Abstract
Objective: Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma (WDFA) is a rare pulmonary carcinoma with low malignancy and favorable prognosis. All cases were collected, analyzed and summarized to better understand this disease. Methods: We used the keywords “fetal adenocarcinoma” and “epithelial pulmonary blastoma (EPB)” to search WANFANG MED ONLINE, CNKI and NCBI PUBMED for cases reported by Chinese authors from 1987 to July 2015. Results: A total of 64 cases reported in China were reviewed, and the details of the clinicopathological features of 45 cases were summarized. Among these 45 patients, 23 (23/45, 51.1%) patients were male and 22 (22/45, 48.9%) patients were female. The mean age at diagnosis was 35 ± 15 years old (range, 6-72 years old) with a bimodal peak in the second and third decades. Furthermore, 24 tumors (24/31, 77.4%) were found to have progressed past stage I, while only three (3/45, 6.7%) tumors had lymph nodes metastases. These tumor cells were 100% reactive for keratin, β-catenin, Napsin A and PDGFRα when stained by these antibodies. Better survival could be obtained if the metastatic tumor is removed in some patients with metastases. Four (4/31, 12.9%) patients died due to their tumors. Conclusions: WDFA is very different to conventional adenocarcinoma in clinicopathology. It prefers to occur in the second and third decades. Lymph node metastasis is infrequent. Beta-catenin may be a potential marker for disease. Surgery is the best therapy method if the technology is feasible.
Keywords: Lung cancer, well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma, pathologic diagnosis, treatment, prognosis
Introduction
In the Pulmonary and Mediastinal Pathology Department of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma (WDFA) has been recognized and diagnosed as a form of pulmonary blastoma (PB) since 1971. The classification by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1999 removed WDFA from the PB category and classified it as a variant of adenocarcinoma. In 2004, the WHO classified WDFA as high-grade fetal adenocarcinoma (HGFA) and low-grade fetal adenocarcinoma (LGFA). These two kinds of tumors are microscopically similar, but with differences; that is, HGFA tumor cells show more prominent nuclear atypia, a lack of morule formation, a transition of conventional adenocarcinoma, and more necrosis [1].
WDFA, which was first described by Kradin [2] and Kodama [3], is a rare epithelial pulmonary malignancy, and its incidence rate has been reported to be at 0.5% in all cases of pulmonary adenocarcinoma [4,5]. Few cases have been reported and very little research has been conducted on the molecular mechanism, treatment and prognosis of WDFA. Hence, a review of outstanding cases can help better understand WDFA. Therefore, cases reported by Chinese authors from 1987 to July 2015 were summarized and reviewed, including one case previously reported by the authors of the present study [6]. In this manner, we were able to accrue the present data on WDFA to better understand, diagnose and treat this disease.
Materials and methods
Retrieval condition
WANFANG MED ONLINE and CNKI were searched using keywords “fetal adenocarcinoma” and “epithelial pulmonary blastoma (EPB)”, and 235 and 394 related articles retrieved, respectively. For NCBI PUBMED, the keyword “Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma” was used for the search, and 180 related articles were retrieved. Life span: unlimited to July 2015. Retrieval mode: machine retrieval. Retrieval time: July 27, 2015. A total of 64 cases were reported by Chinese authors with WDFA and EPB. Among these cases, the clinicopathological characteristics of 45 cases were collected for the present study.
Case selection criteria
Fetal adenocarcinoma (FA) consists of complex glandular structures that comprise of glycogen-rich, non-ciliated cells resembling a developing epithelium in the pseudoglandular phase of the fetal lung. Low-grade (well-differentiated) FAs have been described with low nuclear atypia and morule formation. The neoplastic glands are typically enveloped by a loose fibromyxoid stroma [7].
Case inclusion criteria: cases with a pathological diagnosis for WDFA and epithelial type pulmonary blastoma in literature, and the performance of the tumor tissue under a microscope conform to the pathological diagnosis of WHO standards. All cases selected for this study were evaluated by one pathologist (Yiran Cai, Ph. D) and two oncologists (Tongmei Zhang, Assistant Chief Physician, and Baohua Lu, Attending Doctor).
TNM stage criteria
Referring to the 2009 International Union Against Cancer (UICC, Seventh Edition) TNM Staging of Lung Cancer, cases before 2009 were re-staged according to the new stage edition.
When multiple tumors were present in one patient, the tumor’s maximum diameter was calculated based on the largest tumor.
Follow-up time was calculated according to the reported literature, which varied between patients.
Statistical methods
All statistical analyses were executed using SPSS 18.0 software. The level of significance was defined as P<0.05. Fisher’s exact test was performed to explore associations between survival and factors including age, gender, asymptomatic, smoke, tumor size, lymph nodes metastases and pathologic stage.
Results
There were 24 WDFA and 21 EPB cases reported by Chinese authors (Table 1) [6,9-39]. These Chinese cases were also compared with cases reported in Japan (Sato [8]) and USA (Koss [4]) (Table 2).
Table 1.
Clinical data summary of 45 cases in Chinese
| Num. | Age | Gender | Symptom | Smoke | Pathological Type | Max-diameter (cm) | Location | pTNM | Follow up (months) | Author |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | F | Chest pain, distress | ND | WDFA | 4 | L.U.L | pT2aN0M0 | ND | Han JA [9] |
| 2 | 6 | M | Cough, sputum | ND | WDFA | 5 | L.U.L | pT2aN0M0 | 17/alive | Kou YL [10] |
| 3 | 48 | F | Hemoptysis, chest distress | ND | WDFA | 6 | R.L.L | pT2bN0M0 | ND | Guo AT [11] |
| 4 | 29 | F | Cough, suptum | ND | WDFA | 1.2 | R.M.L | pT1aN0M0 | 2/alive | Tan MH [12] |
| 5 | 26 | M | Asymptomatic | Yes | WDFA | 7 | R.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | 86/alive | Zhang TM [6] |
| 6 | 48 | M | Chest pain, night sweat, fatigue | Yes | WDFA | 3 | L.U.L | pT2aN0M0 | 22/alive | Shi HQ [13] |
| 7 | 27 | F | Cough, blood-streak sputum | ND | WDFA | 2.5 | R.U.L | ND | ND | Fang GY [14] |
| 8 | 23 | M | Cough, blood-streak sputum | ND | WDFA | 6.7 | L.U.L | pT2bN2M0 | 14/alive | Fan JQ [15] |
| 9 | 25 | F | Cough, suptum | No | WDFA | 9 | R.M.L | pT3N0M0 | 1/alive | Zhang Y [16] |
| 10 | ND | F | Cough, suptum | ND | WDFA | 3 | R.U.L | pT1bN0M0 | ND | Wang HY [17] |
| 11 | 25 | M | Chest pain, blood-streak sputum | No | WDFA | 5.6 | L.L.L | pT2bN0M0 | 36/alive | Luo CQ [18] |
| 12 | 51 | F | Cough, hemoptysis | ND | WDFA | 3.6 | L.U.L | pT2aN0M0 | 36/alive | Luo CQ [18] |
| 13 | 58 | F | Asymptomatic | No | WDFA | 5.5 | R.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | ND | Li JZ [19] |
| 14 | 41 | M | Cough, suptum, chest pain | Yes | WDFA | 4 | L.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | 32/alive | Wang YF [20] |
| 15 | 36 | F | Asymptomatic | No | WDFA | 3 | L.L.L | pT1bN0M0 | 56/alive | Wang YF [20] |
| 16 | 30 | F | Cough, chest distress | Yes | WDFA | 2.5 | R.U.L | pT3N0M0 | 49/alive | Wang YF [20] |
| 17 | 31 | F | ND | No | EBP | 12 | L.U.L | pT3N0M0 | 131/alive | Liu ZF [21] |
| 18 | 38 | M | ND | Yes | WDFA | ND | Mul (right) | IIIb | 72/alive | Liu ZF [21] |
| 19 | 48 | F | ND | No | EBP | 6 | R.L.L | pT2bN0M0 | 115/alive | Liu ZF [21] |
| 20 | 72 | M | ND | Yes | WDFA | 5 | R.L.L | pT2bN0M0 | 38/alive | Liu ZF [21] |
| 21 | 59 | M | Cough, bloody sputum, chest pain | Yes | WDFA | 5 | L.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | 101/death of CF | Xu T [22] |
| 22 | 36 | M | Cough, bloody sputum | Yes | EBP | 6 | L.U.L | ND | 18/death of PD | Liu AJ [23] |
| 23 | 27 | F | Dry cough, chest pain | ND | WDFA | 7.5 | R.M.L.L | pT3N0M0 | 45/alive | Liu SH [24] |
| 24 | 50 | M | Cough, bloody sputum | Yes | EBP | 10 | L.U.L | pT3N0M0 | 36/death | Li QM [25] |
| 25 | 38 | M | Cough, bloody sputum, chest pain | Yes | EBP | 7 | L.U.L | pT3N0M0 | ND | Qian B [26] |
| 26 | 12 | M | Hemoptysis, chest distress, weak | ND | EBP | 6.5 | R.L.L | ND | ND | Yin MX [27] |
| 27 | 41 | M | Dry cough, hemoptysis | ND | EBP | 5 | M.B (R) | ND | ND | Gao J [28] |
| 28 | 34 | F | Fever, cough | ND | EBP | 2.0/1.5/0.8 | Mul (left) | ND | ND | Gao J [28] |
| 29 | 54 | F | Asymptomatic | ND | EBP | 0.6-2.1 | Bilateral lung | pT4N0M1a | ND | Geng J [29] |
| 30 | 33 | M | Asymptomatic | ND | EBP | 7 | L.L.L | ND | ND | Zhang CL [30] |
| 31 | 20 | M | Asymptomatic | ND | EBP | 5 | R.L.L | ND | ND | Qin NS [31] |
| 32 | 18 | M | Asymptomatic | ND | EBP | 6 | R.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | 72/alive | Fan L [32] |
| 33 | 30 | F | Cough, chest pain, Dyspnea | No | EBP | 5 | R.U.L | PT3N3M0 | 9/death | Han LZ [33] |
| 34 | 36 | M | Cough, bloody sputum | ND | EBP | 3.6/6 | Mul (left) | ND | ND | Wei F [34] |
| 35 | ND | M | Cough | Yes | EPB | ND | R.U.L | PTxN0M0 | 24/alive | Huo Z [35] |
| 36 | 12 | F | Asymptomatic | No | EPB | 10 | R.M.L | pT3N0M0 | 5/death | Zhang GQ [36] |
| 37 | 38 | M | Asymptomatic | No | EPB | 6.9 | R.L.L | pT2bN0M0 | 32/relaps | Zhang GQ [36] |
| 38 | 33 | F | Asymptomatic | No | EPB | 10.2 | R.U.L | pT3N0M0 | 20/alive | Zhang GQ [36] |
| 39 | 33 | F | Asymptomatic | No | EPB | 7 | R.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | 15/alive | Zhang GQ [36] |
| 40 | 55 | F | Cough, bloody sputum | Yes | WDFA | 6 | R.U.L | pT2bN0M0 | ND | Li SH [37] |
| 41 | ND | M | Cough, bloody sputum, chest pain | ND | WDFA | 10 | L.U.L | ND | 12/alive | Yin Z [38] |
| 42 | ND | M | Cough, bloody sputum, chest pain | ND | WDFA | 4 | L.U.L | ND | 12/alive | Yin Z [38] |
| 43 | ND | M | Cough, bloody sputum, chest pain | ND | WDFA | 11 | R.U.L | ND | 12/alive | Yin Z [38] |
| 44 | ND | F | Cough, bloody sputum, chest pain | ND | WDFA | 2.5 | R.L.L | ND | 12/alive | Yin Z [38] |
| 45 | 23 | F | Dry cough | ND | WDFA | 4 | R.U.L | ND | 7/alive | Li XZ [39] |
M: male; F: female; L.U.L: left upper lobe; R.L.L: right lower lobe; R.M.L: right middle lobe; R.U.L: right upper lobe; R.U.M.L: right upper and middle lobe; R.M.L.L: right middle and lower lobe; M.B: mainstem bronchus; L: left; R: right; Mul: multiple; ND: no description. CF: cardiac failure. PD: primary disease.
Table 2.
Comparative clinical features of WDFA reported by Sato, Koss and this paper
| Parameter | Chinese | Japan (Sato) | USA (Koss) |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cases | 45 | 25 | 28 |
| Mean age/range (years) | 35/6-72 | 37/19-58 | 33/ND |
| Male/Female | 23/22 | 10/15 | 13/15 |
| Smoker (yes/no) | 12/10 | ND | 19/4 |
| Asymptomatic (%) | 11/41 (26.8) | ND (76) | ND (57) |
| Solitary (%) | 35/42 (83.3) | ND | ND (96) |
| Pleural effusion (yes/no) | 1/40 | ND | 0/23 |
| Metastasis at diagnosis/no metastasis | 1/45 | 1/25 | 5/21 |
| Tumor size (cm) mean/median/range | 6/6/0.6-12 | 4.5/3.5/1.4-12 | 4.5/3.75/1-10 |
| Location (right/left) | 26/18 | 15/10 | ND |
| Solitary/multiple | 36/4 | 26/0 | ND |
| Pathological stage | 31 | 24 | 24 |
| I | 7 | 22 | 20 |
| >I | 24 (77.4%) | 2 (8%) | 4 (20%) |
| Lymph node metastasis | 3 (0.9%) | 2 (8%) | 3 (14%) |
| N0/N1/N2 | 29/1/2 | 22/2/0 | ND |
| No. follow-up | 30 | 22 | 21 |
| Median/mean follow up (months) | 24/37.6 | 39/ND | 95/97 |
| No. died of tumor (%) | 4 (13.3%) | 2 (8.3%) | 3 (14%) |
ND: no description.
Epidemiology
Among the 45 patients in this review, 23 (23/45, 51.1%) patients were male and 22 (22/45, 48.9%) patients were female. The mean age at diagnosis for all patients was 34.69 ± 14.71 years old (range, 6-72 years old) with a bimodal peak in the second and third decades. The age distribution is presented in Figure 1. Furthermore, 12 patients (12/22, 54.5%) were smokers and 10 (10/22, 45.5%) patients were nonsmokers (Table 2).
Figure 1.

The number of cases in different decades, with a bimodal peak in the second and third decades, are mainly in 20-39 ages, cases that younger than 10 ages or older than 60 ages are very rare.
Clinical characteristics
The main symptoms at the time of diagnosis were coughing, sputum, blood-streak sputum or hemoptysis, chest distress, chest pain and other respiratory symptoms. In 30 patients (30/41, 73.2%), only three patients (3/41, 7.3%) had systemic symptoms at the same time, such as fever, fatigue and night sweat. Eleven patients (11/41, 26.8%) were asymptomatic, and lesions were only occasionally found upon physical examination. The X-ray characteristics of WDFA are detailed in Table 3. All patients underwent operations that allowed for a definite diagnosis. Minimally invasive biopsy specimens such as those obtained through computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy and tracheostomy with bronchoscopic biopsy failed to confirm the diagnosis before surgery, and only six cases were diagnosed as malignant before surgery.
Table 3.
The X-ray characteristics in WDFA cases
| X-ray characteristics | Cases (%) |
|---|---|
| Tumor location | |
| Left lung | 18/45 (40.0) |
| Right lung | 26/45 (57.8) |
| Bilateral lung | 1/45 (2.2) |
| Upper lobe | 26/45 (57.8) |
| Lower lobe | 11/45 (24.4) |
| Central | 13/43 (30.2) |
| Peripheral | 30/43 (69.8) |
| Tumor number | |
| Single lesion | 40/45 (88.9) |
| Double/multiple | 5/45 (11.1) |
| Tumor shape | |
| Single Solitary mass/nodules | 34/42 (81.0) |
| Mass with liquefaction | 1/42 (2.4) |
| Multiple nodules | 5/42 (11.9) |
| Lobe consolidation | 1/42 (2.4) |
| Patch shadow | 1/42 (2.4) |
| Tumor size | |
| <5 cm | 13/43 (30.2) |
| ≥5 cm | 30/43 (69.8) |
The progression in 31 patients was quantified by the authors via the TNM stage. Among these patients, 7, 20, 1, 2 and 1 patients were at stage I, II, IIIa, IIIb and IV, respectively. Merely three patients had N1 and/or N2 lymph nodes (Table 1).
Pathological characteristics and gene mutation
Gross pathological characteristics were described in only a few of the cases. The color of the tumors was typically variegated, with mixtures of white, tan, or gray. Four (4/45, 8.9%) lesions had foci of little necrosis, which was often central in location. Through a microscope, the tumor appeared to have well-ordered neoplastic glands, and moruls could often been observed. Some tumors displayed a scanty, mature spindle cell mesenchyme. The glands consisted of branching tubules lined by stratified columnar cells with a clear cytoplasm and relatively little nuclear hyperchromasia or pleomorphism (Figure 2). A total of 34 tumors were reported by the authors in the present study based on immunochemistry staining results, but the immunohistochemical antibodies were greatly differed among the 31 patients (Table 4).
Figure 2.

Pathological changes from microscope, cancer cells are made of tubular or adenoid structure. The tumor have well-ordered neoplastic glands and moruls. The glands consisted of branching tubules lined by stratified columnar cells with a clear cytoplasm and relatively little nuclear hyperchromasia or pleomorphism.
Table 4.
Immunochemical staining of WDFA in 45 cases
| Antibody | Positive (No. cases positive/No. stained) | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Keratin, CK, AE1/AE3 | 8/8, 20/22, 4/4 | 100.0/90.9/100.0 |
| CEA | 4/10 | 40.0 |
| Vimentin | 2/6 | 33.3 |
| Actin | 0/3 | 0 |
| S-100 | 3/11 | 27.3 |
| NSE | 6/9 | 66.7 |
| AFP | 2/8 | 25.0 |
| CgA | 17/26 | 65.4 |
| Syn | 11/15 | 73.3 |
| PAS | 5/10 | 50.0 |
| β-catenin | 10/10 | 100.0 |
| EMA | 4/5 | 80.0 |
| P53 | 4/7 | 57.1 |
| PDGFRα | 2/2 | 100.0 |
| EGFR | 1/3 | 33.3 |
| AAT | 3/5 | 60.0 |
| Her2 | 0/2 | 0 |
| ER | 0/8 | 0 |
| PR | 0/8 | 0 |
| TTF-1 | 11/13 | 84.6 |
| CD56 | 3/9 | 33.3 |
| NapsinA | 4/4 | 100.0 |
| Ki-67 | 2/2 | 100.0 |
| CK7 | 7/8 | 87.5 |
| CK20 | 0/2 | 0 |
| CDX-2 | 0/5 | 0 |
| CA125 | 0/1 | 0 |
| CD117 | 1/1 | 100.0 |
CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; NSE: nero-specific enolase; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; CgA: chromogranin A; Syn: synaptophysin; PAS: periodic acid Schiff; EMA: epithelial membrane antigen; PDGFR: platelet-derived growth factor receptor; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; AAT: α1 antitrypsin; Her2: human epidermal growth factor receptor; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; TTF-1: thyroid transcription factor-1; CD: neural cell adhesion molecules; CK: cytokeratins; CA125: cancer antigen 125.
The mutation status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS genes were tested in only six patients, none of these patients revealed a mutation. The echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EMAL4-ALK) gene was investigated in three patients, and no mutations detected; while the P53 gene was assayed in one patient, and no mutations were observed.
Treatment and prognosis
All patients underwent surgery to remove these tumors, while 10 (10/45, 22.2%) patients also received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens presented in these studies had 2-3 drug combinations, and were usually platinum-based regimens. Terminal cases and cases that received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were also reviewed in other studies with available clinical data (Tables 5 and 6) [4,8,15,21-25,33,35,36,40-46].
Table 5.
The data of patients received radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy in this paper and literatures
| Author | Age | Sex | Smoke | Size (cm) | Stage pTNM | Surgery | CT Regimen | RT | Therapy Effect | Recurrent sites | Follow-up (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fan JQ [15] | 23 | M | ND | 6.0 | IIIa (T2bN2M0) | Lobe | DP* | No | SD | Brain M | 14/alive |
| Liu ZF [21] | 31 | F | No | 12.0 | IIb | ND | NP# | No | SD | No | 131/alive |
| 48 | F | No | 6.0 | IIa | ND | NI# | No | SD | No | 115/alvie | |
| 72 | M | Yes | 5.0 | IIb | ND | IPV# | No | SD | No | 38/alive | |
| Liu SH [24] | 27 | F | ND | 7.5 | ND | ND | TP# | No | SD | No | 45/alive |
| Huo Z [35] | ND | M | Yes | ND | ND | Lobe | ND | Yes | SD | No | 24/alive |
| Zhang GQ [36] | 12 | F | No | 10.0 | IIb (T3N0M0) | ND | CVK# | Yes | SD | Multiple M | 5/death |
| 38 | M | No | 6.9 | IIa (T2bN0M0) | ND | IVE# | No | SD | No | 32/relaps | |
| 33 | F | No | 10.2 | IIb (T3N0M0 | ND | NP# | No | SD | No | 20/alive | |
| 33 | F | No | 7.0 | IIa (T2bN0M0 | ND | NP# | No | SD | No | 15/alive | |
| Lkhoyaali S [40] | 29 | M | Yes | 12.5 | IIb (T3N0M0) | Lobe | EP* | No | SD | No | 24/alive |
| Zaidi A [41] | 27 | F | Yes | 9.0 | IIIb (T4N0M0) | Lobe | MIP* | No | SD | No | 29/alive |
| 44 | M | Yes | 9.0 | IIIb (T4N0M0) | Pneu | No | Yes | SD | Brain M | 55/alive | |
| Kyung C [42] | 48 | M | Yes | 7.7 | ND | No | D | Yes | PR | No | 7/alive |
| Van Loo [43] | 44 | M | ND | 9.0 | IIIa (T4N0M0) | Pneu | No | Yes | ND | No | 55/alive |
| 27 | F | ND | 9.0 | IIIa (T4N0M0) | pneu | MIP | No | ND | No | 29/alive | |
| Junping W [44] | 39 | M | ND | 1.0 | IIb (T3N0M0) | Pneu | TC# | No | ND | No | 30/alive |
| Patnayak R [45] | 50 | M | Yes | 10.0 | IIb (T3N0M0) | Lobe | TC# | No | SD | No | 18/alive |
| Chao SC [46] | 56 | M | Yes | ND | IV | No | GEM | Yes | ND | Cutaneuos, brain | 12/death |
CT: chemotherapy; M: male; F: female; pneu: pneumonectomy; lobe: lobectomy; RT: radiotherapy; M: metastases; ND: no description;
adjuvant chemotherapy;
neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
SD: stable disease; PR: partial response; DP: docetaxel-cisplatin; NP: navelbine-cisplatin; NI: navelbine-ifosfamide; IPV: ifosfamide-cisplatin-etoposide; TP: paclitaxel-cisplatin; CVK: cyclophosphamide-vincristine-actinomycin; IVE: ifosfamide-vincristine-etoposide; EP: etoposide-cisplatin; ND: no description; D: docetaxel; MIP: mitomycin-C-ifosfamide-cisplatin; TC: paclitaxel-carboplatin; GEM: gemcitabine.
Table 6.
The clinical characteristics of dead WDFA patients in this paper and literature
| Author | Age | Gender | Smoke | Size (cm) | pTNM | Therapy | Recurrent Sites | Survival Time (months) | Death Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xu T [22] | 59 | M | Yes | 5.0 | pT2bN0M0 | Surgery | ND | 101 | CF |
| Liu AJ [23] | 36 | M | Yes | 6.0 | pT3N0M0 | Surgery | ND | 18 | PD |
| Li QM [25] | 50 | M | Yes | 10.0 | pT3N0M0 | Surgery | ND | 36 | PD |
| Han LZ [33] | 72 | M | Yes | 5.0 | pT3N3M0 | Surgery | ND | 9 | PD |
| Zhang GQ [36] | 12 | F | No | 10.0 | pT3N0M0 | S+C | Multiple | 5 | PD |
| Koss MN [4] | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | Surgery | Brain | 2 | PD |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | S+C | Lung | 34 | PD | |
| ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | S+C | Lymph nodes | 34 | PD | |
| Sato S [8] | 52 | M | ND | 6.0 | pT1N0M0 | Surgery | Yes | 28 | PD |
| Caho SC [46] | 55 | F | ND | 5.0 | pT2N1M1 | ND | ND | 24 | PD |
| 56 | M | Yes | ND | IV | C | Brain, cutaneous | 12 | PD |
F: female; M: male; ND: no description; CF: cardiac failure; PD: primary disease; S+C: surgery and chemotherapy; C: chemotherapy.
In the present study, 31 cases were followed-up for 1-131 months, with a mean follow-up duration of 37.6 months. Among these 31 patients, five patients died within the follow-up period, one patient died of cardiac failure 101 months following surgery to remove the tumor, and four (4/31, 12.9%) of the 31 patients died due to their tumors, with a mean survival time of 17 months (range, 5-36 months) in terminally ill patients. One patient had tumor recurrence after initial surgery, and was treated with three chemotherapeutic drugs. This patient was still alive after a follow-up at 32 months later (case 37). The remaining cases all survived without tumor recurrence during the follow-up.
The clinical, radiologic and pathologic indicators were also reviewed to determine whether these were correlated to the prognosis. A correlation could not be found in terms of age, gender, asymptomatic, smoker, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage.
Discussion
Before 1999, FA was diagnosed as EPB, a subtype of pulmonary blastoma. In 1998, Nakatani Y [1] first distinguished HGFA from WDFA through the presence of disorganized glands, prominent nucleoli, pronounced anisonucleosis, the absence of morules, extensive necrosis and transition to conventional adenocarcinoma. In 1999, the WHO classified WDFA as a variant of invasive adenocarcinoma, according to its predominant component, malignant glandular structures. With the increasing number of cases reviewed, WDFA has been found to differ from conventional adenocarcinoma and HGFA in clinicopathology and biology [47,48]. Hence, collecting cases reported in literature is very significant to better study this disease. This is the first study that conducted a review of Chinese WDFA patients and included the largest number of patients with the most detailed data. However, regrettably, we could not further study these specimens in terms of its molecular and genetic characteristics, because these cases were collected from literatures, which belong to various hospitals.
In the 45 cases included in existing Chinese literatures, no gender predominance was observed, although some groups [43,49] reported a male or female predominance of WDFA. Although the mean age at diagnosis was the same with the other reported cases, the bimodal age peak was at the second and third decades in Chinese patients, which was different to the cases reported by Koss [4] and Larsen [49]. No smoking tendency is observed, because only 22 patients had a history of smoking in the present study.
The common symptoms were not specific, and it was difficult to distinguish WDFA from other respiratory diseases with just their symptoms. Furthermore, only 11 patients (26.8%) were asymptomatic. This was lower than that reported by Koss [4], and it may be because 77.4% of tumors were higher than stage I and 69.8% of tumors had a maximum diameter >5 cm in the present study.
These tumors were preferentially located in the right lung, upper lobe and peripheral field in X-ray. Most of the tumors were a single, solitary mass in CT scans. Few patients revealed multiple nodules, lobe-consolidation, pleural effusion and patchy shadows. Furthermore, there were few incidences of lymph node metastases in WDFA patients the present study, as well as in other reviews [4,8,45].
In the present study, a N2 patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the tumor did not respond; but lymph node metastasis was significantly reduced. Then, the patient underwent resection of the cerebral metastatic tumor at nine months after the initial surgery, and was still alive without tumor recurrence at five months after cerebral tumor resection (case 8). Another 12-year-old girl at stage II, who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, was found with wide metastasis and died due to its progression at five months after initial surgery (case 36). Lkhoyaali [40] reported a case that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and revealed a 12% reduction in tumor mass. Zaidi [41] reported a case, wherein the treatment of neoadjuvant CMT with mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin for a stage T4 N0 M0 patient successfully downstaged the tumor before surgical resection. In addition, Kyung [42] reported a patient with a locally advanced stage, who was treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, and achieved partial tumor response. In the reviewed literature, 19 patients received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; and 10 of these patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (Table 5). To date, there is no evidence for the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in WDFA patients, and there also no standard or recommended chemotherapy regimen. Surgery is preferred when technically possible, since surgery increases the survival of patients, even for patients with recurrence [4,15,36].
Koss [4] reported 28 WDFA cases, in which only six (29%) patients had recurrent tumors. Among these patients, three patients were treated surgically, and were tumor free after a follow-up duration of 33, 101 and 153 months. Furthermore, only three (14%) of the 21 patients died due to their disease, and two of them received postoperative chemotherapy.
Larsen [49] reported 23 WDFA cases, in which 57% were male and 43% were female. These tumors from these cases were stained with 38 different antibodies and more than 90% positive reactions were demonstrated with NSE and CEA. Furthermore, only two WDFA patients received chemotherapy, while no objective response was observed. In the present study, the positive reactions of NSE and CEA were only 66.7% and 40%, respectively; which were lower than that reported by Larsen.
Although some studies [50-54] reported that using aspiration cytomorphology or a bronchial brush would allow for a diagnosis before the operation, none of the diagnosis of patients in this study were confirmed before the operation; and it is difficult to determine a diagnosis based on a small biopsy, such as that reported by Van Loo [43]. With the research of more molecular biomarkers and the elevated awareness of WDFA, cytodiagnosis would be an easy and popular approach for this.
The mutation of EGFR, KRAS and ALK genes was not found in the present study. Some studies [19,54,55] reported the aberrant nuclear localization and gene mutation of β-catenin in WDFA, and noted that the upregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway may be a common denominator for the development of tumors. This review also revealed that these tumors had a 100% positive reaction to β-catenin, PDGFRα, and NapsinA staining after staining with the antibodies. Beta-catenin is a potential diagnostic marker for WDFA [19,52,53]. However, further research on its molecular mechanism is needed, such as the β-catenin, PDGFRα, NapsinA and Wnt signaling pathway.
Sato [8] reported a case of WDFA, and reviewed 25 cases reported in Japan. There were two cases with N1 lymph node metastasis of resection, and one of these cases had a distant metastasis to an eye at the time of diagnosis. There were no N2-postive cases, and almost all of these cases were N0 (22 cases, 88%). The follow-up period was 36 months (range, 5-120 months), and two (8%) of these patients died due to their tumors. Mortality was lower than that in this study (12.9%) and that reported by Koss [4] (14%).
Difurio [56] reviewed eight pediatric patients with WDFA. However, only four patients had detailed data and the maximum diameter of the tumor was 1.5-5.5 cm. Three tumors presented in the upper lobe, while one tumor presented in the lingual lobe. Furthermore, only three patients were followed for 39, 28 and 24 months, respectively. This review included five pediatric patients, in which two patients were younger than 10 years old. One 12-year-old girl died of the tumor even though she received surgery and chemotherapy. To our knowledge, there were very few WDFA cases younger than 10 years old and cases older than 60 years old.
The mortality due to WDFA in the literature is presented in Table 6. Except for one case where a patient died of cardiac failure, the 10 cases reported died due to tumor progression. The mean age was 47.6 years old (range, 12-72 years old), and the mean survival time was 20.2 months (range, 2-36 months). The TNM stage was noted for each patient who died. We could not observe the correlation between survival and the clinicopathological indexes in this study. This may be attributed to fewer terminal patients during the follow-up periods and the great variations in the follow-up time for each patient (1-131 months).
WDFA is an infrequent and slowly developing tumor, and its 5-years survival rate is more than 80% [4]. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy is seldom effective, and complete surgical resection is essential for long-term survival. WDFA has favorable prognosis in existing data, but the outcome remains worse in some cases (case 8, 13, 22, 24, 33, 36 and 37). Due to the small specimen used to diagnose WDFA, and the frequency of heterogeneity in tumors, it is possible to diagnose HGFA as WDFA. This is because HGFA is similar to WDFA in pathological changes, and has a worse prognosis. Pathologists play an increasingly important role in personalized medicine for patients with lung cancer, including WDFA; and a correct pathological diagnosis is very important to provide an effective therapy. There is still a need to gather more information and detailed cases to further determine the pathological and molecular mechanism of WFDA.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z17110000101703; to Tongmei Zhang). Thanks Dane D Jensen Ph. D (pharmocology department, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno) for helping with the revision of the content.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Nakatani Y, Kitamura H, Inayama Y, Kamijo S, Nagashima Y, Shimoyama K, Nakamura N, Sano J, Ogawa N, Shibagaki T, Resl M, Mark EJ. Pulmonary adenocarcinomas of the fetal lung type: a clinicopathologic study indicating differences in histology, epidemiology, and natural history of low-grade and high-grade forms. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:399–411. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199804000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kradin RL, Young RH, Dickersin GR, Kirkham SE, Mark EJ. Pulmonary blastoma with argyrophil cells and lacking sarcomatous features (pulmonary endodermal tumor resembling fetal lung) Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:165–172. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198203000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kodama T, Shimosato Y, Watanabe S, Koide T, Naruke T, Shimase J. Six cases of well differentiated adenocarcinoma simulating fetal lung tubules in pseudoglandular stage: comparison with pulmonary blastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8:735–744. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198410000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koss MN, Hochholzer L, O’Leary T. Pulmonary blastomas. Cancer. 1991;67:2368–2381. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910501)67:9<2368::aid-cncr2820670926>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tamai S, Kameya T, Shimosato Y, Tsumuraya M, Wada T. Pulmonary blastoma: an ultrastructural study of a case and its transplanted tumor in nude mice. Cancer. 1980;46:1389–1396. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800915)46:6<1389::aid-cncr2820460617>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang T, Qin N, Li B. Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of lung: a case report with 14 cases literature review. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2010;13:838–840. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2010.08.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burke AP, Marx A, Nicholson AG. In: WHO classification of tumor of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. 4th edition. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, editors. pp. 41–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sato S, Koike T, Yamato Y, Yoshiya K, Honma K, Tsukada H. Resected well-differentiated fetal pulmonary adenocarcinoma and summary of 25 cases reported in Japan. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:539–542. doi: 10.1007/s11748-006-0048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Han AJ, Xiong M, Wang LT. A case of well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of lung. Chin J Pathol. 2000;29:471. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kou YL, Zhou Q, Jiang GL. A case of Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of lung. J Sichuan Univers (Med Sci Edi) 2003;34:604. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guo AT, Wei LX. Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma. Chin J Diagn Pathol. 2000;7:158. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tan MH, Lei WH. A case of well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma. Chin J Diagn Pathol. 2006;13 2 36. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shi HQ, Liu QW, Lou SX. Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung clinicopathologic analysis. J Practi Oncol. 2005;19:378–379. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fang GY, Ding YQ. Well-differentiated fetal pulmonary adenocarcinoma one case. Chin J Clinic Experi Pathol. 2002;18:448. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fan JQ, Tian F, Gong M, Gao Z. Well-differentiated fetal pulmonary adenocarcinoma one case. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;28:759. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y, Li H, Zhang WQ. Fetal pulmonary adenocarcinoma one case. Cancer Research and Clinic. 2013;25:70–71. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang HY, He M, Chen X, Liu GJ. Well-differentiated fetal pulmonary adenocarcinoma one case. Jiangsu Medical Journal. 2010;3:198. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Luo CQ, Sai-Ching JY, Liu ZG, Meng J, Zhong FT, Cheng C. Pulmonary well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma with platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)α expression. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012;13:1384–1389. doi: 10.4161/cbt.22253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li JZ, Bai XH, Zou YF, Hao YY, Xu XH. Aberration of the Wnt signaling pathway in pulmonary fatal adenocarcinoma: a case report. Chin J Cancer Res. 2014;26:E13–E16. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.02.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang YF, Liu B, Xu Y, Bo RS, Shi SS, Lu ZF, Zhou XJ. Fetal lung adenocarcinoma-low grade: a clinicathological study of 3 cases. J Diag Pathol. 2014;21:19–22. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu ZF, Li F, Jiao SC. Clinical analysis of adult type pulmonary blastoma. Chin J Modern Medicine. 2009;19:1208–1210. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu T, Gao YH, Chen P, Wen G, Du LH. Clinical analysis on 7 cases of pulmonary blastoma. Cancer Res Prev Treat. 2011;38:1214–1216. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu AJ, Li WH, Li JB, Xu HM, Chen LZ, Zhang J, Zeng MY. Pathological and differential diagnosis for nine cases of adult type pulmonary blastoma. J Diag Pathol. 1999;6:75–77. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu SH, Gao J. Clinicopathological study of fetal lung adenocarcinoma. Chin Prac Med. 2014;9:197–198. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li QM, Liu JW, Zhan ZL. Pulmonary blastoma in 2 cases. Chin J Clin Oncol. 2004;31:2414. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Qian B, Dai XW, Fang L. Adult epithelial pulmonary blastoma one case. J Diag Pathol. 2001;8:370. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yin MX, Tao ZY, Tang L. Epithelial pulmonary blastoma one case. Zhejiang Cancer Journal. 2000;6:51. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao J, OuYang JD, Huang PY. The characteristics and diagnosis of epithelial type pulmonary blastoma pathology. Modern Medical J. 2003;31:339–340. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geng J, Zhu MG. Adult epithelial pulmonary blastoma one case. Gangdong Medical J. 2004;25:1273. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang CL, Du X, Gao H. Adult type pulmonary blastoma 1 case report and literature review. J Shanxi Med Univ. 2011;42:578–580. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Qin NS. Pulmonary blastoma: case report. Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2004;20:809. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fan L, Si XM. Pulmonary blastoma two cases. Chin Lung Cancer J. 2001;4:232. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Han LZ, Huang Y, Chen YZ, Fu H, Xue YH. Pulmonary blastoma: a clinicopathological analysis. J Diag Pathol. 2006;13:180–183. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Feng W. A case of epithelial pulmonary blastoma. Public Medical Forum Magazine. 2004;8:660. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huo Z, Liu HR. Clinicopathology and immunohischemistry of adult type pulmonary blastoma. Acta Acad Med Sin. 2005;27:475–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang GQ, Fang XZ, Wang BQ, Sun W, Salai AD. Clinicopathologycal and immunohistochemical features of pulmonary blastoma: analysis of 4 cases and review of the literature. Natl Med J China. 2007;87:1040–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li SH, Zhang JX. A case of well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung. Funct Mol Med Imaging (Electronic Edition) 2014;3:544–545. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yin Z, Qi J, Zhang Q. Well-differentiated fetal lung adenocarcinoma on diagnosis and treatment (report of 4 cases) J Chin Physic. 2015;17:116–117. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li XZ, Liu YN, Le MZ, Zhang TQ, Wang CS, Yang HC. Histopathological study of pulmonary adenocarcinoma of fetal lung type. J Diag Pathol. 1999;6:148–150. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lkhoyaali S, Boutayeb S, Ismaili N, Aitelhaj M, Ouchen F, Benosman A, Errihani H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:283. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zaidi A, Zamvar V, Macbeth F, Gibbs AR, Kulatilake N, Butchart EG. Pulmonary blastoma: medium-term results from a regional center. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1572–1575. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03494-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kyung C, Kim SY, Lim BJ, Cha JJ, Kim HJ, Ahn CM, Park H, Cho EN, Chang YS. A case of locally advanced well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2013;74:226–230. doi: 10.4046/trd.2013.74.5.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Van Loo S, Boeykens E, Stappaerts I, Rutsaert R. Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang J, Sun H, Bai R, Liu H, Yu T. Pulmonary blastoma with endobronchial growth. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:543–544. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31819c8646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Patnayak R, Jena A, Rukmangadha N, Lakshmi AY, Chandra A. Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung in an adult male: report of an unusual tumor with a brief review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10:419–21. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.136677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chao SC, Lee JY. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma presenting with cutaneous metastases. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:778–780. doi: 10.1111/j.0007-0963.2004.05877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Suzuki M, Yazawa T, Ota S, Morimoto J, Yoshino I, Yamanaka S, Inayama Y, Kawabata Y, Shimizu Y, Komatsu M, Notohara K, Koda K, Nakatani Y. High-grade fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung is a tumour with a fetal phenotype that shows diverse differentiation, including high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and mutational study of 20 cases. Histopathology. 2015;67:806–816. doi: 10.1111/his.12711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morita S, Yoshida A, Goto A, Ota S, Tsuta K, Yokozawa K, Asamura H, Nakajima J, Takai D, Mori M, Oka T, Tamaru J, Itoyama S, Furuta K, Fukayama M, Tsuda H. High-grade lung adenocarcinoma with fetal lung-like morphology: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses of 17 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:924–932. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827e1e83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Larsen H, Sorensen JB. Pulmonary blastoma: a review with special emphasis on prognosis and treatment. Cancer Treat Rev. 1996;22:145–160. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90000-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Geisinger KR, Travis WD, Perkins LA, Zakowski MF. Aspiration cytomorphology of fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:894–902. doi: 10.1309/AJCP4T5SWATQLKTQ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kneafsey P, Duggan MA, McFadden S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of pulmonary, welldifferentiated fetal adenocarcinoma prepared by the ThinPrep method. Cytopathology. 2003;14:87–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.00031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee GL, Cho NH. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of pulmonary fetal adenocarcinoma of fetal type: report of a case with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991;7:409–414. doi: 10.1002/dc.2840070414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Proctor L, Folpe AL, Esper A, Wolfenden LL, Force S, Logani S. Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung: cytomorphologic features on fine-needle aspiration with emphasis on use of beta-catenin as a useful diagnostic marker. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:39–42. doi: 10.1002/dc.20583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Odashiro DN. Pulmonary well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by bronchial brush and immunocytochemistry. Diag Cytopath. 2006;34:308–310. doi: 10.1002/dc.20409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nakatani Y, Masudo K, Miyagi Y, Inayama Y, Kawano N, Tanaka Y, Kato K, Ito T, Kitamura H, Nagashima Y, Yamanaka S, Nakamura N, Sano J, Ogawa N, Ishiwa N, Notohara K, Resl M, Mark EJ. Aberrant nuclear localization and gene mutation of β-catenin in WDFA, and up regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway may be a common denominator for the development of tumors that form morules. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:617–624. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Difurio MJ, Auerbach A, Kaplan K. Well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma: rare tumor in the pediatric population. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6:564–567. doi: 10.1007/s10024-003-4046-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
