Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0227599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227599

Ischemia and reperfusion injury in superficial inferior epigastric artery-based vascularized lymph node flaps

David P Perrault 1,#, Gene K Lee 1,#, Antoun Bouz 1,#, Cynthia Sung 1, Roy Yu 1, Austin J Pourmoussa 1, Sun Young Park 1, Gene H Kim 2, Wan Jiao 1, Ketan M Patel 1, Young-Kwon Hong 1, Alex K Wong 1,*
Editor: Cesario Bianchi3
PMCID: PMC6954070  PMID: 31923917

Abstract

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a promising treatment modality for lymphedema; however, how lymphatic tissue responds to ischemia has not been well defined. This study investigates the cellular changes that occur in lymph nodes in response to ischemia and reperfusion. Lymph node containing superficial epigastric artery-based groin flaps were isolated in Prox-1 EGFP rats which permits real time identification of lymphatic tissue by green fluorescence during flap dissection. Flaps were subjected to ischemia for either 1, 2, 4, or 8 hours, by temporarily occluding the vascular pedicle. Flaps were harvested after 0 hours, 24 hours, or 5 days of reperfusion. Using EGFP signal guidance, lymph nodes were isolated from the flaps and tissue morphology, cell apoptosis, and inflammatory cytokines were quantified and analyzed via histology, immunostaining, and rtPCR. There was a significant increase in collagen deposition and tissue fibrosis in lymph nodes after 4 and 8 hours of ischemia compared to 1 and 2 hours, as assessed by picrosirius red staining. Cell apoptosis significantly increased after 4 hours of ischemia in all harvest times. In tissue subject to 4 hours of ischemia, longer reperfusion periods were associated with increased rates of CD3+ and CD45+ cell apoptosis. rtPCR analysis demonstrated significantly increased expression of CXCL1/GRO-α with 2 hours of ischemia and increased PECAM-1 and TNF-α expression with 1 hour of ischemia. Significant cell death and changes in tissue morphology do not occur until after 4 hours of ischemia; however, analysis of inflammatory biomarkers suggests that ischemia reperfusion injury can occur with as little as 2 hours of ischemia.

Introduction

Lymphedema is a chronic progressive disease characterized by tissue swelling and lymph fluid stasis that ultimately leads to tissue fibrosis, limb disfigurement, and loss of function. In the United States, lymphedema most commonly occurs following oncological therapy, such as surgery or radiation [14]. There is no curative treatment for lymphedema, but vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has been shown to be an effective surgical treatment modality for secondary lymphedema [513]. The success of VLNT is dependent on the survival of lymph nodes within transplanted tissue, as they are the functional units responsible for fluid transport.

The signs of ischemia in vascularized lymph nodes are less readily appreciable than, for example, muscle flaps. The lymph nodes are often encased in a cushion of fat, which has the potential to mask subtle visual signs of lymph node ischemia or ischemia injury. Furthermore, other than partial or complete flap loss, the success or failure of a VLNT is a long-term clinical outcome and not known in the immediate post-operative period. Therefore, the perioperative appearance of VLNT flaps may not be sensitive enough to correlate with outcome. As such, knowing how lymphatic tissue responds to ischemia-reperfusion injury and defining a critical ischemia time would be clinically valuable.

Ischemia is defined as a decrease or absence of blood delivery to tissue [14]. Critical ischemia time is the maximum amount of time a tissue can withstand ischemia without evidence of injury [15]. Most tissues can tolerate ischemia without significant injury if the ischemic period is relatively short. During free tissue transfer, ischemia time can range from 45 minutes to 3 hours [16]. Ischemia time is a potentially modifiable factor influencing the long-term viability of transplanted tissue. While a short period of ischemia is inevitable during free tissue transfer, prolonged ischemia initiates a cascade of cellular changes that result in irreversible cell membrane damage, which translates to poor post-operative outcomes. In addition to the deleterious effects of prolonged ischemia, organ reperfusion also accelerates the rate of cellular damage that leads to apoptosis [17].

Critical ischemia time in muscle, skin, and other tissues have been extensively investigated in animal and human models [15, 1820]. Relatively little is known about the effect of ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury on lymph nodes and lymphatic tissue [21, 22]. Since we recently developed and characterized a transgenic rat which facilitates in situ real time visualization of lymphatic tissue (Prox1-EGFP), this has enabled us to precisely identify and isolate lymph nodes from surrounding tissue and analyze the cellular changes that occurred within lymph nodes [23]. Here, we conducted a detailed study on the effect of ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion on lymph nodes, investigating the biochemical and physiological changes of lymph nodes in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Materials and methods

Animals

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Southern California. The Prox1-EGFP reporter rats used in this study were developed previously, characterized our laboratory, and described by Jung, E. et. al. [23], Specifically, a Prox1-harboring BAC (RP23-360I16), where the EGFP gene was inserted distal to the mouse Prox1 proximal promoter was used to generate a Sprague-Dawley Prox1-EGFP founder line at Cyagen Biosciences and subsequently expanded at our facility. In this experiment, forty-eight adult Prox1-EGFP rats weighing between 300 and 500 grams, were used. The animals were housed in a temperature and light controlled environment and fed a standard rodent diet and water ad libitum. Hydrogel and nutrient rich gel were provided postoperatively. The animals were observed twice daily, their behavior was assessed for signs of distress, and their wounds checked for infection, dehiscence, and other complications. At the experimental endpoint, animals were euthanized by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by a confirmatory double thoracotomy.

Operative procedure

Rats were anesthetized with 1mL/100g of a ketamine/xylazine cocktail (100mg/kg ketamine + 10mg/kg xylazine) via intraperitoneal injection and were given approximately 1mg/kg slow release buprenorphine subcutaneously immediately prior to surgery. Epigastric flaps were created as previously described [23, 24].

Briefly, the abdomen was shaved, a depilatory cream was applied, the area was prepped with povidone-iodine scrub solution, and a 2–3 cm skin incision was made in line with the inguinal crease. The subcutaneous tissue flap was dissected free from the skin, verified to contain lymph nodes by green fluorescent signal, and further isolated based on the superficial inferior epigastric artery and vein (SIEA and SIEV). The SIEA and SIEV were then skeletonized under a surgical microscope (M500N; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) down to their origin off the femoral vessels. All perforating vessels were either ligated or cauterized to ensure that the vascular pedicle consisted of only the SIEA and SIEV. The femoral artery and vein distal and proximal to the SIEA and SIEV were then skeletonized (Fig 1A), and microsurgical vessel clamps were placed on the femoral vessels proximal and distal the SIEA and SIEV (Fig 1B) to achieve total ischemia. The flap was placed back into the animal, and the incision was closed with simple interrupted 4–0 Vicryl (Ethicon) sutures. This procedure was then repeated on the contralateral side.

Fig 1. Blood supply and ischemia induction of the groin flaps.

Fig 1

(A) Gross image of the skeletonized vessels supplying the groin flap created. (B) Gross image depicting clamping of the distal and proximal femoral vascular bundle to achieve complete ischemia in the groin flap.

Tissue processing and staining

Lymph node specimens were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin & eosin and Picrosirius red. A double-staining assay was also performed using Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) assay and immunofluorescence staining. Briefly, lymph node sections were deparaffinized, underwent antigen retrieval using a sodium citrate buffer, permeabilized, and then incubated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD45 overnight (1:200 rabbit anti-rat; ab5690, ab10558, Abcam). Tissues were then washed in PBS and incubated with red secondary antibodies for CD3 and CD45 (1:200 goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Next, the In-Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used according to the manufacturer protocol. Finally, sections were mounted and stained with DAPI.

Collagen content within the harvested lymph nodes was quantified with Picrosirius red staining. Samples were deparaffinized, rehydrated with distilled water, then incubated in Picrosirius red solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for one hour. The samples were then washed in an acid bath, dehydrated using absolute alcohol, and cleared in a xylene bath. Images were obtained and quantified to assess the degree of tissue fibrosis.

Image analysis

The images of the double-staining assay were obtained with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope, and the immunofluorescence stained slides were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethseda, MD). For each analysis, three high-power fields per section were randomly selected and then analyzed by a blinded reviewer. First, the number of TUNEL-positive cells per square millimeter was quantified. Next, the percentage of apoptotic CD3+ cells was calculated by dividing the number cells positive for both CD3 and TUNEL by the total number of CD3+. The same analysis was performed for CD45+ cells.

The images of the Picrosirius red staining were obtained with a Keyence BZ-X700 microscope (Itasca, IL), and the samples were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethseda, MD). A custom macro was written in ImageJ Macro language to calculate the percent area of collagen for tissue stained with Picro-Sirius Red by using the Color Threshold function in ImageJ (Appendix A: Picrisirius_red_ijm). The macro determines the red pixels in an image by using threshold settings of hue, saturation, and brightness. The threshold settings were determined by using a test set of 106 images. The macro then converts the red pixels into individual particles and calculates the percent area that is stained. The percentage of collagen area is calculated as the area of Picrosirius red stained tissue divided by the total area in order to quantify tissue fibrosis.

rtPCR

Tissue collected for rtPCR was placed into cryovials and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen tissue was ground with a mortar and pestle, and total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 1 μg of total RNA was used to construct cDNA using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen, Frederick, Maryland, USA). Real time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed with the PerfeCTa SYBR Green Supermix (Quanta Biosciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA) using the CFX96 Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The specificity of the amplification reactions was monitored by melting curve analysis. The threshold cycle (Ct) value for each gene was normalized to the Ct value for GAPDH.

The specific primers used were: 5’-GGTGTGAACGGATTTGGCCG-3’ forward and 5’-GTGCCGTTGAACTTGCCGTG-3’ reverse for Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5’-GCTGCTCACCATGCTGCTCT-3’ forward and 5’-CAAGGCACTGCAGGGTCAGT-3’ reverse for Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM-1), 5’-TTGCCTTGACCCTGAAGCCC-3’ forward and 5’-AGCGTTCACCAGACAGACGC-3’ reverse for CXCL1/GRO-α, 5’-TCTCATTCCTGCTCGTGGCG-3’ forward and 5’-GGGCTACGGGCTTGTCACTC-3’ reverse for Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and 5’-xCCTACCACACTCACGGACGC-3’ forward and 5’-CCACAGCCGGGTTGGTGTAA-3’ reverse for Mucin-1 (MUC1).

Statistics

Normality of the study sample was confirmed using the Anderson-Darling test. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests were used to determine mean differences between groups, and statistical significance was established using a cut-off of p < 0.05. All analyses and graphs were generated in GraphPad PRISM8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA), and values were reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

Ischemia and reperfusion of vascularized lymph node flaps

Lymph node flaps based on the superficial inferior epigastric artery and vein (SIEA/V) as described in the methods section were elevated and rendered ischemic by atraumatic occlusion of the femoral artery and vein proximal and distal to the pedicle for 1, 2, 4, or 8 hours (n = 12 rats per ischemic period; n = 48 total), after which the incision was reopened, and the microvascular clamps were removed to allow vascular reperfusion (Fig 2). The flaps were placed back into the animal, wounds were closed, and a post-operative bandage with anchor tape was applied to prevent the animal from disturbing the flap, while preserving the ability to ambulate.

Fig 2. Schematic of experimental groups.

Fig 2

Timeline depicting induction of ischemia (black arrows), re-establishment of blood flow (red arrows), and time of harvest (blue arrows) in groups subject to (A) 1 hour (B) 2 hours, (C) 4 hours, and (D) 8 hours of ischemia.

At 0 hours (control), 24 hours, and 5 days lymph nodes within the epigastric flaps were precisely visualized, using GFP fluorescence microscopy (MZ10F; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), dissected free from the surrounding adipose tissue and harvested for further analysis (n = 4 per time point).

Gross tissue analysis

To the unaided eye, the flaps demonstrated changes consistent with ischemia and reperfusion injury (Fig 3). Flaps harvested 24 hours or 5 days after reperfusion were more edematous than those harvested immediately. Tissue subject to 8 hours of ischemia followed by reperfusion were firm to the touch and ecchymotic, which was not seen in other groups.

Fig 3. SIEA flaps grossly demonstrated greater ischemic change with increasing ischemia time.

Fig 3

Gross photos depicting morphological changes that occur in groin flaps after exposure to various periods of ischemia and reperfusion. As ischemia and reperfusion times increase, the tissue exhibits signs of ischemic injury.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis

In order to asses ischemia-induced morphological changes, whole lymph nodes were cross-sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Analysis of the stained tissues revealed preservation of the nodal structure with 1 and 2 hours of ischemia, but significant fibrotic change occurred after 4 and 8 hours of ischemia (Fig 4). Lymph nodes subject to 4 and 8 hours of ischemia exhibited increased areas of fat deposition, fibrosis, and decreased cellularity.

Fig 4. Hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis of lymph node cross-sections.

Fig 4

Representative images of lymph node cross-sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin after various ischemia times. There is progressive nodal infarction with loss of viable lymphocytes. Coagulation necrosis is present at 4 hours and structural changes to the lymph node at 8 hours with loss of architecture and contraction. X20 magnification, x1.0 zoom. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Picrosirius red staining analysis

To quantify fibrosis in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury, lymph nodes were stained with Picrosirius red. Collagen content increases with ischemia time (Fig 5A). Specifically, the 4 hour to 8 hour ischemia time groups showed significantly increased percentage of collagen compared to the 2 hour group (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. Lymph node collagen content increases significantly at 4 and 8 hours of ischemia.

Fig 5

(A) Representative microphotographs of Picrosirius red stained lymph nodes after varying periods of ischemia, all harvested immediately after reperfusion. (B) Quantitative analysis of collagen content in lymph nodes in three random high-powered fields per lymph node. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 12 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Immunofluorescence staining analysis

We measured the rate of cell apoptosis using the TUNEL assay (Fig 6). Between 2 and 4 hours of ischemia, the rate of cellular apoptosis increased from 1264 cells/mm2 to 6024 cells/mm2 (Fig 7A, P<0.0001). The overall apoptosis rate increased within 24 hours of reperfusion and continued to rise with time. In flaps subject to 1 hour of ischemia, 24 hours of reperfusion was associated with an increase in apoptotic cell density. Specifically, apoptotic cell density was 977 cells/mm2 at 0 hours of reperfusion and 2460 cells/mm2 at 24 hours of reperfusion (Fig 8A, P<0.01). A reperfusion time of 5 days was associated with a dramatic increase in the apoptotic cell density, 5324 cells/mm2 (P<0.0001). Flaps subject to 2 hours of ischemia displayed an almost identical trend. Twenty-four hours of reperfusion was associated with a total apoptotic cell density of 3064 cells/mm2, compared to 1265 cells/mm2 at 0 hours of reperfusion (Fig 8B, P<0.01). Similarly, 5 days of reperfusion was associated with in elevated apoptotic cell density (5441 cells/mm2, P<0.0001). Flaps subject to 4 and 8 hours of ischemia displayed fairly high rates of apoptosis that did not increase significantly with longer reperfusion times.

Fig 6. Histologic and immunofluorescence analysis for TUNEL in rat lymph node cross-sections.

Fig 6

Representative images of lymph node cross sections of TUNEL staining (green) with DAPI (blue) after various ischemia times with immediate harvest. x63 magnification, x1.0 zoom. Scale bar = 20 um.

Fig 7. Longer ischemia time increases frequency of cell apoptosis.

Fig 7

Quantitative analysis of cells staining positive for: (A) TUNEL (all apoptotic cells); (B) TUNEL and CD3 (apoptotic T cells); (C) TUNEL and CD45 (apoptotic leukocytes). All samples were from tissue harvested immediately after reperfusion was established. Analysis was completed in three random high-powered fields per lymph node. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 12 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Fig 8. Apoptotic cell density increases with increasing harvest time.

Fig 8

Quantitative analysis of the density of apoptotic cells in lymph nodes subject to (A) 1-hour, (B) 2-hours, (C) 4-hours, and (D) 8-hours of ischemia. There is a trend of increasing apoptotic cell density as harvest time increases. Analysis was completed in three random high-powered fields per lymph node. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 16 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Examination of TUNEL stained lymph nodes demonstrated that the majority of apoptotic cells were localized to the periphery and cortical areas of the lymph nodes (Fig 9). Based on the anatomy and composition of lymph nodes, we hypothesized that these apoptotic cells were likely B and T cells [25]. To test this hypothesis, we used antibodies for CD3, which is specific for T-cells, and CD45, which is a pan-leukocyte marker (Figs 10 and 11). In tissues harvested immediately, cellular apoptosis became significant after 2 hours of ischemia had passed. However, the rate of apoptosis in leukocytes and T cells demonstrated a more delayed effect. Apoptotic leukocytes and T cell levels remained relatively low at 1, 2, and 4 hours of ischemia but dramatically increased at a time point between 4 and 8 hours of ischemia. In the flaps harvested immediately, when the ischemic period was increased from 4 hours to 8 hours, the percentage of apoptotic T cells increased from 9.3% to 72.6% (Fig 7B, P<0.0001) while the percentage of apoptotic leukocytes increased from 12.7% to 84.5% (Fig 7C, P<0.0001).

Fig 9. Histologic and immunofluorescence analysis for TUNEL in rat lymph node cross-sections.

Fig 9

Representative images of lymph node cross sections of TUNEL staining (green) with DAPI (blue) after various ischemia times. x10 magnification, x1.0 zoom. Scale bar = 100 um.

Fig 10. Histologic and immunofluorescence analysis for CD3+ cells and apoptotic CD3+ cells in rat lymph node cross-sections.

Fig 10

Representative images of lymph node cross sections of double immunofluorescence staining for CD3 (red) and TUNEL (green) with DAPI (blue) after various ischemia times with immediate harvest. x63 magnification, x1.0 zoom. Scale bar = 25 um.

Fig 11. Histologic and immunofluorescence analysis for CD45+ cells and apoptotic CD45+ cells in rat lymph node cross-sections.

Fig 11

Representative images of lymph node cross sections of double immunofluorescence staining for CD45 (red) and TUNEL (green) with DAPI (blue) after various ischemia times with immediate harvest. x63 magnification, x1.0 zoom. Scale bar = 20 um.

In tissues subject to 4 hours of ischemia, apoptosis also increased considerably within 24 hours of reperfusion. The percentage of apoptotic T cells increased from 9.31% to 19.22% (Fig 12B, P<0.001). Similarly, the percentage of apoptotic leukocytes increased from 12.76% to 33.85% but then dramatically increased to 87.62% after 5 days of reperfusion (Fig 12C, P<0.0001). Interestingly, the rates of overall apoptosis did not show any significant changes with longer periods of reperfusion; all apoptosis rates were fairly high for tissues harvested immediately, after 24 hours, and after 5 days.

Fig 12. With an ischemic period of 4 hours, average percentage of apoptotic leukocytes increases with longer harvest time.

Fig 12

Quantitative analysis of: (A) apoptotic cell density in tissue subject to 4 hours of ischemia; (B) percentage of apoptotic T cells in tissue subject to 4 hours of ischemia; (C) percentage of apoptotic leukocytes in tissue subject to 4 hours of ischemia. Analysis was completed in three random high-powered fields per lymph node. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 4 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

qRT-PCR

Significant molecular changes occur in response to ischemia [20]. Based on a literature review, we chose to test a panel of biomarkers that have been previous implicated in ischemia and ischemia reperfusion injury [2633]. qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated significant changes in gene expression for all biomarkers measured. Although elevated gene expression was observed after 1 hour of ischemia in tissue harvested immediately after reperfusion, statistical significance was not reached until 2 hours of ischemia. Flaps subject to 2 hours of ischemia demonstrated upregulated CXCL1/GRO-α (40x; Fig 13A), PECAM-1 (3x; Fig 14A), and MUC1 (5x; Fig 15A). After 4 hours, upregulation of CXCL1/GRO-α (22x; Fig 13A), PECAM-1 (3x; Fig 14A), MUC1 (6x; Fig 15A), and TNF-α (3x; Fig 16A) was observed.

Fig 13. CXCL1/GRO-α mRNA levels significantly increase after 2 hours of ischemia.

Fig 13

The relative mRNA levels of CXCL1/GRO-α are compared at various ischemia times. Tissue was harvested (A) immediately, (B) after 24 hours of reperfusion, or (C) 5 days of reperfusion. Elevated mRNA levels indicate increased gene expression relative to animals not subject to ischemia. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 4 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Fig 14. PECAM-1 mRNA levels increase after 2 hours of ischemia.

Fig 14

Quantitative rtPCR analysis of relative PECAM-1 mRNA levels. Tissue was harvested (A) immediately, (B) after 24 hours of reperfusion, or (C) 5 days of reperfusion. Elevated PECAM-1 mRNA levels indicate increased gene expression relative to animals not subject to ischemia. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 4 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Fig 15. MUC-1 levels increase shortly after induction of ischemia.

Fig 15

Quantitative rtPCR analysis of relative MUC1 mRNA levels. Tissue was harvested (A) immediately, (B) after 24 hours of reperfusion, or (C) 5 days of reperfusion. Elevated MUC-1 mRNA levels indicate increased gene expression relative to animals not subject to ischemia. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 4 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Fig 16. TNF-α levels are upregulated in response to ischemia.

Fig 16

Quantitative rtPCR analysis of relative TNF-α mRNA levels. Tissue was harvested (A) immediately, (B) after 24 hours of reperfusion, or (C) 5 days of reperfusion. Elevated TNF-α mRNA levels indicate increased gene expression relative to animals not subject to ischemia. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. N = 4 lymph nodes per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

In tissue harvested 24 hours after reperfusion, significant changes in gene expression were seen as early as after 1 hour of ischemia: PECAM-1 (3x; Fig 14B), MUC1 (6x; Fig 15B), and TNF-α (3x; Fig 16B). Tissue subject to 2 hours of ischemia demonstrated upregulation of CXCL1/GRO-α (27x; Fig 13B), PECAM-1 (4x; Fig 14B), MUC1 (10x; Fig 15B), and TNF-α (4x; Fig 16B). There were no significant differences in gene expression following 8 hours of ischemia.

CXCL1/GRO-α levels returned to baseline in ischemic tissue that had been allowed 5 days of reperfusion, whereas levels of PECAM-1, MUC1, and TNF-α in the same tissue remained elevated (Figs 13C, 14C, 15C and 16C). After 1 hour of ischemia, upregulation of PECAM-1 (2x, Fig 14C) was observed. After 2 hours of ischemia gene expression was significantly elevated in: PECAM-1 (4x, Fig 14C), MUC1 (5x, Fig 15C), and TNF-α (6x, Fig 16C).

Discussion

Prolonged ischemia and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury as the potential to significantly impact outcomes in free tissue transfer. Although the critical ischemia time of most tissue types has been comprehensively described, we have a limited understanding of the effect ischemia has on lymph nodes [15, 18, 19, 34]. Vascularized lymph node transfer has emerged as a viable option for the treatment of early lymphedema. The physical appearance of fat and lymphatic tissue is likely not a reliable marker for small but clinically significant ischemia-reperfusion injury. Additionally, a successful outcome from a VLNT is often determined long after the initial surgery. Given these unique characteristics of VLNT, understanding how lymph nodes tolerate ischemia and even defining a critical ischemia time would be highly useful information for clinical practice. We aimed to quantify the apoptosis and fibrosis, as well as describe changes in ischemia-reperfusion specific gene expression in lymph nodes after ischemia and reperfusion. We also aimed to define a critical ischemia time.

Not surprisingly, and consistent with previous findings, the degree of cell injury and subsequent apoptosis increased with ischemia time [21]. Our data demonstrates a significant increase in the rate of cell apoptosis beginning at 4 hours of ischemia. Additionally, immune cell death increased proportionally with prolonged reperfusion, with significant ischemia-reperfusion injury after 24 hours of reperfusion. This suggests that the immune cell components of lymph nodes are especially sensitive to reperfusion injury. Finally, lymph nodes underwent a significant fibrotic change after 4 hours of ischemia. Intuitively, we would hypothesize that the significant fibrosis of lymph nodes at 4 hours of ischemia would have an impact on the lymphatic drainage, however, functional studies of lymphatic flow are needed.

Upregulation of the proinflammatory cytokines CXCL1/GRO-α, TNF-α, MUC1, and PECAM-1 was as a marker of ischemia reperfusion injury in lymph nodes. Dynamic changes in these cytokines have been previously implicated in ischemia reperfusion injury. For example, CXCL1/GRO-α is upregulated in the early phases of cerebral ischemia, and promotes leukocyte migration to the inflamed tissue [29]. Enhanced levels of TNF-α expression have been observed following ischemia in both the brain [26, 30] and cardiac tissue [28]. Serum PECAM-1 levels have been shown to be elevated following ischemia reperfusion in rats [33]. Additionally, blocking PECAM-1 attenuated neutrophil migration and accumulation in rat muscle flaps, demonstrating an overall protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury [31, 32].

Subjecting groin flaps to as little as 2 hours of ischemia resulted in significant changes in lymphatic gene expression. A 40-fold transient increase in the expression of CXCL1/GRO-α resulted after just two hours of ischemia. However, prolonged reperfusion (5 days) returned expression levels of CXCL1/GRO-α back to baseline whereas MUC1, PECAM-1, and TNF-α expression remained elevated after the same reperfusion period. CXCL1/GRO-α levels peaked with 2 hours of ischemia in tissue harvested immediately after reperfusion was established. PECAM-1 and MUC1 both peaked with 2 hours of ischemia and 24 hours of reperfusion. TNF-α levels peaked with 2 hours of ischemia and 5 days of reperfusion. These results suggest that CXCL1/GRO-α may be a valuable biomarker to monitor ischemia-reperfusion injury in lymph node flaps due to the dramatic increase in gene expression in response to ischemia.

Understanding the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury on lymphatic tissue can help guide the perioperative management of patients undergoing VLNT. VLNT is promising therapeutic. A greater understanding of the ischemic tolerance of lymphatic tissue has the potential to improve outcomes and prevent complications [35]. If lymph nodes reach their critical ischemia time intraoperatively, the lymphatic tissue will lose viability. Since the lymph nodes are typically enveloped within fat, which is highly ischemia tolerant, reaching the critical ischemia time of a lymph node may not result in flap loss, but could result in loss of function of the graft. Therefore, a defined critical ischemia time would be a highly practical piece of information. Furthermore, beyond the bedside application of a critical ischemia time, investigating rates of cellular apoptosis, effects on the adaptive immune response, and gene expression of various cytokines may shed light on the mechanisms of reperfusion injury, eventually leading to targeted therapies to block or attenuate the pathways that lead to tissue damage.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that significant ischemia-reperfusion injury occurs in lymph nodes after 4 hours of ischemia. Thus, vascularized lymph node flaps that are exposed to 4 hours of ischemia during VLNT are at risk for irreversible cellular injury that could impair lymph node flap function. Further exploration of the inflammatory cascade specific to lymph nodes may elucidate useful biomarkers in predicting ischemia-reperfusion injury and, ultimately, flap failure.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Funded by Alex Wong - 1K08HL132110-01A1. Young Kwon Hong - 5R01HL141857 & 5R01DK114645. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Warren AG, Brorson H, Borud LJ, Slavin SA. Lymphedema: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(4):464–72. 10.1097/01.sap.0000257149.42922.7e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cormier JN, Askew RL, Mungovan KS, Xing Y, Ross MI, Armer JM. Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema. Cancer. 2010;116(22):5138–49. 10.1002/cncr.25458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hinrichs CS, Watroba NL, Rezaishiraz H, Giese W, Hurd T, Fassl KA, et al. Lymphedema secondary to postmastectomy radiation: incidence and risk factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(6):573–80. 10.1245/ASO.2004.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Petrek JA, Senie RT, Peters M, Rosen PP. Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis. Cancer. 2001;92(6):1368–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akita S, Mitsukawa N, Kuriyama M, Kubota Y, Hasegawa M, Tokumoto H, et al. Comparison of vascularized supraclavicular lymph node transfer and lymphaticovenular anastomosis for advanced stage lower extremity lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(5):573–9. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Allen RJ Jr., Cheng MH. Lymphedema surgery: Patient selection and an overview of surgical techniques. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(8):923–31. 10.1002/jso.24170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Basta MN, Gao LL, Wu LC. Operative treatment of peripheral lymphedema: a systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of lymphovenous microsurgery and tissue transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):905–13. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Wu CW, Yang CY, Lin CY, Henry SL, et al. The mechanism of vascularized lymph node transfer for lymphedema: natural lymphaticovenous drainage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(2):192e–8e. 10.1097/01.prs.0000437257.78327.5b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Brucker B, Zeltzer A, Seidenstuecker K, Hendrickx B, Adriaenssens N, Hamdi M. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Quality of Life after Lymph Node Transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(6):1673–80. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dionyssiou D, Demiri E, Tsimponis A, Sarafis A, Mpalaris V, Tatsidou G, et al. A randomized control study of treating secondary stage II breast cancer- related lymphoedema with free lymph node transfer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2016;156(1):73–9. 10.1007/s10549-016-3716-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Glasgow M, Platek M, Ashary Z, Kuhn J, et al. Free vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic evidence based review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(9):1234–47. 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patel KM, Lin CY, Cheng MH. A Prospective Evaluation of Lymphedema-Specific Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(7):2424–30. 10.1245/s10434-014-4276-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tobbia D, Semple J, Baker A, Dumont D, Johnston M. Experimental assessment of autologous lymph node transplantation as treatment of postsurgical lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):777–86. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, Korthuis RJ. Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. International review of cell and molecular biology. 2012;298:229–317. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394309-5.00006-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kerrigan CL, Daniel RK. Critical ischemia time and the failing skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(6):986–9. 10.1097/00006534-198206000-00014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Siemionow M, Arslan E. Ischemia/reperfusion injury: a review in relation to free tissue transfers. Microsurgery. 2004;24(6):468–75. 10.1002/micr.20060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eefting F, Rensing B, Wigman J, Pannekoek WJ, Liu WM, Cramer MJ, et al. Role of apoptosis in reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61(3):414–26. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.12.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eckert P, Schnackerz K. Ischemic tolerance of human skeletal muscle. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;26(1):77–84. 10.1097/00000637-199101000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zelt RG, Olding M, Kerrigan CL, Daniel RK. Primary and secondary critical ischemia times of myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78(4):498–503. 10.1097/00006534-198610000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nguyen GK, Hwang BH, Zhang Y, Monahan JF, Davis GB, Lee YS, et al. Novel biomarkers of arterial and venous ischemia in microvascular flaps. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e71628 10.1371/journal.pone.0071628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang CY, Ho OA, Cheng MH, Hsiao HY. Critical Ischemia Time, Perfusion, and Drainage Function of Vascularized Lymph Nodes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):688–97. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tinhofer IE, Yang CY, Chen C, Cheng MH. Impacts of arterial ischemia or venous occlusion on vascularized groin lymph nodes in a rat model. J Surg Oncol. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jung E, Gardner D, Choi D, Park E, Jin Seong Y, Yang S, et al. Development and Characterization of A Novel Prox1-EGFP Lymphatic and Schlemm's Canal Reporter Rat. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):5577 10.1038/s41598-017-06031-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shesol BF, Nakashima R, Alavi A, Hamilton RW. Successful lymph node transplantation in rats, with restoration of lymphatic function. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(6):817–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Benahmed F, Ely S, Lu TT. Lymph node vascular-stromal growth and function as a potential target for controlling immunity. Clin Immunol. 2012;144(2):109–16. 10.1016/j.clim.2012.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barone FC, Arvin B, White RF, Miller A, Webb CL, Willette RN, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha. A mediator of focal ischemic brain injury. Stroke. 1997;28(6):1233–44. 10.1161/01.str.28.6.1233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bokhari FA, Shakoori TA, Butt A, Ghafoor F. TNF-alpha: a risk factor for ischemic stroke. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC. 2014;26(2):111–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gurevitch J, Frolkis I, Yuhas Y, Paz Y, Matsa M, Mohr R, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is released from the isolated heart undergoing ischemia and reperfusion. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1996;28(1):247–52. 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00105-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Losy J, Zaremba J, Skrobanski P. CXCL1 (GRO-alpha) chemokine in acute ischaemic stroke patients. Folia Neuropathol. 2005;43(2):97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maddahi A, Kruse LS, Chen QW, Edvinsson L. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and TNF-alpha receptors in cerebral arteries following cerebral ischemia in rat. Journal of neuroinflammation. 2011;8:107 10.1186/1742-2094-8-107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nourshargh S, Krombach F, Dejana E. The role of JAM-A and PECAM-1 in modulating leukocyte infiltration in inflamed and ischemic tissues. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2006;80(4):714–8. 10.1189/jlb.1105645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Turegun M, Gudemez E, Newman P, Zins J, Siemionow M. Blockade of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in muscle flaps at microcirculatory level. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(4):1033–40. 10.1097/00006534-199909020-00021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang H, Yan Z, Qiu L, Hu Z, Qian W, Xu L. Dynamic changes of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31) on pulmonary injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Irish journal of medical science. 2011;180(2):483–8. 10.1007/s11845-010-0644-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Knight RJ, Dikman S, Liu H, Martinelli GP. Cold ischemic injury accelerates the progression to chronic rejection in a rat cardiac allograft model. Transplantation. 1997;64(8):1102–7. 10.1097/00007890-199710270-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Scaglioni MF, Arvanitakis M, Chen YC, Giovanoli P, Chia-Shen Yang J, Chang EI. Comprehensive review of vascularized lymph node transfers for lymphedema: Outcomes and complications. Microsurgery. 2018;38(2):222–9. 10.1002/micr.30079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Cesario Bianchi

31 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-25885

Ischemia and reperfusion injury in vascularized lymph node flaps

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wong,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address all comments from reviewers 1 and 3 and my specific questions.. Submit a revised version at your earliest convenience.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Dec 15 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Cesario Bianchi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. At this time, we request that you  please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the source of the rats used in the study  

(2) Please include the method of euthanasia  

Thank you for your attention to these requests.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Dr Wong,

Thank you for your submission. Please answer to every reviewers comments and make changes to the manuscript your find necessary.

I have few comments?

- the histology figures are not o f good quality and need to be improved. The magnification is too low power not allowing looking for histological details.

- Since you were interested in studying the lymphatic tissue why you did not use a lymphatic marker as, for example Lyve-1.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I commend the authors on a well written paper.

The main concern regards the translational nature of experimental data from the animal model to humans. Another question as stated in the discussion section is how much of the lymph transport is affected by schema time since this was not the scope of the paper.

Reviewer #2: In this experimental study, the authors investigate the effect of ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion on lymph nodes, specifically epigastric lymph node flaps, since very little is known about the effect of ischemia on lymphatic tissue. They evaluated rats’ tissue specimens changes through both biochemical and histological methods and concluded that vascularized lymph node flaps that are exposed to 4 hours of ischemia during VLNT will likely undergo irreversible cellular injury that could impair graft function.

Overall, this is an interesting study as it adds a real contribution to the current literature on VLNF that mainly consists of human case series. The presentation is complete for a scientific paper. It is well-written and free of typographical and grammatical errors. The title reflects the content of the paper; the abstract describes the essential information of the work and the introductory section adequately explains the framework and the problems of the research. Figures and tables are clearly presented.

I applaud the authors for the deep biochemical and histological investigation and the good quality of the pictures. Below are my comments:

Materials and methods

- How was the number of rats to be used in the study calculated?

- Who evaluated tissue changes? Was it a blinded or open label evaluation?

- How was the statistical analysis conducted? Which Software was used?

Please provide full information of the tests that have been used to report the results of the study

- Did you test the normal distribution of your population or did you assume it was not normally distributed?

Reviewer #3: - In this manuscript, authors investigate the cellular changes that occur in lymph nodes in response to ischemia and reperfusion. Lymph node containing superficial epigastric artery-based groin flaps were isolated in a Sprague Dawley rat model. Flaps were subjected to ischemia for either 1, 2, 4, or 8 hours, by temporarily occluding the vascular pedicle. Flaps were harvested after 0 hours, 24 hours, or 5 days of reperfusion. They concluded that significant cell death and changes in tissue morphology don’t occur until after 4 hours of ischemia; however, analysis of inflammatory biomarkers suggests that ischemia reperfusion injury can occur with as little as 2 hours of ischemia.

- This article is well written and well thought-out. I applaud the authors for their effort. However, manuscript needs minor revision. Here are my comments and suggestions:

-Regarding Title, authors should add that this study was made in flaps based on the superficial inferior epigastric artery and vein.

- Figure legends should be removed from the manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0227599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227599.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


14 Dec 2019

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Dr Wong,

Thank you for your submission. Please answer to every reviewers comments and make changes to the manuscript your find necessary.

I have few comments?

- the histology figures are not of good quality and need to be improved. The magnification is too low power not allowing looking for histological details.

Upon further investigation, it appears that the figures were compressed during the upload process, resulting in poor quality. We reexported the histology figures using the PACE tool recommended by the PLOS One author guidelines, so that they are of higher resolution. The new figures are attached to this email. The current magnification allowed us to visualize individual cells and thus was used for analysis.

- Since you were interested in studying the lymphatic tissue why you did not use a lymphatic marker as, for example Lyve-1.

We appreciate this very relevant question. To circumvent the need to do confirmatory staining with a marker such as LYVE-1, we utilized Prox-1 eGFP transgenic animals which faithfully express eGFP in lymphatic tissues as previously described by our laboratory in the following publication:

Jung E, Gardner D, Choi D, Park E, Jin Seong Y, Yang S, Castorena-Gonzalez J, Louveau A, Zhou Z, Lee GK, Perrault DP, Lee S, Johnson M, Daghlian G, Lee M, Jin Hong Y, Kato Y, Kipnis J, Davis MJ, Wong AK, Hong YK. Development and Characterization of A Novel Prox1-EGFP Lymphatic and Schlemm's Canal Reporter Rat. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5577.

In the referenced paper, we previously demonstrated concordance between eGFP signal and lymphatic markers such as LYVE-1 and Podoplanin. Since this model has been well established in our lab and published in the peer reviewed literature, further confirmatory immunostaining with markers such as LYVE-1 was not performed.

A benefit of the Prox-1 eGFP rat was that realtime GFP fluorescence was used to precisely identify lymphatic tissue at the time of harvest. To increase the precision and clarity of our methodology, we have added specific statements in the manuscript regarding utilization of the Prox-1 eGFP rat.

Review Comments to the Author

2. At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the source of the rats used in the study

The Prox1-EGFP reporter rats used in this study were developed previously, characterized our laboratory, and described by Jung, E. et. al. [23], Specifically, a Prox1-harboring BAC (RP23-360I16), where the EGFP gene was inserted distal to the mouse Prox1 proximal promoter was used to generate a Sprague-Dawley Prox1-EGFP founder line at Cyagen Biosciences and subsequently expanded at our facility.

(2) Please include the method of euthanasia

Animals were euthanized via carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by a confirmatory double thoracotomy.

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I commend the authors on a well written paper.

The main concern regards the translational nature of experimental data from the animal model to humans. Another question as stated in the discussion section is how much of the lymph transport is affected by schema time since this was not the scope of the paper.

Based on prior published literature, the epigastric flap model upon which the vascularized lymph node flap is based is highly similar to humans from an anatomic standpoint and therefore a suitable platform for translational research. One study investigated the vasculature to the integument covering the ventrolateral abdominal wall in a series of 205 rats. The study revealed that there is a high degree of homology in the anatomy of rats and humans within this region of interest (Casal 2017). The rat model effectively allows for a pedicled flap based on the superior inferior epigastric artery that is ischemic on the distal flap end (Petry 1984). As a result, the model has been used extensively to study ischemia-reperfusion injury, flap necrosis, flap microcirculation, arteriovenous fistula, arterial inflow and venous drainage, and flap prefabrication (Hsu 2018).

With respect to how one might translate information from the ischemia times tested in our experimental model to clinical practice, these experimental data may be used as a reference for clinicians to make independent case specific decisions regarding lymph node flaps that may have sustained long ischemia times. Our data may be used to the guide the decision making process in the clinical setting but we do not suggest that our data be used as absolute clinical criteria for intraoperative management of lymph node flap transfers.

The question regarding how ischemia time affects lymph transport is a good one. However, the process of lymph node flap elevation on a single arterial/venous pedicle requires separating the lymph node unit from afferent and efferent lymphatic vessels thereby making it impossible to perform functional studies that explore the effect of ischemia on lymph transport. It might be possible to assess intranodal function in future studies but this would be outside the scope of the present manuscript.

Reviewer #2: In this experimental study, the authors investigate the effect of ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion on lymph nodes, specifically epigastric lymph node flaps, since very little is known about the effect of ischemia on lymphatic tissue. They evaluated rats’ tissue specimens changes through both biochemical and histological methods and concluded that vascularized lymph node flaps that are exposed to 4 hours of ischemia during VLNT will likely undergo irreversible cellular injury that could impair graft function.

Overall, this is an interesting study as it adds a real contribution to the current literature on VLNF that mainly consists of human case series. The presentation is complete for a scientific paper. It is well-written and free of typographical and grammatical errors. The title reflects the content of the paper; the abstract describes the essential information of the work and the introductory section adequately explains the framework and the problems of the research. Figures and tables are clearly presented.

I applaud the authors for the deep biochemical and histological investigation and the good quality of the pictures. Below are my comments:

Materials and methods

- How was the number of rats to be used in the study calculated?

A pilot study was performed in order to determine the mean number of lymph nodes per groin flap in each rat. Each flap generally contained one large lymph node that was suitable for harvest, and rarely two were found per flap. As flaps were created bilaterally in each animal, two nodes were obtained per rat. Based on a G-power calculation and accounting for 20% mortality rate based on prior experience, n=12 animals were required per group in order to achieve statistical significance.

- Who evaluated tissue changes? Was it a blinded or open label evaluation?

All image analyses were performed by a blinded reviewer. For each analysis, three high-power fields per section were randomly selected and then analyzed by a blinded reviewer.

- How was the statistical analysis conducted? Which Software was used?

- Please provide full information of the tests that have been used to report the results of the study

- Did you test the normal distribution of your population or did you assume it was not normally distributed?

In all graphs, mean 土 standard deviation values are plotted unless otherwise noted. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to determine differences between groups in GraphPad PRISM8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). p-Values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. In order to test for normality, the Anderson-Darling test was performed in GraphPad PRISM8. All graphs and statistical analyses were generated in GraphPad PRISM8.

Reviewer #3: - In this manuscript, authors investigate the cellular changes that occur in lymph nodes in response to ischemia and reperfusion. Lymph node containing superficial epigastric artery-based groin flaps were isolated in a Sprague Dawley rat model. Flaps were subjected to ischemia for either 1, 2, 4, or 8 hours, by temporarily occluding the vascular pedicle. Flaps were harvested after 0 hours, 24 hours, or 5 days of reperfusion. They concluded that significant cell death and changes in tissue morphology don’t occur until after 4 hours of ischemia; however, analysis of inflammatory biomarkers suggests that ischemia reperfusion injury can occur with as little as 2 hours of ischemia.

This article is well written and well thought-out. I applaud the authors for their effort.

However, manuscript needs minor revision. Here are my comments and suggestions:

Regarding Title, authors should add that this study was made in flaps based on the superficial inferior epigastric artery and vein.

The title has been changed to “Ischemia and reperfusion injury in superficial inferior epigastric artery-based vascularized lymph node flaps”.

Figure legends should be removed from the manuscript.

Figure legends have been removed from the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (1).docx

Decision Letter 1

Cesario Bianchi

26 Dec 2019

Ischemia and reperfusion injury in superficial inferior epigastric artery-based vascularized lymph node flaps

PONE-D-19-25885R1

Dear Dr. Wong,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Cesario Bianchi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Dr Wong,

thank you for revising the manuscript that is, at the actual version, acceptable for publication.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Cesario Bianchi

30 Dec 2019

PONE-D-19-25885R1

Ischemia and reperfusion injury in superficial inferior epigastric artery-based vascularized lymph node flaps

Dear Dr. Wong:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Cesario Bianchi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (1).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES