Abstract
The RhoA/ROCK-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics have been implicated in adipogenesis. The two ROCK isoforms, ROCK1 and ROCK2, are highly homologous. The contribution of ROCK2 to adipogenesis in vivo has not been elucidated. The present study aimed at the in vivo and in vitro roles of ROCK2 in the regulation of adipogenesis and the development of obesity. We performed molecular, histological and metabolic analyses in ROCK2+/− and ROCK2+/KD mouse models, the latter harboring an allele with a kinase-dead (KD) mutation. Both ROCK2+/− and ROCK2+/KD mouse models showed a lean body mass phenotype during aging, associated with increased amounts of beige cells in subcutaneous white adipose tissue (sWAT) and increased thermogenic gene expression in all fat depots. ROCK2+/− mice on a high-fat diet showed increased energy expenditure accompanying by reduced obesity, and improved insulin sensitivity. In vitro differentiated ROCK2+/− stromal-vascular (SV) cells revealed increased beige adipogenesis associated with increased thermogenic gene expressions. Treatment with a selective ROCK2 inhibitor, KD025, to inhibit ROCK2 activity in differentiated SV cells reproduced the pro-beige phenotype of ROCK2+/− SV cells. In conclusion, ROCK2 activity-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics contribute to the inhibition of beige adipogenesis in WAT, and also promotes age-related and diet-induced fat mass gain and insulin resistance.
Keywords: Beige adipogenesis, energy expenditure, obesity, ROCK2, ROCK2-selective inhibitor
Introduction
Obesity is a major risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular complications (1–3). In 2016, 39% of the world population aged 18 years and over is either overweight or obese (3), and obesity is now one of the most serious concerns to public health. Exploring the pathogeneses involved in the development of obesity and developing novel methods to block excessive body adipose tissue expansion can make a significant impact on public health, for example reducing obesity associated metabolic disorders.
ROCKs are central regulators of the actin cytoskeleton downstream of the small GTPase RhoA (4–6). The two ROCK isoforms, ROCK1 and ROCK2, are highly homologous with 92% amino acid sequence identity in the kinase domain and an overall identity of 65% (4–6). Up-regulated ROCK activity has been involved in the pathogenesis of all aspects of metabolic syndrome including obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and hypertension (7–10). Studies using ROCK inhibitors in animal models including obesity, diabetes, and associated complications have demonstrated numerous benefits (7, 11, 12). However, because most ROCK inhibitors in these studies are non-isoform selective, systemic treatment results in smooth muscle relaxation and may cause a rapid and obvious drop in blood pressure. The side effects have obviously hampered ROCK inhibition as a novel treatment (13, 14). Isoform-selective inhibition, particularly by a ROCK2 inhibitor that is being currently tested in several clinical trials for non-metabolic diseases showing no major side effects, is emerging as an important breakthrough for systemic treatment (15–17). It thus becomes fundamentally and translationally important to define the functions of ROCK2 in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases including obesity and insulin resistance.
Genetic approaches have revealed pleiotropic actions of ROCKs in regulating insulin signaling and obesity, the outcome is depending on ROCK isoforms and metabolic organs (8, 18–23). To investigate the direct roles of ROCKs in adipose tissues, ROCK1 was specifically deleted from adipocytes in mice, which showed modest amelioration of insulin sensitivity and insulin signaling, but no significant effects were detected on adipocyte hypertrophy and inflammation under a high-fat diet (HFD) (8), suggesting that the ROCK2 isoform in adipose tissue may play a dominant role in controlling insulin sensitivity and adiposity. Indeed, a partial deletion of ROCK2 in mice on a CD-1 background results in reduced adipocyte hypertrophy associated with reduced production of inflammatory cytokines and insulin resistance (21). Therefore in vitro (24) and in vivo (7, 8, 21) studies have shown a consistent observation and demonstrated the contributory roles of ROCK2 and RhoA/ROCK activation in adipocytes to the development of insulin resistance. Nevertheless, the role of ROCK2 in adipogenesis and adiposity in vivo remains unexplored. ROCK2 deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) show enhanced adipogenesis in vitro (24), consistent with other reports indicating that suppression of RhoA/ROCK activity enhances adipocyte differentiation (25–27). However, increased adipogenesis has not been reported in partial ROCK2 deficient mice (21) and in transgenic mice expressing adipocyte-specific dominant-negative RhoA mutant (7). A well-defined role and the underlying mechanism of ROCK2 in adipogenesis need to be elucidated in greater detail. It is important to reconcile the anti-adipogenic roles of ROCK2 supported by using in vitro adipogenesis models with its contributory roles to the development of insulin resistance and obesity observed in vivo.
White adipose tissue (WAT) is a main site to store energy in the form of fat, and it is also an important endocrine organ for maintaining metabolic homeostasis (28), whereas brown adipose tissue (BAT) is thermogenic and able to convert glucose and fatty acids to heat, thereby increase energy expenditure. BAT is mainly found in interscapulum in mouse and characterized by constitutively expression of high levels of thermogenic genes, notably uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1), a mitochondrial uncoupling protein (29). UCP1 mediates heat generation in brown adipocytes by uncoupling respiratory chain, and thereby manipulating a fast substrate oxidation without efficient ATP production. In addition, clusters of ‘brown-like’ adipocytes develop in WAT in response to various activators including cold exposure and β-adrenergic stimulation, these cells are also known as UCP1 positive cells or beige cells; it is worthy to note that increased cell activities in either brown or beige adipocytes have been linked to obesity resistance which were reported in numerous studies involving mouse models (28, 30–32) and human (33–38). The new discovery mentioned above suggests that boosting the formation and activation of brown and beige adipocytes holds great promise in metabolic disease therapy.
Increased evidence supports that actin cytoskeleton remodeling plays an important role in brown/beige adipogenesis (31, 39, 40), while the contribution of ROCK isoforms in vivo has never been elucidated. In this study, we investigated in vivo and in vitro roles of ROCK2 in beige adipogenesis, obesity and insulin resistance using both ROCK2+/− and ROCK2+/KD mouse models, the latter harboring a ROCK2 allele with a kinase-dead (KD) mutation.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture medium and supplement.
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12), DMEM, HBSS buffer, Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium-Sodium Pyruvate (ITS-A), 0.4% trypan blue were from Gibco, penicillin/streptomycin mixture (P/S) was from HyClone, fetal bovine serum (FBS) from Atlanta Biologicals, collagenase type II from Worthington Biochemical, indomethacin from Alfa Aesar, D(+)-Biotin from ACROS Organics, 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine (IBMX) from Tocris Bioscience, rosiglitazone from AdipoGen Life Science, KD025 (also called SLx-2119) from Apexbio Technology, Y27632 from Millipore-Sigma, Chamber slide for immunocytochemistry from Lab-tek, cell culture dishes and multi-well cell culture plates were purchased from Fisher Scientific.
Experimental mice.
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Indiana University School of Medicine. Generation of ROCK2+/− mice on an FVB background was as previously described (41). Deletion of exon 2 in ROCK2 gene results in a frame-shift mutation, removing all residues from the residue 47 to the end of the protein. ROCK1+/KD (Fig. S5) and ROCK2+/KD (Fig. 5) mice, harboring a ROCK1 or ROCK2 allele with a KD point-mutation, have been generated in the C57BL/6 background by Merck Research Laboratories (available through Taconic; Rock1 - Model 12904 - PM; Rock2 - Model 12979 - PM). Lysine105 in ROCK1 (Fig. S5A) or Lysine121 in ROCK2 (Fig. 5A), required for ATP binding, has been replaced with Alanine in ROCK1- or ROCK2-KD knockin allele. All animals were housed at 26–28°C with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle and ad libitum access to water and standard pelleted chow (Teklad 2018 SX with 6.2% kcal from fat, Envirgo) or HFD (D12492 with 60% kcal from fat, Research Diets Inc.).
Body composition and food intake.
Mice were weighed at weaning (3 weeks) and weekly thereafter. Total fat and lean mass were assessed using EchoMRI 4in1–500 (EchoMRI). Epididymal WAT (eWAT), inguinal subcutaneous WAT (sWAT), BAT, gastrocnemius muscle, liver and heart were harvested, weighed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for later analysis. To quantitate daily food intake, male and female mice (at 5 month of age) were individually housed, food intake was measured over a 30-day period. To quantitate food intake during HFD feeding, daily food intake was checked over the first 14 days, the time point for mice in two groups to show significant body weight difference.
Blood analyses.
Whole blood was collected from caudal vein of experimental mice; serum was prepared and stored in −80°C freezer until use. Insulin (80-INSMR-CH01), leptin (MOB00), adiponectin (EZMADP-60k) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) (M6000B) were analyzed with The SpectraMax iD5 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA); alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (AL3875), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (AS3876) total cholesterol (CH3810), triglyceride (TR3823), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (CH3811), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (CH3841) levels were measured with automated clinical chemistry analyzer (The Randox RX Daytona platform). For instant measurement of whole blood total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, LDL, the Cholestech LDX Analyzer (Alere) was used.
Glucose and insulin tolerance tests.
All experimental mice were allowed to acclimate to the laboratory environment before study. In the glucose-tolerance tests (GTT), mice were fasted overnight and caudal vein blood glucose was measured using AlphaTrak glucometer immediately before and 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after an intraperitoneal injection of glucose (2.0 g/kg of body weight). In the insulin-tolerance tests (ITT), mice were fasted for 5 h beginning in the morning of experimental day and caudal vein blood was used for glucose level measurement immediately before and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after an intraperitoneal injection of human insulin (0.75 U/kg of lean body mass; Humulin R, Lilly). Area under the curve was calculated using the trapezoidal rule (18).
Energy expenditure.
Energy expenditure was measured by assessing oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production with indirect calorimetry. Individually housed mice were studied, using the cages of TSE systems (Lab Master Metabolic Research Platform). Mice were acclimated in the TSE System cages for 24 h before data collection and had free access to food and water for the duration of the study. Daily oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, heat production, locomotor activity and food intake were measured and calculated from the mean of 2 days’ values. The respiratory exchange rate (RER) was calculated as the volume of CO2 versus volume of O2 (VCO2/VO2) ratio. All data were normalized to lean body mass.
Histology and quantitative analysis.
Visceral WAT, inguinal WAT and liver were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (4% PFD), embedded in paraffin, sectioned with Leica DM5500B microscope and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) (Fisher Scientific). Ten representative digital images were taken with a 20× objective from four different sections per animal. Average adipocyte areas of 100–200 cells per animal (4 mice per group) were measured with Image-Pro software (Media Cybernetics). For immunocytochemistry staining, cells were fixed in 4% PFD for 20 min at room temperature, followed by incubation in permeable/block buffer (5% normal goat serum and 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS) for 30 min, then sequential incubation with primary antibodies (UCP1 at 1:500 or p-MLC at 1:50 dilution at 4°C, overnight) and detected with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution, 1 h at room temperature). Staining for F-actin was with R-415 Rhodamine Phalloidin (1:30 dilution) and for nuclear with Hoechst 33342 (20 mM) (Invitrogen). The fluorescent images were taken with Leica DM5500B microscope (objectives: HCX PL FUOTAR 20.0 × 0.50, HCX PL FUOTAR 40 × 0.75) equipped with a DFC300FXR2 camera, and images were analyzed with the Leica AF6000 software.
Protein analyses.
Protein samples were prepared as previously described (18, 42–46). Fat pads, liver, gastrocnemius muscle and ventricular tissue fragments were disrupted with a PYREX® Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder on ice in lysis buffer containing proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 x g at 4°C for 15 minutes, and the supernatant was saved for immunoblotting. The blots were probed with primary antibodies to ROCK1 (#sc-5560), ROCK2 (#sc-5561), focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (#sc-558) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; ROCK1 (#4035), adiponectin (#2789), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) (#3676), cytochrome C oxidase subunit IV (COX IV) (#4844), cytochrome C (#4272), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) (#8178), fatty acid synthase (FAS) (#3180), perilipin (#9349), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) (#2443), cofilin (#3312), p-cofilin-Ser3 (#3311), p-FAK-Tyr925 (#3284), myosin light chain (MLC) (#3672), p-MLC-Ser19 (#3671), myosin-binding subunit of myosin phosphatase (MYPT) (#2643) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology; preadipocyte factor 1 (Pref 1) (#AB3511), p-MLC-Ser19 (#AB3381) and p-MYPT-Thr696 (#ABS45) were from MilliporeSigma; UCP1 (#ab10983) from Abcam; p-ROCK2-Ser1366 from GeneTex (GTX122651). All blots were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (#ABS16) or actin (#MABT523) obtained from MilliporeSigma.
Insulin signaling analysis.
Insulin signaling studies were performed on mice following overnight fasting as previously performed (8, 18). eWAT, sWAT, BAT, gastrocnemius muscle, liver and heart were harvested 10 min after intraperitoneal injection of human insulin (10 U/kg of body weight), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until analysis. Western blot analyses with tissue homogenates were performed with primary antibodies to insulin receptor (IRβ) (#3025), p-IRS1-S632/635 (#2388), Akt (#9272), p-Akt-Ser473 (#9271), and p-Akt-Thr308 (#9275) from Cell Signaling Technology; AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (#07–350), and p-AMPK-Thr172 (#07–681) from MilliporeSigma; p-IRS1-Tyr612 (#44816) and p-IR-Tyr1162/1163 (#44–804) from Invitrogen.
Gene expression analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from eWAT, sWAT, and BAT by using TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen). To assess mRNA transcript levels by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), cDNA was synthesized with High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit, TaqMan primers and probes for mouse GAPDH, ROCK1, ROCK2 are from Applied Biosystems; UCP1, PPARγ, elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 3 (Elovl3), cytochrome C oxidase subunit 8b (COX8b), Resistin, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-α (PGC-1α) were from Integrated DNA Technologies. Gene expression was detected with iTq universal SYBR Green in CFX Real-Time PCR Systems from Bio-Rad.
Gene Name | Sequence-F | Sequence-R |
---|---|---|
UCP1 | GCATTCAGAGGCAAATCAGC | GCCACACCTCCAGTCATTAAG |
COX8b | GAACCATGAAGCCAACGACT | GCGAAGTTCACAGTGGTTCC |
Resistin | CTGTCCAGTCTATCCTTGCACAC | CAGAAGGCACAGCAGTCTTGA |
Elovl3 | TCCGCGTTCTCATGTAGGTCT | GGACCTGATGCAACCCTATGA |
PGC-1α | CACCAAACCCACAGAAAACAG | GGGTCAGAGGAAGAGATAAAGTTG |
PPARγ | TTTTCCGAAGAACCATCCGATT | ATGGCATTGTGAGACATCCCC |
GAPDH | GTGGAGTCATACTGGAACATGTAG | AATGGTGAAGGTCGGTGTG |
Mouse stromal vascular (SV) cells isolation.
WT and ROCK2 gene mutated mice at age 6–8 weeks old were used to prepare SV cells. Before dissecting, the fur of selected mice was disinfected with 70% ethanol spray. All following procedures were performed in an aseptic environment and tissue operations were performed carefully on ice unless indicated otherwise. The isolated fat deposit was placed immediately in a sterile culture dish and weighed in order to determine the volume of digestion buffer (100 mg tissue/400 ul of digestion buffer). The fat deposit was minced quickly in 0.2% collagenase type II in HBSS; minced tissue was then transferred into sterile conic tubes, and further shredded by pipetting up and down with a 5 ml pipette. The enzymatic digestion was carried out at 37°C with constant agitation at 150 rpm for a period of 25–30 min with observations to avoid over-digestion. Tissue homogenate was centrifuged at 700 × g for 10 min at 5°C, the pellet was then re-suspended in DMEM medium and undigested tissue chucks were cleaned by filtration through Corning sterile 40 – 70 μm cell strainers (Fisher Scientific). The cells were collected by centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 min at 5°C in an Allegra 6R centrifuge and were suspended in complete growth medium. The purified SV cells were seeded in culture dishes and maintained at sub-confluence in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S at 37°C till 95% cell confluence. For all subsequent experiments, the SV cells with passage number between 1 and 3 were used.
Induction of SV cells differentiation and maintenance.
To induce differentiation, SV cells were cultured in differentiation medium cocktail: DMEM/F-12 with 4% FBS, 10 μg/ml insulin, transferrin 5.5 ug/ml, selenite 6.7 ng/ml, 0.25 mM IBMX, 1 uM dexamethasone, 0.2 mM indomethacin, and 33 μM biotin. The induction period lasted for 48 hours followed by maintaining differentiated cells in medial cocktail: DMEM-F12 (1:1) with 4% FBS, 1 x ITS-A, 0.5 uM dexamethasone, 0.2 mM indomethacin, and 33 μM Biotin. For a subset of experiments, in order to enhance adipogenesis, 0.5 μM rosiglitazone was added. Each specific treatment schedule and drug concentration are indicated in text or figures. In general, the SV cells completed maturation and differentiated to adipocytes in 9 days of our experimental condition. The desired treatment was applied as indicated in text. Cells were collected for protein or RNA analysis as described previously (41, 47); immunocytochemistry analysis was as described previously (41, 47).
Oil Red O (ORO) staining.
ORO (Alfa Aesar) staining is for visualizing accumulated lipid content in cytoplasm of adipocytes. Cell growth in 6-well plates was used for staining. Briefly, ORO was dissolved in isopropanol (3 mg/ml) and diluted with water (3:2 v/v of ORO stock solution and water) before staining. Cells were rinsed once with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) after culture medium was removed and fixed cells in 10% formalin/PBS for 1 hour at RT. Cells were again rinsed with PBS and then 60% isopropanol. Filtered ORO solution (6:4 v/v of stock solution and water) was added and incubated for 15 min at RT. Cells were counter stain with 0.2% trypan blue for 8 min and finally clear background with water.
Statistical analysis.
For cell culture data, all experiments were performed more than three times independently, a representative one was displayed, and all results were presented as means ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Mouse experiments were performed in biological triplicate with at least 4 mice/group for gene/protein expression analyses, with at least 6 mice/group for morphometric and metabolic studies, and all results were expressed as means ± SEM. Comparisons between two groups were performed by Student’s t-tests using Excel software. For multiple comparisons, one-way or two-way ANOVA was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software. For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
ROCK2 plays a more important role than ROCK1 in controlling adiposity during the aging process.
ROCK2+/− mice on an FVB background showed reduced body weight (Fig. 1A) and WAT mass (Fig. 1C; Fig. S1A, B) at middle age (10–15 months), compared to WT mice. No significant differences were observed in the amount of food intake (Fig. 1B), or in major organ weights between ROCK2+/− and WT groups (Fig. 1D). On the other hand, no significant difference in body weight (Fig. 1A) or WAT mass (Fig. S1C) was observed between ROCK1+/− and WT mice, supporting that ROCK2 plays a more important role than ROCK1 in controlling adiposity. Moreover, the fasted serum triglyceride levels were lower in ROCK2+/− mice (Fig. 1E), but not in ROCK1+/− mice (Fig. S1D). Meanwhile, smaller size of adipocytes was confirmed in eWAT of ROCK2+/− mice (Fig. 2A, B). Although there were no significant differences in fasting blood insulin and glucose (Fig. 1G, H) between ROCK2+/− and WT groups at 12 months of age, GTT (Fig. 1J) and ITT (Fig. 1L) revealed improved insulin sensitivity in ROCK2+/− mice, and the improved GTT and ITT remained at 15 months of age in ROCK2+/− mice. In addition, ROCK2+/− mice showed an early onset improvement in GTT (Fig. 1I) and ITT (Fig. 1K) at 3 months of age prior to the differences in body weight becoming significant at 10 months of age. Moreover, the improvement of ITT in ROCK2+/− mice was more remarkable at 12 months of age than at 3 months of age (Fig. 1K, L), suggesting that age-related improvement of ITT in ROCK2+/− mice is connected with the reduced WAT mass.
Partial ROCK2 deletion increases expression of brown adipocyte-selective genes in fat depots.
Brown adipocytes contain multilocular lipid droplets and a high content of mitochondria characterized by uniquely high expression of UCP1 (29). Protein analysis showed increased UCP1, PPARγ, and cytochrome C levels in BAT compared to eWAT and sWAT (Fig. S2A). The levels of common adipocyte markers such as perilipin, ACC, and FAS were similar across fat depots (Fig. S2A). Brown-like or beige adipocytes were also observed interspersed within WAT, particularly enriched in sWAT (Fig. 2C). ROCK2 and total ROCK activity, revealed by p-ROCK2-Ser1366 and/or p-MLC-Ser19 levels, were lowest in BAT and lower in sWAT relative to eWAT (Fig. S2B); there is therefore an inverse relationship between ROCK2 or total ROCK activity and the abundance of brown/beige adipocytes in fat depots. In addition, both ROCK1 and ROCK2 mRNA levels in sWAT were increased during the aging process, but the increased expression ROCK2 gene was higher (Fig. 2D), suggesting that ROCK2 is more likely contributing to suppressing beige adipogenesis.
To determine if ROCK2 is involved in brown/beige cell adipogenesis, we next examined the abundance of multilocular beige adipocytes in sWAT of ROCK2+/− mice and also quantitated the adipogenesis markers in BAT and WAT including sWAT and eWAT (Fig. 2E, F). ROCK2+/− mice at 12 months, compared to WT mice of the same age, exhibited increased multilocular beige adipocytes in sWAT (Fig. 2C) corresponding to increased UCP1, PPARγ, and cytochrome C protein levels, but no significant changes in perilipin (Fig. 2E, F). In addition, the mRNA levels of thermogenic genes including UCP1, Elovl3, and Cox8b were elevated in ROCK2+/− fat depots at 3 months of age (Fig. 2G), indicating that increased thermogenic gene expression in ROCK2+/− fat depots occurs prior to the body weight becoming significantly different at 10 months of age, and likely contributes to the age-dependent lean mass phenotype. Together, these results support a role of ROCK2 in suppressing beige adipogenesis in WAT and in suppressing the thermogenic gene program in both BAT and WAT.
β-adrenergic stimulation has been known for enhancing beige adipocyte formation in sWAT, however, the interplay between ROCK and beige adipocyte formation has never been elucidated in detail, specifically in the context of ROCK isoform. We next examined how ROCK2+/− sWAT responded to the β3-adrenergic agonist, CL316,243 (Fig. 2H–K). Mice were treated at 1 mg/kg body weight for 10 days. In both ROCK2+/− and WT sWAT, RhoA and ROCK2 levels, and total ROCK activity indicated by p-MLC levels were reduced, but ROCK1 levels were unchanged (Fig. 2H, I; Fig. S2C, D). Due to partial ROCK2 deletion, ROCK2 levels and total ROCK activity (p-MLC levels) were lower in ROCK2+/− sWAT, and were further decreased upon CL316,243 treatment relative to WT sWAT (Fig. 2H, I). Parallel to the reduced ROCK2 expression and total ROCK activity, CL316,243 treatment increased the abundance of beige adipocytes (Fig. 2J, K) and the protein levels of thermogenic genes including UCP1 and cytochrome C (Fig. 2H, I) to a greater extent in ROCK2+/− sWAT than in WT sWAT, supporting that the ROCK2+/− sWAT are more sensitive than the WT sWAT to CL316,243 treatment.
Partial ROCK2 deletion reduces HFD-induced obesity and insulin resistance.
To determine if partial ROCK2 deletion affects the development of adiposity, ROCK2+/− mice were fed with HFD for 14 weeks starting from 3 months of age (Fig. 3, Fig. S3). The body weight gain was significantly less in male ROCK2+/− mice compared to WT mice after two weeks on HFD (Fig. 3A) while food intake was similar between two groups during 14-week HFD (Fig. 3B, Fig. S3E), and this phenotype has been persistent during the following observation. The WAT mass was significantly less in ROCK2+/− mice as measured by EchoMRI after 6 weeks on HFD and by morphometric analysis at the end of diet treatment (Fig. 3C). Moreover, the liver mass was significantly less in ROCK2+/− mice (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, body weight, WAT mass and liver mass were reduced in female ROCK2+/− mice fed with HFD for 14 weeks (Fig. S3A–D), indicating that ROCK2+/− mice are protected against HFD-induced obesity.
Besides, the fasting serum cholesterol (Fig. 3F), HDL (Fig. 3G), leptin (Fig. 3H) and IL-6 (Fig. 3I) levels were lower while serum adiponectin levels (Fig. 3J) were higher in ROCK2+/− mice suggesting reduced adipocyte hypertrophy and inflammatory cytokine production in ROCK2+/− mice. Interestingly, fasting blood glucose (Fig. 3K) and insulin (Fig. 3L) between ROCK2+/− and WT groups did not show significant differences, but both GTT (Fig. 3O) and ITT (Fig. 3P) revealed improved whole body insulin sensitivity in ROCK2+/− mice. Finally, liver function in ROCK2+/− mice was better than the WT mice as revealed by lower serum ALT (Fig. 3M) and AST (Fig. 3N) levels that are consistent with reduced liver mass (Fig. 3D). In addition, histological analysis revealed reduced hepatic steatosis in ROCK2+/− mice (Fig. 3Q). Additional protein analysis with liver homogenates did not show reduced total ROCK activity (p-MLC and p-cofilin levels) in ROCK2+/− liver (Fig. 3R), suggesting that ROCK2 may not be a major contributor of ROCK activity in liver. As there was no significant differences in metabolic signaling molecules (PPARγ, p-AMPK, ACC, cytochrome C) between ROCK2+/− and WT liver (Fig. 3R), the reduced hepatic steatosis in ROCK2+/− mice is likely attributed to the reduced serum lipid levels (Fig. 3F, G).
β-adrenergic stimulation with CL316,243 significantly reduced body weight in WT mice fed a HFD, but not in ROCK2+/− mice fed a HFD (Fig. 4A). Body composition analysis revealed that CL316,243 treatment decreased eWAT and sWAT mass in WT mice (Fig. 4B) consistent with increased beige adipocyte formation and activity by β-adrenergic stimulation. In ROCK2+/− mice, CL316,243 treatment increased sWAT and BAT mass while decreasing eWAT mass (Fig. 4B), supporting that the sWAT and BAT of ROCK2+/− mice are more sensitive to CL316,243 stimulation and as the result, beige and brown adipocyte formation and activity are increased compared to WT mice.
Metabolic cage analysis following 8 weeks of HFD feeding demonstrated that there was a trend of increased O2 consumption and heat production in ROCK2+/− mice compared to the WT mice; it was about 5% increase during the dark cycle, and the light cycle, or the whole 24-h period (Fig. 4C, D). However, the differences became significant after 10 days of CL316,243 treatment; it was about 5% increase during the light cycle, 15% during the dark cycle, or 10% for the 24-h period (Fig. 4C, D). On the other hand, there were no significant difference in RER (Fig. 4E), locomotor activity (Fig. 4F) and food intake between two groups (Fig. 4G). Body temperature appeared to be elevated in the ROCK2+/− group at both baseline and in response to CL316,243 treatment, but the differences were not statistically significant (Figure S3F). The results suggest that higher energy expenditure occurred in ROCK2+/− mice. Our observation that CL316,243 treatment increasing the differences of energy expenditure between the two groups is also consistent with the increased sWAT and BAT mass in ROCK2+/− mice upon the treatment (Fig. 4B).
Histological and molecular analyses showed that ROCK2+/− mice under HFD also exhibited increased multilocular beige adipocytes in sWAT (Fig. S4A) associated with increased thermogenic gene mRNA levels (UCP1, Cox8b, and PGC-1α) and reduced TNFα mRNA levels (Fig. S4B) indicating increased beige adipogenesis and reduced inflammation in ROCK2+/− sWAT. In addition, protein analysis showed increased UCP1, PPARγ and cytochrome C protein levels in ROCK2+/− sWAT and BAT, and increased PPARγ and cytochrome C protein levels in ROCK2+/− eWAT, but no significant changes in perilipin among these fat depots between ROCK2+/− and WT mice (Fig. S4C, D). CL316,243 treatment increased the protein expression levels of thermogenic genes including UCP1 and COX IV to a greater extent in ROCK2+/− sWAT than in WT sWAT under HFD (Fig. 4H). Therefore, partial ROCK2 deletion stimulated beige adipogenesis in WAT and activated a thermogenic gene program in both BAT and WAT under both HFD feeding (Fig. S4; Fig. 4H) and the aging process (Fig. 2).
Insulin signaling pathway analysis revealed significant increases in p-AKT-Ser473, p-AKT-Thr308 and p-IRS1-Tyr612 levels upon insulin stimulation in the eWAT of ROCK2+/− mice compared to that of WT mice, but p-IR-Tyr1162/1163 level among the two groups of mice was similar and p-IRS1-Ser632/635 level was reduced in the eWAT of ROCK2+/− mice (Fig. S4E–G), indicating increased signaling effects downstream of IR activation in the ROCK2+/− eWAT. Interestingly, insulin stimulated p-AKT-Ser473 and p-AKT-Thr308 levels were similar in the sWAT of ROCK2+/− and WT mice (Fig. S4E, F), suggesting that increased beige adipogenesis in the ROCK2+/− sWAT is independent of the response to insulin. Together, these results demonstrates that partial ROCK2 deletion reduces diet-induced obesity and inflammation, increases thermogenic gene program activity in fat depots, and improved WAT and whole body insulin sensitivity.
Inactivating ROCK2 kinase activity reproduces the lean body mass phenotype of partial ROCK2 deletion.
ROCK2 isoform deletion removes both kinase-dependent and independent functions of the ROCK2 protein. To examine the contribution of ROCK2 kinase activity to the age-related fat mass gain, we have extended the study to ROCK2+/KD mice (Fig. 5). The ROCK2KD allele has recently been generated in the C57BL/6 background by homologous recombination (Fig. 5A). To validate the ROCK2KD allele, we first tested if ROCK2KD/KD mice are embryonic lethal because homozygous ROCK2 knockout mice are embryonic lethal with placenta dysfunction (~80% penetrance) (48, 49). When the heterozygous ROCK2KD/+ mice were intercrossed (>30 crosses), we were unable to obtain any viable ROCK2KD/KD mice at weaning age, therefore we have functionally validated this ROCK2KD allele during development. In the metabolic study, ROCK2+/KD mice reproduced the lean body phenotype of ROCK2+/− mice during aging (Fig. 5B) showing reduced body weight (Fig. 5C) and WAT mass (Fig. 5D). The KD point mutation has no detectable effect on ROCK2 protein expression which differs from gene ablation, as ROCK2 expression level was not reduced in sWAT and BAT from ROCK2+/KD mice (Fig. 5E, F), but active ROCK2 levels measured by Western blot of p-ROCK2-Ser1366 were reduced by ~50% (Fig. 5E, F). In addition, p-ROCK2 levels were also reduced by ~50% in other tissues of ROCK2+/KD mice including eWAT, skeletal muscle, liver, heart and lung without affecting the ROCK2 protein expression (unpublished results). Moreover, reduced total ROCK activity (p-MLC levels) was also observed in the sWAT and BAT of ROCK2+/KD mice compared to WT mice. Agreeably with the lean body mass, ROCK2+/KD mice exhibited increased UCP1 and cytochrome C protein levels in sWAT and BAT compared to WT mice (Fig. 5E, F), reproducing characteristics of ROCK2 hemizygous mice.
In addition to ROCK2+/KD mice, we have characterized ROCK1+/KD mice (Fig. S5A), in which ROCK1 kinase activity was reduced in heart homogenates without affecting ROCK1 protein expression levels (Fig. S5B). Additional protein analysis did not show reduced total ROCK activity (p-MLC levels) in ROCK1+/KD sWAT and BAT (Fig. S5C), suggesting that ROCK1 is unlikely a major contributor of ROCK activity in fat depots. Similarly to the ROCK1+/− mice (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1C), ROCK1+/KD mice did not show reduced body weight and fat mass at 12 months of age (Fig. 5C), and did not exhibit increased UCP1 and cytochrome C protein levels in sWAT and BAT compared to WT mice (Fig. S5C). Together, these results further support that ROCK2 plays a more critical role than ROCK1 in regulating body weight, fat mass and beige adipogenesis.
Partial ROCK2 deletion enhances in vitro beige adipogenesis.
Because ROCK2+/− mice are systemic heterozygous knockout mice, a key question is whether ROCK2 represses beige and brown adipogenesis directly. To address this question, confluent primary SV cells isolated from sWAT of WT and ROCK2+/− mice were differentiated in vitro by giving signal for differentiation orientation. The cell morphology (Fig. 6A) and protein levels of white and brown adipogenesis markers were examined at day 6 (Fig. 6B, C; Fig. S6A) before reaching maximal levels of differentiation, which occur after day 8. As expected, differentiated SV cells from WT mice showed reduced RhoA protein levels and reduced total ROCK activity (p-MLC and p-cofilin levels) relative to undifferentiated SV cells, accompanied with increased expressions of both common (PPARγ, C/EBPα, perilipin, ACC, FAS) and beige adipocyte (UCP1, cytochrome C, COX IV) markers (Fig. 6A, B). Differentiated ROCK2+/− SV cells exhibited smaller lipid droplets compared to the WT cells (Fig. 6A), accompanied with reduced ROCK2 expression and total ROCK activity (p-MLC and p-cofilin levels) (Fig. 6B, C), and increased beige adipogenesis markers (UCP1, cytochrome C, COX IV) and adipogenic transcription factors (PPARγ, C/EBPα). On the other hand, differentiated ROCK2+/− SV cells exhibited similar levels of common adipocyte markers, perilipin, ACC and FAS compared to WT cells (Fig. 6B, C). The enhanced beige adipogenesis observed in differentiated ROCK2+/− SV cells support a direct action for ROCK2 in suppressing beige adipogenesis.
ROCK2-selective inhibitor (KD025) treatment reduces lipid droplet sizes and increases thermogenic gene expression in differentiated SV cells.
KD025 is a commercially available ROCK2 selective inhibitor, the IC50 of this compound was 24 μM for ROCK1 and 0.105 μM for ROCK2 using the recombinant human ROCK1 and ROCK2 proteins (15). We first validated the ROCK2 isoform selectivity of KD025 using ROCK1 or ROCK2 deficient MEF (Fig. S7). KD025 at 10 μM, which is 95-fold of the IC50 value of ROCK2, but only 0.42-fold of the IC50 value of ROCK1, disrupts actin cytoskeleton in ROCK1−/− (only ROCK2 present), but not in ROCK2−/− MEFs (absent of ROCK2) and WT MEFs (ROCK1 is able to maintain stress fibers when ROCK2 is inhibited) (Fig. S7A). In addition, phosphorylation of MLC is reduced in KD025 treated WT and ROCK1−/− cells (ROCK2 presents in both MEFs) but not in ROCK2−/− cells (absent of ROCK2) (Fig. S7B). These results confirm the isoform selectivity of KD025 at 10 μM in cultured cells. Furthermore, the dose curve analysis indicates that KD025 effectively inhibits ROCK2 activity as shown by reduced p-MLC, p-cofilin and p-FAK levels at 5 to 20 μM concentration range in ROCK1−/− cells (Fig. S7C).
The preliminary study above defines the conditions for testing effects of KD025 in in vitro adipocyte differentiation experiments in which 4 μM of KD025 was used to minimize cytotoxicity while inhibiting ROCK2 activity effectively (Fig. 7). KD025 treatment of confluent primary SV cells reduced endogenous ROCK2 activity and total ROCK activity as indicated by reduced p-ROCK2, p-MLC and p-cofilin levels (Fig. 7A) and reduced central stress fiber formation accompanied by perinuclear re-localization of p-MLC, which mainly associates with central stress fibers in untreated SV cells (Fig. 7B). In addition, KD025 treatment (during the last two days of differentiation) of WT, but not ROCK2+/−, differentiated SV cells reduced the size of lipid droplet (Fig. 7C), indicating that KD025 treatment reproduced the effects of partial ROCK2 deletion in reducing droplet size. In addition, partial ROCK2 deletion abolished the effects of KD025 (Fig. 7C), supporting the effects of KD025 in reducing the size of lipid droplet are mediated through inhibiting ROCK2.
KD025 treatment increased protein levels of UCP1 and cytochrome C in WT SV cells (Fig. 7D). The pro-beige adipogenic effects of KD025 were further enhanced by co-treatment with rosiglitazone (0.5 μM), a PPARγ agonist knowing to increase both white and beige adipogenesis (Fig. 7D). Different from the differentiated ROCK2+/− SV cells (Fig. 6B, C), KD025 treatment reduced perilipin protein levels (Fig. 7D), suggesting inhibition of white adipogenesis by KD025 treatment. In addition, the dose curve analysis showed that KD025 at 0.5 μM, a concentration without significant inhibitory effects on ROCK2 activity (p-ROCK2 levels), effectively inhibited perilipin protein expression (Fig. 7E), suggesting that this anti-adipogenic action of KD025 is not mediated through ROCK2 inhibition. On the other hand, increased UCP1 and cytochrome C expressions could be detected with KD025 treatment at 4 μM, but not at lower concentrations (Fig. 7E), suggesting that KD025 promotes beige adipogenesis through ROCK2 inhibition. In addition, a time course analsyis indicated that in differentiated SV cells, increases in UCP1 and cytochrome C levels could be observed after one day of KD025 treament at 4 μM without signifciant effects on perilipin levels, which decreased during longer treatment period, e.g. from two days of KD025 treatment (Fig. S8A). Consistent with the increased UCP1 levels measured by western blot analysis, fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed increased UCP1 staining in differentiated WT SV cells after one day of KD025 treament at 4 μM (Fig. S8B). Therefore, both dose course and time course analyses dissociated the pro-beige adipogenic effects of KD025 from its anti-adipogenic effects. Moreover, in agreement with the ROCK2 inhibition mediated pro-beige adipogenic effect, the increases in UCP1 and cytochrome C levels were not detected in KD025-treated ROCK2+/− SV cells (Fig. S8C). Together, the results indicate that KD025 at optimal concentration can inhibit ROCK2 activity, reduce the size of lipid droplet and increases beige adipocyte markers only in WT SV cells but not in ROCK2+/− SV cells. To confirm that the anti-adipogenic effect of KD025 is independent of inhibition of ROCK activity, we treated WT SV cells with Y27632, which inhibits both ROCK1 and ROCK2 (Fig. S7A). Dose curve analysis showed differences between KD025 and Y27632 inhibitions; non-isoform inhibition with Y27632 at 1 to 5 μM increased perilipin levels, therefore promoting adipogenesis (Fig. S8D). Interestingly, Y27632 at 5 μM, not in 1 uM, increased UCP1 and cytochrome C levels (Fig. S8D) indicating that beige adipogenesis rather than white adipogenesis requires efficient disruption of actin cytoskeleton. Together, the results obtained with the cultured SV cells support a model presented in Fig. 8A, in which ROCK2 inhibition, via partial ROCK2 deletion or KD025 treatment (e.g. appropriate concentrations and time frames), facilitates disruption of actin filaments induced by adipogenic factors (see Materials and Methods), and enhances the activation of PPARγ and C/EBPα upon adipogenic induction, resulting in improved beige adipogenesis.
Discussion
The present study revealed a novel role of ROCK2 in promoting the thermogenic program in WAT and BAT through both genetic and chemical inhibition approaches and in both animal and cell culture experimental models. Importantly, our finding has demonstrated the contribution of ROCK2 activity to age-related fat mass gain and insulin resistance and to HFD-induced obesity and insulin resistance; therefore we have established the role of ROCK2 contributing to obesity and obesity-caused metabolic disease. The most interesting findings in both ROCK2+/− and ROCK2+/KD mice include: both models exhibiting a lean body mass phenotype during aging when compared to the WT littermates; increased amounts of beige adipocytes in sWAT and augmented thermogenic gene expression in fat depots including eWAT, sWAT and BAT; increased abundance of beige cells and thermogenic gene expression in ROCK2+/− mice on HFD; increased sensitivity to β-adrenergic stimulation associated with higher energy expenditure in ROCK2+/− mice; reduced obesity and insulin resistance. Besides the above in vivo findings, an in vitro adipogenesis study on ROCK2+/− SV cells has revealed enhanced beige adipogenesis as demonstrated by reduced ROCK activity, reduced the size of lipid droplet and increased thermogenic gene expression. The treatment of differentiated WT SV cells with a ROCK2-selective inhibitor KD025 reproduced the pro-beige adipogenic phenotype of ROCK2+/− SV cells. The current study supports the potential therapeutic values of ROCK2-selective inhibitors for the treatment of obesity and insulin resistance.
ROCK2 possesses a preferential role versus ROCK1 in controlling beige adipogenesis; we observed that ROCK2 shows a superior role versus ROCK1 in controlling actin cytoskeleton dynamics in fat depots (ROCK2+/− versus ROCK1+/− mice in Fig. 1 and Fig. S1, ROCK2+/KD versus ROCK1+/KD mice (Fig. 5; Fig. S5). Although previous studies support a negative role of RhoA and ROCK activity in adipogenesis (24–27), a role for this signaling pathway in beige adipogenesis has not been revealed. We indeed found direct evidence to show the role of RhoA and ROCK on adipogenesis in vivo, notably in beige adipogenesis. The previously reported genetic manipulations modulate RhoA and ROCK activity either through the upstream regulators (p190-B RhoGAP, RhoGAP DLC1, PDZ-RhoGEF) (25, 26, 39, 50) or downstream mediators [myocardin related transcription factor A (MRTF-A), Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ)] (31, 51, 52). The general concept is that RhoA and ROCK activity suppress adipogenesis, which is attributed to acto-myosin generated tension preventing cell shape changes during the differentiation process (24–27). In addition, increased actin stress fiber formation facilitates nuclear translocation of MRTF-A, which is a transcriptional cofactor of serum response factor leading to increased actin cytoskeleton gene expression and decreased PPARγ activity (27). Moreover, RhoA/ROCK-mediated actin cytoskeleton formation also promotes nuclear translocation of transcription factors YAP and TAZ, which promote osteogenesis and suppress adipogenesis (51). Because cell shape change is facilitated by disruption of the actin cytoskeleton, this disruption is required for all white, brown and beige adipocyte differentiation (52); some recent studies indicated that the inhibition of RhoA and ROCK-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics is required for all three types of adipogenesis (31, 39, 40). Our observations in this study provide direct support for a negative role of ROCK2 activity in beige adipogenesis in vivo and in vitro, accordingly linking ROCK2 with previously known RhoA/ROCK upstream and downstream signaling pathways; we therefore further recognize the important metabolic impacts of ROCK2 in obesity. The other result noteworthy is that we found an inverse relationship between ROCK2 activity (and total ROCK activity) and the abundance of brown/beige adipocytes in fat depots (Fig. 2; Fig. S2), further supports the notion that ROCK2 activity inhibits beige adipogenesis through promoting actin cytoskeleton dynamics.
It is also worth noting that in the previous studies involving the genetic manipulations of RhoA and ROCK, the effects on adipogenesis have not been reported in the partial ROCK2 deficient mice (21), in transgenic mice expressing adipocyte-specific dominant-negative RhoA mutant (7) or in transgenic mice systemically expressing a dominant-negative ROCK mutant inhibiting both ROCK isoforms (12) as these studies are mainly focused on the role of RhoA and ROCK in adipocyte hypertrophy of visceral WAT, insulin resistance and inflammation. Consistent with these studies, we observed that partial ROCK2 deletion is beneficial to amended insulin sensitivity under standard diet at both young (3 months) and middle ages (12 months) (Fig. 1) or under HFD (Fig. 3). An important observation in the current study is that the improved insulin sensitivity measured by ITT in the partial ROCK2 knockout mice at the 3 months of age (Fig. 1K) was further improved at 12 months (Figure 1L), the same beneficial effect was kept when the two mouse groups were challenged with HFD diet (Fig. 3P). In either situation above the reduced WAT gain could be observed in the partial ROCK2 knockout mice (Fig. 1C; Fig. 3C). As the results showed that the insulin sensitivity was improved, we next analyzed insulin signaling molecules and the most noticeable is seen in the eWAT under HFD diet (Fig. S4); supporting that reduced WAT mass in the partial ROCK2 knockout mice most likely contributes to the reduced systemic age-related or diet-related insulin resistance. The results are consistent with a recent study reporting that ROCK activity in rat visceral WAT is important in the development of age-related insulin resistance (53).
An interesting finding in our study is the lean body phenotype observed in the partial ROCK2 knockout mice fed either standard diet during aging or HFD for 14 weeks. This observation differs from recent studies in which partial ROCK2 knockout mice in CD-1 background showed no significant effects on diet-induced body weight gain (20, 21), but showed improved insulin sensitivity under HFD. The discrepancy might be attributed to strain-dependent variations in obesity and glucose homeostasis (54) or to the differences in the experimental time frames. But, in both FVB (ROCK2+/−) (Fig. S1A) and C57BL/6 (ROCK2+/KD) (Fig. 5B) background, we have observed the lean body mass phenotype with reduced ROCK2 expression or activity during aging, thus further validating the role for ROCK2 activity in adiposity. In addition to fat depots, the liver is also one of the major metabolic organs; thereby the liver may also contribute to the energy expenditure, obesity and insulin sensitivity. We analyzed the liver function and molecules in ROCK2+/− mice; the results showed a reduced hepatic steatosis under HFD (Fig. 3Q) associated with reduced serum ALT (Fig. 3M) and AST (Fig. 3N) levels added onto the benefits of reduced obesity and insulin resistance. A previous report showed that systemically transgenic expression of a dominant-negative ROCK mutant that inhibits both ROCK isoforms increased energy expenditure, reduced diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance through the activation of AMPK in the skeletal muscle and liver (12). However, the contribution of this AMPK-dependent mechanism in liver and skeletal muscle may not play a significant role in the lean body phenotype of ROCK2+/− mice, because we didn’t observe an increased AMPK activation (measured by p-AMPK levels) in the liver (Fig. 3R) and skeletal muscle (unpublished results) of ROCK2+/− mice fed HFD, and there were no significant differences in metabolic signaling molecules (PPARγ, p-AMPK, ACC, cytochrome C) between ROCK2+/− and WT liver (Fig. 3R). In addition, the liver weight was not increased in the ROCK2+/− mice during aging (Fig. 1D), despite of reduced fat mass and improved insulin sensitivity under this condition. Our results support the notion that partial ROCK2 deletion in fat depots mainly contributes to the lean phenotype and improved systemic insulin sensitivity of ROCK2+/− mice, and the reduced hepatic steatosis under HFD may be secondary to the reduced serum lipid levels and improved systemic insulin sensitivity. Future studies with conditional ROCK2 deletion in adipose tissue, liver and skeletal muscle are warranted for further validating the metabolic roles of ROCK2 in these tissues.
The underlying mechanisms for ROCK2 inhibiting beige adipogenesis and impairing insulin sensitivity appear to be diverse (Fig. 8). The former involves the ROCK2-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics as discussed above (Fig. 8A) and the latter relies on the direct phosphorylation of IRS1 by ROCK2 (Fig. 8B). The relationship between ROCK activity and IRS1 phosphorylation has been documented in various cell types and organs including fat tissues (7, 11, 12, 20, 21, 24, 55–57). It is widely believed that serine phosphorylation of IRS1 by ROCK activity in WAT and vascular cells (11, 20, 21, 24, 55) leads to reduced IRS1-mediated PI3K activation, resulting in decreased insulin sensitivity (Fig. 8B). However, ROCK-mediated IRS1 phosphorylation can also positively impact on insulin signaling such as in skeletal muscle and in cultured adipocytes and muscle cells (18, 19, 56, 57). Therefore, the exact mechanism for ROCK-mediated insulin resistance is not clear yet and multiple crosstalk of ROCK and insulin signaling pathway can occur depending on the cell and tissue context (10). It is also noted that ROCK2-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics and insulin signaling can be inter-regulated, therefore the intention to dissociate these two mechanisms is difficult. On one hand, improved insulin signaling observed in the ROCK2 deficient MEFs was linked to increased adipogenesis (24); in contrast, the changes in actin dynamics of ROCK1 deficient MEFs could be linked to improved insulin signaling through increased IR activation (8). It is thus possible that the improved insulin sensitivity in the partial ROCK2 knockout fat tissues may contribute to the enhanced beige adipogenesis. However, our results showed that partial ROCK2 deletion had no significant improvement on insulin signaling in sWAT despite evidence of significantly enhanced beige cell formation, suggesting that the enhanced beige adipogenesis is independent of the effects of partial ROCK2 deletion on insulin signaling. Our results support the model presented in Figure 8B: firstly, ROCK2 activity inhibits beige adipogenesis in sWAT and suppresses the thermogenic gene expressions in all fat depots leading to reduced energy expenditure and increased age-related or diet-induced fat mass gain, specifically the visceral fat mass; secondly, a direct negative action of ROCK2 on insulin signaling; together, age-related or diet-induced insulin resistance is manifest.
Formation of beige adipocytes in WAT could arise by recruiting beige progenitors from perivascular mural cells (58) or from trans-differentiation of mature white adipocytes (59, 60). We have noticed that the expression level of Pref1, a pre-adipocyte marker, was similar between WT and ROCK2+/− mice in all fat depots and in cultured primary SV cells (unpublished results) suggesting that ROCK2 may not be involved in the recruitment of progenitors and the expansion of pre-adipocytes. In addition, inhibition of ROCK2 with KD025 for 2 days after terminal differentiation of SV cells isolated from WT sWAT was able to recapitulate the cellular phenotype of ROCK2+/− SV cells, including reduced lipid droplet sizes and increased thermogenic gene expressions (Fig. 7C), raising the possibility that inhibition of ROCK2 could promote trans-differentiation of mature white adipocytes to beige adipocytes under baseline and stimulated conditions (β-adrenergic agonist or PPARγ agonist). Our results also support the notion that the differentiation process of beige and white adipocytes involves down-regulation of RhoA expression and activity by various adipogenic inducers, the latter may suppress actin cytoskeleton formation and acto-myosin contraction. Additional inhibition by ROCK2-selective inhibitor can further reduce total ROCK activity and promotes the adipogenic differentiation towards to beige adipocytes (Fig. 8A).
KD025, published in 2008, is the first highly selective ROCK2-isoform inhibitor (15). Because the hypotensive phenotype that commonly occurred with ROCK pan-inhibitors was not observed when KD025 tested in systemic application (16), it has been emerging as an important breakthrough in systemic application. Indeed, its therapeutic potential has been explored in fibrotic disease (15), focal cerebral ischemia (16, 61, 62) and auto-immune disease (17, 63–66). In addition to the pro-beige adipogenic action of KD025, we have noticed an anti-adipogenic action of KD025 as reflected by reduced perilipin levels in the drug treated SV cells (Fig. 7D, E). Importantly, both dose- and time-dependent analyses (Fig. 7E; Fig. S8A) helped to dissociate the pro-beige adipogenic (mediated by ROCK2 inhibition) and anti-adipogenic (targets are not clear) actions of KD025. Our observations share some similarities with a recent report indicating that treatment of 3T3-L1 cell line with KD025 inhibits adipogenesis, and this anti-adipogenic effect of KD025 is partially independent of ROCK activity (67). However, we have noticed some differences between our study in SV cells with the reported study in 3T3-L1 cells: 1) KD025 treatment reduced total ROCK activity reflected by reduced p-MLC and p-cofilin levels in SV cells, but not 3T3-L1 cells; 2) KD025 treatment disrupted actin cytoskeleton in SV cells, but not 3T3-L1 cells; 3) KD025 reduced adipogenesis on terminally differentiated SV cells, but not on terminally differentiated 3T3-L1 cells; 4) the effects on beige adipogenesis were not examined in 3T3-L1 cells. Further studies are warranted to identify other molecular targets for KD025 implicated in adipogenesis, and to examine if this inhibitor protects against the development of obesity in vivo through enhanced beige adipogenesis (through ROCK2 inhibition) and/or reduced white adipogenesis (possibly through other targets).
In conclusion, our study has revealed a preferential role for ROCK2 over ROCK1 in controlling the thermogenic program in fat depots and age-related or diet-induced fat mass gain, and supports the notion that ROCK2 is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity and insulin resistance. ROCK2 activity-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics contribute to the inhibition of beige adipogenesis in WAT and the thermogenic program activity in WAT and BAT. The combined direct action on insulin signaling and an inhibitory effect on adipogenesis by ROCK2 activity promote age-related or diet-induced insulin resistance. Our in vitro study in SV cells with ROCK2-selective inhibitor KD025 has demonstrated a pro-beige adipogenesis action through reducing ROCK2 activity and strongly supports our future investigation to explore the therapeutic potential for the treatment of metabolic diseases including obesity and insulin resistance.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the Islet and Physiology Core and the Translation Core at Indiana University School of Medicine Center for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases for their assistance in performing rodent metabolic characterization. We thank Summer Research Interns Maleeka Shrestha, Stephanie Shi, Swati Pant and Dalton Engle for technical help. ROCK1+/KD and ROCK2+/KD mice were generated in the C57BL/6 background by Merck Research Laboratories (available through Taconic; Rock1 - Model 12904 - PM; Rock2 - Model 12979 - PM).
This work was supported by Biomedical Research Grant of Indiana University School of Medicine 2286128 (to J.S.) awarded from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (funded in part by grant #UL1 TR001108 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences) and by the Pilot Funding for Research Use of Core Facilities 2286118 (to J.S.) awarded from the Diabetes Center Core Facilities supported by National Institutes of Health grant P30 DK097512 (to Dr. Raghu G. Mirmira). This work was also supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants HL107537 and HL134599 (to L.W.), and the Riley Children’s Foundation (to L.W. and J.S.).
Non-standard Abbreviations:
- ACC
acetyl-CoA carboxylase
- ALT
alanine aminotransferase
- AMPK
AMP-activated protein kinase
- AST
aspartate aminotransferase
- BAT
brown adipose tissue
- C/EBPα
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α
- Cox8b
cytochrome C oxidase subunit 8b
- COX IV
cytochrome C oxidase subunit IV
- DMEM
Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium
- Elovl3
elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 3
- FAK
focal adhesion kinase
- FAS
fatty acid synthase
- FBS
fetal bovine serum
- GAPDH
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- GTT
glucose-tolerance tests
- HDL
high-density lipoprotein
- H&E
hematoxylin-eosin
- HFD
high-fat diet
- IBMX
1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine
- IL-6
interleukin 6
- IR
insulin receptor
- IRS1
insulin receptor substrate 1
- ITS-A
insulin-transferrin-selenium-sodium pyruvate
- ITT
insulin-tolerance tests
- KD
kinase-dead
- LDL
low-density lipoprotein
- MEF
mouse embryonic fibroblasts
- MLC
myosin light chain
- MYPT
myosin-binding subunit of myosin phosphatase
- ORO
Oil Red O
- PBS
phosphate buffer saline
- PGC-1α
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-α
- PFD
paraformaldehyde
- PPARγ
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ
- Pref1
preadipocyte factor 1
- P/S
penicillin/streptomycin mixture
- RER
respiratory exchange ratio
- RT-qPCR
real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
- SV
stromal vascular
- TNFα
tumor necrosis factor α
- UCP1
uncoupling protein 1
- WAT
white adipose tissue
- eWAT
epididymal WAT
- sWAT
subcutaneous WAT
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Inoue Y, Qin B, Poti J, Sokol R, and Gordon-Larsen P (2018) Epidemiology of Obesity in Adults: Latest Trends. Curr Obes Rep 7, 276–288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O’Neill S, and O’Driscoll L (2015) Metabolic syndrome: a closer look at the growing epidemic and its associated pathologies. Obes Rev 16, 1–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Organization., W. H. (2019) Fact sheet: obesity and overweight. [WWW document] URL http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html
- 4.Matsui T, Amano M, Yamamoto T, Chihara K, Nakafuku M, Ito M, Nakano T, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, and Kaibuchi K (1996) Rho-associated kinase, a novel serine/threonine kinase, as a putative target for small GTP binding protein Rho. EMBO J 15, 2208–2216 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ishizaki T, Maekawa M, Fujisawa K, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Fujita A, Watanabe N, Saito Y, Kakizuka A, Morii N, and Narumiya S (1996) The small GTP-binding protein Rho binds to and activates a 160 kDa Ser/Thr protein kinase homologous to myotonic dystrophy kinase. EMBO J 15, 1885–1893 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nakagawa O, Fujisawa K, Ishizaki T, Saito Y, Nakao K, and Narumiya S (1996) ROCK-I and ROCK-II, two isoforms of Rho-associated coiled-coil forming protein serine/threonine kinase in mice. FEBS Lett 392, 189–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hara Y, Wakino S, Tanabe Y, Saito M, Tokuyama H, Washida N, Tatematsu S, Yoshioka K, Homma K, Hasegawa K, Minakuchi H, Fujimura K, Hosoya K, Hayashi K, Nakayama K, and Itoh H (2011) Rho and Rho-kinase activity in adipocytes contributes to a vicious cycle in obesity that may involve mechanical stretch. Sci Signal 4, ra3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee SH, Huang H, Choi K, Lee DH, Shi J, Liu T, Chun KH, Seo JA, Lima IS, Zabolotny JM, Wei L, and Kim YB (2014) ROCK1 isoform-specific deletion reveals a role for diet-induced insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 306, E332–343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu L, Tan L, Lai J, Li S, and Wang DW (2016) Enhanced Rho-kinase activity: Pathophysiological relevance in type 2 diabetes. Clin Chim Acta 462, 107–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jahani V, Kavousi A, Mehri S, and Karimi G (2018) Rho kinase, a potential target in the treatment of metabolic syndrome. Biomed Pharmacother 106, 1024–1030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kanda T, Wakino S, Homma K, Yoshioka K, Tatematsu S, Hasegawa K, Takamatsu I, Sugano N, Hayashi K, and Saruta T (2006) Rho-kinase as a molecular target for insulin resistance and hypertension. FASEB J 20, 169–171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Noda K, Nakajima S, Godo S, Saito H, Ikeda S, Shimizu T, Enkhjargal B, Fukumoto Y, Tsukita S, Yamada T, Katagiri H, and Shimokawa H (2014) Rho-kinase inhibition ameliorates metabolic disorders through activation of AMPK pathway in mice. PloS One 9, e110446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Feng Y, LoGrasso PV, Defert O, and Li R (2016) Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitors and Their Therapeutic Potential. J Med Chem 59, 2269–2300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Defert O, and Boland S (2017) Rho kinase inhibitors: a patent review (2014 – 2016). Expert Opin Ther Pat 27 507–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boerma M, Fu Q, Wang J, Loose DS, Bartolozzi A, Ellis JL, McGonigle S, Paradise E, Sweetnam P, Fink LM, Vozenin-Brotons MC, and Hauer-Jensen M (2008) Comparative gene expression profiling in three primary human cell lines after treatment with a novel inhibitor of Rho kinase or atorvastatin. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 19, 709–718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee JH, Zheng Y, von Bornstadt D, Wei Y, Balcioglu A, Daneshmand A, Yalcin N, Yu E, Herisson F, Atalay YB, Kim MH, Ahn YJ, Balkaya M, Sweetnam P, Schueller O, Poyurovsky MV, Kim HH, Lo EH, Furie KL, and Ayata C (2014) Selective ROCK2 Inhibition In Focal Cerebral Ischemia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 1, 2–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zanin-Zhorov A, Weiss JM, Nyuydzefe MS, Chen W, Scher JU, Mo R, Depoil D, Rao N, Liu B, Wei J, Lucas S, Koslow M, Roche M, Schueller O, Weiss S, Poyurovsky MV, Tonra J, Hippen KL, Dustin ML, Blazar BR, Liu CJ, and Waksal SD (2014) Selective oral ROCK2 inhibitor down-regulates IL-21 and IL-17 secretion in human T cells via STAT3-dependent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 16814–16819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee DH, Shi J, Jeoung NH, Kim MS, Zabolotny JM, Lee SW, White MF, Wei L, and Kim YB (2009) Targeted disruption of ROCK1 causes insulin resistance in vivo. J Biol Chem 284, 11776–11780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chun KH, Choi KD, Lee DH, Jung Y, Henry RR, Ciaraldi TP, and Kim YB (2011) In vivo activation of ROCK1 by insulin is impaired in skeletal muscle of humans with type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 300, E536–542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Soliman H, Nyamandi V, Garcia-Patino M, Varela JN, Bankar G, Lin G, Jia Z, and MacLeod KM (2015) Partial deletion of ROCK2 protects mice from high-fat diet-induced cardiac insulin resistance and contractile dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 309, H70–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Soliman H, Varela JN, Nyamandi V, Garcia-Patino M, Lin G, Bankar GR, Jia Z, and MacLeod KM (2016) Attenuation of obesity-induced insulin resistance in mice with heterozygous deletion of ROCK2. Int J Obes (Lond) 40, 1435–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou X, Li R, Liu X, Wang L, Hui P, Chan L, Saha PK, and Hu Z (2016) ROCK1 reduces mitochondrial content and irisin production in muscle suppressing adipocyte browning and impairing insulin sensitivity. Sci Rep 6, 29669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang H, Lee SH, Sousa-Lima I, Kim SS, Hwang WM, Dagon Y, Yang WM, Cho S, Kang MC, Seo JA, Shibata M, Cho H, Belew GD, Bhin J, Desai BN, Ryu MJ, Shong M, Li P, Meng H, Chung BH, Hwang D, Kim MS, Park KS, Macedo P, White M, Jones J, and Kim YB (2018) Rho kinase/AMPK axis regulates hepatic lipogenesis during overnutrition. J Clin Invest 128 5335–5350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Noguchi M, Hosoda K, Fujikura J, Fujimoto M, Iwakura H, Tomita T, Ishii T, Arai N, Hirata M, Ebihara K, Masuzaki H, Itoh H, Narumiya S, and Nakao K (2007) Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of Rho-associated kinase II enhances adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 282, 29574–29583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sordella R, Jiang W, Chen GC, Curto M, and Settleman J (2003) Modulation of Rho GTPase signaling regulates a switch between adipogenesis and myogenesis. Cell 113, 147–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, and Chen CS (2004) Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6, 483–495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nobusue H, Onishi N, Shimizu T, Sugihara E, Oki Y, Sumikawa Y, Chiyoda T, Akashi K, Saya H, and Kano K (2014) Regulation of MKL1 via actin cytoskeleton dynamics drives adipocyte differentiation. Nat Commun 5, 3368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harms M, and Seale P (2013) Brown and beige fat: development, function and therapeutic potential. Nat Med 19, 1252–1263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nedergaard J, Ricquier D, and Kozak LP (2005) Uncoupling proteins: current status and therapeutic prospects. EMBO Rep 6, 917–921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Seale P, Conroe HM, Estall J, Kajimura S, Frontini A, Ishibashi J, Cohen P, Cinti S, and Spiegelman BM (2011) Prdm16 determines the thermogenic program of subcutaneous white adipose tissue in mice. J Clin Invest 121, 96–105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McDonald ME, Li C, Bian H, Smith BD, Layne MD, and Farmer SR (2015) Myocardin-related transcription factor A regulates conversion of progenitors to beige adipocytes. Cell 160, 105–118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yadav H, Quijano C, Kamaraju AK, Gavrilova O, Malek R, Chen W, Zerfas P, Zhigang D, Wright EC, Stuelten C, Sun P, Lonning S, Skarulis M, Sumner AE, Finkel T, and Rane SG (2011) Protection from obesity and diabetes by blockade of TGF-beta/Smad3 signaling. Cell Metab 14, 67–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cypess AM, Lehman S, Williams G, Tal I, Rodman D, Goldfine AB, Kuo FC, Palmer EL, Tseng YH, Doria A, Kolodny GM, and Kahn CR (2009) Identification and importance of brown adipose tissue in adult humans. N Engl J Med 360, 1509–1517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Saito M, Okamatsu-Ogura Y, Matsushita M, Watanabe K, Yoneshiro T, Nio-Kobayashi J, Iwanaga T, Miyagawa M, Kameya T, Nakada K, Kawai Y, and Tsujisaki M (2009) High incidence of metabolically active brown adipose tissue in healthy adult humans: effects of cold exposure and adiposity. Diabetes 58, 1526–1531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Vanhommerig JW, Smulders NM, Drossaerts JM, Kemerink GJ, Bouvy ND, Schrauwen P, and Teule GJ (2009) Cold-activated brown adipose tissue in healthy men. New N Engl J Med 360, 1500–1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yoneshiro T, Aita S, Matsushita M, Kayahara T, Kameya T, Kawai Y, Iwanaga T, and Saito M (2013) Recruited brown adipose tissue as an antiobesity agent in humans. J Clin Invest 123, 3404–3408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cypess AM, Weiner LS, Roberts-Toler C, Franquet Elia E, Kessler SH, Kahn PA, English J, Chatman K, Trauger SA, Doria A, and Kolodny GM (2015) Activation of human brown adipose tissue by a beta3-adrenergic receptor agonist. Cell Metab 21, 33–38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Betz MJ, and Enerback S (2015) Human Brown Adipose Tissue: What We Have Learned So Far. Diabetes 64, 2352–2360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sim CK, Kim SY, Brunmeir R, Zhang Q, Li H, Dharmasegaran D, Leong C, Lim YY, Han W, and Xu F (2017) Regulation of white and brown adipocyte differentiation by RhoGAP DLC1. PloS One 12, e0174761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dorn T, Kornherr J, Parrotta EI, Zawada D, Ayetey H, Santamaria G, Iop L, Mastantuono E, Sinnecker D, Goedel A, Dirschinger RJ, My I, Laue S, Bozoglu T, Baarlink C, Ziegler T, Graf E, Hinkel R, Cuda G, Kaab S, Grace AA, Grosse R, Kupatt C, Meitinger T, Smith AG, Laugwitz KL, and Moretti A (2018) Interplay of cell-cell contacts and RhoA/MRTF-A signaling regulates cardiomyocyte identity. EMBO J 37, e98133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shi J, Wu X, Surma M, Vemula S, Zhang L, Yang Y, Kapur R, and Wei L (2013) Distinct roles for ROCK1 and ROCK2 in the regulation of cell detachment. Cell death & disease 4, e483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shi J, Zhang L, Zhang YW, Surma M, Mark Payne R, and Wei L (2012) Downregulation of doxorubicin-induced myocardial apoptosis accompanies postnatal heart maturation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302, H1603–1613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shi J, Zhang YW, Summers LJ, Dorn GW 2nd, and Wei L (2008) Disruption of ROCK1 gene attenuates cardiac dilation and improves contractile function in pathological cardiac hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 44, 551–560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shi J, Zhang YW, Yang Y, Zhang L, and Wei L (2010) ROCK1 plays an essential role in the transition from cardiac hypertrophy to failure in mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol 49, 819–828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shi J, Surma M, and Wei L (2018) Disruption of ROCK1 gene restores autophagic flux and mitigates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Oncotarget 9, 12995–13008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shi J, Surma M, Yang Y, and Wei L (2019) Disruption of both ROCK1 and ROCK2 genes in cardiomyocytes promotes autophagy and reduces cardiac fibrosis during aging. FASEB J 33, 7348–7362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Surma M, Handy C, Chang J, Kapur R, Wei L, and Shi J (2014) ROCK1 deficiency enhances protective effects of antioxidants against apoptosis and cell detachment. PloS One 9, e90758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thumkeo D, Keel J, Ishizaki T, Hirose M, Nonomura K, Oshima H, Oshima M, Taketo MM, and Narumiya S (2003) Targeted disruption of the mouse rho-associated kinase 2 gene results in intrauterine growth retardation and fetal death. Mol Cell Biol 23, 5043–5055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Thumkeo D, Shimizu Y, Sakamoto S, Yamada S, and Narumiya S (2005) ROCK-I and ROCK-II cooperatively regulate closure of eyelid and ventral body wall in mouse embryo. Genes Cells 10, 825–834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chang YJ, Pownall S, Jensen TE, Mouaaz S, Foltz W, Zhou L, Liadis N, Woo M, Hao Z, Dutt P, Bilan PJ, Klip A, Mak T, and Stambolic V (2015) The Rho-guanine nucleotide exchange factor PDZ-RhoGEF governs susceptibility to diet-induced obesity and type 2 diabetes. eLife 4, e06011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Le Digabel J, Forcato M, Bicciato S, Elvassore N, and Piccolo S (2011) Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474, 179–183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lin JZ, and Farmer SR (2016) Morphogenetics in brown, beige and white fat development. Adipocyte 5, 130–135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Munoz VR, Gaspar RC, Kuga GK, Pavan ICB, Simabuco FM, da Silva ASR, de Moura LP, Cintra DE, Ropelle ER, and Pauli JR (2018) The effects of aging on rho kinase and insulin signalling in skeletal muscle and white adipose tissue of rats. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Montgomery MK, Hallahan NL, Brown SH, Liu M, Mitchell TW, Cooney GJ, and Turner N (2013) Mouse strain-dependent variation in obesity and glucose homeostasis in response to high-fat feeding. Diabetologia 56, 1129–1139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Begum N, Sandu OA, Ito M, Lohmann SM, and Smolenski A (2002) Active Rho kinase (ROK-alpha ) associates with insulin receptor substrate-1 and inhibits insulin signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 277, 6214–6222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Furukawa N, Ongusaha P, Jahng WJ, Araki K, Choi CS, Kim HJ, Lee YH, Kaibuchi K, Kahn BB, Masuzaki H, Kim JK, Lee SW, and Kim YB (2005) Role of Rho-kinase in regulation of insulin action and glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab 2, 119–129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chun KH, Araki K, Jee Y, Lee DH, Oh BC, Huang H, Park KS, Lee SW, Zabolotny JM, and Kim YB (2012) Regulation of glucose transport by ROCK1 differs from that of ROCK2 and is controlled by actin polymerization. Endocrinology 153, 1649–1662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Berry DC, Jiang Y, and Graff JM (2016) Mouse strains to study cold-inducible beige progenitors and beige adipocyte formation and function. Nat Commun 7, 10184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Barbatelli G, Murano I, Madsen L, Hao Q, Jimenez M, Kristiansen K, Giacobino JP, De Matteis R, and Cinti S (2010) The emergence of cold-induced brown adipocytes in mouse white fat depots is determined predominantly by white to brown adipocyte transdifferentiation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 298, E1244–1253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu J, Bostrom P, Sparks LM, Ye L, Choi JH, Giang AH, Khandekar M, Virtanen KA, Nuutila P, Schaart G, Huang K, Tu H, van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Hoeks J, Enerback S, Schrauwen P, and Spiegelman BM (2012) Beige adipocytes are a distinct type of thermogenic fat cell in mouse and human. Cell 150, 366–376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Akhter M, Qin T, Fischer P, Sadeghian H, Kim HH, Whalen MJ, Goldstein JN, and Ayata C (2018) Rho-kinase inhibitors do not expand hematoma volume in acute experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 5, 769–776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sadeghian H, Lacoste B, Qin T, Toussay X, Rosa R, Oka F, Chung DY, Takizawa T, Gu C, and Ayata C (2018) Spreading depolarizations trigger caveolin-1-dependent endothelial transcytosis. Ann Neurol 84, 409–423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Flynn R, Paz K, Du J, Reichenbach DK, Taylor PA, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Vulic A, Luznik L, MacDonald KK, Hill GR, Nyuydzefe MS, Weiss JM, Chen W, Trzeciak A, Serody JS, Aguilar EG, Murphy WJ, Maillard I, Munn D, Koreth J, Cutler CS, Antin JH, Ritz J, Waksal SD, Zanin-Zhorov A, and Blazar BR (2016) Targeted Rho-associated kinase 2 inhibition suppresses murine and human chronic GVHD through a Stat3-dependent mechanism. Blood 127, 2144–2154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Weiss JM, Chen W, Nyuydzefe MS, Trzeciak A, Flynn R, Tonra JR, Marusic S, Blazar BR, Waksal SD, and Zanin-Zhorov A (2016) ROCK2 signaling is required to induce a subset of T follicular helper cells through opposing effects on STATs in autoimmune settings. Sci Signal 9, ra73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zanin-Zhorov A, Flynn R, Waksaland SD, and Blazar BR (2016) Isoform-specific targeting of ROCK proteins in immune cells. Small GTPases 7, 173–177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zanin-Zhorov A, Weiss JM, Trzeciak A, Chen W, Zhang J, Nyuydzefe MS, Arencibia C, Polimera S, Schueller O, Fuentes-Duculan J, Bonifacio KM, Kunjravia N, Cueto I, Soung J, Fleischmann RM, Kivitz A, Lebwohl M, Nunez M, Woodson J, Smith SL, West RF, Berger M, Krueger JG, Ryan JL, and Waksal SD (2017) Cutting Edge: Selective Oral ROCK2 Inhibitor Reduces Clinical Scores in Patients with Psoriasis Vulgaris and Normalizes Skin Pathology via Concurrent Regulation of IL-17 and IL-10. J Immunol 198, 3809–3814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Diep DTV, Hong K, Khun T, Zheng M, Ul-Haq A, Jun HS, Kim YB, and Chun KH (2018) Anti-adipogenic effects of KD025 (SLx-2119), a ROCK2-specific inhibitor, in 3T3-L1 cells. Sci Rep 8, 2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.