Skip to main content
PMC home page
Viruses logoLink to Viruses
. 2019 Dec 16;11(12):1160. doi: 10.3390/v11121160

IFI16 Inhibits Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 Replication in a MAVS-Dependent Manner in MARC-145 Cells

Xiaobo Chang 1,2,†, Xibao Shi 2,3,†, Xiaozhuan Zhang 3, Li Wang 2, Xuewu Li 2, Aiping Wang 4, Ruiguang Deng 2, Enmin Zhou 1, Gaiping Zhang 1,2,5,6,*
PMCID: PMC6950192  PMID: 31888156

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus, and the current strategies for controlling PRRSV are limited. Interferon gamma-inducible protein 16 (IFI16) has been reported to have a broader role in the regulation of the type I interferons (IFNs) response to RNA and DNA viruses. However, the function of IFI16 in PRRSV infection is unclear. Here, we revealed that IFI16 acts as a novel antiviral protein against PRRSV-2. IFI16 could be induced by interferon-beta (IFN-β). Overexpression of IFI16 could significantly suppress PRRSV-2 replication, and silencing the expression of endogenous IFI16 by small interfering RNAs led to the promotion of PRRSV-2 replication in MARC-145 cells. Additionally, IFI16 could promote mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS)-mediated production of type I interferon and interact with MAVS. More importantly, IFI16 exerted anti-PRRSV effects in a MAVS-dependent manner. In conclusion, our data demonstrated that IFI16 has an inhibitory effect on PRRSV-2, and these findings contribute to understanding the role of cellular proteins in regulating PRRSV replication and may have implications for the future antiviral strategies.

Keywords: PRRSV, IFI16, antiviral protein, MAVS

1. Introduction

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), caused by PRRS virus (PRRSV), is an economically important viral disease all over the word [1,2]. PRRSV is a member of the Arteriviridae family in the order Nidovirales and consists of an enveloped 15 kb positive-strand RNA genome containing at least ten open reading frames (ORFs) [3,4,5,6]. PRRSV is divided into two genotypes: the European genotype (type 1) and the North American genotype (type 2). There is considerable sequence variability within both groups, and only about 50–60% nucleotide sequence identity between the two subtypes [7,8]. Recently, based on a new proposed classification scheme, type 1 and type 2 PRRSV have been classified into two species and renamed PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2, respectively [9,10]. PRRSV has genetic diversity and has evolved multiple mechanisms to evade the host immune response [11,12]. Currently, there are no effective control strategies against PRRS.

Type I interferons (IFN-α/β) play pivotal roles in the innate defense against viral infection. During virus infection, viral nucleic acids are the main pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) which can be detected by the cellular receptors such as retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs) and interferon gamma-inducible protein 16 (IFI16) (DNA sensor). Then, RIG-I recruits the mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS), while IFI16 activates the endoplasmic reticulum signaling adaptor STING, leading to TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1)-dependent phosphorylation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and transcription of type I interferons (IFNs) [13,14,15,16]. Then, type I interferons bind to IFN-α/β receptors and induce the production of a large number of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in response to virus [17].

Previous studies have demonstrated that IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-γ have an antiviral effect against PRRSV-2 [18,19,20,21,22]. In addition, interferon-stimulated genes (such as OAS1 and Mx2) have been confirmed to have antiviral effects against type 2 PRRSV strain S1 and PRRSV-WUH3 strain [23,24], which indicated that interferon-stimulated genes play important roles in inhibiting PRRSV replication. IFI16, a member of the PYHIN protein family that contains a pyrin domain and two DNA-binding HIN domains, displays multifaceted activity due to its ability to bind to various target proteins and, in turn, modulate various functions including direct actions in regulation of transcription, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, antiviral restriction, and inflammation [25,26,27,28]. Besides, IFI16 has been reported to have a broader role in the regulation of interferon-stimulated genes expression, leading to responses to not only DNA viruses, but also RNA viruses, such as Sendai virus [29,30]. However, the role of IFI16 in regulating PRRSV replication is unclear. So, this study aimed to explore whether IFI16 could inhibit PRRSV replication.

In this study, we have shown that IFI16 could suppress PRRSV-2 replication for the first time. Besides, IFI16 could positively regulate MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling pathway and interact with MAVS. Furthermore, MAVS was essential for IFI16 to inhibit PRRSV-2 replication, which suggested that IFI16 plays an important role in the antiviral response to PRRSV-2, and these findings may have implications for the future control of PRRS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells and Virus

HEK-293T (a human embryonic kidney cell line) and PRRSV permissive MARC-145 (an African green monkey kidney cell line) cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Gibco) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. PRRSV-2 strain BJ-4 (GenBank No. AF331831) was a kind gift from Prof. Hanchun Yang (China Agricultural University).

2.2. Antibodies and Reagents

Mouse anti-Flag M2 monoclonal antibody, mouse anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody, anti-Flag affinity gel beads, anti-c-Myc affinity gel beads, and mouse IgG agarose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PRRSV N protein antibody was purchased from GeneTex. Mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody was purchased from GenScript. Rabbit anti-MAVS monoclonal antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST). The secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP were purchased from Jackson Immuno Research. Polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (polyI:C) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Recombinant human IFN-β was purchased from PEPROTECH. Lipofectamine2000 transfection reagent and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.3. Plasmids

To generate IFI16-Myc, the cDNA of IFI16 from MARC-145 cells was amplified and cloned into pCMV-Myc vector (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The genes of RIG-I, MDA5, MAVS, TBK1, and IRF3 from MARC-145 cells were cloned into pCMV-Flag (Beyotime), creating RIG-I-Flag, MDA5-Flag, MAVS-Flag, TBK1-Flag, and IRF3-Flag respectively. The expression plasmids for 3×Flag-tagged MAVS and MAVS truncations were constructed by standard molecular cloning method from cDNA templates. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The IFN-β promoter reporter plasmid (p-284) has been constructed as previous described [31]. All primers used are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers used for expression plasmid construction.

Primers Sequences (5′ to 3′)
IFI16-F CGCGGATCCATGGAAAAAAAATACAAGAACATTG
IFI16-R CCGCTCGAGTTAGAAGAAAAAGCCTGGTGAAGTT
RIG-I-F TCCCCCCGGGCATGACTACGGAGCAGCGGCGCAGCCT
RIG-I-R ATCTGTCGACTCATTTGGCCATTTCTGCTGGAT
MDA5-F CGCGGATCCATGTCGAATGGGTATTCCACAGAC
MDA5-R CCGCTCGAGCTAATCCTCATCACTAAATAAACAGCA
MAVS-F CCCAAGCTTATGCCGTTTGCTGAAGACAAGACCT
MAVS-R CCGCTCGAGCTAGTGCAGGCGCCGCCGGTACATC
IRF3-F CCCAAGCTTATGGGAACCCCAAAGCCACGGAT
IRF3-R CCGCTCGAGTCAGGTCTCCCCAGGGCCCTGGAA
TBK1-F CGCGGATCCATGCAGAGCACTTCTAATCATCT
TBK1-R CCGCTCGAGCTAAAGACAGTCAACGTTGCGA
MAVS-1-F CCCAAGCTTATGCCGTTTGCTGAAGACAAGACCT
MAVS-1-R CGGGGTACCCTAGTGGCATGGCCCCTCCCTCT
MAVS-2-F CCCAAGCTTATGTACCAGCCTCGGACCTCGGAC
MAVS-2-R CGGGGTACCCTAGTGCAGGCGCCGCCGGTACATC
MAVS-3-F CCCAAGCTTATGTCCTCTGACCTGGCAGCCCTC
MAVS-3-R CGGGGTACCCTAGTGCAGGCGCCGCCGGTACATC
Open in a new tab

2.4. Gene Silencing with siRNA

The specific siRNAs targeting IFI16, MAVS, and the control siRNA (siNC) were synthesized by GenePharma. The siRNA sequences are as follows: siIFI16, 5′-CCAAGCAGCAGUUGCUUAATT-3′; siMAVS, 5′-GCAUCUCUUCAGUACCCUUTT-3′; the nontargeting control siRNA (siNC), 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′. MARC-145 cells were transfected with 50 nM siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). At 24 h post-transfection (hpt), the transfected cells were infected with PRRSV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1. And then the supernatants and lysates of the cells were collected at 24, 36, and 48 h postinfection (hpi) for further analysis.

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from cells using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), reverse transcription was accomplished with PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. And then the samples were subjected to real-time PCR analysis with specific primers by using a Fast Start Universal SYBR Green Master Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) on a 7500 fast RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Relative analysis of gene expression was evaluated using the 2−ΔΔCT method, in which target gene expression was normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression. Primers are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Primers used for qPCR.

Primers Sequences (5′ to 3′) Amplicon Size Final Concentration
ORF7-F AAACCAGTCCAGAGGCAAGG 221 0.3 µM
ORF7-R GCAAACTAAACTCCACAGTGTAA
IFI16-F TGTGAATGGGGTGTTTGAGGT 169 0.3 µM
IFI16-R CGGTGCCAATTCAAAGCAGG
IFN-β-F ACGGCTCTTTCCATGAGCTAC 185 0.3 µM
IFN-β-R GTCAATGCAGCGTCCTCCTT
ISG15-F CTGAAGGCAAAGATCGCCCA 186 0.3 µM
ISG15-R GTCGTTCCTCACCAGGATGC
ISG56-F AGGAAACACCCACTTCGGTC 100 0.3 µM
ISG56-R CCTCTAGGCTGCCCTTTTGT
MAVS-F CTGCCTCACAGCAAGAGACCA 181 0.3 µM
MAVS-R GTAGACACAGGCCACTTCGTC
GAPDH-F GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCA 133 0.3 µM
GAPDH-R CATGTAAACCATGTAGTTGAGGTC
Open in a new tab

2.6. Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay

MARC-145 cells in 24-well plates were transfected with indicated expression plasmids and IFN-β luciferase reporter plasmids by using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen). At 36 hpt, the cells were transfected with polyI:C (10 µg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 12 h, and then the cells were harvested and the luciferase activity was measured by using dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

2.7. Co-Immunoprecipitation

HEK-293T cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc and MAVS-3×Flag, MAVS truncations plasmids or control vector. At 48 hpt, the cells were lysed in IP-lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) for 1 h at 4 °C. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were pre-cleared with mouse IgG-Agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C for 2 h. Then, the pre-cleared supernatants were incubated with anti-c-Myc affinity gel beads or anti-Flag affinity gel beads (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h or overnight at 4 °C. The precipitates were washed five times with TBS buffer and detected by western blotting.

2.8. Virus Titration

Virus titers were determined according to a previous report [32]. Briefly, MARC-145 cells, grown in 96-well plates, were infected with ten-fold serial dilution of samples. After 1 h incubation at 37 °C, the supernatants were replaced with fresh DMEM containing 2% FBS. Five days post infection, the cytopathic effect (CPE) characterized by clumping and shrinkage of cells was obviously visible in MARC-145 cells and the viral titers, expressed as 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50), calculated according to the method of Reed-Muench [33].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical graphs were created with GraphPad Prism software, and all data were analyzed using Student’s t tests as the mean values ± the standard deviations (SD) of at least three independent experiments. The asterisks in the figures indicate significant differences (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

3. Results

3.1. IFI16 Inhibits PRRSV-2 Replication

Since type I interferon and interferon-induced genes could efficiently inhibit PRRSV replication in MARC-145 cells [21,23], and it has been reported that IFI16 could be induced by type I interferon [34,35,36], we firstly confirmed whether IFI16 could be induced by type I interferon in MARC-145 cells, and then explored whether IFI16 could inhibit PRRSV replication. MARC-145 cells were treated with IFN-β, and then the expression of IFI16 was detected. Consistent with the results of previous reports, IFN-β could also efficiently induce the expression of IFI16 (Figure 1A), and the expression of IFI16 was enhanced in an IFN-β-dose-dependent manner and peaked at 24 h in MARC-145 cells (Figure 1B). In addition, the transcription level of IFI16 was increased in the cells infected with PRRSV-2 (Figure 1C,D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Interferon gamma-inducible protein 16 (IFI16) is upregulated upon interferon-beta (IFN-β) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 2 (PRRSV-2) infection. (A) MARC-145 cells were treated with different concentrations of IFN-β, and 24 h later, the mRNA levels of IFI16 were detected by RT-qPCR. (B) MARC-145 cells were treated with IFN-β (10 ng/mL) for different times as indicated, and the mRNA levels of IFI16 were examined by RT-qPCR. (C) MARC-145 cells were infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1, the mRNA levels of IFI16 were examined at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hpi by RT-qPCR. (D) MARC-145 cells were infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at different MOIs for 24 h, the mRNA levels of IFI16 were examined by RT-qPCR. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Next, to explore whether IFI16 could inhibit PRRSV-2 replication, MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc and control vector for 24 h, and then the cells were infected with PRRSV-2 at a MOI of 0.1. The results in Figure 2 show that overexpression of IFI16 reduced the RNA levels of PRRSV (Figure 2A), the PRRSV titers (Figure 2B), and the expression levels of the N protein of PRRSV (Figure 2C,D). To further examine the antiviral effects of IFI16 on PRRSV-2, we used specific siRNA to down-regulate the expression of endogenous IFI16, which led to lower expression of IFI16 than that in cells transfected with control siRNA (Figure 3A). Compared with the nontargeting control siRNA (siNC)-transfected control cells, the RNA levels of PRRSV (Figure 3B), viral titers (Figure 3C), and the expression of N protein (Figure 3D,E) were significantly increased in MARC-145 cells transfected with siIFI16. Together, these results indicated that IFI16 acts as an antiviral protein against PRRSV-2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Overexpression of IFI16 inhibits PRRSV-2 replication. MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc or control vector for 24 h, and then infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a MOI of 0.1 for another 24, 36, and 48 h. (A) The RNA levels of PRRSV were assessed by RT-qPCR. (B) The virus titers were assayed by TCID50 (50% tissue culture infective dose). (C) The expression levels of IFI16 and N protein of PRRSV were analyzed by western blotting. (D) The relative intensity ratios of N protein were also shown in this figure by using Image J software. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of IFI16 enhances PRRSV-2 growth. (A) MARC-145 cells were transfected with siIFI16 or a nontargeting control (siNC) for 48 h, the knockdown efficiency of IFI16 was examined by RT-qPCR. (B) MARC-145 cells transfected with siIFI16 or siNC were infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a MOI of 0.1 for 24, 36, 48 h. The mRNA levels of IFI16 and PRRSV ORF7 were assessed by RT-qPCR. (C) The virus titers were analyzed by TCID50. (D) The expression levels of N protein were detected by western blotting with a rabbit anti-PRRSV N protein polyclonal antibody. (E) The relative intensity ratios of N protein were analyzed by Image J software. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

3.2. IFI16 Enhances the MAVS-mediated Type I IFN Signaling

IFI16 plays an important role in Sendai virus (SeV)-mediated production of type I IFN [30,37], and in light of the fact that PRRSV could slightly induce the production of type I IFN [31,38], we wonder whether IFI16 was useful to the transcription of type I IFN during PRRSV infection. MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc or control vector, and 24 h later, the cells were infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a MOI of 1. The results showed that IFI16 could enhance PRRSV-induced production of IFN-β (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

IFI16 enhances PRRSV-induced production of IFN-β. (A) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc or control vector and IFN-β reporter plasmid, and 24 h later, the cells were infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a MOI of 1 for 12 h or 24 h, and then the luciferase activities were assayed. (B) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc or control vector for 24 h, then infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a MOI of 1 for 12 h or 24 h, and the mRNA levels of IFN-β were measured by RT-qPCR. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Given the fact that IFI16 plays a key role in the signaling through RIG-I, and among the different RNA sensors, DExD/H-box RNA helicases of the RLR family have been identified as essential sensors of RNA viruses [15,30,39,40], we explored the role of IFI16 in the RIG-I-mediated signaling pathway. Firstly, we found that IFI16 could enhance polyI:C-induced IFN-β promoter activity and the transcriptional levels of IFN-β (Figure 5A,B). Next, to further investigate the mechanism of IFI16 in enhancing type I IFN signaling, MARC-145 cells were co-transfected with plasmids encoding IFI16, components of RIG-I pathway, and IFN-β reporter plasmid. The results showed that IFI16 greatly enhanced the IFN-β promoter activity, the mRNA transcriptional levels of IFN-β, ISG15, and ISG56 induced by MAVS (Figure 5C–F). Subsequently, cells were co-transfected with MAVS, IFN-β reporter plasmid, and different concentrations of IFI16, and the results showed that IFI16 strongly increased MAVS-mediated IFN-β promoter activity and the mRNA transcription levels of IFN-β, ISG15, and ISG56 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5G–J).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

IFI16 enhances MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling. (A) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFN-β reporter plasmid and IFI16-Myc or control vector, and 36 h later, the cells were transfected with polyI:C (10 µg/mL) for 12 h, and then the luciferase activities were assayed. (B) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc or control vector for 36 h, then transfected with polyI:C for 12 h, the mRNA levels of IFN-β were measured by RT-qPCR. (C) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFN-β reporter plasmid, IFI16-Myc, and IRF3, MAVS, TBK1, RIG-I, or MDA5 plasmids. Luciferase assays were performed at 48 h. (D–F) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc and IRF3, MAVS, TBK1, RIG-I, or MDA5 plasmids. The mRNA levels of IFN-β (D), ISG15 (E), and ISG56 (F) were detected by RT-qPCR. (G) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFN-β reporter plasmid, MAVS, and increasing amounts of IFI16-Myc, at 48 hpt, the luciferase activities were analyzed using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. (H–J) MARC-145 cells were transfected with MAVS and increasing amounts of IFI16-Myc, the mRNA levels of IFN-β (H), ISG15 (I), and ISG56 (J) were detected by RT-qPCR. (K) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFN-β reporter plasmid, IFI16-Myc, and siNC or siMAVS for 36 h, then the cells were stimulated with polyI:C, and 12 h later, the luciferase activities were assayed. (L) MARC-145 cells were transfected with IFI16-Myc and siNC or siMAVS for 36 h, and then the cells were stimulated with polyI:C, and 12 h later, the mRNA levels of IFN-β were quantified by RT-qPCR. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Since IFI16 could enhance MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling, to identify whether MAVS is indispensable for IFI16 to regulate the production of type I IFN, MARC-145 cells were transfected with siMAVS, IFI16-Myc, and IFN-β reporter plasmid, and 36 h later, the cells were stimulated with polyI:C. And the results showed that IFI16 could not promote polyI:C-induced type I IFN production upon silencing of MAVS (Figure 5K,L). Collectively, these data indicated that IFI16 positively regulates MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling.

3.3. IFI16 Interacts with MAVS

IFI16 is mainly localized in nucleus and partially localized in cytoplasmic and mitochondria [29], while MAVS could localize in cytoplasmic and mitochondria [41]. Besides, IFI16 could facilitate the MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling, so to determine whether IFI16 could interact with MAVS, the co-immunoprecipitation assays (co-IP) were performed in 293T cells, and the results showed that IFI16 specifically interacted with MAVS (Figure 6A,B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

IFI16 interacts with MAVS. (A,B) HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with IFI16-Myc and MAVS-3×Flag for 48 h. Cells were lysed, and the lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation and analyzed by western blotting using indicated antibodies. (C) Scheme of MAVS protein and its mutants. (D) HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with IFI16-Myc and MAVS-3×Flag, MAVS-1-3×Flag, MAVS-2-3×Flag, MAVS-3-3×Flag, p3×Flag-CMV-7.1, and 48 h later, the cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation and analyzed by western blotting.

As a central adaptor of IFN signaling, MAVS contains an N-terminal CARD domain, a proline-rich domain, and a C-terminal transmembrane domain (TM) [42,43]. So, to determine the functions of MAVS domains in the binding with IFI16, a series of MAVS truncations were generated (Figure 6C). In the assays of co-IP, IFI16 only interacted with full-length MAVS, but not with truncations of MAVS (Figure 6D). These results indicated that the CARD domain and TM domain of MAVS are sufficient and efficient for the binding with IFI16.

3.4. Antiviral Activity of IFI16 is Dependent on MAVS

Since IFI16 possesses significant antiviral activity and enhances MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling, to investigate whether the antiviral activity of IFI16 is dependent on MAVS, we silenced MAVS using siRNAs, and as shown in Figure 7, marked reduction of MAVS expression was observed in the MAVS silenced cells (Figure 7A,B). And, IFI16 could not decrease the PRRSV RNA levels (Figure 7C), PRRSV titers (Figure 7D), and the expression of N protein of PRRSV (Figure 7E–G) in the MAVS-silenced cells. These data indicated that the anti-PRRSV activity of IFI16 needs the involvement of MAVS.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

The antiviral activity of IFI16 is dependent on MAVS. (A,B) MARC-145 cells were transfected with siMAVS or siNC for 48 h, the silence efficiency of MAVS was examined by RT-qPCR and western blotting. (C) MARC-145 cells were transfected with siMAVS and IFI16-Myc, and 24 h later, and the cells were infected with PRRSV-2 BJ-4 at a MOI of 0.1 for 24 h. Then, the cells were harvested, and RNA levels of PRRSV were determined by RT-qPCR. (D) The virus titers from cell supernatants were analyzed by TCID50. (E) The expression levels of N protein were detected by western blotting. (F,G) The relative intensity ratios of MAVS and N protein were analyzed using Image J software. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

4. Discussion

In this study, we revealed a novel mechanism by which IFI16 inhibits PRRSV-2 replication. Initially, we showed that IFI16 could efficiently repress PRRSV-2 replication. Subsequently, we demonstrated that IFI16 markedly enhances MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling and binds directly with MAVS. Finally, the ability of IFI16 to antagonize the replication of PRRSV-2 is dependent on MAVS. Taken together, these findings suggest that IFI16 plays an important role in response to PRRSV-2 in MARC-145 cells.

IFI16 is an intracellular DNA sensor and could mediate the induction of IFN-β by stimulating with single-stranded and double-stranded DNA sequences or DNA virus infection [29]. And IFI16 has also been described as an antiviral restriction factor against DNA viruses since it could directly interact with DNA virus components and block viral replication [44,45]. Besides, IFI16 plays a broader role in the regulation of the type I IFN response to DNA viruses in antiviral immunity [30]. However, the functions of IFI16 in regulating RNA virus including PRRSV replication are largely unknown. In this study, we provide the first evidence that IFI16 could inhibit PRRSV-2 replication in MARC-145 cells. Additionally, IFI16 is widely expressed in endothelial and epithelial cells [46], and although the roles of IFI16 in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) currently could not be investigated, this study may have implications for other RNA viruses.

It has been reported that IFI16 was essential for SeV-mediated production of type I IFN [30,37], and SeV-mediated induction of type I IFN comes primarily from RIG-I activation [39,40,47], which indicated that IFI16 may be involved in regulating the RIG-I signal pathway. Here, we have shown that IFI16 could interact with MAVS and promote MAVS-mediated type I IFN signaling, and MAVS was essential for IFI16 to regulate type I IFN signaling. MAVS is a central adaptor protein for RIG-I signaling pathway, which indicted that IFI16 may positively regulate RIG-I signaling pathway. Given that IFI16 transcriptionally regulates ISGs to enhance IFN responses to DNA viruses [29,30], this may be a common mechanism in response to DNA or RNA viruses, which needs further demonstration in other PRRSV strains, and even other RNA viruses.

Since PRRSV could be recognized by RIG-I and induce the production of type I IFN [31,38], and IFI16 could positively regulate the RIG-I signaling pathway, we explored the mechanism by which IFI16 inhibits PRRSV-2 replication. We found that IFI16 could facilitate the PRRSV-mediated induction of IFN-β, interact with MAVS, and the anti-PRRSV activity of IFI16 is dependent on MAVS, which indicted that the ability of IFI16 to inhibit PRRSV-2 replication may be relevant to its role in the type I IFN signaling. Interestingly, IFI16 expression was increased after PRRSV infection, while possibly inhibiting virus replication. However, the mechanisms underlying need to be explored further.

In fact, in contrast to the results that IFI16 plays an important role in SeV-mediated production of type I IFN [30], several other groups have shown that both knockout and knockdown of IFI16 could not influence the ployI:C and SeV-mediated production of type I interferon [26,29,48]. The reason of these different results may be due to different cell lines they used. Here, we showed another piece of evidence that IFI16 may take part in the RIG-I signaling pathway. Previous studies have shown that STING could interact with RIG-I and MAVS, and there was also a marked reduction in the induction of IFN-β by RIG-I and MAVS in the absence of STING [49,50], while Brunette et al. have shown that the IFN response to poly(dA:dT) was reduced by >99% in STING−/−, MAVS−/− macrophages, and DCs, but not in phagocytes deficient in STING alone [51], which indicated that IFI16 may be a crosstalk between RIG-I-MAVS-type I interferon and STING-DNA-sensing pathways [52]. It is well known that IFI16 recruits STING to induce IFN-β transcription, so the roles of IFI16 in the crosstalk between RIG-I-MAVS-RNA-sensing pathways and IFI16-STING-DNA-sensing pathways need further studies.

In conclusion, our data show for the first time that IFI16 could inhibit PRRSV-2 replication in a MAVS-dependent manner, which may have implications for other RNA viruses and contribute to understand the antiviral mechanism, as well as virus–host interactions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hanchun Yang for providing us with PRRSV strain BJ-4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C., X.S., and G.Z.; Data curation, X.C., X.S., and G.Z.; Methodology, X.C., X.S., E.Z., and G.Z.; Formal analysis, X.C., X.S., and G.Z.; Funding acquisition, X.S., A.W., and G.Z.; Investigation, X.C. and X.S.; resources, G.Z.; supervision, X.L., R.D., and G.Z.; project administration, G.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C.; writing—review and editing, X.S., X.Z., L.W., and G.Z.

Funding

This research was funded by the key project of National Natural Science Fund (31490600), Henan Natural Science Foundation (182300410077), Henan Normal University Outstanding Youth Science Fund (20170031), Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Ministry of Agriculture, Henan Province Animal Immunology Key Laboratory Open Project (PKLAI20170605), the key scientific research projects of Henan provincial institution of higher education (16A180008, 17A180006), and National Foundation of China (31472177).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to publish the results.

References

  • 1.Nieuwenhuis N., Duinhof T.F., van Nes A. Economic analysis of outbreaks of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in nine sow herds. Vet. Rec. 2012;170:225. doi: 10.1136/vr.100101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pejsak Z., Stadejek T., Markowska-Daniel I. Clinical signs and economic losses caused by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a large breeding farm. Vet. Microbiol. 1997;55:317–322. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(96)01326-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Albina E. Epidemiology of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS): An overview. Vet. Microbiol. 1997;55:309–316. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(96)01322-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cavanagh D. Nidovirales: A new order comprising Coronaviridae and Arteriviridae. Arch. Virol. 1997;142:629–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Music N., Gagnon C.A. The role of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus structural and non-structural proteins in virus pathogenesis. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2010;11:135–163. doi: 10.1017/S1466252310000034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnson C.R., Griggs T.F., Gnanandarajah J., Murtaugh M.P. Novel structural protein in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus encoded by an alternative ORF5 present in all arteriviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2011;92:1107–1116. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.030213-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Allende R., Lewis T.L., Lu Z., Rock D.L., Kutish G.F., Ali A., Doster A.R., Osorio F.A. North American and European porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses differ in non-structural protein coding regions. J. Gen. Virol. 1999;80:307–315. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-80-2-307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nelsen C.J., Murtaugh M.P., Faaberg K.S. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus comparison: Divergent evolution on two continents. J. Virol. 1999;73:270–280. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.1.270-280.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuhn J.H., Lauck M., Bailey A.L., Shchetinin A.M., Vishnevskaya T.V., Bao Y., Ng T.F., LeBreton M., Schneider B.S., Gillis A., et al. Reorganization and expansion of the nidoviral family Arteriviridae. Arch. Virol. 2016;161:755–768. doi: 10.1007/s00705-015-2672-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adams M.J., Lefkowitz E.J., King A.M., Harrach B., Harrison R.L., Knowles N.J., Kropinski A.M., Krupovic M., Kuhn J.H., Mushegian A.R., et al. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2016) Arch. Virol. 2016;161:2921–2949. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-2977-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kappes M.A., Faaberg K.S. PRRSV structure, replication and recombination: Origin of phenotype and genotype diversity. Virology. 2015;479–480:475–486. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lunney J.K., Fang Y., Ladinig A., Chen N., Li Y., Rowland B., Renukaradhya G.J. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV): Pathogenesis and Interaction with the Immune System. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2016;4:129–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bowie A.G., Unterholzner L. Viral evasion and subversion of pattern-recognition receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:911–922. doi: 10.1038/nri2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nakhaei P., Genin P., Civas A., Hiscott J. RIG-I-like receptors: Sensing and responding to RNA virus infection. Semin. Immunol. 2009;21:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chan Y.K., Gack M.U. Viral evasion of intracellular DNA and RNA sensing. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:360–373. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma Z., Ni G., Damania B. Innate Sensing of DNA Virus Genomes. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2018;5:341–362. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schneider W.M., Chevillotte M.D., Rice C.M. Interferon-stimulated genes: A complex web of host defenses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014;32:513–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Albina E., Carrat C., Charley B. Interferon-alpha response to swine arterivirus (PoAV), the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 1998;18:485–490. doi: 10.1089/jir.1998.18.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Overend C., Mitchell R., He D., Rompato G., Grubman M.J., Garmendia A.E. Recombinant swine beta interferon protects swine alveolar macrophages and MARC-145 cells from infection with Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2007;88:925–931. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82585-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shi X., Zhang X., Wang L., Li W., Jiang B., Deng R., Wang A., Zhang G. Recombinant beta interferon could clear the low-dose infected porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in MARC-145 cells. Acta Virol. 2016;60:290–297. doi: 10.4149/av_2016_03_290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luo R., Fang L., Jin H., Jiang Y., Wang D., Chen H., Xiao S. Antiviral activity of type I and type III interferons against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) Antivir. Res. 2011;91:99–101. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bautista E.M., Molitor T.W. IFN gamma inhibits porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication in macrophages. Arch Virol. 1999;144:1191–1200. doi: 10.1007/s007050050578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao J., Feng N., Li Z., Wang P., Qi Z., Liang W., Zhou X., Xu X., Liu B. 2′,5′-Oligoadenylate synthetase 1(OAS1) inhibits PRRSV replication in Marc-145 cells. Antivir. Res. 2016;132:268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang H., Bai J., Fan B., Li Y., Zhang Q., Jiang P. The Interferon-Induced Mx2 Inhibits Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Replication. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2016;36:129–139. doi: 10.1089/jir.2015.0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gariano G.R., Dell’Oste V., Bronzini M., Gatti D., Luganini A., De Andrea M., Gribaudo G., Gariglio M., Landolfo S. The intracellular DNA sensor IFI16 gene acts as restriction factor for human cytomegalovirus replication. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002498. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Orzalli M.H., DeLuca N.A., Knipe D.M. Nuclear IFI16 induction of IRF-3 signaling during herpesviral infection and degradation of IFI16 by the viral ICP0 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E3008–E3017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211302109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jakobsen M.R., Paludan S.R. IFI16: At the interphase between innate DNA sensing and genome regulation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2014;25:649–655. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dell’Oste V., Gatti D., Giorgio A.G., Gariglio M., Landolfo S., De Andrea M. The interferon-inducible DNA-sensor protein IFI16: A key player in the antiviral response. New Microbiol. 2015;38:5–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Unterholzner L., Keating S.E., Baran M., Horan K.A., Jensen S.B., Sharma S., Sirois C.M., Jin T., Latz E., Xiao T.S., et al. IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:997–1004. doi: 10.1038/ni.1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thompson M.R., Sharma S., Atianand M., Jensen S.B., Carpenter S., Knipe D.M., Fitzgerald K.A., Kurt-Jones E.A. Interferon gamma-inducible protein (IFI) 16 transcriptionally regulates type i interferons and other interferon-stimulated genes and controls the interferon response to both DNA and RNA viruses. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:23568–23581. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.554147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shi X., Wang L., Zhi Y., Xing G., Zhao D., Deng R., Zhang G. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) could be sensed by professional beta interferon-producing system and had mechanisms to inhibit this action in MARC-145 cells. Virus Res. 2010;153:151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chang X.B., Yang Y.Q., Gao J.C., Zhao K., Guo J.C., Ye C., Jiang C.G., Tian Z.J., Cai X.H., Tong G.Z., et al. Annexin A2 binds to vimentin and contributes to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus multiplication. Vet. Res. 2018;49:75. doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0571-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reed L.J., Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1938;27:493–497. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118408. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Clarke C.J., Apostolidis V., Hii L.L., Gough D.J., Trapani J.A., Johnstone R.W. Critical role of the transcription factor AP-1 for the constitutive and interferon-induced expression of IFI 16. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003;89:80–93. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baggetta R., De Andrea M., Gariano G.R., Mondini M., Ritta M., Caposio P., Cappello P., Giovarelli M., Gariglio M., Landolfo S. The interferon-inducible gene IFI16 secretome of endothelial cells drives the early steps of the inflammatory response. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:2182–2189. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dawson M.J., Trapani J.A. IFI 16 gene encodes a nuclear protein whose expression is induced by interferons in human myeloid leukaemia cell lines. J. Cell. Biochem. 1995;57:39–51. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240570106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Orzalli M.H., Broekema N.M., Diner B.A., Hancks D.C., Elde N.C., Cristea I.M., Knipe D.M. cGAS-mediated stabilization of IFI16 promotes innate signaling during herpes simplex virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E1773–E1781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424637112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xie S., Chen X.X., Qiao S., Li R., Sun Y., Xia S., Wang L.J., Luo X., Deng R., Zhou E.M., et al. Identification of the RNA Pseudoknot within the 3′ End of the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Genome as a Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern To Activate Antiviral Signaling via RIG-I and Toll-Like Receptor 3. J. Virol. 2018;92 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00097-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rehwinkel J., Tan C.P., Goubau D., Schulz O., Pichlmair A., Bier K., Robb N., Vreede F., Barclay W., Fodor E., et al. RIG-I detects viral genomic RNA during negative-strand RNA virus infection. Cell. 2010;140:397–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baum A., Sachidanandam R., Garcia-Sastre A. Preference of RIG-I for short viral RNA molecules in infected cells revealed by next-generation sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:16303–16308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005077107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Seth R.B., Sun L., Ea C.K., Chen Z.J. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell. 2005;122:669–682. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Belgnaoui S.M., Paz S., Hiscott J. Orchestrating the interferon antiviral response through the mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) adapter. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011;23:564–572. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang X., Zhu C., Wang T., Jiang H., Ren Y., Zhang Q., Wu K., Liu F., Liu Y., Wu J. GP73 represses host innate immune response to promote virus replication by facilitating MAVS and TRAF6 degradation. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006321. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lo Cigno I., De Andrea M., Borgogna C., Albertini S., Landini M.M., Peretti A., Johnson K.E., Chandran B., Landolfo S., Gariglio M. The Nuclear DNA Sensor IFI16 Acts as a Restriction Factor for Human Papillomavirus Replication through Epigenetic Modifications of the Viral Promoters. J. Virol. 2015;89:7506–7520. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00013-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao H., Gonzalezgugel E., Cheng L., Richbourgh B., Nie L., Liu C. The roles of interferon-inducible p200 family members IFI16 and p204 in innate immune responses, cell differentiation and proliferation. Genes Dis. 2015;2:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liao J.C., Lam R., Brazda V., Duan S., Ravichandran M., Ma J., Xiao T., Tempel W., Zuo X., Wang Y.X., et al. Interferon-inducible protein 16: Insight into the interaction with tumor suppressor p53. Structure. 2011;19:418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Martinez-Gil L., Goff P.H., Hai R., Garcia-Sastre A., Shaw M.L., Palese P. A Sendai virus-derived RNA agonist of RIG-I as a virus vaccine adjuvant. J. Virol. 2013;87:1290–1300. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02338-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Almine J.F., O’Hare C.A., Dunphy G., Haga I.R., Naik R.J., Atrih A., Connolly D.J., Taylor J., Kelsall I.R., Bowie A.G., et al. IFI16 and cGAS cooperate in the activation of STING during DNA sensing in human keratinocytes. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14392. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ishikawa H., Barber G.N. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature. 2008;455:674–678. doi: 10.1038/nature07317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhong B., Yang Y., Li S., Wang Y.Y., Li Y., Diao F., Lei C., He X., Zhang L., Tien P., et al. The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. Immunity. 2008;29:538–550. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brunette R.L., Young J.M., Whitley D.G., Brodsky I.E., Malik H.S., Stetson D.B. Extensive evolutionary and functional diversity among mammalian AIM2-like receptors. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:1969–1983. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zevini A., Olagnier D., Hiscott J. Crosstalk between Cytoplasmic RIG-I and STING Sensing Pathways. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:194–205. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Viruses are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES