Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2017 Jul 2;77(11):1179–1186. doi: 10.1002/pros.23369

Table 3.

Risk categories based on evolving SNP sets and PCa detection rate in the placebo arm using GRS cutoff value of 1.5.

Set of SNPs No. (%) of subjects
% of PCa
% of high-grade PCa
Remain lower Reclassified Remain higher Remain lower Reclassified Remain higher P-trend Remain lower Reclassified Remain higher P-trend
17 vs. 34 SNPs 1168 (71.05%) 232(14.11%) 244 (14.84%) 20.98 34.91 34.43 7.80×10−8 5.91 7.76 8.61 0.086
34 vs. 51 SNPs 1172 (71.29%) 198 (12.04%) 274 (16.67%) 21.42 27.27 38.32 5.58×10−9 5.63 8.59 9.12 0.019
51 vs. 68 SNPs 1213 (73.78%) 134 (8.15%) 297 (18.07%) 21.93 27.61 36.03 3.84×10−7 5.61 10.45 8.75 0.020
17, 34, 51, and 68 SNPsa 1053 (64.05%) 428 (26.03%) 163 (9.91%) 20.8 29.67 39.26 1.12×10−8 5.60 7.71 9.82 0.021

PCa: prostate cancer; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.

a

Reclassification of patient risk based on any GRS. For example, 1053 (64.05%) patients had lower risk for all of the four GRSs, 428 (26.03%) had reclassification for any of the GRSs, and 163 (9.91%) had higher risk for all of the four GRSs.