Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2020 Jan 8;7:6. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0344-7

A global database for metacommunity ecology, integrating species, traits, environment and space

Alienor Jeliazkov 1,2,, Darko Mijatovic 1, Stéphane Chantepie 3, Nigel Andrew 4, Raphaël Arlettaz 5, Luc Barbaro 6,7, Nadia Barsoum 8, Alena Bartonova 9,10, Elena Belskaya 11, Núria Bonada 12, Anik Brind’Amour 13, Rodrigo Carvalho 14,15, Helena Castro 16, Damian Chmura 17, Philippe Choler 18, Karen Chong-Seng 19, Daniel Cleary 20,21, Anouk Cormont 22, William Cornwell 23, Ramiro de Campos 24, Nicole de Voogd 25,26, Sylvain Doledec 27, Joshua Drew 28, Frank Dziock 29, Anthony Eallonardo 30, Melanie J Edgar 31, Fábio Farneda 32,33,34, Domingo Flores Hernandez 35, Cédric Frenette-Dussault 36, Guillaume Fried 37, Belinda Gallardo 38, Heloise Gibb 39, Thiago Gonçalves-Souza 40, Janet Higuti 24, Jean-Yves Humbert 5, Boris R Krasnov 41, Eric Le Saux 7, Zoe Lindo 42, Adria Lopez-Baucells 33,34,43, Elizabeth Lowe 44, Bryndis Marteinsdottir 45, Koen Martens 46,47, Peter Meffert 48, Andres Mellado-Díaz 49,50, Myles H M Menz 51, Christoph F J Meyer 33,34,52, Julia Ramos Miranda 35, David Mouillot 53, Alessandro Ossola 44, Robin Pakeman 54, Sandrine Pavoine 7, Burak Pekin 55, Joan Pino 56, Arnaud Pocheville 57, Francesco Pomati 58, Peter Poschlod 59, Honor C Prentice 60, Oliver Purschke 61, Valerie Raevel 61, Triin Reitalu 62, Willem Renema 25, Ignacio Ribera 63, Natalie Robinson 64,65, Bjorn Robroek 66, Ricardo Rocha 33,34, Sen-Her Shieh 67, Rebecca Spake 68, Monika Staniaszek-Kik 69, Michal Stanko 70, Francisco Leonardo Tejerina-Garro 71,72, Cajo ter Braak 73, Mark C Urban 74, Roel van Klink 1, Sébastien Villéger 53, Ruut Wegman 22, Martin J Westgate 75, Jonas Wolff 44, Jan Żarnowiec 17, Maxim Zolotarev 11, Jonathan M Chase 1,2
PMCID: PMC6949231  PMID: 31913312

Abstract

The use of functional information in the form of species traits plays an important role in explaining biodiversity patterns and responses to environmental changes. Although relationships between species composition, their traits, and the environment have been extensively studied on a case-by-case basis, results are variable, and it remains unclear how generalizable these relationships are across ecosystems, taxa and spatial scales. To address this gap, we collated 80 datasets from trait-based studies into a global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space; “CESTES”. Each dataset includes four matrices: species community abundances or presences/absences across multiple sites, species trait information, environmental variables and spatial coordinates of the sampling sites. The CESTES database is a live database: it will be maintained and expanded in the future as new datasets become available. By its harmonized structure, and the diversity of ecosystem types, taxonomic groups, and spatial scales it covers, the CESTES database provides an important opportunity for synthetic trait-based research in community ecology.

Subject terms: Community ecology, Macroecology, Biodiversity


Measurement(s) species abundance • species trait • environmental feature • latitude • longitude
Technology Type(s) digital curation
Factor Type(s) year of data collection • type of ecosystem • level of human disturbance
Sample Characteristic - Environment terrestrial natural environment • fresh water • marine biome • anthropogenic terrestrial biome • natural environment • area of mixed forest • cultivated environment
Sample Characteristic - Location Earth (planet)

Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11317790

Background & Summary

A major challenge in ecology is to understand the processes underlying community assembly and biodiversity patterns across space1,2. Over the three last decades, trait-based research, by taking up this challenge, has drawn increasing interest3, in particular with the aim of predicting biodiversity response to environment. In community ecology, it has been equated to the ‘Holy Grail’ that would allow ecologists to approach the potential processes underlying metacommunity patterns47. In macroecology, it is common to study biodiversity variation through its taxonomic and functional facets along gradients of environmental drivers810. In biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research, trait-based diversity measures complement taxonomic ones to predict ecosystem functions11 offering early-warning signs of ecosystem perturbation12.

The topic of Trait-Environment Relationships (TER) has been extensively studied across the globe and across the tree of life. However, each study deals with a specific system, taxonomic group, and geographic region and uses different methods to assess the relationship between species traits and the environment. As a consequence, we do not know how generalizable apparent relationships are, nor how they vary across ecosystems, realms, and taxonomic groups. In addition, while there is an emerging synthesis about the role of traits for terrestrial plant communities13,14, we know much less about other groups and ecosystem types.

To address these gaps, we introduce the CESTES database - a global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space. This database assembles 80 datasets from studies that analysed empirical multivariate trait-environment relationships between 1996 (the first multivariate study of TER15) and 2018. All considered datasets include four data matrices (Fig. 1): (i) community data (species abundances or presences/absences across multiple sites), (ii) species traits (sensu lato), (iii) environmental variables across sites, and (iv) spatial coordinates. The database is global in extent and covers different taxonomic groups, ecosystem types, levels of human disturbance, and spatial scales (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Structure of the CESTES database. The database includes 80 Excel files for 80 datasets. Each dataset is composed of four matrices of data stored in spreadsheets: comm (species abundances [n = 68] or presences/absences [n = 12]), traits (species traits), envir (environmental variables), and coord (spatial coordinates). Each dataset also includes a DataKey (description of the entries of the Data tables), a Notes sheet (contact information for the dataset, and, when relevant, processing information), a Species list, and a Site list. The grey components can be the original data matrices, and additional information and do not appear in all the datasets, depending on specific needs (see Methods - Data processing section).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Overview of the CESTES database. Upper panel: Map of the 80 dataset locations over the globe (blue spots) (the orange smaller spots represent the 10 ancillary datasets from ceste, the non-spatial supplement of CESTES - see the Methods section); the four coloured polygons represent four datasets that are covering continental extents. The background world map is from OpenStreetMap contributors. Bottom panel: Bar plots and histogram describing the content of the database in terms of: study group, ecological realm, level of human disturbance, and spatial extent of the study.

Several global trait databases already exist or are emerging, such as the Open Traits working group16, the Freshwater Information Platform and its Taxa and Autecology Database for Freshwater Organisms17, the PREDICTS database for Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems18,19, and the TRY20 plant trait database for Quantifying and scaling global plant trait diversity. In comparison to these initiatives, the CESTES database has several unique features. Specifically, it maintains the original matching between the community, environmental, and spatial data that go along with the trait information. Keeping this original matching of the data ensures homogeneity in the data structure and allows for targeted analyses of TER. We include all taxonomic groups for which the appropriate matrices are available including groups poorly represented in most trait compilations (e.g., invertebrates and bats). The trait information is particularly diverse, ranging from life-history and morphological to trophic traits, dispersal abilities and tolerances, and covering various ecological mechanisms. CESTES only includes data where georeferenced coordinates, or relative coordinates of the sampling sites (hereafter: spatial coordinates) and environmental variables are available to enable spatial and scaling community analyses. We prioritized studies with abundance or biomass data (as opposed to presence/absence) to facilitate the calculation of a broad range of biodiversity metrics and the study of different facets of biodiversity. The data available in CESTES are open access without restriction, except via citation of this paper (and any original paper that plays a particularly important role in the analyses). Importantly, the CESTES database is meant to be a live database21: it will be maintained in the future and new datasets will be added as they become available.

The CESTES database aims to significantly contribute to research in biogeography, macroecology (including in complement with phylogenies), community and metacommunity ecology, and biodiversity-ecosystem functioning. On the one hand, the quality of its content and structure will allow meta-analyses and syntheses (e.g., the role of taxonomic and functional diversity in spatial patterns of communities). On the other hand, specific datasets will enable the exploration of new questions on a given group, realm, or type of ecosystem.

Methods

Data compilation

Database scoping

The rationale for developing the CESTES database is generally for the study of TER in relation to metacommunity ecology and/or macroecological questions. As such, we focussed on datasets that were appropriate within the metacommunity or macroecology context (i.e. species assemblages distributed across space) and that focussed on traits to understand biodiversity patterns and responses. This prerequisite led us to identify multivariate trait-based studies as the most relevant and rich source of datasets that could fulfil these two requirements.

Given the complexity that still pertains to trait typology13, we did not restrict ourselves to any specific definition of traits and integrated all possible species characteristics if they were used as “traits” in the original study. We thus included ecophysiological, functional, life-history and biological traits, as well as response and effects traits. CESTES users can select traits according to their study needs.

We identified eligible datasets based on two strategies: 1. Literature search, aiming to initiate the database construction along a structured workflow, 2. Networking, aiming to extend the database and open the sharing possibilities, if the datasets fulfilled the CESTES requirements.

The main condition for dataset eligibility was that the TER was the focus of the study and data use. This ensured that: 1. the trait and the taxonomic information were collected from similar biogeographic areas (minimizing mismatches between the geographic origins of trait and taxonomic data), 2. the sampled sites were associated with contextual environmental information that was relevant to the community and traits under study.

Literature search

We searched for multivariate trait-based studies published between 1996 and 2018 via a systematic literature search on the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core database. Following Leibold & Chase2, we focussed on studies that included (in any of their contents) the following terms (including spelling variations): “RLQ”15 and “fourth-corner”22,23 because both of them are the predominant methods of multivariate trait-based analyses in ecology24. The “RLQ” refers to a co-inertia analysis that summarizes the overall link between the three matrices of species abundances/presences-absences (L), species traits (Q) and environment (R). The “fourth-corner” refers to a permutation analysis of these three matrices that tests individual trait-environment relationships. The use of RLQ and fourth-corner analyses on the datasets ensures that all of them: 1. are multivariate and include both several species, several traits, and several sites (potentially including spatial information) to align with a metacommunity-like structure, 2. have a comparable structure and can be used in comparative analyses and syntheses.

The search query was:

ALL = (“fourth-cornerORfourth cornerORfourthcornerORRLQ”)

This search resulted in 368 papers.

Note that the “fourth corner” term more generally and commonly refers to the widely studied question of the links between trait and environment variations22. Most studies that look at TER, regardless of the method of analysis they use, would often acknowledge the historical background of their question by referring in their paper to the “fourth corner problem”. Consequently, by including the “fourth corner” search term, we identified eligible multivariate datasets that were not necessarily analysed by fourth corner analysis/RLQ, but also by e.g. trait-based generalized linear/additive models25,26. However, although this literature search strategy was well suited for identifying sources of multivariate datasets, it could appear as too specific. In order to relax the constraints due to this specificity, we complemented the data search by a networking strategy (see Networking section).

Scanning strategy

Among the 368 studies resulting from the literature search, we scanned through the Introduction and Methods sections. We selected the studies that used at least the three matrices of species abundances, or presences/absences across multiples sites (“comm”), corresponding environment information across sites (“envir”), and species trait information (“traits”). At first, we prioritized datasets that had spatial coordinates of the sampling sites (“coord”) because the spatial aspect is crucial for metacommunity research2. Spatial coordinates, or the relative locations, could sometimes be reconstructed from the maps presented in the publications. Review and opinion papers, medical and simulation studies were not considered. Following this filter, we identified a subset of 105 eligible datasets.

Networking

The network strategy took place in parallel to the data search and relied on both formal and informal communications and exchanges with colleagues through conferences, workshops, group meetings, emails, etc. This allowed us to identify new data providers, or new datasets that we had not found via the earlier literature search. From this networking, we identified an additional set of 34 potentially eligible datasets.

Dataset collection and request

From the total of 139 eligible datasets, 7.2% of the datasets were available on the online supplementary materials of the publication. These were downloaded and formatted for CESTES’ purposes.

When the datasets were not directly available, we sent a data request via email. In order to launch the CESTES database in a reasonable amount of time, we had to set time limits for the request phase, namely between January and August 2018. As a result, in total 96 authors were contacted, of whom 58% shared their data. In terms of datasets, more than 50% of the eligible datasets were shared and complete (Fig. 3). We also received ‘spontaneous’ datasets that were not part of our initial request, but fulfilled CESTES’ requirements and were thus included in the database. Out of the final complete 80 datasets, 55 were obtained via the literature search, and 25 were obtained from the networking strategy.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Success rates of the data search and request. Barplot showing the percentage of the different outputs from the data collection process. Percentages are calculated from a total of 139 datasets identified as eligible for the CESTES database (based on literature search and networking). Incomplete data mainly refer to the datasets that had no spatial coordinates (ceste), included unsolved issues, or provided insufficient metadata information. (“Agreed but did not share” refers to authors who replied positively to the first request but then never sent their data despite reminders because e.g., they did not find time to prepare the data).

Because we received 10 valuable datasets that had no spatial coordinates, we decided to open the ceste subsection of the CESTES database and populate it with these specific datasets. Some of them could be upgraded to CESTES database when the authors are able to provide the coordinates.

Data processing

Dataset checking, cleaning and formatting

We downloaded and received datasets in various formats (.doc, .pdf, .csv, .RData, .txt, .shp, etc.). Following Broman & Woo27, we harmonized and gathered them in Excel files, one file per dataset. This was the most convenient storage format for creating multiple sheets (community, traits, environment, coordinates), handling heterogeneous types of information, and building metadata specific to each dataset. This storage solution also facilitated visual checking and cleaning of the data records.

CESTES provides both the processed and the unprocessed (i.e. original) datasets. The processed datasets include “comm”, “traits” and “envir”, i.e. with no empty sites, no “ghost” species (i.e. species that are recorded in none of the sites of the study area), and no NAs (Not Available information) in the matrices. NA removal was based on a compromise in the relative frequency of NAs in the rows and columns of each table; when too many sites compared to the sample size (e.g. >50% of the sites) had NAs for one single variable, this variable was removed, whereas when there were some sites (e.g. <30% of the sites) showing NAs for more than one variable, we removed those sites instead of removing the variables. Since CESTES is primarily designed for trait-based analyses, we removed a trait when it included too many NAs across species (i.e. when the trait value was NA for more than 50% of the species in the community). Similarly, we removed species for which no, or too incomplete trait information was available (i.e. when keeping the species would have implied to lose several traits). This was the case for 29 datasets out of the 80. The number of species removed varied from 1 to 209 species (mean = 27, median = 10, sd = 45) that represented from 1 to 72% of the initial species pool (mean = sd = 17%). (Note that this high maximum value is due to only one single dataset where trait data were exceptionally limiting and implied to remove an important number of species without trait information).

When this overall cleaning procedure implied removing any of the species, traits, or environmental variables, we kept the information of the original unprocessed tables within the Excel file in separate sheets. We named these sheets “commfull”, “traitsfull” and “envirfull”, respectively. Thus, the user can either directly use the processed sheets (“comm”, “traits” and “envir”), or the original ones and apply any other filtering strategies. In doing so, we make sure that CESTES is flexible depending on the users’ goals and needs.

Cleaning steps that altered the original dataset (other than formatting) are reported in the “Notes” sheet so that the user can trace back what has been done over the data processing.

When the data included several temporal horizons (sampling years, or seasons treated as different replicates in the original publication), we split them into different datasets for each time horizon to facilitate further analyses. This explains why several datasets can correspond to one single study area (see Online-only Table 1 attached to this manuscript, and the Data Records section).

Online-only Table 1.

Overview of the CESTES database (name of the dataset, location, ecosystem type, spatial extent, number of sites, species, type of community data…).

DatasetName Ecosystem and location Study id Taxonomic group Ecosystem type Extent (km2) Level of human disturbance Sampling date(s)/period nbEnv nbTra nbSpe nbSit Example of traits Example of environmental variables Type of community data References
Bagaria2012 Mediterranean semi-natural mountain grasslands, southern Catalonia, Spain 1 Plants Terrestrial 2000 Semi-natural 2007 8 13 49 29 Seed size|Dispersal type|Corolla type|Flower/pseudanthium size|Resprouting ability after fire Mean annual temperature|Mean annual precipitation|Past patch area|Current patch area|% of patch area reduction number of individuals Bagaria, G., Pino, J., Rodà, F., & Guardiola, M. (2012). Species traits weakly involved in plant responses to landscape properties in Mediterranean grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23(3), 432–442. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01363.x
Barbaro2009a Intensive pine plantations, mosaic forest landscapes in south-western France 2 Beetles Terrestrial 32.16 Forestry 2002–2003 11 12 36 195 European trend|European rarity|Regional rarity|Biogeographical position|Daily activity Clearcut cover/Crop cover|Edge density|Mean patch area|Schrub land cover/ Clearcut cover/Crop cover|Shannon diversity index number of individuals Barbaro, L., & van Halder, I. (2009). Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life‐history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography, 32(2), 321–333. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05546.x
Barbaro2009b Intensive pine plantations, mosaic forest landscapes in south-western France 2 Birds Terrestrial 32.16 Forestry 2002–2003 11 12 53 201 National trend|Foraging technique|Diet|Nest location|Clutch size Clearcut cover/Crop cover|Edge density|Mean patch area|Schrub land cover/ Clearcut cover/Crop cover|Shannon diversity index abundance index Barbaro, L., & van Halder, I. (2009). Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life‐history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography, 32(2), 321–333. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05546.x
Barbaro2012 Fragmented native forests, volcanic banks peninsula, Canterbury, South Island, New Zealand 3 Birds Terrestrial 625 Natural 2010–2011 6 7 21 26 Biogeographic origin|Foraging method|Body mass|Adult diet|Mobility Plot location|Plot elevation|Patch area size|Forest percentage|Grassland precentage number of individuals Barbaro, L., Brockerhoff, E. G., Giffard, B., & van Halder, I. (2012). Edge and area effects on avian assemblages and insectivory in fragmented native forests. Landscape Ecology, 27(10), 1451–1463. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9800-x
Barbaro2017 Vineyards, Aquitaine, France 4 Birds Terrestrial 750 Agricultural 2013 6 8 56 20 Diet in a breeding season|Foraging guild|Clutch size|Body mass|Nesting site Grass cover|SNH in 100 meters buffer|SNH in 250 meters buffer|SNH in 500 meters buffer|SNH in 750 meters buffer number of individuals Barbaro, L., Rusch, A., Muiruri, E. W., Gravellier, B., Thiery, D., & Castagneyrol, B. (2017). Avian pest control in vineyards is driven by interactions between bird functional diversity and landscape heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2), 500–508. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12740
Bartonova2016 National Nature Reserves and National Natural Monuments, Czech Republic 5 Butterflies Terrestrial 78866 Natural 2004–2006 11 13 128 122 body size|mobility|density|voltinism|flight period lenght Relative Perimeter (Perimeter/Area)|Average altitude [m a.s.l.]|range of altitudes [m]|prevailing biotope type|Reserve area [m2] abundance class Bartonova, A., Benes, J., Fric, Z. F., Chobot, K., & Konvicka, M. (2016). How universal are reserve design rules? A test using butterflies and their life history traits. Ecography, 39(5), 456–464. doi:10.1111/ecog.01642
Bonada2007S Mediterranean rivers, Catalonia, Spain 6 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 96.3 Natural summer 1996 16 63 70 17 Maximal size|Life cycle duration|Potential number of reproduction cycles per year|Aquatic stages|Reproduction Discharge (l/s)|Temperature (ºC)|Conductivity (microS/cm)|pH|Oxygen (mg/l) average number of individuals Bonada, N., Rieradevall, M., & Prat, N. (2007). Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia, 589(1), 91–106. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-0723-5
Bonada2007W Mediterranean rivers, Catalonia, Spain 6 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 96.3 Natural winter 1996 14 63 44 22 Maximal size|Life cycle duration|Potential number of reproduction cycles per year|Aquatic stages|Reproduction Discharge (l/s)|Temperature (ºC)|Conductivity (microS/cm)|pH|Oxygen (mg/l) average number of individuals Bonada, N., Rieradevall, M., & Prat, N. (2007). Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia, 589(1), 91–106. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-0723-5
BrindAmour2011a Drouin lake, Laurentian Shield Lakes, Quebec, Canada 7 Fishes Freshwater 0.31 Semi-natural 2001 19 24 7 90 Type of diet|Feeding strata|Body morphology|Migration|Mouth position Mean littoral slope|Riparian slope|Mean depth|Substrate: Sand|Substrate: Rock abundance class Brind’Amour, A., Boisclair, D., Dray, S., & Legendre, P. (2011). Relationships between species feeding traits and environmental conditions in fish communities: a three-matrix approach. Ecological Applications, 21(2), 363–377. doi:10.1890/09-2178.1
BrindAmour2011b Pare lake, Laurentian Shield Lakes, Quebec, Canada 7 Fishes Freshwater 0.23 Semi-natural 2001 17 24 6 60 Type of diet|Feeding strata|Body morphology|Migration|Mouth position Mean littoral slope|Riparian slope|Mean depth|Substrate: Sand|Substrate: Rock abundance class Brind’Amour, A., Boisclair, D., Dray, S., & Legendre, P. (2011). Relationships between species feeding traits and environmental conditions in fish communities: a three-matrix approach. Ecological Applications, 21(2), 363–377. doi:10.1890/09-2178.1
Campos2018 Tropical floodplain lakes, Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil 8 Ostracods Freshwater 700 Mixed 2011 7 2 37 27 Swimming behavior|Body size Water temperature|Acidity|Electrical condutivity|Dissolved oxygen|Lake perimeter density Campos, R. de, Lansac-Tôha, F. M., Conceição, E. de O. da, Martens, K., & Higuti, J. (2018). Factors affecting the metacommunity structure of periphytic ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda): a deconstruction approach based on biological traits. Aquatic Sciences, 80(2), 16. doi:10.1007/s00027-018-0567-2
Carvalho2015 Tocantins-Araguaia river basin, Amazonia, Brazil 9 Stream fishes Freshwater 180000 Mixed 2008 8 26 65 27 BodyMass_grams|Trophic Guild|Parental Care|Water Column Position|Foragin Method Altitude (m)|Channel_Depth (m)|Channel_Width (m)|Turbidity (NTU)|Dissolved Oxygen presence/absence Carvalho, R. A., & Tejerina-Garro, F. L. (2015). The influence of environmental variables on the functional structure of headwater stream fish assemblages: a study of two tropical basins in Central Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology, 13(2), 349–360. doi:10.1590/1982-0224-20130148
Castro2010 Southern Portugal 10 Plants Terrestrial 1.9844 Agricultural NA 8 6 28 9 Surface leaf area|Leaf dry matter content|Leaf nitrogen content|Leaf carbon content|Leaf phosphorus content Soil nitrogen contect|Soil carbon content|Soil phosphorous contect|Organic matter in soil|Soil Carbon percentage cover Castro, H., Lehsten, V., Lavorel, S., & Freitas, H. (2010). Functional response traits in relation to land use change in the Montado. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 137(1–2), 183–191. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.02.002
Charbonnier2016a Forests, Europe 11 Bats Terrestrial 4400000 Forestry 2012–2013 5 9 27 175 Foraging behaviours|Diet type|Nest or roost site location|Migration status|Breeding date Plot altitude|Forest compositoin|Mean temperature|Mean precipitation|Deciduous cover number of individuals Charbonnier, Y. M., Barbaro, L., Barnagaud, J.-Y., Ampoorter, E., Nezan, J., Verheyen, K., & Jactel, H. (2016). Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests. Oecologia, 182(2), 529–537. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3671-9
Charbonnier2016b Forests, Europe 11 Birds Terrestrial 4400000 Forestry 2012–2013 5 10 73 208 Foraging behaviours|Diet type|Nest or roost site location|Migration status|Breeding date Plot altitude|Forest compositoin|Mean temperature|Mean precipitation|Deciduous cover number of individuals Charbonnier, Y. M., Barbaro, L., Barnagaud, J.-Y., Ampoorter, E., Nezan, J., Verheyen, K., & Jactel, H. (2016). Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests. Oecologia, 182(2), 529–537. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3671-9
Chmura2016 Karkonosze Mts, Sudeten Mts, Poland 12 Plants Terrestrial 135.05 Natural NA 10 17 46 364 Species Leaf Area (mean value)|Plant height (mean value)|Seed mass|Seed dispersal type|Rosette (leaf arrangement) Bryophytes cover|Decomposition stage|Length of a log |Area of a log surface|Moisture of a lo number of individuals Chmura, D., Żarnowiec, J., & Staniaszek-Kik, M. (2016). Interactions between plant traits and environmental factors within and among montane forest belts: A study of vascular species colonising decaying logs. Forest Ecology and Management, 379, 216–225. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.024
Choler2005 Southwestern Alps, Aravo, Grand Galibier, France 55 Plants Terrestrial 0.02 Semi-natural 2001 7 8 82 75 vegetative height|lateral spread|leaf elevation angle|Specific leaf area|leaf nitrogen relative south aspects|slope|microtopographic landform index|physical disturbance|zoogenic disturbance classes of percentage cover Choler, P. (2005). Consistent Shifts in Alpine Plant Traits along a Mesotopographical Gradient. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 37(4), 444–453. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4095863
ChongSeng2012a Seychelles archipelago 13 Coral reef fishes Marine 3600 Semi-natural 2010 17 2 147 79 Fish functional group|Fishing pressure Acropora coral|Crustose coralline algae|Leathery macroalgae|Non biological particles|Other benthic organisms number of individuals Chong-Seng, K. M., Mannering, T. D., Pratchett, M. S., Bellwood, D. R., & Graham, N. A. J. (2012). The Influence of Coral Reef Benthic Condition on Associated Fish Assemblages. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e42167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042167
ChongSeng2012b Seychelles archipelago 13 Coral reef fishes Marine 3600 Semi-natural 2012 12 2 155 78 Fish functional group|Fishing pressure Acropora coral|Crustose coralline algae|Leathery macroalgae|Non biological particles|Other benthic organisms number of individuals Chong-Seng, K. M., Mannering, T. D., Pratchett, M. S., Bellwood, D. R., & Graham, N. A. J. (2012). The Influence of Coral Reef Benthic Condition on Associated Fish Assemblages. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e42167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042167
Cleary2007a Mentaya river, Central Kalimantan province, Borneo, Indonesia 14 Birds Terrestrial 196 Mixed 1997–1998 36 4 145 37 Feeding Guild|Global distribution|Size|Conservation status Logging|Slope position|Elevation|Short saplings|Tall saplings log transformed number of individuals Cleary, Daniel F. R., Boyle, T. J. B., Setyawati, T., Anggraeni, C. D., Loon, E. E. V., & Menken, S. B. J. (2007). Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. Ecological Applications, 17(4), 1184–1197. doi:10.1890/05-0878
Cleary2007b Coral reefs, Spermonde Archipelago, Makassar, southwest Sulawesi, Indonesia 15 Foraminifera Marine 2418 Mixed 1997 10 3 24 31 Species form|Symbiont-bearing foraminifera|Skeletal structure Maximal sea depth|Maximal distance|Exposure to oceanic currents|Sedimentation|Coral formation number of individuals Cleary, Daniel F. R., & Renema, W. (2007). Relating species traits of foraminifera to environmental variables in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 334, 73–82. doi:10.3354/meps334073
Cleary2016 Coral reefs, Jakarta, Indonesia 16 Fishes Marine 1764 Fishing 2005 21 15 162 27 Trophic level?|Life expectancy?|Age maturity? Water transparency|Temperature|Acidity|Dissolved oxygen|Macroalgae number of individuals Cleary, D. F. R., Polónia, A. R. M., Renema, W., Hoeksema, B. W., Rachello-Dolmen, P. G., Moolenbeek, R. G., … de Voogd, N. J. (2016). Variation in the composition of corals, fishes, sponges, echinoderms, ascidians, molluscs, foraminifera and macroalgae across a pronounced in-to-offshore environmental gradient in the Jakarta Bay–Thousand Islands coral reef complex. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 110(2), 701–717. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.042
Cornwell2009 Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve, Coastal, California, USA 17 Woody plants Terrestrial 4.81 Semi-natural 2002–2003 3 3 42 34 geometric mean of specific leaf area measurements|arithmetic mean of specific leaf area measurments|number of samples in the species meanpotential diurnal insolation elevation above sea level|soil water content percentage cover Cornwell, W. K., & Ackerly, D. D. (2009). Community Assembly and Shifts in Plant Trait Distributions across an Environmental Gradient in Coastal California. Ecological Monographs, 79(1), 109–126. doi: 10.1890/07-1134.1
Diaz2008 Segura River basin,SE Spain 18 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 6300 Mixed 1999–2001 39 62 208 104 Maximal size|Life cycle duration|Potential No. reproductive cycles per year|Aquatic stages|Reproduction sampling date (month year)|total suspended solids|Ammonium|Nitrite|Nitrate number of individuals Mellado-Diaz, A., Luisa Suarez Alonso, M., & Rosario Vidal-Abarca Gutierrez, M. (2008). Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrates from a semi-arid catchment: patterns along complex environmental gradients. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 53(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01854.x
Doledec1996 Urban-rural gradient, Lyon, France 19 Birds Terrestrial 96 Mixed 1981 11 4 40 51 Feeding habit|Feeding stratum|Breeding stratum|Migratory strategy Presence of farms or villages|Presence of small buildings|Presence of high buildings|Presence of industry|Presence of fields abundance class Dolédec, S., Chessel, D., Braak, C. J. F. ter, & Champely, S. (1996). Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 3(2), 143–166. doi:10.1007/BF02427859
Drew2017 Archipelagos, Melanesia 20 Coral reef fishes Marine 15300000 Mixed NA 1 3 188 7 Schooling behavior|Maximal body size|Larvae development duration Reef Area presence/absence Drew, J. A., & Amatangelo, K. L. (2017). Community assembly of coral reef fishes along the Melanesian biodiversity gradient. PLoS ONE, 12(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186123
Dziock2011 Dessau, Magdeburg, Elbe, Floodplain, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany 21 Grasshopers Terrestrial 224 Agricultural 2006 5 6 16 34 Dispersal ability|Passive dispersal ability|Ovarioles number|Body size|Oviposition in plant material Elevation|Distance to the river|Class of litter cover|Vegetation height|Land use and intensity abundance class Dziock, F., Gerisch, M., Siegert, M., Hering, I., Scholz, M., & Ernst, R. (2011). Reproducing or dispersing? Using trait based habitat templet models to analyse Orthoptera response to flooding and land use. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 145(1), 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.015 Klaiber, J., Altermatt, F., Birrer, S., Chittaro, Y., Dziock, F., Gonseth, Y., … Bergamini, A. (2017). Fauna Indicativa (Report). Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL, CH-Birmensdorf. Retrieved from http://orgprints.org/34497/
Eallonardo2013 Inland salt/marsh, New York State, USA, near Montezuma; Carncross, Howland Island and Fox Ridge 54 Plants Mixed 3.5 Natural 2007 14 14 41 76 Perennial life span|Rhizomatous growth|Gramonoid growth form|C4 photosynthetic pathway|Succulence Electrical conductivity|extractible cation concentration|pH|total nitrogen|flooding duration relative percentage cover Eallonardo, A. S., Leopold, D. J., Fridley, J. D., & Stella, J. C. (2013). Salinity tolerance and the decoupling of resource axis plant traits. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24(2), 365–374. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01470.x
Farneda2015 Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) located ca. 80 km north of Manaus, Central Amazon, Brazil 22 Bats Terrestrial 680 Natural 2011–2013 9 8 41 17 trophic_level|habitat_classification|body_mass|dietary_specialization|vertical_stratification Average number of trees|Average tree diameter|Average vertical stratification|Average number of lianas|Average number of potential roosts average number of individuals Farneda, F. Z., Rocha, R., López-Baucells, A., Groenenberg, M., Silva, I., Palmeirim, J. M., … Meyer, C. F. J. (2015). Trait-related responses to habitat fragmentation in Amazonian bats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(5), 1381–1391. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12490
Frenette2012a Arid steppes, Eastern Morocco 23 Plants Terrestrial 11765 Mixed 2009 5 18 32 50 Leaf Area|Specific Leaf Area|Leaf Dry Matter Content|Leaf Carbon 13 Isotope Content|Leaf Nitrogen 15 Isotope Content name of the regional site|Grazing|Aridity index |Duration of exclosures|Elevation number of individuals Frenette-Dussault, C., Shipley, B., Léger, J.-F., Meziane, D., & Hingrat, Y. (2012). Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23(2), 208–222. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01350.x
Frenette2012b Arid steppes, Eastern Morocco 23 Plants Terrestrial 11765 Mixed 2010 5 18 32 50 Leaf Area|Specific Leaf Area|Leaf Dry Matter Content|Leaf Carbon 13 Isotope Content|Leaf Nitrogen 15 Isotope Content name of the regional site|Grazing|Aridity index |Duration of exclosures|Elevation number of individuals Frenette-Dussault, C., Shipley, B., Léger, J.-F., Meziane, D., & Hingrat, Y. (2012). Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23(2), 208–222. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01350.x
Frenette2013 Arid steppes, Eastern Morocco 23 Ants Terrestrial 11765 Mixed 2010 5 6 22 22 Feeding|Period of activity|Recoded period of activity|Color|Functional group Site region|Grazing|Aridity index|Duration of exclosures|Elevation number of individuals Frenette-Dussault, C., Shipley, B., & Hingrat, Y. (2013). Linking plant and insect traits to understand multitrophic community structure in arid steppes. Functional Ecology, 27(3), 786–792. doi:10.1111/1365–2435.12075
Fried2012 Agriculture areas, France 24 Plants Terrestrial 386000 Agricultural 2003–2006 11 10 75 218 Plant life form|Mode of species dispersal|Plant class|Plant height|Seed weight Temperature|Preciptiation|Soil pH|Sowing date|Tillage depth abundance class Fried, G., Kazakou, E., & Gaba, S. (2012). Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species’ response to management practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 158, 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.005
Gallardo2009 Ebro river, Mediterranee, Spain 25 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 11 Agricultural 2006 30 87 35 76 Maximal size|Respiration|Life cycle duration|Potential number of reproduction cycles per year|Reproduction Type of wetland|position in the watershed|sampling season|emergent vegetation|submerged vegetation number of individuals Gallardo, B., Gascon, S., Garcia, M., & Comin, F. A. (2009). Testing the response of macroinvertebrate functional structure and biodiversity to flooding and confinement. Journal of Limnology, 68(2), 315–326. doi: 10.3274/JL09-68-2-14
Gibb2015 Themeda grasslands, south-east Australia 26 Spiders Terrestrial 37.64970119 Mixed 2009–2011 7 10 86 36 Sex|Body length|Abdomen length|Abdomen width|Cephalothorax widt Elevation (m)|Temperature (ºC)|Precipitation (mm)|Grass height|Disturbance number of individuals Gibb, H., Muscat, D., Binns, M. R., Silvey, C. J., Peters, R. A., Warton, D. I., & Andrew, N. R. (2015). Responses of foliage-living spider assemblage composition and traits to a climatic gradient in Themeda grasslands: Spider Traits and Climatic Gradients. Austral Ecology, 40(3), 225–237. doi:10.1111/aec.12195
Goncalves2010 Santa Lucia Biological Station (SLBS), Santa Teresa County, Espirito Santo State, southeast Brazil 27 Spiders Terrestrial 0.44 Natural 2006–2007 1 4 146 45 Prosoma height|Prosoma width|Prosoma length|Opistosoma length Habitat type number of individuals Gonçalves-Souza, T., Brescovit, A. D., de C. Rossa-Feres, D., & Romero, G. Q. (2010). Bromeliads as biodiversity amplifiers and habitat segregation of spider communities in a Neotropical rainforest. The Journal of Arachnology, 38(2), 270–279. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788618
Goncalves2014a Open restingas, Atlantic rainforest, Brazil 28 Spiders Terrestrial 220000 Natural 2009 10 22 105 309 Guild|Prosoma height|Prosoma width|Prosoma length|Opistosoma length Plant species|Crown height|Higher crown length|Lower crown length|Leaf length number of individuals Gonçalves-Souza, T., Brescovit, A. D., de C. Rossa-Feres, D., & Romero, G. Q. (2010). Bromeliads as biodiversity amplifiers and habitat segregation of spider communities in a Neotropical rainforest. The Journal of Arachnology, 38(2), 270–279. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788618
Goncalves2014b Open restingas, Atlantic rainforest, Brazil 28 Spiders Terrestrial 220000 Natural 2010 10 22 112 356 Guild|Prosoma height|Prosoma width|Prosoma length|Opistosoma length Plant species|Crown height|Higher crown length|Lower crown length|Leaf length number of individuals Gonçalves-Souza, T., Romero, G. Q., & Cottenie, K. (2014). Metacommunity versus Biogeography: A Case Study of Two Groups of Neotropical Vegetation-Dwelling Arthropods. PLOS ONE, 9(12), e115137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115137
Jamil2013 Terschelling island, dune meadow, Netherlands 29 Plants Terrestrial 84 Agricultural 1982 5 5 28 20 Specific Leaf Area|Canopy height of a shoot|Lead dry matter content|Seed mass|Life span A1 horizon thickness|Moisture|Grassland management type|Use|Manure abundance class Jamil, T., Ozinga, W. A., Kleyer, M., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2013). Selecting traits that explain species-environment relationships: a generalized linear mixed model approach. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24(6), 988–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.12036.x
Jeliazkov2013 Ponds, agricultural areas, Brie, Seine-et-Marne, France 30 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 430 Agricultural 2012 47 91 112 200 Body size class|Body size class|Body size class|Body size class|Body size class Pond habitat and context|Pond area|Agricultural gradient|Urban gradient|Fish or amphibian presence number of individuals Jeliazkov, A. (2013). Scale-effects in agriculture-environment-biodiversity relationships (Doctoral thesis). Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.sudoc.fr/180446460
Jeliazkov2014 Ponds, agricultural areas, Brie, Seine-et-Marne, France 30 Amphibians Freshwater 430 Agricultural 2011–2012 9 16 11 135 Vertical foraging stratum: fossorial|Vertical foraging stratum: terrestrial|Vertical foraging stratum: aquatic|Vertical foraging stratum: arboreal|Diet: Arthropods Fish presence|Water Quality Index|Pond habitat and context|Proportion of wooded habitat|Pond density number of individuals Jeliazkov, A., Chiron, F., Garnier, J., Besnard, A., Silvestre, M., & Jiguet, F. (2014). Level-dependence of the relationships between amphibian biodiversity and environment in pond systems within an intensive agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia, 723(1), 7–23. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1503-z
Krasnov2015 Palearctic area; Slovakia 31 Flea Terrestrial 33000000 Mixed 1958, 2008 17 13 177 45 Abundance|Host number|Number of host exploted across region|Number of host exploted across continent|Host number correlaiton Size of the area|Mean altitude|Minimal altitude|Maximal altitude|NDVI for autumn presence/absence Krasnov, B. R., Shenbrot, G. I., Khokhlova, I. S., Stanko, M., Morand, S., & Mouillot, D. (2015). Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography, 38(2), 184–197. doi:10.1111/ecog.00915
Lowe2018a Urban gradient, Sydney, Australia 32 Spiders Terrestrial 1000 Mixed 2013 33 7 135 115 Guild|Hunting style|Capture lines|Body Size|Period of activity Land use type|Microhabitat (0–50 cm)|Microhabitat (50–100 cm)|Microhabitat (100–200 cm)|Leaf litter in microhabitat number of individuals Lowe, E. C., Threlfall, C. G., Wilder, S. M., & Hochuli, D. F. (2018). Environmental drivers of spider community composition at multiple scales along an urban gradient. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(4), 829–852. doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1466-x
Lowe2018b Urban gradient, focus on gardens, Sydney, Australia 32 Spiders Terrestrial 1000 Mixed 2013 20 7 95 65 Guild|Hunting style|Capture lines|Body Size|Period of activity Site region|Stoires number|Adjoining backyards|Distance between the bushes|Distance between fragments number of individuals Lowe, E. C., Threlfall, C. G., Wilder, S. M., & Hochuli, D. F. (2018). Environmental drivers of spider community composition at multiple scales along an urban gradient. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(4), 829–852. doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1466-x
Marteinsdottir2014 Grazed ex-arable fields and semi-natural grasslands, southeast Sweden 33 Plants Terrestrial 12 Mixed 2007–2008 7 3 39 14 Specific leaf area|Leaf drymatter content|Seed mass pH|Ammonium|Phosphorus|Moisture|Potassium average percentage cover Marteinsdóttir, B., & Eriksson, O. (2014). Plant community assembly in semi-natural grasslands and ex-arable fields: a trait-based approach. Journal of Vegetation Science, 25(1), 77–87. doi:10.1111/jvs.12058
Meffert2013 Urban wasteland, Berlin, Germany 34 Birds Terrestrial 892 Urban 2007 4 5 30 54 Food type|Foraging technique|Adult survival|Innovation rate|Migration strategy Population within 50 m|Population within 200 m|Sealing within 50 m|Sealing within 2000 m density Meffert, P. J., & Dziock, F. (2013). The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landscape Ecology, 28(5), 943–957. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9867-z
Ossola2015 Urban habitat, south-eastern Melbourne, Australia 35 Ants Terrestrial 100 Urban 2013–2014 20 5 60 29 Head width|Head lendth|Femur length|Pronotum width|Body size index Habitat type |Understory volume total|Soil cover|Litter cover|Litter mass number of individuals Ossola, A., Nash, M. A., Christie, F. J., Hahs, A. K., & Livesley, S. J. (2015). Urban habitat complexity affects species richness but not environmental filtering of morphologically-diverse ants. PeerJ, 3, e1356. doi:10.7717/peerj.1356
Pakeman2011 Drumbuie, Scotland 36 Plants Terrestrial 35 Agricultural 2007 33 28 148 30 Flowering start, month|Flowering end, month|log(seed mass)|variance in seed dimensions|leafing period, summer green SoilN|SoilC|Soil_C:N|MoistureLoss|LossOnIgnition relative abundances Pakeman, R. J. (2011). Multivariate identification of plant functional response and effect traits in an agricultural landscape. Ecology, 92(6), 1353–1365. doi:10.1890/10-1728.1
Pavoine2011 Coastal marsh plain Mekhada in the east of Annaba, La Mafragh, Algeria 37 Plants Terrestrial 100 Agricultural 1979 8 14 56 97 Anemogamous|Autogamous|Entomogamous|Annual|Biennial Clay|Silt|Sand|K2O|Mg2+ number of individuals Pavoine, S., Vela, E., Gachet, S., de Bélair, G., & Bonsall, M. B. (2011). Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space: a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly: Multiple data in community organization. Journal of Ecology, 99(1), 165–175. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01743.x
Pekin2011 Walpole and Albany, SW Australia 38 Plants Terrestrial 1073 Semi-natural 2007 17 4 183 16 Life cycle|Regeneration strategy|Root structure|N-fixing ability Soil type|Fire interval sequence|Fire frequency|Mean annual precip.|Potential evapotrans. number of individuals Pekin, B. K., Wittkuhn, R. S., Boer, M. M., Macfarlane, C., & Grierson, P. F. (2011). Plant functional traits along environmental gradients in seasonally dry and fire-prone ecosystem. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22(6), 1009–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01323.x
Pomati2013 peri-alpine mesotrophic Lake Zürich, Switzerland 39 Phytoplankton Freshwater 88.66 Mixed 2009 8 15 20 15 Phytoplankton morphology|Phytoplankton fluorescence|Length by SWS|Total fluorescence, yellow|Total fluorescence, orange Water depth|Water temperature|Water conductivity|Oxygen level|Dissolved organic carbon concentration Pomati, F., Kraft, N. J. B., Posch, T., Eugster, B., Jokela, J., & Ibelings, B. W. (2013). Individual Cell Based Traits Obtained by Scanning Flow-Cytometry Show Selection by Biotic and Abiotic Environmental Factors during a Phytoplankton Spring Bloom. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71677. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071677
Purschke2012a Semi-natural grasslands, Jordtorp area, Öland Baltic Island, Sweden 40 Plants Terrestrial 20.25 Semi-natural 2007 12 2 164 113 Adult plant longevity|epizoochorous dispersal potential percentage of grassland habitat in 1994|percentage of grassland habitat in 1938|percentage of grassland habitat in 1835|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1994|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1938 presence/absence Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P., & Prentice, H. C. (2012). Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia, 168(3), 773–783. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6
Purschke2012b Semi-natural grasslands, Jordtorp area, Öland Baltic Island, Sweden 40 Plants Terrestrial 20.25 Semi-natural 2007 12 1 53 113 Endozoochorous dispersal potential percentage of grassland habitat in 1994|percentage of grassland habitat in 1938|percentage of grassland habitat in 1835|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1994|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1938 presence/absence Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P., & Prentice, H. C. (2012). Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia, 168(3), 773–783. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6
Purschke2012c Semi-natural grasslands, Jordtorp area, Öland Baltic Island, Sweden 40 Plants Terrestrial 20.25 Semi-natural 2007 12 1 145 113 Wind dispersal potential percentage of grassland habitat in 1994|percentage of grassland habitat in 1938|percentage of grassland habitat in 1835|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1994|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1938 presence/absence Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P., & Prentice, H. C. (2012). Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia, 168(3), 773–783. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6
Purschke2012d Semi-natural grasslands, Jordtorp area, Öland Baltic Island, Sweden 40 Plants Terrestrial 20.25 Semi-natural 2007 12 1 117 113 Seed longevity index percentage of grassland habitat in 1994|percentage of grassland habitat in 1938|percentage of grassland habitat in 1835|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1994|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1938 presence/absence Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P., & Prentice, H. C. (2012). Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia, 168(3), 773–783. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6
Purschke2012e Semi-natural grasslands, Jordtorp area, Öland Baltic Island, Sweden 40 Plants Terrestrial 20.25 Semi-natural 2007 12 1 137 113 number of seeds per ramet percentage of grassland habitat in 1994|percentage of grassland habitat in 1938|percentage of grassland habitat in 1835|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1994|diversity of the landscape matrix in 1938 presence/absence Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P., & Prentice, H. C. (2012). Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia, 168(3), 773–783. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6
Rachello2007 Coral reefs, Jakarta, Indonesia 41 Corals Marine 2242 Mixed 1995 47 5 93 27 Shape category|Shape category b|Corallites-calice-valleys categoreis|Corallite size|Colony form Distance to Jakarta|Distance to mainland|Algal assemblage cover|Coraline algae cover|Turf algae cover number of colonies Rachello-Dolmen, P. G., & Cleary, D. F. R. (2007). Relating coral species traits to environmental conditions in the Jakarta Bay/Pulau Seribu reef system, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 73(3), 816–826. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.017
Raevel2012 Montpellier district, Mediterranean vertical outcrops 42 Plants Terrestrial 1886 Semi-natural 2008–2009 3 7 97 52 vegetative height|specific leaf area|seed mass|start of flowering|seed dispersal mode AgeClass|Height|Slope number of individuals Raevel, V., Violle, C., & Munoz, F. (2012). Mechanisms of ecological succession: insights from plant functional strategies. Oikos, 121(11), 1761–1770. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20261.x
Ribera2001 Scotland 43 Beetles Terrestrial 78772 Mixed 1995–1997 19 20 68 87 diameter of the eye|length of the antenna|maximum width of the pronotum|maximum depth of the pronotum|maximum width of the elytra Land use type|Texture|organic content|soil pH|available P number of individuals Ribera, I., Dolédec, S., Downie, I. S., & Foster, G. N. (2001). Effect of Land Disturbance and Stress on Species Traits of Ground Beetle Assemblages. Ecology, 82(4), 1112–1129. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1112:EOLDAS]2.0.CO;2
Robinson2014 Various habitats, protected reserves, Prague region, Czech Republic 44 Butterflies Terrestrial 260 Semi-natural 2003–2004 7 6 71 20 Average wing length|Eggs per batch|Voltinism|Diapause strategy|Diet breadth|Fligth period Habitat area|Shape complexity|Edge permeability|Area of open habitat|Proportion of open habitat number of individuals Robinson, N., Kadlec, T., Bowers, M. D., & Guralnick, R. P. (2014). Integrating species traits and habitat characteristics into models of butterfly diversity in a fragmented ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 281, 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.022 Kadlec, T., Benes, J., Jarosik, V., & Konvicka, M. (2008). Revisiting urban refuges: Changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.007 Konvicka, M., & Kadlec, T. (2011). How to increase the value of urban areas for butterfly conservation? A lesson from Prague nature reserves and parks. European Journal of Entomology, 108(2), 219–229. doi:10.14411/eje.2011.030
Robroek2017a Peat bogs, Western Europe 45 Vascular plants Terrestrial 3800000 Natural 2010–2011 9 5 15 56 SLA|Canopy_height|LDMC|Seed_mass|Seed_number Altitude|Bioclimatic|Mean annual temperature|Seasonality in temperature|Mean annual precipitation number of individuals Robroek, B. J. M., Jassey, V. E. J., Payne, R. J., Martí, M., Bragazza, L., Bleeker, A., … Verhoeven, J. T. A. (2017). Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nature Communications, 8(1161). doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01350-5
Robroek2017b Peat bogs, Western Europe 45 Bryophytes Terrestrial 3800000 Natural 2010–2011 9 12 10 56 SLA|Canopy_height|LDMC|Seed_mass|Seed_number Altitude|Bioclimatic|Mean annual temperature|Seasonality in temperature|Mean annual precipitation number of individuals Robroek, B. J. M., Jassey, V. E. J., Payne, R. J., Martí, M., Bragazza, L., Bleeker, A., … Verhoeven, J. T. A. (2017). Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nature Communications, 8(1161). doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01350-5
Shieh2012 Wu Stream, central Taiwan 46 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 696 Mixed 2005–2006 11 38 30 48 Collector-gatherer|Shredder|maximum body size|body flexibility|Temporary attachment Water temperature|Conductivity|Alkalinity|Sulfate|Elevation number of individuals Shieh, S.-H., Wang, L.-K., & Hsiao, W.-F. (2012). Shifts in functional traits of aquatic insects along a subtropical stream in Taiwan. Zoological Studies, 51(7), 1051–1065.
Spake2016 Coniferous plantations, UK 47 Beetles Terrestrial 95000 Forestry 1995–1997 9 6 51 44 Body length|Adult feeding guild|Hind-wing morphology|Activity pattern|Adult habitat affinity Chronosequence stage|Crop type|Bioclimatic zone|Percentage cover of open semi-natural area|Field, 10 cm – 1.9 m high number of individuals Spake, R., Barsoum, N., Newton, A. C., & Doncaster, C. P. (2016). Drivers of the composition and diversity of carabid functional traits in UK coniferous plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 359, 300–308. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.008
Stanko2014 Slovakia 48 Flea Terrestrial 12000 Agricultural 1986, 1990 16 6 27 13 Abundance|Host number|Continental phylogenetic distinctness|Regional phylogenetic distinctness|Place of living Mean altitude|Minimal altitude|Maximal altitude|NDVI for autumn|NDVI for spring number of individuals Krasnov, B. R., Shenbrot, G. I., Khokhlova, I. S., Stanko, M., Morand, S., & Mouillot, D. (2015). Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography, 38(2), 184–197. doi:10.1111/ecog.00915
Urban2004a Ponds, 200-ha section of the Yale-Myers Research Station in Union, Connecticut, USA 49 Macroinvertebrates Freshwater 2 Mixed 1999–2000 6 14 71 14 dispersal mode|trophic category Pond permanence|Loge Area|Max. Depth|Percent Vegetation structure|Percent canopy cover presence/absence Urban, M. C. (2004). Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology, 85(11), 2971–2978. Retrieved from http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/03-0631
Urban2004b Ponds, 200-ha section of the Yale-Myers Research Station in Union, Connecticut, USA 49 Amphibians Freshwater 2 Mixed 1999–2000 6 2 7 11 dispersal mode|trophic category Pond permanence|Loge Area|Max. Depth|Percent Vegetation structure|Percent canopy cover presence/absence Urban, M. C. (2004). Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology, 85(11), 2971–2978. Retrieved from http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/03-0631
vanKlink2017 Low intensity hay meadows, Swiss Plateau, Switzerland 50 Plants Terrestrial 12154 Agricultural 2014–2015 11 5 129 35 Canopy mean size|Canopy maximal size|Flowering start|Flowering end|Flowering mean Landscape unit|Treatment|Total annual precipitation|Elevation|Forest percentage cover van Klink, R., Boch, S., Buri, P., Rieder, N. S., Humbert, J.-Y., & Arlettaz, R. (2017). No detrimental effects of delayed mowing or uncut grass refuges on plant and bryophyte community structure and phytomass production in low-intensity hay meadows. Basic and Applied Ecology, 20, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2017.02.003
vanKlink2018a Low intensity hay meadows, Swiss Plateau, Switzerland 50 Bees Terrestrial 12154 Agricultural 2014–2015 11 7 46 35 Nesting guild|Larval substrate Landscape unit|Treatment|Total annual precipitation|Elevation|Forest Number of individuals van Klink, R., Menz, M. H. M., Baur, H., Dosch, O., Kühne, I., Lischer, L., … Humbert, J.-Y. (2019). Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applications.
vanKlink2018b Low intensity hay meadows, Swiss Plateau, Switzerland 50 Moths Terrestrial 12154 Agricultural 2014–2015 11 7 87 35 Family|Minimal winspan|Maximal wingspan|Larval substrate Landscape unit|Treatment|Total annual precipitation|Elevation|Forest Number of individuals van Klink, R., Menz, M. H. M., Baur, H., Dosch, O., Kühne, I., Lischer, L., … Humbert, J.-Y. (2019). Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applications.
vanKlink2018c Low intensity hay meadows, Swiss Plateau, Switzerland 50 Ground beetles Terrestrial 12154 Agricultural 2014–2015 11 7 60 33 Minimal size|Maximal size|Hind wing development|Trophic level|Hibernation Landscape unit|Treatment|Total annual precipitation|Elevation|Forest Number of individuals van Klink, R., Menz, M. H. M., Baur, H., Dosch, O., Kühne, I., Lischer, L., … Humbert, J.-Y. (2019). Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applications.
vanKlink2018d Low intensity hay meadows, Swiss Plateau, Switzerland 50 Rove beetles Terrestrial 12154 Agricultural 2014–2015 11 4 82 32 Minimal body length|Maximal body length|Humidity preference Landscape unit|Treatment|Total annual precipitation|Elevation|Forest Number of individuals van Klink, R., Menz, M. H. M., Baur, H., Dosch, O., Kühne, I., Lischer, L., … Humbert, J.-Y. (2019). Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applications.
vanKlink2018e Low intensity hay meadows, Swiss Plateau, Switzerland 50 Hoverflies Terrestrial 12154 Agricultural 2014–2015 11 6 26 35 Minimum body size|Maximum body size|Start of adult activitiy|End of activity|Larval substrate Landscape unit|Treatment|Total annual precipitation|Elevation|Forest Number of individuals van Klink, R., Menz, M. H. M., Baur, H., Dosch, O., Kühne, I., Lischer, L., … Humbert, J.-Y. (2019). Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applications.
Villeger2012a Estuarine ecosystem,Terminos Lagoon, Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 51 Fish Marine 3360 Semi-natural May-03 4 16 45 35 Mass|Oral gape surface|Oral gape shape|Oral gape position|Gill raker length Depth|Transparency|Salinity|Dissolved oxygen biomass Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F., & Mouillot, D. (2012). Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE, 7(7), e40679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040679
Villeger2012b Estuarine ecosystem,Terminos Lagoon, Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 51 Fish Marine 3360 Semi-natural Jul-03 4 16 48 34 Mass|Oral gape surface|Oral gape shape|Oral gape position|Gill raker length Depth|Transparency|Salinity|Dissolved oxygen biomass Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F., & Mouillot, D. (2012). Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE, 7(7), e40679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040679
Villeger2012c Estuarine ecosystem,Terminos Lagoon, Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 51 Fish Marine 3360 Semi-natural Nov-03 4 16 47 34 Mass|Oral gape surface|Oral gape shape|Oral gape position|Gill raker length Depth|Transparency|Salinity|Dissolved oxygen biomass Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F., & Mouillot, D. (2012). Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE, 7(7), e40679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040679
Villeger2012d Estuarine ecosystem,Terminos Lagoon, Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 51 Fish Marine 3360 Semi-natural May-06 4 16 43 35 Mass|Oral gape surface|Oral gape shape|Oral gape position|Gill raker length Depth|Transparency|Salinity|Dissolved oxygen biomass Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F., & Mouillot, D. (2012). Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE, 7(7), e40679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040679
Villeger2012e Estuarine ecosystem,Terminos Lagoon, Gulf of Mexico, Mexico 51 Fish Marine 3360 Semi-natural Jul-06 4 16 46 35 Mass|Oral gape surface|Oral gape shape|Oral gape position|Gill raker length Depth|Transparency|Salinity|Dissolved oxygen biomass Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F., & Mouillot, D. (2012). Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE, 7(7), e40679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040679
Westgate2012 Eucalypt forest, Booderee National Park, Australia 52 Amphibians Terrestrial 98 Natural 2007–2008 6 2 12 43 Ability to climb|Ability to burrow Hydroperiod|Logarithm of pond width|Logarithm of forest percentage|Logarithm of number of trees|Mean interval of fire return presence/absence Westgate, M. J., Driscoll, D. A., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2012). Can the intermediate disturbance hypothesis and information on species traits predict anuran responses to fire? Oikos, 121(10), 1516–1524. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19863.x
Yates2014 Pasture vs remnant vegetation, North east of New South Wales, Australia 53 Ants Terrestrial 45500 Mixed 2007 9 11 123 18 Minimum inter-eye distance|eye width|head length|mandible length|top tooth length habitat type|soil carbon-nitrogen ratio|soil p |herb cover|leaf litter cover|bare ground cover|Average ambient daily temperaturelong|lat number of individuals Yates, M. L., Andrew, N. R., Binns, M., & Gibb, H. (2014). Morphological traits: predictable responses to macrohabitats across a 300 km scale. PeerJ, 2, e271. doi:10.7717/peerj.271

Metadata preparation

All the entries from the four data sheets - “comm”, “trait”, “envir” and “coord” - were listed and described in a “DataKey” sheet to describe the tables’ content (Fig. 4). This required a thorough examination of the original papers to extract the relevant information for every dataset. In several cases, we required additional exchanges with the data owners for clarifications. Any empty cell in the “DataKey” sheet reflects a lack of information. Importantly, this sheet should not substitute for reading of the original paper and we strongly recommend the users to thoroughly examine each paper before using the data (see Online-only Table 2).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

“DataKey” structure and example of metadata information in CESTES datasets. A description is given when the variable full name is not self-explanatory or when potentially relevant information was available. Possible empty cells are due to lack of information that could not be recovered from the original publication nor from the data owners.

Online-only Table 2.

Original dataset citations.

DatasetName Database References (original studies/original repository)
Bagaria2012 CESTES Bagaria, G., Pino, J., Rodà, F. & Guardiola, M. Species traits weakly involved in plant responses to landscape properties in Mediterranean grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science 23, 432–442 (2012).
Barbaro2009a CESTES Barbaro, L. & van Halder, I. Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life‐history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography 32, 321–333 (2009).
Barbaro2009b CESTES Barbaro, L. & van Halder, I. Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life‐history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography 32, 321–333 (2009).
Barbaro2012 CESTES Barbaro, L., Brockerhoff, E. G., Giffard, B. & van Halder, I. Edge and area effects on avian assemblages and insectivory in fragmented native forests. Landscape Ecology 27, 1451–1463 (2012).
Barbaro2017 CESTES Barbaro, L. et al. Avian pest control in vineyards is driven by interactions between bird functional diversity and landscape heterogeneity. J Appl Ecol 54, 500–508 (2017).
Bartonova2016 CESTES Bartonova, A., Benes, J., Fric, Z. F., Chobot, K. & Konvicka, M. How universal are reserve design rules? A test using butterflies and their life history traits. Ecography 39, 456–464 (2016).
Bonada2007S CESTES Bonada, N., Rieradevall, M. & Prat, N. Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia 589, 91–106 (2007).
Bonada2007W CESTES Bonada, N., Rieradevall, M. & Prat, N. Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia 589, 91–106 (2007).
BrindAmour2011a CESTES Brind’Amour, A., Boisclair, D., Dray, S. & Legendre, P. Relationships between species feeding traits and environmental conditions in fish communities: a three-matrix approach. Ecological Applications 21, 363–377 (2011).
BrindAmour2011b CESTES Brind’Amour, A., Boisclair, D., Dray, S. & Legendre, P. Relationships between species feeding traits and environmental conditions in fish communities: a three-matrix approach. Ecological Applications 21, 363–377 (2011).
Campos2018 CESTES Campos, R. de, Lansac-Tôha, F. M., Conceição, E. de O. da, Martens, K. & Higuti, J. Factors affecting the metacommunity structure of periphytic ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda): a deconstruction approach based on biological traits. Aquat Sci 80, 16 (2018).
Carvalho2015 CESTES Carvalho, R. A. & Tejerina-Garro, F. L. The influence of environmental variables on the functional structure of headwater stream fish assemblages: a study of two tropical basins in Central Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 13, 349–360 (2015).
Castro2010 CESTES Castro, H., Lehsten, V., Lavorel, S. & Freitas, H. Functional response traits in relation to land use change in the Montado. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 137, 183–191 (2010).
Charbonnier2016a CESTES Charbonnier, Y. M. et al. Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests. Oecologia 182, 529–537 (2016).
Charbonnier2016b CESTES Charbonnier, Y. M. et al. Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests. Oecologia 182, 529–537 (2016).
Chmura2016 CESTES Chmura, D., Żarnowiec, J. & Staniaszek-Kik, M. Interactions between plant traits and environmental factors within and among montane forest belts: A study of vascular species colonising decaying logs. Forest Ecology and Management 379, 216–225 (2016).
Choler2005 CESTES

Dray, S. & Dufour, A.-B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 1–20 (2007).

Choler, P. Consistent Shifts in Alpine Plant Traits along a Mesotopographical Gradient. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 37, 444–453 (2005).

ChongSeng2012a CESTES Chong-Seng, K. M., Mannering, T. D., Pratchett, M. S., Bellwood, D. R. & Graham, N. A. J. The Influence of Coral Reef Benthic Condition on Associated Fish Assemblages. PLOS ONE 7, e42167 (2012).
ChongSeng2012b CESTES Chong-Seng, K. M., Mannering, T. D., Pratchett, M. S., Bellwood, D. R. & Graham, N. A. J. The Influence of Coral Reef Benthic Condition on Associated Fish Assemblages. PLOS ONE 7, e42167 (2012).
Cleary2007a CESTES

Cleary, D. F. R. et al. Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3293726.v1 (2016)

Cleary, D. F. R. et al. Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. Ecological Applications 17, 1184–1197 (2007).

Cleary2007b CESTES Cleary, D. F. R. & Renema, W. Relating species traits of foraminifera to environmental variables in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 334, 73–82 (2007).
Cleary2016 CESTES Cleary, D. F. R. et al. Variation in the composition of corals, fishes, sponges, echinoderms, ascidians, molluscs, foraminifera and macroalgae across a pronounced in-to-offshore environmental gradient in the Jakarta Bay–Thousand Islands coral reef complex. Marine Pollution Bulletin 110, 701–717 (2016).
Cornwell2009 CESTES Cornwell, W. K. & Ackerly, D. D. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs 79, 109–126 (2009).
Diaz2008 CESTES Mellado-Diaz, A., Luisa Suarez Alonso, M. & Rosario Vidal-Abarca Gutierrez, M. Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrates from a semi-arid catchment: patterns along complex environmental gradients. Freshwater Biology 53, 1–21 (2008).
Doledec1996 CESTES

Dray, S. & Dufour, A.-B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 1–20 (2007).

Dolédec, S., Chessel, D., Braak, C. J. F. ter & Champely, S. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environ Ecol Stat 3, 143–166 (1996).

Drew2017 CESTES

Drew, J. A. & Amatangelo, K. L. Community assembly of coral reef fishes along the Melanesian biodiversity gradient. figshare 10.1371/journal.pone.0186123 (2017).

Drew, J. A. & Amatangelo, K. L. Community assembly of coral reef fishes along the Melanesian biodiversity gradient. PLOS ONE 12, (2017).

Dziock2011 CESTES

Dziock, F. et al. Reproducing or dispersing? Using trait based habitat templet models to analyse Orthoptera response to flooding and land use. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 145, 85–94 (2011).

Klaiber, J. et al. Fauna Indicativa. (Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL, CH-Birmensdorf, 2017).

Eallonardo2013 CESTES Eallonardo, A. S., Leopold, D. J., Fridley, J. D. & Stella, J. C. Salinity tolerance and the decoupling of resource axis plant traits. Journal of Vegetation Science 24, 365–374 (2013).
Farneda2015 CESTES Farneda, F. Z. et al. Trait-related responses to habitat fragmentation in Amazonian bats. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1381–1391 (2015).
Frenette2012a CESTES Frenette-Dussault, C., Shipley, B., Léger, J.-F., Meziane, D. & Hingrat, Y. Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. Journal of Vegetation Science 23, 208–222 (2012).
Frenette2012b CESTES Frenette-Dussault, C., Shipley, B., Léger, J.-F., Meziane, D. & Hingrat, Y. Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. Journal of Vegetation Science 23, 208–222 (2012).
Frenette2013 CESTES Frenette-Dussault, C., Shipley, B. & Hingrat, Y. Linking plant and insect traits to understand multitrophic community structure in arid steppes. Functional Ecology 27, 786–792 (2013).
Fried2012 CESTES Fried, G., Kazakou, E. & Gaba, S. Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species’ response to management practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 158, 147–155 (2012).
Gallardo2009 CESTES Gallardo, B., Gascon, S., Garcia, M. & Comin, F. A. Testing the response of macroinvertebrate functional structure and biodiversity to flooding and confinement. Journal of limnology 68, 315–326 (2009).
Gibb2015 CESTES Gibb, H. et al. Responses of foliage-living spider assemblage composition and traits to a climatic gradient in Themeda grasslands: Spider Traits and Climatic Gradients. Austral Ecology 40, 225–237 (2015).
Goncalves2010 CESTES Gonçalves-Souza, T., Brescovit, A. D., de C. Rossa-Feres, D. & Romero, G. Q. Bromeliads as biodiversity amplifiers and habitat segregation of spider communities in a Neotropical rainforest. The Journal of Arachnology 38, 270–279 (2010).
Goncalves2014a CESTES Gonçalves-Souza, T., Romero, G. Q. & Cottenie, K. Metacommunity versus Biogeography: A Case Study of Two Groups of Neotropical Vegetation-Dwelling Arthropods. PLOS ONE 9, e115137 (2014).
Goncalves2014b CESTES Gonçalves-Souza, T., Romero, G. Q. & Cottenie, K. Metacommunity versus Biogeography: A Case Study of Two Groups of Neotropical Vegetation-Dwelling Arthropods. PLOS ONE 9, e115137 (2014).
Jamil2013 CESTES Jamil, T., Ozinga, W. A., Kleyer, M. & ter Braak, C. J. F. Selecting traits that explain species-environment relationships: a generalized linear mixed model approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 24, 988–1000 (2013).
Jeliazkov2013 CESTES Jeliazkov, A. Scale-effects in agriculture-environment-biodiversity relationships. (Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 2013). Retrieved from http://www.sudoc.fr/180446460
Jeliazkov2014 CESTES Jeliazkov, A. et al. Level-dependence of the relationships between amphibian biodiversity and environment in pond systems within an intensive agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia 723, 7–23 (2014).
Krasnov2015 CESTES Krasnov, B. R. et al. Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography 38, 184–197 (2015).
Lowe2018a CESTES Lowe, E. C., Threlfall, C. G., Wilder, S. M. & Hochuli, D. F. Environmental drivers of spider community composition at multiple scales along an urban gradient. Biodivers Conserv 27, 829–852 (2018).
Lowe2018b CESTES Lowe, E. C., Threlfall, C. G., Wilder, S. M. & Hochuli, D. F. Environmental drivers of spider community composition at multiple scales along an urban gradient. Biodivers Conserv 27, 829–852 (2018).
Marteinsdottir2014 CESTES Marteinsdóttir, B. & Eriksson, O. Plant community assembly in semi-natural grasslands and ex-arable fields: a trait-based approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 25, 77–87 (2014).
Meffert2013 CESTES Meffert, P. J. & Dziock, F. The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landscape Ecology 28, 943–957 (2013).
Ossola2015 CESTES Ossola, A., Nash, M. A., Christie, F. J., Hahs, A. K. & Livesley, S. J. Urban habitat complexity affects species richness but not environmental filtering of morphologically-diverse ants. PeerJ 3, e1356 (2015).
Pakeman2011 CESTES Pakeman, R. J. Multivariate identification of plant functional response and effect traits in an agricultural landscape. Ecology 92, 1353–1365 (2011).
Pavoine2011 CESTES

Dray, S. Dufour, A.-B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 1–20 (2007).

de Bélair, Gérard and Bencheikh-Lehocine, Mahmoud (1987) Composition et déterminisme de la végétation d'une plaine côtière marécageuse: La Mafragh (Annaba, Algérie). Bulletin d'Ecologie, 18(4), 393–407.

Pavoine, S., Vela, E., Gachet, S., de Bélair, G. & Bonsall, M. B. Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space: a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly: Multiple data in community organization. Journal of Ecology 99, 165–175 (2011).

Pekin2011 CESTES Pekin, B. K., Wittkuhn, R. S., Boer, M. M., Macfarlane, C. & Grierson, P. F. Plant functional traits along environmental gradients in seasonally dry and fire-prone ecosystem. Journal of Vegetation Science 22, 1009–1020 (2011).
Pomati2013 CESTES Pomati, F. et al. Individual Cell Based Traits Obtained by Scanning Flow-Cytometry Show Selection by Biotic and Abiotic Environmental Factors during a Phytoplankton Spring Bloom. PLOS ONE 8, e71677 (2013).
Purschke2012a CESTES Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P. & Prentice, H. C. Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia 168, 773–783 (2012).
Purschke2012b CESTES Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P. & Prentice, H. C. Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia 168, 773–783 (2012).
Purschke2012c CESTES Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P. & Prentice, H. C. Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia 168, 773–783 (2012).
Purschke2012d CESTES Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P. & Prentice, H. C. Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia 168, 773–783 (2012).
Purschke2012e CESTES Purschke, O., Sykes, M. T., Reitalu, T., Poschlod, P. & Prentice, H. C. Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia 168, 773–783 (2012).
Rachello2007 CESTES Rachello-Dolmen, P. G. & Cleary, D. F. R. Relating coral species traits to environmental conditions in the Jakarta Bay/Pulau Seribu reef system, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 73, 816–826 (2007).
Raevel2012 CESTES Raevel, V., Violle, C. & Munoz, F. Mechanisms of ecological succession: insights from plant functional strategies. Oikos 121, 1761–1770 (2012).
Ribera2001 CESTES Ribera, I., Dolédec, S., Downie, I. S. & Foster, G. N. Effect of Land Disturbance and Stress on Species Traits of Ground Beetle Assemblages. Ecology 82, 1112–1129 (2001).
Robinson2014 CESTES

Robinson, N., Kadlec, T., Bowers, M. D. & Guralnick, R. P. Integrating species traits and habitat characteristics into models of butterfly diversity in a fragmented ecosystem. Ecological Modelling 281, 15–25 (2014).

Kadlec, T., Benes, J., Jarosik, V. & Konvicka, M. Revisiting urban refuges: Changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landscape and Urban Planning 85, 1–11 (2008).

Konvicka, M. & Kadlec, T. How to increase the value of urban areas for butterfly conservation? A lesson from Prague nature reserves and parks. European Journal of Entomology 108, 219–229 (2011).

Robroek2017a CESTES

Robroek, B. et al. Data from: Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Dryad Digitial Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.g1pk3 (2017)

Robroek, B. J. M. et al. Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nature Communications 8, (2017).

Robroek2017b CESTES

Robroek, B. et al. Data from: Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Dryad Digitial Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.g1pk3 (2017)

Robroek, B. J. M. et al. Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nature Communications 8, (2017).

Shieh2012 CESTES Shieh, S.-H., Wang, L.-K. & Hsiao, W.-F. Shifts in Functional Traits of Aquatic Insects along a Subtropical Stream in Taiwan. Zoological Studies 51, 1051–1065 (2012).
Spake2016 CESTES Spake, R., Barsoum, N., Newton, A. C. & Doncaster, C. P. Drivers of the composition and diversity of carabid functional traits in UK coniferous plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 359, 300–308 (2016).
Stanko2014 CESTES Krasnov, B. R. et al. Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography 38, 184–197 (2015).
Urban2004a CESTES Urban, M. C. Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology 85, 2971–2978 (2004).
Urban2004b CESTES Urban, M. C. Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology 85, 2971–2978 (2004).
vanKlink2017 CESTES van Klink, R. et al. No detrimental effects of delayed mowing or uncut grass refuges on plant and bryophyte community structure and phytomass production in low-intensity hay meadows. Basic and Applied Ecology 20, 1–9 (2017).
vanKlink2018a CESTES van Klink, R. et al. Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applicationse e01900 (2019).
vanKlink2018b CESTES van Klink, R. et al. Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applicationse e01900 (2019).
vanKlink2018c CESTES van Klink, R. et al. Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applicationse e01900 (2019).
vanKlink2018d CESTES van Klink, R. et al. Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applicationse e01900 (2019).
vanKlink2018e CESTES van Klink, R. et al. Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applicationse e01900 (2019).
Villeger2012a CESTES Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F. & Mouillot, D. Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE 7, e40679 (2012).
Villeger2012b CESTES Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F. & Mouillot, D. Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE 7, e40679 (2012).
Villeger2012c CESTES Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F. & Mouillot, D. Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE 7, e40679 (2012).
Villeger2012d CESTES Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F. & Mouillot, D. Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE 7, e40679 (2012).
Villeger2012e CESTES Villéger, S., Miranda, J. R., Hernandez, D. F. & Mouillot, D. Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. PLOS ONE 7, e40679 (2012).
Westgate2012 CESTES Westgate, M. J., Driscoll, D. A. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Can the intermediate disturbance hypothesis and information on species traits predict anuran responses to fire? Oikos 121, 1516–1524 (2012).
Yates2014 CESTES Yates, M. L., Andrew, N. R., Binns, M. & Gibb, H. Morphological traits: predictable responses to macrohabitats across a 300 km scale. PeerJ 2, e271 (2014).
Belskaya2017 ceste Belskaya, E. A. & Zolotarev, M. P. Changes in the size structure of carabid communities in forest ecosystems under technogenic transformation. Russian Journal of Ecology 48, 152–160 (2017).
Chambers201X ceste Unpublished
Cleary2007d ceste

Cleary, D. F. R. et al. Variation in the diversity and composition of benthic taxa as a function of distance offshore, depth and exposure in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65, 557–570 (2005).

de Voogd, N. J. & Cleary, D. F. R. Relating species traits to environmental variables in Indonesian coral reef sponge assemblages. Mar. Freshwater Res. 58, 240–249 (2007).

Cormont2011 ceste Cormont, A., Vos, C., van Turnhout, C., Foppen, R. & ter Braak, C. Using life-history traits to explain bird population responses to changing weather variability. Climate Research 49, 59–71 (2011).
Huebner2012 ceste Huebner, K., Lindo, Z. & Lechowicz, M. J. Post-fire succession of collembolan communities in a northern hardwood forest. European Journal of Soil Biology 48, 59–65 (2012).
Jamil2012a ceste Jamil, T., Opdekamp, W., van Diggelen, R. & ter Braak, C. J. F. Trait-Environment Relationships and Tiered Forward Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models. International Journal of Ecology 2012, 1–12 (2012).
Jamil2012b ceste Jamil, T., Opdekamp, W., van Diggelen, R. & ter Braak, C. J. F. Trait-Environment Relationships and Tiered Forward Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models. International Journal of Ecology 2012, 1–12 (2012).
Jamil2012c ceste Jamil, T., Opdekamp, W., van Diggelen, R. & ter Braak, C. J. F. Trait-Environment Relationships and Tiered Forward Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models. International Journal of Ecology 2012, 1–12 (2012).
Jamil2014 ceste Jamil, T., Kruk, C. & ter Braak, C. J. F. A unimodal species response model relating traits to environment with application to phytoplankton communities. PLOS ONE 9, e97583 (2014).
Palozzi2017 ceste Palozzi, J. E. & Lindo, Z. Boreal peat properties link to plant functional traits of ecosystem engineers. Plant Soil 418, 277–291 (2017).

Data Records

Storage and formats used

We stored the CESTES database via three different storage systems and two types of formats to provide the users with several alternatives in accessing and using the data.

Storage

  • Figshare repository: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4459637 28 -> the fixed version of the database, and R scripts (original version 1.0).

  • iDiv Biodiversity Portal: 10.25829/idiv.286-21-2695 29 under the Primary Data tab -> the upgraded versions of the database, and R scripts following the updates when new datasets are integrated.

Formats

A zipped folder called “CESTES.zip” includes two alternative formats for the CESTES database:

  • a “xCESTES” folder that includes 80 Excel files (one file per dataset), each named according to the following structure: “AuthorPublicationYear.xlsx”.

  • a “rCESTES” folder that includes the CESTES core processed database (comm, traits, envir, coord matrices) as an R list object “CESTES.RData” plus two R scripts, and two metadata tables for data processing and exploration (see Usage Notes section).

    The “CESTES.zip” folder also includes:

  • an extended metadata table, “CESTES_metadata.xlsx”, that provides the general metadata information of all the datasets (i.e., combining the information from the Online-only Tables 12 of this Data Descriptor)

  • a tutorial document, “HOW_TO_SHARE_MY_DATA_FOR_CESTES.pdf”, that explains how to share data for integrating future datasets in the database (see Supplementary File 1).

The original, unprocessed files as they were provided by the data owners (thus possibly in different formats, various structures, with possible mistakes, without metadata, etc.), are available by request to the corresponding author, AJ.

We would also encourage any potential data contributors to contact AJ with possible data (cestes@idiv.de). The specific guidelines on which types of data are eligible to integration in CESTES, and on how to structure the data, and metadata are provided in the Supplementary File 1, as well as at: https://icestes.github.io/sharedata. If the dataset fulfils CESTES’ requirements and is provided in the right format with the appropriate metadata information, it will be included in the database. Each time the database is updated through the iDiv Biodiversity portal (https://idata.idiv.de/), a new DOI will be generated for the whole updated database, ensuring the new contributors are acknowledged and become part of the ‘CESTES consortium’. This will allow storing the data on a permanent platform and prevent them from sinking into oblivion30.

Structure of the database and the datasets

The 80 files currently in CESTES are structured into at least 8 sheets, depending on the original information and specificities of each dataset (Fig. 1).

The first four sheets include the processed core-data themselves:

  1. comm”: matrix of species abundances (68) or presences/absences (12), with species in columns and sites in rows (species are sometimes OTUs in some groups such as phytoplankton, or genus in some groups such as macroinvertebrates, or morphospecies where relevant).

  2. traits”: matrix of species trait information, i.e. any trait, be it functional, biological, life-history traits, either quantitative or categorical, functional group, etc., with traits in columns and species in rows.

  3. envir”: matrix of environmental variables in the broad sense of environment, i.e. any type of biotic and abiotic conditions or habitat characteristics relevant to the community of interest according to the original publication, with variables in columns and sites in rows.

  4. coord”: matrix of spatial coordinates, with X, the longitude and Y, the latitude as columns (in the Geographical Coordinate System as used in the original study) and sites in rows.

In every dataset, a “DataKey” sheet provides a description of all the entries of the four matrices (Fig. 4). Specific comments and information about any alteration applied to the dataset can be found in the “Notes” sheet, e.g. the species, or variables that were removed due to missing information, how the trait values were averaged across species when several measurements were available, how the original dataset was split into several datasets when there were several sampling periods, etc. The contact person for each dataset is also specified at the top of the “Notes” sheet of the dataset.

When the cleaning procedure implied changing the original datasets (see Data processing section above), we kept the information of the unaltered tables within the Excel file in separate sheets: “commfull”, “traitsfull”, “coordfull”, and/or “envirfull”.

The “splist” sheet includes the full list of taxa and the “sitelist” sheet, the list of sites. Both can provide additional information about the species (e.g. taxonomic classification) and the sites (e.g. regional information) when specified by the authors. Note that the species (site) names might not appear in the “splist” (“sitelist”) of all the datasets; this is because some authors preferred to provide their data in a redacted form, for instance, by censoring the species or the site names. As this does not hamper most of the analyses in community ecology, these datasets were integrated in the database.

Finally, when trait information was semi-quantitative and already fuzzy coded, we added a sheet “blo” to specify the Blocks information that is needed for weighting procedures in some trait analyses31.

Description of the database

The CESTES database includes 80 datasets that cover different areas of the globe, ecosystem types, taxonomic groups, and spatial extents (Fig. 1). An overview of these datasets is presented in the Online-only Table 1.

ceste, the non-spatial ancillary to CESTES

We provide access to 10 additional datasets that were not completely suitable for the CESTES database, due to the absence of spatial information or insufficient metadata but that were potentially valuable for their three other data matrices (see Online-only Table 3 attached to this manuscript). They follow the same structure as CESTES, except that they do not present the “coord” sheet and sometimes include only partial metadata. Some of the ceste datasets are likely to be enhanced in the near future and upgraded to the CESTES database as soon as they are made complete. ceste is stored in a zipped folder named “ceste.zip” that includes a series of 11 Excel files (10 data files + 1 metadata file) and can be found at the following links:

  • Figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4459637

  • -iDiv Biodiversity Portal: 10.25829/idiv.286-21-2695 (under the Attachments tab).

Online-only Table 3.

Overview of ceste, the non-spatial ancillary to CESTES.

DatasetName Taxonomic group Ecosystem and location Ecosystem type Level of human disturbance Extent (km2) Sampling date(s)/period nbEnv nbTra nbSpe nbSit Example of traits Example of environmental variables References
Belskaya2017 Insects Spruce-fir forest, Middle Ural Copper Smelter, Revda, Sverdlovsk oblast, Russia Terrestrial Mixed 429 2009, 2013 1 1 54 3 or 10 Bodz size Pollution level Belskaya, E. A., & Zolotarev, M. P. (2017). Changes in the size structure of carabid communities in forest ecosystems under technogenic transformation. Russian Journal of Ecology, 48(2), 152–160. doi:10.1134/S1067413617010040
Chambers201X Plants Grassland restoration Terrestrial Agricultural NA NA 9 7 21 24 specific leaf area|height|Nfixer|entomophily|dispersal moisture|litter|pH|phosphorous|available nitrogen Unpublished
Cleary2007d Sponges Coral reefs, Spermonde Archipelago, Makassar, southwest Sulawesi, Indonesia Marine Mixed 2418 1989 16 3 150 30 bioactivity|reproductive mode|growth form turbidity|mean velocity|mean salinity|mean temperature|exposure to oceanic currents

Cleary, D. F. R., Becking, L. E., de Voogd, N. J., Renema, W., de Beer, M., van Soest, R. W. M., & Hoeksema, B. W. (2005). Variation in the diversity and composition of benthic taxa as a function of distance offshore, depth and exposure in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 65(3), 557–570. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.06.025

de Voogd, N. J., & Cleary, D. F. R. (2007). Relating species traits to environmental variables in Indonesian coral reef sponge assemblages. Marine and Freshwater Research, 58(3), 240–249. doi:10.1071/MF06125

Cormont2011 Birds Marshland, forests, Netherlands Terrestrial Natural 41000 1984–2004 20 13 43 21 nest location|mean diet type|development|migration strategy winter severity|mean temperature of the coldest month|precipitation over non-breeding season|precipitation over breeding season|number of heatwave days Cormont, A., Vos, C., van Turnhout, C., Foppen, R., & ter Braak, C. (2011). Using life-history traits to explain bird population responses to changing weather variability. Climate Research, 49(1), 59–71. doi:10.3354/cr01007
Huebner2012 Collembola Fire forest, Gault Nature Reserve Québec, Canada Terrestrial Natural NA 2009 11 35 17 40 shape of dentes|number of eyes|total body length|furcula|pigmentation ground fire intensity|moisture content Huebner, K., Lindo, Z., & Lechowicz, M. J. (2012). Post-fire succession of collembolan communities in a northern hardwood forest. European Journal of Soil Biology, 48, 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.10.004
Jamil2012a Plants Outdoor mesocosms, floodplain, whole Netherlands (?) Terrestrial Experimental NA 2006 3 45 28 80 seed weight|germination percentage|height of seedlings|mean leaf weight|mean leaf area treatment of canopy presence|treatment of waterlogging|treatment of mowing Jamil, T., Kruk, C., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2014). A unimodal species response model relating traits to environment with application to phytoplankton communities. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e97583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097583
Jamil2012b Plants Outdoor mesocosms, floodplain, whole Netherlands (?) Terrestrial Experimental NA 2007 3 45 28 80 seed weight|germination percentage|height of seedlings|mean leaf weight|mean leaf area treatment of canopy presence|treatment of waterlogging|treatment of mowing Jamil, T., Kruk, C., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2014). A unimodal species response model relating traits to environment with application to phytoplankton communities. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e97583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097583
Jamil2012c Plants Outdoor mesocosms, floodplain, whole Netherlands (?) Terrestrial Experimental NA 2008 3 45 28 80 seed weight|germination percentage|height of seedlings|mean leaf weight|mean leaf area treatment of canopy presence|treatment of waterlogging|treatment of mowing Jamil, T., Kruk, C., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2014). A unimodal species response model relating traits to environment with application to phytoplankton communities. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e97583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097583
Jamil2014 Phytoplankton Lakes, South America, Europe, and North America Freshwater Mixed 52000000 1999, 2005–2006 13 8 60 201 volume|surface area|maximum linear dimension|aerotopes|flagella temperature|inorganic suspended solids|water column mix depth|light attenuation coefficient|conductivity Jamil, T., Opdekamp, W., van Diggelen, R., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2012). Trait-Environment Relationships and Tiered Forward Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models. International Journal of Ecology, 2012, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2012/947103
Palozzi2017 Plants White River Experimental Watersheds, Boreal peatland complex, Ontario, Canada Terrestrial Experimental 4 2015 15 9 14 10 heigth|leaf area|dry leaf mass|specific leaf area|leaf mass per area water pH|electrical conductivity|moisture content|phosphate concentration|basal respiration Palozzi, J. E., & Lindo, Z. (2017). Boreal peat properties link to plant functional traits of ecosystem engineers. Plant and Soil, 418(1–2), 277–291. doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3291-0

CESTES, a live database

The current CESTES database is the starting point of a broader data-sharing project that aims to continue integrating new data as they become available, and as new contributors join the consortium by sharing their data.

In order to maintain the CESTES database in the future, we set up three measures to facilitate the data exchange and communication about the database:

  1. a project website that advertises the database project and fosters data sharing: https://icestes.github.io/,

  2. a tutorial to guide people on how to share their data (Supp. Mat. 1; https://icestes.github.io/sharedata),

  3. a designated email address where people can send their data and ask questions about the CESTES project (cestes@idiv.de).

The data will be checked, curated, and integrated in the database through the iDiv Biodiversity Portal. This will update the database and generate a new DOI for the whole updated database, ensuring the new contributors are acknowledged.

Citation of the individual datasets and of the database

Each CESTES and ceste dataset (CESTES10,15,3294 and ceste95102) is associated with reference(s) that should be cited in addition to the CESTES database only if a single or few specific datasets are used separately from the database. For instance, if one uses only Villéger’s datasets (Villeger2012a, b, c, d, and e), one would have to cite Villéger’s original study10 (to acknowledge the study antecedence), and the CESTES database28 (because it is through the CESTES database that the structured data and metadata were made available). The list of citations for each dataset is provided in Online-only Table 2. See also CESTES29 for updated versions of the live database and follow the last news about the database via https://icestes.github.io/posts/.

Technical Validation

The technical validity of the CESTES database relies on five qualities pertaining to the datasets, and the overall database: the datasets (1) have individually been subject to peer-review process, (2) have reliable sampling properties, (3) have been thoroughly checked and cleaned, are ready-to-use for analyses and accompanied with metadata information; and the database (4) has a wide taxonomic and geographical coverage, and (5) will keep on extending in the future.

Peer-reviewed data and TER relevance

All the datasets included in CESTES had already been the subject of publication(s) in peer reviewed scientific journals, or PhD theses (see Online-only Table 2). Therefore, each of the dataset has already received technical validation through both analysis and evaluation. In addition, since the focus of those studies was the species trait-environment relationships, the choice of the traits and environmental variables has already been the result of scientific reflection by the authors about the potential relevance of these variables with respect to the ecological context and the scale of study.

Reliable sample properties

The datasets include an average of 71 sites, 72 species, 12 environmental variables, and 14 traits (Fig. 5 & Online-only Table 1). In the particular context of fourth-corner analysis, Dray & Legendre23 showed that datasets with fewer than 30 species need to have substantially more than 30 sites in order for this multivariate method to perform well and detect existing TER. If we refer to the thresholds their simulation study found, we can say that 75% of the CESTES datasets can support multivariate analyses of a very good to good statistical power, i.e. have a Type II error risk of less than 10% (Fig. 6). The remaining 25% fall not far from the 30% limit, meaning that the risk of failing to detect significant TER although these exist is 30%. For these datasets, the users might need to be cautious if they intend to apply fourth-corner analysis and might need to consider other methods.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Data content of the CESTES database. Distribution of the number of environmental, site, species and trait variables across the datasets.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Power check of the CESTES datasets with respect to fourth-corner analysis’ requirements. After the Fig. 4a from Dray & Legendre23. Plot of the CESTES datasets (blue dots) according to their number of sites and number of species compared to three power thresholds observed in the fourth-corner simulation study from Dray & Legendre23. The dashed rectangle represents the range of values tested in the simulations of Dray & Legendre23. The curves represent their observed thresholds of Type II error rates - red = 30%, orange = 10%, yellow = 5%, grey = 0%. The datasets that fall below these thresholds are theoretically exposed to respectively 30%, 10%, 5% or 0% chance to fail to detect significant TERs with fourth-corner analysis although these exist. The figure shows that the majority of the CESTES datasets fall in a medium (70%) to very good (>95%) power zone (Power = 100% − Type II error).

Thorough data quality control and harmonized metadata information

Each dataset has been the subject of thorough manual checking for matching between site, species and traits number and identity across the four data matrices, the absence of empty sites, “ghost” species, NAs, and the consistency between the data received and the original publication. All dataset alterations that we applied are reported in the “Notes” sheet of the dataset file. Therefore, we offer a clean database while keeping full transparency on the steps taken to this end. A large effort was also invested in reporting precise and harmonized metadata information for every dataset (Fig. 4) so that CESTES users can easily have a full overview of the type of data.

Wide taxonomic and geographical coverage

The geographical coverage of the database is global (Fig. 1) although as with most global compilations, there are clearly some regions of the world that are underrepresented, including Africa, Asia, India, Russia, which is typical103. To evaluate whether we might have missed potential datasets e.g., in Russia, we ran an additional literature search across a set of international journals specialised in Russian ecology (namely, Russian Journal of Ecology, Russian Journal of Marine Biology and Russian Journal of Biological Invasions). We used as search terms the simple association of “traits” AND “environment”. We found very few trait-based studies, only five studies that were relevant to the CESTES database, and only one that had spatial coordinates and agreed to share their data. In addition, we found a dearth of studies from North America. One reason for this was that a related database project focussing on plants primarily in the Americas has recently emerged104. Authors of plant datasets from these regions were less likely to respond to data request (only 17 out of 35 responded). This might also explain why, although our criteria covered all realms and taxonomic groups, we have a relatively low representation of plant data (i.e., less than 30% of our database, Fig. 2b) despite their large representation in other databases.

Upgradeable and extendable database

Importantly, the CESTES database is upgradeable. Anyone interested to share data of this type and contribute is welcome to do so by contacting the corresponding author (AJ, cestes@idiv.de). We will maintain and add to the CESTES database in the future to enrich it with more taxa, ecosystem types, and locations in the world. On the longer term, three possible and very valuable extensions could include (1) individual-based traits measurements, since intraspecific variation in traits can be highly valuable to study environmental tracking7,105,106, (2) temporal measurements of both traits, environment, and species abundances in order to study the temporal variability of the TER107, (3) phylogenies corresponding to the recorded groups that would help draw inferences from community108 or macroecological patterns8. This would allow extending CESTES’ potential for synthesis work aiming to bridge metacommunity ecology, macroecology, and biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research.

Usage Notes

In complement to the Excel version of CESTES, the database has also been stored as an.RData object to facilitate its further use for analyses in R109. This object is a list of lists. Each element of the first order list refers to one dataset, which itself is a list of four matrices; $comm, $envir, $traits and $coord.

First, this allows additional data processing. We set up R code routines (“CESTES_DataPrep.R”) that perform a thorough checking of the matrices, especially the match between the matrices’ dimensions, and the absence of empty sites, “ghost” species, and NAs.

The trait, environment, species, and coordinates variables were of mixed types (binary, categorical, ordinal, quantitative). To make the datasets properly readable and analysable by R, we made sure the numerical variables were treated as such by the program. We also re-coded the binary variables into 0/1 (numeric), the character and nominal variables into factors (this option can be turned off in the function), and, when relevant (i.e. when made explicit in the original publication), the numeric integer variables into ordinal variables (ordered factors).

Our R code routines generate data reports and send them to the working directory in the form of .txt files. These give the user different information on the “comm”, “traits”, “envir” and “coord” components of each dataset: list of variables and their types (factor, numeric, etc.), number of sites, species and traits, minimum and maximum value of the community data (that allows checking e.g., whether data are abundances or presences/absences).

The R code also applies some data transformation (e.g. scaling, Hellinger transformation, variable orthonormalization), generates spatial predictors (e.g. Moran Eigenvector Maps) and calculates some usual trait diversity metrics (e.g. Community Weighted Means, functional dispersion).

For all these processing, transformation and calculations, we used several R packages, available on CRAN, mainly readxl, doBy, plyr, dplyr, and gdata for the data processing, vegan, ade4, stats for the data transformation, ape and adespatial for the spatial processing, and picante and FD for the calculation of functional indices109.

All the R functions coded and used for the data preparation are provided in an R script “CESTES_DataPrep.R”. A fully processed and “ready-to-use” version of the CESTES database is stored as an .RData object called “CESTES.RData”.

Finally, further data plotting and metadata exploration are made possible via the R script “CESTES_Plots.R”, and the two metadata .csv files (“ListDat.csv”, “Metadat.csv”).

All these files (namely the database, the two R scripts, and the two metadata files) are stored in a zipped folder called “rCESTES.zip” in the “CESTES” folder at the following links:

  • Figshare (fixed version): 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4459637

  • iDiv Biodiversity portal (evolutive version): 10.25829/idiv.286-21-2695 (under the Primary Data tab).

The flexibility of the iDiv Biodiversity Portal storage will allow us to keep updating, extending and sustaining the CESTES database and the R scripts in the future.

Supplementary information

Supplementary File 1 (470.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (funded by the German Research Foundation; DFG FZT 118). We thank Jitendra Gaikwad for his precious help with the technical aspects of the database storage and management through the iDiv Biodiversity Portal (https://idata.idiv.de/, 10.25829/idiv.286-21-2695) and the iDiv IT Support for their help in the CESTES website development (https://icestes.github.io/). The datasets provided by A. Jeliazkov were collected with financial support from the Fédération d’Ile-de-France pour la Recherche en Environnement (FIRE FR-3020). The dataset provided by R. Carvalho and F.L. Tejerina-Garro had financial support from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq No. 471283/2006-1) granted to FLTG. The datasets provided by R. van Klink, J.-Y. Humbert, R. Arlettaz and M.H.M. Menz were collected with financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 31003A_125398/2 and 31003A_149656) awarded to RA.

Online-only Tables

Author contributions

Jonathan Chase (J.C.) and Alienor Jeliazkov (A.J.) conceived the idea of the database, developed the project, and did the literature search. A.J. gathered, cleaned and harmonized the data. A.J. and Darko Mijatovic (D.M.) prepared the metadata. A.J. organised and compiled the database, coded all the R code routines and drafted the manuscript. A.J. and Stéphane Chantepie (S.C.) built the CESTES website. All authors contributed with data and revisions to the manuscript.

Code availability

In addition to the Excel storage of the datasets, the CESTES database has also been stored as an.RData object to facilitate its further use for analyses in R109. It comes with R code scripts that allow further checking, processing, transforming and exploring the database content (for more details, see the Usage Notes section). We provide all this information in a folder called “rCESTES.zip” within the “CESTES” folder at the following links:

Figshare repository (fixed version): 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4459637.

iDiv Biodiversity Portal (evolutive version): 10.25829/idiv.286-21-2695.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41597-019-0344-7.

References

  • 1.Vellend, M. The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57). (Princeton University Press, 2016).
  • 2.Leibold, M. A. & Chase, J. M. Metacommunity Ecology. (Princeton University Press, 2017).
  • 3.Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2011;48:1079–1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology. 2002;16:545–556. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2006;21:178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cadotte MW, Arnillas CA, Livingstone SW, Yasui S-LE. Predicting communities from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2015;30:510–511. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Funk JL, et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes. Biological Reviews. 2017;92:1156–1173. doi: 10.1111/brv.12275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Devictor V, et al. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecology Letters. 2010;13:1030–1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meynard CN, et al. Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France? Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2011;20:893–903. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00647.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Villéger S, Miranda JR, Hernandez DF, Mouillot D. Low Functional β-Diversity Despite High Taxonomic β-Diversity among Tropical Estuarine Fish Communities. Plos One. 2012;7:e40679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Flynn DFB, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, Palmer MI, Naeem S. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity—ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology. 2011;92:1573–1581. doi: 10.1890/10-1245.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mouillot D, Graham NAJ, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Bellwood DR. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2013;28:167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Violle C, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos. 2007;116:882–892. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Díaz S, et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature. 2016;529:167–171. doi: 10.1038/nature16489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dolédec S, Chessel D, ter Braak CJF, Champely S. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 1996;3:143–166. doi: 10.1007/BF02427859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Open Traits Network. Open Traits. Available at: opentraits.org (2018).
  • 17.Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & Hering, D. An online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecological Indicators53, 271–282, www.freshwaterecology.info (2015).
  • 18.Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London. The PREDICTS project. PREDICTS, https://www.predicts.org.uk/ (2012).
  • 19.Newbold T, et al. call for data: PREDICTS: Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity in Changing Terrestrial Systems. Frontiers of Biogeography. 2012;4:155–156. doi: 10.21425/F54415577. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kattge J, et al. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology. 2011;17:2905–2935. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.CESTES coll. CESTES - A global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space. CESTES, https://icestes.github.io/ (2019).
  • 22.Legendre P, Galzin R, Harmelin-Vivien ML. Relating Behavior to Habitat: Solutions to The fourth-Corner Problem. Ecology. 1997;78:547–562. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dray S, Legendre P. Testing the Species Traits–Environment Relationships: The Fourth-Corner Problem Revisited. Ecology. 2008;89:3400–3412. doi: 10.1890/08-0349.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kleyer M, et al. Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: which multivariate methods? Journal of Vegetation Science. 2012;23:805–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01402.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ovaskainen O, et al. How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software. Ecology Letters. 2017;20:561–576. doi: 10.1111/ele.12757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown AM, et al. The fourth-corner solution – using predictive models to understand how species traits interact with the environment. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2014;5:344–352. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Broman KW, Woo KH. Data Organization in Spreadsheets. The American Statistician. 2018;72:2–10. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1375989. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jeliazkov A, 2019. CESTES - A global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space. figshare. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Jeliazkov A, the CESTES consortium. 2019. A global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space - version 1.0 (CESTES v1.0) iDiv Biodiversity Portal. [DOI]
  • 30.Whitlock MC. Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2011;26:61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chevenet F, Dolédec S, Chessel D. A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long-term ecological data. Freshwater Biology. 1994;31:295–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01742.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bagaria G, Pino J, Rodà F, Guardiola M. Species traits weakly involved in plant responses to landscape properties in Mediterranean grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2012;23:432–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01363.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barbaro L, Brockerhoff EG, Giffard B, van Halder I. Edge and area effects on avian assemblages and insectivory in fragmented native forests. Landscape Ecology. 2012;27:1451–1463. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9800-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Barbaro L, et al. Avian pest control in vineyards is driven by interactions between bird functional diversity and landscape heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2017;54:500–508. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barbaro L, van Halder I. Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life‐history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography. 2009;32:321–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05546.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bartonova A, Benes J, Fric ZF, Chobot K, Konvicka M. How universal are reserve design rules? A test using butterflies and their life history traits. Ecography. 2016;39:456–464. doi: 10.1111/ecog.01642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bonada N, Rieradevall M, Prat N. Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia. 2007;589:91–106. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0723-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brind’Amour A, Boisclair D, Dray S, Legendre P. Relationships between species feeding traits and environmental conditions in fish communities: a three-matrix approach. Ecological Applications. 2011;21:363–377. doi: 10.1890/09-2178.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Campos R, et al. Factors affecting the metacommunity structure of periphytic ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda): a deconstruction approach based on biological traits. Aquatic Sciences. 2018;80:16. doi: 10.1007/s00027-018-0567-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carvalho RA, Tejerina-Garro FL. The influence of environmental variables on the functional structure of headwater stream fish assemblages: a study of two tropical basins in Central Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology. 2015;13:349–360. doi: 10.1590/1982-0224-20130148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Castro H, Lehsten V, Lavorel S, Freitas H. Functional response traits in relation to land use change in the Montado. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2010;137:183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Charbonnier YM, et al. Bat and bird diversity along independent gradients of latitude and tree composition in European forests. Oecologia. 2016;182:529–537. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3671-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chmura D, Żarnowiec J, Staniaszek-Kik M. Interactions between plant traits and environmental factors within and among montane forest belts: A study of vascular species colonising decaying logs. Forest Ecology and Management. 2016;379:216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Choler P. Consistent Shifts in Alpine Plant Traits along a Mesotopographical Gradient. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research. 2005;37:444–453. doi: 10.1657/1523-0430(2005)037[0444:CSIAPT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chong-Seng KM, Mannering TD, Pratchett MS, Bellwood DR, Graham NAJ. The Influence of Coral Reef Benthic Condition on Associated Fish Assemblages. Plos One. 2012;7:e42167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cleary DFR, et al. Variation in the composition of corals, fishes, sponges, echinoderms, ascidians, molluscs, foraminifera and macroalgae across a pronounced in-to-offshore environmental gradient in the Jakarta Bay–Thousand Islands coral reef complex. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016;110:701–717. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cleary DFR, et al. Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. Ecological Applications. 2007;17:1184–1197. doi: 10.1890/05-0878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cleary DFR, Renema W. Relating species traits of foraminifera to environmental variables in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;334:73–82. doi: 10.3354/meps334073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecological Monographs. 2009;79:109–126. doi: 10.1890/07-1134.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Drew, J. A. & Amatangelo, K. L. Community assembly of coral reef fishes along the Melanesian biodiversity gradient. Plos One12 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 51.Drew JA, Amatangelo KL. 2017. Community assembly of coral reef fishes along the Melanesian biodiversity gradient. figshare. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Dziock F, et al. Reproducing or dispersing? Using trait based habitat templet models to analyse Orthoptera response to flooding and land use. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2011;145:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Eallonardo AS, Leopold DJ, Fridley JD, Stella JC. Salinity tolerance and the decoupling of resource axis plant traits. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2013;24:365–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01470.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Farneda FZ, et al. Trait-related responses to habitat fragmentation in Amazonian bats. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2015;52:1381–1391. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Frenette-Dussault C, Shipley B, Hingrat Y. Linking plant and insect traits to understand multitrophic community structure in arid steppes. Functional Ecology. 2013;27:786–792. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Frenette-Dussault C, Shipley B, Léger J-F, Meziane D, Hingrat Y. Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2012;23:208–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01350.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fried G, Kazakou E, Gaba S. Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species’ response to management practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2012;158:147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gallardo B, Gascon S, Garcia M, Comin FA. Testing the response of macroinvertebrate functional structure and biodiversity to flooding and confinement. Journal of limnology. 2009;68:315–326. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2009.315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gibb H, et al. Responses of foliage-living spider assemblage composition and traits to a climatic gradient in Themeda grasslands: Spider Traits and Climatic Gradients. Austral Ecology. 2015;40:225–237. doi: 10.1111/aec.12195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gonçalves-Souza T, Brescovit AD, de C. Rossa-Feres D, Romero GQ. Bromeliads as biodiversity amplifiers and habitat segregation of spider communities in a Neotropical rainforest. The Journal of Arachnology. 2010;38:270–279. doi: 10.1636/P09-58.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gonçalves-Souza T, Romero GQ, Cottenie K. Metacommunity versus Biogeography: A Case Study of Two Groups of Neotropical Vegetation-Dwelling Arthropods. Plos One. 2014;9:e115137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jamil T, Ozinga WA, Kleyer M, ter Braak CJF. Selecting traits that explain species-environment relationships: a generalized linear mixed model approach. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2013;24:988–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.12036.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jeliazkov, A. Scale-effects in agriculture-environment-biodiversity relationships. (Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 2013).
  • 64.Jeliazkov A, et al. Level-dependence of the relationships between amphibian biodiversity and environment in pond systems within an intensive agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia. 2014;723:7–23. doi: 10.1007/s10750-013-1503-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kadlec T, Benes J, Jarosik V, Konvicka M. Revisiting urban refuges: Changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2008;85:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Klaiber, J. et al. Fauna Indicativa. (Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL, CH-Birmensdorf, 2017).
  • 67.Konvicka M, Kadlec T. How to increase the value of urban areas for butterfly conservation? A lesson from Prague nature reserves and parks. European Journal of Entomology. 2011;108:219–229. doi: 10.14411/eje.2011.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Krasnov BR, et al. Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography. 2015;38:184–197. doi: 10.1111/ecog.00915. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lowe EC, Threlfall CG, Wilder SM, Hochuli DF. Environmental drivers of spider community composition at multiple scales along an urban gradient. Biodiversity Conservation. 2018;27:829–852. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1466-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Marteinsdóttir B, Eriksson O. Plant community assembly in semi-natural grasslands and ex-arable fields: a trait-based approach. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2014;25:77–87. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Meffert PJ, Dziock F. The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landscape Ecology. 2013;28:943–957. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9867-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mellado-Diaz A, Luisa Suarez Alonso M, Rosario Vidal-Abarca Gutierrez M. Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrates from a semi-arid catchment: patterns along complex environmental gradients. Freshwater Biology. 2008;53:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ossola A, Nash MA, Christie FJ, Hahs AK, Livesley SJ. Urban habitat complexity affects species richness but not environmental filtering of morphologically-diverse ants. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1356. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pakeman RJ. Multivariate identification of plant functional response and effect traits in an agricultural landscape. Ecology. 2011;92:1353–1365. doi: 10.1890/10-1728.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pavoine S, Vela E, Gachet S, de Bélair G, Bonsall MB. Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space: a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly: Multiple data in community organization. Journal of Ecology. 2011;99:165–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01743.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pekin BK, Wittkuhn RS, Boer MM, Macfarlane C, Grierson PF. Plant functional traits along environmental gradients in seasonally dry and fire-prone ecosystem. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2011;22:1009–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01323.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pomati F, et al. Individual Cell Based Traits Obtained by Scanning Flow-Cytometry Show Selection by Biotic and Abiotic Environmental Factors during a Phytoplankton Spring Bloom. Plos One. 2013;8:e71677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Purschke O, Sykes MT, Reitalu T, Poschlod P, Prentice HC. Linking landscape history and dispersal traits in grassland plant communities. Oecologia. 2012;168:773–783. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2142-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rachello-Dolmen PG, Cleary DFR. Relating coral species traits to environmental conditions in the Jakarta Bay/Pulau Seribu reef system, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2007;73:816–826. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Raevel V, Violle C, Munoz F. Mechanisms of ecological succession: insights from plant functional strategies. Oikos. 2012;121:1761–1770. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20261.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ribera I, Dolédec S, Downie IS, Foster GN. Effect of Land Disturbance and Stress on Species Traits of Ground Beetle Assemblages. Ecology. 2001;82:1112–1129. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1112:EOLDAS]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Robinson N, Kadlec T, Bowers MD, Guralnick RP. Integrating species traits and habitat characteristics into models of butterfly diversity in a fragmented ecosystem. Ecological Modelling. 2014;281:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Robroek BJM, et al. Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1161. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01350-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Robroek B. 2017. Data from: Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Dryad Digitial Repository. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 85.Shieh S-H, Wang L-K, Hsiao W-F. Shifts in Functional Traits of Aquatic Insects along a Subtropical Stream in Taiwan. Zoological Studies. 2012;51:1051–1065. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Spake R, Barsoum N, Newton AC, Doncaster CP. Drivers of the composition and diversity of carabid functional traits in UK coniferous plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. 2016;359:300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Urban MC. Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology. 2004;85:2971–2978. doi: 10.1890/03-0631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.van Klink R, et al. No detrimental effects of delayed mowing or uncut grass refuges on plant and bryophyte community structure and phytomass production in low-intensity hay meadows. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2017;20:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.van Klink, R. et al. Larval and phenological traits predict invertebrate community response to mowing regime manipulations. Ecological Applications, e01900 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 90.Westgate MJ, Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB. Can the intermediate disturbance hypothesis and information on species traits predict anuran responses to fire? Oikos. 2012;121:1516–1524. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19863.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Yates ML, Andrew NR, Binns M, Gibb H. Morphological traits: predictable responses to macrohabitats across a 300 km scale. PeerJ. 2014;2:e271. doi: 10.7717/peerj.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.De Bélair G, Bencheikh-Lehocine M. Composition et déterminisme de la végétation d’une plaine côtière marécageuse: La Mafragh (Annaba, Algérie) Bulletin d’Ecologie. 1987;18:393–407. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dray, S. & Dufour, A.-B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 1–20 (2007).
  • 94.Cleary DFR. 2016. Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. figshare. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 95.Belskaya EA, Zolotarev MP. Changes in the size structure of carabid communities in forest ecosystems under technogenic transformation. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2017;48:152–160. doi: 10.1134/S1067413617010040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cleary DFR, et al. Variation in the diversity and composition of benthic taxa as a function of distance offshore, depth and exposure in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2005;65:557–570. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.06.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cormont A, Vos C, van Turnhout C, Foppen R, ter Braak C. Using life-history traits to explain bird population responses to changing weather variability. Climate Research. 2011;49:59–71. doi: 10.3354/cr01007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.de Voogd NJ, Cleary DFR. Relating species traits to environmental variables in Indonesian coral reef sponge assemblages. Marine and Freshwater Research. 2007;58:240–249. doi: 10.1071/MF06125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Huebner K, Lindo Z, Lechowicz MJ. Post-fire succession of collembolan communities in a northern hardwood forest. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2012;48:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Jamil T, Kruk C, ter Braak CJF. A unimodal species response model relating traits to environment with application to phytoplankton communities. Plos One. 2014;9:e97583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jamil T, Opdekamp W, van Diggelen R, ter Braak CJF. Trait-Environment Relationships and Tiered Forward Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models. International Journal of Ecology. 2012;2012:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2012/947103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Palozzi JE, Lindo Z. Boreal peat properties link to plant functional traits of ecosystem engineers. Plant Soil. 2017;418:277–291. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3291-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Meyer C, Weigelt P, Kreft H. Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information. Ecology Letters. 2016;19:992–1006. doi: 10.1111/ele.12624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Engemann K, et al. A plant growth form dataset for the New World. Ecology. 2016;97:3243–3243. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Messier J, McGill BJ, Lechowicz MJ. How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecology Letters. 2010;13:838–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Violle C, et al. The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2012;27:244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Rosbakh S, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Poschlod P. Elevation matters: contrasting effects of climate change on the vegetation development at different elevations in the Bavarian Alps. Alpine Botany. 2014;124:143–154. doi: 10.1007/s00035-014-0139-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gianuca AT, et al. Integrating trait and phylogenetic distances to assess scale-dependent community assembly processes. Ecography. 2017;40:742–752. doi: 10.1111/ecog.02263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Jeliazkov A, 2019. CESTES - A global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space. figshare. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Jeliazkov A, the CESTES consortium. 2019. A global database for metaCommunity Ecology: Species, Traits, Environment and Space - version 1.0 (CESTES v1.0) iDiv Biodiversity Portal. [DOI]
  3. Drew JA, Amatangelo KL. 2017. Community assembly of coral reef fishes along the Melanesian biodiversity gradient. figshare. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Robroek B. 2017. Data from: Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Dryad Digitial Repository. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Cleary DFR. 2016. Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. figshare. [DOI] [PubMed]

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1 (470.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

In addition to the Excel storage of the datasets, the CESTES database has also been stored as an.RData object to facilitate its further use for analyses in R109. It comes with R code scripts that allow further checking, processing, transforming and exploring the database content (for more details, see the Usage Notes section). We provide all this information in a folder called “rCESTES.zip” within the “CESTES” folder at the following links:

Figshare repository (fixed version): 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4459637.

iDiv Biodiversity Portal (evolutive version): 10.25829/idiv.286-21-2695.


Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES