Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jan 10;10:144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56695-2

Genetic Variants Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease in a Spanish Population

Zuray Corredor 1,#, Miguel Inácio da Silva Filho 2,#, Lara Rodríguez-Ribera 1, Antonia Velázquez 1,3, Alba Hernández 1,3, Calogerina Catalano 2, Kari Hemminki 2, Elisabeth Coll 4, Irene Silva 4, Juan Manuel Diaz 4, José Ballarin 4, Martí Vallés Prats 5, Jordi Calabia Martínez 5, Asta Försti 2,✉,#, Ricard Marcos 1,3,✉,#, Susana Pastor 1,3,✉,#
PMCID: PMC6954113  PMID: 31924810

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have many affected physiological pathways. Variations in the genes regulating these pathways might affect the incidence and predisposition to this disease. A total of 722 Spanish adults, including 548 patients and 174 controls, were genotyped to better understand the effects of genetic risk loci on the susceptibility to CKD. We analyzed 38 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes associated with the inflammatory response (interleukins IL-1A, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, ICAM-1), fibrogenesis (TGFB1), homocysteine synthesis (MTHFR), DNA repair (OGG1, MUTYH, XRCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (CYP11B2, AGT), phase-II metabolism (GSTP1, GSTO1, GSTO2), antioxidant capacity (SOD1, SOD2, CAT, GPX1, GPX3, GPX4), and some other genes previously reported to be associated with CKD (GLO1, SLC7A9, SHROOM3, UMOD, VEGFA, MGP, KL). The results showed associations of GPX1, GSTO1, GSTO2, UMOD, and MGP with CKD. Additionally, associations with CKD related pathologies, such as hypertension (GPX4, CYP11B2, ERCC4), cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer predisposition (ERCC2) were also observed. Different genes showed association with biochemical parameters characteristic for CKD, such as creatinine (GPX1, GSTO1, GSTO2, KL, MGP), glomerular filtration rate (GPX1, GSTO1, KL, ICAM-1, MGP), hemoglobin (ERCC2, SHROOM3), resistance index erythropoietin (SOD2, VEGFA, MTHFR, KL), albumin (SOD1, GSTO2, ERCC2, SOD2), phosphorus (IL-4, ERCC4 SOD1, GPX4, GPX1), parathyroid hormone (IL-1A, IL-6, SHROOM3, UMOD, ICAM-1), C-reactive protein (SOD2, TGFB1,GSTP1, XRCC1), and ferritin (SOD2, GSTP1, SLC7A9, GPX4). To our knowledge, this is the second comprehensive study carried out in Spanish patients linking genetic polymorphisms and CKD.

Subject terms: Genetic association study, End-stage renal disease

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is becoming a major public health problem worldwide. CKD is defined as a progressive loss of renal function, measured by a decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)1, which is typically associated with irreversible pathological changes within the kidney. This pathology has a complicated interrelationship with other diseases2,3. Diabetes (DM) and hypertension (HT) are the primary risk factors for CKD4, and CKD is also associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality5,6, even in early stages and in young patients7.

CKD patients are also characterized by a high genomic instability811. This instability could be translated to high levels of genetic damage measured by the incidence of chromosomal damage (micronuclei) when their cells are challenged with ionizing radiation12 and could be either the cause or the consequence of renal pathologies. In addition, it has been observed that CKD patients repair less efficiently DNA damage13.

CKD patients present increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), which is indicative of an inflammatory status12,14,15. Oxidative stress is also a characteristic usually shown by CKD patients1619. Variants in genes regulating such different pathways may affect CKD incidence and/or its progression. In this context recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on large European populations have identified novel genetic risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with different CKD related pathologies like hypertension20, coronary artery disease21, subclinical vascular disease22, and kidney functional traits in CKD patients2325. Other studies have shown an overlap between genetic variants underpinning kidney traits and cardiovascular pathologies25.

Aiming to determine possible associations between allelic variants and susceptibility to CKD, we selected and genotyped 38 SNPs from 31 candidate genes related directly to CKD and to the additional diseases (mainly hypertension, diabetes and inflammation, among others) in a Spanish population.

Results

Population

Table 1 shows some general characteristics of the individuals under study. Among CKD patients there were more men than women, reflecting the well-known higher incidence of CKD in males. As expected, statistically significant differences were observed between cases and controls for different parameters related to the pathology. The differences were highly significant (P < 0.001) for the levels of age, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, albumin, parathyroid hormone, C-reactive protein, uric acid, proteinuria, and urea. The number of samples included in some comparisons is too small to allow definite conclusions. The CKD patients show the main characteristics of the CKD populations as are reflexed in Table 1. The group of patients have more individuals affected by hypertension (91.5% vs a 29% in the control group), and with diabetes mellitus (DM) (32% vs a 7.5% in the control group). Regarding the cardiovascular disease (CVD), it could be said that 45% of the CKD patients presented CVD. Unfortunately, for the control group, we only have 53% of the answers, and of these nobody present CVD,

Table 1.

Description of the study population. Differences in biochemical and clinical parameters of the studied groups are indicated.

Characteristica Controls N = 174 (N) mean ± SD Cases N = 548 (N) mean ± SD
Age (years) (169) 56.06 ± 15.31 (547) 66.34 ± 13.40***
Gender (men/women) 105 (61%)/67 (39%) %0/67 338 (62%)/210 (38%)
Creatinine (45–80 µmol/L)a (169) 69.86 ± 14.36 (184) 200.95 ± 92.92***
Glomerular Filtration Rate (>60 mL/min/1.75 m2) (169) 86.82 ± 6.98 (184) 31.22 ± 13.69***
Erythropoietin/month (µg Darbepoetin/month) ND (400) 207.61 ± 689.91
Erythropoietin Resistance Index (<10) ND (379) 13.50 ± 37.45
Hemoglobin (120–160 g/L) (96) 144.18 ± 11.96 (539) 128.41 ± 18.23***
Glucose (4–5.8 µmol/L) (113) 5.86 ± 1.93 (412) 5.60 ± 1.85*
Cholesterol (3.20–5.20 mmol/L) (86) 5.22 ± 1.04 (542) 4.48 ± 1.16**
Triglycerides (0.30–1.40 mmol/L) (84) 1.34 ± 1.19 (542) 1.50 ± 0.79**
Albumin (37–47 g/L) (66) 44.06 ± 4.28 (405) 40.70 ± 4.52***
Calcium (2.1–2.55 mmol/L) (70) 2.33 ± 0.11 (542) 2.29 ± 0.25
Phosphorus (0.8–1.3 mmol/L) (68) 1.07 ± 0.14 (542) 1.30 ± 0.40**
Parathyroid hormone (7–53 ng/L) (25) 61.23 ± 23.58 (401) 190.19 ± 179.09***
Ferritin (25–250 µg/L) (3) 88.56 ± 49.32 (325) 245.87 ± 257.66
C-Reactive Protein (<10 mg/L) (13) 2.80 ± 3.21 (362) 10.16 ± 19.40*
Uric acid (210–420 µmol/L) (98) 302.54 ± 85.50 (286) 385.80 ± 109.60***
Proteinuria/24 h (<0.15 g/L) (116) 0.14 ± 0.73 (165) 0.81 ± 1.43***
Urea (2.5–7 Mmol/L) (56) 5.67 ± 1.63 (179) 15.32 ± 6.88***
Hba1c glycosylated hemoglobin (<5.7%) (10) 5.18 ± 2.43 (158) 4.80 ± 1.62
Fibrinogen (2–4 µmol/L) (2) 4.35 ± 1.11 (91) 4.47 ± 0.98
Hypertension (yes/no) 27 (29%)/66 (71%) 498 (91.5%)/46 (8.5%)***
Diabetes Mellitus (yes/no) 7 (7.5%)/86 (92.5%) 174 (32%)/370 (68%)***

Mann-Whitney test; cases vs controls; ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. ND: no data. anormal values are shown in parentheses.

The slight differences in the numbers of patients reported for different parameters are due to their absence in the questionnaires, or to failure in the corresponding analysis.

SNPs associated with CKD

General information about the 38 SNPs included in the study, with their allelic frequencies and their location in the genome is described in Table 2. As indicated, we used alternative SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the selected one, when no assay corresponding to the originally selected SNP was available.

Table 2.

Description of the SNPs selected for this study.

Function group Gene SNP original SNP alternative LD (r2) Chr Position (NCBI dbSNP GRCh38) Consequence of the original SNP* Minor allele Major allele Minor allele frequency (NCBI dbSNP)
GLO1 rs386572987 rs4746 1.00 6 38682852 missensea Glu111Ala G T 0.2873
Associated with CKD SLC7A9 rs12460876 19 32865985 intron variant C T 0.4235
SHROOM3 rs17319721 4 76447694 intron variant A G 0.2238
UMOD rs12917707 16 20356368 66 bp 5′ of UMOD T G 0.0982
VEGFA rs881858 6 43838872 13 kb 3′ of RP11–344J7.2 G A 0.3626
IL-1A rs1800587 rs17561 0.99 2 112779646 5′-UTR A C 0.2175
Cytokinesc IL-4 rs2243250 rs2070874 0.99 5 132674018 2KB 5′IL-4 a T C 0.4012
IL-6 rs1800795 rs1800797 0.97 7 22726602 intron variant A G 0.1382
IL-10 rs1800896 1 206773552 1.1 kb 5′ of IL10 C T 0.2722
TNF-α rs1800629 6 31575254 312 bp 5′ of TNF A G 0.0903
ICAM-1 rs5498 19 10285007 missense Glu469lys G A 0.3588
Renin-angiotensin-aldosteronec CYP11B2 rs1799998 8 142918184 340 bp 5′ of CYP11B2 G A 0.3472
AGT rs5050 1 230714140 5′ UTR G T 0.1759
Fibrogenesisc TGFB1 rs1800470 19 41353016 Missense Pro10Leu G A 0.4547
rs1800468 19 41354682 3′UTR T C 0.0413
rs1800469 19 41354391 intron variant A G 0.368
Homocysteine synthesis MTHFR rs1801133 1 11796321 missense T C 0.2454
Antioxidant enzymes SOD1 rs17880135 21 31669690 758 bp 3′ of SOD1 G T 0.0276
SOD1 rs1041740 21 31667849 intron variant T C 0.2428
SOD1 rs202446 21 31656328 intron varianta T G 0.0755
SOD2 rs4880 6 159692840 missense Val16Ala G A 0.4107
CAT rs1001179 11 34438684 240 bp 5′ of CAT T C 0.1256
GPX1 rs1050450 rs17080528 0.98 3 49352409 Downstream gene variantb T C 0.2175
GPX3 rs870406 5 151021040 intron variant A G 0.0974
GPX4 rs713041 19 1106616 synonymous T C 0.401
NER ERCC2 (XPD) rs1799793 19 45364001 Missense Asp312Asn T C 0.1945
ERCC2 rs171140 19 45361744 intron variant C A 0.367
ERCC2 rs13181 19 45351661 missense 500pb 3′ of ERCC2 G T 0.2366
ERCC4 rs3136166 16 13938236 intron variant G T 0.4249
BER OGG1 rs1052133 3 9757089 missense Ser326Cys G C 0.3021
MUTYH rs3219489 1 45331833 missense Gln338His G C 0.3135
XRCC1 rs25487 19 43551574 missense Gln399Arg T C 0.2604
Phase-II metabolism GSTP1 rs1695 rs749174 0.92 11 67585782 missense Ile105Val A G 0.2438
GSTO1 rs4925 rs2164624 0.93 10 104253687 intron variantb A G 0.1879
GSTO2 rs156697 10 104279427 missense Asn142Asp G A 0.4407
Genes related with mortality in hemolyzed s MGP rs4236 12 14882147 missense Thr83Ala C T 0.3854
KL rs1207568 13 33016046 22 bp 5′ of KL A G 0.1601
patients KL rs577912 13 33036014 intron variant T G 0.1953

Chr. chromosome; *according to Haploreg; LD linkage disequilibrium; ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. bhttp://www.ensembl.org/index.html; crelated to pathological process characteristic of chronic kidney disease.

Table 3 shows the observed associations (P < 0.05) between the candidate SNPs and CKD susceptibility in the entire study population. When the analysis was adjusted for age and gender, three SNPs showed an association under the dominant model. These SNPs were rs17080528 in the GPX1 gene, that encodes one of the most important antioxidant enzymes in humans (OR = 1.87, P = 0.001) and rs2164624 and rs156697 in the GSTO1 and GSTO2 genes, both involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics and carcinogens (OR = 0.50, P = 0.0007, and OR = 0.57, P = 0.013, respectively). For the SNPs rs12917707 in UMOD, that acts as a constitutive inhibitor of calcium crystallization in renal fluids, and rs4236 in MGP, which encodes a protein acting as an inhibitor of bone formation, the associations were identified under an additive inheritance model (allelic OR = 0.72, P = 0.043 and allelic OR = 0.75, P = 0.023, respectively).

Table 3.

Positive associations found between candidate SNPs and chronic kidney disease (CKD) susceptibility.

Gene Without co-variables Adjusted for age and sex
SNP Geno-type Affec-ted Un- affected OR 95%CI P OR 95% CI P
GPX1 rs17080528 CC 211 89 1.00
CT 246 60 1.73 1.19–2.52 0.004 1.91 1.28–2.84 0.002
TT 58 15 1.63 0.88–3.03 0.122 1.71 0.89–3.28 0.106
T 1.44 1.09–1.91 0.010 1.52 1.13–2.04 0.005
CT + TT 304 75 1.71 1.2–2.44 0.003 1.87 1.28–2.72 0.001
GSTO1 rs2164624 GG 215 45 1.00
GA 241 98 0.51 0.35–0.77 0.001 0.48 0.31–0.73 0.0005
AA 71 25 0.59 0.34–1.04 0.067 0.58 0.32–1.05 0.071
A 0.72 0.55–0.92 0.010 0.70 0.53–0.91 0.008
GA + AA 312 123 0.53 0.36–0.78 0.001 0.50 0.33–0.75 0.0007
GSTO2 rs156697 AA 173 35 1.00
AG 254 89 0.58 0.37–0.89 0.014 0.60 0.38–0.96 0.031
GG 80 33 0.49 0.28–0.85 0.010 0.49 0.28–0.87 0.015
G 0.69 0.53–0.90 0.006 0.70 0.53–0.91 0.008
AG + GG 334 122 0.55 0.36–0.84 0.006 0.57 0.37–0.89 0.013
UMOD rs12917707 GG 335 92 1.00
GT 156 50 0.86 0.58–1.27 0.441 0.82 0.54–1.24 0.344
TT 15 12 0.34 0.16–0.76 0.008 0.39 0.17–0.90 0.027
T 0.71 0.53–0.97 0.031 0.72 0.52–0.99 0.043
GT + TT 171 62 0.76 0.52–1.10 0.142 0.74 0.50–1.09 0.13
MGP rs4236 CC 225 63 1.00
CT 179 55 0.91 0.60–1.36 0.658 0.81 0.52–1.25 0.340
TT 84 37 0.64 0.39–1.02 0.063 0.55 0.33–0.91 0.020
T 0.81 0.64–1.03 0.08 0.75 0.58–0.96 0.023
CT + TT 263 92 0.80 0.55–1.16 0.234 0.70 0.48–1.04 0.08

Case-control analysis, OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

SNPs associated with related pathologies

It is known that patients with CKD have at the same time other diseases, which are related to the presence of renal failure, either as a cause or as a consequence. Among them we can indicate hypertension (HT), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and diabetes mellitus (DM) and, in some cases a medical history of cancer. In our study we observed a high incidence of HT (91.5%), CVD (45.2%), DM (32%), and previous cancer (30%) in patients with CKD.

When the associations between candidate SNPs and pathologies related to CKD were considered, some associations were observed (Table 4). For HT, two genes, GPX4, implicated in the protection of cells against oxidative damage, and CYP11B2, with the encoded enzyme catalyzing many reactions involved in drug metabolism and synthesis of cholesterol, steroids, and other lipids, showed an association in the dominant model. ERCC4, involved in nucleotide excision repair pathway, showed association in the additive model. With regard to previous cancer history, the ERCC2 gene, also involved in nucleotide excision repair, showed an association under allelic model (rs13181, rs713041) and dominant model (rs1052133). For CVD we observed an association in the dominant model with the ERCC2 gene.

Table 4.

Positive associations observed between candidate SNPs and pathologies related to chronic kidney disease (CKD), case-only analysis.

Pathology Gene SNP Genotype No pathology§ With pathology$ OR# 95% CI# P#
Hypertension GPX4 rs713041* TT 8 190 1.00
TC 14 128 0.39 0.16–0.96 0.040
CC 15 85 0.24 0.10–0.58 0.002
C 0.50 0.32–0.76 0.001
TC + CC 29 213 0.31 0.14–0.70 0.005
CYP11B2 rs1799998 AA 22 138 1.00
AG 18 228 2.01 1.04–3.89 0.039
GG 5 105 3.63 1.23–9.20 0.018
G 1.89 1.19–3.00 0.007
AG + GG 23 333 2.30 1.24–4.28 0.008
ERCC4 rs3136166 TT 13 200 1.00
TG 21 220 0.67 0.33–1.38 0.281
GG 10 46 0.29 0.12–0.71 0.007
G 0.55 0.35–0.88 0.011
TG + GG 31 266 0.55 0.28–1.08 0.083
Previous cancer ERCC2 rs13181 TT 114 61 1.00
TG 124 55 0.84 0.53–1.32 0.444
GG 39 6 0.29 0.11–0.72 0.008
G 0.66 0.47–0.92 0.016
TG + GG 163 61 0.70 0.45–1.09 0.116
ERCC2 rs713041* TT 104 40 1.00
TC 83 34 1.17 0.67–2.03 0.584
CC 48 33 1.87 1.03–3.37 0.038
C 1.35 1.01–1.82 0.046
TC + CC 131 67 1.43 0.88–2.32 0.146
ERCC2 rs1052133 CC 175 65 1.00
CG 87 54 1.73 1.10–2.72 0.019
GG 16 3 0.63 0.17–2.28 0.481
G 1.29 0.89–1.87 0.179
CG + GG 103 57 0.58 1.01–2.46 0.044
Cardiovascular disease ERCC2 rs1799793 TT 144 107 1.00
TC 90 109 1.71 1.15–2.54 0.008
CC 26 23 1.16 0.61–2.21 0.644
C 1.28 0.96–1.69 0.088
TC + CC 116 132 1.58 1.09–2.29 0.016

Case-case analysis, OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

#ORs and the corresponding 95% CIs were adjusted for age and gender.

$The number of genotypes may differ due to missing clinical data and/or genotypes; overall the genotype call rate was over 0.92.

*Genotype call rate for rs713041 was 0.81; both among individuals with and without the pathology.

SNPs associated with clinical/biochemical parameters

CKD patients are characterized by a defined biochemical profile acting as a clinical indicator. To detect associations between the selected SNPs and clinical parameters the main analyses were done in a combined case-control population, using both logistic and linear regression models with the median or normal value as a cut-off, considering normal values according to the international system. They are used by the Puigvert Foundation, as standard protocols, and can be seen in Supplementary Table S1 for each of the selected clinical parameters. Case-only analysis to verify the associations was done using only linear regression model. The obtained results are shown in Table S1. As indicated, nine biochemical parameters showed any kind of statistical association with defined genes: creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, erythropoietin resistance index, albumin, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, C-reactive protein, and ferritin.

Genetic variants codifying for antioxidant enzymes were associated with the levels of creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, erythropoietin resistance index, albumin and phosphorus levels, C-reactive protein, and ferritin levels (rs17080528 from GPX1 gene, rs713041 from GPX4, rs4880 from SOD2 gene, rs17880135, rs202446, rs1041740 from SOD1 gene). Other genetic variants coding for phase II metabolism enzymes, were also associated with the levels of creatinine, GFR, albumin, C-reactive protein and ferritin (rs2164624 from GSTO1 gene, rs156697 from GSTO2 gene, rs749174 from GSTP1 gene). Genetic variants of genes involved in DNA repair were strongly associated with hemoglobin and albumin levels (rs171140 from ERCC2 gene) and showed borderline associations with the levels of the C-reactive protein (rs25487 for XRCC1) and phosphorus (rs3136166 from ERCC4 gene). Other variants associated with renal pathology itself showed a significant relationship with the levels of creatinine, GFR, and hemoglobin, as well as RIE, PTH and C-reactive protein (rs577912, rs1207568 from KL gene, rs4236 from MGP gene, rs17319721 from SHROOM3 gene, rs881858 from VEGFA gene, rs12917707 from UMOD gene, and rs12460876 from SLC7A9 gene).

Some genes related to the immune response showed a moderate association with the GFR, phosphorus and PTH levels (rs5498 from the ICAM-1 gene, rs2070874 from IL-4 gene, rs17561 from IL-1A gene, and rs1800797 from the IL-6 gene). In addition, a variant in the gene MTHFR, related to the homocysteine synthesis, showed a moderate association with the RIE.

Replication in the case-only setting supported the associations of the combined case-control analysis, with reduced significance for parameters, for which the cases and controls showed clearly distinct patterns, such as creatinine and glomerular filtration rate. For those parameters, a few additional associations appeared, however, with genes among the same group of antioxidant enzymes (SOD1 rs1041740) and renal pathology (KL rs1204568, VEGFA rs881858) as in the combined analysis. Also for hemoglobin, two additional variants belonging to the DNA repair pathway emerged (ERCC2 rs1799793, ERCC4 rs3136166). For other parameters, such as erythropoietin resistance index, albumin, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, C-reactive protein and ferritin, the associations were similar, or even stronger than in the combined analysis, due to the fact that clinical data were available mostly for cases.

Discussion

This study succeeded to demonstrate associations between five SNPs and CKD in the list of 38 SNPs selected in the 31 candidate genes. Genes showing associations were GPX1, GSTO1, GSTO2, UMOD, and MGP.

GPX1 is the major isoform of GPX that is expressed in the normal kidney; this accounts for 96% of kidney GPX activity and shows a protective role against oxidative stress26. Pro198Leu and Pro197Leu variants (strongly associated with our variant, LD r2 = 0.98) have been reported to be associated with reduction of GPX1 activity27, and it has been suggested that GPX1 is a possible candidate gene for CVD risk28 that, as previously indicated, is a pathology strongly linked to CKD.

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are detoxification enzymes playing an important role in the conjugation of endogenous or exogenous xenobiotic toxins to glutathione (GSH). The family of cytosolic GSTs has different classes, including the Omega (GSTO) class29. Polymorphisms in GSTO1 and GSTO2, members of the Omega class, might influence the level of oxidative stress30. GSTO1 (rs4925) and GSTO2 (rs156697) genotypes have been associated with worse prognosis and shorter survival in bladder cancer patients31.

The UMOD gene encodes for uromodulin protein acting as a constitutive inhibitor of calcium crystallization in renal fluids32. The SNP rs12917707 was found to be associated with both glomerular filtration rate and better kidney function in two GWASs33,34. Seven SNPs of the UMOD gene that are in high LD with rs12917707 were also associated with CKD at a genome-wide significant level35 and, in general, many studies independently corroborate earlier evidence for the association between UMOD and CKD36.

The MGP gene encodes a protein acting as an inhibitor of bone formation. The rs4236 variant results in a missense mutation influencing the calcification process and affecting atherosclerotic plaques37. It is also known that the variant form is associated with a decreased quantity of coronary artery calcification38. In this context, our results are consistent with those reported in the literature showing a protective effect with respect to CKD39. A recent publication on the Spanish Nefrona Cohort also found the association of the rs4236 SNP of the MGP gene with CKD40.

Different pathologies like hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cancer are strongly linked with CKD. Although in our study none of the genes associated with CKD were associated with these pathologies, positive associations with other candidate SNPs and genes were observed. GPX4, CYP11B2, and ERCC4 genes were associated with hypertension. The phospholipid hydroperoxide GPX (GPX4) is a common intracellular selenoprotein that reduces lipid hydroperoxides and regulates leukotriene biosynthesis and cytokine signaling pathways. The SNP rs713041 causes a C to T substitution in a region of the GPX4 gene corresponding to the 3´-untranslated region of the messenger RNA altering protein binding41. Although no association was observed in a Japanese CKD population42, a direct relationship between the rate of change of plasma GPX activity and the rate of change of glomerular filtration index was observed43. The CYP11B2 gene, which encodes the human aldosterone synthase, is a cytochrome P450 enzyme that catalyzes the terminal steps of aldosterone synthesis in the zona glomerulosa cells of the adrenal cortex44. The rs1799998 polymorphism has been suggested to be associated with genetic predisposition to cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction and hypertension45. Our study agrees with those researches revealing an association with increased risk of hypertension among CKD patients46. Finally, ERCC4 is involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, with a reported association with cancer47. This is a new finding, as no previous report found associations between this SNP and kidney diseases or hypertension.

With regard to previous cancer history and cardiovascular disease, an association with ERCC2 was observed. ERCC2 is an important DNA repair gene in the NER pathway that has been associated with cancer incidence48, and with cardiovascular disease49 but no previous reports linked this gene with kidney failure in humans. Nevertheless, ERCC has shown to be associated with age-related vascular dysfunction in a mouse model50. Interestingly in our study, this gene was associated with both CVD and with a previous cancer history among CKD patients.

Since CKD is characterized by changes in clinical parameters, which in our case are continuous values, both a linear and a logistic regression model, with either the median or the normal value as a cut-off were carried out. Several associations between clinical parameters and selected SNPs were observed as indicated in Table S1. All genes showing association with CKD showed also at least one association with the evaluated clinical parameters. GPX1, GSTO, KL, and MGP genes showed associations with the creatinine levels and with the glomerular filtration rate, which are strongly linked to CKD. In addition, GPX1 and GPX4 genes were also associated with phosphorus levels, GPX4 with ferritin levels, GSTO with albumin levels, and KL with the resistance index to erythropoietin. The UMOD gene was associated with the levels of parathyroid hormone.

In consonance with the large importance of cytokines in inflammatory diseases and considering that inflammation is closely related to mineral disorders in CKD51,52 we found an association between IL-4 gene and phosphorus levels. We also identified an association between IL1A, IL-6, and ICAM-1 genes and parathyroid hormone (PTH) values; and ICAM-1 gene also with the glomerular filtration rate. Previous investigations demonstrated the effect of IL-6, IL-4, and ICAM polymorphisms in end-stage renal disease patients53. Interestingly, both cytokines (IL1A and IL-6) have been implicated as key factors linking malnutrition, accelerated atherogenesis, and excessive morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in hemodialysis54. In addition, IL-4 was also associated with phosphorus levels. The same polymorphisms we evaluated for IL-4 and IL-6 genes were also associated with kidney function and CKD prevalence in a large Japanese population55 where IL-4 was found to be associated with glomerulonephritis56, and increased levels of phosphorus as well as parathyroid cell proliferation57, that would support our findings. Surprisingly, there was a lack of association among SNPs of IL-1 and IL-6 and CRP, giving the well-known relationship between CRP and inflammation. It would be interesting to analyze the possible association of these SNPs with the neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio, which are considered prognostic markers associated with inflammation in many diseases including CKD, but unfortunately this information was not available.

With regard to the selected antioxidant genes, in addition of the role of GPX, SOD genes were also associated with biomarkers such as erythropoietin resistance index, albumin and phosphorus levels, C-reactive protein and ferritin levels. These associations agree with a previous study58, supporting the role of oxidative stress in the progression of several diseases, including CKD. Our findings also agree with previous researches showing that SOD was associated with advanced nephropathy59.

Three of the genes involved in DNA repair, ERCC2, ERCC4, and XRCC1 were associated with different clinical parameters. ERCC2 was associated with albumin and hemoglobin levels, ERCC4 with phosphorus levels, while XRCC1 was associated with C-reactive protein values. ERCC genes are involved in DNA repair, in particular in the nucleotide excision repair pathway, and different SNPs have been associated with kidney pathologies such as renal cell carcinoma60. In fact, ERCC1 and ERCC4 play important roles in the development of nephropathies, as demonstrated in mammalian models61. The variant rs25487 of the XRCC1 gene confers increased risk for the development of ESRD62,63.

In our study, the GSTP1 gene was associated with C-reactive protein and ferritin levels. This gene is involved in a wide range of detoxification reactions that protect cells from carcinogens64. GSTs provide protection against reactive oxygen species and the electrophilic metabolites of carcinogens. Interestingly the role of GSTP1 (together with GSTA1, GSTM1, and GSTT) genotypes was already determined in a group of end-stage renal disease patients showing that those individuals carrying the null alleles showed increased susceptibility towards oxidative and carbonyl stress65. The Klotho (KL) gene encodes the klotho protein controlling multiple ion channels and growth factor signaling pathways, including insulin, IGF-1, and Wnt signaling.

The Klotho gene was associated with high creatinine levels, glomerular filtration rate, and erythropoietin resistance index. KL expression in kidneys was reduced in patients with chronic renal failure66, which would imply that the reduction of KL protein may be relevant in the pathophysiology of kidney disease. Our results would agree with those indicating a role in the increased risk observed in different pathologies associated with CKD67.

SHROOM3, VEGFA, UMOD, and SLC7A9, were associated with hemoglobin and parathyroid hormone levels, with erythropoietin resistance index, with parathyroid hormone levels, and with ferritin values, respectively. Interestingly these four genes were previously associated with CKD in GWAS studies23,6870. SHROOM3 encodes an actin-binding protein expressed in the kidney, where it may have an important role in the morphogenesis of epithelial tissues during development71. VEGFA encodes vascular endothelial growth factor A, and some variants have been identified related to nephrogenesis23. UMOD encodes uromodulin which is the most abundant protein in normal urine72 having antimicrobial properties providing defense against uropathogens responsible for urinary tract infections; in addition, it may also play a role in preventing crystallization of calcium and uric acid in kidneys and urine73. The SLC7A9 gene encodes the neutral and basic amino acid transport protein (rBAT) involved in the transport of the urinary dibasic amino acids across the renal tubular membrane74. In spite of their importance in kidney physiology, we did not find association between these genes and CKD; nevertheless, we were able to detect their modulatory role on some of the biochemical parameters that are characteristics of CKD patients. A possible explanation for the lack of association of these SNPs with CKD could be the small sample size of the control group.

MTHFR, a folate-dependent enzyme, plays an important role in the conversion of homocysteine to methionine, being important for most of the biological processes. The variant rs1801133 of the MTHFR gene is relatively common and it has been studied for a long time. There is a wide list of disorders in different populations around the world affected by this SNP, and MTHFR variants are associated with susceptibility of type 2 diabetes mellitus in diabetic nephropathy75. Our results showed an association between the MTHFR variant and the resistance index to the erythropoietin. Different studies show that ESRD patients homozygous for the mutant allele rs1801133 have increased mortality risk76, and associations of the MTHFR gene with CKD progression have also been reported77,78.

A detailed discussion of the pros and cons of SNP association studies in the clinical context of CKD is outside the scope of this article, and a large number of comparisons tested may hinder the clarity of the results. Many of these studies rely on small samples, often being limited by the logistics of clinical study designs. Therefore, the ratio of the number of variables to the number of individuals/observations grows even higher, placing additional constraints on the analysis methods. An additional difficulty here lies in incorporating different data types (e.g., SNPs from different kinds of genes and metabolite measurements from metabolomics studies) into the same analysis framework, which is something that the traditional analysis using parametric statistical methods are not particularly efficient at either. Thus, small numbers of patients in some analysis, multiple variables analyzed, with possible correlation between them, are perhaps the most difficult challenge, required in this study, to associate complex variants with the CKD.

The overall conclusion of this study is that variants in GPX1, GSTO1, GSTO2, UMOD, and MGP genes are associated with CKD. In addition, other genes were found to be associated with CKD related pathologies, such as hypertension (GPX4, CYP11B2, ERCC4), cancer predisposition (ERCC2), and cardiovascular disease (ERCC2). Finally, associations with classical CKD biochemical parameters were found for creatinine (GPX1, GSTO1, GSTO2, KL, MGP), glomerular filtration rate (GPX1, GSTO1, KL, ICAM-1, MGP), hemoglobin (ERCC2, SHROOM3), resistance index erythropoietin (SOD2, VEGFA, MTHFR, KL), albumin (SOD1, SOD2, GSTO2, ERCC2), phosphorus (IL-4, ERCC4, SOD1, GPX1, GPX4) parathyroid hormone (IL-1A, IL6, SHROOM3, UMOD, ICAM-1), C-reactive protein (SOD2, GSTP1, XRCC1), and ferritin (SOD2, GSTP1, SLC7A9, GPX4).

Methods

Ethics statement

All individuals participating in the study provided written informed consent, and blood samples were collected under protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of the Puigvert Foundation from Barcelona and Josep Trueta Hospital from Girona, in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. In addition to the genotyping studies, peripheral blood samples were also used to determine standard biochemical parameters relevant for CKD.

Study populations

The study involved a total of 722 European-Spanish adults, including 548 patients suffering kidney pathologies at different stages, and 174 controls. All patients had a reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). In total, we had 338 men and 210 women (62% and 38%, respectively) as CKD patients. Healthy controls were 105 men and 67 women (61% and 39%, respectively).

General characteristics of all patients are shown in Table 1. In addition to the 133 patients recruited from the hospital J. Trueta (Girona), 415 patients and all controls were randomly recruited at the Puigvert Foundation, Barcelona, over a period of 7 years. Controls were selected from the urology clinic outpatients suffering from either prostatic pathology, urinary tract infections or kidney stones, and all had normal GFR, according to their ages. All controls and 415 patients belong to our previous work19.

Gene and SNP selection, and genotyping

Gene and SNP selection. A total of 38 SNPs from 31 candidate genes were selected. Some of them were previously reported in a GWAS to be associated with CKD (GLO1, SLC7A9, SHROOM3, UMOD, and VEGFA)23,33,35,79, other were related to pathological processes characteristic of CKD, such as cytokines (IL-1A, IL-4, IL-6, IL10, TNF-a and ICAM-1), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (AGT and CYP11B2), proteins involved in fibrogenesis (TGFB1), and in homocysteine synthesis (MTHFR). Some genes coding for antioxidant enzymes were also included (SOD1, SOD2, CAT, GPX1, GPX3, and GPX4). Moreover, genes involved in DNA repair pathways such as nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes (ERCC2, and ERCC4) and base excision repair (BER) genes (OGG1, MUTYH, XRCC1), and phase-II metabolism (GSTP1, GSTO1, and GSTO2) were included. Finally, other genes related to mortality in hemodialysis patients, vascular calcification and aging (KL and MGP)80,81 were also incorporated into the study. The gene and SNP selection were based on published studies reporting associations of SNPs with CKD, or related phenotypes, and all selected SNPs had a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 10%. Table 2 shows details of the SNPs studied in our population. When no genotyping assay was available for the selected SNP another SNP in high linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.8) was genotyped instead (alternative SNPs in Table 2).

Genotyping was carried out using the TaqMan SNP genotyping assays (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. To assure the genotyping reliability, repeated analysis was performed in a randomly selected 10% of samples (quality controls); no discrepancies between the genotypes were observed. KASP allelic discrimination method (LGCgenomics, Middelsex, UK) was used to genotype the SNPs rs1800896, rs1800470, rs1799793, and rs1207568. DNA amplification was performed according to the LGC genomics’ PCR conditions. Genotype detection for all SNPs was performed using a ViiA™ 7 v1.2.1 (Applied Biosystems) and allelic discrimination was performed with 95% confidence. Further information can be found in the PhD of the first author82.

Statistical analysis

For the comparison of means of the different clinical parameters, between cases and controls, the Mann Whitney test was used. For the analysis of the pathologies associated with CKD, the Fisher test was performed.

In the association study, samples with <50% call rate were excluded. The observed genotype frequencies in controls were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the Chi-square test. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for associations between genotypes and CKD, associated phenotypes and clinical parameters converted to binary variables were estimated by logistic regression while linear regression was used for continuous variables. The analyses were done considering two models, one without adjustment and a second adjusting for age and gender. Statistical significance was determined by a P-value lower than 0.05. The analyses were performed using the following statistical software: the Statistic Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) software for Windows version 19.0, PLINK 1.90, https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink283 and Rx64 3.1.3 for82 Windows, http://www.r-project.org.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

First of all we thank all the volunteers that have participated in this study. We are grateful to Dr. Andrea Woltmann for supervising the genotyping. Corredor Z. and Rodríguez-Ribera L. were supported by COLCIENCIAS (Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia) and by a postgraduate fellowship (PIF) from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, respectively. The research group belongs to a consolidated Research Group (AGAUR 2009/SGR-1116) and to REDINREN (Spanish Renal Network for Research 16/06 RETICS, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III). The results presented in this article have been included, in part, in the Doctoral Thesis of the first author (Z. Corredor). This Thesis can be consulted in the open repository of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. This investigation has been supported in part by a grant from Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS, PI12/02559).

Author contributions

S.P., R.M. and A.F. planned the experiments. Z.C., L.R.-R., A.V. and A.H. prepared DNA samples. I.S., J.M.D., J.B., E.C., M.V.P. and J.C.M. supplied all biological samples and information about patients. Z.C., M.I.S.F.,. and C.C., carried out the genotyping, statistical analysis and interpretation of data. S.P., R.M. and A.F. draft the manuscript. S.P., R.M., K.H. and A.F. carried out a critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Zuray Corredor, Miguel Inácio da Silva Filho, Asta Försti, Ricard Marcos and Susana Pastor.

Contributor Information

Asta Försti, Email: A.Foersti@dkfz-heidelberg.de.

Ricard Marcos, Email: ricard.marcos@uab.es.

Susana Pastor, Email: susana.pastor@uab.es.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-56695-2.

References

  • 1.Smyth LJ, et al. Genetic and epigenetic factors influencing chronic kidney disease. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2014;307:757–776. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00306.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tonelli M, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation and progression of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005;68:237–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Snively CS. Chronic kidney disease: prevention and treatment of common complications. Am. Fam. Physician. 2014;70:1921–1928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adler AI, et al. Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64) Kidney Int. 2003;63:225–232. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00712.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meguid El Nahas A, et al. Chronic kidney disease: the global challenge. Lancet. 2005;365:331–340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17789-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Levey AS, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives -a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Kidney Int. 2007;72:247–259. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.London GM. Cardiovascular disease in chronic renal failure: pathophysiologic aspects. Semin. Dial. 2003;16:85–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-139X.2003.16023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sandoval SB, et al. Genomic instability in chronic renal failure patients. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2012;53:343–349. doi: 10.1002/em.21694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sandoval SB, et al. Genetic damage in chronic renal failure patients is associated with the glomerular filtration rate index. Mutagenesis. 2010;25:603–608. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geq047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lialiaris T, et al. Chromosome instability in patients with chronic renal failure. Genet. Test Mol. Biomarkers. 2010;14:37–41. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2009.0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moffitt T. Oxidative DNA damage is elevated in renal patients undergoing haemodialysis. Open J. Prev. Med. 2014;4:421–429. doi: 10.4236/ojpm.2014.46049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodríguez-Ribera L, et al. Radiosensitivity in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease. In. J. Radiat. Biol. 2015;91:172–178. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2015.959670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stoyanova E, et al. Base excision repair capacity in chronic renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2014;32:177–182. doi: 10.1002/cbf.2989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vidt DG. Inflammation in renal disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006;97:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dungey M, Hull KL, Smith AC, Burton JO, Bishop NC. Inflammatory factors and exercise in chronic kidney disease. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013;2013:569831. doi: 10.1155/2013/569831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Spittle MA, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation in hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 2001;38:1408–1413. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.29280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morena M, et al. Oxidative stress in hemodialysis patients: is NADPH oxidase complex the culprit? Kidney Int. 2002;Suppl. 80:109–114. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.61.s80.20.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sung CC, Hsu YC, Chen CC, Lin YF, Wu CC. Oxidative stress and nucleic acid oxidation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2013;2013:301982. doi: 10.1155/2013/301982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Corredor Z, et al. Genomic damage as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease status. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2015;56:301–312. doi: 10.1002/em.21911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ehret GB, et al. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011;478:103–109. doi: 10.1038/nature10405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schunkert H, et al. Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nature Genet. 2011;43:333–338. doi: 10.1038/ng.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bis JC, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from the CHARGE consortium identifies common variants associated with carotid intima media thickness and plaque. Nature Genet. 2011;43:940–947. doi: 10.1038/ng.920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Köttgen A, et al. New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease. Nature Genet. 2010;42:376–384. doi: 10.1038/ng.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ellis JW, et al. Validated SNPs for eGFR and their associations with albuminuria. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21:3293–3298. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Olden M, et al. Overlap between common genetic polymorphisms underpinning kidney traits and cardiovascular disease phenotypes: the CKDGen consortium. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2013;61:889–898. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.De Haan JB, et al. Mice with a homozygous null mutation for the most abundant glutathione peroxidase, Gpx1, show increased susceptibility to the oxidative stress-inducing agents paraquat and hydrogen peroxide. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:22528–22536. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.35.22528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takata Y, et al. Genetic variation in GPX1 is associated with GPX1 activity in a comprehensive analysis of genetic variations in selenoenzyme genes and their activity and oxidative stress in humans. J. Nutr. 2012;142:419–426. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.151845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang JX, et al. Association of glutathione peroxidase-1 (GPx-1) rs1050450 Pro198Leu and Pro197Leu polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2014;11:141–150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hayes JD, Flanagan JU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005;45:51–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Whitbread AK, et al. Characterization of the omega class of glutathione transferases. Methods Enzymol. 2005;401:78–99. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)01005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Djukic TI, et al. Glutathione S-transferase T1, O1 and O2 polymorphisms are associated with survival in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:e74724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rampoldi L, Scolari F, Amoroso A, Ghiggeri G, Devuyst O. The rediscovery of uromodulin (Tamm-Horsfall protein): from tubulointerstitial nephropathy to chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2011;80:338–347. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Köttgen A, et al. Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease. Nature Genet. 2009;41:712–717. doi: 10.1038/ng.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gorski M, et al. Genome-wide association study of kidney function decline in individuals of European descent. Kidney Int. 2015;87:1017–1029. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Köttgen A. Genome-wide association studies in nephrology research. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2010;56:743–758. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reznichenko A, et al. UMOD as a susceptibility gene for end-stage renal disease. BMC Med. Genet. 2012;13:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Herrmann SM, et al. Polymorphisms of the human matrix gla protein (MGP) gene, vascular calcification, and myocardial infarction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000;20:2386–2393. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.20.11.2386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Crosier MD, et al. Matrix Gla protein polymorphisms are associated with coronary artery calcification in men. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 2009;55:59–65. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.55.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Arcidiacono T, et al. Idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a review of pathogenic mechanisms in the light of genetic studies. Am. J. Nephrol. 2014;40:499–506. doi: 10.1159/000369833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Valls J, et al. Association of candidate gene polymorphisms with chronic kidney disease: results of a case-control analysis in the Nefrona Cohort. Front. Genet. 2019;10:118. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bermano G, et al. Evidence that a polymorphism within the 3′UTR of glutathione peroxidase 4 is functional and is associated with susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Genes Nutr. 2007;2:225–232. doi: 10.1007/s12263-007-0052-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hishida A, et al. Polymorphisms in genes encoding antioxidant enzymes (SOD2, CAT, GPx, TXNRD, SEPP1, SEP15 and SELS) and risk of chronic kidney disease in Japanese - cross-sectional data from the J-MICC study. J. Clin. Biochen. Nutr. 2013;53:15–20. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.13-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Crawford A, et al. Glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase genotypes and activities and the progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011;26:2806–2813. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kawamoto T, et al. Role of steroid 11 beta-hydroxylase and steroid 18-hydroxylase in the biosynthesis of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in humans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:1458–1462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Delles C, et al. Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) −344 C/T polymorphism is associated with left ventricular structure in human arterial hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001;37:878–884. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01174-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tsukada K, et al. Positive association of CYP11B2 gene polymorphism with genetic predisposition to essential hypertension. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2002;16:789–793. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shi TY, et al. Association between XPF polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang E, et al. Association between polymorphisms in ERCC2 gene and oral cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:594. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Altinkilic EM, et al. RRM1, RRM2 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms in coronary artery disease. In Vivo. 2016;30:611–615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Durik M, et al. Nucleotide excision DNA repair is associated with age-related vascular dysfunction. Circulation. 2012;126:468–478. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.104380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Navarro-González JF, et al. Mineral metabolism and inflammation in chronic kidney disease patients: a cross-sectional study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(10):1646–1654. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02420409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Toraman A, et al. Is there a relationship between parathyroid hormone and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio or platelet lymphocyte ratio? Acta Endocrinol. 2019;5:96–101. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2019.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ranganath P, Tripathi G, Sharma RK, Sankhwar SN, Agrawal S. Role of non-HLA genetic variants in end-stage renal disease. Tissue Antigens. 2009;74:147–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2009.01276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bologa RM, et al. Interleukin-6 predicts hypoalbuminemia, hypocholesterolemia, and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1998;32:107–114. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9669431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Okada R, et al. Pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mittal RD, Manchanda PK. Association of interleukin (IL)-4 intron-3 and IL-6 −174 G/C gene polymorphism with susceptibility to end-stage renal disease. Immunogenetics. 2007;59:159–165. doi: 10.1007/s00251-006-0182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Roussanne MC, et al. Human parathyroid cell proliferation in response to calcium, NPS R-467, calcitriol and phosphate. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;31:610–616. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Himmelfarb J. Linking oxidative stress and inflammation in kidney disease: which is the chicken and which is the egg? Semin. Dial. 2004;17:449–454. doi: 10.1111/j.0894-0959.2004.17605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mohammedi K, et al. Allelic variations in superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) gene are associated with increased risk of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic subjects. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011;104:654–660. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hirata H, et al. Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes are associated with renal cell carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2006;342:1058–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang C, et al. Genotoxic stress and activation of novel DNA repair enzymes in human endothelial cells and in the retinas and kidneys of streptozotocin diabetic rats. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2012;28:329–337. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Trabulus S, et al. DNA repair XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is associated with the risk of development of end-stage renal disease. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012;39:6995–7001. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1529-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Radwan WM, Elbarbary HS, Alsheikh NM. DNA repair genes XPD and XRCC1 polymorphisms and risk of end-stage renal disease in Egyptian population. Ren. Fail. 2015;37:122–128. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.967646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Peng Z, et al. Association between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013;72:305–314. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2194-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Suvakov S, et al. Glutathione S-transferase A1, M1, P1 and T1 null or low-activity genotypes are associated with enhanced oxidative damage among haemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2013;28:202–212. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Koh N, et al. Severely reduced production of klotho in human chronic renal failure kidney. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001;280:1015–1020. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ko GJ, et al. The association of Klotho polymorphism with disease progression and mortality in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Blood Pres. Res. 2012;36:191–199. doi: 10.1159/000343408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chambers JC, et al. Genetic loci influencing kidney function and chronic kidney disease. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:373–375. doi: 10.1038/ng.566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Köttgen A, et al. Uromodulin levels associate with a common UMOD variant and risk for incident CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010;21:337–344. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009070725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Böger CA, et al. Association of eGFR-related loci identified by GWAS with incident CKD and ESRD. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lee C, Le MP, Wallingford JB. The shroom family proteins play broad roles in the morphogenesis of thickened epithelial sheets. Dev. Dyn. 2009;238:1480–1491. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Devuyst O, Dahan K, Pirson Y. Tamm-Horsfall protein or uromodulin: new ideas about an old molecule. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2005;20:1290–1294. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schlieper G, Westenfeld R, Brandenburg V, Ketteler M. Inhibitors of calcification in blood and urine. Semin. Dial. 2007;20:113–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wong KA, et al. The genetic diversity of cystinuria in a UK population of patients. BJU Int. 2015;116:109–116. doi: 10.1111/bju.12894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhou TB, Drummen GP, Jiang ZP, Li HY. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy susceptibility in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ren. Fail. 2015;37:1247–1259. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1064743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jamison RL, et al. Effect of the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms on survival in patients with advanced CKD and ESRD: a prospective study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2009;53:779–789. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hishida A, et al. MTHFR, MTR and MTRR polymorphisms and risk of chronic kidney disease in Japanese: cross-sectional data from the J-MICC Study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2013;45:1613–1620. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0432-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ramanathan G, Harichandana B, Kannan S, Elumalai R, Paul S. Association between end-stage diabetic nephropathy and MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) gene polymorphisms. Nephrology (Carlton) 2019;24:155–159. doi: 10.1111/nep.13208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Böger CA, Heid IM. Chronic kidney disease: novel insights from genome-wide association studies. Kidney Blood Pres. Res. 2011;34:225–234. doi: 10.1159/000326901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Friedman DJ, et al. Klotho variants and chronic hemodialysis mortality. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009;24:1847–1855. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wang Y, et al. Common genetic variants of MGP are associated with calcification on the arterial wall but not with calcification present in the atherosclerotic plaques. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2013;6:271–278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Corredor Marcilla, Z. F. Doctoral Thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona: Daño genómico como biomarcador de la enfermedad renal crónica, http://hdl.handle.net/10803/392683 (2016).
  • 83.Chang CC, et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience. 2015;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES