Abstract
The cell cycle regulator p27Kip1 is a critical factor controlling cell number in many lineages. While its anti-proliferative effects are well-established, the extent to which this is a result of its function as a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor or through other known molecular interactions is not clear. To genetically dissect its role in the developing corneal endothelium, we examined mice harboring two loss-of-function alleles, a null allele (p27−) that abrogates all protein function and a knockin allele (p27CK−) that targets only its interaction with cyclins and CDKs. Whole-animal mutants, in which all cells are either homozygous knockout or knockin, exhibit identical proliferative increases (~0.6-fold) compared with wild-type tissues. On the other hand, use of mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM) to produce infrequently-occurring clones of wild-type and mutant cells within the same tissue environment uncovers a roughly three- and six-fold expansion of individual p27CK−/CK− and p27−/− cells, respectively. Mosaicism also reveals distinct migration phenotypes, with p27−/− cells being highly restricted to their site of production and p27CK−/CK− cells more widely scattered within the endothelium. Using a density-based clustering algorithm to quantify dispersal of MADM-generated clones, a four-fold difference in aggregation is seen between the two types of mutant cells. Overall, our analysis reveals that, in developing mouse corneal endothelium, p27 regulates cell number by acting cell autonomously, both through its interactions with cyclins and CDKs and through a cyclin-CDK-independent mechanism(s). Combined with its parallel influence on cell motility, it constitutes a potent multi-functional effector mechanism with major impact on tissue organization.
Introduction
The corneal endothelium is a fluid transporting epithelium that is essential for corneal hydration and transparency. Consisting of a monolayer of flat, irregularly-shaped cells with dendrite-like processes, this tissue provides an important physiological interface between the cornea and the adjoining aqueous humor [1–7]. A critical determinant of endothelium function is cell density, which in healthy adult humans generally exceeds 2500 cells/mm2 [8–9]. Because mature corneal endothelial cells (CEnCs) do not undergo large-scale renewal, cell death due to disease, injury or aging leads inevitably to a decline in cell number [10–14]. When cell density falls below approximately 500 cells/mm2, a condition referred to as corneal endothelial disease occurs, in which corneal fluid balance is severely compromised and the cornea swells and becomes opaque. Despite the presence under certain circumstances of a corneal wound healing response, in which cell polyploidization and enlargement is triggered [15–16], this and other potential repair mechanisms are apparently insufficient to maintain tissue integrity under severe conditions. In these cases, surgical intervention via transplantation is generally required to correct the resulting endothelial dysfunction [17–19]. Thus, in the normal corneal endothelium, tissue structure and function are largely dependent on the continued maintenance of cells generated during the developmental period. For this reason, the mechanisms by which cell number is established and preserved are of fundamental importance.
Developmentally, the endothelium is derived from cranial neural crest cells which, following their migration into the eye, undergo a mesenchymal-epithelial transition to construct an integrated monolayer [20]. Studies in rodents have shown that presumptive CEnCs actively proliferate during the embryological and early postnatal periods but become arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle shortly thereafter [21]. While the mechanisms responsible for limiting cell division are incompletely understood, the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p27Kip1 (hereafter referred to as p27) is thought to play a central role. In the corneal endothelium of rats and mice, expression of p27 is upregulated during the first two weeks of postnatal life at a time when endothelial cell proliferation declines and monolayer maturation takes place [21–24]. Furthermore, in p27 knockout mice there is both enhanced production of CEnCs and extension of cell division further into the postnatal period [24].
As a component of the retinoblastoma pathway, p27 is a critical modulator of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Initially characterized as a relatively broad-based CDK inhibitor, its most important targets are now recognized to be cyclin E and CDK2 [25]. Through simultaneous binding to both proteins, p27 is able to block cyclin-CDK interaction, as well as interfere with ATP binding to the kinase, thus inhibiting catalytic activity [26]. Genetically-engineered mice have been particularly informative in outlining the role of this inhibitor in postnatal growth of many tissues [27–31]. For example, p27-null animals are larger than normal and exhibit multi-organ hyperplasia. Furthermore, the fact that deficient cells are smaller than control cells in some tissues may reflect altered coupling between cell growth and the cell division cycle [27, 32].
In interpreting results from knockout mice, it is often assumed that the sole effect of p27 gene ablation on proliferation is its interference with operation of the core cell cycle machinery. However, recent evidence has indicated that, in addition to its established role as a cyclin-CDK inhibitor, p27 may also function indirectly as an anti-proliferation factor by restraining mitogenic cell signaling through its interaction with the microtubule-destabilizing protein stathmin [33, 34]. Thus, the possibility exists that p27 could be influencing endothelial cell proliferation through both cyclin-CDK-dependent and -independent pathways.
To begin to dissect p27 gene function in mouse corneal endothelium, we have compared a knockout line (p27−) with a knockin strain (p27CK−) in which four amino acid substitutions in the p27 (cdkn1b) gene product prevent the interaction of p27 with cyclins and CDK but leave its other functions intact [30, 31, 35]. As with previous studies of whole-organism mutants, our results demonstrate very similar proliferative phenotypes for the endothelium in these two types of mice. Importantly, however, use of mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM) to cause sporadic induction of homozygous mutant and wild-type cells in heterozygous monolayers reveals dramatic increases in cell proliferation that are quantitatively different for p27-null and p27CK− lines. While expansion of p27CK− cells is almost three-fold greater than wild-type cells, that of p27-null cells is increased approximately six-fold. These data indicate that p27 exerts its influence on cell division through both cell cycle-dependent and -independent mechanism and that, in both cases, the effect is cell-autonomous. Finally, our evidence showing that the two mutants have opposite effects on cell dispersion within endothelial monolayers confirm previous work documenting the inhibitor’s involvement in cell migration and highlight the fact that p27 is able to regulate proliferation and migration in a coordinate fashion during development.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The use of animals for this study was approved by the University Committee on Animal Care (UCAC) at East Tennessee State University (ETSU; Animal Use Protocol P190702) and was in compliance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Care and Use of Animals in Research and the ARVO Statement for Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Mice were housed in the Division of Laboratory Animal Resources at ETSU, a facility accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC), and maintained in an environment of 12-h light/12-h dark.
Animals
Conventional genetic analysis was carried out using two whole-animal mutant mouse strains, a p27-null strain (designated p27−) with targeted disruption of the entire p27 coding region and a knock-in line (p27CK−) in which point mutations abrogate the ability of p27 to bind cyclins and CDKs [27, 30]. The null strain (129-Cdkn1btm1Mlf/J; Stock #003122) was obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). These mice are larger than normal littermates due to extra cell divisions in virtually all lineages. The knockin strain, which has a similar phenotype, was a generous gift of Dr. Michael Dyer (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital). Hemizygous (p27+/−) or heterozygous (p27+/CK−) mice were interbred to generate the p27−/− and p27CK−/CK− animals and wild-type littermates (p27+/+) used in these experiments. Genotyping was as described previously [27, 30].
For mosaic analysis, the two p27 mutant strains were used in combination with four other lines: MADM-6GR (129-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm3(CAG-EGFP/Dsred2)Luo/J; Stock #006041) [36], MADM-6RG (129-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm2(CAG-Dsred2/EGFP)Luo/J; Stock #006067) [36], Hprt-Cre [37] (129S1/Sv-Hprttm1(CAG-cre)Mnn/J Stock #004302) and C57BL/6J (Stock #000664), all from The Jackson Laboratory. MADM-6GR and MADM-6RG each carry marker transgenes, targeted to the Rosa26 locus on chromosome 6, that are reciprocally chimeric for red (R) and green (G) fluorescent proteins (Fig 1). In the case of MADM-6GR mice, the N terminal coding region of EGFP is combined with the C terminal coding region of DsRed2, while in MADM-6RG mice the orientation is reversed. To allow enhanced visualization of DsRed2, six copies of the Myc epitope were engineered into the constructs used to produce transgenes so that the expressed protein can be labeled using an anti-c-Myc antibody. Interposed between the N- and C-terminal sequences is an intron within which is embedded a single loxP site. Because the intron shifts the reading frame, any proteins produced are nonfunctional. However, when the MADM-6GR and MADM-6RG transgenes are present on homologous chromosomes, a Cre-catalyzed interchromosomal recombination event will result in the exchange of C- and N-terminal portions, reconstituting the coding regions for each of the original fluorescent proteins (Fig 1). In these studies, recombinase activity was supplied by a Cre transgene targeted to the X-linked HPRT gene, which is expressed ubiquitously. All strains were kept as separate homozygous stocks before MADM analysis and were genotyped by PCR as described [36, 37].
Adult mice older than 8-weeks were used for all studies. Results from both male and female animals were pooled, since no apparent differences were noted between the sexes in preliminary experiments.
Generation of MADM mice
Inherent in the MADM strategy is the unique and indelible labeling of the two daughter cells produced when a dividing cell undergoes interchromosomal recombination. In Fig 1, a cell containing the MADM-6GR and MADM-6RG transgenes, each on separate chromosomes, is depicted passing from G1 phase through S phase replication and into G2 phase. Prior to S phase recombination, the cell in G1 phase is unlabeled. Following DNA replication, Cre-induced rearrangement between loxP sites located on homologous chromosomes will result in restored GFP and RFP sequences in two of the four homologous chromosomes. Upon completion of mitosis, the labeled cells that result will depend on the mode of chromosomal segregation. In the case of X segregation, each cell will inherit one functional and one non-functional fluorescent protein gene, which upon expression will cause one cell to fluoresce red and the other green. Z segregation, on the other hand, will generate cells with either two reconstituted or two non-reconstituted transgenes (yellow and colorless, respectively). Importantly, unlike the situation when Cre activity takes place in G2 phase, recombination in non-mitotic cells during either G0 or G1 converts a colorless cell to a yellow cell that expresses both fluorescent proteins (Fig 1). Thus, in MADM mice the segregation within a cell of functionally recombined DsRed or GFP genes is linked to the generation of either a red or green cell, respectively.
If the above recombination event takes place on a wild-type background, the result will be marked cells that are phenotypically normal, a situation referred to as WT-MADM. This approach has been used successfully to fill restricted numbers of CEnCs with fluorescent label for cell shape analysis [5]. GR-MADM, a variant strategy appropriate for single-cell phenotypic analysis, is made possible when one chromosome contains a mutation of interest distal (telomeric) to the knockin site of the MADM cassette (in this case, Rosa26). Because the red/green transgenes are linked to the wild-type/mutant alleles, respectively, through meiotic recombination, G2 recombination followed by X segregation (i.e., a G2-X event) will generate a green daughter cell homozygous for the mutation and a red sibling homozygous for the wild-type allele. G2-Z, G1 or G0 events, on the other hand, will produce cells that remain heterozygous and, because of their color (yellow) or lack thereof, are distinguishable from single color homozygous cells. In all cases, continued division of any one of the marked cells involved will thereafter lead to daughter cells of the same genotype. Finally, because the likelihood of recombination is relatively low at any one mitotic event, marked cells are generally rare and widely distributed, making the identification of such events more feasible [36, 38, 39].
In our experiments, implementation of WT-MADM was accomplished through a series of two crosses [40]. First, homozygous MADM-6RG/RG and HprtCre/Cre mice were interbred to produce double heterozygotes. The latter were then mated with MADM-6GR/GR animals to generate Cre-positive mice (MADM-6GR/RG; HprtWT/Cre) used for experiments and Cre-negative animals (MADM-6GR/RG; HprtWT/WT), which provided a control. GR-MADM was carried out separately for the p27CK− and p27− mutant strains [40]. In both cases, MADM-6GR/GR mice were first bred to heterozygous mutant animals (p27+/− or p27+/CK−) and double heterozygotes (MADM-6WT/GR; p27+/− or MADM-6WT/GR; p27 +/CK−) identified by genotyping. The latter were then backcrossed to wild-type C57Bl/6J mice to produce progeny that were screened by PCR for meiotic recombinants in which a mutant gene allele (p27CK− or p27−) was linked to the MADM-6GR transgene (designated p27 MADM-6WT/GR). Finally, p27 MADM-6WT/GR mice were crossed with MADM-6WT/RG; HprtWT/Cre double heterozygotes (generated as above from MADM-6RG/RG and HprtCre/Cre animals) in order to produce p27 MADM-6GR/RG; HprtWT/Cre experimental mice and p27 MADM-6GR/RG; HprtWT/WT controls.
Tissue preparation and immunostaining
Mice were euthanized using CO2 inhalation, followed by decapitation and pneumothorax. The eyes were then surgically isolated, punctured posteriorly with a 27-gauge needle and fixed overnight at 4°C in 2% paraformaldehyde in sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.0 [41]. After several washes in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.3 (PBS), the globes were dissected to remove all non-corneal tissues and processed for reporter visualization and/or immunocytochemistry (see below). In most cases, corneas were kept intact for subsequent flat-mounting [5]. Occasionally, they were cryoprotected with 20% sucrose overnight, frozen in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Torrance, CA) and sectioned at 10μm using a cryomicrotome.
In order to visualize cell boundaries, corneas from wild-type mice and whole-animal mutants were labeled with an antibody to the tight junction-associated protein ZO-1. To suppress non-specific binding of the anti-mouse secondary antibody, tissues underwent a two-stage blocking reaction. In the first stage, they were incubated in normal donkey serum (NDS; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), diluted 1:10 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), pH 7.3, with 1.0% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.4% Triton X-100 (TBS-BSA-Triton X-100; 1 h; room temperature). Then, after several rinses in TBS corneas were blocked with goat anti-mouse IgG Fab fragments (Jackson ImmunoResearch; 0.13 mg/ml; 1 h; room temperature) prior to overnight incubation at 4°C in mouse anti-ZO-1 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA; 1A12; 1:100). Following further buffer washes, tissues were stained for 2 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies) before being rinsed and flat-mounted.
Intact corneas or corneal sections from MADM mice were blocked with NDS, then incubated overnight at 4°C in combined primary antibodies (chicken anti-green fluorescent protein [GFP]; Aves Labs, Tigard, OR; 1:500 and goat anti-c-Myc; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO; 1:200) diluted in TBS-BSA-Triton X-100. The c-Myc antibody was pre-absorbed with fixed wild-type corneal tissue pieces before use (see [42]). The following day, specimens were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated anti-chicken IgG (1:200 dilution) and Alexa Fluor 555–conjugated anti-goat IgG (1:400 dilution) to enhance visualization of EGFP and c-Myc-DsRed2, respectively. After several buffer rinses, four radial incisions were made in each cornea to allow flattening of the tissue, which was then placed on a glass slide with the endothelium facing up and coverslipped using Vectashield fluorescence mounting medium (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) [32].
Microscopy, image analysis and statistics
Corneal tissues were examined in either a Leica TCS SP2 or SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with standard excitation and emission filters (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany). Images from anti-ZO-1-stained endothelial monolayers were acquired using a 20X (NA = 0.7) infinity-adjusted objective at zoom = 3.0, while those from MADM-labeled tissues employed a 10X (NA = 0.4) objective and zoom = 1.0. Maximum z-stack projections were assembled from individual optical slices (1024 X 1024 resolution) taken at 1μm intervals. Under these conditions, 3–5 slices were sufficient to include the entire endothelial cell layer. Tonal quality of the resulting projection images was adjusted using the Levels tool in Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) prior to further processing.
Evaluation of endothelial cell density and collection of morphometric parameters were carried out using Fiji software [43]. Within a corneal flat-mount, four central and four peripheral sites (one each per tissue quadrant) were selected for image acquisition. Central areas were defined as those lying within a circle (radius = 1250um) encompassing the innermost corneal surface area, while peripheral regions were limited to those within 200μm of the cornea-sclera junction. Approximately 0.25mm2 of tissue (3.6% of the total) was sampled in this way. Using a custom ImageJ1 macro designed by one of us (JB; available at http://www.biovoxxel.de/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Endothelial Cells Detection_Final.ijm), cell boundaries were identified by an algorithm involving various convolution filters and a Voronoi diagram (based on Dirichlet tessellation). The detected cell areas were used as input for further analysis. Cell density and area, the number of neighboring cells and circularity (a measure of cell shape) were obtained using the Extended Particle Analyzer and Neighbor Analysis functions of the ImageJ BioVoxxel Toolbox. For each parameter, the four central and peripheral measurements were averaged separately.
To compare patterns of cell proliferation and radial dispersion in mosaic corneas, panoramas encompassing the full expanse of labeled endothelia were assembled from multiple overlapping Z-stacks. In initial studies, this was accomplished using the Photomerge command of Photoshop, with individual single- and double-labeled cells counted manually in the composite images. In subsequent analyses, we made use of a macro (designed by JB) that incorporates Z-projection image stitching along with automatic detection and annotation of labeled cells. Twin spots (MADM-generated clones containing wild-type and mutant cells) were defined as groups of adjacent red and green cells located at least 200μm from the nearest single-labeled cell. They were identified using an algorithm that exploits cell proximity measurements to discover closely associated red and green cells within a circle of defined radius, followed by manual elimination of possible overlapping clones. A best fit was achieved in WT-MADM corneas with a radius of 82 pixels (248μm), which was then applied to mutant mosaic tissues. Analysis of the spatial arrangement of single-labeled cells within endothelia was implemented using a size and shape invariant modification of the density-based clustering algorithm DBSCAN for 2D images [44]. In this unsupervised algorithm, dense regions (clusters) within an array of points are identified by the maximum distance between points (ε) and the minimum number of points (minimum density) in a cluster. Data in the present study were obtained using ε = 45 pixels (136μm, cluster radius) and minimum density = 4 (minimum cluster size). All of the processing and analytical tools described are available as partially individual plugins as part of the ImageJ BioVoxxel Toolbox (SSIDC Cluster Indicator) or as ImageJ1 macro code (complete processing pipeline for cluster and twin spot analysis at http://www.biovoxxel.de/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/SSIDC_Cluster_And TwinSpot Analysis Final.ijm). Instructions for their use can be found under https://imagej.net/BioVoxxel Toolbox or in the respective macro code.
For whole-animal studies, one cornea per mouse was used to generate quantitative data. On the other hand, in reporting the MADM results we made use of both tissues of a single animal where possible. Our rationale for this is based on the assumption that the number and developmental timing of recombination events are random and, thus, uncorrelated between eyes. The substantial amount of variability observed between endothelia of an individual mouse (e.g., green cell/red cell ratios differ by as much as 87%) confirmed this prediction. In such cases, both corneas of an animal were included in the analysis in order to document this variation and provide a fuller picture of the data.
All data were presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 8.0 software for Mac (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Results
The corneal endothelia of whole-organism p27CK-/CK- and p27−/− mutants are indistinguishable phenotypically
We first examined the effects of the p27CK− and p27− alleles on endothelial cell density in whole-organism mutants. Representative images of tissue flat-mounts from homozygous wild-type and mutant corneas are displayed in Fig 2A–2F. Compared with wild-type monolayers, central regions of both p27CK−/CK− and p27−/− endothelia exhibit density enhancements of approximately 60% (Fig 2G). A very similar quantitative relationship is also seen for peripheral regions, although the latter maintain consistently lower cell densities relative to central areas in all genotypes (Fig 2G).
One consequence of the increased cell densities in mutant endothelia is corresponding decreases in average cell size, estimated as apical face area (S1A Fig). When the data are plotted as size distributions, these decreases are seen to be the result of regionally distinct transformations. In the case of central areas, there is a shift in the peak of mutant cell sizes to smaller values, with relatively little change in peak widths (S1B–S1D Fig). On the other hand, for peripheral regions the peak shift is accompanied by a more compressed size distribution, as well as a greater overlap with central values (S1B–S1D Fig).
To investigate whether the increased cell density seen in p27CK-/CK- and p27−/− mutants has an impact on apical cell surface geometry, analyses of cell shape and nearest neighbors were carried out. Our results show that, while there is a small but significant increase in circularity (regularity of shape) for cells in central regions compared to those in peripheral regions across all genotypes, little difference is seen between the respective regional populations of wild-type and mutant endothelial cells (S2A Fig). Similarly, neighbor analysis indicates that the distribution of neighbors per cell, and thus the arrangement of cells within monolayers, is unchanged by gene knock-out or mutation (S2B–S2D Fig).
MADM allows analysis of single cells generated during endothelial development
To investigate p27 gene function at the level of individual cells, mosaic analysis was carried out. Initially, corneas from WT-MADM mice were examined to assess cell labeling and establish a baseline for mutant studies. When these tissues are viewed in cross-section, rare examples of labeled cells can be localized within the endothelial cell layer (arrowheads in Fig 3A). Similar specimens prepared as flat-mounts allow all GFP+ and RFP+ cells to be seen within the context of the monolayer (Fig 3B). While most are double-labeled (yellow), in every cornea variable numbers of single-labeled (green and red) cells are produced as a result of Cre-mediated G2X (mitotic recombination) events. These occur singly but are often components of discrete groups of cells in which one red cell or cluster lies adjacent to a green cell or cluster (Fig 3B, boxed areas). Since such groups are generally limited in number and widely separated within monolayers, they likely represent the progeny of single (interchromosomal) recombination events, referred to as twin spots, [40, 45]. To explore this further, we determined the number and size of single-labeled cell groups using a proximity-based algorithm (see Materials and Methods). Our results show that, for WT-MADM tissues, an average of only about four such groups are observed per cornea. Furthermore, the majority (83%) of these are of relatively small size (two to four cells each), suggesting that they represent independent clones, rather than the merger of cells from more than one MADM event (Fig 3C). Importantly, when considered both on the basis of whole corneas and individual twin spots, green and red cells are generated in approximately equal numbers, indicating that expression of fluorescence markers does not differentially affect the expansion potential of wild-type sibling cells (Fig 3D).
Endothelial cells expressing p27CK- and p27− alleles exhibit divergent proliferative and migration phenotypes
GR-MADM was performed in order to compare wild-type and mutant cells within the same endothelial monolayer. Examination of whole-mounted corneas from the p27CK− and p27− mosaic strains indicates that there are substantially more single-labeled cells present than in WT-MADM, with noticeably greater numbers of green cells than red cells (Fig 4A and 4B). To represent this increase of mutant cells relative to wild-type quantitatively, we made use of the green/red cell ratio as a metric [40]. Our analysis of the entire population of single-labeled endothelial cells in p27CK− mosaic corneas indicates that cells expressing a non-functional CDK inhibitor generate almost three times more progeny than those with wild-type p27 (Fig 4C). Surprisingly, p27− mosaics, in which there is complete loss of CDK inhibitor expression, exhibit a further two-fold increase in the green- to red-cell ratio, resulting in an overall six-fold expansion of mutant to wild-type cells (Fig 4C).
To determine whether these mutation-specific differences are due to changes in the proliferative potential of individual cells, we performed twin spot analysis. Using the same criteria employed for WT-MADM corneas, twin spot number and size are seen to differ significantly between the two mutants (Fig 4D). In the case of p27CK− mosaic corneas, coherent groups of GFP+ and RFP+ cells are relatively rare and, similar to wild-type tissues, contain only two to four cells each. By contrast, a shift in the distribution of p27− mosaic twin spots to larger sizes results in more single-labeled cells being found in these arrays. Importantly, twin spots in the latter corneas have substantially higher green/red cell ratios than those from either p27CK− mosaics or p27+ tissues, indicating an increased proliferative potential for cells of this genotype (Fig 4E).
While endothelia in both p27CK− and p27− mosaics have elevated numbers of mutant green cells, due to increased recombination events and enhanced cell division, the resulting cells are distributed very differently within their respective tissues. Fig 5 shows representative regions, from both wild-type and mutant mosaic corneas, where red and green cells are relatively abundant. Single-labeled cells in twin spots of WT-MADM tissues are generally located within one or a few cell diameters of one another (Fig 5A–5A”). Because of the rarity of recombination events, this arrangement results in small discrete groups of clustered cells. In p27CK− mosaics, on the other hand, individual green and red cells appear scattered within the corneal monolayer, with extensive areas of unlabeled cells interposed between them (Fig 5B–5B”). The fact that obvious groups of single-labeled cells are less evident, suggests a greater degree of mobility of cells away from sites of MADM-generation in these corneas. Interestingly, clusters of green cells in p27− mosaics appear to be even more delimited than those of wild-type tissues. Examples of close-packed GFP+ cells, along with associated RFP+ cells, are depicted in Fig 5C–5C”. In these clusters, adjacent mutant cells often appear to directly touch one another. The highly restricted distribution of single-labeled cells, coupled with the expanded generation of p27− mutant cells characteristic of these mosaics, often leads to large clusters of GFP+ cells (Fig 5C).
Whole-endothelium plots of single-labeled cells reveal global patterns of cell distribution that mirror the differences seen in dispersion of GFP+ and RFP+ cells from local sites of G2-X recombination. In WT-MADM corneas, red and green cells are observed mainly in small clusters, although they also exist singly (Fig 6A). While p27CK−-expressing cells are evenly distributed across endothelial monolayers, p27−/− cells are confined to relatively few highly coherent clusters (Fig 6B and 6C). To quantify these patterns, we used the density-based algorithm DBSCAN to perform cluster analysis. Fig 6D illustrates that, compared with p27+/+-expressing cells in WT-MADM tissues, the percentage of p27CK−/CK− in clusters is 0.6-fold less, while that of p27−/− cells is 2.5-fold more.
Discussion
p27 is a pivotal factor regulating cell cycle withdrawal in many lineages of developing organisms, including those of the corneal endothelium. In this study, we compared proliferation and migration phenotypes of murine CEnCs expressing either partial (p27CK-) or full (p27−) loss-of-function alleles of the cdk1b gene. Whole animal mutants, in which all cells are affected, exhibited moderate (~0.6-fold) endothelial hyperplasia, with no quantitative difference between the two variant strains with respect to the final cell density achieved. On the other hand, in endothelia with sporadically-generated homozygous mutant and wild-type cells there was a much greater increase in mutant cell number expansion, as well as a two-fold difference between mice with the p27CK- and p27− alleles.
The approximately six-fold enhancement in MADM-generated mutant versus wild-type cells is similar to that previously reported for cerebellar granule cells by Muzumdar et al. [40]. As discussed by these authors, proliferation of mutant cells may be less restricted in mosaic mice because they constitute a relatively small proportion of the tissues in which they are produced. Thus, actively dividing cells would be expected to encounter less competition from surrounding wild-type cells than in the situation where all cells are mutant. Furthermore, because a smaller portion of the tissue is engaged in cell expansion, there would be less likelihood of activating inhibitory mechanisms regulating global tissue size.
An unexpected result from our study concerns the two-fold difference in the number of mutant cells, compared to wild-type, in mosaics expressing the p27CK- and p27− alleles. p27 is a regulatory factor whose only direct influence on cell cycle progression is believed to be as a G1 cyclin-CDK inhibitor [25]. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that this function is completely eliminated by mutations that alter four amino acids involved in cyclin and CDK binding [30, 35]. For these reasons, it was predicted that homozygous expression of the p27CK- allele would produce a phenotype equivalent to that of the p27-null allele. The fact that CEnC proliferation is actually further enhanced in cells harboring two knockout alleles indicates that p27 negatively regulates cell cycle progression through an additional mechanism that is unrelated to its role as a cyclin-CDK inhibitor.
One way that p27 could be acting in a non-canonical fashion is through effects on mitogenic signaling pathways that regulate cell cycle progression. For example, Fabris et al. [34] have recently shown using mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) that cytoplasmic p27 regulates MAPK (ERK1/2) activation, and consequent early G1-S transit, through its effects on microtubule stability. This effect was shown to be dependent on the interaction of p27 with the microtubule-destabilizing protein stathmin, since increased proliferation in p27-null mice was reverted by concomitant deletion of the stathmin gene [33]. Unlike the binding sites for CDKs which are located within the N-terminal portion of p27, the interaction with stathmin had been previously mapped to the C-terminal part of the protein [46]. Interestingly, in these experiments the augmentation of cell division was due to faster cell cycle reentry whereas, using MADM, Muzumdar et al. [40] have demonstrated that deletion of p27 results in extra cell cycles.
An alternative way in which p27 could be influencing CEnC proliferation is through the small GTPase RhoA. Cytoplasmic p27 has been shown to inhibit Rho signaling by blocking the binding and activation of RhoA by Rho-GEFs [47]. Coupled with the established involvement of activated Rho and its downstream effectors ROCK I and II in mitogen-stimulated G1-S phase progression, p27 could be functioning as an indirect modulator of cell division [48–50]. In NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, where conditional activation of a ROCK-estrogen receptor fusion protein is sufficient to stimulate G1-S cell cycle progression, activated ROCK acts by upregulating cyclin D1 and cyclin A expression through Ras/MAPK and LIMK activation, respectively [51]. Therefore, p27 could be exerting anti-proliferative effects both as a cyclin-CDK inhibitor in the nucleus and as a modulator of Rho/ROCK signaling in the cytoplasm.
While a role for stathmin in CEnC proliferation has not been investigated, there is ample evidence for the involvement of ROCK in cell division of corneal endothelium. Initial experiments by Okumura et al. [52] using cultured monkey CEnCs demonstrated that the specific ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 promoted cell adhesion, inhibited apoptosis and increased the frequency of dividing cells. Further studies have shown that these proliferative effects are due to coordinate upregulation of cyclin D and downregulation of p27 via enhanced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3-K)-Akt signaling [53]. Evidence that active ROCK may normally be restraining cell division in adult CEnCs has been reproduced in several species, both in vitro and in vivo [54–57]. In contrast to these studies, essentially opposite results of RhoA and ROCK inhibitors on endothelial cell proliferation have been reported by Zhu et al. [58]. When siRNA against the p120 catenin was administered to human CEnC cultures, causing activation of trafficking of this adherens junction component to the nucleus, BrdU incorporation was stimulated in parallel with increased RhoA-ROCK signaling. Furthermore, this BrdU incorporation was abolished by inhibitors targeting either RhoA (CT-04) or ROCK (Y27632). While these data appear to be in conflict with one another, there is evidence that the direction of cell division upon Rho/ROCK signaling can be cell type- or context-specific [50]. Thus, these studies suggest that, under different conditions, ROCK can be either an activator or an inhibitor of cell division.
Given the cell type- and context-specific nature of proliferative regulatory mechanisms, it is important that investigation of p27’s cyclin-CDK-independent effects be carried out on CEnCs in as unperturbed a state as possible. In culture, comparison between p27KO and p27CK- cells from multiple tissues find them to be indistinguishable, both in their proliferative behavior and in their expression and regulation of cell cycle factors [30, 31]. Thus, in vitro studies of these genotypes may be of limited use in uncovering the mechanisms that underlie the distinct proliferative behaviors in situ that we have described. Rather, strategies to selectively perturb individual signaling pathways in single cells of developing mouse corneas would seem to be a more productive direction for future investigation. Developing the appropriate methods is not straightforward, but is likely necessary to specify the mechanisms underlying the noncanonical effects of p27 on proliferation in the developing cornea.
In addition to proliferative changes, our experiments reveal major differences in the distribution of MADM-generated wild-type and mutant CEnCs within developing endothelial cell monolayers. Because pairs of red and green cells that arise by G2-X recombination initially lie directly adjacent to one another, the extent of dispersion of these cells and their progeny is an indication of their radial migration. The fact that most labeled p27+/+ cells generated in WT-MADM tissues remain in relatively close proximity to one another indicates that CEnCs normally exhibit limited motility within the developing monolayer. Consequently, the greater dispersion of p27CK−-expressing cells suggests enhanced migration, while the more highly clustered arrangement of p27—expressing cells indicates more restricted migration.
Previously, it’s been demonstrated that cultured p27-deficient MEFs exhibit impaired motility in combination with an increased number and size of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions [47, 59, 60]. This was shown to be the result of increased Rho-GTP levels due to loss of p27 and its ability to directly bind and inhibit Rho activation by guanine–nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) [47]. Consequently, Besson et al. [47] have proposed that p27 normally acts as a positive regulator of cell migration by titrating the Rho signal and allowing for cell movement through a balance of Rac and Rho activities. Supporting the importance of this pathway in developing tissues, regulation of RhoA by p27 has been found to be important for proper migration of neuronal progenitor cells in the subventricular cortex of developing mice [61, 62]. In contrast to this work, Baldassarre et al. [46] have presented evidence that, in cultured sarcoma cells, p27 is normally a negative regulator of migration, while its binding to stathmin is able to counteract this migration inhibition.
The highly restricted distribution of p27-null cells seen in our MADM experiments is consistent with reduced motility due to excessive Rho activity. Conversely, the fact that dispersion of homozygous p27CK—expressing CEnCs is actually increased may be related to expression of the inhibitor. Besson et al. [47] have previously noted that both embryonic (MEFs) and adult cells from p27CK- knock-in mice produce levels of p27 above those seen in wild-type controls, most likely because cyclin and CDK binding is important for turnover of the protein [30, 35, 63]. If a similar increase takes place in p27CK- mosaic corneas, this could account for the apparent enhancement in migration by mutant CEnCs that we see since the migration‑promoting activity of p27 lies in the C‑terminal half of the protein, which would be intact in p27CK-/CK- mutants [59].
Overall, our results highlight unexpected complexity in the way that the cell cycle effector protein p27 acts during construction of the corneal endothelium. The fact that its mutation has profound consequences for both cell proliferation and migration underscores the intimate link between these two functions in cells and the role of p27 in their integration. Finally, our studies further demonstrate the advantages of single cell mutational analysis for unravelling protein function within the context of developing mammalian tissues.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Dr. Simon Hippenmeyer of the Institute of Science and Technology Austria for helpful advice on the early stages of this study.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R15 EY17997) and the ETSU Research Development Committee (to DMD). It was also funded by NIH grant C06RR0306551. Support in the form of salary (to JB) was provided by BioVoxxel, Ludwigshafen, Germany. None of these funders had any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of all authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
References
- 1.Kreutziger GO. Lateral membrane morphology and gap junction structure in rabbit corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 1976; 23:285–93. 10.1016/0014-4835(76)90129-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hirsch M, Renard G, Faure J-P, Pouliquen Y. Study of the ultrastructure of the rabbit corneal endothelium by the freeze-fracture technique: apical and lateral junctions. Exp Eye Res. 1977. September; 25(3):277–88. 10.1016/0014-4835(77)90094-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ringvold A, Davanger M, Olsen EG. On the spatial organization of the cornea endothelium. Acta Ophthalmol. 1984. December; 62(6):911–8. 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1984.tb08442.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Forest F, Thuret G, DuMollard JM, Peoc’h M, Perrache C, He Z. Optimization of immunostaining on flat mounted human corneas. Mol Vis. 2015. December 30; 21:1345–1356. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harrison TA, He Z, Boggs K, Thuret G, Liu HX, Defoe DM. Corneal endothelial cells possess an elaborate multipolar shape to maximize the basolateral to apical membrane area. Mol Vis. 2016. January 16;22:31–9. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He Z, Forest F, Gain P, Rageade D, Bernard A, Acquart S, et al. 3D map of the human corneal endothelial cell. Sci Rep. 2016; July 6;6:29047 10.1038/srep29047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bonanno JA. Molecular mechanisms underlying the corneal endothelial pump. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95:2–7. 10.1016/j.exer.2011.06.004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wilson RS, Roper-Hall MJ. Effect of age on the endothelial cell count in the normal eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982. August;66(8):513–5. 10.1136/bjo.66.8.513 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murphy C, Alvarado J, Juster R, Maglio M. Prenatal and postnatal cellularity of the human corneal endothelium. A quantitative histologic study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984. March;25(3):312–22. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joyce NC. Proliferative capacity of the corneal endothelium. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003. May;22(3):359–89. 10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00065-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Laing RA, Sanstrom MM, Berrospi AR, Leibowitz HM. Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age. Exp Eye Res. 1976. June;22(6):587–94. 10.1016/0014-4835(76)90003-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laule A, Cable MK, Hoffman CE, Hanna C. Endothelial cell population changes of human cornea during life. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978. November;96(11):2031–5. 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060419003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sherrard ES. The corneal endothelium in vivo: its response to mild trauma. Exp Eye Res. 1976. April;22(4):347–57. 10.1016/0014-4835(76)90227-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yee RW, Matsuda M, Schultz RO, Edelhauser HF. Changes in the normal corneal endothelial cellular pattern as a function of age. Curr Eye Res. 1985. June;4(6):671–8. 10.3109/02713688509017661 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ikebe H, Takamatsu T, Itoi M, Fujita S. Age-dependent changes in nuclear DNA content and cell size of presumably normal human corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 1986. August;43(2):251–8. 10.1016/s0014-4835(86)80093-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Losick VP, Jun AS, Spradling AC. Wound-induced polyploidization: regulation by Hippo and JNK signaling and conservation in mammals. PLoS One 2016. March 9;11(3):e0151251 10.1371/journal.pone.0151251 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mishima S. Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium-XXXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982. January;93(1):1–29. 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90693-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schmedt T, Silva MM, Ziaei A, Jurkunas U. Molecular bases of corneal endothelial dystrophies. Exp Eye Res. 2012. February;95(1):24–34. 10.1016/j.exer.2011.08.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tan DT, Dart JK, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. Lancet. 2012. May 5;379(9827):1749–61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60437-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tuft SJ, Coster DJ. The corneal endothelium. Eye. 1990;4(Pt 3):389–424. 10.1038/eye.1990.53 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Joyce NC, Harris DL, Zieske JD. Mitotic inhibition of corneal endothelium in neonatal rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998. December;39(13):2572–83. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gordon SR. Changes in extracellular matrix proteins and actin during corneal endothelial growth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990. January;31(1):94–101. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Joyce NC, Harris DL, Mello DM. Mechanisms of mitotic inhibition in corneal endothelium: contact inhibition and TGF-beta2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002. July;43(7):2152–9. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yoshida K, Kase S, Nakayama K, Nagahama H, Harada T, Ikeda H, et al. Involvement of p27KIP1 in the proliferation of the developing corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004. July;45(7):2163–7. 10.1167/iovs.03-1238 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999. June 15;13(12):1501–12. 10.1101/gad.13.12.1501 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Russo AA, Jeffrey PD, Patten AK, Massagué J, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent-kinase inhibitor bound to the cyclin A-Cdk2 complex. Nature 1996. July 25;382(6589):325–31. 10.1038/382325a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fero ML, Rivkin M, Tasch M, Porter P, Carow CE, Firpo E, et al. A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility in p27Kip1-deficient mice. Cell. 1996. May 31;85(5):733–44. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81239-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kiyokawa H, Kineman RD, Manova-Todorova KO, Soares VC, Hoffman ES, Ono M, et al. Enhanced growth of mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function of p27Kip1. Cell. 1996. May 31;85(5):721–32. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81238-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nakayama K, Ishida N, Shirane M, Inomata A, Inoue T, Shishido N, et al. Mice lacking p27Kip1 display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors. Cell. 1996. May 31;85(5):707–20. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81237-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Besson A, Gurian-West M, Chen X, Kelly-Spratt KS, Kemp CJ, Roberts JM. A pathway in quiescent cells that controls p27Kip1 stability, subcellular localization, and tumor suppression. Genes Dev 2006. January 1;20(1):47–64. 10.1101/gad.1384406 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Besson A, Hwang HC, Cicero S, Donovan SL, Gurian-West M, Johnson D, et al. Discovery of an oncogenic activity in p27Kip1 that causes stem cell expansion and a multiple tumor phenotype. Genes Dev 2007. January 1;21(1):1731–1746. 10.1101/gad.1556607 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Defoe DM, Adams LB, Sun J, Wisecarver SN, Levine EM. Defects in retinal pigment epithelium cell proliferation and retinal attachment in mutant mice with p27Kip1 ablation. Mol Vis. 2007. February 27;13:273–86. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berton S, Pellizzari I, Fabris L, D’Andrea S, Segatto I, Canzonieri V, et al. Genetic characterization of p27kip1 and stathmin in controlling cell proliferation in vivo. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(19):3100–11. 10.4161/15384101.2014.949512 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fabris L, Berton S, Pellizzari I, Segatto I, D’Andrea S, Armenia J, et al. p27kip1 controls H-Ras/MAPK activation and cell cycle entry via modulation of MT stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015. November 10;112(45):13916–21. 10.1073/pnas.1508514112 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vlach J, Hennecke S, Amati B. Phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. EMBO J. 1997. September 1;16(17):5334–44. 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5334 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zong H, Espinosa JS, Su HH, Muzumdar MD, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with double markers in mice. Cell. 2005. May 6;121(3):479–92. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tang SH, Silva FJ, Tsark WM, Mann JR. A Cre/loxP-deleter transgenic line in mouse strain 129S1/SvimJ. Genesis. 2002. March;32(3):199–202. 10.1002/gene.10030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Espinosa JS, Tea JS, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM) in mice. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2014. February 1;2014(2):182–9. 10.1101/pdb.prot080366 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zong H. Generation and applications of MADM-based mouse genetic mosaic system. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1194:187–201. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1215-5_10 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Muzumdar MD, Luo L, Zong H. Modeling sporadic loss of heterozygosity in mice by using mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. March 13;104(11)al:4495–500. 10.1073/pnas.0606491104 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lorincz A, Nusser Z. Molecular identity of dendritic voltage-gated sodium channels. Science. 2010. May 14;328:906–9. 10.1126/science.1187958 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Espinosa JS, Luo L. Timing neurogenesis and differentiation: Insights from quantitative clonal analyses of cerebellar granule cells. J Neurosci. 2008. March 5;28(10):2301–12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5157-07.2008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012. June 28;9(7):676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Simoudis E, Han J, Fayyad UM, editors. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96); AAAI Press; 1996. p. 226–231. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.121.9220. [ISBN 1-57735-004-9].
- 45.Germani F, Bergantinos C, Johnson LA. Mosaic analysis in Drosophila. Genetics. 2018. February;208(2):473–490. 10.1534/genetics.117.300256 Review. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Baldassarre G, Belletti B, Nicoloso MS, Schiappacassi M, Vecchione A, Spessotto P, et al. p27Kip1-stathmin interaction influences sarcoma cell migration and invasion. Cancer Cell. 2005. January;7(1):51–63. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Besson A, Gurian-West M, Schnidt A, Hall A, Roberts JM. p27Kip1 modulates cell migration through the regulation of RhoA activation. Genes Dev 2004. April 15;18(8):862–76. 10.1101/gad.1185504 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Olson MF, Ashworth A, Hall A. An essential role for Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases in cell cycle progression through G1. Science. 1995. September 1;269(5228):1270–2. 10.1126/science.7652575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yamamoto M, Marui N, Sakai T, Morii N, Kozaki S, Ikai K, et al. ADP-ribosylation of the rhoA gene product by botulinum C3 exoenzyme causes Swiss 3T3 cells to accumulate in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene. 1993. June;8(6):1449–55. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Coleman ML, Marshall CJ, Olson MF. RAS and RHO GTPases in G1-phase cell-cycle regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004. May;5(5):355–66. 10.1038/nrm1365 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Croft DR, Olson MF. The Rho GTPase effector ROCK regulates cyclin A, cyclin D1, and p27Kip1 levels by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2006. June;26(12):4612–27. 10.1128/MCB.02061-05 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Okumura N, Ueno M, Koizumi N, Sakamoto Y, Hirata K, Hamuro J, et al. Enhancement on primate corneal endothelial cell survival in vitro by a ROCK inhibitor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009. August;50(8):3680–7. 10.1167/iovs.08-2634 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Okumura N, Nakano S, Kay EP, Numata R, Ota A, Sowa Y, et al. Involvement of cyclin D and p27 in cell proliferation mediated by ROCK inhibitors Y-27632 and Y-39983 during corneal endothelium wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014. January 15;55(1):318–29. 10.1167/iovs.13-12225 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Okumura N, Koizumi N, Kay EP, Ueno M, Sakamoto Y, Nakamura S, et al. The ROCK inhibitor eye drop accelerates corneal endothelium wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013. April 3;54(4):2493–502. 10.1167/iovs.12-11320 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Okumura N, Inoue R, Okazaki Y, Nakano S, Nakagawa H, Kinoshita S, et al. Effect of the Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 on corneal endothelial wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015. September;56(10):6067–74. 10.1167/iovs.15-17595 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Okumura N, Okazaki Y, Inoue R, Kakutani K, Nakano S, Kinoshita S, et al. Effect of the Rho-associated kinase inhibitor eye drop (Ripasudil) on corneal endothelial wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016. March;57(3):1284–92. 10.1167/iovs.15-18586 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Meekins LC, Rosado-Adames N, Maddala R, Zhao JJ, Rao PV, Afshari NA. Corneal endothelial cell migration and proliferation enhanced by Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors in in vitro and in vivo models. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016. December 1;57(15):6731–38. 10.1167/iovs.16-20414 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhu YT, Chen HC, Chen SY, Tseng SC. Nuclear p120 catenin unlocks mitotic block of contact-inhibited human corneal endothelial monolayers without disrupting adherent junctions. J Cell Sci. 2012. August 1;125(Pt 15):3636–48. 10.1242/jcs.103267 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.McAllister SS, Becker-Hapak M, Pintucci G, Pagano M, Dowdy SF. Novel p27kip1 C-terminal scatter domain mediates Rac-dependent cell migration independent of cell cycle arrest functions. Mol Cell Biol. 2003. January;23(1):216–28. 10.1128/MCB.23.1.216-228.2003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nagahara H, Vocero-Akbani AM, Snyder EL, Ho A, Latham DG, Lissy NA, et al. Transduction of full-length TAT fusion proteins into mammalian cells: TAT-p27Kip1 induces cell migration. Nat Med. 1998. December;4(12):1449–52. 10.1038/4042 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kawauchi T, Chihama K, Nabeshima Y, Hoshino M. Cdk5 phosphorylates and stabilizes p27kip1 contributing to actin organization and cortical neuronal migration. Nat Cell Biol. 2006. January;8(1):17–26. 10.1038/ncb1338 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nguyen L, Besson A, Heng JI, Schuurmans C, Teboul L, Parras C, et al. p27kip1 independently promotes neuronal differentiation and migration in the cerebral cortex. Genes Dev. 2006. June 1;20(11):1511–24. 10.1101/gad.377106 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sheaff RJ, Groudine M, Gordon M, Roberts JM, Clurman BE. CyclinE-CDK2 is a regulator of p27Kip1. Genes Dev. 1997. June 1;11(11):1464–78. 10.1101/gad.11.11.1464 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.