Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2018 May 1;11(5):2497–2505.

Primary hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor in bone: a case report and review of the literature

Weihua Hou 1,*, Congyang Li 1,*, Changsheng Guo 1, Liming Zhang 2, Xiangchao Meng 1, Qiying Liu 3, Jian Wang 3
PMCID: PMC6958266  PMID: 31938362

Abstract

Background and aim: Hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor (HFLT) is a locally invasive tumor composed of mature adipocytes accompanied by spindle cells containing hemosiderin deposition. In 2013, it was categorized by WHO as a soft tissue tumor with uncertain differentiation. So far, the literature has reported 60 cases but primary HFLT in bone has never before been reported. We set out to investigate the clinicopathological features of primary HFLT in bone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, imaging, histological, and immunophenotypic features and treatment of 1 case of primary HFLT in bone, and combined this with literature discussion. Results: HFLT occurred in the lateral femoral condyle of a 50-year-old male patient, which might have been overlooked were it not for the knee-joint pain and dysfunction. CT and MRI showed osteolytic bone destruction with a clear 4.0-cm diameter boundary, diagnosed as cystic damage of the lateral condyle of the left femur. SPECT metabolism was not active. Histologically, the lesion was composed of different proportions of mature fat cells, spindle cells, and hemosiderin. Immunohistochemistry revealed spindle cells expressing vimentin, p63, but not CD34, calponin, and others. The tumor tissue was thoroughly removed by curetting, and a bone graft was carried out after immersion in anhydrous ethanol. At the 11-month postoperative follow-up, the patient was recovering well. Conclusions: Primary HFLT in bone is extremely rare. In imaging, it can easily be misdiagnosed as a bone cyst. Histological morphology of the current case is similar to that of soft tissue HFLT.

Keywords: Femur/Bone, hemosiderin, fibrous tissue cells, lipoma

Introduction

Hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor (HFLT) is a locally invasive tumor composed of mature adipocytes accompanied by spindle cells containing hemosiderin deposition, which is also known as fibrohistiocytic lipoma [1]. It was first reported by Marshall-Taylor and Fanburg-Smith [1] in 2000, but is relatively rare. Including our report, a total of 60 cases HFLT have been published in the scientific literature [1-14]. In 2013, it was categorized by WHO as a soft tissue tumor with uncertain differentiation [15].

HFLT occurs mainly in middle-aged female patients, with lesions often located on the ankle or superficial soft tissue of limb extremities [1-14]. HFLT in bone has never before been reported. We now report a case of a 50-year-old male patient with HFLT diagnosed on the lateral femoral condyle of the left femur. The clinical, imaging, morphologic, and immunohistochemical features, and the treatment of this patient, are described and discussed along with a review of the literature to improve understanding of this type of tumor.

Case presentation

Clinical manifestation

The patient was a 50-year-old male farmer who had suffered pain in the left knee joint without apparent cause for 15 days. The pain was persistent, being aggravated by fatigue and alleviated after resting, without any other discomfort such as fever or morning stiffness. The patient was admitted to our hospital (People’s Liberation Army 152 Hospital), due to aggravated pain and limited joint motion for the past 4 days. According to the patient’s medical history, it was confirmed that he was healthy and without any history of trauma or other organ tumor. Physical examination demonstrated swelling of the left knee joint and tenderness of the lateral femoral condyle. His patellar grind test was positive, but negative for the rotary extrusion test, anterior and posterior drawer test, and lateral force test. No other abnormality was observed.

Auxiliary examination

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; i_Open0.5T, China Resources Wandong Medical Equipment Co, Beijing, China) of the left knee joint was carried out at the local hospital, in which the weighted image of T1 and proton density (PD) showed osteolytic bone destruction with a clear boundary and a hybrid image of relatively low and slightly higher signal (Figure 1A, 1B), indicating cystic damage of the left lateral condyle of the femur and medial condyle bone marrow edema. Computed tomography (CT) (Philips Brilliance 256-iCT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) examination conducted in our hospital showed cystic damage (4.0 × 2.5 × 1.9 cm) of the lateral condyle of the left femur, with a clear border (Figure 1C-F). A single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT (Optima NM/CT 640, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisc) image, taken 3 hours after intravenous injection of 99 mTc MDP 25 mCi, clearly showed the bones of the entire body including oval, low-density areas on the left side of the lateral femoral condyle with marginal bone sclerosis. Sparse nuclide distribution was observed in the lesion area with no obvious active metabolism, along with nuclide concentrated in the left medial femoral condyle above the lesions and the left medial tibial condyle (Figure 1F). Concentrated or sparse nuclide distribution was not observed in any other bone area. Normal imaging of both kidneys was observed. SPECT/CT diagnosis was of a benign cystic lesion of the left lateral femoral condyle, with active bone metabolism observed on the upper surface of the left lateral femoral condyle, left medial femoral condyle, and left medial tibial condyle. Laboratory tests showed that alkaline phosphatase and other indicators of the test results were in the normal range.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Primary HFLT in bone. A. MRI T1WI showing osteolytic destruction of lateral condyle of left femur with a clear boundary; lesion area shows a hybrid image shadow of slightly higher and slightly lower signal. B. MRI adipose-suppression, PD-weighted images showing hybrid image shadow of slightly higher and slightly lower signal. C. CT-reconstructed coronal and transverse planes (inserted image) of soft tissue and left lateral femoral condylar lesions showing cystic low-density shadow with clear boundary. D and E. CT 3-D reconstruction. The lesion is cystlike with a clear boundary and visible separation (insert shows tumor clearly visible after staining). F. CT-reconstructed sagittal and transverse (left insert) image of bone lesion showing ovate, low-density lesion with uneven, visible septation and marginal bone sclerosis. SPECT/CT showing sparse distribution of the nuclide in lesions, with marginal sclerotic region without obvious metabolic activity and concentrated nuclide-flanking lesion (right insert).

Treatment and follow-up

Initial clinical diagnosis was left knee arthritis and cyst of the left lateral femoral condyle, on which surgery was carried out. Intraoperative arthroscopy showed hyperemia of the left suprapatellar bursa and synovial membrane of the medial knee with slight hyperplasia, cordlike synovial plicae anterior to the medial femoral condyle, normal tension of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and basically normal inner and outer meniscus, with no special treatment conducted. Then the lateral femoral condyle of the left knee was exposed. A bone knife was used to chisel a 1 × 0.5-cm opening on the cyst wall, the inner tissue of the cyst thoroughly removed by curetting, and a bone graft carried out after immersion in anhydrous ethanol. The scraped tissue was saved as a pathological specimen. Follow-up at 14 months post-operation suggested that the patient recovered well.

Materials and methods

The tumor specimens were fixed in 10% neutral formalin, then conventional paraffin sectioning and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were performed. The morphology of tumor tissue was observed under a light microscope. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the EliVision two-step method, and the surgical steps were carried out according to the instructions. Antigen repair was performed at high temperature and high pressure using potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 1 mmol/L pH 9.0)/citric acid (0.01 M, pH 6.0) antigen repair fluid, or protease digestion. The primary antibodies and their pretreatment methods are listed in Table 1. The primary antibodies and EliVision kit were provided by Maixin Biotech (catalog No. KIT-5930, Fuzhou, China).

Table 1.

Antibodies used and their pretreatments

Antibody Clone Pretreatment
Vimentin V9 Citric acid
p63 4A4 Citric acid
CD34 QBEnd/10 Citric acid
Catenin-β 17c2 Citric acid
CD10 56C6 EDTA
S-100 protein 4C4.9 Citric acid
SMA 1A4 No pretreatment
MSA HHF35 No pretreatment
Desmin D33 No pretreatment
CD117 YR145 EDTA
CD68 KP1 Trypsin digestion
CD123 BR4MS EDTA
CD163 10D6 Citric acid
ALK 5A4 Citric acid
p53 DO-7 Citric acid
p16 6H12 Citric acid
EMA E29 No pretreatment
Ki-67 MIB-1 Citric acid

Results

Pathological examination

The obtained tissue was pale grey, white, brown, and broken, about 3 × 2.5 × 0.5 cm in size, with an uneven texture. Microscopic examination showed that the lesion consisted of unevenly distributed mature adipocytes and fibroblast-like spindle cells containing hemosiderin deposits. The spindle cells had round or fatty, spindly nuclei, fine chromatin, slightly acidic cytoplasm, and no obvious nuclear fission. The spindle cells were arranged in sheets, bundles, or whirlpools. Fibrous septa between fat lobules contained short spindle cells, which were arranged either in fascicles or interspersed among the adipocytes. Some of the tissue was pure adipose. Uneven hemosiderin distribution was observed in the spindle-cell areas, with macrophages engulfing hemosiderin seen in a focal or scattered pattern, as well as multinucleated giant cells observed in some areas (Figures 2, 3 and 4). Different degrees of reactive inflammatory cells were seen in the tumor tissue, including mast cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils. There was only a small amount of residual bone fragments in the lesion, and no hematopoietic tissue was observed. In the HFLT, there were no small aggregates of damaged capillaries or small blood vessels with thrombosis and perivascular hyalinization, nor were there myxoid stromata.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Primary HFLT in bone. (A-D) Lesions were composed mainly of mature adipocytes and fibroblast-like spindle cells, with locally visible residual trabecular bone. (H&E staining; ×40 [A], ×200 [B, C], and ×400 [D]).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Primary HFLT in bone. (A) Rich spindled cells. (B) Uneven distribution of hemosiderin deposition. (C, D) Spindle cells arranged in bundles with nuclei in fatty, fusiform, fine chromatin, and eosinophilic cytoplasm, note also the scattered pigment deposition. (H&E staining; ×100 [A], ×200 [B], and ×400 [C, D]).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Primary HFLT in bone. (A) Spindle cells grew around individual adipocytes. (B) Spindle cells interspersed among the adipocytes, with remnant trabecular bone seen in tumor tissue. (C) Locally visible foam cells and focal lymphocytic infiltration. (D) Locally visible multinuclear giant cells. (H&E staining; ×400 [A, B, D], and ×200 [C]).

Immunophenotype findings

Immunohistochemistry revealed spindle cells expressing vimentin, p63 (the proportion of positive expression was about 60%-70%) (Figure 5A) but not CD34 (Figure 5B), calponin, β-catenin, CD10, S-100 protein, alpha smooth muscle actin, actin, desmin, CD117, CD68, CD123, CD163, lysozyme, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, p53, p16, nor epithelial membrane antigen, with a Ki-67 proliferation index of <4%.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Primary HFLT in bone. (A) p63 positive expression rate of spindle cells in immunohistochemistry was about 60%. (B) Immunohistochemistry showing that spindle cells were CD34 negative. (Immunohistochemical staining; ×200 [A], and ×400 [B]).

The final pathological diagnosis was femoral HFLT.

Discussion

In this report, we reviewed all 60 published documented cases of HFLT, attempt to looking for seemingly reproducible clinicopathological and Cytogenetics features [1-14] (Table 2). We aimed to investigate the clinical, imaging, and histopathologic features of primary HFLT in bone.

Table 2.

Reported lesion site, expression of CD34, and TGFBR3/MGEA5 status or chromosome t (1;10) of HFLT

Study No. of patients Soft Tissue/Bone CD34 Positive TGFBR3 and/or MGEA5 Rearrangement T (1;10)
Marshall et al. [1] 10 10/0 3/3 - -
Kazakov et al. [2] 2 2/0 2/2 - -
Browne et al. [3] 13 13/0 7/9 - -
Luzar et al. [4] 1 1/0 1/1 - -
West et al. [5] 1 1/0 1/1 - -
De Vreeze et al. [6] 1 1/0 1/1 - -
Wettach et al. [7] 1 1/0 1/1 - 1/1
Hallor et al. [8] 1 1/0 - 1/1 -
Moretti et al. [9] 1 1/0 - - -
Ramalho et al. [10] 1 1/0 1/1 - -
Antonescu et al. [11] 14 14/0 - 12/14 -
Carter et al. [12] 7 7/0 - 2/7 -
O’Driscoll et al. [13] 5 5/0 - - -
Zreik et al. [14] 1 1/0 - 1/1 -
Current study 1 0/1 0/1 - -

-: Not available or not test.

Our review suggests that HFLT predominately occurs during the middle-aged women (median age, 50 years; range: 0.7-78 years), the ratio of male to female was 1:2.8 (or 16:44) [1-14] with close to half (46%) the cases having a history of trauma or vascular disease [3]. HFLT occurs in the shallow soft tissue of limb extremities, which is most common in the foot/ankle (66%) [1-10,12-14], but also involves the hands, forearms, and legs [6,10-13], and occasionally the cheek [1].

However, HFLT in bone has never been reported in the literature. The course of HFLT often lasts up to several years before the appearance of obvious symptoms [1,3,9,15]. In the current case, HFLT occurred in the patient’s lateral femoral condyle, which might have been overlooked were it not for the knee joint pain and dysfunction. Morphological features of the current case were similar to that of soft tissue HFLT. It has been reported that most cases (89.4%) of HFLT are characterized by CD34 expression in spindle cells [1-7,10]. However, the current case tested negative for CD34 expression. In addition, high expression of p63 was observed in the current case, indicating that p63 markers might help distinguish HFLT, which has never been reported in the literature of HFLT cases.

The imaging change of bone in primary HFLT shows characteristics of a tumor with a clear boundary. The internal structure of the tumor varied because of the different proportions of fibrous tissue, adipose tissue, and hemosiderin in various regions, demonstrating varied images. Through CT value determination and fat suppression, CT and MRI can explicitly demonstrate which part of the tumor is in the nature of adipose tissue [6,16-19], while another part showed hybrid adipose and fiber signal image [5]; the content of hemosiderin can vary [5,9], demonstrating low signals from both T1WI and T2WI and high signals from short tau inversion recovery sequences [20,21]. PECT metabolism was not active. Due to the limited imaging description of HFLT [6,9], there is no diagnostic experience in the imaging of bone HFLT. Therefore, it is easy to be misdiagnosed as a bone cyst.

The differential diagnosis of bone tumors is generally based on clinical, imaging, and histopathological features, sometimes in combination with immunohistochemical or molecular genetic characteristics. In this case, in addition to the clinical characteristics of age, lesion location, and insidious onset, the imaging showed a single-bone focus with a clear boundary and induration, suggesting a slowly progressing lesion. From a pathological perspective, this case should be differentiated from lesions of similar histomorphology: (1) Pigmented villonodular synovitis/diffusive giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath, which is a kind of fibrous-tissue-cell tumor usually originating from a joint, tendon sheath, or slippery bursa synovial tissue, showing infiltrating growth of synovial tissue, with a tumor containing hemosiderin deposition and relatively unified tumor cells, mostly round or ovate. In rare cases, the tumor cells in the lesions can have a short fusiform shape and they may infiltrate adipose tissue, similar to HFLT. However, nuclear fission is common in a large number of multinucleated giant cells scattered within the tumor. Immunohistochemical expression of tissue-cell markers are demonstrated, which can be easily identified; (2) Giant cell tumor of the bone, is composed of tumorous, ovoid mononuclear cells and uniformly distributed osteoclast-like giant cells. In rare cases, the mononuclear cells in the giant cell tumor are fusiform with a small number of giant cells that are accompanied by hemorrhage and hemosiderotic deposition with p63 expression [22], which is similar to HFLT and need to be differentiated; (3) Adipose-derived tumor, usually a spindle-shaped-cell lipoma and lipofibromatosis, both of which contain adipocytes and spindle-shaped, fibroblast-like cells, ropelike collagen, and a lack of hemosiderin-containing features of HFLT. Immunohistochemistry shows that both diseases demonstrate different levels of expression of MSA and SMA, but not HFLT [3,9,15,23,24]; (4) The marginal region of a pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor (PHAT), and myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS) demonstrates histological features similar to those of HFLT, with relatively mild spindle-cell infiltration of adipose tissue and deposition of hemosiderin. However, PHAT shows obvious plexiform expansion of thin-walled vessels with fibrin-like material deposition, and cytoplasmic pseudo inclusion bodies seen in the nuclei of tumor cells. MIFS lesions contain high mucus-but low adipose-content, while usually little or no mucus is produced in HFLT. In addition, CD34 can be expressed in all three diseases [12,25], with a similar cytogenetic phenotype, behave as a clonal reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 1 and 10, or TGFBR3 and/or MGEA5 gene rearrangements. Therefore, it is theorized that HFLT may be a precursor lesion of PHAT and MIFS [4,8,11,12,25-27].

Carter et al. [12] found TGFBR3 and/or MGEA5 rearrangements in 28.6% of classical HFLT, a very lower percentage than in prior studies (88.2%, 15/17) [7,11,14,27]. This may partly reflect previous studies with cases known as t (1;10) enriched cytogenetic [8,11,12], or perhaps merely represent statistical variation [12]. The number of cases studied so far is very small, and the TGFBR3 and MGEA5 Rearrangements are Much More Common in “Hybrid” HFLT-MIFS [11,12,14,25], so, cytogenetics of HFLT should be studied further.

HFLT has the biological behavior of locally invasive growth, which can easily relapse (30%-50%) [1,3,9,15,24], but rarely metastasizes [23]. The effective treatment is to remove the tumor as a whole and completely scrape away the tumor tissue (for those occurring in bone), with inactivation treatment for any tumor cells that might have survived to reduce the chance of recurrence. Of course, treatment should improve in the future.

In conclusion, primary bone HFLT, which demonstrates morphological features similar to those occurring outside the bone, is very rare. Preoperative imaging diagnosis and confirmative diagnosis by biopsy using coarse needle aspiration has important, guiding significance for clinical choice of suitable treatment. The epidemiological characteristics and prognosis of bone primary HFLT should be studied further.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Marshall-Taylor C, Fanburg-Smith JC. Hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: ten cases of a previously undescribed fatty lesion of the foot/ankle. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:1192–1199. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kazakov DV, Sima R, Michal M. Hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: clinical correlation with venous stasis. Virchows Arch. 2005;447:103–106. doi: 10.1007/s00428-005-1223-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Browne TJ, Fletcher CD. Haemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumour (so-called haemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous tumour): analysis of 13 new cases in support of a distinct entity. Histopathology. 2006;48:453–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luzar B, Gasljevic G, Juricic V, Bracko M. Hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: early pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor? Pathol Int. 2006;56:283–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2006.01955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.West AT, Toms AP, Murphy J, Sultan M. Haemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion/tumour of the foot: MRI and histopathology. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:71–74. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0397-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Vreeze RS, Koops W, Haas RL, van Coevorden F. An unusual case of hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: correlation of MRI and pathologic findings. Sarcoma. 2008;2008:893918. doi: 10.1155/2008/893918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wettach GR, Boyd LJ, Lawce HJ, Magenis RE, Mansoor A. Cytogenetic analysis of a hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;182:140–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hallor KH, Sciot R, Staaf J, Heidenblad M, Rydholm A, Bauer HC, Astrom K, Domanski HA, Meis JM, Kindblom LG, Panagopoulos I, Mandahl N, Mertens F. Two genetic pathways, t(1;10) and amplification of 3p11-12, in myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, haemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumour, and morphologically similar lesions. J Pathol. 2009;217:716–727. doi: 10.1002/path.2513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moretti VM, Brooks JS, Ogilvie CM. Case report: hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: a clinicopathologic characterization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2808–2813. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1242-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ramalho AR, Nunes MN, Adad SJ, Leitao SA, Micheletti AM. Hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: case report and review of the literature. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009;127:174–176. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802009000300012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Antonescu CR, Zhang L, Nielsen GP, Rosenberg AE, Dal Cin P, Fletcher CD. Consistent t(1;10) with rearrangements of TGFBR3 and MGEA5 in both myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma and hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50:757–764. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Carter JM, Sukov WR, Montgomery E, Goldblum JR, Billings SD, Fritchie KJ, Folpe AL. TGFBR3 and MGEA5 rearrangements in pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumors and the spectrum of related neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:1182–1992. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.O’Driscoll D, Athanasian E, Hameed M, Hwang S. Radiological imaging features and clinicopathological correlation of hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor: experience in a single tertiary cancer center. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:641–648. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-2078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zreik RT, Carter JM, Sukov WR, Ahrens WA, Fritchie KJ, Montgomery EA, Weiss SW, Folpe AL. TGFBR3 and MGEA5 rearrangements are much more common in “hybrid” hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor-myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcomas than in classical myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcomas: a morphological and fluorescence in situ hybridization study. Hum Pathol. 2016;53:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fanburg-Smith JC, Fletcher CD, Mertens F. Hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumours. 4th edition. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013. pp. 210–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unni KK, Inwards CY, Bridge JA, Kindblom LG. tumors of the bones and joints. 4th edition. Washington: ARP Press; 2005. AFIP atlas of tumor pathology; pp. 126–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:733–739. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ, Peterson JJ, O’Connor MI. Benign fatty tumors: classification, clinical course, imaging appearance, and treatment. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:719–733. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0189-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Walden MJ, Murphey MD, Vidal JA. Incidental enchondromas of the knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1611–1615. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barile A, Sabatini M, Iannessi F, Di Cesare E, Splendiani A, Calvisi V, Masciocchi C. Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) of the knee joint: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using standard and dynamic paramagnetic contrast media. Report of 52 cases surgically and histologically controlled. Radiol Med. 2004;107:356–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lin J, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA, Ellis JH. Pigmented villonodular synovitis and related lesions: the spectrum of imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:191–197. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee CH, Espinosa I, Jensen KC, Subramanian S, Zhu SX, Varma S, Montgomery KD, Nielsen TO, van de Rijn M, West RB. Gene expression profiling identifies p63 as a diagnostic marker for giant cell tumor of the bone. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:531–539. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3801023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goldblum JR, Folpe AL, Weiss SW, Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Enzinger and Weiss’s soft tissue tumors. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2014. pp. 992–993. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marshall-Taylor C, Fanburg-Smith JC. Fibrohistiocytic lipoma: twelve cases of a previously undescribed benign fatty tumor. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;4:354–360. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2000.19396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boland JM, Folpe AL. Hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor, pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor, and myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma: related or not? Adv Anat Pathol. 2017;24:268–277. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elco CP, Marino-Enriquez A, Abraham JA, Dal Cin P, Hornick JL. Hybrid myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma/hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor: report of a case providing further evidence for a pathogenetic link. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:1723–1727. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181f17d51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor: analysis of 41 cases supporting evolution from a distinctive precursor lesion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:1417–1425. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000141406.02581.fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES