Abstract
We previously found that CD44high/ESAlow head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells harboring high dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression exhibited potent resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced apoptosis. In addition, susceptibility of HNSCC cells to 5-FU was compromised in the presence of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2)-derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). In this study, we examined 5-FU-induced apoptosis in sorted cell populations (i.e., CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low cells from the HNSCC cell line A-253) to clarify the anti-apoptotic effect of PGE2 on CD44high cells. Notably, CD44high/ESAlow cells upregulated PGE2, compared with other populations. To investigate the effect of CD44high/ESAlow cell-derived PGE2 on CD44high/ESAhigh cells, direct and indirect co-culture assays were performed. The percentage of apoptotic cells in a culture of CD44high/ESAhigh cells was significantly reduced when they were directly and indirectly co-cultured with CD44high/ESAlow cells. Furthermore, 5-FU-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells was significantly increased in the presence of an inhibitor of the PGE2 receptors (EP1/EP2) when CD44high/ESAhigh cells were co-cultured with CD44high/ESAlow cells. These results suggest that CD44high/ESAlow cell-derived PGE2 may contribute to the inhibition of 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. Additionally, NR4A2 knockdown enhances 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells, suggesting that PGE2 attenuates 5-FU-induced apoptosis in an NR4A2-dependent manner in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. In conclusion, CD44high/ESAlow cells contribute to induction of resistance to 5-FU in CD44high/ESAhigh cells through provision of PGE2. CD44high/ESAlow cell-targeted therapy may be effective in treatment of HNSCC.
Keywords: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), apoptosis, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), CD44, NR4A2
Introduction
While the mortality rate of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has improved recently, survival rates remain lower than those of other malignant tumours, such as colorectal and breast cancers [1]. In particular, patients with advanced-stage HNSCC exhibit high rates of recurrence and metastasis [2,3]. This worsened prognosis may be associated with the behaviour of a small population of cancer stem cells that may be less sensitive to conventional cancer therapy [4]. In HNSCC, populations of CD44high cells exhibit cancer stem cell (CSC) properties, as well as phenotypic plasticity, such as mesenchymal (i.e., CD44high/ESAlow cells) to epithelial transition (i.e., CD44high/ESAhigh cells) [5]. In addition, CD44high/ESAlow cells exhibited strong resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced apoptosis, along with high dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression [6]. Therefore, we hypothesized that surviving CD44high/ESAlow cells may play an important role in the poor prognosis associated with HNSCC. Additionally, we have reported that susceptibility of HNSCC cells to 5-FU might be compromised following cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2)-derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) delivery to the cancer microenvironment [7]. We suspect that PGE2 might be involved in enhancement of the anti-apoptotic effect in HNSCC cells. However, it remains unknown whether PGE2 can block apoptosis in CD44high cells (i.e., HNSCC cells with CSC properties). In this study, we examined the effect of exogenous PGE2 on 5-FU induced apoptosis in CD44high subpopulations in HNSCC cells. In addition, we examined 5-FU-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells that were co-cultured directly or indirectly with CD44high/ESAlow cells.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and treatment
A HNSCC cell line, A-253 (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, USA), was used in this study. Cells were cultured in a highly supplemented epithelial growth medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium: DMEM), with 10% FBS, under 5% CO2 in air at 37°C [8]. For re-plating and for assays, cells were released into suspension using Accutase (Nakalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). To investigate the effect of the CD44high/ESAlow cells on CD44high/ESAhigh cells, direct co-culture assays were performed by culturing the two cellular populations together. An indirect co-culture system, using Transwell cell culture inserts with microporous membranes (pore size: 1.0 μm) (BD Falcon, Milian, Italy) was also employed to prevent direct cell-to-cell communication. PGE2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). DMSO was used as control for PGE2. PGE2 was added after cells had been cultured without FBS for 48 h. SC-51089 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and AH-6809 (Cayman) were used as EP1 receptor and EP1/EP2 receptor antagonist, respectively. H-89 (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) was used as a cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) inhibitor.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
Anti-CD44-PE-conjugated antibody (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-ESA-APC-conjugated antibody (BD Pharmingen) were used for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen) was used to exclude dead cells during FACS analysis. According to our previously published methodology [9], samples were assayed on a Becton Dickenson FACSCaliburTM (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA); CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low cells were sorted using Becton Dickenson FACSAria equipment.
Apoptosis analyses
We examined apoptosis induced by 5-FU (Wako, Osaka, Japan) in A-253 cells. 1.0 × 104 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and grown for 24 h, then exposed to 25 µg/mL 5-FU for 48 h. Cells were collected and stained with 7-AAD and AnnexinV-Cy5 (BD Pharmingen), then AnnexinV-positive apoptotic fractions were analysed by FACS. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
Introduction of green fluorescent protein (GFP) through viral infection
Introduction of GFP into the cells was performed according to our previously published method [10]. Briefly, virus host cells (HEK293FT cells) were cotransfected with a viral vector plasmid encoding EGFP (pLenti 6.3) (Invitrogen) and packaging plasmid Virapower mix (Invitrogen), using the EGFP X-treme GENE HP reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After 48 h, the viral supernatant was mixed with 8 μg/mL polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich), and then used to infect the target cells by spinoculation.
Measurement of PGE2 concentration
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure PGE2 concentrations via the Prostaglandin E2 Monoclonal Kit (Oxford Biomedical Research, Oxford, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after 24 h incubation of the cells in culture medium with or without FBS, culture media were harvested to determine the PGE2 concentration. The absorbance values were measured using a microplate reader with a 450-nm filter. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis
The RNAeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for RNA extraction and the resulting total RNA was subjected to reverse transcription using the ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Kit (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). Quantification of mRNA levels was performed using the CFX Connect real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO). The reaction mixture contained 1.0 µg of cDNA, 10.0 µL of SYBR Green Mix, and 10 µmol of each pair of oligonucleotide primers. GAPDH was used as a reference control. The primer sequences were as follows: Cox2, 5’-TTGCTGGAACATGGAATTACC-3’ (sense), 5’-TGCCTGCTCTGGTCAATG-3’ (antisense); NR4A2, 5’-GTCTCAGCTGCTCGACACG-3’ (sense), 5’-TTTTGCACT-GTGCGCTTAAA-3’ (antisense); Bcl-2, 5’-CCCTGTGGATGACTGAGTAC-3’ (sense), 5’-GCATGTTGACTTCACTTGTG-3’ (antisense); Bax, 5’-GGCCCACCAGCTCTGAGCAGA-3’ (sense), 5’-GCCACGTGGGCGTCCCAAAGT-3’ (antisense); and G3PDH, 5’-GTGAACCATGAGAAGTATGACAAC-3’ (sense), 5’-ATGAGTCCTTCCACGATACC-3’ (antisense). The PCR program was as follows: initial melting at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 57°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 40 sec. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments.
Western blotting
Protein samples were solubilized in sample buffer by boiling, then separated in a 10% polyacrylamide gel and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Western blot bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting reagent (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Antibodies (all diluted at 1:1000) consisted of an anti-human EP-1 mouse monoclonal anti-body (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), an anti-human EP-2 mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam), and an anti-human GAPDH mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
siRNA knockdown
StealthTM siRNAs were used for NR4A2 knockdown (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and a Stealth siRNA negative control (Life Technologies) served as the control for knockdown. Cells were transfected with siRNA using HiPerFect transfection reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Statistical methods
Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. P values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
Results
PGE2 inhibit 5-FU-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells via EP1/2 receptor
All cell fractions expressed PGE2 receptor, EP1, and EP2 proteins, as shown by Western blotting (Figure 1A). Thus, we analysed the effect of exogenous PGE2 on 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low cells. CD44high/ESAlow cells exhibited the most potent resistance to 5-FU-induced apoptosis. Notably, PGE2 significantly reduced the percentage of 5-FU-induced apoptotic cells in CD44high/ESAhigh cells at concentrations of 10 and 20 ng/mL (Figure 1B). However, PGE2 did not significantly reduce 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAlow and CD44low cells (Figure 1B). 5-FU-induced apoptosis was examined in the presence of PGE2 and either EP1 or EP1/EP2 receptor inhibitor. PGE2-inhibited apoptosis was significantly increased after the addition of either EP1 or EP1/EP2 receptor antagonist (Figure 1C).
Figure 1.

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) inhibits 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells via the EP1/2 receptor. A. EP1 and EP2 expression in CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low fractions of A-253 cells. B. 5-FU induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low cells in the presence of PGE2. C. 5-FU induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells in the presence of PGE2 and either SC-51089 or AH-6809. (Statistical significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 are indicated by *, ** and *** respectively).
CD44high/ESAlow cells produce an increased amount of PGE2 compared than CD44high/ESAhigh cells
Next, we examined the PGE2 production ability of sorted cells. After 24 h incubation of the cells in culture medium without FBS, culture media were collected to determine the PGE2 concentration. CD44high/ESAlow cells exhibited significantly higher PGE2 concentration than CD44high/ESAhigh cells or CD44low cells (Figure 2A). In addition, COX2 mRNA expression was significantly elevated in CD44high/ESAlow cells, compared with CD44high/ESAhigh cells or CD44low cells (Figure 2B).
Figure 2.

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) mRNA expression of CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh and CD44low cells. A. PGE2 concentration of CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low cells. B. COX2 mRNA expression levels of CD44high/ESAlow, CD44high/ESAhigh, and CD44low cells. (Statistical significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 are indicated by *, ** and *** respectively).
Endogenous PGE2 inhibits 5-FU-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells
To investigate the effect of CD44high/ESAlow cell-derived PGE2 on CD44high/ESAhigh cells, direct co-culture assays were performed by culturing the two cellular populations together (Figure 3A). GFP-tagged CD44high/ESAlow cells and CD44high/ESAhigh cells were co-cultured in the presence of 5-FU, followed by determination of the percentage of apoptotic cells within the GFP-negative CD44high/ESAhigh population by FACS. The percentage of apoptotic cells within a culture of CD44high/ESAhigh cells significantly decreased in the presence of CD44high/ESAlow cells, relative to CD44high/ESAhigh cultures grown in the absence of CD44high/ESAlow cells (Figure 3A). Next, indirect co-culture of CD44high/ESAlow and CD44high/ESAhigh cells was performed using Transwell cell culture inserts, in the presence of 5-FU (Figure 3B). The percentage of apoptotic cells within a culture of CD44high/ESAhigh cells was significantly reduced when CD44high/ESAhigh cells were indirectly co-cultured with CD44high/ESAlow cells (Figure 3B). Furthermore, the percentage of apoptotic cells within a culture of CD44high/ESAhigh cells was significantly increased by the addition of SC-51089 and AH-6809 in the presence of 5-FU, when CD44high/ESAhigh cells were indirectly co-cultured with CD44high/ESAlow cells (Figure 3C). These results suggest that CD44high/ESAlow cell-derived PGE2 may contribute to the inhibition of 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells.
Figure 3.

CD44high/ESAlow cell-derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) inhibits 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells. A. Direct co-culture assays of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged CD44high/ESAlow cells and CD44high/ESAhigh cells in the presence of 5-FU. B. Indirect co-culture assays of CD44high/ESAlow cells and CD44high/ESAhigh cells in the presence of 5-FU. C. Indirect co-culture assays of CD44high/ESAlow cells and CD44high/ESAhigh cells in the presence of 5-FU and either SC-51089 or AH-6809. (Statistical significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 are indicated by *, ** and *** respectively).
PGE2 induces NR4A2 expression via PKA dependent manner in CD44high/ESAhigh cells
We previously revealed that exogenous PGE2 induces NR4A2 expression in a PKA-dependent manner in oral SCC cells [7]. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effect of PGE2 on NR4A2 expression in CD44high/ESAlow cells. CD44high/ESAlow cells exhibited a slight increase in NR4A2 mRNA expression in the presence of PGE2 (Figure 4A). However, NR4A2 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in the presence of PGE2 in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. Moreover, PGE2-induced NR4A2 expression was inhibited by the addition of PKA inhibitor in CD44high/ESAhigh cells (Figure 4B).
Figure 4.

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-induced NR4A2 expression was reduced in the presence of protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor. A. NR4A2 mRNA expression in the presence of 20 ng/mL PGE2. B. NR4A2 mRNA expression in the presence of PGE2 and PKA inhibitor in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. (Statistical significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 are indicated by *, ** and *** respectively).
NR4A2-knockdown enhances 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells
Finally, we examined the effect of NR4A2 siRNA knockdown on 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. Following siRNA knockdown of NR4A2, the percentage of apoptotic cells was significantly increased (Figure 5A). In addition, we examined expression of apoptosis-related genes, such as anti-apoptotic Bcl2 and pro-apoptotic Bax, during NR4A2 siRNA knockdown in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. Bcl2 mRNA expression was significantly downregulated after siRNA knockdown of NR4A2 (Figure 5B). In contrast, Bax expression was significantly upregulated after siRNA knockdown of NR4A2 (Figure 5C).
Figure 5.

NR4A2-knockdown enhances 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells. A. The percentage of apoptotic cells after siRNA knockdown of NR4A2. B. Bcl2 mRNA expression following NR4A2 siRNA knockdown in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. C. Bax mRNA expression following NR4A2 siRNA knockdown in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. (Statistical significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 are indicated by *, ** and *** respectively).
Discussion
Several types of cancer can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as PGE2, thereby inducing localized infiltration of inflammatory cells [11-13]. PGE2 is suspected to contribute to modulation of the cancer microenvironment (i.e., cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and angiogenesis, as well as migration and invasion of tumor cells) [14]. There is mounting evidence to support the oncogenic role of PGE2 within the context of the COX2-PGE2-EP1/2-dependent signalling pathway [15,16]. Several studies have reported a significant relationship between COX2 expression and CSC properties [17-20]. For example, there is greater sphere-forming ability within breast cancer cells that upregulate expression of COX-2 and its receptor, EP4. Notably, sphere forming ability is suspected to be a significant feature of CSCs [18]. COX-2 stimulates self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells of glioma via PGE2 [19]. In addition, CSC repopulation has been blocked by the inhibition of the COX2-PGE2 signalling pathway in bladder cancers [20]. These results indicate that PGE2 may play a significant role in the maintenance of CSCs in different types of cancers. In this study, PGE2 was involved in the inhibition of 5-FU-induced apoptosis of CD44high/ESAhigh cells, indicating that PGE2 may contribute to resistance to chemotherapeutics in HNSCC CSCs with epithelial character.
It remains unclear which type of cells (i.e., cancer cells, cancer-associated stromal cells, blood cells, or other normal cells) are the main source of PGE2 in HNSCC. This study revealed that CD44high/ESAlow cells exhibit a greater capacity to produce PGE2, compared with other populations of cells. CD44high/ESAlow cells with both CSC and mesenchymal properties may contribute to PGE2 production in HNSCC. In addition, we found that 5-FU-induced apoptosis was significantly blocked in CD44high/ESAhigh cells when they were co-cultured with CD44high/ESAlow cells. Thus, PGE2 release from CD44high/ESAlow cells may confer anti-apoptotic capacity to CD44high/ESAhigh cells, likely via EP1/EP2 receptor activation. Previously, we found that CD44high/ESAlow cells exhibit strong resistance to other chemotherapeutics (e.g., cisplatin and docetaxel) [9]. Therefore, CD44high/ESAlow cells may be involved in the strong resistance to the conventional chemotherapy that is observed in HNSCC. CD44high subpopulations with potent resistance to chemotherapeutics (e.g., CD44high/ESAlow cells) may not only survive but also aid in the survival of other CD44high subpopulations (e.g., CD44high/ESAhigh cells) in the presence of chemotherapeutics such as 5-FU.
NR4A2 is a member of the orphan nuclear hormone receptor subfamily and is implicated in a wide variety of biological processes [21,22]. NR4As may be capable of inhibiting tumour suppressor signalling [23]. In this study, PGE2-induced NR4A2 expression was inhibited by a PKA inhibitor, suggesting that PGE2 induces NR4A2 expression in a PKA dependent manner within CD44high/ESAhigh cells. The combination of Bcl2 upregulation and Bax downregulation, following NR4A2 siRNA knockdown, strongly supports the notion that NR4A2 contributes to anti-apoptosis signalling in CD44high/ESAhigh cells.
Collectively, our results indicate that CD44high/ESAlow cells play a significant role in the induction of resistance to 5-FU within CD44high/ESAhigh cells, largely by providing PGE2 (Figure 6). Our results suggest that cancer-associated PGE2 may regulate chemotherapeutic resistance in HNSCC. Thus, CD44high/ESAlow cell-targeted chemotherapies (or other potential therapies) may be effective in treatment of HNSCC.
Figure 6.

CD44high/ESAlow cell-derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) inhibits 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. PGE2 release from CD44high/ESAlow cells may contribute to enhanced resistance to 5-FU-induced apoptosis in CD44high/ESAhigh cells. (Statistical significance levels of P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 are indicated by *, ** and *** respectively).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 26463005) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Technology.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M, Matuszewska K, Lefèbvre JL, Greiner RH, Giralt J, Maingon P, Rolland F, Bolla M, Cognetti F, Bourhis J, Kirkpatrick A, van Glabbeke M European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 22931. Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1945–1952. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Campbell BH, Saxman SB, Kish JA, Kim HE, Cmelak AJ, Rotman M, Machtay M, Ensley JF, Chao KS, Schultz CJ, Lee N, Fu KK Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9501/Intergroup. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1937–1944. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prince ME, Sivanandan R, Kaczorowski A, Wolf GT, Kaplan MJ, Dalerba P, Weissman IL, Clarke MF, Ailles LE. Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:973–978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610117104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Biddle A, Liang X, Gammon L, Fazil B, Harper LJ, Emich H, Costea DE, Mackenzie IC. Cancer stem cells in squamous cell carcinoma switch between two distinct phenotypes that are preferentially migratory or proliferative. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5317–5326. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shigeishi H, Biddle A, Gammon L, Rodini CO, Yamasaki M, Seino S, Sugiyama M, Takechi M, Mackenzie IC. Elevation in 5-FU-induced apoptosis in head and neck cancer stem cells by a combination of CDHP and GSK3β inhibitors. J Oral Pathol Med. 2015;44:201–207. doi: 10.1111/jop.12230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shigeishi H, Higashikawa K, Hatano H, Okui G, Tanaka F, Tran TT, Rizqiawan A, Ono S, Tobiume K, Kamata N. PGE2 targets squamous cell carcinoma cell with the activated epidermal growth factor receptor family for survival against 5-fluorouracil through NR4A2 induction. Cancer Lett. 2011;307:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harper LJ, Piper K, Common J, Fortune F, Mackenzie IC. Stem cell patterns in cell lines derived from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:594–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hashikata M, Shigeishi H, Okui G, Yamamoto K, Tobiume K, Seino S, Uetsuki R, Kato H, Ishioka Y, Ono S, Ohta K, Higashikawa K, Sugiyama M, Takechi M. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9:7908–7918. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Okui G, Tobiume K, Rizqiawan A, Yamamoto K, Shigeishi H, Ono S, Higashikawa K, Kamata N. AKT primes snail-induced EMT concomitantly with the collective migration of squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114:2039–2049. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2 and colorectal cancer. Prog Exp Tumor Res. 2003;37:124–137. doi: 10.1159/000071370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chan G, Boyle JO, Yang EK, Zhang F, Sacks PG, Shah JP, Edelstein D, Soslow RA, Koki AT, Woerner BM, Masferrer JL, Dannenberg AJ. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is up-regulated in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 1999;59:991–994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ristimäki A, Sivula A, Lundin J, Lundin M, Salminen T, Haglund C, Joensuu H, Isola J. Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:632–635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang MT, Honn KV, Nie D. Cyclooxygenases, prostanoids, and tumor progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26:525–534. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cha YI, DuBois RN. NSAIDs and cancer prevention: targets downstream of COX-2. Annu Rev Med. 2007;58:239–252. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brouxhon S, Konger RL, VanBuskirk J, Sheu TJ, Ryan J, Erdle B, Almudevar A, Breyer RM, Scott G, Pentland AP. Deletion of prostaglandin E2 EP2 receptor protects against ultraviolet-induced carcinogenesis, but increases tumor aggressiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:439–446. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pang LY, Hurst EA, Argyle DJ. Cyclooxygenase-2: a role in cancer stem cell survival and repopulation of cancer cells during therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:2048731. doi: 10.1155/2016/2048731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kundu N, Ma X, Kochel T, Goloubeva O, Staats P, Thompson K, Martin S, Reader J, Take Y, Collin P, Fulton A. Prostaglandin E receptor EP4 is a therapeutic target in breast cancer cells with stem-like properties. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;143:19–31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2779-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wu M, Guan J, Li C, Gunter S, Nusrat L, Ng S, Dhand K, Morshead C, Kim A, Das S. Aberrantly activated Cox-2 and Wnt signaling interact to maintain cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:82217–8223. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu Q, Yuan W, Tong D, Liu G, Lan W, Zhang D, Xiao H, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Yang J, Zhang J, Jiang J. Metformin represses bladder cancer progression by inhibiting stem cell repopulation via COX2/PGE2/STAT3 axis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:28235–28246. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Z, Benoit G, Liu J, Prasad S, Aarnisalo P, Liu X, Xu H, Walker NP, Perlmann T. Structure and function of Nurr1 identifies a class of ligand-independent nuclear receptors. Nature. 2003;423:555–560. doi: 10.1038/nature01645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Law SW, Conneely OM, DeMayo FJ, O’Malley BW. Identification of a new brain-specific transcription factor, NURR1. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6:2129–2135. doi: 10.1210/mend.6.12.1491694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beard JA, Tenga A, Chen T. The interplay of NR4A receptors and the oncogene-tumor suppressor networks in cancer. Cell Signal. 2015;27:257–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
