 2002;90:939–950. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000018627.89528.6F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Dobrev D, et al. Molecular basis of downregulation of G-protein-coupled inward rectifying K(+) current (I(K,ACh) in chronic human atrial fibrillation: decrease in GIRK4 mRNA correlates with reduced I(K,ACh) and muscarinic receptor-mediated shortening of action potentials. Circulation. 2001;104:2551–2557. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Beatch GN, Bhirangi K, Juul-Moller S, Rustige J. Efficacy and safety of vernakalant for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in the asia-pacific region: a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. J. Cardiovasc. Pharm. 2017;69:86–92. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Wettwer E, et al. The new antiarrhythmic drug vernakalant: ex vivo study of human atrial tissue from sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013;98:145–154. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Zhao Y, et al. A platform for generation of chamber-specific cardiac tissues and disease modeling. Cell. 2019;176:913–927 e918. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.Lee A, et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 2019;365:482–487. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR49] 49.Koumi S, Arentzen CE, Backer CL, Wasserstrom JA. Alterations in muscarinic K+ channel response to acetylcholine and to G protein-mediated activation in atrial myocytes isolated from failing human hearts. Circulation. 1994;90:2213–2224. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.90.5.2213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.Shaheen N, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets expressing genetically encoded voltage indicator for pharmacological and arrhythmia studies. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10:1879–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR51] 51.Beauchamp P, et al. Relative contributions of connexins 40 and 43 to atrial impulse propagation in synthetic strands of neonatal and fetal murine cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2006;99:1216–1224. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000250607.34498.b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Kehat I, Gepstein A, Spira A, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Gepstein L. High-resolution electrophysiological assessment of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: a novel in vitro model for the study of conduction. Circ. Res. 2002;91:659–661. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000039084.30342.9B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Zhu H, et al. Two dimensional electrophysiological characterization of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte system. Scie Rep. 2017;7:43210. doi: 10.1038/srep43210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Hansson A, et al. Right atrial free wall conduction velocity and degree of anisotropy in patients with stable sinus rhythm studied during open heart surgery. Eur. Heart J. 1998;19:293–300. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.Li J, et al. Three-dimensional computer model of the right atrium including the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes predicts classical nodal behaviours. PloS One. 2014;9:e112547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.Aras KK, Faye NR, Cathey B, Efimov IR. Critical volume of human myocardium necessary to maintain ventricular fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythmi. Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006692. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.Ravens U, Poulet C, Wettwer E, Knaut M. Atrial selectivity of antiarrhythmic drugs. J. Physiol. 2013;591:4087–4097. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.256115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Holubarsch C, et al. Existence of the Frank-Starling mechanism in the failing human heart. Investigations on the organ, tissue, and sarcomere levels. Circulation. 1996;94:683–689. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Godier-Furnémont AFG, et al. Physiologic force-frequency response in engineered heart muscle by electromechanical stimulation. Biomaterials. 2015;60:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Mannhardt I, et al. Human engineered heart tissue: analysis of contractile force. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7:29–42. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.Ruan JL, et al. Mechanical stress conditioning and electrical stimulation promote contractility and force maturation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human cardiac tissue. Circulation. 2016;134:1557–1567. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Bening C, Hamouda K, Leyh R. Sex differences in volume overload in skinned fibers. BMC Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016;16:197. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0370-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Bening C, et al. Contractile properties of the right atrial myofilaments in patients with myxomatous mitral valve degeneration. BMC Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014;14:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Maier LS, et al. Ca(2+) handling in isolated human atrial myocardium. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2000;279:H952–H958. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.3.H952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.van der Velden J, et al. Isometric tension development and its calcium sensitivity in skinned myocyte-sized preparations from different regions of the human heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999;42:706–719. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00337-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Morano I, Bletz C, Wojciechowski R, Ruegg JC. Modulation of crossbridge kinetics by myosin isoenzymes in skinned human heart fibers. Circ. Res. 1991;68:614–618. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.68.2.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Morano I, Arndt H, Gartner C, Ruegg JC. Skinned fibers of human atrium and ventricle: myosin isoenzymes and contractility. Circ. Res. 1988;62:632–639. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.62.3.632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR68] 68.Yang X, Pabon L, Murry CE. Engineering adolescence: maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cir. Res. 2014;114:511–523. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.300558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR69] 69.Parikh SS, et al. Thyroid and glucocorticoid hormones promote functional t-tubule development in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2017;121:1323–1330. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Birket MJ, et al. Contractile defect caused by mutation in MYBPC3 revealed under conditions optimized for human PSC-cardiomyocyte function. Cell Rep. 2015;13:733–745. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Herron TJ, et al. Extracellular matrix-mediated maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac monolayer structure and electrophysiological function. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003638. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.003638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR72] 72.Burridge PW, et al. Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:855–860. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Generating ring-shaped engineered heart tissues from ventricular and atrial human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Idit Goldfracht

Stephanie Protze

Assad Shiti

Noga Setter

Amit Gruber

Naim Shaheen

Yulia Nartiss

Gordon Keller

Lior Gepstein

Abstract

Introduction

Results

Differentiation into ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes

Fig. 1. Differentiation and characterization of the human embryonic stem cells derived ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes.

Establishing EHTs

Fig. 2. Chamber-specific EHTs generation and characterization.

Electrophysiological assessment of the atrial and ventricular-engineered tissues

Fig. 3. Electrophysiological characterization of the chamber-specific EHTs.

Optical mapping

Fig. 4. Optical mapping of the chamber-specific EHTs.

Fig. 5. Electrical and pharmacological cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias.

Mechanical force measurements

Fig. 6. Mechanical force assessment in the chamber-specific EHTs.

Discussion

Methods

Differentiation into ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes

Flow cytometry

Patch–clamp studies

Generation of the engineered heart tissues

Real-time quantitative PCR

Immunostaining

Transmission electron microscopy

Western blot analysis

Laser-confocal optical action potentials recordings

Optical mapping

Effective refractory period measurements

Pharmacological studies

Force measurements

Statistical analysis

Reporting summary

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Source data

Author contributions

Data availability

Code availability

Competing interests

Footnotes

Supplementary information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases