Abstract
Brain metastases from endometrial adenocarcinoma are quite rare. Here, we report a case of a 64-year-old woman who presented with a history of left limb weakness of 45 days’ duration. Her medical history was significant for the endometrial carcinoma diagnosed 13 years earlier, for which she had undergone a total hysterectomy. The patient received a craniotomy and was finally diagnosed with brain metastasis from endometrial adenocarcinoma. We performed a MEDLINE search of the pertinent literature, searching for information focusing on the diagnosis, mechanism, treatment, and prognosis of this rare tumor type.
Keywords: Brain metastasis, endometrial carcinoma, whole-brain radiotherapy
Introduction
Endometrial adenocarcinoma is the most common invasive gynecological tumor among women [1,2], yet brain metastases from this disease are rare with an estimated incidence of less than 0.3% and generally portend a poor prognosis and limited life expectancy [3]. Studies show that patients develop brain metastasis an average of 19 months after primary treatment, and 97 percent of relapses are detected within 5 years [4,5]. Here we report one case of endometrial carcinoma which developed brain metastases 13 years after a hysterectomy but was disease free at all other locations.
Case report
A 64-year-old woman presented with a history of left limb weakness of 45 days’ duration. No other symptoms, such as headache, dizziness, or amnesia were presented. A neurological examination showed that the muscle strength of the left limbs were grade 4. The medical history was significant for endometrial carcinoma diagnosed 13 years earlier, for which she had undergone a total hysterectomy. The histologic finding was a FIGO grade 2, stage Ia endometrioid adenocarcinoma. No adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy was given after the surgery. After admission to our ward, the patient received a series of examinations. The MRI revealed a 33*31*28 mm mass in the right parietal region. The tumor was isointense on T1-weighed images (Figure 1A, 1B) and hypointense on T2-weighed images (Figure 1C) and showed mulberry enhancement with obvious brain edema (Figure 1D-F). A preoperative chest X-ray was normal and the serum CA-125 was 40.6 U/ml. 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography showed no intense FDG uptake except in the right parietal region. On the basis of these findings, the patient was suspected of suffering from a metastatic tumor, and a craniotomy was performed.
Figure 1.

(A, B) Axial T1-weighted MRI reveals a 33*31*28 mm isointense mass in the right parietal region. (C) Axial T2-weighted MRI shows a hypointense mass. (D) Axial, (E) Sagittal and (F) Coronal enhanced T1-weighted MRI shows a mulberry enhancement mass with obvious brain edema.
At surgery, a solid mass of greyish-red appearance was found in the parietal lobe, with a rich blood supply. The boundary of the tumor was clear, and all the tumor tissues were removed under the microscope. The further course was uneventful, and postoperative imaging showed the preceding mass being totally removed.
A histologic examination revealed that the tumor was composed of hyperchromatic nuclei cells with finely stippled chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios (Figure 2A, 2B). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CK (AE1/AE3), CK7, ER, PR, P16 and PAX-8 and non-immunoreactive for CK20, Napsin A, CDX2, WT1, and vimentin. The tumor tissues also showed focal positively for P53, and the Ki-67 index was 30% (+) (Figure 2C-F). Thus, the diagnosis of brain metastasis from endometrial carcinoma was established. The patient’s symptoms improved. Although there was a slight, fine motor disturbance in the left upper limb, no other neurological signs or symptoms occurred after the operation. At 12-months follow-up, the patient remained well with no clinical or neuroradiological evidence of recurrence (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

Histologic examination revealed the tumor was composed of hyperchromatic nuclei cells with finely stippled chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios (A) (hematoxylin and eosin, 200×), (B) (400×). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CK (C), ER (D), PAX-8 (E), and PR (F).
Figure 3.

Axial T1-weighted MRI (A), Axial, Sagittal and Coronal T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI image shows there is no evidence of the tumor existing at the 12-month follow-up (B-D).
Discussion
Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common invasive malignancy of the female genital tract [6]. The disease usually spreads into the surrounding tissue by direct infiltration and disseminates through the lymphatic pathways. Distant hematogenous metastases are less common, and the most frequent sites are the lungs, liver, and bone [6]. The spread of disease to the brain is a rare event with an estimated incidence of less than 0.3%, and which generally portends a poor prognosis [3]. The median survival for endometrial carcinoma patients after the diagnosis of brain metastasis varies from 3 to 6 months [1,6], and the median interval between the completion of primary treatment and the diagnosis of brain metastasis was only 2 months [5]. It is reported that almost two thirds of patients relapse within 2 years, and there are very few incidences of recurrence beyond 5 years post-surgery [4]. Researchers have identified the factors that are associated with brain metastases in endometrial cancer, and they include poorly differentiated tumors and advanced surgical stage [5]. However, there have been very few patients who relapsed after 5 years. Lee [7] reported one case of endometrial carcinoma that developed brain metastases 8 years after the primary treatment. In our case, the tumor relapsed 13 years after her hysterectomy. To our knowledge, this is the longest interval for a patient with endometrial carcinoma having brain metastasis after the primary surgery. What’s interesting is that some researchers found that endometrial carcinoma may metastasize very early, even before the symptoms of the primary tumor become evident [8], but other studies determined that brain metastases develop long after the primary treatment for endometrial cancer [5,7,9,10].
In our opinion, early stage endometrial carcinoma may spread to the brain after a long interval and often manifests as a single brain metastasis. In contrast, poorly differentiated endometrial neoplasms with vessel permeation and deep myometrial invasion can metastasize to the brain early and tend to occur as a part of a widely disseminated disease and as a late event in the course of the disease [6,11]. The primary mechanism of spread has been suggested as dissemination to the lungs, then to the brain via the pulmonary vasculature [5,9]. However, the specific mechanism of how endometrial neoplasms metastasize to the brain without concomitant lung disease is unclear.
There are several hypotheses which may explain the mechanisms for solitary brain lesions to appear without lung involvement [3]. The first is that tumor emboli could access the cerebral circulation through an alternate route, such as Batson’s spinal venous plexus and aberrant circulation. A second mechanism for the appearance of isolated brain lesions is the passage of the tumor through the intra-cardiac and pulmonary circulations without finding a place to establish a metastatic lesion. The third is that a small volume of the disease present, but it goes undiagnosed in the lungs and is subsequently cleared by an endogenous immune response or, more likely, extrinsically administered cytotoxic chemotherapy [3].
The treatment of brain metastasis resulting from endometrial carcinoma consists of surgical resection, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), chemotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, or combinations of these therapeutic modalities [11]. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment in patients with brain involvement regardless of tumor origin, especially for a single lesion [11]. Often, surgical resection followed by WBRT is the best option for a single BM in a patient with solitary and resectable lesions with good overall health and performance status [5,6,12]. Patients treated with a combination of surgery and radiotherapy experienced a longer median survival than patients who are treated with either surgery or radiotherapy alone (15 months VS 2 months) [12]. Our case received a tumor resection, followed by WBRT with a total dose of 30 Gy (3 Gy per fraction for 10 fractions). The patient showed no evidence of tumor recurrence 12 months after treatment. For patients with multiple brain lesions, Ratner et al. found that the prognosis of brain metastasis resulting from endometrial carcinoma may be much better using a combination of gamma knife radiosurgery and WBRT than in the patients who received gamma knife radiosurgery or WBRT alone [13]. Chemotherapy is not the choice for patients with isolated brain metastasis in EC because the transition of chemotherapeutic drugs from the brain-blood barrier is limited [14]. However, Nakagawa et al. asserted that the damage of this barrier could facilitate the transition of the chemotherapeutics drugs after the early period of the craniotomy, suggesting it is an option for combined therapy [15]. Kimyon et al. conducted a meta-analysis and found that chemotherapy was not associated with improved post-brain involvement survival [11]. Therefore, further clinical research is still needed to determine the role of chemotherapy in patients with BM resulting from endometrial carcinoma.
In conclusion, brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma are rare and usually occur in widely disseminated disease. However, our cases should alert clinicians to keep in mind that low tumor grade, with no presence of lymphovascular space invasion can also be correlated with the future development of brain metastases, even many years after primary tumor resection. Whether routine brain imaging should be undertaken in a subset of patients with identifiable risk factors is an unanswered question in the literature due to the low incidence. Patients with BM from endometrial carcinoma many years after primary treatment have a better prognosis than those who developed BM early on after a hysterectomy. Timely surgical resection followed by WBRT is the best choice for patients, especially for those whose tumors can be completely removed.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant no. LQ15H010001).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Mahmoud-Ahmed AS, Suh JH, Barnett GH, Webster KD, Belinson JL, Kennedy AW. The effect of radiation therapy on brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:305–309. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Perrone AM, Girolimetti G, Cima S, Kurelac I, Livi A, Caprara G, Santini D, Castellucci P, Morganti AG, Gasparre G, De Iaco P. Pathological and molecular diagnosis of bilateral inguinal lymph nodes metastases from low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma: a case report with review of the literature. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3944-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elliott KS, Borowsky ME, Lee YC, Rao C, Abulafia O. Prolonged survival in recurrent endometrial carcinoma to the brain. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95:247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sohaib SA, Houghton SL, Meroni R, Rockall AG, Blake P, Reznek RH. Recurrent endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrent disease and assessment of prognosis. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.06.015. discussion 35-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gien LT, Kwon JS, D’Souza DP, Radwan JS, Hammond JA, Sugimoto AK, Carey MS. Brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:524–528. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shiohara S, Ohara M, Itoh K, Shiozawa T, Konishi I. Successful treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases of endometrial carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13:71–76. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee WJ, Chen CH, Chow SN. Brain metastases from early stage endometrial carcinoma 8 years after primary treatment: case report and review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:890–891. doi: 10.1080/00016340600616983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kottke-Marchant K, Estes ML, Nunez C. Early brain metastases in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;41:67–73. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90257-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wroński M, Zakowski M, Arbit E, Hoskins WJ, Galicich JH. Endometrial cancer metastasis to brain: report of two cases and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1993;39:355–359. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(93)90199-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ruelle A, Zuccarello M, Andrioli G. Brain metastasis from endometrial carcinoma. Report of two cases. Neurosurg Rev. 1994;17:83–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00309993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kimyon G, Turan T, Basaran D, Turkmen O, Karalok A, Tasci T, Tulunay G, Kose MF. Is neurosurgery with adjuvant radiotherapy an effective treatment modality in isolated brain involvement from endometrial cancer?: from case report to analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27:315–325. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Monaco E, Kondziolka D, Mongia S, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Management of brain metastases from ovarian and endometrial carcinoma with stereotactic radiosurgery. Cancer. 2008;113:2610–2614. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ratner ES, Toy E, O’Malley DM, McAlpine J, Rutherford TJ, Azodi M, Higgins SA, Schwartz PE. Brain metastases in epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:856–859. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abrey LE, Olson JD, Raizer JJ, Mack M, Rodavitch A, Boutros DY, Malkin MG. A phase II trial of temozolomide for patients with recurrent or progressive brain metastases. J Neurooncol. 2001;53:259–65. doi: 10.1023/a:1012226718323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nakagawa H, Fujita T, Kubo S, Tokiyoshi K, Yamada M, Kanayama T, Hagiwara Y, Nakanomyo H, Hiraoka M. Difference in CDDP penetration into CSF between selective intraarterial chemotherapy in patients with malignant glioma and intravenous or intracarotid administration in patients with metastatic brain tumor. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996;37:317–326. doi: 10.1007/s002800050391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
