Abstract
Background
The prevalence of human infections with the zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni is rising worldwide. Therefore, the identification of compounds with potent anti-pathogenic and anti-inflammatory properties for future therapeutic and/or preventive application to combat campylobacteriosis is of importance for global health. Results of recent studies suggested carvacrol (4-isopropyl-2-methylphenol) as potential candidate molecule for the treatment of campylobacteriosis in humans and for the prevention of Campylobacter colonization in farm animals.
Results
To address this in a clinical murine infection model of acute campylobacteriosis, secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice were subjected to synthetic carvacrol via the drinking water starting 4 days before peroral C. jejuni challenge. Whereas at day 6 post-infection placebo treated mice suffered from acute enterocolitis, mice from the carvacrol cohort not only harbored two log orders of magnitude lower pathogen loads in their intestines, but also displayed significantly reduced disease symptoms. Alleviated campylobacteriosis following carvacrol application was accompanied by less distinct intestinal apoptosis and pro-inflammatory immune responses as well as by higher numbers of proliferating colonic epithelial cells. Remarkably, the inflammation-ameliorating effects of carvacrol treatment were not restricted to the intestinal tract, but could also be observed in extra-intestinal organs such as liver, kidneys and lungs and, strikingly, systemically as indicated by lower IFN-γ, TNF, MCP-1 and IL-6 serum concentrations in carvacrol versus placebo treated mice. Furthermore, carvacrol treatment was associated with less frequent translocation of viable C. jejuni originating from the intestines to extra-intestinal compartments.
Conclusion
The lowered C. jejuni loads and alleviated symptoms observed in the here applied clinical murine model for human campylobacteriosis highlight the application of carvacrol as a promising novel option for both, the treatment of campylobacteriosis and hence, for prevention of post-infectious sequelae in humans, and for the reduction of C. jejuni colonization in the intestines of vertebrate lifestock animals.
Keywords: Carvacrol, Anti-pathogenic and anti-inflammatory properties, Campylobacter jejuni, Secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice, Pro-inflammatory immune responses, Bacterial translocation, Host–pathogen-interaction, Intestinal immunopathology, Extra-intestinal and systemic immune responses
Background
In the United States, up to 10 million foodborne-related cases were estimated to be responsible for approximately 1300 deaths annually [1]. The presence of distinct bacterial species in livestock farming is associated with food-borne human infections resulting in gastrointestinal and post-infectious extra-intestinal morbidities with rising prevalence rates worldwide [2, 3]. Particularly Campylobacter infections are of substantial and increasing importance for food-borne diseases, whereas farm animals, especially poultry, are the main origin of human infection [4–6]. Following ingestion of raw or undercooked contaminated meat or surface water, symptoms of campylobacteriosis may vary considerably [7, 8]. Whereas some patients are even asymptomatic or present with rather mild symptoms, others suffer from abdominal cramps, fever, watery of even bloody and inflammatory diarrhea that usually resolve within 1 week. In rare cases, however, post-infectious sequelae such as Gullain-Barré syndrome, Miller Fisher syndrome, or reactive arthritis may manifest [9–11]. The pathogenesis of acute human campylobacteriosis is strongly triggered by the activation of innate immune responses via Toll-like Receptor-4 (TLR-4) mediated sensing of the bacterial lipooligosaccharide (LOS) that is expressed on the surface of C. jejuni [12, 13]. Thus, innate immune responses upon C. jejuni infection are very similar to those observed following peracute infections with other LOS expressing pathogens such as Neisseria meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae [14, 15].
Terpenoids are antimicrobial compounds that are effective against a broad range of microorganisms [16]. Carvacrol (4-isopropyl-2-methylphenol) is a monoterpenoid which constitutes a major compound in essential oils of thyme and oregano and other medicinal plants with many proven health beneficial effects [17, 18]. Carvacrol modulates a multitude of different enzymatic functions which are causative for its anxiolytic, spasmolytic, cell regenerative and anticancer activities and is further in the focus of infection research due to its natural antimicrobial effects against several food-borne pathogens including Campylobacter. In vitro studies revealed that in bacteriostatic concentrations, carvacrol is capable of inducing changes in the fatty acid composition of the bacterial cell walls [19, 20]. In bactericidal concentrations, however, carvacrol even permeabilizes the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria [21]. In addition, carvacrol possesses ATPase-inhibiting activity [22, 23] and is proposed to act as a proton exchanger that reduces the pH gradient across the cytoplasmic membrane causing changes in proton motive force and in the ATP pool, which leads to cell death [23, 24]. Both, in vitro and in vivo studies revealed that carvacrol application could effectively reduce C. jejuni loads in intestinal samples derived from chicken [25–28]. Furthermore, carvacrol could effectively reduce virulence gene expression and invasion of C. jejuni into chicken cells [26, 29]. Most importantly, the finding that carvacrol application resulted in inhibition of motility and invasive properties of C. jejuni in vitro points towards carvacrol as a promising candidate molecule for the combat of human campylobacteriosis [30]. Recently, our group has established a clinical murine C. jejuni infection model allowing for pre-clinical studies of potential compounds against campylobacteriosis at the pharmaceutical level. After peroral C. jejuni infection, secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice in which the intestinal microbiota had been depleted by antibiotic treatment could be stably colonized with C. jejuni at high pathogenic loads [12]. Given the lack of LOS resistance due to the absence of IL-10, these mice display C. jejuni induced acute enterocolitis within 1 week post-infection (p.i.) thereby mimicking clinical key features of severe campylobacteriosis [12, 31, 32]. In the present study, we applied this clinical murine model for human campylobacteriosis in order to investigate the therapeutic and/or even preventive efficacies of carvacrol treatment against C. jejuni colonization and immunopathological sequelae in vivo.
Results
Antimicrobial properties of carvacrol against C. jejuni isolates
We first addressed potential directed antimicrobial effects of carvacrol against C. jejuni. In vitro studies with 20 C. jejuni isolates including the reference strain 81–176 revealed carvacrol MIC90 values of 150 mg/l (pH 7.3).
Gastrointestinal pathogen loads following carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
We next assessed potential health-beneficial properties (i.e., anti-C. jejuni and anti-inflammatory effects) of synthetic carvacrol (500 mg/l via the drinking water, ad libitum) in the here applied clinical murine infection model for the study of severe human campylobacteriosis. To accomplish this, secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice were treated with carvacrol via the drinking water starting 4 days prior peroral C. jejuni infection with 109 bacterial cells by gavage on days 0 and 1. At day 6 p.i., placebo (PLC) treated control mice harbored median pathogen loads of 109 and 108 CFU/g in their colon and ileum, respectively, that were approximately 0.5 and 2.0 log orders of magnitude lower in mice from the carvacrol cohort, respectively (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively; Fig. 1). Hence, carvacrol treatment lowers intestinal C. jejuni burdens up to 2 orders of magnitude.
Clinical effects upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
We further performed a daily survey of C. jejuni induced symptoms in infected mice applying a standardized clinical scoring system assessing gross appearance of mice, stool consistency and abundance of blood in fecal samples. As early as 48 h after the latest of two peroral pathogenic challenges (i.e., on day 3 p.i.), mice from the carvacrol group displayed less severe C. jejuni induced disease as indicated by lower clinical scores as compared to PLC controls (p < 0.001; Additional file 1: Fig. S1), which also held true for days 5 and 6 p.i. (p < 0.001; Additional file 1: Fig. S1). At necropsy, PLC treated control mice suffered from acute enterocolitis characterized by wasting and bloody diarrhea (Fig. 2), whereas carvacrol treated mice, however, were clinically less compromised as indicated by significantly reduced scores for gross appearance, abundance of fecal blood and diarrhea (p < 0.001 vs. PLC; Fig. 2). Notably, all control mice, but only 10.5% of carvacrol treated animals presented with diarrhea at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.001; Fig. 2c). Hence, carvacrol treatment alleviates C. jejuni induced symptoms of campylobacteriosis in the here applied clinical murine infection model.
Apoptotic and regenerative responses in colonic epithelial cells upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
We next assessed whether the beneficial effects of carvacrol treatment on the macroscopic outcome of C. jejuni infected mice could also be observed on microscopic level. To address this, we stained colonic paraffin sections with defined antibodies against distinct cell inflammatory and proliferative/regenerative markers as well as against distinct immune cell populations applying in situ immunohistochemistry. At day 6 p.i., mice of either cohort exhibited increased numbers of caspase3 positive apoptotic cells in their colonic epithelia (p < 0.001 vs. naive; Fig. 3a). However, numbers of apoptotic cells were five times lower in colonic epithelia of carvacrol as compared to PLC treated mice at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.001; Fig. 3a; Additional file 2: Fig. S2A). We next stained large intestinal paraffin sections with antibodies against Ki67 and quantified the respective cell proliferation and regeneration counteracting C. jejuni induced cell damage microscopically. In fact, C. jejuni infection was accompanied by a marked increase in Ki67 positive colonic epithelial cells (p < 0.001 vs. naive; Fig. 3b; Additional file 2: Fig. S2B). Importantly, numbers of proliferative/ regenerative cells were significantly elevated in carvacrol as compared to PLC mice at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.001; Fig. 3b; Additional file 2: Fig. S2B). Hence, carvacrol treatment ameliorates murine campylobacteriosis by inhibiting apoptosis and stimulating regenerative processes in the colonic epithelia.
Colonic immune responses upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
We next quantitatively assessed large intestinal immune responses upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice. Within 6 days following C. jejuni infection, distinct immune cell populations such as CD3+ T lymphocytes cells and B220+ B lymphocytes had multifold increased in the colonic mucosa and lamina propria of mice from either cohort (p < 0.001; Fig. 3c, d; Additional file 2: Fig. S2C, D). Notably, colonic T lymphocytes, however, were lower following carvacrol as compared to PLC treatment at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.005, Fig. 3c; Additional file 2: Fig. S2C). The increased large intestinal abundances of immune cells upon C. jejuni infection were accompanied by enhanced secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-6 in colonic ex vivo biopsies obtained at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.05–0.001; Fig. 4a, c, d). Carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice, however, resulted in lower colonic NO, interferon (IFN)-γ and TNF concentrations as compared to PLC application (p < 0.05–0.001; Fig. 4a–c). Of note, IFN-γ levels measured in the large intestines of carvacrol treated mice at day 6 p.i. did not differ from those of naive control mice (n.s.; Fig. 4b). Hence, carvacrol dampened C. jejuni induced colonic inflammation.
Ileal inflammatory immune responses upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
In humans and murine infection models, C. jejuni induced intestinal inflammation is considered to primarily affect the large intestinal tract resulting in acute enterocolitis [9]. Nevertheless, we expanded our intestinal inflammatory survey of campylobacteriosis induced in secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice to the small intestines. At day 6 p.i., PLC, but not carvacrol treated mice displayed almost three time higher numbers of apoptotic ileal epithelial cells (p < 0.001 vs. naive; Additional file 3: Fig. S3A and Additional file 4: Fig. S4A), which was accompanied by increased B cell counts in the mucosa and lamina propria of C. jejuni infected mice from the PLC, but not carvacrol cohort (p < 0.001; Additional file 3: Fig. S3D and Additional file 4: Fig. S4D). In addition, irrespective of the treatment regimen, mice displayed increased numbers of proliferating ileal epithelial cells (p < 0.05–0.001; Additional file 3: Fig. S3B and Additional file 4: Fig. S4B) as well as of T lymphocytes (p < 0.001; Additional file 3: Fig. S3C and Additional file 4: Fig. S4C) in the small intestinal mucosa and lamina propria. The inflammation-ameliorating effects of carvacrol treatment also in the small intestinal tract of C. jejuni infected mice was further supported by increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IFN-γ in ileal ex vivo biopsies taken from PLC (p < 0.05–0.005 vs. naive), but not carvacrol treated mice at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.05 vs. PLC; Additional file 5: Fig. S5). Hence, the campylobacteriosis ameliorating properties of carvacrol were not restricted to the large intestinal tract, but also effective in the distal small intestines.
Inflammatory immune responses in MLN upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
We next surveyed disease ameliorating effects of carvacrol treatment in the MLN of C. jejuni infected mice. In support of our results obtained from the colon and ileum, less distinct secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators such as NO, IFN-γ, TNF and IL-6 could be assessed in MLN of carvacrol as compared to PLC treated mice at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.01–0.001; Fig. 5). Of note, the concentrations of the three latter cytokines measured in carvacrol treated C. jejuni infected mice did not differ from those obtained from naive control animals (n.s.; Fig. 5b–d). Hence, the anti-inflammatory properties of carvacrol in C. jejuni infected mice were also effective in MLN draining the intestinal tract.
Extra-intestinal including systemic inflammatory immune responses upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice
We further assessed disease-alleviating properties of carvacrol treatment in extra-intestinal including systemic compartments of C. jejuni infected mice. Increased numbers of caspase3 positive apoptotic cells could be observed in paraffin sections taken from liver, kidneys and lungs at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.005–0.001), whereas apoptotic cell counts in either organs were lower in carvacrol as compared to PLC treated mice (p < 0.05–0.001; Fig. 6; Additional file 6: Fig. S6). Of note, in lungs numbers of apoptotic cells did not differ in carvacrol treated C. jejuni infected and naive mice (n.s.; Fig. 6c, Additional file 6: Fig. S6C).
We next measured pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion in respective ex vivo biopsies. At day 6 p.i., lower IFN-γ as well as TNF concentrations could be assessed in the liver of carvacrol as compared to PLC treated mice (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively; Fig. 7a, b), which also held true for renal IFN-γ protein levels (p < 0.05; Fig. 7c), but not TNF concentration (n.s.; Fig. 7d). Moreover, IFN-γ concentrations increased upon C. jejuni infection in the lungs of PLC (p < 0.05; Fig. 7e), but not carvacrol treated mice (n.s.; Fig. 7e), whereas elevated pulmonary TNF levels could be obtained at day 6 p.i., irrespective of the treatment regimen (p < 0.05; Fig. 7f). Remarkably, the inflammation-dampening effects of carvacrol in C. jejuni infected mice could also be observed systemically as indicated by lower increases in pro-inflammatory mediators such as IFN-γ, TNF, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and IL-6 measured in serum samples taken from carvacrol as compared to PLC treated mice at day 6 p.i. (p < 0.05–0.005; Fig. 8). Hence, carvacrol treatment dampens C. jejuni induced pro-inflammatory responses also in extra-intestinal and even systemic compartments.
Bacterial translocation into extra-intestinal including systemic compartments of carvacrol treated mice following C. jejuni infection
We finally addressed whether carvacrol treatment had an impact on the translocation of viable pathogens originating from the gastrointestinal tract to extra-intestinal including systemic tissue sites. Whereas C. jejuni could be cultured from MLN of PLC and carvacrol treated mice in 45.8 and 42.1% of cases at day 6 p.i., respectively (Fig. 9a), pathogenic translocation rates were lower in spleens (15.8% vs. 20.8%), livers (5.3% vs. 8.3%), kidneys (0% vs. 8.3%) and lungs (0% vs 12.5%) taken from mice of the carvacrol versus PLC cohorts (Fig. 9b–e). Of note, all blood cultures were C. jejuni negative (Fig. 9f). Hence, carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni infected mice is accompanied with less frequent translocation of viable pathogens from the intestinal tract to extra-intestinal compartments.
Discussion
In the European Union the annual financial burden to the public health systems and to loss of individual health and productivity due to foodborne C. jejuni infections are estimated to account for 2.4 billion Euro [33]. Given the progressive emergence of human campylobacteriosis, identification of non-synthetic antibiotic molecules that exert both, potent anti-Campylobacter and anti-inflammatory effects in infected individuals is highly appreciable in order to combat pathogen-induced morbidities. The phenolic compound carvacrol has been shown to exert antimicrobial activities by increasing the membrane permeability of Gram-negative bacteria including C. jejuni [34] and thus, represents a promising option to replace conventionally used synthetic antibiotics for lowering the C. jejuni burden in livestock animals and avoiding the development of antibiotic resistant C. jejuni strains. In fact, the European Union has approved carvacrol as animal food supplement on the basis of results derived from carvacrol treatment studies in chicken farms in order to reduce the abundance of Campylobacter in poultry farming and meat production [35]. Notably, carvacrol constitutes a major component of oregano and thyme oils representing a “generally as safe recognized” phytoherbal compound [36–40] that has been pharmaceutically approved for the treatment of gastrointestinal morbidities in humans [41, 42]. However, scientifically validated data regarding carvacrol application against C. jejuni induced enterocolitis in humans are scarce.
In the present pre-clinical intervention study we therefore applied a well-established clinical C. jejuni infection model of acute campylobacteriosis by using secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice which display the clinical hallmarks of severe campylobacteriosis seen in human patients. In our study, we applied carvacrol via the drinking water in a concentration of 500 mg/l that was more than three times higher than the MIC90 value of 150 mg/l that had been determined in 20 C. jejuni insolates before. Carvacrol treatment starting 4 days prior murine infection could sufficiently lower intestinal C. jejuni burdens up to 2 orders of magnitude until day 6 p.i. The antimicrobial properties of carvacrol directed against food-borne pathogens such as C. jejuni [26, 29, 30, 37] Salmonella spp. [37, 43–45], Escherichia coli O157:H7 [46] and Bacillus cereus [47, 48] have been shown in vitro recently. Synthetic carvacrol was, however, more effective against Gram-negative bacteria than against Gram-positive species [49].
Remarkably, carvacrol treatment alleviated C. jejuni induced symptoms of campylobacteriosis including wasting and bloody diarrhea. Previous in vitro studies revealed that carvacrol reduced C. jejuni virulence by inhibition of motility, cell attachment, tissue invasion and toxin production and disrupted bacterial ATP production leading to bacterial cell death [22–27, 29, 30, 50]. In addition, carvacrol reduced Campylobacter colonization in chicken in vivo and inhibited biofilm formation [26]. Ameliorated murine campylobacteriosis was further characterized by less distinct C. jejuni induced apoptosis in both, colonic and ileal epithelia, whereas intestinal cell proliferative/regenerative properties counteracting pathogen-induced cell damage were enhanced upon carvacrol treatment. Furthermore, carvacrol application dampened intestinal pro-inflammatory immune responses upon C. jejuni infection as indicated by less abundance of T and B lymphocytes in the mucosa and lamina propria of both, the large and the small intestines and lower concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators including TNF and IL-6 in the intestinal tract and further, in the MLN draining the infected intestines. These results are supported by recent in vitro studies showing that carvacrol treatment of both, stimulated dendritic cells and macrophages resulted in less distinct TNF and IFN-γ secretion [51], whereas carvacrol could down-regulate lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-6 in broilers [52].
Notably, the inflammation-dampening properties of exogenous carvacrol was not restricted to the intestinal tract, but could also be observed in extra-intestinal organs such as liver, kidneys and lungs as indicated by less distinct apoptosis and secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF and IFN-γ in respective organs. In support, carvacrol has been shown to improve survival during LPS-induced endotoxinemia and acute lung injury in mice and to result in less distinct secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF and IL-6 [53].
Strikingly, the potent campylobacteriosis ameliorating effects upon carvacrol treatment could also be assessed systemically given that serum concentrations of TNF, IFN-γ, MCP-1 and IL-6 were lower in carvacrol as compared to PLC treated C. jejuni infected mice. Of note, translocation of viable pathogens from the intestinal tract to extra-intestinal organs occurred less frequently in the carvacrol versus PLC cohort. Even though all blood cultures were C. jejuni negative, one needs to take further into account that soluble bacterial molecules such as LOS and other cell wall constituents might have been transported via the circulation and been responsible for the deleterious outcome of severe campylobacteriosis in PLC control mice.
Overall, it is tempting to speculate that the observed disease-ameliorating properties of carvacrol are due to an orchestrated sum effect of distinct anti-inflammatory features of the compound: (i) lower intestinal pathogen loads and hence, (ii) less LOS exposure less distinctly inducing pro-inflammatory mediator secretion, (iii) hypothetical direct anti-LOS effect of carvacrol, (iv) interfering with distinct C. jejuni virulence factors by blocking motility, adhesion, invasion, LOS expression, leading to (v) less recruitment of immune cells resulting in (vi) less secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators, (vii) less cytotoxicity including apoptosis, (viii) more counter-regulatory cell proliferation/regeneration, (ix) less pathogenic translocation, and (x) less extra-intestinal including (xi) systemic immune responses.
Taken together these beneficial effects result in a significant amelioration of disease and better overall clinical outcome of mice in the clinical infection model for human campylobacteriosis.
Conclusion
The lowered C. jejuni loads and alleviated symptoms observed in the here applied clinical murine model for human campylobacteriosis highlight the application of carvacrol as a promising option not only for the treatment of campylobacteriosis in humans and hence, for prevention of post-infectious sequelae, but also for the reduction of C. jejuni colonization in lifestock animals.
Methods
Determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations of carvacrol
For determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of carvacrol, 20 C. jejuni isolates including the reference strain 81–176 used for infection of mice (see below) were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibility applying the broth microdilution method. Procedures regarding inoculum density, growth medium, incubation time and conditions were performed in accordance with the recommendations given in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document VET01-Ed5. Twofold serial dilutions ranging from 0.008 to 8.0 mmol/l (1–1202 µg/ml) for carvacrol were tested. Stock solutions were prepared in Mueller–Hinton broth and adjusted to pH 7.3. The C. jejuni reference strain DSM 4688 was used for quality control purposes. The MIC value of the reference strain was tested in advance in three independent experiments using the broth microdilution method and the broth macrodilution method.
Generation of secondary abiotic mice
IL-10−/− mice (female and male, all in C57BL/6j background) were reared under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions in the same unit of the Forschungseinrichtungen für Experimentelle Medizin (FEM, Charité—University Medicine Berlin). In order to counteract physiological colonization resistance and thus assure stable gastrointestinal C. jejuni colonization [13], secondary abiotic mice with a depleted gut microbiota were generated as described earlier [13, 54]. In brief, immediately post weaning 3-week-old mice were subjected to a 10-week course of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment by adding ampicillin plus sulbactam (1 g/l; Ratiopharm, Germany), vancomycin (500 mg/l; Cell Pharm, Germany), ciprofloxacin (200 mg/l; Bayer Vital, Germany), imipenem (250 mg/l; MSD, Germany) and metronidazole (1 g/l; Fresenius, Germany) to the autoclaved drinking water (ad libitum). Two days before pathogenic challenge the antibiotic cocktail was replaced by autoclaved tap water to assure antibiotic washout.
Carvacrol treatment
Four days prior C. jejuni infection treatment with carvacrol (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany; daily dose of 100 mg carvacrol per kg body weight) was initiated by dissolving the compound in Tween 80 (0.2% v/v) to a final concentration of 500 mg/l autoclaved tap water (ad libitum). Placebo control mice received Tween 80 only.
Campylobacter jejuni infection
Twelve-week old mice were perorally challenged with 109 colony forming units (CFU) of the highly pathogenic C. jejuni reference strain 81–176 by gavage (in a total volume of 0.3 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS), Gibco, Life Technologies, UK). Animals were continuously maintained in a sterile environment (autoclaved food and drinking water or sterile antibiotic cocktail) and handled under strict aseptic conditions in order to avoid contaminations.
Clinical conditions
Before and after Campylobacter jejuni infection clinical conditions of mice were assessed on a daily basis applying a standardized cumulative clinical score (maximum 12 points) addressing the abundance of blood in feces (0: no blood; 2: microscopic detection of blood by the Guajac method using Haemoccult, Beckman Coulter/PCD, Germany; 4: macroscopic blood visible), diarrhea (0: formed feces; 2: pasty feces; 4: liquid feces), and the clinical aspect (0: normal; 2: ruffled fur, less locomotion; 4: isolation, severely compromised locomotion, pre-final aspect) as described earlier [55].
Sampling procedures
At day 6 p.i., mice were sacrificed by isofluran inhalation (Abbott, Germany). Luminal gastrointestinal samples (i.e., from stomach, duodenum, ileum and colon) and ex vivo biopsies were taken from colon, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), liver, kidneys, lungs, and spleen under sterile conditions. Intestinal samples were collected from each mouse in parallel for microbiological, immunohistopathological and immunological analyses. The absolute colonic lengths were measured with a ruler (in cm).
Pathogenic colonization and translocation
Campylobacter jejuni loads were surveyed in fecal samples over time p.i., and upon necropsy in luminal samples taken from the stomach, duodenum, ileum and colon as well as in homogenates of ex vivo biopsies derived from MLN, spleen, liver, kidney and lung as well as in cardiac blood samples by culture as described previously [13, 56]. In brief, intraluminal gastrointestinal samples and respective ex vivo biopsies were homogenized in sterile PBS with a pistil and serial dilutions plated onto karmali agar (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany) and incubated in a microaerophilic atmosphere for at least 48 h. Cardiac blood (0.2 ml) was immediately streaked onto karmali agar plates. The detection limit of viable pathogens was approximately 100 CFU/g.
Immunohistochemistry
In situ immunohistochemical analyses were performed in ex vivo biopsies derived from colon, ileum, liver, kidneys, and lungs that had been immediately fixed in 5% formalin and embedded in paraffin as stated elsewhere [32, 57–59]. In brief, in order to detect apoptotic epithelial cells, proliferation epithelial cells, T lymphocytes, and B lymphocytes, paraffin sections (5 μm) were stained with primary antibodies directed against cleaved caspase 3 (Asp175, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA, 1:200), Ki67 (TEC3, Dako, Denmark, 1:100), CD3 (#N1580, Dako, 1:10), and B220 (No. 14–0452-81, eBioscience; 1:200), respectively. After incubation with the primary antibody (30 min), sections were incubated for another 30 min with the respective secondary antibody (for anti-cleaved caspase 3 and anti-CD3 staining: biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit antibody; for anti-Ki67 and anti-B220 staining: biotinylated rabbit anti-rat antibody; all purchased from Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). The Streptavidin–Alkaline Phosphatase Kit (Dako) using Fast Red as chromogen was applied as detection system. Negative controls were generated in samples in which the respective primary antibody had been omitted. Positively stained cells were then examined by light microscopy (magnification 100× and 400×), and for each mouse the average number of respective positively stained cells was determined within at least six high power fields (HPF, 0.287 mm2, 400× magnification) by a blinded independent investigator.
Pro-inflammatory mediators
Colonic and ileal ex vivo biopsies were cut longitudinally and washed in PBS. Ex vivo biopsies derived from liver (approximately 1 cm3), kidney (one half after longitudinal cut), lung, MLN (3–4 lymph nodes) or strips of approximately 1 cm2 colonic or ileal tissues were placed in 24-flat-bottom well culture plates (Nunc, Germany) containing 500 μl serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, life technologies, UK) supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml; PAA Laboratories, Germany). After 18 h at 37 °C, culture supernatants and serum samples were tested for IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, and MCP-1 by the Mouse Inflammation Cytometric Bead Assay (CBA; BD Biosciences, Germany) on a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations were measured in serum samples. NO concentrations were assessed by the Griess reaction [54, 60].
Statistical analysis
Medians and levels of significance were determined using Mann–Whitney test (GraphPad Prism v7, USA) as indicated. Two-sided probability (p) values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Experiments were reproduced three times.
Additional files
Acknowledgements
We thank Alexandra Bittroff-Leben, Ines Puschendorf, Ulrike Fiebiger, Sigri Klove, Gernot Reifenberger, and the staff of the animal research facility at Charité - University Medicine Berlin for excellent technical assistance and animal breeding. We further thank Dr. Anja A. Kühl (Department of Medicine I for Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology/Research Center ImmunoSciences (RCIS), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin) for taking representative photomicrographs of immunhistochemically stained paraffin sections. We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Abbreviations
- ATP
adenosine triphosphate
- CARVA
carvacrol
- CBA
Cytometric Bead Array
- CFU
colony forming units
- HPF
high power field
- IFN
interferon
- IL
interleukin
- LOS
lipooligosaccharide
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- MCP-1
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- MIC
minimal inhibitory concentration
- MLN
mesenteric lymph nodes
- NO
nitric oxide
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- PLC
placebo
- p.i.
post-infection
- SPF
specific pathogen free
- TLR
Toll-like Receptor
- TNF
tumor necrosis factor
Authors’ contributions
SM: Performed experiments, co-wrote paper. AMS, CK, EL: Performed experiments, analyzed data. UE: Performed experiments. SK: Performed experiments, analyzed data, co-edited paper. SB: Provided advice in experimental design, critically discussed results, co-edited paper. MMH: Designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported from the German Federal Ministries of Education and Research (BMBF) in frame of the zoonoses research consortium PAC-Campylobacter to MMH, SM, SB (IP7/01KI1725D), and to SK, CK, ET (IP5/01Kl1725C) and from the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy following a resolution of the German National Parliament, Deutscher Bundestag (ZIM, ZF4117908 AJ8) to SB and MMH.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
In vivo experiments were conducted in accordance with the European Guidelines for animal welfare (2010/63/EU) after approval by the commission for animal experiments headed by the “Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales” (LaGeSo, Berlin, registration numbers G0172/16 and G0247/16). Clinical conditions of mice were assessed twice a day.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Stefan Bereswill and Markus M. Heimesaat contributed equally to this work
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13099-019-0343-4.
References
- 1.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jantsch J, Chikkaballi D, Hensel M. Cellular aspects of immunity to intracellular Salmonella enterica. Immunol Rev. 2011;240(1):185–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00981.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Humphrey T, O'Brien S, Madsen M. Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;117(3):237–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Možina SS, Kurinčič M, Klančnik A, Mavri A. Campylobacter and its multi-resistance in the food chain. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011;22(2):91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Luangtongkum T, Jeon B, Han J, Plummer P, Logue CM, Zhang Q. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter: emergence, transmission and persistence. Future Microbiol. 2009;4(2):189–200. doi: 10.2217/17460913.4.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Altekruse SF, Tollefson LK. Human campylobacteriosis: a challenge for the veterinary profession. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223(4):445–452. doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kist M, Bereswill S. Campylobacter jejuni. Contrib Microbiol. 2001;8:150–165. doi: 10.1159/000060405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Walker RI, Caldwell MB, Lee EC, Guerry P, Trust TJ, Ruiz-Palacios GM. Pathophysiology of Campylobacter enteritis. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50(1):81–94. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.1.81-94.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Backert Steffen, Tegtmeyer Nicole, Cróinín Tadhg Ó, Boehm Manja, Heimesaat Markus M. Campylobacter. 2017. Human campylobacteriosis; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nachamkin I. Chronic effects of Campylobacter infection. Microbes Infect. 2002;4(4):399–403. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01553-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Allos BM. Association between Campylobacter infection and Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(Suppl 2):S125–S128. doi: 10.1086/513783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haag LM, Fischer A, Otto B, Plickert R, Kuhl AA, Gobel UB, et al. Campylobacter jejuni induces acute enterocolitis in gnotobiotic IL-10−/− mice via Toll-like-receptor-2 and -4 signaling. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bereswill S, Fischer A, Plickert R, Haag LM, Otto B, Kuhl AA, et al. Novel murine infection models provide deep insights into the "menage a trois" of Campylobacter jejuni, microbiota and host innate immunity. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):e20953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.John CM, Phillips NJ, Stein DC, Jarvis GA. Innate immune response to lipooligosaccharide: pivotal regulator of the pathobiology of invasive Neisseria meningitidis infections. Pathog Dis. 2017;75(3):ftx030. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mandrell RE, Apicella MA. Lipo-oligosaccharides (LOS) of mucosal pathogens: molecular mimicry and host-modification of LOS. Immunobiology. 1993;187(3–5):382–402. doi: 10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80352-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gutierrez-Del-Rio I, Fernandez J, Lombo F. Plant nutraceuticals as antimicrobial agents in food preservation: terpenoids, polyphenols and thiols. Int J Atimicrob Agents. 2018;52(3):309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Suntres ZE, Coccimiglio J, Alipour M. The bioactivity and toxicological actions of carvacrol. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(3):304–318. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.653458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Friedman M. Chemistry and multibeneficial bioactivities of carvacrol (4-isopropyl-2-methylphenol), a component of essential oils produced by aromatic plants and spices. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(31):7652–7670. doi: 10.1021/jf5023862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Di Pasqua R, Betts G, Hoskins N, Edwards M, Ercolini D, Mauriello G. Membrane toxicity of antimicrobial compounds from essential oils. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(12):4863–4870. doi: 10.1021/jf0636465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Di Pasqua R, Hoskins N, Betts G, Mauriello G. Changes in membrane fatty acids composition of microbial cells induced by addiction of thymol, carvacrol, limonene, cinnamaldehyde, and eugenol in the growing media. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54(7):2745–2749. doi: 10.1021/jf052722l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Helander IM, Alakomi H-L, Latva-Kala K, Mattila-Sandholm T, Pol I, Smid EJ, et al. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram-negative bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46(9):3590–3595. doi: 10.1021/jf980154m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gill AO, Holley RA. Inhibition of membrane bound ATPases of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes by plant oil aromatics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;111(2):170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gill AO, Holley RA. Disruption of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Latobacillus sakei cellular membranes by plant oil aromatics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;108(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ultee A, Kets EP, Smid EJ. Mechanisms of action of carvacrol on the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(10):4606–4610. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.10.4606-4610.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Allaoua M, Etienne P, Noirot V, Carayon JL, Tene N, Bonnafe E, et al. Pharmacokinetic and antimicrobial activity of a new carvacrol-based product against a human pathogen Campylobacter jejuni . J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125(4):1162–1174. doi: 10.1111/jam.13915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kelly C, Gundogdu O, Pircalabioru G, Cean A, Scates P, Linton M, et al. The in vitro and in vivo effect of carvacrol in preventing campylobacter infection, colonization and in improving productivity of chicken broilers. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017;14(6):341–349. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2016.2265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arsi K, Donoghue AM, Venkitanarayanan K, Kollanoor-Johny A, Fanatico AC, Blore PJ, et al. The efficacy of the natural plant extracts, thymol and carvacrol against campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens. J Food Safety. 2014;34(4):321–325. doi: 10.1111/jfs.12129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kollanoor Johny A, Darre MJ, Donoghue AM, Donoghue DJ, Venkitanarayanan K. Antibacterial effect of trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, carvacrol, and thymol on Salmonella enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni in chicken cecal contents in vitro. TJ Appl Poult Res. 2010;19(3):237–244. doi: 10.3382/japr.2010-00181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Upadhyay A, Arsi K, Wagle BR, Upadhyaya I, Shrestha S, Donoghue AM, et al. Trans-cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, and eugenol reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization factors and expression of virulence genes in vitro. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:713. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.van Alphen LB, Burt SA, Veenendaal AK, Bleumink-Pluym NM, van Putten JP. The natural antimicrobial carvacrol inhibits Campylobacter jejuni motility and infection of epithelial cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Heimesaat MM, Grundmann U, Alutis ME, Fischer A, Bereswill S. Absence of nucleotide-oligomerization-domain-2 is associated with less distinct disease in Campylobacter jejuni infected secondary abiotic IL-10 deficient mice. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:322. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heimesaat MM, Lugert R, Fischer A, Alutis M, Kuhl AA, Zautner AE, et al. Impact of Campylobacter jejuni cj0268c knockout mutation on intestinal colonization, translocation, and induction of immunopathology in gnotobiotic IL-10 deficient mice. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e90148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Health EPoP Scientific opinion on the risk to plant health of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri and Xanthomonas citri pv. aurantifolii for the EU territory. EFSA J. 2014;12(2):3556. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.La Storia A, Ercolini D, Marinello F, Di Pasqua R, Villani F, Mauriello G. Atomic force microscopy analysis shows surface structure changes in carvacrol-treated bacterial cells. Res Microbiol. 2011;162(2):164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Additives EPanel o, Feed PoSuiA. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos MdL, Christensen H, et al. Safety and efficacy of an essential oil of Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (Link) leetsw. for all poultry species. EFSA J. 2014;17(4):e05653. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aumeeruddy-Elalfi Z, Ismael IS, Hosenally M, Zengin G, Mahomoodally MF. Essential oils from tropical medicinal herbs and food plants inhibit biofilm formation in vitro and are non-cytotoxic to human cells. 3 Biotech. 2018;8(9):395. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1413-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ozogul Y, Kuley E, Ucar Y, Ozogul F. Antimicrobial impacts of essential oils on food borne-pathogens. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2015;7(1):53–61. doi: 10.2174/2212798407666150615112153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moore-Neibel K, Gerber C, Patel J, Friedman M, Ravishankar S. Antimicrobial activity of lemongrass oil against Salmonella enterica on organic leafy greens. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;112(3):485–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Barker SC, Altman PM. A randomised, assessor blind, parallel group comparative efficacy trial of three products for the treatment of head lice in children-melaleuca oil and lavender oil, pyrethrins and piperonyl butoxide, and a "suffocation" product. BMC Dermatol. 2010;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-10-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Klancnik A, Guzej B, Kolar MH, Abramovic H, Mozina SS. In vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of commercial rosemary extract formulations. J Food Prot. 2009;72(8):1744–1752. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.8.1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sharifi-Rad M, Varoni EM, Iriti M, Martorell M, Setzer WN, Del Mar CM, et al. Carvacrol and human health: a comprehensive review. Phytother Res. 2018;32(9):1675–1687. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baser KH. Biological and pharmacological activities of carvacrol and carvacrol bearing essential oils. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(29):3106–3119. doi: 10.2174/138161208786404227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Beaubrun JJ, Addy N, Keltner Z, Farris S, Ewing L, Gopinath G, et al. Evaluation of the impact of varied carvacrol concentrations on Salmonella recovery in oregano and how corn oil can minimize the effect of carvacrol during preenrichment. J Food Prot. 2018;81(6):977–985. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Alves Coelho Trevisan D, Fiori da Silva A, Negri M, Alves de Abreu Filho B, Junior M, Patussi E, et al. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of carvacrol against Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium. 2018.
- 45.Engel JB, Heckler C, Tondo EC, Daroit DJ, da Silva Malheiros P. Antimicrobial activity of free and liposome-encapsulated thymol and carvacrol against Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus adhered to stainless steel. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;252:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Obaidat MM, Frank JF. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the intact and damaged portions of lettuce and spinach leaves by using allyl isothiocyanate, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde in vapor phase. J Food Prot. 2009;72(10):2046–2055. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.10.2046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ultee A, Slump RA, Steging G, Smid EJ. Antimicrobial activity of carvacrol toward Bacillus cereus on rice. J Food Prot. 2000;63(5):620–624. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-63.5.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ultee A, Smid EJ. Influence of carvacrol on growth and toxin production by Bacillus cereus. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;64(3):373–378. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00480-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pesavento G, Calonico C, Bilia AR, Barnabei M, Calesini F, Addona R, et al. Antibacterial activity of Oregano, Rosmarinus and Thymus essential oils against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes in beef meatballs. Food Control. 2015;54:188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.01.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;94(3):223–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Amirghofran Z, Ahmadi H, Karimi MH, Kalantar F, Gholijani N, Malek-Hosseini Z. In vitro inhibitory effects of thymol and carvacrol on dendritic cell activation and function. Pharm Biol. 2016;54(7):1125–1132. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2015.1055579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu SD, Song MH, Yun W, Lee JH, Kim HB, Cho JH. Effect of carvacrol essential oils on immune response and inflammation-related genes expression in broilers challenged by lipopolysaccharide. Poult Sci. 2019;98(5):2026–2033. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Feng X, Jia A. Protective effect of carvacrol on acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. Inflammation. 2014;37(4):1091–1101. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-9833-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heimesaat MM, Bereswill S, Fischer A, Fuchs D, Struck D, Niebergall J, et al. Gram-negative bacteria aggravate murine small intestinal Th1-type immunopathology following oral infection with Toxoplasma gondii. J Immunol. 2006;177(12):8785–8795. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.12.8785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Heimesaat MM, Alutis M, Grundmann U, Fischer A, Tegtmeyer N, Bohm M, et al. The role of serine protease HtrA in acute ulcerative enterocolitis and extra-intestinal immune responses during Campylobacter jejuni infection of gnotobiotic IL-10 deficient mice. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:77. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Heimesaat MM, Haag LM, Fischer A, Otto B, Kuhl AA, Gobel UB, et al. Survey of extra-intestinal immune responses in asymptomatic long-term Campylobacter jejuni-infected mice. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2013;3(3):174–182. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.3.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alutis ME, Grundmann U, Fischer A, Hagen U, Kuhl AA, Gobel UB, et al. The role of gelatinases in Campylobacter jejuni infection of gnotobiotic mice. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2015;5(4):256–267. doi: 10.1556/1886.2015.00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alutis ME, Grundmann U, Hagen U, Fischer A, Kuhl AA, Gobel UB, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 mediates intestinal immunopathogenesis in Campylobacter jejuni-infected infant mice. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2015;5(3):188–198. doi: 10.1556/1886.2015.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Heimesaat MM, Nogai A, Bereswill S, Plickert R, Fischer A, Loddenkemper C, et al. MyD88/TLR9 mediated immunopathology and gut microbiota dynamics in a novel murine model of intestinal graft-versus-host disease. Gut. 2010;59(8):1079–1087. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.197434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bryan NS, Grisham MB. Methods to detect nitric oxide and its metabolites in biological samples. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43(5):645–657. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.