Abstract
The role of zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A (ZBTB7A) in oncogenesis has been shown to be context-dependent, participating in pro-oncogenic or oncosuppressive mechanisms by directly regulating gene transcription or by interacting with other regulatory proteins. Alterations in ZBTB7A expression have been associated with worse prognosis. We examined ZBTB7A protein expression in breast carcinoma tissue samples and analyzed its clinical and prognostic significance. Tissue microarray blocks from 196 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were immunostained and <65% positively stained tumor cell nuclei were defined as low ZBTB7A expression. Of 196 IDC cases, 120 (61.2%) showed low ZBTB7A expression. Low nuclear ZBTB7A expression was associated with larger tumor size, higher histological grade, estrogen receptor negativity, progesterone receptor negativity, triple negativity, and recurrence. Cytoplasmic ZBTB7A expression was not associated with any clinicopathological characteristics. In univariate survival analysis, nuclear ZBTB7A expression did not affect overall or recurrence-free survival. However, multivariate survival analysis revealed that ZBTB7A independently predicted recurrence-free survival of IDC patients. Reduced ZBTB7A expression is associated with aggressive oncogenic behavior of IDC. ZBTB7A expression may be a novel prognostic biomarker for predicting recurrence-free survival of IDC patients.
Keywords: Breast, invasive ductal carcinoma, zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A, immunohistochemistry, prognosis
Introduction
Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A (ZBTB7A; also known as factor that binds to inducer of short transcripts protein 1, Pokemon, leukemia/lymphoma-related factor, and osteoclast-derived zinc finger) is a member of the BTB/poxvirus and zinc finger, and Kruppel (POK) family of transcription factors. Through the zinc finger domain, POK proteins bind to a specific consensus sequence in the target gene promoter to regulate transcription. The BTB domain enables homodimer formation and interaction with co-repressor proteins such as BCL6, a silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors, and mSin3A which is a histone deacetylase that contributes to transcriptional repression by POK proteins [1,2]. For ZBTB7A, the list of BTB domain-interacting proteins includes BCL6, specificity protein 1, and androgen receptor [2]. Being a transcription factor and having a nuclear localization signal at the C-terminal, ZBTB7A is often detected predominantly in the nucleus [3-8].
ZBTB7A plays developmental roles as demonstrated in the differentiation of hemato-lymphoid cells, chondrocytes, adipocytes, and osteoclasts [1,2]. Moreover, ZBTB7A mRNA and protein A have been identified in both normal and cancerous tissues of multiple organs. Increased ZBTB7A expression has been recognized in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and carcinomas of the colon, stomach, lung, ovary, liver, prostate, and breast [4,5,7,9-12]. A negative prognostic effect of high ZBTB7A expression has been reported in carcinomas of the stomach, lung, ovary, liver, and breast carcinomas, suggesting a tumor-promoting function of ZBTB7A [7,10,11,13-15]. On the other hand, reduced ZBTB7A expression has been associated with worse prognosis in colorectal carcinoma, malignant melanoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and acute myeloid leukemia, implicating its tumor-suppressive role [12,16-18]. The mechanism of ZBTB7A’s action appears to be versatile depending on the cell type. For example, ZBTB7A is oncogenic by transcriptionally repressing the tumor suppressor alternative reading frame in lymphoma cells and by transcriptionally activating membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase in ovarian carcinoma cells [10,12]. The tumor-suppressive function of ZBTB7A occurs through transcriptional repression of glycolytic genes and melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) or through indirect inhibition of a SOX9-dependent oncogenic pathway [16-19]. Deletion and inactivating mutations [8,16,18], as well as suppression by microRNA [11,19,20], have been suggested to contribute to the reduced ZBTB7A expression.
Three previously published reports describe ZBTB7A expression in breast carcinoma [4,14,15]. In two of these reports, ZBTB7A protein was overexpressed in a subset of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) and associated with a worse prognosis [14,15]. We revisited the issue with our cohort of 196 IDC cases, giving a detailed examination on the immunohistochemical expression of ZBTB7A and analyzing its possible associations with clinicopathological characteristics and patient outcome.
Materials and methods
Patient specimens and tissue microarray construction
The breast cancer tissue microarray used in this study has been previously described [21]. Briefly, the surgically resected specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed, and embedded in paraffin using a standard protocol. All available hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were reviewed by two Board-certified pathologists specialized in breast pathology, and the two most representative tumor areas were carefully selected and marked on individual formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Two tumor tissue cores (2 mm in diameter) were then obtained from each specimen and manually arrayed in recipient paraffin blocks. The tissue microarray consisted of 196 IDC cases. Nine cases were recurrent tumors, which were excluded from the survival analysis. The recurrence and survival status was updated by electronic medical record review for each included patient as of September 1, 2016. The histological grade of IDC had been determined according to the modified Bloom-Richardson grading system. The stage was based on the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. The study (2016-06-036) was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (Seoul, Republic of Korea).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 3 μm-thick tissue microarray block sections. Briefly, the sections were dehydrated and deparaffinized in xylene and then rehydrated in a graded series of alcohol solutions. We used primary antibodies against ZBTB7A (1:200, polyclonal; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA), estrogen receptor (ER; 1:200, clone SP1; LabVision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA), progesterone receptor (PR; 1:200, clone PgR 636; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; 1:200, clone SP3, LabVision Corporation). Immunostaining was performed using a compact polymer method (Bond Intense Detection Kit; Leica Biosystems, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). The primary antibodies were detected with Dako EnVision+ Systems, HRP (DakoCytomation), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Dako EnVision+ Detection Systems, Peroxidase/DAB (DakoCytomation) was used for chromogenic visualization. The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin and coverslipped. The expression status of ER, PR, and HER2 was assessed using the same methods as those described previously [21]. ER and PR status was assessed using the Allred scoring method [22]. HER2 expression was evaluated using American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations [23]. In cases with equivocal HER2 staining (score 2), silver in situ hybridization was performed to determine HER2 gene status. For ZBTB7A expression, the nuclear and/or cytoplasmic staining was separately assessed. The nuclear reactivity was scored as the percentage of positive nuclei among the tumor cells. The histogram of nuclear percentage score was roughly bimodal with a trough at 65%. Therefore, nuclear expression was stratified into low and high with a 65% cutoff. Cytoplasmic staining was scored as 1 (absent or weak), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong) and further dichotomized as low (score 1-2) and high (score 3) expression. In IDC cores where ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and/or non-neoplastic ducts coexisted, nuclear and cytoplasmic scores for DCIS/non-neoplastic ducts were documented along with those for IDC.
Statistical analysis
The Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or linear-by-linear association test was performed to determine the correlation between ZBTB7A expression status and clinicopathological characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from the first tumor resection to disease-specific death. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the time between the first tumor resection and the first radiological detection of recurrence or metastasis. Days to last follow-up replaced OS and RFS for censored cases. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were used to examine the prognostic significance of ZBTB7A expression. Curves for OS and RFS were drawn according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were analyzed using the log-rank test for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed for parameters that achieved statistical significance in univariate survival analysis, using the Cox proportional hazards model (95% confidence interval) with a backward stepwise elimination method. Statistical analyses were performed using PASW Statistics for Windows (version 18.0; IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of <0.05.
Results
ZBTB7A expression and its association with clinicopathological characteristics
Representative photomicrographs of ZBTB7A immunostaining in normal breast tissue and IDC are shown in Figure 1. ZBTB7A immunoreactivity was observed in the ductal epithelium of normal breast tissue and the peri-tumoral non-neoplastic ducts. In normal breast tissue, most of the ductal epithelial cells showed moderate nuclear ZBTB7A immunoreactivity. The median value of the nuclear percentage score in normal breast tissue was 70%. The myoepithelial cells occasionally displayed nuclear ZBTB7A expression. In IDC tissues, nuclear staining ranged from null to near 100% in different tumors (median, 30%). Applying a cutoff of 65% for nuclear staining, 76 of 196 IDC cases (38.8%) were classified as having high nuclear ZBTB7A expression, and the remaining 120 cases (61.2%) were classified as having low nuclear ZBTB7A expression. Cytoplasmic ZBTB7A staining in IDCs was strong in 28.1% (55/196) and weak-to-moderate in 71.9% (141/196). There was an inverse relationship between the nuclear and cytoplasmic ZBTB7A expression in IDC (P=0.009). In cores where DCIS coexisted with IDC (58 cases), the ZBTB7A expression pattern of DCIS was mostly indistinguishable from that of IDC.
Figure 1.

Representative photomicrographs of zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A (ZBTB7A) immunostaining. A. Nuclear ZBTB7A expression in the ductal epithelium of normal breast tissue. B. High nuclear ZBTB7A expression in breast cancer tissue. C. Low nuclear ZBTB7A expression in breast cancer tissue.
The association between ZBTB7A expression and clinicopathological characteristics of IDC patients was analyzed. Low nuclear ZBTB7A expression in IDC was significantly associated with larger tumor size (P=0.017), higher histological grade (P<0.001), ER negativity (P<0.001), PR negativity (P=0.001), triple negativity (P<0.001), and recurrence (P=0.044; Table 1). No statistically significant association was found for other clinicopathologic characteristics, including age, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, stage group, or lymphovascular invasion. In contrast with the nuclear ZBTB7A expression, cytoplasmic ZBTB7A expression showed no significant associations with clinicopathological characteristics.
Table 1.
Association between zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A (ZBTB7A) expression and clinicopathological characteristics of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
| Characteristic | Total, n | Nuclear ZBTB7A expression, n (%) | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Low | High | ||||
| Age (years) | >40 | 32 | 23 (71.9) | 9 (28.1) | 0.176 |
| ≤40 | 154 | 97 (59.1) | 67 (40.9) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | >2 | 106 | 73 (58.9) | 33 (31.1) | 0.017* |
| ≤2 | 90 | 47 (52.2) | 43 (47.8) | ||
| Histological grade | 1 | 55 | 22 (40.0) | 33 (60.0) | <0.001* |
| 2 | 80 | 53 (66.3) | 27 (33.8) | ||
| 3 | 61 | 45 (73.8) | 16 (26.2) | ||
| Pathological T stage | pT1 | 92 | 52 (56.5) | 40 (43.5) | 0.227 |
| pT2 | 99 | 65 (65.7) | 34 (34.3) | ||
| pT3 | 4 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | ||
| pT4 | 1 | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Pathological N stage | pN0 | 106 | 64 (60.4) | 42 (39.6) | 0.355 |
| pN1 | 57 | 33 (57.9) | 24 (42.1) | ||
| pN2 | 17 | 11 (64.7) | 6 (35.3) | ||
| pN3 | 16 | 12 (75.0) | 4 (25.0) | ||
| Distant metastasis | Present | 18 | 11 (61.1) | 7 (38.9) | 0.992 |
| Absent | 178 | 109 (61.2) | 69 (38.9) | ||
| Stage | I | 65 | 35 (53.8) | 30 (46.2) | 0.126 |
| II | 97 | 62 (63.9) | 35 (36.1) | ||
| III | 33 | 22 (66.7) | 11 (33.3) | ||
| IV | 1 | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| ER | Positive | 144 | 74 (51.4) | 70 (48.6) | <0.001* |
| Negative | 52 | 46 (88.5) | 6 (11.5) | ||
| PR | Positive | 131 | 69 (52.7) | 62 (47.3) | <0.001* |
| Negative | 65 | 51 (78.5) | 14 (21.5) | ||
| HER2 | Positive | 54 | 38 (70.4) | 16 (29.6) | 0.105 |
| Negative | 142 | 82 (57.7) | 60 (42.3) | ||
| Triple negativity | Yes | 26 | 25 (96.2) | 1 (3.8) | <0.001* |
| No | 170 | 95 (55.9) | 75 (44.1) | ||
| Recurrence | Yes | 29 | 23 (79.3) | 6 (20.7) | 0.044* |
| No | 161 | 96 (59.6) | 65 (40.4) | ||
ER: Estrogen receptor; PR: Progesterone receptor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ZBTB7A: zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A.
Statistically significant.
Effects of ZBTB7A expression on outcome of patients with IDC
The median follow-up time was 87 months. The 5-year OS and RFS rate was 96.4% and 88.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis of OS revealed that distant metastasis (P<0.001), advanced stage (P=0.038), and triple negativity (P=0.043) significantly predicted poor OS (Table 2). There was no significant difference in OS according to nuclear ZBTB7A expression status (Figure 2A). The difference in OS according to the higher histologic grade showed marginal significance (P=0.063, representatively). Multivariate analysis of OS revealed that distant metastasis was a significant predictor of poor OS (P<0.001). Univariate analysis of RFS revealed that distant metastasis (P<0.001) and triple negativity (P=0.033) were significant predictors of poor RFS (Table 2). The difference in RFS according to the nuclear ZBTB7A expression status showed marginal significance (P=0.069; Figure 2B). In multivariate analysis of RFS, distant metastasis (P<0.001) and low nuclear ZBTB7A expression (P=0.009) were significant predictors of poor RFS. Low nuclear ZBTB7A expression was found to independently predict RFS (hazard ratio =3.432, 95% confidence interval =1.364-8.637; Table 2). Cytoplasmic ZBTB7A expression did not affect OS or RFS.
Table 2.
Factors predicting shortened overall and recurrence-free survival of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
| Characteristic | Overall survival | Recurrence-free survival | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|
|
|
|||||
| p-Value | p-Value | Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) | p-Value | p-Value | Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) | |
| Age >40 years | 0.885 | Not applicable | 0.819 | Not applicable | ||
| Higher histological grade | 0.063 | 0.069 | 6.939 (0.857-56.182) | 0.551 | Not applicable | |
| pT2-4 | 0.592 | Not applicable | 0.736 | Not applicable | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.437 | Not applicable | 0.493 | Not applicable | ||
| Distant metastasis | <0.001* | <0.001* | 65.143 (15.980-265.551) | <0.001* | <0.001* | 38.390 (16.464-89.520) |
| Advanced stage | 0.038* | 0.703 | 1.515 (0.179-12.854) | 0.106 | Not applicable | |
| ER negativity | 0.119 | Not applicable | 0.222 | Not applicable | ||
| PR negativity | 0.143 | Not applicable | 0.098 | 0.626 | 0.780 (0.288-2.115) | |
| HER2 negativity | 0.902 | Not applicable | 0.357 | Not applicable | ||
| Triple negativity | 0.043* | 0.179 | 2.289 (0.683-7.669) | 0.033* | 0.446 | 1.409 (0.583-3.404) |
| Low nuclear ZBTB7A expression | 0.843 | Not applicable | 0.069 | 0.009* | 3.432 (1.364-8.637) | |
ER: Estrogen receptor; PR: Progesterone receptor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ZBTB7A: zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A.
Statistically significant.
Figure 2.

Prognostic significance of zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A (ZBTB7A) expression in patients with breast cancer. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating (A) overall survival and (B) recurrence-free survival.
Discussion
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Various histological types of breast cancer have been reported, with IDC being the most frequently occurring type [24,25]. The immunohistochemical expression of ER, PR, and HER2 has been widely used for predicting the prognosis of breast cancer and for providing therapeutic strategies [26]. Since Perou et al. [27] reported the molecular features of breast cancer cells in 2000, the improvements in molecular techniques have provided a framework to establish molecular subtypes, namely luminal A; luminal B (HER2-negative); luminal B (HER2-positive), HER2 subtype; basal phenotype; and five negative phenotypes [27-29]. Breast cancer-expressed hormonal receptors, including ER and PR, or amplification of HER2, have been used in various targeted treatment approaches [30,31]. However, the effort has been devoted to identifying factors of prognostic and therapeutic significance in IDC, one of which is ZBTB7A. ZBTB7A mRNA and protein have been identified in both normal and cancerous tissues of multiple organs, and the expression of ZBTB7A in cancer has provided ambivalent results. Some researchers have reported that ZBTB7A has unfavorable prognostic effects in several malignancies by suppressing p14ARF or upregulating survivin [7,10,11,13-15]. On the other hand, favorable prognostic effects of ZBTB7A expression have also been reported. Reduced ZBTB7A expression has been associated with worse prognosis through affecting another pathway such as upregulation of MCAM or repression of glycolysis or survivin, implicating its tumor-suppressive role [12,16-18]. Based on these reports, ZBTB7A appears to play several different roles in malignancy through variable molecular pathways.
In this study, the immunohistochemical expression of ZBTB7A was analyzed in patients with IDC. Low nuclear ZBTB7A expression was significantly associated with aggressive oncogenic behavior including larger tumor size, higher histological grade, and recurrence. In addition, reduced ZBTB7A expression in the tumor cell nuclei correlated with negative ER and PR expression. The triple-negative phenotype was more frequently observed in patients whose tumors showed low nuclear ZBTB7A expression. ZBTB7A expression was not statistically associated with OS. Only distant metastasis was an independent prognostic factor for OS. No clinicopathological parameters influenced the RFS except distant metastasis and triple negativity. Even though RFS of patients with low nuclear ZBTB7A expression was lower than that of patients with high nuclear ZBTB7A expression, the difference was statistically marginally significant. Nevertheless, in multivariate analysis for RFS, low nuclear ZBTB7A expression was found to independently predict RFS, suggesting that ZBTB7A expression is a novel prognostic biomarker for RFS of patients with IDC. Our results agree with those of previous studies demonstrating an association between low ZBTB7A expression and aggressive oncogenic behavior in non-small cell lung cancer, ovary carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma [7,10,11,13].
In conclusion, we demonstrate that low nuclear ZBTB7A expression is associated with unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics including larger tumor size, higher histological grade, negativity for ER and PR, triple negativity, and recurrence in IDC. In addition, there was a significant relationship between low nuclear expression of ZBTB7A and poor RFS. Our data suggest that nuclear ZBTB7A expression is a novel prognostic biomarker for patients with breast cancer.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A1B03935584) and the Medical Research Funds from Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (2016).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Lee SU, Maeda T. POK/ZBTB proteins: an emerging family of proteins that regulate lymphoid development and function. Immunol Rev. 2012;247:107–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01116.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lunardi A, Guarnerio J, Wang G, Maeda T, Pandolfi PP. Role of LRF/Pokemon in lineage fate decisions. Blood. 2013;121:2845–2853. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-11-292037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morrison DJ, Pendergrast PS, Stavropoulos P, Colmenares SU, Kobayashi R, Hernandez N. FBI-1, a factor that binds to the HIV-1 inducer of short transcripts (IST), is a POZ domain protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1251–1262. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.5.1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aggarwal A, Hunter WJ 3rd, Aggarwal H, Silva ED, Davey MS, Murphy RF, Agrawal DK. Expression of leukemia/lymphoma-related factor (LRF/POKEMON) in human breast carcinoma and other cancers. Exp Mol Pathol. 2010;89:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aggarwal H, Aggarwal A, Hunter WJ 3rd, Yohannes P, Khan AU, Agrawal DK. Expression of leukemia/lymphoma related factor (LRF/Pokemon) in human benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2011;90:226–230. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pendergrast PS, Wang C, Hernandez N, Huang S. FBI-1 can stimulate HIV-1 Tat activity and is targeted to a novel subnuclear domain that includes the Tat-P-TEFb-containing nuclear speckles. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:915–929. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-08-0383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao ZH, Wang SF, Yu L, Wang J, Chang H, Yan WL, Zhang J, Fu K. Overexpression of Pokemon in non-small cell lung cancer and foreshowing tumor biological behavior as well as clinical results. Lung Cancer. 2008;62:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu XS, Liu Z, Gerarduzzi C, Choi DE, Ganapathy S, Pandolfi PP, Yuan ZM. Somatic human ZBTB7A zinc finger mutations promote cancer progression. Oncogene. 2016;35:3071–3078. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhao Y, Yao YH, Li L, An WF, Chen HZ, Sun LP, Kang HX, Wang S, Hu XR. Pokemon enhances proliferation, cell cycle progression and anti-apoptosis activity of colorectal cancer independently of p14ARF-MDM2-p53 pathway. Med Oncol. 2014;31:288. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0288-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang L, Siu MK, Wong OG, Tam KF, Lam EW, Ngan HY, Le XF, Wong ES, Chan HY, Cheung AN. Overexpression of proto-oncogene FBI-1 activates membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase in association with adverse outcome in ovarian cancers. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:318. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shi DB, Wang YW, Xing AY, Gao JW, Zhang H, Guo XY, Gao P. C/EBPalpha-induced miR-100 expression suppresses tumor metastasis and growth by targeting ZBTB7A in gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;369:376–385. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maeda T, Hobbs RM, Merghoub T, Guernah I, Zelent A, Cordon-Cardo C, Teruya-Feldstein J, Pandolfi PP. Role of the proto-oncogene Pokemon in cellular transformation and ARF repression. Nature. 2005;433:278–285. doi: 10.1038/nature03203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fang F, Yang L, Tao Y, Qin W. FBI-1 promotes cell proliferation and enhances resistance to chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer. 2012;118:134–146. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qu H, Qu D, Chen F, Zhang Z, Liu B, Liu H. ZBTB7 overexpression contributes to malignancy in breast cancer. Cancer Invest. 2010;28:672–678. doi: 10.3109/07357901003631007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zu X, Ma J, Liu H, Liu F, Tan C, Yu L, Wang J, Xie Z, Cao D, Jiang Y. Pro-oncogene Pokemon promotes breast cancer progression by upregulating survivin expression. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R26. doi: 10.1186/bcr2843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hartmann L, Dutta S, Opatz S, Vosberg S, Reiter K, Leubolt G, Metzeler KH, Herold T, Bamopoulos SA, Braundl K, Zellmeier E, Ksienzyk B, Konstandin NP, Schneider S, Hopfner KP, Graf A, Krebs S, Blum H, Middeke JM, Stolzel F, Thiede C, Wolf S, Bohlander SK, Preiss C, Chen-Wichmann L, Wichmann C, Sauerland MC, Buchner T, Berdel WE, Wormann BJ, Braess J, Hiddemann W, Spiekermann K, Greif PA. ZBTB7A mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia with t(8;21) translocation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11733. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu XS, Genet MD, Haines JE, Mehanna EK, Wu S, Chen HI, Chen Y, Qureshi AA, Han J, Chen X, Fisher DE, Pandolfi PP, Yuan ZM. ZBTB7A suppresses melanoma metastasis by transcriptionally repressing MCAM. Mol Cancer Res. 2015;13:1206–1217. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu XS, Haines JE, Mehanna EK, Genet MD, Ben-Sahra I, Asara JM, Manning BD, Yuan ZM. ZBTB7A acts as a tumor suppressor through the transcriptional repression of glycolysis. Genes Dev. 2014;28:1917–1928. doi: 10.1101/gad.245910.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang G, Lunardi A, Zhang J, Chen Z, Ala U, Webster KA, Tay Y, Gonzalez-Billalabeitia E, Egia A, Shaffer DR, Carver B, Liu XS, Taulli R, Kuo WP, Nardella C, Signoretti S, Cordon-Cardo C, Gerald WL, Pandolfi PP. Zbtb7a suppresses prostate cancer through repression of a Sox9-dependent pathway for cellular senescence bypass and tumor invasion. Nat Genet. 2013;45:739–746. doi: 10.1038/ng.2654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hojo N, Tatsumi N, Moriguchi N, Matsumura A, Morimoto S, Nakata J, Fujiki F, Nishida S, Nakajima H, Tsuboi A, Oka Y, Hosen N, Hayashi S, Sugiyama H, Oji Y. A Zbtb7a proto-oncogene as a novel target for miR-125a. Mol Carcinog. 2016;55:2001–2009. doi: 10.1002/mc.22446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Do SI, Yoon G, Kim HS, Kim K, Lee H, Do IG, Kim DH, Chae SW, Sohn JH. Increased brahma-related gene 1 expression predicts distant metastasis and shorter survival in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:4873–4882. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:1474–1481. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:241–256. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-SA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA. 2003;289:1421–1424. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.11.1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li CI, Uribe DJ, Daling JR. Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:1046–1052. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Subramaniam S, Bhoo-Pathy N, Taib NA, Tan GH, See MH, Jamaris S, Ho GF, Looi LM, Yip CH. Breast cancer outcomes as defined by the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human growth factor receptor-2 in a multi-ethnic Asian country. World J Surg. 2015;39:2450–2458. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. doi: 10.1038/35021093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schnitt SJ. Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(Suppl 2):S60–64. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Engstrom MJ, Opdahl S, Hagen AI, Romundstad PR, Akslen LA, Haugen OA, Vatten LJ, Bofin AM. Molecular subtypes, histopathological grade and survival in a historic cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:463–473. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2647-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Parise CA, Caggiano V. Breast cancer survival defined by the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes and a surrogate classification according to tumor grade and immunohistochemical biomarkers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:469251. doi: 10.1155/2014/469251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gajria D, Chandarlapaty S. HER2-amplified breast cancer: mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and novel targeted therapies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;11:263–275. doi: 10.1586/era.10.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
