Skip to main content
Journal of Nuclear Medicine logoLink to Journal of Nuclear Medicine
. 2020 Jan;61(1):117–122. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.226712

PET Imaging of Tumor PD-L1 Expression with a Highly Specific Nonblocking Single-Domain Antibody

Gaochao Lv 1,*, Xiaorong Sun 2,*, Ling Qiu 1,, Yan Sun 3, Ke Li 1, Qingzhu Liu 1, Qi Zhao 4, Songbing Qin 4,, Jianguo Lin 1,
PMCID: PMC6954462  PMID: 31253743

Abstract

Although immunotherapy through programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint blockade has shown impressive clinical outcomes, not all patients respond to it. Recent studies have demonstrated that the expression level of PD-L1 in tumors is one of the factors that correlate with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy. Herein, a 68Ga-labeled single-domain antibody tracer, 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109, was designed and developed for specific and noninvasive imaging of PD-L1 expression in a melanoma-bearing mouse model. Methods: The single-domain antibody Nb109 was labeled with the radionuclide 68Ga through a NOTA chelator. An in vitro binding assay was performed to assess the affinity and binding epitope of Nb109 to PD-L1. The clinical application value of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was evaluated by a stability assay; by biodistribution and pharmacokinetics studies; and by PET imaging, autoradiography, and immunohistochemical staining studies on tumor-bearing models with differences in PD-L1 expression. Results: 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was obtained with a radiochemical yield of more than 95% and radiochemical purity of more than 98% in 10 min. It showed a highly specific affinity for PD-L1, with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 2.9 × 10−9 M. A competitive binding assay indicated Nb109 to have a binding epitope different from that of PD-1 and PD-L1 antibody. All biodistribution, PET imaging, autoradiography, and immunohistochemical staining studies revealed that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 specifically accumulated in A375-hPD-L1 tumor, with a maximum uptake of 5.0% ± 0.35% injected dose/g at 1 h. Conclusion: 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 holds great potential for noninvasive PET imaging of the PD-L1 status in tumors and for timely evaluation of the effect of immune checkpoint targeting treatment.

Keywords: immune checkpoints, PD-L1, PET, nanobody tracer


Immune checkpoints are inhibitory pathways of the immune system that maintain self-tolerance and prevent autoimmunity (1). One of the checkpoint receptors, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), has been widely studied in the context of clinical cancer immunotherapy, which serves as a negative regulator of T-cells (2). On binding to either of its 2 ligands, PD-L1 or PD-L2, PD-1 will initiate an inhibitory signaling cascade through its intracellular signaling domains, including an immunoreceptor tyrosine–based inhibitory motif and immunoreceptor tyrosine–based switch motif (3). By upregulating the expression level of PD-L1, tumor cells are capable of escaping immune recognition and attack (4). Recently, several immunotherapeutic antibodies that block the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have shown encouraging results in clinical applications, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab (5). The remarkable results prompted the Food and Drug Administration to accelerate approval of pembrolizumab and nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma in late 2014, and nivolumab was also approved for the treatment of non–small cell lung carcinoma in early 2015 (6).

Unfortunately, although the immunotherapy targeted PD-1/PD-L1 pathway shows impressive clinical outcomes, not all patients respond to this type of treatment (7). Several studies have demonstrated that the expression level of PD-L1 in tumors might be one factor that correlates with the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy (810). Thus, it is essential to analyze PD-L1 expression in patients before treatment to potentially avoid an ineffective cure and improve the success rate of immunotherapy. The traditional method for immunohistochemistry is limited in the analysis of PD-L1 expression in tumors because of the highly dynamic and heterogeneous expression of checkpoint molecules (11). Thus, there is an urgent need for real-time, dynamic, and exact detection of PD-L1 with high sensitivity and resolution (12). Recently, PET imaging with radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies showed important advantages over immunohistochemistry in the detection of PD-L1 expression (13). Besides the operator-independent procedure, both primary tumor and metastases can be evaluated by a single noninvasive whole-body imaging procedure, thereby avoiding sampling errors in the case of PD-L1 expression heterogeneity (14). Moreover, PET imaging also allows a more accurate quantitative assessment of the total amount of PD-L1 expression in an individual patient, which could provide important information for determining the treatment method or the dose of anti-PD-L1 therapy (1519). However, antibody agents often take many days to clear sufficiently from soft tissues and enable imaging of the target (20). An ideal PET imaging agent for PD-L1 should offer high uptake in PD-L1–positive tumors and low background signal in a short time (21). Because of their small size and favorable physicochemical properties, single-domain antibodies have attracted considerable attention and hold great potential in the design of PD-L1–targeting imaging agents (22).

Furthermore, prognostic evaluation of PD-L1 level is also crucial for monitoring therapeutic effects (23). Noteworthy is that the tracer and anti–PD-L1 therapeutic antibodies have different binding sites, which is a popular trait for the prognostic evaluation that could not be affected by the therapeutic antibodies in the course of treatment (24). In the current study, we screened and identified a nonblocking single-domain antibody with high specific affinity for PD-L1, namely Nb109. It was further conjugated with the chelator NOTA and labeled by the radionuclide 68Ga (Fig. 1). 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 showed promising clinical value in imaging of PD-L1 expression in xenograft tumors and holds great potential for guiding immunotherapy.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Schematic illustration of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 binding with PD-L1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated. p-SCN-Bn-NOTA was purchased from Macrocyclics. The PD-L1 antibody KN035 was kindly provided by Alphamab Co. Ltd. The mass spectra were measured by a high-resolution LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization source (Thermo Scientific), and the data were processed using Thermo Biopharma Finder 3.0. 68Ga was obtained from a 68Ga/68Ge generator (IGG-100; Eckert & Ziegler AG). High-performance liquid chromatography was performed on a Waters 2998 device with a size-exclusion chromatogram (G3000SWXL; Tosoh).

Production and Purification of Single-Domain Antibody

Anti-PD-L1 single-domain antibody DNA fragments were recloned in a suitable mammalian expression vector, pcDNA4 (catalog number V86220; Invitrogen). Human embryonic kidney suspension-adapted cells, HEK293F, were cultured according to standard protocols. Starter cultures (30–100 mL) were maintained in 250-mL conical cell culture flasks. To obtain transient cotransfection HEK293F cells, freestyle HEK293F cells were adapted to grow in suspension cultures, reaching high densities using serum-free medium. Then, the cells were transiently transfected using a branched version of polyethyleneimine. Intracellular proteins were harvested by centrifuging cells at 3,000g for 5 min. Single-domain antibodies were further purified using immobilized affinity chromatography and ion-exchange liquid chromatography on sulphopropyl resin (GE Healthcare), followed by buffer exchange to phosphate-buffered saline.

Synthesis of 69Ga-NOTA-Nb109

The precursor NOTA-Nb109 was obtained by conjugation of p-SCN-Bn-NOTA with amino groups of Nb109 according to a previous report (11). To a solution of Ga(NO3)3 (2.0 nmol) in 500 μL of 0.25 M sodium acetate, 0.05 M HCl was added to adjust the pH of the reaction system to 4.0, followed by the addition of NOTA-Nb109 (100 μg). The mixture was then incubated at room temperature for 10 min and purified with a PD-10 column.

Synthesis of the Probe 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109

The radionuclide 68Ga was eluted from a 68Ga/68Ge generator using 0.05 M HCl (5 mL) as the fractionated eluent. The single-domain antibody Nb109 (100 μg) was mixed with the metallic cation 68Ga3+ (1 mL) and sodium acetate (0.25 M, 225 μL). The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min and purified by a PD-10 column with saline as the eluent.

The purity and stability of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 were measured by radio–high-performance liquid chromatography/size-exclusion chromatography using 0.01 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

Binding Affinity Assay

The affinity of single-domain antibody Nb109 for immobilized human PD-L1 protein was tested using surface plasmon resonance. All measurements were performed on a Biacore T200 device at 25°C using 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid–buffered saline (0.01 M, pH 7.4; 0.15 M NaCl; 3 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; 0.005% polysorbate 20) as the running buffer. Briefly, 6 different dilutions of Nb109 (0.94, 1.85, 3.75, 7.5, 15, and 30 nM) were run at 50 μL/min on a CM5 sensor chip with a high density of human PD-L1 protein, and the specific binding signal (response units) was recorded. Nb109 dilutions were allowed to bind with the target protein for 300 s, and dissociation was monitored for 180 s. The equilibrium dissociation constant, KD, was calculated by fitting the obtained sensor grams to theoretic curves using Biacore Evaluation software.

The competition binding assay was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PD-L1-muFc and PD-1-Fc were expressed by HEK293 cell lines (pcDNA4, catalog number V86220; Invitrogen). PD-L1-muFc was coated on the plate as a capture reagent using 0.5 μg per well. The plate was incubated at 4°C overnight, and the excess of uncoated fusion protein was removed by washing the plate 3 times with phosphate buffer containing 0.01% polysorbate 20. Subsequently, 10 μg of PD-1-Fc were added, followed by the addition of Nb109 with a geometric dilution at an initial concentration of 100 μg/mL. After incubation at room temperature for 1 h, 100 μL of anti-His horseradish peroxidase (Abcam) were added to the plate and then reacted for another 1 h. The ELISA was developed by adding 100 μL of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzine substrate and subsequent incubation for 25 min at room temperature. The plates were read at an optical density of 405 nm with a VersaMax ELISA microplate reader (Molecular Devices).

Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

Human melanoma cell line A375 and human PD-L1 gene–transfected A375 cells (A375-hPD-L1) were kindly provided by Smart Nuclide Biotech and cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL). Human breast cancer cells, MCF-7, were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. MCF-7 cells were cultured in Eagle minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and human recombinant insulin (0.01 mg/mL; Sigma). All cells were grown in a monolayer in Falcon tissue culture dishes (Becton Dickinson) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

Flow Cytometry for PD-L1 Expression

The expression level of PD-L1 in A375-hPD-L1 and MCF-7 cell lines was analyzed using a PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (clone 44716) conjugated to phycoerythrin. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a Beckman Coulter Cytomics FC 500 MPL.

Cellular Uptake and Immunoreactivity

Cellular uptake was studied according to a previous report (10). The immunoreactive fraction was obtained by the Lindmo assay (25). For a competitive binding assay, the tumor cell (A375-hPD-L1) uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was studied with and without pretreatment with a 1,000-fold molar excess of unlabeled Nb109 or KN035. The PD-L1 antibody KN035 has been approved as an investigational new drug for the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid tumors (NCT02827968, NCT03101488, and NCT03248843) (4,26).

Animal Studies

At 5–7 wk of age, female BALB/c nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 1 × 106 A375-hPD-L1 or MCF-7 cells. To further demonstrate the PD-L1–targeting ability of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 and eliminate individual differences, different cancer cells—A375-hPD-L1, the mixture of A375-hPD-L1/A375 (1/1, v/v), and A375—were simultaneously inoculated into the left hind leg, right hind leg, and right foreleg of the same mouse subcutaneously, respectively. Experiments started when tumors reached a size of approximately 250–350 mm3. All experiments for animal research were conducted in accordance with the principles laid out by the ethical committee of Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine.

PET Imaging Studies

PET imaging was performed on an Inveon small-animal PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). Xenografted nude mice were injected with 4.0–5.0 MBq of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 via the tail vein. For the blocking group, the mice were pretreated with the antibody KN035 (5 mg/kg) 1 d in advance. The mice were anesthetized with 1.5%–2% isoflurane in a 0.5 L/min flow of oxygen. Static imaging (10 min) was performed at 1, 2, and 4 h after injection. Dynamic images were collected for 2 h. The obtained images were reconstructed using 3-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization (SP-MAP) without attenuation correction and then processed using a Siemens Inveon Research Workplace (IRW2.0.0.1050). Regions of interest were drawn over tumors and main organs, and average signal levels in the regions were measured.

Autoradiography and Immunohistochemical Staining for PD-L1 Expression

Ninety minutes after injection of the tracer, the animals were processed for autoradiography and immunohistochemical staining as previously reported (17,27).

Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetics Studies

Mice with subcutaneous A375-hPD-L1 or MCF-7 xenografts were divided into 2 groups (n = 5 each) and received an intravenous injection of 3.7 MBq of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109. At 1 and 2 h after injection, the mice were killed and the main organs were dissected, washed, weighed, and counted by a γ counter. Uptake of the radiotracer was expressed as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g). For the pharmacokinetics study, blood samples at different time points (0, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min) were collected and counted using a γ-counter. Statistical analysis was performed using Origin 7.5 (OriginLab).

RESULTS

Synthesis and Characterization of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109

The molecular weight of the obtained single-domain antibody, Nb109, was about 14 kDa, which was further determined accurately to be 13,612 amu (Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). The conjugate NOTA-Nb109 was prepared by coupling p-SCN-Bn-NOTA with the lysine of anti-PD-L1 single-domain antibody Nb109 (Fig. 2). Because there were 3 lysine residues in the framework region of Nb109, a mixture of single- and double-NOTA chelator conjugated with single-domain antibody molecule was produced (Supplemental Fig. 2). The success of the generation of the complex, 69Ga-NOTA-Nb109, was demonstrated by mass spectra characterization (Supplemental Fig. 3).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Synthetic scheme for 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109. RT = room temperature.

68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was produced with a radiochemical yield of more than 95% and a radiochemical purity of more than 98% in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0), and the molar activity was determined to be 25.17 ± 3.26 GBq/μmol (Supplemental Fig. 4A). The in vitro stability of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in phosphate buffer and serum was demonstrated by a radiochemical purity of more than 98% over 4 h at 75°C (Supplemental Figs. 4B and 4C). The immunoreactive fraction for 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was determined to be 67.7% ± 4.8% (Supplemental Fig. 5).

In Vitro Binding Assay of Nb109 to PD-L1

As shown in Figure 3A, Nb109 exhibited a strong affinity for PD-L1, with a relatively low equilibrium dissociation constant (KD = 2.9 × 10−9 M), a high binding-rate constant (Ka = 1.6 × 105 M−1·s−1), and a low dissociation-rate constant (Kd = 4.9 × 10−4 1/s). The typical S-type binding curves of Nb109 and 69Ga-NOTA-Nb109 to PD-L1 by ELISA also indicated their strong binding ability to PD-L1 (Supplemental Fig. 6).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

In vitro binding studies. (A) Affinity/kinetics surface plasmon resonance study of Nb109 interacting with immobilized recombinant human PD-L1 protein. (B) Binding curves for Nb109 (red) to PD-L1 at presence of PD-1 (green). (C) Uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in A375-hPD-L1 with or without pretreatment with 1,000-fold unlabeled Nb109 or KN035 at different times. (D) Ratio of cellular uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in A375-hPD-L1 before and after pretreatment with 1,000-fold KN035 for 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h. ***P < 0.001 vs. 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109. Ka = binding rate constant.

A competitive binding assay showed that the presence of PD-1 does not influence binding of Nb109 to PD-L1, since the typical S-type binding curve between Nb109 and PD-L1 was observed (Fig. 3B). In addition, the existence of Nb109 did not affect the binding of PD-1 to PD-L1, as the binding curve between PD-1 and PD-L1 showed virtually no change. To confirm the results, we investigated whether KN035 competed with 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in binding to A375-hPD-L1 cells. After pretreatment with a 1,000-fold excess of KN035 for 30 min, cellular uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 at 4 h was comparable to that in the untreated group, but it significantly decreased from 7.17% ± 1.01% to 1.94% ± 0.53% by pretreatment with the same amount of unlabeled Nb109 (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, after pretreatment with 1,000-fold KN035 for 0.5–4 h, cellular uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in A375-hPD-L1 was comparable to that in the untreated group, as the ratio of the pretreated group to the untreated group was always close to 1 (Fig. 3D).

Cellular uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 at 2 h was 6.3% ± 0.31% and 1.3% ± 0.44% for A375-hPD-L1 (PD-L1–positive) and MCF-7 (PD-L1–negative) cells, respectively (Supplemental Figs. 7 and 8), indicating the specificity of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 to PD-L1 in tumor cells.

PET Imaging

As shown in Figure 4A, A375-hPD-L1 tumor–bearing mice showed rapid and high uptake by tumors (5.32 ± 0.47 %ID/g) at 10 min after injection (Fig. 4B). The images were optimal at 1 h after injection, with the highest tumor-to-muscle ratio being 11.03 ± 0.36 (Fig. 4C). However, MCF-7 tumors were not visible at any time during the entire PET acquisition. In the A375-hPD-L1 tumor–bearing mice pretreated with the antibody KN035 (5 mg/kg) for 24 h, tumor uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was comparable to that in the animals that were not pretreated with KN035 (Figs. 4A and 4B).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

PET imaging studies of tumor-bearing models (n = 3). (A) Dynamic PET scanning of A375-hPD-L1 (with or without injection of KN035) and MCF-7 tumor–bearing models over 0–2 h after injection of 4.0–5.0 MBq of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109. (B and C) Biodistribution of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 and tumor-to-muscle (T/M) ratio analyzed according to quantification analysis of PET images.

In addition, PET static scanning was performed on 3 types of tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 5). As expected, A375-hPD-L1 tumor was clearly observed and showed the highest uptake of radioactivity at 1 h (4.94 ± 0.46 %ID/g) (Figs. 5A and 5B). For the A375-hPD-L1/A375 tumor mixture, uptake was almost half that in A375-hPD-L1 tumor at all time points and was 3.06 ± 0.31 %ID/g at 1 h. PD-L1–negative A375 tumor was not visible at any time during the acquisition. The results correlated well with PD-L1 expression as determined by immunohistochemistry; the PD-L1–positive area in A375-hPD-L1 and A375-hPD-L1/A375 tumors was determined to be 30% ± 6.36% and 15% ± 4.24%, respectively (Fig. 5C). The results were further confirmed by ex vivo autoradiography of tumors after imaging (Fig. 5D).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

PET imaging of tumor-bearing models. (A) Static images at 1, 2, and 4 h after injection of 2.5 MBq of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 (n = 3). (B) Uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in tumors according to quantification analysis of PET images. (C) PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining of tumors (n = 5, scale bar = 2.5 mm in left column and 100 μm in right column). (D) Autoradiography analysis of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in A375 (i), A375/A375-hPD-L1 (ii), and A375-hPD-L1 (iii) tumor (top) and quantitative analysis of autoradiography (bottom).

Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetics Study

The biodistribution of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in A375-hPD-L1 and MCF-7 tumor–bearing mice is presented in Figure 6. At 1 h after injection, the kidneys showed relatively high uptake (33.66 ± 3.26 %ID/g), whereas the liver (1.11 ± 0.41 %ID/g) and remaining organs (<1.5 %ID/g) showed low uptake. Tumor uptake in A375-hPD-L1–bearing mice was rapid and high (5.0 ± 0.35 %ID/g), but that in MCF-7–bearing mice was only 1.7 ± 0.36 %ID/g. At 2 h after injection, tumor uptake in both A375-hPD-L1– and MCF-7–bearing mice decreased slightly, to 4.05 ± 0.31 and 1.46 ± 0.34 %ID/g, respectively. The pharmacokinetics study showed that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 cleared quickly from the blood, with a half-life of 49.79 min (Supplemental Fig. 9), which resulted in a high tumor-to-muscle ratio (9.33 ± 0.82) and a high tumor-to-blood ratio (5.48 ± 0.12) at 1 h after injection in A375-hPD-L1 tumor–bearing mice (Supplemental Fig. 10). Although the tumor-to-muscle ratio decreased slightly to 6.76 ± 0.41 at 2 h after injection, the tumor-to-blood ratio increased to 7.07 ± 0.11. In contrast, at 2 h after injection, both the tumor-to-muscle ratio (0.98 ± 0.21) and the tumor-to-blood ratio (2.87 ± 0.13) were still low in MCF-7 tumor–bearing mice. In addition, more than 90% of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 was intact in the urine at 2 h after injection, further demonstrating the high in vivo stability of the single-domain antibody (Supplemental Fig. 2).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Biodistribution analysis at 1 and 2 h after injection of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 in A375-hPD-L1 and MCF-7 tumor–bearing models (n = 5). ***P < 0.001.

DISCUSSION

The immunotherapy-targeted PD-1/PD-L1 pathway shows impressive clinical outcomes, with several radiolabeled PD-L1 imaging agents having been reported recently (1320). They allow for visualization of PD-L1 status in patients before, during, and after therapeutic intervention and might be able to guide clinical treatment. Recently single-domain antibodies have shown promising results as imaging agents because of their favorable physicochemical properties, such as small size, high stability, rapid tumor uptake, and normal-tissue clearance. To facilitate protein isolation, single-domain antibodies are often modified with a histidine tag during protein production, which in turn leads to high kidney uptake and an increasing risk for immunogenicity. These qualities have become obstacles to their clinical application (28). Therefore, we designed a 68Ga-labeled single-domain antibody–based probe, 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109, without the histidine tag. It could be prepared at high purity and stability, and it holds great potential for PET imaging of PD-L1 expression in cancers.

The binding assay proved the strong binding ability of Nb109 to PD-L1, which had a KD value comparable to that of most reported PD-L1 antibodies (12). Furthermore, the similarity between the binding curves for 69Ga-NOTA-Nb109 and Nb109 to PD-L1 demonstrated the strong binding ability of 69Ga-NOTA-Nb109 to PD-L1 and indicated that conjugation of the chelator NOTA with 68Ga3+ had no effect on the affinity of Nb109 for PD-L1. Six-fold higher uptake of radioactivity in A375-hPD-L1 cells than in MCF-7 cells further confirmed the specificity of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 for PD-L1. All the results demonstrate that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 binds tumor cells in vitro in a PD-L1 expression–dependent manner.

Compared with most previously reported single-domain antibody–based imaging agents with a histidine tag (29), our tracer, 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109, showed much lower kidney retention because of lack of a histidine tag, as can be seen from the PET imaging and biodistribution studies. A higher tumor uptake in A375-hPD-L1–bearing mice than in MCF-7–bearing mice was observed, which was attributed to the overexpression of PD-L1 in A375-hPD-L1 tumor. This finding demonstrated that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 could specifically bind with PD-L1 in vivo. The retention of radioactivity in tumor remained relatively stable for 2 h, but radiotracer cleared quickly from muscle and blood, resulting in a high tumor-to-background ratio in A375-hPD-L1 tumor. Because of the low uptake in MCF-7 tumor, the tumor-to-background ratio was correspondingly low and tumors were not visible during the imaging process.

The competitive binding assay indicated that in vitro binding of Nb109 to PD-L1 was not influenced by PD-1 or KN035, even under a 1,000-fold excess, but could be blocked by nearly 80% by the same amount of unlabeled Nb109. This finding demonstrated the difference in binding epitopes between Nb109 and PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody, as well as the specificity of the tracer. For in vivo studies, this finding also confirmed that there was no impact on tumor uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 before and after injection of KN035, since comparable tumor uptake and images were obtained. Thus, the difference in binding sites between 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies to PD-L1 was demonstrated. The nonblocking binding property of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 endowed it with great potential for detection of PD-L1 and evaluation of prognosis in a clinical setting, as it could avoid the effect of anti-PD-L1 antibodies in the course of treatment.

Comparison of PET images of the 3 types of tumor-bearing mice clearly revealed that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 tended to accumulate in A375-hPD-L1 tumors because of the high PD-L1 expression. In A375-hPD-L1/A375 tumors, the PD-L1 expression decreased because of the doping of A375 cells, and thus the uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 decreased as anticipated. Moreover, since A375 cells had a low PD-L1 expression, A375 tumors were not visible during scanning. This finding was further confirmed by immunohistochemistry and autoradiography of the tumors after imaging. All results indicated that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 could selectively accumulate in PD-L1–positive A375-hPD-L1 tumor and rapidly clear from muscle and blood, resulting in a high tumor-to-background ratio.

CONCLUSION

A 68Ga-labeled single-domain antibody, 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109, was developed for PET imaging of PD-L1 in vivo. The tracer has a high affinity toward PD-L1, was generated at high radiochemical yield and radiochemical purity, and showed selective accumulation in PD-L1–positive tumors and rapid clearance from muscle and blood, resulting in a high tumor-to-background ratio. All results indicate that 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 has great potential for detecting PD-L1, evaluating therapeutic effect, and optimizing the prescription of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy.

DISCLOSURE

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972906), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181128), Project 333 of Jiangsu Province (BRA2016518 and LGY2018086), the Key Youth Medical Talent Project of Jiangsu Province (QNRC2016626 and QNRC2016629), the Science Technology Development Project of Wuxi (WX18IIAN049), and the Precision Medical Project of the Wuxi Commission of Health and Family Planning (J201806). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Supplementary Material

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: How can PD-L1 expression be detected rapidly and accurately in living subjects?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: A single-domain antibody–based PET tracer, 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109, with a high affinity for PD-L1 was developed. PET imaging studies on tumor-bearing models with high, medium, and low PD-L1 expression demonstrated that the tracer could distinctly distinguish different tumors and noninvasively quantify PD-L1 expression in tumors.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: 68Ga-NOTA-Nb109 holds great potential for detecting PD-L1, evaluating the immunotherapeutic effect, and optimizing the prescription of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Francis DM, Thomas SN. Progress and opportunities for enhancing the delivery and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;114:33–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ohaegbulam KC, Assal A, Lazar-Molnar E, et al. Human cancer immunotherapy with antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21:24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bellmunt J, Powles T, Vogelzang NJ. A review on the evolution of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for bladder cancer: the future is now. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;54:58–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang F, Wei H, Wang X, et al. Structural basis of a novel PD-L1 nanobody for immune checkpoint blockade. Cell Discov. 2017;3:17004–17016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Emens LA, Ascierto PA, Darcy PK, et al. Cancer immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges in the rapidly evolving clinical landscape. Eur J Cancer. 2017;81:116–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhan MM, Hu X, Liu X, et al. From monoclonal antibodies to small molecules: the development of inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21:1027–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Geng Q, Jiao P, Jin P, et al. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for immuno-oncology: from antibodies to small molecules. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;23:6033–6041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hettich M, Braun F, Bartholomä MD, et al. High-resolution PET imaging with therapeutic antibody-based PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint tracers. Theranostics. 2016;6:1629–1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.England CG, Ehlerding EB, Hernandez R, et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics and biodistribution studies of 89Zr-labeled pembrolizumab. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:162–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Du Y, Liang X, Li Y, et al. Nuclear and fluorescent labeled PD-1-liposome-DOX-64Cu/IRDye800CW allows improved breast tumor targeted imaging and therapy. Mol Pharm. 2017;14:3978–3986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Natarajan A, Mayer AT, Xu L, et al. Novel radiotracer for immunoPET imaging of PD-1 checkpoint expression on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Bioconjug Chem. 2015;26:2062–2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.González Trotter DE, Meng X, McQuade P, et al. In vivo imaging of the programmed death ligand 1 by 18F positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1852–1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Donnelly DJ, Smith RA, Morin P, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a novel 18F-labeled adnectin as a PET radioligand for imaging PD-L1 expression. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:529–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mayer AT, Natarajan A, Gordon SR, et al. Practical immuno-PET radiotracer design considerations for human immune checkpoint imaging. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:538–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Truillet C, Oh HLJ, Yeo SP, et al. Imaging PD-L1 expression with immunoPET. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29:96–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chatterjee S, Lesniak WG, Miller MS, et al. Rapid PD-L1 detection in tumors with PET using a highly specific peptide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;483:258–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Silva RA, Kumar D, Lisok A, et al. Peptide-based 68Ga-PET radiotracer for imaging PD-L1 expression in cancer. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:3946–3952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kumar D, Lisok A, Dahmane E, et al. Peptide-based PET quantifies target engagement of PD-L1 therapeutics. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:616–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lesniak WG, Chatterjee S, Gabrielson M, et al. PD-L1 detection in tumors using [64Cu]atezolizumab with PET. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:2103–2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Natarajan A, Patel CB, Habte F, et al. Dosimetry prediction for clinical translation of 64Cu-pembrolizumab immunoPET targeting human PD-1 expression. Sci Rep. 2018;8:633–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.England CG, Jiang D, Ehlerding EB, et al. 89Zr-labeled nivolumab for imaging of T-cell infiltration in a humanized murine model of lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:110–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schumacher D, Helma J, Schneider AFL, et al. Nanobodies: chemical functionalization strategies and intracellular applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57:2314–2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang Q, Lou W, Di W, et al. Prognostic value of tumor PD-L1 expression combined with CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;52:7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bailly C, Cléry P, Faivre-Chauvet A, et al. Immuno-PET for clinical theranostic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;18:57–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lindmo T, Boven E, Cuttitta F, et al. Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess. J Immunol Methods. 1984;72:77–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li D, Cheng S, Zou S, et al. Immuno-PET imaging of 89Zr labeled anti-PD-L1 domain antibody. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:1674–1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou Z, Vaidyanathan G, McDougald D, et al. Fluorine-18 labeling of the HER2-targeting single-domain antibody 2Rs15d using a residualizing label and preclinical evaluation. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:867–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xavier C, Vaneycken I, D’huyvetter M, et al. Synthesis, preclinical validation, dosimetry, and toxicity of 68Ga-NOTA-anti-HER2 nanobodies for iPET imaging of HER2 receptor expression in cancer. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:776–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Broos K, Keyaerts M, Lecocq Q, et al. Non-invasive assessment of murine PD-L1 levels in syngeneic tumor models by nuclear imaging with nanobody tracers. Oncotarget. 2017;8:41932–41946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Journal of Nuclear Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

RESOURCES