Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Insect Science logoLink to Journal of Insect Science
. 2020 Jan 12;20(1):7. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iez128

Assessment of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) Diets on Adult Fecundity and Larval Development: Insights Into Employing the Sterile Insect Technique

Qiu-Li Hou 1,2, Er-Hu Chen 1, Wei Dou 1, Jin-Jun Wang 1,✉
Editor: Muhammad Chaudhury
PMCID: PMC6955104  PMID: 31927595

Abstract

Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) is a notorious insect pest that attacks diverse vegetables and fruits worldwide. The sterile insect technique has been developed as an environmentally friendly and effective control method that depends on the mass production of target flies. Because dietary yeast (protein) and sucrose (carbohydrate) are important in adult diets, yeast:sucrose (Y:S) mixtures are crucial for the mass-rearing of B. dorsalis. In this study, we found adult diets with different ratios of yeast to sucrose-influenced fecundity, and an extremely high or low Y:S ratios significantly decreased egg production of B. dorsalis. Additionally, the maximum oviposition efficiency was realized at dietary yeast to sucrose ratios of 1:1 and 1:3, suggesting their potential use to produce more eggs for the mass production of B. dorsalis. Here, new gel diets having different yeast concentrations (g/L water) were also assessed for rearing B. dorsalis larvae. Gel diets containing 20 g/L yeast led to a higher pupation, pupal weight and adult eclosion rate, and a shorter developmental time than other yeast concentrations. Moreover, the present gel diet also resulted in greater pupal production and adult emergence rates than previously used liquid and solid artificial diets, revealing that it is suitable for rearing B. dorsalis larvae. This research provides a useful reference on artificial diets mixtures for mass rearing B. dorsalis, which is critical for employing the sterile insect technique.

Keywords: Bactrocera dorsalis, sterile insect technique, dietary yeast, fecundity, larval development

The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), is an important and destructive pest species that can infect many commercial tropical and subtropical crops (fruits and vegetables) worldwide, resulting in severe economic losses (Clarke et al. 2005). Owing to its high invasive capability, B. dorsalis has greatly expanded its geographic distribution over the last century. The first recorded report of B. dorsalis was in Taiwan (Wan et al. 2012), and it has since colonized the Asian and Pacific regions, ranging from India to Hawaii, with temporary occurrences in Florida and California (Clarke et al. 2005, Wan et al. 2011). Bactrocera dorsalis is also a polyphagous insect that deposits eggs into fruits. The eggs hatch into larvae that feed inside fruits, which can seriously damage a large number of commercial host plants, such as citrus, carambola, banana, peach, mandarin, and mango (Geib et al. 2014, Hou et al. 2017). Thus, B. dorsalis is considered a major threat to world agriculture. Additionally, because of excessive pesticide use, B. dorsalis has developed high levels of resistance to insecticides, making it necessary to find more sustainable approaches to control this pest (Jin et al. 2011).

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is an environmentally friendly, noninsecticidal, and species-specific method to control agricultural pest populations (Knipling 1955). Moreover, SIT is a particularly effective technique, which has been successfully applied for area-wide pest management, especially for Tephritidae fruit fly pests, such as the Queensland (Bactrocera tryoni), Mediterranean (Ceratitis capitata), and Mexican (Anastrepha ludens) fruit flies (Jessup et al. 2007, Gerald et al. 2009, Sánchez‐Rosario et al. 2017).

For the SIT, large numbers of sterilized males need to be released into the wild to compete with wild males for females. Consequently, the wild females that mate with sterile males go through reproductive failure and produce no offspring. The successful implementation of SIT mainly relies on the number of released sterile male flies, and a greater number of treated males could significantly increase the mating efficiency with wild female flies. Thus, developing an efficient mass-rearing method to produce high-quality flies is a key step in the SIT.

For B. dorsalis, SIT offers a promising potential strategy for the biological control of this damaging fly (Zhao et al. 2013, Ali et al. 2017). Many external factors, such as temperature, photoperiod, fly density, and oviposition devices, can directly affect the quality of the flies, but also the artificial diet is of crucial importance for mass-reared fruit flies as reported in Queensland fruit fly (Moadeli et al. 2018a,b). Therefore, to increase the SIT’s efficiency, studies have focused on improving artificial diets (Aquino et al. 2016, Chang 2017, Moadeli et al. 2017). Furthermore, yeast and sucrose are not only the respective source of protein and carbohydrate, but also provide vitamins, lipids, and minerals to support insect development. Therefore, they are the main nutritional ingredients in diets used for the mass-rearing of fruit flies (adult and larval stages; Chan et al. 1990, Ling et al. 2000, Moadeli et al. 2018b). Previous studies showed that the nutritional quality of the diet significantly affected the male reproductive success, female fecundity, and larval development in fruit flies (Blay and Yuval 1997, Kaspi et al. 2002, Mohamed et al. 2016). Females fed with protein source attained high fecundity level, and reducing the amount of protein source in the diet negatively affected fecundity and ovary maturation (Goane et al. 2019). Additionally, the larval diet had a significant effect on adult development and behavior, such as insect egg productions (Telang et al. 2004), female oviposition preference (Matavelli et al. 2015), and flight ability (Moadeli et al. 2017). Interestingly, expensive protein source or nutritious diets do not necessarily translate into a better performance of the resulting flies compared with low-cost diets (Pascacio-Villafán et al. 2015, Goane et al. 2019). The proportion of nutritional composition of artificial diets is important for B. dorsalis (Aluja et al. 2001, Rohlfs and Hoffmeister 2005, Ling 2009). Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the impact of adult diets with different yeast:sucrose (Y:S) mixtures on adult fecundity and ovary development, and also of larval gel diets with varied yeast concentrations on the larval growth and pupal performance to determine optimal diets for the mass-rearing of B. dorsalis.

Materials and Methods

Flies

The oriental fruit fly, B. dorsalis, was originally collected from Hainan Province, People’s Republic of China. The newly hatched adult flies were sorted by sex and offered with diets at different yeast ratios, as described above. To confirm the experimental cohorts were of a uniform age, the virgin flies were collected within 24 h after adult emergence. Then, fresh orange pulp was used to collect eggs. After egg hatching, the larvae were reared on gel larval diets having different yeast concentrations, and the third-instar larvae were transferred into a plastic basin containing sand for pupation. All stages of B. dorsalis were reared at 27 ± 1°C and 70% ± 5% relative humidity with a photoperiod cycle of 14 h light/10 h dark.

Experiment 1: Adult Rearing Media

For the experimental adult fly diets, the diets were varied to the following yeast:sucrose ratios (Y:S): 100:0, 96:1, 48:1, 24:1, 12:1, 6:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, 1:6, 1:12, 1:24, 1:48, 1:96, and 1:100 by altering the amount of yeast extract (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) per 100 g of adult food, and the details of the adult diets used in this experiment are shown in Table 1. Strictly speaking, the flies were given ad libitum access to all diluted yeast diets, and the yeast used here mainly contained protein (62.5%), but also comprised water soluble B-complex vitamins, sodium chloride, lipids, and minerals with a pH (0.5% solution) of 7.0 ± 0.2 at 25°C. In this study, we used the fecundity (egg production and ovary development) as the measured parameters to evaluate the adult-rearing diet (Davies et al. 2005).

Table 1.

Adult diets are expressed as grams of yeast and sucrose per 100 g in Bactrocera dorsalis

Adult diets (yeast: sucrose) Yeast (g/100 g of adult diets) Sucrose (g/100 g of adult diets)
100: 0 100.00 0.00
96: 1 98.97 1.03
48: 1 97.96 2.04
24: 1 96.00 4.00
12: 1 92.31 7.69
6: 1 85.71 14.29
3: 1 75.00 25.00
1: 1 50.00 50.00
1: 3 25.00 75.00
1: 6 14.29 85.71
1: 12 7.69 92.31
1: 24 4.00 96.00
1: 48 2.04 97.96
1: 96 1.03 98.97
0: 100 0.00 100.00
Open in a new tab

Effects of Adult Diets on Egg Production

For each adult diet having different Y:S mixtures (100:0, 96:1, 48:1, 24:1, 12:1, 6:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, 1:6, 1:12, 1:24, 1:48, 1:96, and 1:100), 10 jars (100-mm height; 70-mm diameter) were established to study the fecundity response. Each jar contained five females and five males (n = 50 females for each treatment). Diets and water were provided in two separate small vessels, placed inside the jar, and replaced every 2 d. Then, an oviposition device (2-ml microfuge tubes) that consisted of 1.5-ml orange juice and 16 pinholes on the surface was used to collect eggs and the eggs number was counted from days 5 to 13 after adult emergence.

Effects of Adult Diets on Ovary Development

For each yeast level, 10 cylindrical jars (100 mm in height × 70 mm in diameter) were established to investigate the impact of adult diets with different yeast concentrations on ovary development in B. dorsalis. Each jar included five females and five males, and per treatment we used 50 flies. Diets and water were placed inside the jar and replaced every 2 d. Then, the females were collected and dissected from each diet to observe ovary development. A Leica M205A stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to capture images of ovaries and to measure the maximum diameter of each ovary.

Experiment 2: Larval Rearing Media

The performances of B. dorsalis flies reared on larval liquid and solid carrot-based diets have been studied (Anato et al. 2017), and the detailed compositions of these two diets are provided in Table 2. Based on the previous liquid diet (Chang et al. 2006), we developed a new gel larval diet for B. dorsalis that contains agar, nipagin, sorbic acid, ascorbic acid, linoleic acid, water, sucrose, and yeast (Oxoid; Table 2). Additionally, the nutritional resources of the wheat germ and corn powders were also added as nutritional supplements for yeast. To determine the appropriate yeast contents, five artificial larval diets differing in yeast concentrations (0, 10, 20, 60, and 100 g/L) were used to manipulate the larval resource availability. To prepare the gel diets for each yeast formulation, the agar was mixed with the water and heated for 4 min in a stove to activate the agar. After heating, the other dry ingredients were added into the agar and mixed using a blender until all the diets were fully homogenous. Then, the diets were cooled to room temperature.

Table 2.

Composition of the previous (Anato et al. 2017) liquid, solid, and the present gel diets for rearing larvae of Bactrocera dorsalis

Ingredients Anato-2017 Carrot-based solid diet (%) Anato-2017 Liquid diet (per 1L water) The present gel diet (per 1L water)
Agar – – 6 g/L
Wheat germ powder – – 25 g/L
Corn powder – – 60 g/L
nipagen – 1.1 g/L 1.4 g/L
Sorbic acid – – 0.7 g/L
Ascorbic acid – – 1 g/L
Linoleic acid – – 0.2 ml/L
Potassium sorbate 0.40% – –
Sodium benzoate – 1.1 g/L –
Citric acid 0.60% 15.5 g/L –
Dehydrated carrot paste 74.70% – –
Water – 1 L 1 L
Sucrose 16.20% 73.5 g/L 10 g/L
yeast 8.10% 142.1 g/L 0 g/L
– – 10 g/L
– – 20 g/L
– – 60 g/L
– – 100 g/L
Open in a new tab

–, Absent in the diet.

Evaluation of Larval Development Parameters

To evaluate the effects of different concentrations of yeast on the development of B. dorsalis, some parameters, including pupation rate, pupal weight, development time (egg–pupa), and adult emergence, were measured (Khan et al. 2013). Here, 10 ml of each gel larval diet was placed into a Petri dish (55 mm), and 50 eggs were transferred to the surface of each diet. Then, the Petri dish was incubated in the stable laboratory environment (27 ± 1°C at 70% ± 5% relative humidity), and 10 replicates were conducted per yeast concentration. The pupae generated from each diet were collected from sand to calculate the pupation rate (the number of pupae divided by the initial number of collected eggs), and pupal weight at 3 d postpupal eclosion was estimated as the mean weight of collected pupae in the same replicate (it should be noted that weighing pupae with mixed ages is a confounding factor as pupae lose weight with age, here only the same age pupae that at 3 d postpupal eclosion were chose for pupa weight). For the assessment of development time (egg–pupal period), the mean numbers of days required for each fly to go from egg to pupa were calculated. For the adult emergence rate, the pupae were collected and placed in a cylindrical jar (100 mm in height × 70 mm in diameter) without food and water. After all the emerged flies had died, fly emergence was determined as the initial number of pupae minus the pupae that did not emerge per replicate.

Statistical Analyses

For the experiment 1 with the adult rearing media, the predictor variables were Y:S ratios, and the response variables included egg production and ovary development in B. dorsalis. In the experiment 2 with the larval rearing media, the yeast concentrations in the gel diets were the predictor variables, and the larval development parameters, pupation rate, pupal weight, development time (egg–pupa), and adult emergence were considered as the response variables. For the measurement scales of these variables, the Y:S ratios and yeast concentrations were considered as categorical data, and the egg production (the number of eggs) was considered as the discrete data (count data), and the ovary development (the maximum diameter of ovary), pupation rate, pupal weight, development time (egg–pupa), and adult emergence were considered as continuous data. In the present study, the SPSS 16.0 for Windows (IBM, Chicago, IL) was used for the statistical analyses. The normality and homoscedasticity analysis showed that these variables were normally distributed with the constant variance, and thus, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was the appropriate analysis for those specific variables. Means were separated using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test (P < 0.05). Additionally, percentage values have been transformed by using arcsin square-root before subjected to ANOVA. The values of count data (egg production) have also been log-transformed for the subsequent ANOVA analysis.

Results

Experiment 1: Egg Production

There was a significant effect of adult diet treatments on fecundity, and the egg numbers laid by per fly per day showed a parabolic shape (Fig. 1; F = 21.50; df = 8, 81; P < 0.001). Specifically, all of the female flies reared on high Y:S ratios, from 100:0 to 24:1, died before egg laying. Although the flies could survive on the extreme low Y:S ratios, 1:96 and 0:100, no eggs were produced. For the Y:S ratios ranging from 12:1 to 1:1, the egg numbers significantly increased as the yeast concentrations decreased in the diets. On the contrary, as the Y:S ratios decreased from 1:1 to 1:48, the number of eggs significantly decreased. The fecundity levels on diets with 1:1 and 1:3 Y:S ratios were higher than those on any other diet regimes.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Daily number of eggs laid per female Bactrocera dorsalis fed on diets containing different yeast ratios. In total, 10 replicates were conducted, and the data are presented as means ± SEs. Bars with different letters above them differ significantly at P < 0.05.

Ovary Development

Consistent with egg production, a significant effect of adult diet regimes was found on ovary development (F = 56.79; df = 8, 81; P < 0.001), and the ovaries of flies reared on diets with 1:1 and 1:3 Y:S ratios developed better than on any other B. dorsalis diet treatments (Fig. 2A). Namely, the ovary size (the diameter of the entire ovary per fly) of the female adults reared on diets with 1:1 and 1:3 Y:S ratios was 2.47 ± 0.19 mm and 2.37 ± 0.067 mm, respectively, which was significantly greater than those of females reared on diets with other yeast ratios (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

(A) Ovaries of 13-d-old female Bactrocera dorsalis fed on diets containing different yeast ratios. (B) The differences in the sizes of ovaries from different yeast ratios indicated by the average maximum diameter. In total, 10 replicates were conducted, and the data are presented as means ± SEs. Bars with different letters above them differ significantly at P < 0.05.

Experiment 2: Pupation Rate

There was a significant impact of yeast concentrations on the pupation rate; Bactrocera dorsalis fed on the 10 and 20 g/L yeast diets had higher pupation rates (0.82 ± 0.094 and 0.88 ± 0.037, respectively) than the other two diet regimes (60 g/L, 0.43 ± 0.044 and 100 g/L, 0.17 ± 0.034; F = 36.13; df = 3, 36; P < 0.001). Bactrocera dorsalis could not survive on the 0 g/L yeast diet (Fig. 3A), and there was no significant difference in the pupation rates between the 10- and 20-g/L yeast diets.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

(A) Pupation rates and (B) pupal weights of Bactrocera dorsalis fed on gel diets containing different yeast concentrations. In total, 10 replicates were conducted, and the data are presented as means ± SEs. Bars with different letters above them differ significantly at P < 0.05.

Pupal Weight

The pupal weights from each larval diet were 12.93 ± 0.73 mg (10 g/L), 16.77 ± 0.23 mg (20 g/L), 15.31 ± 0.27 mg (60 g/L), and 11.64 ± 0.50 mg (100 g/L; Fig. 3B). Pupae from larvae reared on the 20- and 60-g/L yeast diet had greater pupal weights than those reared on the other two concentrations (F = 23.57; df = 3, 36; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pupal weight between the 20- and 60-g/L yeast diets.

Development Time (Egg–Pupa)

Here, the feeding of different diet formulations resulted in significant differences in the time required by B. dorsalis to develop from egg to pupa (Fig. 4A; F = 112.63; df = 3, 36; P < 0.001). The flies fed on the 20-g/L yeast diet had the shortest development time (11.77 ± 0.07 d), when compared with the other three diet regimes (10 g/L, 13.22 ± 0.18 d; 60 g/L, 12.56 ± 0.09 d; and 100 g/L, 14.93 ± 0.14 d).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

(A) Development times (egg–pupa) and (B) adult emergence rates of Bactrocera dorsalis fed on gel diets containing different yeast concentrations. In total, 10 replicates were conducted, and the data are presented as means ± SEs. Bars with different letters above them differ significantly at P < 0.05.

Adult Emergence Rate

Because of the absence of B. dorsalis pupae produced on the 0 g/L diet, the fly emergence rate could not be tested on this diet. For the other diets, the B. dorsalis adult emergence rates were greater on the 10 g/L (78.71% ± 0.0046) and 20 g/L (78.17% ± 0.035) yeast diets than the other two yeast concentration diets (60 g/L, 63.06% ± 0.011 and 100 g/L, 33.78% ± 0.025; Fig. 4B; F = 28.38; df = 3, 36; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the adult emergence rate between 10- and 20-g/L yeast diets.

Discussion

Because yeast and sucrose are the main source of nutrients for adult fly artificial diets, their proportions in the diet is the leading determinant of the B. dorsalis’ egg production (Skorupa et al. 2008). For B. dorsalis, we found a significant effect of the Y:S ratios on adult fecundity, and its egg numbers significantly declined as the yeast ratio decreased in the diet within certain Y:S ratios (from 1:1 to 0:100). Similarly, it has been reported that diets with a high yeast proportion can increase the fecundity level with high egg production in flies (Lee et al. 2008, Chen et al. 2013, Schultzhaus and Carney 2017). Additionally, female flies fed on diets containing extremely low Y:S ratios of 1:96 and 0:100 laid no eggs, indicating that a certain amount of yeast intake is necessary for fecundity in B. dorsalis. However, we also found that flies fed on diets with relatively high Y:S ratios, from 3:1 to 100:0, had a significantly decreased egg production, and at some levels, flies could not survive and died before egg-laying. The diet with excess of protein might be toxic (Piper and Partridge 2007) or/and affect physiological and metabolic processes, such as the down-regulation of cellular repair pathways (Martingronert et al. 2008) and the production of reactive oxygen species (Mohanty et al. 2002, Caro et al. 2009). Hence, it might be too costly for producing a nutrient-rich adult diet (Sentinella et al. 2013).

In many insects, dietary yeast and sucrose mixtures play a vital role in the formation of yolk proteins that can trigger the initiation of ovary development, which would be significantly affected by changing the dietary yeast concentrations (Chippindale et al. 1993, Lu et al. 2016). In this paper, the development of ovaries in female flies of B. dorsalis was investigated and their development was also changed, following the same variation tendency as B. dorsalis’ egg laid among the diets with different Y:S ratios. Therefore, we speculated that the differences in egg production might be the results of differences in ovarian development. The dietary Y:S mixtures might control the expression of vitellogenin, which influences ovarian development, by regulating some nutritional signaling pathways (Smykal and Raikhel 2015, Chen et al. 2017). Here, adult-acquired diets with an appropriate Y:S proportion was of importance to egg production, and the adult diets containing 1:1 and 1:3 Y:S ratios resulted in a maximum egg production and the development of larger B. dorsalis’ ovaries. Based on our data, as yeast is more costly than sucrose, the 1:3 Y:S ratio-containing (25% yeast and 75% sucrose) adult diet is the best choice for rearing B. dorsalis.

For larval diets, the solid diets based on carrot (Daucus carota L.; Christenson et al. 1956) and liquid diets (Chang et al. 2004) have been developed for fruit flies. The disadvantages of solid diet are the inconsistent quality of the bulking agent, the risk of pesticide contamination, the metabolic heat, and most seriously, the disposal of the spent diet, which can result in a large amount of waste that could contain living pupae and larvae that constitute a great threat to the ‘‘fruit fly-free’ regions (Chang et al. 2004, Chang 2009). Although liquid diets do not contain biological bulking agents and are suitable for rearing some fruit flies, including Bactrocera cucurbitae (Schroeder et al. 1971), C. capitata (Ling et al. 2007), Anastrepha fraterculus (Vera et al. 2014), and B. dorsalis (Anato et al. 2017). There are still some issues in large-scale rearing processes (Chang 2004, Chang 2009), namely, the cleaning and frequent replacement of substrates, the separation of ingredients, and, owing to fermentation, the diet becoming viscous, which can lead to larval mortality (Pascacio-Villafán et al. 2018).

In the present study, to overcome the drawbacks of solid and liquid diets as describe above, we developed a new gel larval diet by adding agar to the B. dorsalis larval diets. Gelling agents may improve fly larval diets by removing the physical substrates, preventing the settling of dense materials and preventing fermentation. They are also convenient for insect movement and pupation and are easy to handle (Moadeli et al. 2017). Agar is highly clear, stable, nontoxic, and resistant to metabolism during culturing, making it the ideal gelling agent for fruit fly larval diets (Henderson and Kinnersley 1988, Jain et al. 2005). The previous studies showed that agar is used as an economical and effective gelling agent in the diets of B. tryoni (Moadeli et al. 2017), Bactrocera oleae (Hanife 2008), and C. capitata (Pašková 2007).

Therefore, the gel larval diet was used in this study and we found that the dietary yeast concentration had significant effects on larval performance, and flies could not survive on the yeast-free diet, which further indicated that yeast is an indispensable nutritional component of artificial B. dorsalis diets. In addition, high yeast concentrations had negative impacts on larval development, with extremely low pupal production, suggesting detrimental effects of high yeast ratios on development (Nestel et al. 2004). Bactrocera dorsalis appeared to develop better on 20 g/L, as assessed by a higher pupation rate, pupal weight and adult emergency rate, and shorter development time, than on any other dietary treatment. When compared with previous artificial diets, the present gel diet (20 g/L yeast) also allowed a higher pupal production (88%) and adult emergence (78%) than the solid diet (8% and 37%, respectively) or liquid diet (74% and 61%, respectively), indicating that this diet had great potential for rearing B. dorsalis larvae for SIT-based programs (Anato et al. 2017).

However, we realized that there were some limitations in our experimental designs and data analyses. For example, the present study mainly focused on analysis in testing the effect of different adult diet regimes on fecundity ability, but not clearly clarified the changes in ovary size and egg production that were caused by yeast, sucrose, or their interactions. Therefore, the additional two-factor interaction model analysis could be used to study the contribution of each component (yeast and sucrose) and their interactions on fecundity ability of B. dorsalis in the future (Pascacio-Villafán et al. 2016). In addition, another limitation was that we varied the yeast content of larval diet without changing all other larval diet components, which could result in the final amount of experimental diets varied. Consequently, we were not sure that the response of insects to diet was caused by the proportion of their ingredients or the absolute amounts of the larval diets. To overcome this problem, the two-component mixtures (including yeast and corn) experiments (each component is in the design space) could be applied to confirm the total amount of larval diet remains constant (Lapointe et al. 2008, Pascacio-Villafán et al. 2017).

In conclusion, the main aim of this research was to determine the most suitable dietary yeast and sucrose mixtures that resulted in a high fecundity level and preferable larval performance for the mass-rearing of B. dorsalis. Firstly, we found that the Y:S ratio-containing (25% yeast and 75% sucrose) could result in a maximum fecundity of B. dorsalis. Then, after assessing the literature (Moadeli et al. 2017), we developed a gel larval diet for B. dorsalis by adding a gelling agent (agar) to our diets. The present gel larval diet has overcome some disadvantages of previous solid and liquid diet of B. dorsalis, and 20-g/L yeast gel diet allowed a higher pupal weight, pupal production, adult emergence, and shorter development than the both previous solid and liquid diet, and thus can be seen as a potential media for a large-scale mass-rearing of B. dorsalis. Although this study was conducted at a small-scale in the lab, we believed that the data obtained provide important reference information for the large-scale factory rearing of B. dorsalis to be applied in SIT-based methods.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the earmarked fund for the Modern Agroindustry (Citrus) Technology Research System of China (Grant No. CARS-27) and a grant from Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (cstc2017shmszx-xdny0031). We thank Lesley Benyon, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

References Cited

  1. Ali M. W., Zheng W., Sohail S., Li Q., Zheng W., and Zhang H.. . 2017. A genetically enhanced sterile insect technique against the fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) by feeding adult double-stranded RNAs. Sci. Rep. 7: 4063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aluja M., Jácome I., and Macíasordóñez R.. . 2001. Effect of adult nutrition on male sexual performance in four neotropical fruit fly species of the Genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Beha. 14: 759–775. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anato F. M., Bokonon-Ganta A. H., Gnanvossou D., Hanna R., and Chang C. L.. . 2017. Assessment of a liquid larval diet for rearing Dacus species and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 141: 860–865. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aquino J. C. D., Souza C. F. C., Santos J. R. D. J., and Joachimbravo I. S.. . 2016. Adding guarana powder to medfly diets: an alternative for improving the Sterile Insect Technique. Sci. Agric. 73: 294–298. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blay S. and Yuval B.. . 1997. Nutritional correlates of reproductive success of male Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Anim. Behav. 54: 59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caro P., Gomez J., Sanchez I., Naudi A., Ayala V., López-Torres M., Pamplona R., and Barja G.. . 2009. Forty percent methionine restriction decreases mitochondrial oxygen radical production and leak at complex I during forward electron flow and lowers oxidative damage to proteins and mitochondrial DNA in rat kidney and brain mitochondria. Rejuvenation Res. 12: 421–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan H. T., Hansen J. D., and Tam S. Y. T.. . 1990. Larval diets from different protein sources for mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 1954–1958. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang C. L. 2004. Effect of amino acids on larvae and adults of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 529–535. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang C. L. 2009. Fruit fly liquid larval diet technology transfer and update. J. Appl. Entomol. 133:164–173. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang C. L. 2017. Laboratory evaluation on a potential birth control diet for fruit fly sterile insect technique (SIT). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 140: 42–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang C. L., Caceres C., and Jang E. B.. . 2004. A novel liquid larval diet and its rearing system for melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 524–528. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang C. L., Vargas R. I., Caceres C., Jang E., and Cho I. K.. . 2006. Development and assessment of a liquid larval diet for Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 99: 1191–1198. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen E. H., Wei D., Wei D. D., Yuan G. R., and Wang J. J.. . 2013. The effect of dietary restriction on longevity, fecundity, and antioxidant responses in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Physiol. 59: 1008–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen E. H., Hou Q. L., Wei D. D., Jiang H. B., and Wang J. J.. . 2017. Phenotypes, antioxidant responses, and gene expression changes accompanying a sugar-only diet in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 17: 194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chippindale A. K., Leroi A. M., Kim S. B., and Rose M. R.. . 1993. Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life-history evolution.1. nutrition and the cost of reproduction. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 171–193. [Google Scholar]
  16. Christenson L. D., Maeda S., and Holloway J. R.. . 1956. Substitution of dehydrated for fresh carrots in medium for rearing fruit flies. J. Econ. Entomol. 49: 135–136. [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarke A. R., Armstrong K. F., Carmichael A. E., Milne J. R., Raghu S., Roderick G. K., and Yeates D. K.. . 2005. Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50: 293–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Davies S., Kattel R., Bhatia B., Petherwick A., and Chapman T.. . 2005. The effect of diet, sex and mating status on longevity in Mediterranean fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata), Diptera: Tephritidae. Exp. Gerontol. 40: 784–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Geib S. M., Calla B., Hall B., Hou S., and Manoukis N. C.. . 2014. Characterizing the developmental transcriptome of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) through comparative genomic analysis with Drosophila melanogaster utilizing modENCODE datasets. BMC Genomics. 15: 942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerald F., Antigone Z., Carlos C., Schetelig M. F., and Wimmer E. A.. . 2009. Conditional embryonic lethality to improve the sterile insect technique in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Biol. 7: 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goane L., Pereyra P. M., Castro F., Ruiz M. J., Juárez M. L., Segura D. F., and Vera M. T.. . 2019. Yeast derivatives and wheat germ in the adult diet modulates fecundity in a tephritid pest. Bull. Entomol. Res. 109: 178–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hanife G. 2008. Modified agar-based diet for small scale laboratory rearing of olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 91: 651–656. [Google Scholar]
  23. Henderson W. E., and Kinnersley A. M.. . 1988. Corn starch as an alternative gelling agent for plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 15: 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hou Q. L., Chen E. H., Jiang H. B., Wei D. D., Gui S. H., Wang J. J., and Smagghe G.. . 2017. Adipokinetic hormone receptor gene identification and its role in triacylglycerol mobilization and sexual behavior in the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 90: 1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jain R., Anjaiah V., and Babbar S. B.. . 2005. Guar gum: a cheap substitute for agar in microbial culture media. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 41: 345–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jessup A. J., Dominiak B., Woods B., Lima C. P. F. D., Tomkins A., and Smallridge C. J.. . 2007. Area-wide management of fruit flies in Australia. Springer, The Netherlands: pp. 685–697. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jin T., Zeng L., Lin Y., Lu Y., and Liang G.. . 2011. Insecticide resistance of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in mainland China. Pest Manag. Sci. 67: 370–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaspi R., Mossinson S., Drezner T., Kamensky B., and Yuval B.. . 2002. Effects of larval diet on development rates and reproductive maturation of male and female Mediterranean fruit flies. Physiol. Entomol. 27: 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  29. Khan M. 2013. Potential of liquid larval diets for mass rearing of queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Aust. J. Entomol. 52: 268–276. [Google Scholar]
  30. Knipling E. F. 1955. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J. Econ. Entomol. 48: 459–462. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lapointe S. L., Evens T. J., and Niedz R. P.. . 2008. Insect diets as mixtures: optimization for a polyphagous weevil. J. Insect Physiol. 54: 1157–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee K. P., Simpson S. J., Clissold F. J., Brooks R., Ballard J. W., Taylor P. W., Soran N., and Raubenheimer D.. . 2008. Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: new insights from nutritional geometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 2498–2503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ling C. C. 2009. Evaluation of yeasts and yeast products in larval and adult diets for the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, and adult diets for the Medfly, Ceratitis capitata, and the Melon Fly, Bactrocera curcurbitae. J. Insect Sci. 9: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ling C. L., Kurashima R., and Albrecht C.. . 2000. Effect of limiting concentrations of growth factors in mass rearing diets for Ceratitis capitata larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 898–903. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ling C. L., Caceres C., and Ekesi S.. . 2007. Life history parameters of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared on liquid diets. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 100: 900–906. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lu K., Chen X., Liu W. T., Zhang X. Y., Chen M. X., and Zhou Q.. . 2016. Nutritional signaling regulates vitellogenin synthesis and egg development through juvenile hormone in Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17: 269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Martingronert M. S., Tarryadkins J. L., Cripps R. L., Chen J. H., and Ozanne S. E.. . 2008. Maternal protein restriction leads to early life alterations in the expression of key molecules involved in the aging process in rat offspring. Am. J. Physiol-REG. I. 294: R494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Matavelli C., Carvalho M. J., Martins N. E., and Mirth C. K.. . 2015. Differences in larval nutritional requirements and female oviposition preference reflect the order of fruit colonization of Zaprionus indianus and Drosophila simulans. J. Insect Physiol. 82: 66–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moadeli T., Mainali B., Ponton F., and Taylor P. W.. . 2018a. Effects of wheat germ oil concentration in gel larval diets on production and quality of queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 111: 2288–2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moadeli T., Mainali B., Ponton F., and Taylor P. W.. . 2018b. Evaluation of yeasts in gel larval diet for Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni. J. Appl. Entomol. 142: 679–688. [Google Scholar]
  41. Moadeli T., Taylor P. W., and Ponton F.. . 2017. High productivity gel diets for rearing of Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni. J. Pest. Sci. 90: 507–520. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mohamed S. A., Khamis F. M., and Tanga C. M.. . 2016. Fruit fly nutrition, rearing and quality control. In Ekesi S., Mohamed S. and De Meyer M.. (eds.), Fruit Fly Research and Development in Africa-Towards a Sustainable Management Strategy to Improve Horticulture (pp. 207–233). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mohanty P., Ghanim H., Hamouda W., Aljada A., Garg R., and Dandona P.. . 2002. Both lipid and protein intakes stimulate increased generation of reactive oxygen species by polymorphonuclear leukocytes and mononuclear cells. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 75: 767–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nestel D., Nemny-Lavy E., and Chang C. L.. . 2004. Lipid and protein loads in pupating larvae and emerging adults as affected by the composition of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) meridic larval diets. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 56: 97–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pascacio-Villafán C., Williams T., Sivinski J., Birke A., and Aluja M.. . 2015. Costly nutritious diets do not necessarily translate into better performance of artificially reared fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 108: 53–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pascacio-Villafán C., Williams T., Birke A., and Aluja M.. . 2016. Nutritional and non-nutritional food components modulate phenotypic variation but not physiological trade-offs in an insect. Sci. Rep. 6: 29413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pascacio-Villafán C., Birke A., Williams T., and Aluja M.. . 2017. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of insect rearing on artificial diets: a test with a tephritid fly used in the sterile insect technique. PLoS One. 12: e0173205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pascacio-Villafán C., Guillén L., Williams T., and Aluja M.. . 2018. Effects of larval density and support substrate in liquid diet on productivity and quality of artificially reared Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 111: 2281–2287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pašková M. 2007. New larval agar-based diet for laboratory rearing of Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae). Biologia. 62: 477–481. [Google Scholar]
  50. Piper M. D. W., and Partridge L.. . 2007. Dietary restriction in Drosophila: delayed aging or experimental artefact? PLoS Genet. 3: e57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rohlfs M., and Hoffmeister T. S.. . 2005. Maternal effects increase survival probability in Drosophila subobscura larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 117: 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sánchez‐Rosario M., Pérez‐Staples D., Toledo J., Valle‐Mora J., and Liedo P.. . 2017. Artificial selection on mating competitiveness of Anastrepha ludens for sterile insect technique application. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 162: 133–147. [Google Scholar]
  53. Schroeder W. J., Miyabara R. Y., Tanaka N., and Chambers D. L.. . 1971. A fluid larval medium for rearing the melon fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 1221–1223. [Google Scholar]
  54. Schultzhaus J. N., and Carney G. E.. . 2017. Dietary protein content alters both male and female contributions to Drosophila melanogaster female post-mating response traits. J. Insect Physiol. 99: 101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sentinella A. T., Crean A. J., and Bonduriansky R.. . 2013. Dietary protein mediates a trade‐off between larval survival and the development of male secondary sexual traits. Funct. Ecol. 27: 1134–1144. [Google Scholar]
  56. Skorupa D. A., Dervisefendic A., Zwiener J., and Pletcher S. D.. . 2008. Dietary composition specifies consumption, obesity and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell. 7: 478–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Smykal V., and Raikhel A. S.. . 2015. Nutritional control of insect reproduction. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 11: 31–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Telang A., and Wells M. A.. . 2004. The effect of larval and adult nutrition on successful autogenous egg production by a mosquito. J. Insect Physiol. 50: 677–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Vera M. T., Oviedo A., Abraham S., Ruiz M. J., Mendoza M., Chang C. L., and Willink E.. . 2014. Development of a larval diet for the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 34: S73–S81. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wan X., Nardi F., Zhang B., and Liu Y.. . 2011. The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, in China: origin and gradual inland range expansion associated with population growth. PLoS One. 6: e25238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wan X., Liu Y., and Zhang B.. . 2012. Invasion history of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, in the Pacific-Asia region: two main invasion routes. PLoS One. 7: e36176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao J., Chen S., Deng Y., He R., Ma J., Liang F., and Hu. M.. 2013. Sperm precedence pattern and the effect of irradiation on male mating competition in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Cell Bio. 1: 1–5. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Insect Science are provided here courtesy of University of Wisconsin Libraries

RESOURCES