Abstract
Background
Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an underappreciated cause of morbidity and mortality. Light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis have different disease trajectories. No data are available on subtype-specific modes of death (MOD) in patients with CA.
Methods and results
We retrospectively investigated 66 with AL and 48 with wild-type ATTR amyloidosis (ATTRwt) from 2000 to 2018. ATTRwt differed from AL by age (74.6 ± 5.4 years vs. 63 ± 10.8 years), posterior wall thickness (16.8 ± 3.3 mm vs. 14.3 ± 2.2 mm), left ventricular mass index (180.7 ± 63.2 g/m2 vs. 133.5 ± 42.2 g/m2), and the proportions of male gender (91.7% vs. 59.1%), atrial enlargement (92% vs. 68.2%) and atrial fibrillation (50% vs. 12.1%). In AL NYHA Functional Class and proteinuria (72.7% vs. 39.6%) were greater; mean arterial pressure (84.4 ± 13.5 mmHg vs. 90.0 ± 11.3 mmHg) was lower. Unadjusted 5-year mortality rate was 65% in AL-CA vs. 44% in the ATTRwt group. Individuals with AL-CA were 2.28 times ([95%CI 1.27–4.10]; p = 0.006) more likely to die than were individuals with ATTRwt-CA. Information on MOD was available in 56 (94.9%) of 59 deceased patients. MOD was cardiovascular in 40 (66.8%) and non-cardiovascular in 16 (27.1%) patients. Cardiovascular [28 (68.3%) vs. 13 (80%)] death events were distributed equally between AL and ATTRwt (p = 0.51).
Conclusion
Our data indicate no differences in MOD between patients with AL and ATTRwt cardiac amyloidosis despite significant differences in clinical presentation and disease progression. Cardiovascular events account for more than two-thirds of fatal casualties in both groups.
Graphic abstract
Keywords: Cardiac amyloidosis, Light chain (AL) amyloidosis, Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis, Prognosis, Mode of death
Introduction
Cardiac amyloidosis is an infiltrative process of the extracellular matrix that increases myocardial wall thickness in the absence of actual cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [1]. Acquired monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (AL), the hereditary, transthyretin (TTR)-related form (ATTRm), and wild-type (non-mutant) TTR-related amyloidosis (ATTRwt) systemic “senile” amyloidosis account for more than 90% of all cardiac amyloidosis (CA) [2].
While AL is considered a rare disease [3] and ATTRm is mostly seen in endemic regions [4] and in elderly patients of African descent [5], recent evidence suggests that ATTRwt is probably much more common than widely appreciated. ATTR was evident in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [6] and in elderly patients with aortic stenosis [10]. In Finland, ATTR was found in 25% of autopsies in very old persons [11], giving rise to the suspicion that ATTRwt could be the most frequent form of CA [9].
AL typically affects multiple organ systems. Cardiac involvement is found in up to 70% of cases. While frequency of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in ATTRm is variable and depends on the specific mutation [12], ATTRwt almost exclusively affects the heart. CA is typically associated with heart failure and dictates the clinical course of the disease. Most importantly, disease profiles and clinical courses differ between AL and ATTR [2, 13]. Prognosis is poor in patients with CA with better survival in ATTR than in AL [2, 8, 13, 14]. Also, the two subtypes of CA differ significantly with respect to treatment options [8, 15].
A major limitation observed in the previously published literature is the fact that despite the commonly held notion that death in CA occurs either as a result of progressive heart failure or sudden cardiac death [16], mode of death in patients with cardiac AL and TTR amyloidosis has hardly been studied so far [17].
It was the aim of this comprehensive retrospective study to provide data on disease progression and mode of death in patients with cardiac AL and TTR amyloidosis to improve clinical management and service provision in these patients.
Methods
The study cohort consisted of consecutive patients with confirmed AL or ATTRwt amyloidosis seen between May 2000 and June 2018 at a tertiary (Cardiology Department, Medical University of Innsbruck) and a secondary (Cardiology Department, Ordensklinikum Elisabethinen Linz) centre. A comprehensive baseline assessment was performed in all patients including initial clinical evaluation and follow-up as well as laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the trial. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck.
Diagnostic definition
Diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis was defined by histological documentation of Congo Red staining and apple-green birefringence under cross-polarized light in at least one involved organ. Cardiac amyloidosis was diagnosed either by means of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), cardiac imaging [echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or 99mTC-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxyl acid (99mTC-DPD) scintigraphy] and/or elevation of biomarkers (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, troponin T) in patients with a positive result of non-cardiac biopsy [2, 18–20].
Diagnosis of ATTRm was defined by a documented TTR mutation at DNA analysis, ATTRwt by positive immunohistochemistry for TTR in the absence of any TTR mutation and AL by the presence of monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. The Mayo staging system was used for risk stratification in AL and TTR amyloidosis using different cut-off values for troponin T and NT-proBNP for each subtype [21, 22].
Data collection and definitions
Follow-up was closed in June 2018. For patients who had not attended a follow-up in the last 3 months, vital status was ascertained by telephone contact and/or by contacting referring physicians. Information on death was retrieved from patients’ charts, family doctors and relatives, and official documents of death. All deaths were adjudicated by two senior cardiologists (C. E. and G. P.). We employed a classification system derived from the “ACME system” for death in heart failure [23]. Mode of death (MOD) was first categorized as cardiovascular (CV) or non-cardiovascular (non-CV). CV deaths were subsequently classified as cardiac (sudden cardiac death [SCD] or circulatory failure) or vascular (stroke and “other” CV deaths including peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary embolism, mesenteric infarction, and procedural complications). SCD and circulatory failure comprising cardiogenic shock, pulmonary oedema and acute heart failure were defined according to established criteria [24].
Statistical analysis
Continuous data were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical variables are presented as percentage (%), continuous variables as mean [standard deviation (SD)] or median (25th, 75th percentile). Between-group comparisons were performed with the T test, Mann–Whitney U test or Pearson’s Chi-squared test, as appropriate.
Survival analysis was performed for the AL and the ATTRwt amyloid subtypes with all-cause mortality as the endpoint. Patients were censored on June 30, 2018. The unadjusted association between amyloid subtypes and mortality was assessed using a univariable Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios, 95% CIs and p values were calculated. A multivariable Cox model adjusted for age and sex was developed by selecting variables that were clinically relevant. Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular modes of death were compared between groups with Fisher’s exact test.
A two-sided p value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All calculations were performed using the SPSS statistical package, version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
A total of 124 patients with amyloidosis were screened for inclusion (Fig. 1). Three patients were excluded because of a transthyretin mutation; in seven patients, cardiac involvement could not be demonstrated. The final study cohort consisted of 114 patients: 66 with AL and 48 with ATTRwt amyloidosis. Diagnosis in ATTRwt was based on EMB in 94% and 99mTC-DPD scintigraphy in 6% of patients, and in AL patients on EMB in 62.1% and on non-cardiac biopsy in 37.9%. In those in whom the diagnosis was reached by non-cardiac biopsy, definition of cardiac involvement was based on echocardiography and/or CMR plus elevations of biomarkers.
Fig. 1.
Assembly of the cohort, participant flow, and mode of death in deceased patients. CA cardiac amyloidosis, HTx heart transplantation, LVAD left ventricular assist device, MOD mode of death
AL amyloidosis was associated with multiple myeloma in 41 (62%) and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia in 25 (38%) patients.
Baseline characteristics of AL vs. ATTRwt for the total population are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient baseline and treatment characteristics
| All Patients (n = 114) |
AL (n = 66) |
ATTRwt (n = 48) |
p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||
| Sex (male) | 83 (72.8) | 39 (59.1) | 44 (91.7) | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 67.8 ± 10.6 | 63.0 ± 10.8 | 74.6 ± 5.4 | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.1 ± 3.9 | 24.5 ± 4.1 | 25.9 ± 3.5 | 0.054 |
| Diagnosis of CA | ||||
| Echocardiography | 114 (100) | 66 (100) | 48 (100) | 1.000 |
| Cardiac MRI | 81 (71.1) | 44 (66.7) | 39 (76.4) | 0.509 |
| DPD-Tc scintigraphy | 14 (12.3) | 5 (7.6) | 9 (18.8) | 0.088 |
| Endomyocardial biopsy | 86 (75.4) | 41 (62.1) | 45 (93.75) | < 0.001 |
| Extracardiac biopsies | 25 (21.9) | 25 (37.9) | 0 (0) | < 0.001 |
| Cardiac characteristics | ||||
| NYHA functional class | 0.047 | |||
| I | 11 (9.7) | 6 (9.1) | 5 (10.4) | |
| II | 51 (44.7) | 24 (36.4) | 27 (56.3) | |
| III/IV | 52 (45.6) | 36 (54.5) | 16 (33.3) | |
| Mayo staging scorea | 0.547 | |||
| I | 3 (3.3) | 2 (3.5) | 1 (2.9) | |
| II | 23 (25.0) | 12 (21.1) | 11 (31.4) | |
| III | 66 (71.7) | 43 (75.4) | 23 (65.7) | |
| MAP (mmHg) | 86.7 ± 12.9 | 84.4 ± 13.5 | 90.0 ± 11.3 | 0.018 |
| CAD* | 20 (17.7) | 10 (15.2) | 10 (20.8) | 0.458 |
| Valvular heart diseaseb | 11 (9.6) | 8 (12.1) | 3 (6.3) | 0.352 |
| NTpro-BNP (ng/L) | 4578 ± 4378 | 5141 ± 5300 | 3873 ± 2730 | 0.543 |
| Cardiac troponin T (ng/L)c | 77.6 ± 70.4 | 86.8 ± 84.4 | 62.3 ± 32.3 | 0.673 |
| Echocardiography | ||||
| Atrial enlargement | 88 (77.2) | 45 (68.2) | 43 (89.6) | 0.005 |
| LV-EF (%) | 51.5 ± 11.4 | 53.6 ± 11.4 | 48.7 ± 11.1 | 0.020 |
| PWD, mm | 15.4 ± 3.0 | 14.3 ± 2.2 | 16.8 ± 3.3 | < 0.001 |
| LV mass (g) | 281.3 ± 108.9 | 247.0 ± 90.6 | 331.0 ± 114.8 | < 0.001 |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 152.4 ± 56.3 | 133.5 ± 42.2 | 180.7 ± 63.2 | < 0.001 |
| E/A ratio | 1.81 ± 1.22 | 1.68 ± 1.04 | 2.15 ± 1.64 | 0.457 |
| Pericardial effusion | 38 (33.3) | 24 (36.4) | 14 (29.2) | 0.220 |
| ECG | ||||
| Atrial fibrillation | 32 (28.1) | 8 (12.1) | 24 (50.0) | < 0.001 |
| First-degree AV-block | 24 (21.1) | 7 (10.6) | 17 (35.4) | 0.002 |
| Third-degree AV-block | 3 (2.6) | 2 (3.0) | 1 (2.1) | 1.0 |
| Low voltage signs | 23 (20.2) | 18 (27.3) | 5 (10.4) | 0.032 |
| Pseudoinfarct pattern | 29 (25.4) | 15 (22.7) | 14 (29.2) | 0.520 |
| Renal characteristics | ||||
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.26 ± 0.71 | 1.24 ± 0.90 | 1.28 ± 0.29 | 0.008 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 62.4 ± 22.4 | 66.8 ± 25.6 | 56.3 ± 15.4 | 0.007 |
| Proteinuria | 67 (58.8) | 48 (72.7) | 19 (39.6) | 0.001 |
| Specific therapy | ||||
| Immunotherapy | 53 (80.3) | n/a | ||
| Chemotherapy | 56 (84.0) | n/a | ||
| ASCT | 14 (21.2) | n/a | ||
| Green tea capsules/EGCG | 23 (20.2) | 6 (9.1) | 17 (35.4) | < 0.001 |
| Tafamidis | 3 (5.9) | n/a | ||
| Anticoagulant therapy | 75 (65.8) | 40 (60.6) | 35 (72.9) | 0.158 |
| ICD | 11 (9.6) | 4 (6.1) | 7 (14.6) | 0.198 |
| Pacemaker | 18 (15.8) | 8 (12.1) | 10 (20.8) | 0.298 |
| HTx/LVAD | 5 (4.4) | 3 (4.5) | 2 (4.2) | 0.637 |
Data from 114 patients are reported as mean (± standard deviation) or number (percentage)
BMI body mass index, NYHA New York heart association, MAP mean atrial pressure pressure, CAD coronary artery disease, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, LV-EF left ventricular ejection fraction, Syst. PWD posterior wall thickness, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation, EGCG epigallocatechin gallate, ICD implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, HTx heart transplantation, LVAD left ventricular assist device
a≥ 70% stenosis a/o need for coronary intervention
bIncluding severe aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation/stenosis, and tricuspid regurgitation
cTroponin T and Mayo staging score were available in 92 patients-different Mayo staging scores were applied for each subtype according to Dispenzieri et al. [21] and Grogan et al. [22]
Mortality and mode of death
Overall, 325.7 patient years of follow-up were registered. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 21.1 months (5.6–54.4). The group of patients with an AL subtype had a median follow-up of 16 months (4.6–60.9), while the ATTRwt cohort had a median follow-up of 24.6 months (6.8–50.6) (p = 0.81).
After censoring follow-up, 59 (51.8%) of all patients met the endpoint of all-cause mortality. Of the patients with AL amyloidosis 44 died, corresponding to an unadjusted 5-year mortality rate of 65%, while in the ATTRwt group there were 15 deaths, corresponding to a 5-year mortality rate (25.0% 30-month mortality rate). Four patients received a heart transplant, three in the AL and one in the ATTRwt group, and one patient with TTR amyloidosis a LV assist device over the course of the study period.
Baseline characteristics of non-survivors vs. survivors are shown in Table 2. Deceased patients presented with higher NT-proBNP levels (p = 0.003) and higher NYHA functional class (p = 0.039). Interestingly, the proportion of patients in atrial fibrillation was significantly larger in survivors (p = 0.023). The Mayo score was not different between groups (p = 0.287). This was also true when AL and ATTRwt patients were analysed separately (p = 0.154 and p = 0.764, respectively).
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics in survivors vs. non-survivors
| Survivors (n = 55) |
Non-survivors (n = 59) |
p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic characteristics | |||
| Sex (male) | 42 (76.4) | 41 (69.5) | 0.528 |
| Age (years) | 68.2 ± 11.3 | 67.5 ± 10.0 | 0.378 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.3 ± 3.9 | 24.9 ± 3.8 | 0.605 |
| Cardiac characteristics | |||
| NYHA functional class | 0.039 | ||
| I | 8 (14.6) | 3 (5.1) | |
| II | 28 (50.9) | 23 (39.0) | |
| III/IV | 19 (34.5) | 33 (55.9) | |
| Mayo staging scorea | 0.287 | ||
| I | 3 (6.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| II | 12 (25.5) | 11 (24.4) | |
| III | 32 (68.1) | 34 (75.6) | |
| MAP (mmHg) | 88.4 ± 10.5 | 85.2 ± 14.6 | 0.192 |
| CAD* | 12 (21.8) | 7 (11.9) | 0.324 |
| Valvular heart diseaseb | 4 (7.3) | 8 (13.6) | 0.364 |
| NTpro-BNP (ng/L) | 3569 ± 3232 | 5623 ± 5137 | 0.003 |
| Cardiac troponin T (ng/L)c | 72.5 ± 61.5 | 82.6 ± 78.8 | 0.665 |
| Echocardiography | |||
| Atrial enlargement | 39 (70.1) | 49 (83.1) | 0.181 |
| LV-EF | 52.9 ± 11.1 | 50.2 ± 11.6 | 0.235 |
| PWD (mm) | 15.7 ± 3.5 | 15.1 ± 2.5 | 0.307 |
| LV Mass (g) | 301.0 ± 127.0 | 266.0 ± 90.0 | 0.121 |
| LV mass Index (g/m2) | 163.5 ± 67.5 | 143.9 ± 44.7 | 0.179 |
| E/A ratio | 1.40 ± 0.89 | 2.05 ± 1.34 | 0.093 |
| Pericardial effusion | 18 (32.7) | 20 (33.9) | 0.686 |
| ECG | |||
| Atrial fibrillation | 21 (38.2) | 11 (18.6) | 0.023 |
| AV-block | 15 (27.3) | 12 (20.3) | 0.508 |
| First-degree AV-block | 14 (25.4) | 10 (16.9) | 0.358 |
| Third-degree AV-block | 1 (1.8) | 2 (3.4) | 1.0 |
| Pseudoinfarct patterns | 15 (27.3) | 14 (23.7) | 0.673 |
| Renal characteristics | |||
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.27 ± 0.90 | 1.25 ± 0.48 | 0.725 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 63.8 ± 23.7 | 61.1 ± 21.3 | 0.531 |
| Proteinuria | 28 (50.1%) | 39 (66.1%) | 0.241 |
| Specific therapy | |||
| Green tea capsules/EGCG | 10 (18.2) | 13 (22.0) | 0.645 |
| Anticoagulant therapy | 35 (63.6) | 40 (67.8) | 0.842 |
| ICD | 6 (10.9) | 5 (8.5) | 0.756 |
| Pacemaker | 5 (9.1) | 13 (22.0) | 0.074 |
| HTx/LVAD | 3 (5.5) | 2 (3.4) | 0.673 |
Data from 114 patients are reported as mean (± standard deviation) or number (percentage)
BMI body mass index, NYHA New York heart association, MAP mean atrial pressure pressure, CAD coronary artery disease, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, LV-EF left ventricular ejection fraction, Syst.; PWD posterior wall thickness, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, EGCG epigallocatechin gallate, ICD implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, HTx heart transplantation, LVAD left ventricular assist device
a≥ 70% stenosis a/o need for coronary intervention
bIncluding severe aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation/stenosis, and tricuspid regurgitation
cTroponin T and Mayo staging score were available in 92 patients
Cox regression analysis showed individuals with AL amyloidosis to be 2.28 times ([95%CI 1.27–4.10]; p = 0.006) more likely to die than were individuals with ATTRwt amyloidosis (Fig. 2). Likewise, the combined endpoint of death, heart transplantation or LV assist device implantation was significantly higher in AL patients (HR 2.01 [95%CI 1.22–3.83]; p = 0.008). Multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex and age demonstrated that AL amyloid-specific subtype and lnNT-proBNP were associated with mortality independent of LV-EF, MAP, NYHA functional class, atrial fibrillation, and eGFR (Table 3). Results remained robust when in a subgroup of patients (n = 92) the Mayo staging score was added to the model.
Fig. 2.
Correlation between cardiac AL and TTR amyloidosis and mortality Cumulative 5-year event rates estimated by univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis in 117 patients with cardiac amyloidosis according to subtype are presented. Numbers of patients at risk and event rates are shown below the graphs
Table 3.
Association between amyloidosis subtypes and survival during the observation period using multivariate, sex- and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses
| Multivariate model adjusted for age and sex | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wald | HR | 95% CI | p value | |
| AL vs. ATTRwt | 7.02 | 3.03 | 1.33–6.87 | 0.008 |
| LV-EF, per % | 1.47 | 0.98 | 0.96–1.01 | 0.225 |
| MAP, per mmHg | 0.75 | 0.99 | 0.97–1.01 | 0.387 |
| NYHA class, overall | 0.64 | 0.728 | ||
| A-Fib, y/n | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.30–1.67 | 0.441 |
| lnNT-proBNP, per ln ng/L | 11.95 | 2.16 | 1.39–3.33 | 0.001 |
| eGFR, per ml/min/1.73 m2 | 2.467 | 1.02 | 0.99–1.02 | 0.116 |
LV-EF left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA New York Heart Association, MAP mean atrial pressure, A-Fib atrial fibrillation, lnNT-proBNP logarithmically transformed N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate
Information on MOD was available for 56 (94.9%) of the deceased patients. Of the deceased patients 37 (62.7%) died in hospital, death was witnessed in another 9 (15.3%) patients. Autopsy was performed in 13 (22.0%) patients. Overall, MOD in (Fig. 3) was found to be CV in 40 (67.8%) and non-CV in 16 (27.1%) patients [sepsis in 4 (6.8%), pneumonia in 3 (5.1%), uraemia in 2 (3.4%), GI bleeding in 2 (3.4%), anaemia in 1 (1.7%), accident in 1 (1.7%), and cachexia in 3 (5.1%) patients, respectively], but remained unknown in 3 (5.1%) patients (AL) in the entire cohort. In deceased patients time to death was numerically, but not statistically, significantly shorter for CV [23.3 months (4.6–34.6)] compared with non-CV death events [26.8 months 4.7–34.0)] (p = 0.67). Almost all CV deaths were cardiac (97.5%) and one was vascular due to cerebral hemorrhage).
Fig. 3.
a, b Mode of death stratified by amyloid subtype. All deaths are divided into cardiovascular (CV), non-CV, and unknown deaths; cardiovascular deaths are further subdivided into sudden cardiac death (SCD), cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure, cerebral haemorrhage, and multi-organ failure (MOF), while non-CV deaths are subdivided into sepsis/pneumonia, uraemia, GI bleeding, anaemia, accident, and cachexia
Among patients with documented MOD, CV [28 (68.3%) vs. 12 (80.0%)] and non-CV [13 (31.7%) vs. 3 (20.0%)] death events were distributed equally between AL and TTR subtypes (p = 0.513) (Fig. 3). Even when multi-organ failure (MOF) was considered non-CV, CV deaths still accounted for 61% in AL and 77.3% in TTR patients (p = 0.49). Also, there were no major differences between AL and TTR patients in terms of sudden cardiac death [4 (9.1%) vs. 0 (0.0%)], cardiogenic shock [2 (4.5%) vs. 0 (0.0%)], acute heart failure [19 (43.2%) vs. 10 (66.7%)], MOF [3 (6.8%) vs. 1 (6.7%)], sepsis/pneumonia [5 (11.4%) vs. 2 (13.3%)], uraemia [2 (4.5%) vs. 0 (0.0%)], GI bleeding [1 (2.3%) vs. 1 (6.7%)], anaemia [1 (2.3%) vs. 0 (0.0%)], accident [1 (2.3%) vs. 0 (0.0%)], and cachexia [3 (6.8%) vs. 0 (0.0%)] (Fig. 3).
Discussion
This study describes a well-characterized cohort of patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Our study shows that although clinical presentation and disease progression differed between AL and ATTRwt, CV death was the predominant mode of death in both subtypes.
Mortality was high in the entire cohort of patients. Prognosis was significantly worse in AL than in ATTRwt. This is well in line with previous studies in patients with CA [2, 8, 13, 14]. Five-year mortality rate in our cohort was 65% in AL and 44% in TTR. The 25% 30-month mortality rate in the ATTR group corresponds largely to the number reported in the recently published ATTR-ACT study [25]. Although non-survivors presented at baseline with more severe heart failure symptoms effects of the amyloid subtype on mortality were independent of substantial confounders including NT-proBNP levels. Mayo staging scores were not different between survivors and non-survivors.
Information on MOD was available in 95% of patients. Similar to previous reports concerning heart failure [6, 24] 2.7% of our patients died in hospital. Necropsy was performed in a minority (22%) of patients. Interestingly, cardiovascular events accounted for more than two-thirds of fatal casualties in both groups. Circulatory failure comprising cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure and multi-organ failure was the predominant MOD. Thus, our data on MOD for the first time provide evidence for the predominance of CV deaths in patients with CA irrespective of the amyloid subtype, which was previously discussed in the literature [16]. MOD in our cohort of patients with cardiac amyloidosis agrees well with 60–70% CV deaths and 20–30% non-CV deaths, which were recently reported in patients with HFpEF of various aetiologies [26].
Since information on circumstances of death was retrieved retrospectively, exact definition of cause of death (COD) was difficult to determine in a substantial number of the deceased. Therefore, we refrain from reporting separately on COD. In contrast, MOD was able to be defined in most patients. Due to the systemic nature of the disease in AL with concomitant involvement of several organ systems, adjudication of MOD was complex in patients with MOF. Nevertheless, if patients with MOF were classified non-CV instead of CV, the proportion of circulatory failure events remained large. Acute heart failure was the main cause of CV deaths in AL and ATTRwt (68.3% and 80%, respectively). Similarity between groups in this regard is remarkable since first presentation of CA was different in both subtypes. The majority of ATTRwt patients presented with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) characterized by greater LV mass and a larger percentage of atrial enlargement and atrial fibrillation compared to AL. In contrast, AL patients were younger with a female predominance, higher NYHA functional class and lower blood pressure, and a larger percentage of proteinuria. Discrepancies between groups in our cohort of CA patients are corroborated by comparable data from the existing literature [2, 7, 13, 14, 27, 28]. It is speculated that differences in extracellular amyloid deposition and a likely toxic effect on cardiomyocytes and their architecture, as demonstrated in AL amyloidosis [29], account for differences in phenotypic appearance and—together with non-cardiological factors—also for differences in mortality [2, 9].
In fact, our data show that heart failure is the predominant MOD in both subtypes despite significant differences in patient presentation and disease progression.
Interestingly, SCD was registered only in a minority of patients in both groups. It must be acknowledged that 25% of our patients were treated with an ICD and/or pacemaker. However, no appropriate ICD discharge was documented in these patients. Indeed, previous studies could not show a survival benefit despite appropriate ICD shocks in patients with CA [30, 31]. This was mostly attributed to electromechanical dissociation, as the underlying mechanism for SCD in CA.
The most common non-CV MOD in both subtypes was sepsis and pneumonia in 11.4% of AL and 13.3% of ATTRwt patients. The relatively small number in AL with the majority of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or autologous stem cell transplantation is contrary to common expectation. This phenomenon may indicate excellent oncologic patient management and emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary management of CA patients.
Of note, only one vascular death was registered in the entire cohort. This is remarkable as cardioembolic events and venous thromboembolism are frequent in amyloidosis [32]. In an early necropsy series, 26% of patients with CA had one or more cardiac chamber thrombi [33]. In our cohort, 28.2% of patients were in atrial fibrillation and thus particularly prone to cardioembolic events. It can be speculated that low incidence of deadly vascular events was due to a large percentage of patients on anticoagulant therapy in both subtypes. Intensive anticoagulant therapy, however, may have been penalized by three cases of deadly bleedings.
Importantly, disease prognosis has been altered with the development of new strategies that efficiently supress secretion of amyloid-forming light chains in AL and also with earlier diagnosis that may prevent irreversible damage to the heart [8, 15]. Up to now, treatment in ATTRwt was limited mostly to supportive care. The recent emergence of novel therapeutics such as tafamidis [25], which act to prevent transthyretin amyloid formation, and other agents that inhibit transthyretin expression [34, 35] offers promise for the near future in the management of ATTRwt, which probably constitutes the majority of CA patients. This underscores even more the cardiologists’ responsibilities with regard to early and exact diagnosis as well as comprehensive disease management strategies.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths of our study include the comprehensive clinical characterization and complete follow-up of our sample. However, some limitations apply to this study. Information on COD, which could not be retrieved in a substantial number of patients, would have improved the value of the study. MOD in ten patients whose dead was not witnessed and who had no autopsy was classified based on death records a/o information received from relatives concerning the last hours of the deceased individuals. No information was available on non-deadly strokes, heart failure admissions, and pacemaker dependency, which would have improved assessment of disease progression.
Conclusions
This analysis shows no differences in MOD between patients with AL and TTRwt cardiac amyloidosis despite significant differences in clinical presentation and disease progression. Cardiovascular events account for two-thirds of fatal causalities in both groups. Our findings underline the great responsibility of cardiologists in the management of CA and call for early diagnosis, meticulous fluid control to avoid congestion, and prevention or even reversal of disease progression by providing vigorous treatment of the underlying pathomechanism by an interdisciplinary team.
Acknowledgements
Open access funding provided by University of Innsbruck and Medical University of Innsbruck. We thank Eva-Maria Stocker for her excellent support with endomyocardial biopsies.
Funding
None.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Poelzl G has received speaker honoraria from Pfizer and AKCEA Therapeutics.
Footnotes
F. Escher and G. Poelzl contributed equally to this manuscript.
References
- 1.Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, Bilinska Z, Cecchi F, Charron P, Dubourg O, Kuhl U, Maisch B, McKenna WJ, Monserrat L, Pankuweit S, Rapezzi C, Seferovic P, Tavazzi L, Keren A. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:270–276. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rapezzi C, Merlini G, Quarta CC, Riva L, Longhi S, Leone O, Salvi F, Ciliberti P, Pastorelli F, Biagini E, Coccolo F, Cooke RM, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Sangiorgi D, Ferlini A, Cavo M, Zamagni E, Fonte ML, Palladini G, Salinaro F, Musca F, Obici L, Branzi A, Perlini S. Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types. Circulation. 2009;120:1203–1212. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pinney JH, Smith CJ, Taube JB, Lachmann HJ, Venner CP, Gibbs SD, Dungu J, Banypersad SM, Wechalekar AD, Whelan CJ, Hawkins PN, Gillmore JD. Systemic amyloidosis in England: an epidemiological study. Br J Haematol. 2013;161:525–532. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dardiotis E, Koutsou P, Papanicolaou EZ, Vonta I, Kladi A, Vassilopoulos D, Hadjigeorgiou G, Christodoulou K, Kyriakides T. Epidemiological, clinical and genetic study of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy in Cyprus. Amyloid. 2009;16:32–37. doi: 10.1080/13506120802676948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Damy T, Costes B, Hagege AA, Donal E, Eicher JC, Slama M, Guellich A, Rappeneau S, Gueffet JP, Logeart D, Plante-Bordeneuve V, Bouvaist H, Huttin O, Mulak G, Dubois-Rande JL, Goossens M, Canoui-Poitrine F, Buxbaum JN. Prevalence and clinical phenotype of hereditary transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in patients with increased left ventricular wall thickness. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1826–1834. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mohammed SF, Mirzoyev SA, Edwards WD, Dogan A, Grogan DR, Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Zeldenrust SR, Redfield MM. Left ventricular amyloid deposition in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gonzalez-Lopez E, Gallego-Delgado M, Guzzo-Merello G, de Haro-Del Moral FJ, Cobo-Marcos M, Robles C, Bornstein B, Salas C, Lara-Pezzi E, Alonso-Pulpon L, Garcia-Pavia P. Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2585–2594. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gertz MA, Benson MD, Dyck PJ, Grogan M, Coelho T, Cruz M, Berk JL, Plante-Bordeneuve V, Schmidt HHJ, Merlini G. Diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of transthyretin amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2451–2466. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Connors LH, Sam F, Skinner M, Salinaro F, Sun F, Ruberg FL, Berk JL, Seldin DC. Heart failure resulting from age-related cardiac amyloid disease associated with wild-type transthyretin: a prospective, observational cohort study. Circulation. 2016;133:282–290. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galat A, Guellich A, Bodez D, Slama M, Dijos M, Zeitoun DM, Milleron O, Attias D, Dubois-Rande JL, Mohty D, Audureau E, Teiger E, Rosso J, Monin JL, Damy T. Aortic stenosis and transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: the chicken or the egg? Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3525–3531. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tanskanen M, Peuralinna T, Polvikoski T, Notkola IL, Sulkava R, Hardy J, Singleton A, Kiuru-Enari S, Paetau A, Tienari PJ, Myllykangas L. Senile systemic amyloidosis affects 25% of the very aged and associates with genetic variation in alpha2-macroglobulin and tau: a population-based autopsy study. Ann Med. 2008;40:232–239. doi: 10.1080/07853890701842988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruberg FL, Berk JL. Transthyretin (TTR) cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2012;126:1286–1300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.078915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sperry BW, Vranian MN, Hachamovitch R, Joshi H, Ikram A, Phelan D, Hanna M. Subtype-specific interactions and prognosis in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e002877. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ng B, Connors LH, Davidoff R, Skinner M, Falk RH. Senile systemic amyloidosis presenting with heart failure: a comparison with light chain-associated amyloidosis. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1425–1429. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.12.1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet. 2016;387:2641–2654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Falk RH. Cardiac amyloidosis: a treatable disease, often overlooked. Circulation. 2011;124:1079–1085. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sayed RH, Rogers D, Khan F, Wechalekar AD, Lachmann HJ, Fontana M, Mahmood S, Sachchithanantham S, Patel K, Hawkins PN, Whelan CJ, Gillmore JD. A study of implanted cardiac rhythm recorders in advanced cardiac AL amyloidosis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1098–1105. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gertz MA, Comenzo R, Falk RH, Fermand JP, Hazenberg BP, Hawkins PN, Merlini G, Moreau P, Ronco P, Sanchorawala V, Sezer O, Solomon A, Grateau G. Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18–22 April 2004. Am J Hematol. 2005;79:319–328. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dahlem K, Michels G, Kobe C, Bunck AC, Ten Freyhaus H, Pfister R. Diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis based on multimodality imaging. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106:471–473. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1092-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fritschka M, Schlegl M, Borges A, Werner M, Gebker R, Pieske B, Kelle S. Unusual case of ATTR amyloidosis with cardiac manifestation and situs inversus totalis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106:311–316. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1067-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Lacy MQ, Burritt MF, Therneau TM, Greipp PR, Witzig TE, Lust JA, Rajkumar SV, Fonseca R, Zeldenrust SR, McGregor CG, Jaffe AS. Serum cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a staging system for primary systemic amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3751–3757. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grogan M, Scott CG, Kyle RA, Zeldenrust SR, Gertz MA, Lin G, Klarich KW, Miller WL, Maleszewski JJ, Dispenzieri A. Natural history of wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and risk stratification using a novel staging system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1014–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Narang R, Cleland JG, Erhardt L, Ball SG, Coats AJ, Cowley AJ, Dargie HJ, Hall AS, Hampton JR, Poole-Wilson PA. Mode of death in chronic heart failure. A request and proposition for more accurate classification. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:1390–1403. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rickenbacher P, Pfisterer M, Burkard T, Kiowski W, Follath F, Burckhardt D, Schindler R, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Investigators T-C Why and how do elderly patients with heart failure die? Insights from the TIME-CHF study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:1218–1229. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B, Elliott PM, Merlini G, Waddington-Cruz M, Kristen AV, Grogan M, Witteles R, Damy T, Drachman BM, Shah SJ, Hanna M, Judge DP, Barsdorf AI, Huber P, Patterson TA, Riley S, Schumacher J, Stewart M, Sultan MB, Rapezzi C, Investigators A-AS Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1007–1016. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vaduganathan M, Patel RB, Michel A, Shah SJ, Senni M, Gheorghiade M, Butler J. Mode of death in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:556–569. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Siepen FAD, Bauer R, Voss A, Hein S, Aurich M, Riffel J, Mereles D, Rocken C, Buss SJ, Katus HA, Kristen AV. Predictors of survival stratification in patients with wild-type cardiac amyloidosis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:158–169. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mohty D, Pradel S, Magne J, Fadel B, Boulogne C, Petitalot V, Raboukhi S, Darodes N, Damy T, Aboyans V, Jaccard A. Prevalence and prognostic impact of left-sided valve thickening in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106:331–340. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1058-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brenner DA, Jain M, Pimentel DR, Wang B, Connors LH, Skinner M, Apstein CS, Liao R. Human amyloidogenic light chains directly impair cardiomyocyte function through an increase in cellular oxidant stress. Circ Res. 2004;94:1008–1010. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000126569.75419.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kristen AV, Dengler TJ, Hegenbart U, Schonland SO, Goldschmidt H, Sack FU, Voss F, Becker R, Katus HA, Bauer A. Prophylactic implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with severe cardiac amyloidosis and high risk for sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin G, Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Grogan M, Brady PA. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:793–798. doi: 10.1111/jce.12123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng D, Edwards WD, Oh JK, Chandrasekaran K, Grogan M, Martinez MW, Syed IS, Hughes DA, Lust JA, Jaffe AS, Gertz MA, Klarich KW. Intracardiac thrombosis and embolism in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2007;116:2420–2426. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.697763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roberts WC, Waller BF. Cardiac amyloidosis causing cardiac dysfunction: analysis of 54 necropsy patients. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52:137–146. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90084-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Adams D, Gonzalez-Duarte A, O’Riordan WD, Yang CC, Ueda M, Kristen AV, Tournev I, Schmidt HH, Coelho T, Berk JL, Lin KP, Vita G, Attarian S, Plante-Bordeneuve V, Mezei MM, Campistol JM, Buades J, Brannagan TH, 3rd, Kim BJ, Oh J, Parman Y, Sekijima Y, Hawkins PN, Solomon SD, Polydefkis M, Dyck PJ, Gandhi PJ, Goyal S, Chen J, Strahs AL, Nochur SV, Sweetser MT, Garg PP, Vaishnaw AK, Gollob JA, Suhr OB. Patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic, for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:11–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Benson MD, Waddington-Cruz M, Berk JL, Polydefkis M, Dyck PJ, Wang AK, Plante-Bordeneuve V, Barroso FA, Merlini G, Obici L, Scheinberg M, Brannagan TH, 3rd, Litchy WJ, Whelan C, Drachman BM, Adams D, Heitner SB, Conceicao I, Schmidt HH, Vita G, Campistol JM, Gamez J, Gorevic PD, Gane E, Shah AM, Solomon SD, Monia BP, Hughes SG, Kwoh TJ, McEvoy BW, Jung SW, Baker BF, Ackermann EJ, Gertz MA, Coelho T. Inotersen treatment for patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:22–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]