Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
letter
. 2020 Jan 10;24:11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2724-y

Optimizing ceftolozane-tazobactam dosage during continuous renal replacement therapy: some nuances

Gerardo Aguilar 1,2,3,, Rafael Ferriols 2,3,4, Sara Martínez-Castro 1, Carlos Ezquer 3,4, Ernesto Pastor 1, Jose A Carbonell 1, Manuel Alós 2,3,4, David Navarro 2,3,5
PMCID: PMC6954510  PMID: 31924240

We have read the recent letter by Honore et al. [1] about our findings published in this journal regarding the influence of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on the pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) [2]. In our report, we decided to administer a 3 g/iv dose every 8 h taking into account two previous studies referenced in our paper [2] and another one which showed CRRT to be an independent predictor of clinical failure (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.18–17.39, p = 0.02) when C/T is administered at 1.5 g every 8 h [3].

As Honore et al. explain in their paper, the C/T eliminitation was assumed by hemodiafiltration and the adsorption was not assessed [1]. However, there is a misunderstanding in this letter [1], because we used a polysulphone membrane (Fresenius, Germany) instead of an acrylonitrile 69 Multiflow (AN-69-M). In contrast to highly adsorptive membranes (HAM; e.g., AN69 surface-treated, AN69-ST), the antibiotic adsorption with polysulphone ones is negligible, which facilitates antibiotic adaptation during CRRT [4].

Our data should not be extrapolated to other clinical scenarios, as noted by Honore et al. [1]. In our report, ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations remained above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), for MICs of up to 8 μg/mL, but we estimated that the administration of standard doses of 1 g/0.5 g, even with polysulphone membranes, could compromise the effectiveness of C/T for not reaching adequate tazobactam concentrations. Thus, the use of HAM would represent a real risk factor of clinical failure when a C/T dose of 1.5 g every 8 h is administered, especially in multidrug-resistant infections [3]. Therefore, we agree with Honore et al. [1] that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical when using C/T for patients receiving CRRT, especially when MICs of bacteria like multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa are considered very high. However, the recommendation of continuous (over 24 h) vs extended (over 2 to 4 h) or intermittent (over 30 to 60 min) infusion of beta-lactams is still under debate [5].

Acknowledgements

None

Abbreviations

AN-69-M

Acrylonitrile 69 Multiflow

AN-69-ST

AN69-surface treated

C/T

Ceftolozane-tazobactam

CRRT

Continuous renal replacement therapy

HAM

Highly adsorptive membranes

MDR

Multidrug-resistant

MIC

Minimal inhibitory concentration

Authors’ contributions

GA, RF, and DN designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

This reply refers to the comment available at: 10.1186/s13054-019-2692-2.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Gerardo Aguilar, Email: gerardo.aguilar@uv.es.

Rafael Ferriols, Email: rafael.ferriols@uv.es.

Sara Martínez-Castro, Email: saradacuris@hotmail.com.

Carlos Ezquer, Email: cezquer@incliva.es.

Ernesto Pastor, Email: ernesto.pastormz@gmail.com.

Jose A. Carbonell, Email: joseacarbonell19@gmail.com

Manuel Alós, Email: manuel.alos@uv.es.

David Navarro, Email: david.navarro@uv.es.

References

  • 1.Honore PM, Mugisha A, Gutierrez LB, Redant S, Kaefer K, Gallerani A, De Bels D. Optimizing ceftolozane-tazobactam dosage during continuous renal replacement therapy: additional insights. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2692-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aguilar G, Ferriols R, Martínez-Castro S, Ezquer C, Pastor E, Carbonell JA, Alós M, Navarro D. Optimizing ceftolozane-tazobactam dosage in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2434-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bassetti M, Castaldo N, Cattelan A, Mussini C, Righi E, Tascini C, et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious P. aeruginosa infections: a multicenter nationwide clinical experience. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(4):408–415. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Honore PM, Spapen HD. What a clinician should know about a renal replacement membrane? J Transl Intern Med. 2018;6:62–65. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2018-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee YR, Miller PD, Alzghari SK, Blanco DD, Hager JD, Kuntz KS. Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of beta-lactams in critically ill patients with respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2018;43(2):155–170. doi: 10.1007/s13318-017-0439-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES