Abstract
A series of inhibitors of the soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) containing imidazolidine-2,4,5-trione or pirimidine-2,4,6-trione has been synthesized. Inhibition potency of the described compounds ranges from 8.4 μM to 0.4 nM. The tested compounds possess higher water solubility than their preceding ureas. Molecular docking indicates new bond between the triones and the active site of sEH that in part explain the observed potency of the new pharmacophores. While less potent than the corresponding ureas, the modifications of urea group reported herein yield compounds with higher water solubility, thus permitting easier formulation.
Keywords: soluble epoxide hydrolase; epoxyeicosatrienoic acids; inhibitor; adamantane; urea; imidazolidine-2,4,5-trione; pirimidine-2,4,6-trione
Imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones were systematically studied as sEH inhibitors.
21 adamantyl imidazolidine-2,4,5- and pirimidine-2,4,6-triones were synthesized.
Molecular docking highlights possible new bonds with the enzyme.
Proposed that triones can act as a prodrugs releasing more potent ureas.
Graphical Abstract

The human soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) is involved in the metabolism of arachidonic acid epoxides and other natural epoxy-fatty acids,1 which have numerous, largely beneficial, biological activities.2 Through the addition of a water molecule, sEH converts epoxides into corresponding vicinal diols thus affecting inflammatory processes, pain and other disease states.2 Thereby inhibition of sEH could be beneficial in treatment of many renal, cardiovascular and neuronal diseases.3,4 Although thousands of various sEH inhibitors (sEHI) were synthesized over the last two decades5–7, they have limited solubility, making them hard to formulate, as well as limited bioavailability, especially toward the CNS where sEH is emerging as a potential target for neurological diseases.8 Toward improving water solubility and metabolic stability, herein, we changed the most common sEHI primary pharmacophore, an urea group, with imidazolidine-2,4,5-trione or pirimidine-2,4,6-trione groups and investigate the effects of such substitution on the potency and properties of the resulting compounds.
Urea-type sEH inhibitors bearing either adamantyl or aromatic moiety as lipophilic group both possess poor water solubility,9,10 that could be explained by the intermolecular interactions between urea molecules.11,12 Unfortunately the same hydrogen bond acceptors (HBAs) and hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) from the urea group are essential for sEH inhibition.13 However, we proposed that certain changes in the urea-group can improve water solubility while sustaining potency on a decent (nanomolar) level. Thus, we converted urea group in known sEH inhibitors into imidazolidine-2,4,5-trione or pirimidine-2,4,6-trione, because additional HBAs should enhance water solubility and prevent intermolecular interactions between urea molecules.
To synthesize imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones, the reaction of ureas with oxalyl chloride. Reaction was carried out in anhydrous THF for 2h with reflux (Scheme 1).14,15
Scheme 1.
Reagents and conditions: a. Oxalyl chloride (1.2 eq.), THF, 66 °C, 2 h.
In most cases imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones are significantly less active than the corresponding ureas, with loss of potency between 2.3 and 6,000 folds, except for compound 1c, which is as potent as the corresponding urea (Table 1). Imidazolidine-2,4,5-trione 1k (8.4 μM, 700-folds less active than the preceding urea) is the least active among compounds 1a-k. Presence of 5 HBAs in the molecule probably prevents it from entering the active site of the sEH. However, for compound 1c its activity equals activity of corresponding urea.
Table 1.
IC50 values and some physicochemical properties for imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones 1a-k and their corresponding ureas.
| # | Structure | mp (°C) | Solubility (μM)a | Human sEH IC50 (nM)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | ![]() |
212–214 | 280±10 | 86.8 |
| 1a* | ![]() |
194–19519 | 100±5 | 4.5 |
| 1b | ![]() |
295–296 | 210±10 | 7.7 |
| 1b* t-TUCB | ![]() |
244–2735 | 516 | 1±0.117 |
| 1c | ![]() |
205–207 | 250±10 | 0.4 |
| 1c* | ![]() |
241–2437 | 500±257 | 0.47 |
| 1d | ![]() |
155–158 | 250±10 | 6127 |
| 1d* | ![]() |
196–19711 | 85±511 | 1.011 |
| 1e | ![]() |
90–91 | 350±10 | 310.6 |
| 1e* | ![]() |
191–19211 | 65±511 | 0.711 |
| 1f | ![]() |
159–160 | 900±25 | 466.4 |
| 1f* | ![]() |
172–17311 | 55±511 | 55.611 |
| 1g | ![]() |
129–130 | 200±10 | 370.7 |
| 1g* | ![]() |
181–18211 | 65±511 | 3.611 |
| 1h | ![]() |
144–145 | 250±10 | 160.4 |
| 1h* | ![]() |
183–18411 | 85±511 | 94.211 |
| 1i | ![]() |
260–263 | 100±5 | 22.8 |
| 1i* | ![]() |
266–2687 | 20±57 | 9.67 |
| 1j | ![]() |
153–155 | 100±5 | 216.1 |
| 1j* | ![]() |
194–1967 | 40±57 | 13.87 |
| 1k | ![]() |
185–186 | 150±10 | 8417 |
| 1k* | ![]() |
273–274 | 1750±25 | 12.0 |
Solubilities were measured in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 M) containing 1% of DMSO.
Determined via a kinetic fluorescent assay. Results are means of three separate experiments.18
As expected, in most cases, the triones yielded more water soluble than the corresponding urea. Compound 1b is 40-fold more soluble than its corresponding urea (t-TUCB). However, in some cases (1c and 1k) triones were less soluble than its preceding ureas. In addition, melting points of triones were up to 101°C less then those for the corresponding ureas except for compounds 1a and 1b. Because in some conditions, triones can degrade back to the original ureas, the better physical properties of triones can enhanced their formulation as pro-drugs of urea-based sEHI.
It was previously showed that diureas, which contain two urea groups linked with aliphatic spacer are very potent sEHI.9 Molecular docking suggests that the high potency of these compounds is due to the binding of the second urea group with Ser374 of the sEH. We used diureas with various linkers between adamantane and urea fragments to synthesize corresponding di-imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones 2a-g and tri-imidazolidine-2,4,5-trione 2h (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
Reagents and conditions: a. Oxalyl chloride (1.2 eq.), THF, 66 °C, 2 h.
Data (Table 2) shows that the di-imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones 2a-h possess significantly lower melting points than those for corresponding ureas. Compounds 2f and 2g are liquid at room temperature, which suggests that their melting points are at least 193 and 167°C lower. The ureas are known to form intermolecular hydrogen bonds resulting in a brick wall fashion crystalline lattice. Thus, the strong decreased in melting point observed, coupled with the higher molecular weight of the imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones, illustrates a lower number of intermolecular interactions in the trione crystals. Therefore, the up to 115-fold decrease in inhibitory activity (except of compound 2d which is 2.2-fold more active than its preceding urea) of imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones is somewhat not surprising. As observed for the single triones (Table 1), the di-triones are also 16- and 9-fold more soluble in water than their corresponding diureas.
Table 2.
IC50 values and some physicochemical properties for imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones 2a-h and its corresponding preceding ureas.
| # | Structure | mp (°C) | Solubility (μM)a | Human sEH IC50 (nM)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2a | ![]() |
217–220 | 120±5 | 1.6 |
| 2a* | ![]() |
228–2309 | 25±59 | 0.69 |
| 2b | ![]() |
127–130 | 110±5 | 3.8 |
| 2b* | ![]() |
256–2589 | 30±59 | 0.99 |
| 2c | ![]() |
118–121 | 90±5 | 8.4 |
| 2c* | 210–2139 | n/a | 2.39 | |
| 2d | 122–125 | 100±5 | 649.6 | |
| 2d* | 130–1319 | n/a | 1442.69 | |
| 2e | 39–40 | 900±25 | 294.4 | |
| 2e* | 229–2307 | 100±107 | 3.47 | |
| 2f | n/ac | 1300±25 | 92.0 | |
| 2f* | 192–1937 | 80±107 | 0.87 | |
| 2g | n/ac | 600±10 | 438.1 | |
| 2g* | 166–1677 | 75±57 | 1.57 | |
| 2h | ![]() |
167–168 | 650±25 | 80.3 |
| 2h* | ![]() |
222–223 | 70±5 | 6.7 |
Solubilities were measured in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 M) containing 1% of DMSO.
Determined via a kinetic fluorescent assay. Results are means of three separate experiments.18
Liquid compounds. Do not crystallize at −20°C.
To rationalize the activity and solubility trends in the current data sets of sEH inhibitors we performed a classic QSAR study based on fragment descriptors and regularized linear regression. The obtained model is satisfactory and can explain some features of the data set and the calculated F-statistics values confirmed the significance of the constructed models and the quality of the constructed models is satisfactory. The fragment descriptors which showed non-zero coefficients in the descriptor selection procedure are shown at Fig. 1 (A) (activity). The only descriptors which demonstrates suitable significance level in a t-test are frag7 (p = 0.07) and frag10 (p = 0.002). Their influence may be interpreted in the following way: frag7 can be found in compounds which contain N-adamantylurea fragments which is easily accommodated in the sEH active site and form hydrogen bonds with Asp335 and Tyr383, while unsubstituted N-adamantyl-imidazolidine-trione containing compounds contain frag10 and, according to the docking results, have an alternative binding mode to the enzyme. Asp335 can exist in two different conformations in sEH active site: the most stable is highlighted by red color (Fig 2 (A)) it forms two hydrogen bonds with the backbone amides of Trp336 and Gly266 and the other one is shown at Fig 2 (A) with ordinary color scheme. The latter one is observed for the binding mode of compounds 2a where one of carbonyl oxygens forms hydrogen bonds with the backbone amides of Trp336 and Gly266 substituting Asp335 side chain. Thus, the number of hydrogen bonds between the enzyme and the ligand are roughly the same for 2a and its urea derivative 2a*. The urea derivative forms two hydrogen bonds with Asp335 while one of the carbonyl oxygens of 2a forms two hydrogen bonds with the backbone amide groups of Trp336 and Phe267.
Figure 1.
(A) Molecular fragments have non-zero coefficients in the final regression equation for pIC50. Central atom of each fragment is highlighted by blue color, the aliphatic carbon atoms are labeled by grey color while the aromatic ones are colored with yellow; (B) The final prediction results of the final model, the possible outlier is shown in red color; (C) The structural formula of the possible outlier.
Figure 2.
(A) The binding mode of the compound 2a. Black points show the hydrogen bonds which compound 2a maintain with protein residues. The green circle labels atoms which are in close proximity to each other. (B) The superposition of the docked structured of 2a and its urea derivative in the binding site.
Finally, we synthesized two pirimidine-2,4,6-triones 3a and 3b (Scheme 3) by substituting oxalyl chloride with malonyl chloride in the above described reaction.
Scheme 3.
Reagents and conditions: a. Malonyl chloride (1.2 eq.), THF, 66 °C, 2 h.
Compound 3a is more active than compound 3b (Table 3), confirming that a single methylene spacer between the adamantane and the primary pharmacophore lead to increase of the inhibitory activity.9 Both pirimidine-2,4,6-triones 3a and 3b show higher inhibitory activity against sEH when compared to the corresponding imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones 1e and 1d (Table 1), but they are up to 100-fold less active than the corresponding ureas. Pirimidine-2,4,6-triones 3a and 3b are 21 and 10-fold more soluble than the ureas and approximately 4-fold more soluble than the corresponding imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones 1d and 1e. Because, like the imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones in some conditions, the pirimidine-2,4,6-triones can degrade back to the original ureas, the better physical properties of the triones can enhanced their formulation as pro-drugs of urea-based sEHI.
Table 3.
The obtained regression equations for activity and solubility
| Outcome type | Equation | Q2 | R2 | RMSEcv | F-value | |||
| Activity (pIC50) | pIC50 = 7.386 − 0.174616 * counts_frag1 − 0.069048 * counts_frag2 − 0.043058 * counts_frag3 + 0.002409 * counts frag4 + 0.015568 * counts frag5 + 0.106981 * counts frag6 + 0.107737 * counts frag7 + 0.113848 * counts frag8 + 0.177734 * counts frag9 + 0.196090 * counts_frag10 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 5.72 | |||
| descriptor | Std. error | t-value | p-value | |||||
| intercept | 0.81 | 9.01 | < 10−6 | |||||
| frag1 | 0.19 | −1.5565 | 0.12 | |||||
| frag2 | 0.16 | −0.6346 | 0.53 | |||||
| frag3 | 0.09 | −0.7240 | 0.47 | |||||
| frag4 | 0.03 | 0.2218 | 0.83 | |||||
| frag5 | 0.07 | 0.8327 | 0.41 | |||||
| frag6 | 0.11 | 0.9326 | 0.36 | |||||
| frag7 | 0.08 | 1.8443 | 0.07 | |||||
| frag8 | 0.22 | 1.1164 | 0.27 | |||||
| frag9 | 0.20 | 0.6367 | 0.53 | |||||
| frag10 | 0.08 | 3.2223 | 0.002 | |||||
Series of imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones and primidine-2,4,6-triones were synthesized and investigated for their inhibitory activity against sEH as well as their physical properties. Synthesized compounds are less active than its preceding ureas but possess higher water solubility and lower melting point. Molecular docking with the new compounds highlights possible new bonds with the enzyme that could be used to increase potency. In addition, the new pharmacophore yield molecules that should easier to formulate, and that could be used as pro-drugs for urea-based inhibitor of sEH.
Supplementary Material
Table 4.
IC50 values and some physicochemical properties for pirimidine-2,4,6-triones 3a and 3b and its corresponding preceding ureas.
| # | Structure | mp (°C) | Solubility (μM)a | Human sEH IC50 (nM)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a | ![]() |
90–91 | 1400±50 | 61.0 |
| 1a* | ![]() |
191–19211 | 65±511 | 0.711 |
| 3b | ![]() |
115–116 | 900±50 | 210.4 |
| 1b* | ![]() |
196–19711 | 85±511 | 1.011 |
Solubilities were measured in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 M) containing 1% of DMSO.
Determined via a kinetic fluorescent assay. Results are means of three separate experiments.18
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Russian Fund for Basic Research (grant number 18-43-343002), Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (base part of state assignment for 2017-2019; project no. 4.7491.2017/BCh), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) grant R35 ES030443, and NIEHS Superfund Research Program grant P42 ES004699.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References and Notes
- 1.Arand M; Grant DF; Beetham JK; Friedberg T; Oesch F; Hammock BD FEBS Lett. 1994, 338, 251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Imig JD; Zhao X; Zaharis CZ; Olearczyk JJ; Pollock DM; Newman JW; Kim IH; Watanabe T; Hammock BD Hypertension. 2005, 46, 975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fleming I; Rueben A; Popp R; Fisslthaler B; Schrodt S; Sander A; Haendeler J; Falck JR; Morisseau C; Hammock BD; Busse R Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 2007, 27, 2612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Imig JD Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol 2008, 4, 165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hwang SH; Tsai HJ; Liu JY; Morisseau C; Hammock BD J. Med. Chem 2007, 50, 3825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morisseau C; Goodrow MH; Newman JW; Wheelock CE; Dowdy DL; Hammock BD Biochem. Pharm 2002, 63,1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; Harris TR; Butov G; Hammock BD Bioorg. Chem 2018, 76, 510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zarriello S; Tuazon JP; Corey S; Schimmel S; Rajani M; Gorsky A; Incontri D; Hammock BD; Borlongan CV Prog. Neurobiol 2018, 172, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; Lee KSS; Shihadih DS; Harris TR; Butov GM; Hammock BD Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 2014, 24, 2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hwang SH; Wecksler AT; Zhang G; Morisseau C; Nguyen LV; Fu SH; Hammock BD Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett, 2013, 23, 3732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Burmistrov V; Morisseau C; D’yachenko V; Rybakov VB; Butov GM; Hammock BD J. Fluor. Chem 2019, 220, 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Custelcean R Chem. Commun 2008, 295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kodani SD; Bhakta S; Hwang SH; Pakhomova S; Newcomer ME; Morisseau C; Hammock BD Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2018, 28, 762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.D’yachenko VS; Burmistrov VV; Nishi K; Kim I-H; Butov GM Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. 2017, 53(10), 1080. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kratky M; Mandikova J; Trejtnar F; Buchta V; Stolařikova J; Vinšova J Chem. Pap 2015, 69, 1108. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wagner K; Inceoglu B; Dong H; Yang J; Hwang SH; Jones P; Morisseau C; Hammock BD Eur. J. Pharm 2013, 700, 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ulu A; Appt SE; Morisseau C; Hwang SH; Jones PD; Rose TE; Dong H; Lango J; Yang J; Tsai HJ; Miyabe C; Fortenbach C; Adams MR; Hammock BD British J. Pharm 2012, 165, 1401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jones PD; Wolf NM; Morisseau C; Whetstone P; Hock B; Hammock BD Anal. Biochem 2005, 343, 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burmistrov VV; Rasskazova EV; D’yachenko VS; Vernigora AA; Butov GM Russ. J. Org. Chem 2019, 55, 1229. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






































