Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2019 Sep 1;12(9):3390–3398.

Clinicopathological significances of Feline sarcoma-related protein and β2-adrenoceptor expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

Xin Luo 1, Zhulin Yang 2, Xiao Liu 2, Ziru Liu 2, Xiongying Miao 2, Daiqiang Li 1, Qiong Zou 3, Yuan Yuan 3
PMCID: PMC6949805  PMID: 31934182

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant tumor with a high mortality, but biomarkers for its diagnosis, target therapy, and prognosis are not clinically available. Materials and methods: In the present study, Feline sarcoma-related protein (Fer) and ADRB2 protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. Results and discussion: Comparing with the peritumoral tissues, benign pancreatic tissues, and normal pancreatic tissues, Fer and ADRB2 protein was overexpressed in PDAC tumor tissues (P < 0.01). The percentage of patients with positive Fer and ADRB2 expression were significantly lower in PDAC without lymph node metastasis, without invasion to surrounding tissues and organs, and with low TNM stage (I/II stage) disease compared to PDAC patients with metastasis, invasion, and high TNM stage (III/IV) disease. PDAC patients with positive Fer or ADRB2 protein expression survived significantly shorter time than patients with negative Fer or ADRB2 protein expression (P = 0.000). Positive Fer and ADRB2 protein expression was an independent factor for poor prognosis of PDAC patients and ROC curve analysis showed that positive Fer and ADRB2 protein expression was sensitive and specific marker for the PDAC diagnosis. In conclusion, positive Fer and ADRB2 expression is associated with carcinogenesis of PDAC, disease progression, and poor prognosis of PDAC patients.

Keywords: ADRB2, Fer, immunohistochemistry, PDAC, pancreatic tissue

Introduction

It is widely known that pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant tumor originating from the pancreas [1]. Pancreatic cancers are reported the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA with the 5-year survival rate less than 5% [1-3]. The poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer is commonly thought to be associated with its high potential of metastasis and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [1]. It is estimated that about 90% of patients with pancreatic cancers dying from metastatic diseases [1,4]. Therefore, the seeking for biomarkers to improve the diagnosis and targeting therapy of PDAC remains to be continued.

Protein tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr) is a post-translational modification important for cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis, mobility, adhesion, etc [5]. Protein-tyrosine kinases are responsible for the protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Feline sarcoma (Fes) and Fes-related protein (Fer) are the members belonging to a distinct subgroup of the non-receptor protein tyrosine kinases [6]. Fer is ubiquitously expressed in a variety of tissues and revealed to regulate the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of various tumor cells [7-9]. The increased Fer expression has recently been demonstrated to be associated with the disease progression and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer [10], hepatocellular carcinoma [5], prostate cancer [7,8], colon cancer [11], NSCLC [12], and breast cancer [13]. However, the role of Fer expressions in PDAC has not been reported.

β-adrenoceptors (ADRBs) belong to a large group of the GPCRs superfamily that initiate multiple signaling cascades, including the adenylate cyclase (AC)/cAMP pathway [14]. Several lines of evidence indicate that catecholamines mediate tumor cell migration via ADRBs. This process was inhibited by the β-adrenergic receptor antagonists [15,16]. Recent studies have revealed that ADRB exerts an important regulatory role in the pathogenesis, progression, and malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma [16,17], NSCLC [18], breast cancer [19,20], prostate cancer [21], and oral squamous cell carcinoma [22]. Only a most recent study in small sample revealed an association of β-adrenoceptor overexpression with advanced disease and poor prognosis in PDAC patients [23].

In the present study, Fer and ADRB2 protein expressions were stained by immunohistochemistry in the tumor tissues of 106 PDAC patients, 35 peritumoral tissues, 55 benign pancreatic tissues, and 13 normal pancreatic tissues.

Materials and methods

Ethics

The use of tissues samples and medical records was pre-approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Brazil 2013).

Case selection

One hundred and six pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, thirteen normal pancreatic tissues, thirty-five peritumoral tissues, fifty-five precursor pancreatic tissues, and were collected at the Second and Third Xiangya Hospitals. Among the one hundred and six adenocarcinomas, sixty-one came from male patients (57.5%) and forty-five from female patients (42.5%) with an average age of 54.50 ± 11.53 years. Histopathologic subtypes of the one hundred and six adenocarcinomas included: thirty-eight well-differentiated adenocarcinomas (35.8%), thirty-five moderately-differentiated adenocarcinomas (33%), and thirty-three poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas (31.1%). Invasion and metastases were evaluated by following the published standard criteria [20]. Among the one hundred and six adenocarcinomas, eleven cases (10.4%) were T1, forty-one cases (39.6%) were T2, thirty-seven cases (34.9%) were T3, and sixteen cases (15.1%) were T4 stage tumors. Regional lymph node metastasis was found in twenty-nine of the one hundred and six adenocarcinomas (27.5%), and sixty-four cases (60.4%) had invasion to surrounding organs and tissues. The peritumoral tissues were collected over 2 cm from the tumors of the one hundred and six adenocarcinoma patients. Twelve of the thirty-five peritumoral tissues were normal, ten were PanINs (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms, PanINs) grade I, eight were PanINs grade II, and five were PanINs grade III. Survival information was obtained from all PDAC patients.

Fifty-five precursor pancreatic tissues were collected from twenty-nine (52.7%) males and twenty-six (47.3%) females. Of the fifty-five patients who supplied the precursor specimens, thirteen (23.6%) had an age ≤ 45 years and forty-two (76.4%) had an age > 45 years. The fifty-five precursor tissues included twenty chronic pancreatitis tissue (36.4%), twenty adenomas (36.4%), and fifteen PanINs (27.3%). Ten, six, and four of the twenty chronic pancreatitis tissues exhibited mild, moderate, and severe pancreatitis, respectively. Five and fifteen of the twenty adenomas exhibited mucinous adenomas and serous adenomas, respectively. Four, three, and two of the twenty adenomas exhibited mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia, respectively. Among the fifteen PanINs, six had grade I, five had grade II, and four had grade III PanINs. Thirteen normal pancreatic tissues were collected from twenty pancreatic adenomas during surgery. Tissues were rinsed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 to 48 hours followed by 10% formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at four μm-thick.

Immunohistochemistry

Fer and ADRB2 polyclonal antibodies (rabbit anti-human) and EnVisionTM Detection Kit were obtained from Dako Corporation (Carpentaria, CA, USA). Positive controls were provided with the kit. EnVision immunohistochemistry of Fer and ADRB2 was performed according to the manufacture manual. After deparaffinized, the sections were incubated with 3% H2O2 for 15 min in the dark. Antigen retrieval was conducted with 10 mM Sodium citrate with 0.05% Tween-20 (pH 6.0) for 30 minutes at 96°C. The sections were incubated with Fer and ADRB2 primary antibody (1:100 dilution) for 2 hrs followed by incubation with several drops of Solution A (ChemMateTM EnVision+/HRP) for 30 min, DAB staining, and hematoxylin counter-staining. After dehydrated, sections were soaked in xylene and mounted. Five hundred cells were examined per section by two observers, independently. An average of the percentages from these two observers was used for final evaluation. A cutoff of 25% positive cells was used as a standard. Patients with ≥ 25% cells being Fer and ADRB2 positive were considered positive.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with the statistical package for the Social Sciences (Version 17.0). The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the inter-relationship between Fer and ADRB2 protein expression and histological or clinical factors. Kaplan-Meier univariate survival analysis and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the overall survival of PDAC patients. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis and the calculation of 95% confidence interval. AUC for Fer and ADRB2 was performed with ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve). Statistical significance was designed at P < 0.05.

Results

Fer and ADRB2 protein expression in adenocarcinoma, peritumoral, precursor, and normal pancreatic tissues

Fer and ADRB2 protein expression was stained using immunohistochemistry. Positive Fer and ADRB2 expressions were mainly seen in the cytoplasm of cells (Figures 1, 2). However, Fer and ADRB2 were negatively stained in all thirteen normal tissues. In the one hundred and six adenocarcinomas, sixty-nine and sixty-five were Fer (65.1%) and ADRB2 (61.3%) positive, respectively. In the thirty-five peritumoral tissues, eleven and ten were Fer (31.4%) and ADRB2 (28.6%) positive, respectively. In fifty-five precursor pancreatic lesions, fifteen and twelve were Fer (27.8%) and ADRB2 (21.8%) positive, respectively. The percentage of positive Fer or ADRB2 was significantly higher in PDAC tumors than that in normal and precursor pancreatic tissues as well as peritumoral tissues (P < 0.01) (Table 1). Peritumoral and precursor tissues with positive Fer and/or ADRB2 expression exhibited moderate to severe dysplasia and grade II or III PanINs. Among the fifty-five precursor le-sions, the percentage of positive Fer and ADRB2 protein expression were 20.0% (4/20) and 15.0% (3/20), 30.0% (6/20) and 25.0% (5/20), 33.3% (5/15) and 26.7% (4/15) in chronic pancreatitis, adenomas, and PanINs, respectively. However, no significant differences in the percen-tage of positive Fer and ADRB2 protein expression were found between three types of precursor lesions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Immunohistological staining of Fer protein. A. Positive expression of Fer in poorly differentiated PDAC, ×200. B. Negative expression of Fer in poorly differentiated PDAC, ×200. C. Positive expression of Fer in chronic pancreatitis, ×200. D. Positive expression of Fer in adenoma, ×200.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immunohistological staining of ADRB2 protein. A. Positive expression of ADRB2 in moderately-differentiated PDAC, ×200. B. Negative expression of ADRB2 in poorly differentiated PDAC, ×200. C. Positive expression of ADRB2 in intraepithelial neoplasia II, ×200. D. Positive expression of ADRB2 in peritumori tissue, ×200.

Table 1.

Comparison of Fer and ADRB2 expression in normal, benign, and malignant pancreatic tissues

Tissue type Case No. Fer positive (%) ADRB2 positive (%)
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 106 69 (65.1) 65 (61.3)
Peritumoral tissues 35 11 (31.4)* 10 (28.6)*
Benign tissues 55 15 (27.8)* 12 (21.8)*
Normal pancreatic tissues 13 0 (0.0)* 0 (0.0)*

Compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma:

*

P < 0.01.

Fer and ADRB2 protein expressions were associated with clinicopathological characteristics of PDAC

The percentage of positive Fer and ADRB2 protein expression were significantly lower in patients without metastasis in lymph node, without invasion, and with low TNM stage (I/II) disease compared to patients with metastasis, invasion, and high TNM stage (III/IV) disease (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The percentage of positive Fer expression was significantly lower in PDAC patients with tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm than that in patients with tumor diameter > 3 cm (P < 0.05). The expressions of Fer and ADRB2 exhibited no significant association with tumor differentiation, sex, and age of patients. Among the sixty-nine cases with positive Fer expression, forty-nine cases had positive ADRB2 expression (Table 2). Among the thirty-seven cases with negative Fer expression, twenty-one cases had negative ADRB2 expression. The Fer protein expression positively correlated with ADRB2 protein expression in PDAC tissues (χ2 = 7.832, P = 0.005).

Table 2.

Correlations of Fer and ADRB2 protein expression with the clinicopathological characteristics of PDAC

CPC Case No. Fer ADRB2


Pos No. (%) x2 P value Pos No. (%) x2 P value
Age (year)
    ≤ 45 years 22 16 (72.7) 0.712 0.399 16 (72.7) 1.523 0.217
    > 45 years 84 53 (63.4) 49 (58.3)
Sex
    Male 61 37 (60.7) 1.246 0.264 37 (60.7) 0.027 0.870
    Female 45 32 (71.1) 28 (62.2)
Differentiation
    Well 38 25 (65.8) 0.716 0.699 19 (50.0) 4.979 0.083
    Moderately 35 21 (60.0) 21 (60.0)
    Poorly 33 23 (69.7) 25 (75.8)
Tumor size
    ≤ 3 cm 13 4 (30.8) 7.737 0.021 8 (61.5) 0.694 0.723
    3-5 cm 68 48 (70.6) 40 (58.8)
    > 5 cm 25 17 (68.0) 17 (68.0)
Lymph node metastasis
    No 77 44 (57.1) 7.832 0.005 41 (53.2) 7.736 0.005
    Yes 29 25 (86.2) 24 (82.8)
Invasion
    No 42 16 (38.1) 22.317 < 0.001 18 (42.9) 9.998 0.002
    Yes 64 53 (82.8) 47 (73.4)
TNM stage
    I 11 2 (18.2) 22.865 < 0.001 7 (63.6) 14.460 0.002
    II 42 22 (52.4) 17 (40.5)
    III 37 31 (83.8) 27 (73.0)
    IV 16 14 (87.5) 14 (87.5)

Fer and ADRB2 expression correlated with the overall survival in PDAC patients

Twenty-nine patients survived over one year, but seventy-seven patients died within one year. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis results were presented in Table 3. Tumor differentiation, size, invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage were significantly associated with the mean overall survival time in PDAC patients (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Mean overall survival time was significantly shorter in Fer and ADRB2 positive patients than that in Fer and ADRB2 negative patients (P < 0.001) (Figure 3A, 3B). Cox multivariate analysis results were presented in Table 4. Poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and high TNM stage (III/IV) negatively correlated with mean overall survival. Positive Fer and ADRB2 expression negatively correlated with overall survival and positively correlated with mortality. Both Fer and ADRB2 positive expressions were independent prognostic factors (Table 4). The AUC analysis showed that Fer (AUC = 0.689, 95% CI: 0.603-0.705) and ADRB2 (AUC = 0.670, 95% CI: 0.583-0.758) had high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of PDAC (Figure 3C, 3D).

Table 3.

Correlations of clinicopathological characteristics, Fer and ADRB2 expression with the mean survival in patients with PDAC

Group Case No. (n) Mean survival (month) Chi-square P value
Sex
    Male 61 9.98 (2-24) 1.656 0.198
    Female 45 8.61 (2-21)
Age (year)
    ≤ 45 22 8.18 (3-19) 2.144 0.143
    > 45 84 9.73 (2-24)
Differentiation
    Well 38 11.27 (3-24)
    Moderately 35 9.74 (3-21) 17.786 < 0.001
    Poorly 33 6.86 (2-14)
Tumor size
    < 3 cm 13 13.46 (5-21) 7.504 0.023
    3-5 cm 68 9.34 (2-22)
    > 5 cm 25 7.40 (3-24)
TNM stage
    I 11 16.46 (11-24)
    II 42 11.37 (3-22) 80.807 < 0.001
    III 37 7.14 (2-17)
    IV 16 4.56 (2-8)
Lymph node metastasis
    no 77 10.64 (2-24) 27.120 < 0.001
    yes 29 6.35 (2-12)
Invasion
    no 42 13.33 (5-24) 46.949 < 0.001
    yes 54 6.83 (2-17)
Fer
    - 37 12.84 (5-24) 25.725 < 0.001
    + 69 7.52 (2-19)
ADRB2
    - 41 11.91 (3-22) 12.357 < 0.001
    + 65 7.84 (2-24)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A. Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival in patients with PDAC and with positive and negative Fer expression. B. Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival in patients with PDAC and with positive and negative ADRB2 expression. C. ROC analysis of the diagnosis ability of Fer. D. ROC analysis of the diagnosis ability of ADRB2.

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of survival rate in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and Fer and ADRB2 expression

Groups Factors B SE wald P RR 95% CI

Lower Upper
Differentiated degree Well/moderately/poorly .314 .148 4.501 .034 1.369 1.024 1.830
Tumor size < 3 cm/3-5 cm/> 5 cm .116 .203 .327 .568 1.123 .754 1.672
Lymph node metastasis No/yes .601 .286 4.416 .036 1.824 1.041 3.195
Invasion No/yes .390 .355 1.207 .272 1.477 .737 2.962
TNM stage I/II/III/IV .639 .233 7.521 .006 1.895 1.200 2.991
Fer -/+ .597 .253 5.568 .018 1.817 1.106 2.983
ADRB2 -/+ .478 .226 4.473 .034 1.613 1.036 2.512

Discussion

This study compared Fer and ADRB2 protein expression in PDAC tumors with its expression in normal pancreatic tissues, benign pancreatic lesions, and peritumoral tissues using immunohistochemistry. Significantly high percentage of positive Fer and ADRB2 expression was observed in PDAC tumors compared to other tissues. Positive Fer and ADRB2 expression significantly correlated with the severe clinical symptoms and poor prognosis in PDAC patients.

Fer has been demonstrated to involve in the cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration [24-26]. Dysregulation of Fer expression has been proposed to involve in the carcinogenesis and cancer development [5,10-13] and associate with the clinicopathological features of several human tumors [5,10-13]. However, Fer expression in PDAC has not been reported. Our study first showed that positive Fer protein expression significantly correlated with tumor progression and survival in PDAC patients. In addition, Fer protein expression was revealed to be an independent prognostic biomarker in PDAC patients. Moreover, the percentage of positive Fer protein expression was significantly higher in PDAC tissues than that in benign pancreatic lesions, suggesting the involvement of Fer expression in the carcinogenesis. Thus, Fer may involve in the carcinogenesis of PDAC, and a biomarker for the poor prognosis in PDAC patients.

ADRB2 is important in the initiation and progression of cancer [27,28] through regulating inflammation, angiogenesis, epithelial mesenchymal transition, and apoptosis [27]. Beta-adrenergic receptors have also been demonstrated to involve in the cell migration [29] and proliferation of tumor cells [30,31]. ADRB2 has been revealed to regulate the stress-induced pancreatic tumor growth and angiogenesis [32], pancreatic cancer cell invasion [33], cell cycle, and apoptosis [34,35]. Only on study measured ADRB2 protein expression in a small sample of PDAC tissues with comparison with its expression in peritumoral tissues [23]. This study measured ADRB2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry in one hundred and six PDAC tumor tissues, thirty-five peritumoral tissues, fifty-five precursor, and thirteen normal pancreatic tissues. A significant correlation was found between positive ADRB2 protein expression, the clinical severity, and survival in PDAC patients. In addition, this study first suggested that ADRB2 is involved in the carcinogenesis of PDAC. Consistent with a previous study [23], positive ADRB2 expression is an independent prognostic biomarker in PDAC patients. Interestingly, this study demonstrated that Fer protein expression positively correlated with ADRB2 protein expression in PDAC tumors (P = 0.005), suggesting that these two molecules may play a collaborative effect in the development of PDAC may through regulating same signaling pathways.

In conclusion, Fer and ADRB2 may play a crucial role in the tumorigenesis and progression of PDAC. Positive Fer and ADRB2 protein expression could be a biomarker for the poor prognosis in PDAC patients.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Zhang K, Yao H, Yang Z, Li D, Yang L, Zou Q, Yuan Y, Miao X. Comparison of ILK and ERP29 expressions in benign and malignant pancreatic lesions and their clinicopathological significances in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18:352–9. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1331-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1605–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yachida S, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. The pathology and genetics of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:413–22. doi: 10.5858/133.3.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li H, Ren Z, Kang X, Zhang L, Li X, Wang Y, Xue T, Shen Y, Liu Y. Identification of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins associated with metastasis and functional analysis of FER in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:366. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Greer P. Closing in on the biological functions of FPS/FES and FER. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:278–89. doi: 10.1038/nrm783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pasder O, Shpungin S, Salem Y, Makovsky A, Vilchick S, Michaeli S, Malovani H, Nir U. Downregulation of Fer induces PP1 activation and cell-cycle arrest in malignant cells. Oncogene. 2006;25:4149–206. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zoubeidi A, Rocha J, Zouanat FZ, Hamel L, Scarlata E, Aprikian AG, Chevalier S. The Fer tyrosine kinase cooperates with interleuikin-6 to activate signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and pro-mote human prostate cancer cell growth. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:142–55. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu G, Craig AW, Greer P, Miller M, Anastasiadis PZ, Lilien J, Balsamo J. Continuous association of cadherin with b-catenin requires the non-receptor tyrosine-kinase Fer. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:3207–19. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu Z, Shao Y, Tan L, Shi H, Chen S, Guo J. Clinical significance of the low expression of FER1L4 in gastric cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:9613–7. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2259-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yue B, Sun B, Liu C, Zhao S, Zhang D, Yu F, Yan D. Long non-coding RNA Fer-1-like protein 4 suppresses oncogenesis and exhibits prognostic value by associating with miR-106a-5p in colon cancer. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:1323–32. doi: 10.1111/cas.12759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kawakami M, Morita S, Sunohara M, Amano Y, Ishikawa R, Watanabe K, Hamano E, Ohishi N, Nakajima J, Yatomi Y, Nagase T, Fukayama M, Takai D. FER overexpression is associated with poor postoperative prognosis and cancer-cell survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:598–612. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ivanova IA, Vermeulen JF, Ercan C, Houthuijzen JM, Saig FA, Vlug EJ, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ, Vooijs M, Derksen PW. FER kinase promotes breast cancer metastasis by regulating α6- and β1-integrin-dependent cell adhesion and anoikis resistance. Oncogene. 2013;32:5582–92. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kunos G, Ishac EJ, Gao G, Jiang L. Inverse regulation of hepatic alpha 1B- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors: cellular mechanisms and physiological implications. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1995;757:261–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb17483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Masur K, Niggermann B, Zanker KS, Entschladen F. Norepinephrine-induced migration of SW 480 colon carcinoma cells is inhibited by beta-blockers. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2866–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kassahun WT, Guen B, Ungemach FR, Jonas S, Abraham G. Expression and Functional Coupling of Liver β2 -Adrenoceptors in the Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Pharmacology. 2012;89:313–20. doi: 10.1159/000337381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen D, Xing W, Hong J, Wang M, Huang Y, Zhu C, Yuan Y, Zeng W. The beta2-adrenergic receptor is a potential prognostic biomarker for human hepatocellularcarcinoma after curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3556–65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2396-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schuller HM, Cekanova M. NNK-induced hamster lung adenocarcinomas over-express beta2-adrenergic and EGFR signaling pathways. Lung Cancer. 2005;49:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Du Y, Zhou L, Wang Y, Yan T, Jiang Y, Shao Z, Yin W, Lu J. Association of alpha2a and beta2 adrenocep-tor expression with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:1337–44. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gargiulo L, Copsel S, Rivero EM, Galés C, Sénard JM, Lüthy IA, Davio C, Bruzzone A. Differential β2-adrenergic receptor expression defines the phenotype of non-tumorigenic and malignant hu-man breast cell lines. Oncotarget. 2014;5:10058–69. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hennenberg M, Strittmatter F, Walther S, Hedlund P, Andersson KE, Stief CG, Schlenker B, Gratzke C. α1-adrenoceptor activation induces phosphorylation of β2-adrenoceptors in human prostate tissue. BJU Int. 2011;108:922–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shang ZJ, Liu K, Liang DF. Expression of beta2-adrenergic receptor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38:371–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wan C, Gong C, Zhang H, Hua L, Li X, Chen X, Chen Y, P value Ding X, He S, Cao W, Wang Y, Fan S, Xiao Y, Zhou G, Shen A. β2-adrenergic receptor signaling promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) pro-gression through facilitating PCBP2-dependent c-myc expression. Cancer Lett. 2016;373:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Greer P. Closing in on the biological functions of Fps/Fes and Fer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:278–289. doi: 10.1038/nrm783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Orlovsky K, Theodor L, Malovani H, Chowers Y, Nir U. Gamma interferon down-regulates Fer and induces its association with inactive Stat3 in colon carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:4997–5001. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Piedra J, Miravet S, Castaño J, Pálmer HG, Heisterkamp N, García de Herreros A, Duñach M. p120 Cate-nin-associated Fer and Fyn tyrosine kinases regulate beta-catenin Tyr-142 phosphorylation and be-ta-catenin-alpha-catenin Interaction. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:2287–97. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2287-2297.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kafetzopoulou LE, Boocock DJ, Dhondalay JK, Powe DG, Ball GR. Biomarker identification in breast cancer: beta-adrenergic receptor signaling and pathways to therapeutic response. Computat Struct Biotechnol J. 2013;6:e201303003. doi: 10.5936/csbj.201303003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shi M, Liu D, Duan H, Qian L, Wang L, Niu L, Zhang H, Yong Z, Gong Z, Song L, Yu M, Hu M, Xia Q, Shen B, Guo N. The β2-adrenergic receptor and Her2 comprise a positive feedback loop in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125:351–62. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0822-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Powe DG, Voss MJ, Zänker KS, Habashy HO, Green AR, Ellis IO, Entschladen F. Beta-blocker drug therapy reduces secondary cancer formation in breast cancer and improves cancer specific survival. Oncotarget. 2010;1:628–38. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu X, Wu WK, Yu L, Sung JJ, Srivastava G, Zhang ST, Cho CH. Epinephrine stimulates esophageal squam-ous-cell carcinoma cell proliferation via beta-adrenoceptor-dependent transactivation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/cyclooxygenase-2 pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105:53–60. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang D, Ma Q, Shen S, Hu H. Inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell proliferation by propranolol occurs through apoptosis induction: the study of beta-adrenoceptor antagonist’s anticancer effect inpancreatic cancer cell. Pancreas. 2009;38:94–100. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318184f50c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shan T, Ma J, Ma Q, Guo K, Guo J, Li X, Li W, Liu J, Huang C, Wang F, Wu E. β2-AR-HIF-1α: a novel regulatory axis for stress-induced pancreatic tumor growth and angiogenesis. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:1023–34. doi: 10.2174/15665240113139990055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang D, Ma QY, Hu HT, Zhang M. β2-adrenergic antagonists suppress pancreatic cancer cell invasion by inhibiting CREB, NFκB and AP-1. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:19–29. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.1.11944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang D, Ma Q, Wang Z, Zhang M, Guo K, Wang F, Wu E. β2-adrenoceptor blockage induces G1/S phase arrest and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells via Ras/Akt/NFκB pathway. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:146. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shan T, Ma Q, Zhang D, Guo K, Liu H, Wang F, Wu E. β2-adrenoceptor blocker synergizes with gemci-tabine to inhibit the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells via apoptosis induction. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;665:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.04.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES