Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ logoLink to Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ
. 2019 Dec 7;28(1):95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.010

Antibacterial, antioxidant and enzyme inhibition activity capacities of Doronicum macrolepis (FREYN&SINT): An endemic plant from Turkey

Kadriye Özcan 1,⁎
PMCID: PMC6950946  PMID: 31920435

Abstract

In the present study, the antioxidant, enzyme inhibition (α-amylase, α-glucosidase, and cholinesterase) and antimicrobial (MIC) activities of three different solvent (ethanol, methanol, or ethyl acetate) extracts of stem, root, and flower of Doronicum macrolepis plant were investigated. In addition to this, the chemical composition and the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil were determined. Antioxidant activity was detected using ABTS and DPPH assays. Antimicrobial activity evaluated by microdilution method against to nineteen microorganisms. Also, enzyme inhibition activities were determined by colorimetric methods. Essential oil of the plant extracted by hydrodistilation and characterized using GC/MS. The antioxidant properties of the flower were determined to be higher than those of the other segments of this plant. Moreover, the total phenolic and flavonoid contents were also found to be higher in the flower parts. The highest enzyme inhibition activity was observed to be α-amylase (221.54 mmol ACAE/g extract) in flower ethylacetate extract, α-glucosidase (15.32 mmol ACAE/g extract) in flower ethanol extract, and cholinesterase (AChE: 2.4 and BChE: 22.35 mg GALE/g extract) in stem ethylacetate extract. Besides them, the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil was found to be higher than the extracts. It showed a high level of inhibition especially on E. coli at 4 µg/ml concentration. Moreover, remarkable inhibition was observed for two candida strains tested. In conclusion, the results suggest that, because of its bioactivity including the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibition properties, the D. macrolepis can be accepted as a promising and natural source for the industrial applications. The present study is the first study, in which the bioactive components and the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibition properties of endemic D. macrolepis plant were determined.

Keywords: Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Doronicum macrolepis, Enzyme inhibitory activity

1. Introduction

Thanks to the rapidly advancing technology, the living standards of the people have significantly increased and, thus, the average life has prolonged. Besides that, the prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease has increased depending on the aging (Qiu and Folstein, 2006).

Diabetes (hyperglycemia) is an endocrinal disease incorporating the disorders in carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism and arising from the deterioration in insulin secretion or its activity in the target cell. It is known that this disease is very common throughout the world and it is projected that the prevalence of this disease will increase in forthcoming years (Zhu, 2013, World Health Organization (WHO), 2016, Alam et al., 2019). On the other hand, the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a lethal and neurodegenerative disease that arises with the symptoms such as loss of memory, cognitive disorders, and dementia and it is projected that the number of peoples influenced by the AD will increase in near future (Brookmeyer et al., 2007, Wu et al., 2019). It was reported that these diseases might be cured by inhibiting specific enzymes (Bahadori et al., 2019). From this aspect, the inhibition of the key enzymes related with the disorder is considered to be an effective method for eliminating these disorders (Bahadori et al., 2017). However, the synthetic medications used in inhibiting these key enzymes have many adverse effects (Chiasson, et al., 2002, Lasano et al., 2019). In order to overcome this problem, the researchers initiated incentives aiming to find an alternative natural product that has less or no adverse effect. Within this context, the plants became more popular among the studies on natural bioactive compounds (Denev et al., 2019). In the previous studies, it was reported that, with the secondary metabolites they have, the plants are responsible many biological activities including the antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and enzyme inhibition activities (Echiburu-Chau et al., 2017, Demirci et al., 2017, Djihane et al., 2017, Özcan and Acet, 2018, Alothman et al., 2018, Saleem et al., 2019a, Saleem et al., 2019b, Elansary et al., 2019, Borah et al., 2019).

Under favor of its various height and climate conditions, Turkey has a highly diversified flora and many of these plants are aromatic and widely used by the public in treating various diseases (Altindal, 2019). Besides that, the information about which parts of these plants should be used in treating which disorder and how to use them is very limited. For this reason, it is very important to support the traditionally used plants with new studies and scientific knowledge and to develop new natural and healthy products against the damages of synthetic products.

Asteraceae is the largest flowering plant family and it consists of 27 taxa, 15 of which are endemic and widely found in Anatolia (Davis et al., 1988, Güner et al., 2000). It is known that the Asteraceae species are used for nourishing and medical purposes in extract and essential oil forms (Roig, 1965, Denisow-Pietrzyk et al., 2019, Kladar et al., 2015). Doronicum macrolepis Freyn. & Sint is an endemic species belonging to that family and is widely used in treating various diseases in folk medicine (Edmondson et al., 1975). In literature, there are few studies on D. macrolepis (Akpinar et al., 2009) but no study on the biological activities of this plant was found.

The objective of the present study is to reveal the phytochemical profile of the essential oil of D. macrolepis, as well as determining the biological activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibition (α-amylase, α-glucosidase, acetylcholinesterase, and butyrylcholinesterase). The present study is the first comprehensive study carried out on the biological activities of D. macrolepis, which is an endemic species.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant material

Doronicum macrolepis Freyn & Sint (Asteraceae) plants were collected in August 2017 from Artabel/Gümüşhane at 2800–2900 m altitude during the blooming season. The identification of this plant was performed according to ‘Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands’ (Davis, 1965). By preparing witness herbarium sample, it was kept in Gümüşhane University (Turkey) (TA1703).

2.2. Preparation of the extract

The plants dried at shadow were ground to powder form. The extraction was performed by using ethanol, methanol, or ethyl acetate. 10 g plant powder was added to 200 ml solvent and shaken at 125 rpm for 8 h at the temperature not exceeding beyond 40 °C. Then, it was filtered in order to remove the plant particles. The solvent was removed from the filtrate by using vacuum and evaporator at the temperature not exceeding 40 °C, and the raw extracts were achieved. The extracts were stored at −20 °C for the experiments.

2.3. Essential oil isolation

The essential oil of the plant was obtained in 3 h by using the hydro-distillation method with a Clevenger-type apparatus. 200 g ground plant and 800 ml pure water were used for the extraction. The essential oil that was obtained was stored at −20 °C and in a dark environment until used in analyses.

2.4. GC-FID and GC–MS analysis

Gas Chromotography (GC) analysis was performed with HP-5 MS capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm) and HP 5973 mass selective detector Hewlett Packard 6890 N model GC-FID and GC–MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer). For detection of GC–MS, electron ionization system with 70 eV ionization energy was used. Helium was used as the carrier gas and the flow rate was set at 1 ml/min. In the splitless method 1.0 µL diluted sample (1/100 hexane, v/v) was injected automatically (Kaya et al., 2017). The characterization of the components in the essential oil is made using electronic libraries (Adams, Wiley, NIST)

2.5. Determining the total phenolic and flavonoid contents

The total phenolic content was determined by using the Folin-Ciocalteu method and the total flavonoid content was determined spectrally by using AlCl3 method (Slinkard and Singleton, 1977, Moreno et al., 2000, Özcan and Acet, 2018). The total phenolic content was expressed as gallic acid equivalent and the total flavonoid content as quercetin equivalent.

2.6. Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant activity was determined by making minor modifications in ABTS (Re et al., 1999) and DPPH (Kirby and Schmidt) methods. In sum, for the DPPH assay, 125 μL plant extract was mixed with 0.1 mM DPPH solution at the same volume and the measurement was made at 490 nm after waiting for 45 min. For the ABTS assay, 80 μL plant extract was mixed with 160 μL ABTS solution and the measurement was performed at 750 nm after waiting for 6 min. In both methods, the results were expressed as trolox equivalent.

2.7. Enzyme inhibition activity

2.7.1. α-Amylase inhibition

The α-Amylase inhibition activity was determined by using Caraway-Somogyi iodure/ potassium iodide (IKI) method (Yang et al., 2012). The sample solutions (25 µL) were mixed with α-amylase solution (50 µL) in phosphate buffer (pH 6.9, 6 mM sodium chloride) on micro-plate with 96 wells. The mixture was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. After the preliminary incubation, the reaction was initiated after adding starch solution (50 µL, 0.05%). Similarly, a blind solution containing no enzyme was prepared. The reaction mixture was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C and the reaction was stopped after adding HCl (25 µL, 1 M). Then, the iodine–potassium iodide (100 µL) solution was added. The samples and blank absorbance values were read at 630 nm. The results of α-amylase inhibition activity were expressed as acarbose equivalent.

2.7.2. α-Glucosidase inhibition

The α-Glucosidase inhibition activity was determined by making minor modifications in the method of Palanisamy et al. (2011). The sample solution (50 µL), glutathione (50 µL), α-glucosidase solution (50 µL), phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and PNPG (4-Nitrophenyl β-D-glucuronide) (50 µL) solvent were mixed on a micro-plate with 96 wells and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C temperature. Similarly, a blank specimen containing no enzyme was prepared. The reaction was stopped after adding sodium carbonate (50 µL, 0.2 M). The sample and blind absorbance values were read at 400 nm. The α-glucosidase inhibition activity was expressed as acarbose equivalent.

2.7.3. Anticholinesterase activity

The cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition activity was determined by making minor modifications in Ellman’s method (Zengin et al., 2014). In sum, the sample solution (50 µL), DTNB (125 µL), and anticholinesterase (or butyrylcholinesterase) solution (25 µL) was mixed in Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). Then, it was incubated for 15 min in a microplate with 96 wells at 25 °C. The reaction was initiated by adding acetylcholine iodure (or butyrylcholine iodure). Similarly, a blank mixture containing no enzyme was prepared. The absorbance values of the samples and blank specimens were read at 405 nm after 10 min of incubation at 25 °C. The cholinesterase inhibition activity was expressed as galanthamine equivalent.

2.8. Antimicrobial activity

2.8.1. Test organisms

The antimicrobial activities of the plant against 19 standard microorganisms were determined by using the micro-dilution method. The test organisms used were Enterococcus faecium DSMZ 13590, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Bacillus cereus RSKK 709, MRSA ATCC 43300, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Enterococcus hirae ATCC 10541, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria innocua ATCC 33090, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Salmonella typhimurium CCM 5445, Escherichia coli ATCC 29998, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Vibrio parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802, Yersinia enterocolitica ATCC 27729, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis ATCC 911, Proteus vulgaris ATCC 13315, Candida albicans DSMZ 5817, Candida tropicalis NRRLL YB-366.

2.8.2. Minimum inhibition concentration

The minimum inhibition concentrations of the samples were determined by using broth dilution method (CLSI, 2017) on a microtiter plate (with 96 wells). The samples were dissolved in DMSO and the obtained serial dilution concentration was used for determining 0.512–0.001 mg/ml MIC values. First of all, the samples were added to the wells at determined concentrations, and then the suspensions of the test microorganisms (0.5 MacFarland) inoculated to the wells. After 48 h of incubation, the microbial growth was determined by using a microplate absorbance reader. The MIC value was reported as the lowest plant extract concentration preventing the microbial growth. Chloramphenicol, novobiocin, nalidixic acid, and nystatin were used as positive control.

2.9. Statistical analyses

The statistical analyses were conducted after the experiments and the results were expressed as mean values ± SD of the triplicated measurements. ANOVA was used in order to identify the variations between various extracts (p < 0.05). The statistical calculations were carried out by SPSS version 20.0 programs (IBM).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Phytochemical composition

In the present study, the total bioactive components of the flower, stem, and root extracts of the plant were spectrophotometrically examined in terms of the total phenolic and flavonoid contents. According to the results obtained, the highest total phenolic content was found in flower ethyl acetate extract, followed by the flower ethanol extract and the flower methanol extract. The total flavonoid content of the flower ethanol extract was higher than the other extracts (Table 1). Moreover, the essential oil was obtained by using the hydro-distillation method and the phytochemical composition was determined by using GC/GC–MS (Table 2). The oil was found to contain high amounts of (E,E)-α-Farnesene (21.5%), trans-β-Ocimen (12.8%), δ-Cadinene (9.5%), Caryophyllene oxide (8.2%), and thymol (4.4%). The essential oil content of the flower and stem parts of D. macrolepis collected from a different region (Akpınar et al., 2009) was reported to have a similar phytochemical profile, whereas the percentages of the compounds were found to be different. These differences in chemical composition were thought to be because of various factors such as the ecological conditions under which the plants were collected (Salehi et al., 2018), the collection timing, and the extracting method (Moghtader and Afzali, 2009, Çeliktaş et al., 2007, Okoh et al., 2010).

Table 1.

Total bioactive components of the extracts.

Plant parts Extracts Total phenolic content (TPC) (mg GAE/g extract) Total flavonoid content (TFC) (mg QE/g extract)
Flower Ethanol 273.8 ± 0.7b 123.2 ± 0.5a
Methanol 103.6 ± 1.3c 43.9 ± 1.5b
Ethylacetate 569.6 ± 2.9a 32.9 ± 1.6c



Stem Ethanol 48.5 ± 1.3g 19.3 ± 1.2d
Methanol 56.5 ± 0.8f 34.5 ± 0.8c
Ethylacetate 94.7 ± 1.3d 44.6 ± 3.5b



Root Ethanol 64.5 ± 0.6e 8.6 ± 0.3e
Methanol 48.8 ± 1.4g 6.9 ± 0.2e
Ethylacetate 40.2 ± 1.7h 7.6 ± 0.3e
Open in a new tab

*Values expressed are means ± SD of three different measurements. GAE, gallic acid equivalents; QE, quercetin equivalents. The data shown with different letters in the same column refer to statistically significant differences between the extracts (p < 0.05).

Table 2.

Phytochemical composition of the essential oil of the plant.

No compounds % area RI RI literature
1 n-Hexanal 0.9 773 780
2 2-Hexenal 0.4 844 847
3 Fenchene 0.1 957 953
4 2-Heptenal, (Z)- 0.2 970 964
5 Benzaldehyde 0.2 972 968
6 β-Thujene 0.4 988 987
7 β-Pinene 0.2 990 991
8 Furan, 2-pentyl- 2.5 1010 1001
9 α-Phellandrene 0.3 1023 1014
10 3-Carene 0.3 1029 1025
11 o-Cymene 0.6 1047 1036
12 β-Phellandrene 2.7 1051 1043
13 Eucalyptol 0.4 1054 1049
14 trans-β-Ocimen 12.8 1063 1062
15 Hyacinthin 0.7 1069 1063
16 β-cis-Ocimene 0.5 1075 1063
17 γ-Terpinene 0.5 1086 1074
18 1-Octanol 0.7 1102 1091
19 trans-thujone 0.1 1120 1114
20 Nonanal 0.7 1139 1142
21 Camphor 0.1 1159 1146
22 p-Acetyltoluene 0.1 1179 1183
23 Ethyl caprylate 0.2 1201 1202
24 Safranal 0.4 1245 1206
25 Carvacrol 0.1 1294 1297
26 Undecanal 0.1 1309 1307
27 (2E,4E)-Decadienal 0.1 1314 1317
28 2,4-Decadienal 0.1 1318 1323
29 Thymol 4.4 1350 1318
30 α-Cubebene 6.4 1358 1352
31 α-Copaene 0.3 1375 1377
32 β-Cubebene 0.2 1384 1388
33 (E)-Caryophyllene 0.2 1411 1419
34 α-Caryophyllene 0.6 1451 1455
35 (E)-β-Farnesene 1.2 1460 1457
36 Germacrene D 0.1 1484 1485
37 Aromandendrene 1.9 1490 1441
38 (E,E)-α- Farnesene 21.5 1508 1506
39 δ-Cadinene 9.5 1531 1523
40 Caryophyllene oxide 8.2 1561 1579
41 β-Bisabolene 1.4 1577 1531
42 Oplopenone 3.7 1608 1608
43 α-Cadinol 0.3 1630 1654
44 Pentadecanal 2.7 1713 1714
45 Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone 1.4 1847 1847
46 Tricosane 1.2 2304 2300



Total area 91.2
Open in a new tab

3.2. Antioxidant activity

Scavenging the free radicals accumulating within the tissues is very important for protecting the organisms from many diseases. The free radicals play role in many diseases by causing damage and aging in the cells (Seo et al., 2019, Zhao et al., 2019). It is known that the plants have high antioxidant properties (Bahadori et al., 2019). In the present study, the in vitro antioxidant activity of Doronicum macrolepis extracts were determined by using DPH and ABTS methods, which yield economic, accurate, and exact results and are used in herbal experiments. According to the results obtained, it was determined that the highest scavenging efficiencies were observed in ABTS method for flower ethyl acetate extract (262.4 mg TE/g extract) and DPPH method for stem ethanol extract (486.5 mg TE/g extract) and root ethylacetate extracts (480.6 mg TE/g extract). Besides that, all the extracts including the stem extracts were found to have strong antioxidant activities (Table 3).

Table 3.

Antioxidant activities of the extracts.

Plant parts Extracts ABTS scavenging mg TE/g extract DPPH scavenging mg TE/g extract
Flower Ethanol 185.7 ± 1.5e 21.6 ± 0.9g
Methanol 248.6 ± 0.1b 347.5 ± 2.1d
Ethylacetate 262.4 ± 0.8a 159.1 ± 1.8f



Stem Ethanol 198.8 ± 1.6d 486.5 ± 4.0a
Methanol 101.6 ± 1.4f 273.3 ± 2.8e
Ethylacetate 248.1 ± 1.8b 347.6 ± 3.1d



Root Ethanol 249.3 ± 1.5b 371.8 ± 3.8c
Methanol 100.2 ± 1.9f 402.5 ± 3.5b
Ethylacetate 235.7 ± 2.2c 480.6 ± 2.0a
Open in a new tab

* Values expressed are means ± SD of three different measurements. TE, Trolox equivalents. The data shown with different letters in the same column refer to statistically significant differences between the extracts (p < 0.05).

When comparing Table 1, Table 3, it was determined that there was a correlation between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity determined by using ABTS method, whereas there was no correlation between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity determined by using DPPH method. Although there are similar results reported in the literature (Karadeniz et al., 2015), it was also observed that there was no correlation (Javanmardi et al., 2003, Özcan and Acet, 2018).

3.3. Enzyme inhibition activity

Diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease were among the most important global health problems. The synthetic medications are widely used in treatments of these patients. It was also revealed in studies that these chemical medications have many adverse effects on the tissues and organs. In the recent period, researchers started to investigate the potential active compounds from herbal sources, which would not cause these adverse effects (Howes and Houghton, 2003, Hu et al., 2013, Lasano et al., 2019). In the present study, the potential of plant extracts for controlling diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease was determined with in vitro methods by inhibiting the key enzymes (α-amylase, α-glucasidase for diabetes and cholinesterases for Alzeimer’ disease) playing role in the management of these disorders (Figueiredo-González et al., 2019, Shrivastava et al., 2019). The enzyme inhibition activity results of plant extracts are presented in Table 4. Accordingly, the flower ethyl acetate (221.54 mmol ACAE/g extract), flower methanol (15.32 mmol ACAE/g extract), and stem ethyl acetate (AChE = 2.4 mg GALE/g extract; BChE = 22.35 mg GALE/g extract) extracts were found to have highest α-amylase, α-glucosidase, and acetylcholinesterase inhibition activities, respectively. When considering the plant parts, it was determined that the flower ethyl acetate, stem, and root methanol extracts were found to have the highest amylase inhibition when compared to the other extracts, whereas the highest glucosidase inhibition effect was observed in flower, stem, and root methanol extracts. The root, stem, and flower ethyl acetate extracts of the plant were found to have higher cholinesterase inhibition activity when compared to the ethanol and methanol extracts. In general, the extract of plant parts (except for the stem methanol and root ethanol extracts) showed remarkable enzyme inhibition activities. Given Table 4, it was determined that there was a correlation between the cholinesterase and α-glucosidase inhibition activities and the solvent used in extraction. In many studies, it was reported that the compounds of plants such as phenolic and flavonoid contents are responsible for various biological activities. It is thought that the enzyme inhibition activity in the present study arises from the phytochemical content of the plant. Among the main compounds, the thymol was reported to have anti-diabetic (Saravanan and Pari, 2016) and cholinesterase (Duke, 2007) inhibition activity in various studies. Besides the dominant compounds, the minor compounds may also create many activities when together. In literature, no study examining the amylase, glucosidase, and cholinesterase inhibition activities of Doronicum species was found. However, the enzyme inhibition activity of many plants from the Asteraceae, which includes also Doronicum, was investigated before (Saoud et al., 2019, Uysal et al., 2018, Ascari et al., 2019, Zengin et al., 2018, Saleem et al., 2019a, Saleem et al., 2019b).

Table 4.

Enzyme inhibitory activities of the extract.

Plant parts Extracts α-amylase Inhibition (mmol ACAE/g extract) α-glucosidase Inhibition (mmol ACAE/g extract) AChE Inhibition mg GALE/g extract BChE Inhibition mg GALE/g extract
Flower Ethanol 91.38 ± 0.71ı 8.88 ± 0.02c 0.6 ± 0.05e 7.27 ± 0.05f
Methanol 218.44 ± 0.59b 15.32 ± 0.09a 0.68 ± 0.02e 7.65 ± 0.03e
Ethylacetate 221.54 ± 0.65a 7.37 ± 0.06 e 0.80 ± 0.06c 10.80 ± 0.02c



Stem Ethanol 201.86 ± 1.58c 6.58 ± 0.08g 0.74 ± 0.03d 9.46 ± 0.01d
Methanol 109.73 ± 0.36g 7.76 ± 0.17d ND 4.57 ± 0.03ı
Ethylacetate 190.24 ± 0.83d 6.86 ± 0.10f 2.4 ± 0.08a 22.35 ± 0.09a



Root Ethanol 150.57 ± 0.82e 5.23 ± 0.17ı ND 4.76 ± 0.02h
Methanol 95.03 ± 1.00h 9.13 ± 0.04b 0.4 ± 0.01f 5.51 ± 0.03g
Ethylacetate 113.43 ± 1.46f 6.23 ± 0.08h 1.06 ± 0.04b 14.41 ± 0.11b
Open in a new tab

Values expressed are means ± SD of three different measurements. ACAE, acarbose equivalents; GALE, galantamine equivalents. The data shown with different letters in the same column indicate statistically significant differences between the extracts (p < 0.05).

3.4. Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial activity of the plant extracts and oil was investigated with the microdilution method by using 17 bacteria and 2 yeast strains. It was determined that they showed weak antimicrobial activity against all the tested microorganisms (>512 µg/mL), whereas the essential oil of the plant showed remarkable activity on all the microorganisms (Table 5, Table 6). The oil showed a very strong effect on E. coli at 4 µg/mL concentration, and remarkable antimicrobial effect on S. epidermidis, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, Y. pseudotuberculosis, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis at ≤32 µg/mL concentration. These results suggest that the essential oil of this plant could be used as an antimicrobial agent. In previous studies carried out on similar species, it was reported that the essential oils of the plants showed higher antimicrobial activity when compared to the plant extracts (Politi et al., 2016, Shirazi et al., 2014, Candan et al., 2003).

Table 5.

Antibacterial activities of the essential oil.

Test organisms MIC value (µg/mL)
Volatile oil Chloromphenicol Novobiocin Nalidixic acid
E. hirae 64 8 1 256
B. cereus 128 2 1 4
S. epidermidis 32 16 4 4
S. aureus 128 64 128 32
MRSA 128 32 1 64
E. faecium 32 4 1 256
E. feacalis 512 8 4 128
L. monocytogenesis 128 16 2 256
L. innocua 128 32 2 128
S. typhimurium 128 1 512 8
V. Parahaemolyticus 128 8 512 256
P. aeruginosa 64 4 1 32
Y. enterocolitica 64 2 512 4
K. pneumoniae 128 4 2 1
E. coli 4 32 512 4
Y. pseudotuberculosis 32 16 4 4
P. vulgaris 128 16 4 8
Open in a new tab

Table 6.

Anticandidal activity of the essential oil.

Test organisms MIC value (µg/mL)
Volatile oil Chloromphenicol Nystatine Nalidixic acid
C. albicans 16 16 16 8
C. tropicalis 32 16 16 16
Open in a new tab

The results obtained here are in corroboration with the antimicrobial activity results reported in the literature for the other Doronicum species. In a similar study carried out on the antimicrobial and antitumoral activity of the ethanol, methanol, and water extracts of Doronicum orientale, both of these activities were found to be weak (Usta et al., 2014). In another study, Doronicum hookeri root dichloromethane:methanol (1:1, v/v) extract (500 µg/mL concentration) was tested and it showed inhibition only on Candida albicans among 14 microorganisms, for which it was tested (Kumar et al., 2006).

4. Conclusion

Because of the positive effects of active compounds they contain, the plants are widely used for therapeutic purposes by the humans. Diabetes and Alzheimer’s diseases are among the metabolic diseases affecting many people, and the increasing number of people suffers from the negative effects of these diseases. Although many synthetic medications are used in the management of these disorders, these medications might have undesired adverse effects. For this reason, the plants constitute an important source for the natural active compounds that have very low or no adverse effect. However, it became necessary to reveal if the plants, which are used for therapeutic purposes, have the effects that are in parallel with the intended use. The biological activity of D. macrolepis, which is an endemic plant, was determined for the first time. When considering the study results from a holistic aspect, it was found that the ethyl acetate extracts of the plant’s aboveground and belowground parts were superior to the other extracts in terms of the characteristics investigated in the present study. Besides the plant extracts, also the antimicrobial effects of the essential oil were determined and it was found that the essential oil is more effective. Moreover, since the plant has the potential of usage in the management of diseases such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease, it is thought that the further studies including purifying and revealing the active contents in order to determine the source of its biological activity.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Akpinar K., Yildirim N., Üçüncü O., Yayli N., Terzioglu S., Yayli N. Volatile Constituents of the Flowers and Leaves-Stems of three Doronicum taxa from Turkey. Asian J. Chem. 2009;21(2):1225–1229. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alam F., Shafique Z., Amjad S.T., Bin Asad M.H.H. Enzymes inhibitors from natural sources with antidiabetic activity: a review. Phytother. Res. 2019;33:41–54. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alothman E.A., Awaad A.S., Safhi A.A., Almoqren S.S., El-Meligy R.M., Zain Y.M., Alasmary F.A., Alqasoumi S.I. Evaluation of anti-ulcer and ulcerative colitis of Sonchus oleraceus L. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018;26(7):956–959. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altindal, D., 2019. Determination of genetic diversity of natural sage populations in Muğla region of Turkey. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02208-7.
  5. Ascari J., de Oliveira M.S., Nunes D.S., Granato D., Scharf D.R., Simionatto E., Otuki M., Soley B., Heiden G. Chemical composition, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of the essential oils from male and female specimens of Baccharis punctulata (Asteraceae) J. Ethnopharm. 2019;234:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bahadori M.B., Kirkan B., Sarikurkcu C. Phenolic ingredients and therapeutic potential of Stachys cretica subsp. smyrnaea for the management of oxidative stress, Alzheimer’s disease, hyperglycemia, and melisma. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;127:82–87. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bahadori S., Bahadori M.B., Zengin G., Maggi F., Dinparast L., Aktumsek A. Chemical composition profile of the essential oil from Hymenocrater bituminous and its health functionality. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017;20:972–980. [Google Scholar]
  8. Borah A., Paw M., Gogoi R., Loying R., Sarma N., Munda S., Pandey S.K., Lal M. Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and in-vitro cytotoxic efficacy of essential oil of Curcuma caesia Roxb. leaves: An endangered medicinal plant of North East India. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;129:448–454. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brookmeyer R., Johnson E., Ziegler-Graham K., Arrighi H.M. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Candan F., Unlu M., Tepe B., Daferera D., Polissiou M., Sökmen A., Akpulat H.A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Achillea millefolium subsp. millefolium Afan. (Asteraceae) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003;87:215–220. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiasson, J.L., Josse, R.G., Gomis, R., Hanefeld, M., Karasik, A., Laakso, M., STOP-NIDDM Trail Research Group, 2002. Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet. 359(9323), 2072–2077. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2017. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 27th Informational Supplement. CLSI/NCCLS, 27th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA.
  13. Çeliktaş O.Y., Bedir E., Sukan F.V. In vitro antioxidant activities of Rosmarinus officinalis extracts treated with supercritical carbon dioxide. Food Chem. 2007;101:1457–1464. [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis P.H. Edinburgh University Press; Edinburgh: 1965. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R., Tan, K., 1988. Centaurea L. In: Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan K (Eds) Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands, vol. 10. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh. 166–169.
  16. Demirci B., Yusufoglu H.S., Tabanca N., Temel H.E., Bernier U.R., Agramonte N.M., Alqasoumi S.I., Al-Rehaily A.J., Başer K.H.C., Demirci F. Rhanterium epapposum Oliv. essential oil: chemical composition and antimicrobial, insect-repellent and anticholinesterase activities. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017;25(5):703–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Denev P., Čížb M., Kratchanova M., Blazheva D. Black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) polyphenols reveal different antioxidant, antimicrobial and neutrophil-modulating activities. Food Chem. 2019;284:108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Denisow-Pietrzyk M., Pietrzyk L., Denisow B. Asteraceae species as potential environmental factors of allergy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26(7):6290–6300. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04146-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Djihane B., Wafa N., Elkhamssa S., Pedro De H.J., Maria A.E., Mihoub Z.M. Chemical constituents of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don essential oil and their antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, filamentous fungi and Candida albicans. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017;25(5):780–787. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duke J.A. The garden pharmacy: the evidence for lemon balm. Alternat. Complement. Ther. 2007;13:173–177. [Google Scholar]
  21. Echiburu-Chau C., Pastén L., Parra C., Bórquez J., Mocan A., Simirgiotis M.J. High resolution UHPLC-MS characterization and isolation of main compounds from the antioxidant medicinal plant Parastrephia lucida (Meyen) Saudi Pharm J. 2017;25(7):1032–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Edmondson, J.R., in ed.: Davis, P.H., 1975. Doronicum L. (Asteraceae), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. 5, 137–145.
  23. Elansary H.O., Szopa A., Kubica P., Al-Mana F.A., Mahmoud E.A., El-Abedin T.K.A.Z., Mattar M.A., Ekiert H. Phenolic compounds of catalpa speciosa, taxus cuspidata, and magnolia acuminata have antioxidant and anticancer activity. Molecules. 2019;24(3):412. doi: 10.3390/molecules24030412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Figueiredo-González M., Reboredo-Rodríguez P., González-Barreiro C., Carrasco-Pancorbo A., Cancho-Grande B., Simal-Gándara J. The involvement of phenolic-rich extracts from Galician autochthonous extra-virgin olive oils against the α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition. Food Res. Int. 2019;116:447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Güner A., Özhatay N., Ekim T. Edinburgh University Press; Edinburgh: 2000. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. [Google Scholar]
  26. Howes M.J.R., Houghton P.J. Plants used in Chinese and Indian traditional medicine for improvement of memory and cognitive function. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2003;75:513–527. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00128-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu X.J., Wang X.B., Kong L.Y. α-Glucosidase inhibitors via green pathway: biotransformation for bicoumarins catalyzed by Momordica charantia peroxidase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013;61:1501–1508. doi: 10.1021/jf304384b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Javanmardi J., Stushnoff C., Locke E.J., Vivanco M. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Iranian ocimum accessions. Food Chem. 2003;83:547–550. [Google Scholar]
  29. Karadeniz A., Çinbilgel İ., Gün S.Ş., Çetin A. Antioxidant activity of some Turkish medicinal plants. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015;29(24):2308–2312. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1005618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaya A.A., Üçüncü O., İlter Ş.M., Baltacı C., Öztürk S. Chemical composition and bioactive properties of the essential oil of Rhinanthus angustifolius subsp. grandiflorus. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2017;49:923–927. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kirby A.J., Schmidt R.J. The antioxidant activity of Chinese herbs for eczema and of placebo herbs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997;56:103–108. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(97)01510-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kladar N.V., Anačkov G.T., Rat M.M., Srđenović B.U., Grujić N.N., Šefer E.I., Božin B.N. Biochemical Characterization of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G.Don subsp. italicum (Asteraceae) from Montenegro: Phytochemical Screening, Chemotaxonomy, and Antioxidant Properties. Chem. Biodivers. 2015;12:419–431. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201400174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumar V.P., Chauhan N.S., Padh H., Rajan M. Search for antibacterial and antifungal agents from selected Indian medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107:182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lasano N.F., Hamid A.H., Karim R., Dek M.S.P., Shukri R., Ramli N.S. Nutritional composition, anti-diabetic properties and identification of active compounds using UHPLC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS/MS in Mangifera odorata L. Peel Seed Kernel. Mol. 2019;24:320. doi: 10.3390/molecules24020320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moghtader M., Afzali D. Study of the antimicrobial proprieties of the oil of Rosemary. Am-Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2009;5:393–397. [Google Scholar]
  36. Moreno M.I., Isla M.I., Sampietro A.R., Vattuone M.A. Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000;71:109–114. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00189-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Okoh O.O., Sadimenko A.P., Afolayan A.J. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial activities of the essential oils of Rosmarinus officinalis obtained by hydrodistillation and solvent free microwave extraction methods. Food Chem. 2010;120(1):308–312. [Google Scholar]
  38. Özcan K., Acet T. In vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the five different solvent extracts of Centaurea pulcherrima var. freynii from Turkey. Fresen Environ Bull. 2018;27(6):4047–4051. [Google Scholar]
  39. Palanisamy U.D., Ling L.T., Manaharan T., Appleton D. Rapid isolation of geraniin from Nephelium lappaceum rind waste and its anti-hyperglycemic activity. Food Chem. 2011;127:21–27. [Google Scholar]
  40. Politi F.A.S., Queiroz-Fernandes G.M., Rodrigues E.R., Freitas J.A., Pietro R. Antifungal, antiradical and cytotoxic activities of extractives obtained from Tagetes patula L. (asteraceae), a potential acaricide plant species. Microb. Pathog. 2016;95:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Qiu W.Q., Folstein M.F. Insulin, insulin-degrading enzyme and amyloid-β peptide in Alzheimer's disease: review and hypothesis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2006;27(2):190–198. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Re R., Pellegrini N., Proteggente A., Pannala A., Yang M., Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00315-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roig, J.T., 1965. Diccionario de Nombres Vulgares Cubanos. Tercera edición. Editorial Científico Técnica, La Habana.
  44. Saleem H., Ahmad I., Zengin G., Mahomoodally F.M., Khan K.R., Ahsan H.F., Abidin S.A.Z., Ahemad N. Comparative secondary metabolites profiling and biological activities of aerial, stem and root parts of Salvadora oleoides decne (Salvadoraceae) Nat. Prod. Res. 2019 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1564299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Saleem H., Htar T.T., Naidu R., Nawawi N.S., Ahmad I., Ashraf M., Ahemad N. Biological, chemical and toxicological perspectives on aerial and roots of Filago germanica (L.) huds: Functional approaches for novel phyto-pharmaceuticals. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019;123:363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Salehi B., Valussi M., Morais-Braga M.F.B., Carneiro J.N.P., Leal A.L.A.B., Coutinho H.D.M., Vitalini S., Kręgiel D., Antolak H., Sharifi-Rad M., Silva N.C.C., Yousaf Z., Martorell M., Iriti M., Carradori S., Sharifi-Rad J. Tagetes spp. Essential Oils and other extracts: chemical characterization and biological activity. Molecules. 2018;23(11):e2847. doi: 10.3390/molecules23112847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saoud D.H., Jelassi A., Hlila M.B., Goudjil M.B., Ladjel S., Ben Jannet H. Biological activities of extracts and metabolites isolated from Anvillea radiata Coss. & Dur. (Asteraceae) S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019;121:386–393. [Google Scholar]
  48. Saravanan S., Pari L. Protective effect of thymol on high fat diet induceddiabetic nephropathy in C57BL/6J mice. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2016;245:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Seo E., Kang H., Choi H., Choi W., Jun H.-S. Reactive oxygen species-induced changes in glucose and lipid metabolism contribute to the accumulation of cholesterol in the liver during aging. Aging Cell. 2019;18:e12895. doi: 10.1111/acel.12895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shirazi M.T., Gholami H., Kavoosi G., Rowshan V., Tafsiry A. Chemical composition, antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of Tagetes minuta and Ocimum basilicum essential oils. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014;2:146–155. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shrivastava S.K., Sinha S.K., Srivastava P., Tripathi P.N., Sharma P., Tripathi M.K., Tripathi A., Choubey P.K., Waiker D.K., Aggarwal L.M., Dixit M., Kheruka S.C., Gambhir S., Shankar S., Srivastava R.K. Design and development of novel p-aminobenzoic acid derivatives as potential cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg. Chem. 2019;82:211–223. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Slinkard K., Singleton V.L. Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977;28:49–55. [Google Scholar]
  53. Usta C., Yildirim A.B., Turker A.U. Antibacterial and antitumour activities of some plants grown in Turkey. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2014;28(2):306–315. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.909708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Uysal S., Senkardes I., Mollica A., Zengin G., Bulut G., Dogan A., Glamočlija J., Soković M., Lobine D., Mahomoodally F.M. Biologically active compounds from two members of the Asteraceae family: Tragopogon dubius Scop. and Tussilago farfara L. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2018;24:1–13. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2018.1506361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. World Health Organization (WHO), 2016. Improving access to insulin and oral medicines for diabetes, Moldova. Global Reports on Diabetes. 59, WHO Press, Geneva.
  56. Wu X., Cai H., Pan L., Cui G., Qin F., Li Y.C., Cai Z. Small Molecule Natural Products and Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019;19:1. doi: 10.2174/1568026619666190201153257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang X.W., Huang M.Z., Jin Y.S., Sun L.N., Song Y., Chen H.S. Phenolics from Bidens bipinnata and their amylase inhibitory properties. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:1169–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zengin G., Sarikurkcu C., Aktumsek A., Ceylan R., Ceylan O. A comprehensive study on phytochemical characterization of Haplophyllum myrtifolium Boiss. endemic to Turkey and its inhibitory potential against key enzymes involved in Alzheimer skin diseases and type II diabetes. Ind. Crop Prod. 2014;53:244–251. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zengin G., Zheleva-Dimitrova D., Gevrenova R., Nedialkov P., Mocan A., Ćirić A., Glamočlija J., Soković M., Aktumsek A., Mahomoodally M.F. Identification of phenolic components via LC–MS analysis and biological activities of two Centaurea species: C. drabifolia subsp. drabifolia and C. lycopifolia. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018;149:436–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhao C., Tang Z., Chung A.C.K., Wang H., Cai Z. Metabolic perturbation, proliferation and reactive oxygen species jointly contribute to cytotoxicity of human breast cancer cell induced by tetrabromo and tetrachloro bisphenol A. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2019;170:495–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhu, C., 2013. Aldose reductase inhibitors as potential therapeutic drugs of diabetic complications. In: Diabetes mellitus‐insights and perspectives. InTech

Articles from Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES