Correction to: BMC Genomics (2019) 20:907
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6257-1
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors noted an error in Fig. 11. Due to a figure processing error two labels were mistakenly retained in the original figure. They are highlighted in red boxes in the erroneous figure below:
Fig. 11.

Proposed model describing the mechanism of resistance response occurring in PA99N82–4 that contains Meloidogyne chitwoodi resistance introgressed from Solanum bulbocastanum. PAMP-triggered immunity is indicated in orange, effector-triggered immunity is indicated in blue and other secondary processes are indicated in black
Fig. 11.

Proposed model describing the mechanism of resistance response occurring in PA99N82–4 that contains Meloidogyne chitwoodi resistance introgressed from Solanum bulbocastanum. PAMP-triggered immunity is indicated in orange, effector-triggered immunity is indicated in blue and other secondary processes are indicated in black
The correct figure is:
The original article has been corrected.
Reference
- 1.Bali S, et al. Transcriptome profiling of resistance response to Meloidogyne chitwoodi introgressed from wild species Solanum bulbocastanum into cultivated potato. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:907. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6257-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
