Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder that has been ranked as the 4th leading cause of disability worldwide. Past clinical and laboratory evidence has confirmed that abnormalities of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis are involved in MDD development. In this study, we took advantage of corticosterone treatment of PC12 cells as a model to identify genes regulated by HPA-axis hormones. Next-generation RNA-Seq technology was utilized to explore genome-wide differentially expressed gene profiles between control and corticosterone treated PC12 cells. 1,274 genes with at least two-fold expression level change were identified. Gene ontology analysis showed that the top enriched biological processes included response to glucocorticoid signaling, apoptosis, cell division/DNA replication, and neuron projection/axon guidance, highly consistent with phenotypes of PC12 cells treated with corticosterone. Taken together, RNA-seq data is reliable and comprehensive, thus providing a valuable resource for understanding underlying mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced neuron malfunction.
Keywords: Corticosterone, PC12 cells, RNA-Seq, gene expression profiling
Introduction
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis refers to a set of direct stimulus and feedback between the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenal glands. Glucocorticoid is released by the adrenal cortex and plays critical roles in regulating inflammation and controlling stress [1]. In past years, many studies have reported the involvement of human HPA-axis (the glucocorticoid signaling) in the etiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder which has become the 4th leading cause of disability worldwide [2-5]. Previous studies have demonstrated that even though optimal doses of glucocorticoids enhance neural plasticity and spatial memory behavior, higher doses or sustained treatment with low doses can induce neuronal cell toxicity [6]. Long term use of synthetic glucocorticoids in clinics for immune suppression increases risk of MDD [7]. Recent studies have also found that glucocorticoids could significantly increase the amount of mitochondrial DNA and reduce the length of telomeres in an experimental animal model, both of which are consequences of stress and represent molecular markers for MDD [8-10].
Glucocorticoids impact the nervous systems in many aspects including stress response in neurons [11], neurotransmitter synthesis [12], neuronal survival [13], and neuronal differentiation [14]. Corticosterone, the main HPA-axis glucocorticoid hormone in rodents, plays a similar role in regulating animal stress responses. As shown in previous animal experiments, corticosterone is an adaptation-related biomarker during chronic stress [15].
The PC12 cell line, derived from pheochromocytoma of the rat adrenal medulla, is a widely used in vitro model for investigation of neuronal differentiation, neuro-secretion, and other neuro-biochemical and -biological events [16-18]. Nerve growth factor (NGF)-treated PC12 cells differentiate into chromaffin-like cells with noradrenergic phenotype through activation of distinct molecular signaling pathways [18,19]. Differentiated cells have many properties similar to those of sympathetic neurons such as proliferation cessation, neurite outgrowth, and electrical activity [19]. With an especially great abundance of glucocorticoid receptors and typical features of brain neurons, PC12 cells exhibits an excellent cellular model for investigating underlying molecular mechanisms by which glucocorticoids impact neuronal cell survival, differentiation, and morphogenesis [20].
Although solid evidence has demonstrated that HPA-axis hormones directly respond to unpredictable stress by elevating extracellular glucocorticoid levels and, thereafter, affect neuronal cell morphology and function, the underlying molecular mechanisms still require further investigation. Our study applied next-generation RNA-Seq technology to comparatively study differentially expressed gene profiles between corticosterone treated and control PC12 cells, aiming to identify all responsive genes and decipher the underlying mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced depression.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
PC12 cells were obtained from the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing, China). They were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), 5% horse serum (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin in a water-saturated atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells were seeded in a 60 mm dish at a density of 1×106 cells/dish for all experiments and cultured in serum-free medium for 12 hours before drug treatment.
Corticosterone treatment
Corticosterone was purchased from SIGMA-ALDRICH (Saint Louis, MO, USA). As described in previous studies [21], PC12 cells with 50% confluency were incubated with 50 μM corticosterone for 24 hours.
3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay
After corticosterone treatment, MTT assay was performed to detect cell viability [22]. In brief, PC12 cells were incubated with 5 mg/ml MTT (15 μl/well) at 37°C for 4 hours. The cultural medium was removed after incubation and cells were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (1:1,000). Formazan reduction products were measured by obtaining the absorbance at 570 nm in a microplate reader. Six replicates were performed in each group. Data were collected from three independent experiments.
RNA-sequencing
Total RNAs of control and corticosterone treated PC12 cells were extracted by using TRIzol (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). The quantity and quality of extracted RNAs were evaluated using NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara CA, USA), and RNA electropherograms with calculation of RNA integrity number (RIN), respectively (Schroeder et al. 2006). RNA samples were subjected to next generation RNA-sequencing if their RIN > 7 and total RNA quantity > 400 ng. Six sequencing libraries (3 replicates for both control and corticosterone treatment groups) were constructed by using NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) with poly (A) messenger RNA selection. The libraries were then used to build clusters on the Illumina flow cell, according to manufacturer protocol. Sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2500 System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a 125 bp paired-end sequencing strategy.
RNA-Seq data analysis
The quality of raw sequencing reads was evaluated using FastQC package. Adapters and low quality reads were removed by using Trimmomatic [23]. Cleaned reads were mapped into rat reference genome and transcriptome downloaded from the UCSC Genome Browser (http://www.genome.ucsc.edu) using Tophat2 with no more than 5 mismatches for each alignment [24,25]. Gene expression levels were determined by the number of fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (FPKM) using Cufflinks [26] Cross comparison and data merging were performed using Cuffmerge, resulting in a comprehensive transcriptome database for each group. Differentially expressed genes with Log2 (fold change of FPKM) were determined by cufflinks and identified using Circos, version 0.66 (http://circos.ca/) [27].
Functional annotation analysis of identified target genes
Identified differentially expressed genes were subjected to functional annotation analysis using DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/summary.jsp) to identify enriched biological processes and KEGG pathways.
Results
Corticosterone treatment reduced PC12 cell viability and neurite growth
To examine the effects of corticosterone on cell viability and neurite growth, we incubated PC12 cells with 50 μM corticosterone or vehicle control for 24 hours. In contrast to control cells which showed extended outgrowth of neurites, neurites of corticosterone treated cells were much shorter, or had even disappeared (Figure 1A). MTT assay revealed that corticosterone reduced cell viability by 50% (Figure 1B), consistent with the images observed (Figure 1A). These data demonstrated that corticosterone treatment inhibited PC12 cell growth and neurite extension.
Figure 1.

Effect of corticosterone treatment on PC12 cell survival and neurite growth. PC12 cells were treated with vehicle control or 50 μM corticosterone for 24 hours. A. Microscopic images of PC12 cell neurites. B. MTT assay results. There was a significant difference in the number of live cells between control and treatment groups (P < 0.01).
Identification of differentially expressed genes by RNA-Seq
To decipher underlying molecular mechanisms of the effect of glucocorticoids on PC12 cell growth, we performed RNA-seq to identify genome-wide differentially expressed genes between control and corticosterone treated PC12 cells. A total of 46,306,299 and 43,502,882 reads were obtained for the control and corticosterone treated groups, respectively, covering around 95% of total mapped transcriptome (Table 1). Clustering assembly of sequencing data for both control and treatment groups generated 33,737 records with 89.9% of multiple exon transcriptomes compared to a total of 35,891 rat known genes. Differential gene expression analysis using FPKM identified 1,274 genes with at least 2-fold change in the corticosterone treated group compared to that of the control group (FDR < 0.05), including 627 downregulated and 647 upregulated genes (data not shown).
Table 1.
Mapped transcriptome reads of paired-end RNA-Seq in both control and corticosterone treated PC12 cells
| Sample groups | Total reads number | Left mapped reads | Right mapped reads | Total mapped reads | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |||
| Control | 1 | 14,926,691 | 13,644,136 | 91 | 13,137,946 | 88 | 14,352,417 | 96 |
| 2 | 14,856,540 | 13,635,007 | 92 | 13,188,946 | 89 | 14,236,841 | 96 | |
| 3 | 16,523,068 | 14,961,440 | 91 | 14,374,881 | 87 | 15,687,269 | 95 | |
| Total control | 46,306,299 | 42,240,583 | 91 | 40,701,773 | 88 | 44,276,527 | 96 | |
| Treated | 1 | 17,667,615 | 16,009,459 | 91 | 15,489,222 | 88 | 16,781,244 | 95 |
| 2 | 14,021,101 | 12,807,465 | 91 | 12,324,597 | 88 | 13,403,884 | 96 | |
| 3 | 11,814,166 | 10,673,710 | 90 | 10,256,811 | 87 | 11,179,928 | 95 | |
| Total treated | 43,502,882 | 39,490,634 | 91 | 38,070,630 | 88 | 41,365,056 | 95 | |
Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of identified target genes
We next performed GO analysis to identify key biological processes in which differentially expressed genes were participating. Among the top five biological processes identified for the 647 upregulated genes (Table 2), two were directly related with glucocorticoid signals: Cellular response to dexamethasone stimulus and response to glucocorticoid. The data confirmed that RNA-seq was very successful. Consistent with glucocorticoid functions, the remaining three were all related with stress including one process in regulation of angiogenesis, one in response to hypoxia, and one to starvation. Furthermore, we also found many other intriguing processes (Table 3). For instance, genes involved in apoptosis were significantly enriched, which could explain why and how corticosterone treatment inhibits PC12 cell survival. Other interesting biological processes included negative regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade, negative regulation of MAPK cascade, nervous system development, and axon extension involved in axon guidance. MAPK pathway has been reported to be involved in neuron axon branching and cellular stress (REF). Therefore, it is highly possible that MAPK signaling is one of the pathways mediating the inhibitory effect of corticosterone on PC12 cell neurite outgrowth.
Table 2.
Top 5 enriched biological processes for upregulated genes induced by corticosterone treatment
| GO Term ~ Biological Process | Genes | N (%) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0071549 Cellular response to dexamethasone stimulus | ICAM1, ASS1, SERPINF1, ABCB1B, SERPINE1, FOXO1, BCL2L1, TRIM63, AQP1, ASL, ERRFI1, DDIT4 | 12 (1.9) | 3.02E-06 |
| GO:0045766 Positive regulation of angiogenesis | PRKCA, HYAL1, RAMP2, LGALS3, C3, PGF, AQP1, PTGIS, ADM, HIPK2, SERPINE1, RHOB, ZC3H12A, RRAS, THBS1, CTSH | 16 (2.5) | 6.97E-06 |
| GO:0001666 Response to hypoxia | CAV1, ALAD, AHCY, PGF, ALDOC, BCL2L1, CITED2, PTGIS, KDM3A, LIMD1, PAK1, ICAM1, RAMP2, CYP1A1, CRYAB, VHL, CST3, UBE2B, PRKCD, DDIT4, ITPR2, PENK, ADM, ABCB1B, PSEN2 | 25 (3.9) | 1.10E-05 |
| GO:0042594 Response to starvation | ZFP36, ADSSL1, SORBS1, ADM, ULK1, SERPINE1, NUCB2, PDK4, AK3, FSTL1 | 10 (1.6) | 5.24E-05 |
| GO:0051384 Response to glucocorticoid | CXCL1, BCKDHA, CAV1, ALAD, ASS1, C3, IL6R, TRIM63, CTSL, DUSP1, ADM, S100B, SULT1A1, LCAT, PIK3R1 | 15 (2.4) | 1.27E-04 |
Table 3.
Other interesting enriched biological processes for upregulated genes induced by corticosterone treatment
| GO Term ~ Biological Process | Genes | N (%) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0006915 Apoptotic process | STEAP3, ADAMTSL4, ALDOC, FOXO1, RTKN, FOXO3, BCL2L1, SQSTM1, ZC3H12A, RHOB, PAK1, DPEP1, AATK, PRKCA, SGK1, CST3, NR4A1, PIM3, PRKCD, DDIT4, PLEKHF1, ARRB1, SIAH3, CTSH, ADAM15 | 25 (3.9) | 0.001 |
| GO:0070373 Negative regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade | CAV1, SPRY1, DUSP1, VRK3, ARRB1, NDRG2, TNIP1, ERRFI1, RGS14 | 9 (1.4) | 0.001 |
| GO:0043407 Negative regulation of MAP kinase activity | CAV1, SPRY1, DUSP1, PRKCD, FEM1A, RGS14 | 6 (0.9) | 0.014 |
| GO:0007399 Nervous system development | ENC1, MAP1B, CSRP1, MAFK, GAS7, SLC7A5, NUMBL, CNTF, TPP1, TNR, GPSM1, ZC3H12A, NDRG2, DCLK1 | 14 (2.2) | 0.015 |
| GO:0007409 Axonogenesis | OGN, RAB3A, KLF7, ULK1, MAP1B, PAK1, SLIT1, DCLK1, NUMBL | 9 (1.4) | 0.04 |
In contrast to upregulated genes involved in multiple biological processes and molecular functions, all of the top five enriched biological processes from downregulated genes were involved in inhibition of DNA replication and cell division (Table 4). This finding indicates that besides inducing apoptosis, inhibiting cell proliferation is another mechanism contributing to impaired cell survival and growth caused by corticosterone treatment.
Table 4.
Top 5 enriched biological processes for downregulated genes induced by corticosterone treatment
| GO Term~ Biological Process | Genes | N (%) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0051301 Cell division | CKS1B, KIFC1, FZR1, ANAPC15, AURKA, PTTG1, KIF2C, SPC25, CCNE1, NCAPH, CDC45, CDCA8, CDCA2, SKA3, CDCA4, CDCA3, CDC7, KIF14, CDC6, CDK1, RAN, DSN1, LIG1, CCNF, NUF2, KIF18B, CDC20, SPDL1, BIRC5, KNSTRN, CDK2, MCM5, NCAPD2, CDC25B, CCNB1, CCND1, TIMELESS, SPAG5, CKS1L, CKS2, BUB1B, CENPW, CENPT, HAUS8, UBE2S | 45 (7.3) | 7.20E-27 |
| GO:0006260 DNA replication | TICRR, POLA1, POLA2, RPA1, RPA2, MCM8, MCM7, PRIM2, NS5ATP9, ORC1, FEN1, RECQL4, GINS1, LIG1, NASP, GINS3, POLE, FAM111A, GINS4, RBBP7, BRCA1, MCM6, RFC3, RFC2, RRM2, POLD1, RRM1, POLD2 | 28 (4.5) | 1.91E-20 |
| GO:0006270 DNA replication initiation | CDC7, CDC6, GINS4, POLA1, TOPBP1, MCM2, POLA2, MCM10, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6, CCNE1, CDC45, MCM7, ORC6 | 16 (2.6) | 4.06E-18 |
| GO:0007059 Chromosome segregation | KIF11, NEK2L1, NEK2, CENPF, NDC80, BIRC5, ESPL1, CENPE, PMF1, PTTG1, RCC1, KNSTRN, BRCA1, SPC25, HJURP, SPAG5, BUB1, CDCA2, CENPW, SKA3, CENPT, CDK5RAP2, TOP2A | 23 (3.7) | 3.68E-17 |
| GO:0000070 Mitotic sister chromatid segregation | NEK2L1, NEK2, DSN1, KIF18A, NUSAP1, KIF18B, ESPL1, KNSTRN, CDCA8, MAD2L1, SPAG5, CENPA, PLK1, NSL1, CIT | 15 (2.4) | 1.37E-15 |
We also analyzed differentially expressed genes for enrichment of KEGG pathways (Table 5). The top two enriched pathways from upregulated genes were ECM-receptor interaction and focal adhesion, indicating that interaction and signaling between cells and the extracellular matrix are very important for the effects of corticosterone. Interestingly, we found that many metabolic pathways were enriched during treatment. It will be interesting to examine the effects and/or mechanisms of various metabolic pathways involved in corticosterone-induced impairment of cell survival and neurite growth.
Table 5.
Top 5 enriched KEGG pathways for upregulated genes induced by corticosterone treatment
| KEGG pathway | Genes | N (%) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| rno04512 ECM-receptor interaction | COL4A2, COL4A1, ITGA10, SDC4, LAMB2, LAMA5, ITGA5, TNR, ITGA7, COL6A2, COL6A1, SV2B, LAMC1, THBS1 | 14 (2.2) | 1.95E-05 |
| rno04510 Focal adhesion | PRKCA, COL4A2, CAV1, COL4A1, PGF, ITGA10, FLNC, VAV2, PXN, LAMB2, ITGA5, LAMA5, TNR, ITGA7, COL6A2, COL6A1, PAK1, LAMC1, THBS1, PIK3R1 | 20 (3.1) | 2.50E-04 |
| rno00280 Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation | BCKDHA, BCAT1, MCCC2, ALDH6A1, IVD, MCCC1, AOX1, ALDH2, AUH | 9 (1.4) | 8.18E-04 |
| rno01230 Biosynthesis of amino acids | BCAT1, GLUL, ASS1, ALDOC, SDSL, ENO2, PFKM, PSAT1, ASL, GPT2, PC | 11 (1.7) | 8.71E-04 |
| rno01100 Metabolic pathways | SAT1, GDA, ALAD, OGDHL, QARS, ACSS2, AUH, MCCC2, PTGIS, ST3GAL5, ST3GAL4, XYLT1, MCCC1, AGPAT4, GPT2, HYAL1, ALDH6A1, PLD1, CYP1A1, FAXDC2, NDUFC2, PNPLA2, PFKM, LPIN1, ACADVL, GLUL, PLCE1, PRDX6, PLA2G2A, GAA, KDSR, INPP4A, MPST, BCAT1, XDH, AHCY, ASS1, GALNT7, ALDOC, CERS6, CTPS2, ASL, EXTL1, MTMR2, CSAD, IVD, ENO2, ALDH4A1, PNPO, BDH2, RGD1566085, BCKDHA, ADSSL1, PLB1, SDSL, UAP1L1, AMPD3, TST, POLD4, MLYCD, ATP6V1E1, AOX1, ALDH2, GAMT, PSAT1, DCXR, PC, NNMT | 68 (10.7) | 0.002 |
Discussion
For our study, we obtained a total of 9G bps of transcriptomes by RNA-Seq, representing about 50X sequencing depth of rat transcriptome, based on final assembling results. Such sequencing depth provides a greater number of repeat sequence reads for individual genes which confers much better accuracy and reliability to the sequencing data.
GO analysis further confirmed that our RNA-seq data were very comprehensive and successful in identification of genes differentially expressed in response to corticosterone in PC12 cells. Top enriched biological processes from upregulated genes include responses to dexamethasone stimulus and glucocorticoids, exactly reflecting cellular responses to corticosterone treatment (Table 2). Our sequencing data also elegantly explained the phenotypes of PC12 upon corticosterone administration. Consistent with the observation that corticosterone dramatically reduced live PC12 cell numbers, we identified highly enriched differentially expressed genes promoting apoptosis and inhibiting cell division, consistent with known functions and mechanisms of glucocorticoid signaling (Table 3) [28]. However, it is interesting that we also identified many downregulated genes involved in DNA replication and chromosome segregation (Table 4), which would suggest new functions/mechanisms of glucocorticoids that are worthy of further examination in the future. In accordance with the impairment of neurite outgrowth conferred by glucocorticoids, RNA-seq data also showed significant enrichment of genes involved in neuron projection and axon guidance. Many of them had not been identified as regulated by glucocorticoids before (Table 3 and data not shown). For instance, SEMA4B and SEMA3F are well established molecules involved in axon guidance [29] but their roles in glucocorticoid signaling have hardly been studied.
Taken together, our RNA-seq data are highly reliable and provide a complete resource for investigating mechanisms of glucocorticoid signaling on neuronal cell survival, differentiation, and morphogenesis. We have previously demonstrated by quantitative PCR that expression levels of four MAPK pathway genes were significantly increased after corticosterone stimulation. In the future, it will be interesting to examine the roles of novel molecules and pathways and/or processes, aiming to identify new mechanisms of glucocorticoid signaling in neurons.
This study contributes to the understanding of underlying mechanisms of MDD since glucocorticoid signaling is a factor greatly involved in the development of MDD. Impairment of neuronal cell survival and neurite outgrowth caused by glucocorticoids would without doubt adversely affect neuronal cell function and signal transduction. Therefore, identifying underlying mechanisms would potentially shed new light in the development of therapeutic strategies for MDD.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Beijing Academy of Science and Technology Overseas Talent Special Funding Project (OTP-2013-002), Beijing Academy of Science and Technology Key Projects Funding (20130-12), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81673737), and Southeastern Faculty Research Grant (A-6-0502-1612-005). Drs. Ming-Zhen Li, Li Li and Ning Wu made equal contributions to this work and all are listed as corresponding authors.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Turnbull AV, Rivier CL. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by cytokines: actions and mechanisms of action. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:1–71. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA. Annual research review: a meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56:345–65. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Flaxman AD, Johns N, Burstein R, Murray CJ, Vos T. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382:1575–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61611-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Plotsky PM, Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB. Psychoneuroendocrinology of depression. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1998;21:293–307. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Young EA, Korszun A. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in mood disorders. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2002;31:63–78. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(01)00002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Du J, Wang Y, Hunter R, Wei Y, Blumenthal R, Falke C, Khairova R, Zhou R, Yuan P, Machado-Vieira R, McEwen BS, Manji HK. Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial function by glucocorticoids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3543–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812671106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Celano CM, Freudenreich O, Fernandez-Robles C, Stern TA, Caro MA, Huffman JC. Depressogenic effects of medications: a review. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13:109–25. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.1/ccelano. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cai N, Chang S, Li Y, Li Q, Hu J, Liang J, Song L, Kretzschmar W, Gan X, Nicod J, Rivera M, Deng H, Du B, Li K, Sang W, Gao J, Gao S, Ha B, Ho HY, Hu C, Hu J, Hu Z, Huang G, Jiang G, Jiang T, Jin W, Li G, Li K, Li Y, Li Y, Li Y, Lin YT, Liu L, Liu T, Liu Y, Liu Y, Lu Y, Lv L, Meng H, Qian P, Sang H, Shen J, Shi J, Sun J, Tao M, Wang G, Wang G, Wang J, Wang L, Wang X, Wang X, Yang H, Yang L, Yin Y, Zhang J, Zhang K, Sun N, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhong H, Breen G, Wang J, Marchini J, Chen Y, Xu Q, Xu X, Mott R, Huang GJ, Kendler K, Flint J. Molecular signatures of major depression. Curr Biol. 2015;25:1146–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tomiyama AJ, O’Donovan A, Lin J, Puterman E, Lazaro A, Chan J, Dhabhar FS, Wolkowitz O, Kirschbaum C, Blackburn E, Epel E. Does cellular aging relate to patterns of allostasis? An examination of basal and stress reactive HPA axis activity and telomere length. Physiol Behav. 2012;106:40–5. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choi J, Fauce SR, Effros RB. Reduced telomerase activity in human T lymphocytes exposed to cortisol. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22:600–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Q, Van Heerikhuize J, Aronica E, Kawata M, Seress L, Joels M, Swaab DF, Lucassen PJ. Glucocorticoid receptor protein expression in human hippocampus; stability with age. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1662–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McEwen BS, De Kloet ER, Rostene W. Adrenal steroid receptors and actions in the nervous system. Physiol Rev. 1986;66:1121–88. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1986.66.4.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gould E, Tanapat P. Stress and hippocampal neurogenesis. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:1472–9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00247-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Glick RD, Medary I, Aronson DC, Scotto KW, Swendeman SL, La Quaglia MP. The effects of serum depletion and dexamethasone on growth and differentiation of human neuroblastoma cell lines. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:465–72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)90216-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gong S, Miao YL, Jiao GZ, Sun MJ, Li H, Lin J, Luo MJ, Tan JH. Dynamics and correlation of serum cortisol and corticosterone under different physiological or stressful conditions in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Das KP, Freudenrich TM, Mundy WR. Assessment of PC12 cell differentiation and neurite growth: a comparison of morphological and neurochemical measures. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004;26:397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nishina A, Kimura H, Tsukagoshi H, Kozawa K, Koketsu M, Ninomiya M, Sato D, Obara Y, Furukawa S. Neurite outgrowth of PC12 cells by 4’-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-3’,4-dimethoxychalcone from brassica rapa L. ‘hidabeni’ was enhanced by pretreatment with p38MAPK inhibitor. Neurochem Res. 2013;38:2397–407. doi: 10.1007/s11064-013-1152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vaudry D, Stork PJ, Lazarovici P, Eiden LE. Signaling pathways for PC12 cell differentiation: making the right connections. Science. 2002;296:1648–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1071552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fujita K, Lazarovici P, Guroff G. Regulation of the differentiation of PC12 pheochromocytoma cells. Environ Health Perspect. 1989;80:127–42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8980127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Terada K, Kojima Y, Watanabe T, Izumo N, Chiba K, Karube Y. Inhibition of nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells by dexamethasone: signaling pathways through the glucocorticoid receptor and phosphorylated Akt and ERK1/2. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li M, Zhou J, Qian J, Cheng X, Wu H, Li L, Qian C, Su J, Wu D, Burns L, Golden T, Wu N. Target genes involved in corticosterone-induced PC12 cell viability and neurite disorders: a potential molecular mechanism of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2016;235:206–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhu W, Ma S, Qu R, Kang D. Antidepressant-like effect of saponins extracted from Chaihu-jia-longgu-muli-tang and its possible mechanism. Life Sci. 2006;79:749–56. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with tophat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–45. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schmidt S, Rainer J, Ploner C, Presul E, Riml S, Kofler R. Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis and glucocorticoid resistance: molecular mechanisms and clinical relevance. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(Suppl 1):S45–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koropouli E, Kolodkin AL. Semaphorins and the dynamic regulation of synapse assembly, refinement, and function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;27:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
