Skip to main content
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques logoLink to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
. 2019 Aug 14;9(3):e26. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083

Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Fixed Bearing Implant

Philip Winnock de Grave 1,, Thomas Luyckx 1, Alexander Ryckaert 1, Jan Noyez 1, Paul Gunst 1, Luc Van den Daelen 1
PMCID: PMC6948995  PMID: 32021723

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty in isolated medial arthritis. UKA restores native tibial and femoral joint surfaces and corrects pre-disease limb alignment, by which natural knee biomechanics are restored, ensuring effective functional recovery. Proper patient selection and accurate surgical technique contribute to good functional outcome and long-term survival. The key steps of the procedure (as well as multiple tips and tricks) are demonstrated in the video article: (1) preoperative assessment and planning; (2) patient positioning and setup; (3) exposure; (4) instrument options and surgical technique; (5) distal femoral resection; (6) proximal tibial resection; (7) assessment of alignment and gaps; (8) finishing the femur—sizing, position, and posterior resection; (9) finishing the tibia—sizing and position; (10) trialing the implant; (11) implanting final components—cementing technique; (12) closure; and (13) rehabilitation. Following these surgical steps and principles will lead to excellent functional long-term results with a low revision rate and a minimum of complications.


Download video file (7.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (22.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (2.5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (1.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (7.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (16.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (2.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (17MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (32.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (21.9MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (14.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (11.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (20MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (25.1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (4.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (4.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1
Download video file (6.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00083.vid1

Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2792-9.

Disclosure: The authors indicated that no external funding was received for any aspect of this work. On the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which are provided with the online version of the article, one or more of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author had a relevant financial relationship in the biomedical arena outside the submitted work (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A258).

References

  • 1.Winnock de Grave P, Barbier J, Luyckx T, Ryckaert A, Gunst P, Van den Daelen L. Outcomes of fixed-bearing, medial, cemented, unicondylar knee arthroplasty design: survival analysis and functional score of 460 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2018. September;33(9):2792-2799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. January;468(1):57-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Flannery NM. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 2):71-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. May;290:259-68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. January;470(1):45-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cobb J. Arthroplasty registries, patient safety and outlier surgeons: the case for change. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015. December;81(4):594-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwab PE, Lavand’homme P, Yombi JC, Thienpont E. Lower blood loss after unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. December;23(12):3494-500. Epub 2014 Jul 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siman H, Kamath AF, Carrillo N, Harmsen WS, Pagnano MW, Sierra RJ. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 years: comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates. J Arthroplasty. 2017. June;32(6):1792-7. Epub 2017 Jan 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cartier P, Cheaib S. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. 2-10 years of follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2(2):157-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Argenson JN, Blanc G, Aubaniac JM, Parratte S. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. May 15;95(10):905-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee. 2004. October;11(5):357-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Romagnoli S, Marullo M, Massaro M, Rustemi E, D’Amario F, Corbella M. Bi-unicompartmental and combined uni plus patellofemoral replacement: indications and surgical technique. Joints. 2015. June 8;3(1):42-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parratte S, Ollivier M, Lunebourg A, Abdel MP, Argenson JN. Long-term results of compartmental arthroplasties of the knee: long term results of partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015. October;97-B(10)(Suppl A):9-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vasso M, Del Regno C, D’Amelio A, Viggiano D, Corona K, Schiavone Panni A. Minor varus alignment provides better results than neutral alignment in medial UKA. Knee. 2015. March;22(2):117-21. Epub 2014 Dec 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chatellard R, Sauleau V, Colmar M, Robert H, Raynaud G, Brilhault J; Société d’Orthopédie et de Traumatologie de l’Ouest (SOO). Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013. June;99(4)(Suppl):S219-25. Epub 2013 Apr 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiik AV, Manning V, Strachan RK, Amis AA, Cobb JP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013. October;28(9)(Suppl):176-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dalury DF, Fisher DA, Adams MJ, Gonzales RA. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Orthopedics. 2009. April;32(4): orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=38057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shankar S, Tetreault MW, Jegier BJ, Andersson GB, Della Valle CJ. A cost comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016. December;23(6):1016-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vasso M, Del Regno C, Perisano C, D’Amelio A, Corona K, Schiavone Panni A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective: ten year results. Int Orthop. 2015. December;39(12):2341-6. Epub 2015 Jul 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES