Abstract
The incidence of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A (PA) infection is on the rise and no licensed vaccines are available. We evaluated cell mediated immune (CMI) responses elicited in volunteers following immunization with a single dose (109 or 1010 cfu) of a novel attenuated live oral PA-vaccine strain (CVD 1902). Results showed increases in PA-lipopolysaccharide-specific IgG- and/or IgA B-memory cells and production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-23 and RANTES following stimulation with PA-antigens by peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained 28 days post immunization. Flow cytometry assays revealed that vaccine elicited PA-specific CD8+ and/or CD4+ T effector/memory cells were predominantly multifunctional concomitantly expressing CD107a and/or producing IFN-γ, TNF-α and/or IL-2. Similar proportions of these MF cells expressed, or not, the gut homing marker integrin α4β7. The results suggest that immunization with CVD 1902 elicits CMI responses against PA supporting its further evaluation as a potential vaccine candidate against paratyphoid A fever.
Keywords: Cell Mediated immunity, Multifunctional, Salmonella, Human, S. Paratyphi A, Vaccines
1. Introduction
Currently, the two main causes of enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever worldwide are the human-host restricted pathogens Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) and S. Paratyphi A [1]. Besides the substantial endemic Paratyphoid A disease burden recorded in Asia, S. Paratyphi is an increasing problem in U.S. and European travelers to endemic areas [2-5]. Among both endemic and travel-associated cases S. Paratyphi A strains carrying resistance to multiple clinically-relevant antibiotics are common, limiting treatment options [4].
Whereas the ultimate control of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers globally must derive from the universal provision of potable water and improved sanitation to all populations, in the interim the expanded use of safe, effective vaccines constitutes an important tool for preventing disease in both endemic populations and travelers [6]. Although well tolerated effective licensed vaccines are available to prevent S. Typhi disease, there are presently no licensed vaccines to prevent S. Paratyphi A disease; thus, the development of such vaccines is a priority [7].
Candidate vaccines against S. Paratyphi A in development include parenteral conjugate vaccines consisting of S. Paratyphi A O polysaccharide linked to different carrier proteins and attenuated strains of S. Paratyphi A such as CVD 1902 [8] and MGN10028 [9] used as live oral vaccines. The well-established efficacy of licensed live oral typhoid vaccine strain Ty21a (Vivotif®) [10] provided the impetus to develop attenuated S. Paratyphi A vaccine strain CVD 1902 by introducing into wild type S. Paratyphi A deletions in the guaBA chromosomal operon (which impairs the biosynthesis of guanine nucleotides) and clpX (which encodes a chaperone ATPase). Each of these mutations attenuates Salmonella [10,11]. The clpX mutation also increases expression of S. Paratyphi A flagellar antigens [11] which may enhance the induction of antibodies, cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and innate responses via engagement of TLR5 [12-16]. Pre-clinical studies in mice showed CVD 1902 to be safe, immunogenic and protective against intraperitoneal challenge with wild type S. Paratyphi A and paved the way for assessment of CVD 1902 in a dose-escalating phase 1 clinical trial in healthy adults in which single doses as high as 109 and 1010 colony forming units (CFU) were well tolerated.
CMI and humoral immune responses elicited by live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a, including cross-reactive responses to S. Paratyphi A or B, have been extensively studied. The results indicate that, in addition to humoral responses, Ty21a induces robust CD8+ and CD4+ T effector/memory responses (TEM) [17-27]. Interestingly, CD8+ T memory (TM) responses predominantly mediated by the TEM subset have been shown to be associated with protection against typhoid disease in a human challenge model with wild type S. Typhi [28,29], suggesting a significant role for these responses in protecting against typhoid fever [30-33]. Accordingly, we undertook to evaluate the ability of a single high (109 or 1010 CFU) dose of CVD 1902 to elicit S. Paratyphi A-specific B and T cell-mediated responses.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Vaccine and phase 1 clinical study design
Attenuated S. Paratyphi A vaccine strain CVD 1902, which harbors deletions in guaBA and clpX [13], was administered to successive groups of healthy adult Maryland volunteers, who received vaccine (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2) in step-wise, dose-escalating fashion. A single dose of vaccine containing 106, 107, 108, 109 or 1010 CFU was administered with NaHCO3 buffer (1.3% wt/vol); placebo consisted of PBS solution without vaccine strain with cornstarch (USP) to match the turbidity of the vaccine inoculum. At each dose step, participating volunteers were followed for 18 days after immunization in a Research Isolation Ward to monitor the clinical, microbiological, and immunological responses to the vaccine. The University of Maryland Baltimore Institutional Review Board approved the study and all volunteers gave informed consent prior to their enrollment ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: ). Herein we report the B- and T-CMI responses of the groups that received a 109 or 1010 CFU dose of vaccine, or placebo.
2.2. Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)
Whole blood samples were collected from volunteers before (day 0) and 28 days after immunization and PBMC were purified using density gradient centrifugation to perform B- and T-CMI assays for this study. Isolated cells were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen until use [14].
2.3. Antigens
2.3.1. S. Paratyphi A LPS
S. Paratyphi A LPS was purified under the supervision of Dr. Raphael Simon in the CVD Antigen Purification Unit, as described [34].
2.3.2. S. Paratyphi A flagella H-antigen (PA-flagella)
Flagellar antigen was purified from a rough (lacking smooth O-polysaccharide) S. Paratyphi A strain, as described [13].
2.3.3. Heat-phenolyzed whole-cell S. Paratyphi A particles (PA-particles)
S. Paratyphi A particles antigen consisted of heat-killed, phenol-preserved whole cell S. Paratyphi A (strain ATCC®9150) maintained in the CVD as a reference stock). The PA-particles were washed several times to remove residual phenol and preserved at 4 °C re-suspended in PBS (equivalent to 2 × 109 inactivated organisms/mL).
2.4. B memory (BM) assay
The BM enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (BM ELISpot) assay was described previously using expanded PBMC expanded for 5–6 days culture in the presence of B cell mitogens (Expansion phase) [34]. Briefly, duplicate wells of nitrocellulose membrane plates (MAHAN, Millipore, Billerica, MA) were coated with 5 μg/mL in PBS of purified S. Paratyphi A lipopolysaccharide (PA-LPS), anti-IgG or -IgA antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch), as well as with complete media (no-antigen, negative control) only. PA-LPS coated and no-antigen control duplicate wells were seeded with 150,000 expanded cells/well, developed and visualized using HRP-labeled anti-human IgA or IgG secondary antibodies and 3-Amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) (Calbiochem, Millipore Sigma) substrate. An automated Immunospot reader (Immunospot 3B, Cellular Technologies, OH) was used to read the plates and the quantification of spot-forming cells (SFC) was performed using Immunospot version 5.D software S2 (Cellular Technologies) (Fig. S1). B memory responses are reported as SFC/106 expanded cells. The frequencies of measured total IgG and/or IgA were used to assess the adequate expansion of BM cells in each sample. Any specimen with fewer SFC than the 10th percentile of all the samples assayed in this study (e.g., 20,300 and 2,785 SFC/106 expanded PBMC for IgG and IgA, respectively) was excluded from analysis. Among all samples studied, one of 12 vaccinees (a recipient of 109 CFU) was excluded from the analysis based on these criteria. LPS-PA-specific IgA or IgG B memory spots were normalized by subtracting non-specific background (no antigen control) as net SFC/106 expanded cells. Volunteers showing a post-vaccination over pre-immunization level increase of LPS-PA specific BM cells > 15 SFC/106 expanded cells (mean of IgA BM responses in placebo controls + 3 SE) were considered vaccine responders.
2.5. Cytokine measurements in culture supernatants
PBMC samples collected pre-and post-vaccination from 6 vaccinees who ingested 1010 CFU and 2 who ingested placebo) were cultured (1 × 106 PBMC/mL of culture media, final volume 200 μL/well in 96 well plates) in the absence (media only control) or presence of PA-flagella (5 μg/mL) or PA-particles (1 × 106 particles/mL) for 3 days. Culture supernatants were collected and kept at − 80 °C until tested for cytokines using the flow cytometry-based BD Cytometry Bead Array (CBA) human TH1/Th2 kit assay (BD biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations with some modifications described previously [35]. Net cytokine production was calculated by subtracting the cytokine levels (in pg/mL) of the “media alone” control wells from cytokine levels of antigen-stimulated wells for each individual volunteer on each day.
2.6. Target/stimulator cell preparation
Autologous Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B-LCL (EBV-B cells) were generated from PBMC obtained from each volunteer as previously described [36]. Wild-type S. Paratyphi A (wild-type S. Paratyphi A, ATCC®9150 strain maintained in the CVD, as a reference stock).
2.7. Ex-vivo PBMC stimulation
Thawed, overnight rested PBMC were stimulated with S. Paratyphi A-infected targets (Section 2.7) at a ratio of 10:1 (PBMC:target). After 2 h, the protein transport blockers Monensin (1 μg/mL, Sigma) and Brefeldin A (2 μg/mL; Sigma) were added to the PBMC cultures incubated overnight at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Media alone and uninfected autologous EBV-B cells were used as negative controls. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) (10 μg/mL; Sigma) was used as a positive control.
2.8. Surface and intracellular staining
Surface and intracellular staining (ICS) were performed as described [27,37]. Briefly, cells were surface stained with a panel of fluorochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD62L, integrin α4β7, CD107a, CD14, CD19 and yellow Live/DEAD™ fixable dead-cell dye (Invitrogen). Surface stained cells were fixed and permeabilized for ICS with mAbs against IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, and CD69. Stained PBMC were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and stored at 4 °C until analyzed. Flow cytometry was performed using a customized LSRII flow cytometer (BD) and data were analyzed using WinList version 9 (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA).
2.9. Gating protocol
The dead (live/dead dye positive), CD14+ and CD19+ cells, as well as “doublets” were excluded from the analysis. Total CD8+ (live CD3+, CD8+ CD4−) and CD4+ (live CD3+, CD8−CD4+) T cells and different T memory (TM) subsets were defined by their expression of CD45RA and CD62L, i.e., T central memory (TCM; CD62L+ CD45RA−), T effector memory (TEM; CD62L− CD45RA−) and T effector memory CD45RA+ (TEMRA; CD62L− CD45RA+) and Naïve T cells (TN; CD62L+ CD45RA+) (Fig. S2). The FCOM analysis tool (WinList version 9) was used to classify events based on combinations of gates in multidimensional space, i.e., whether cells express single (single positives; S+) or multiple intracellular cytokines and/or CD107a in all possible combinations for the enumeration of multifunctional cells (MF). Flow cytometry analyses were performed in at least 150,000 events in the live lymphocyte gate.
2.10. Statistical analyses
The statistical tests used to analyze each set of experiments are indicated in each Figure Legend. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
3. Results
3.1. Induction of S. Paratyphi A-specific B memory responses
S. Paratyphi A-LPS specific BM responses were evaluated in PBMC obtained from vaccinees (n = 11) before (D0) and 28 days (D28) following immunization with either 109 (n = 5) or 1010 (n = 6) CFU of CVD 1902 and in PBMC from placebo controls (n = 4). The data are shown as combined vaccinees from both dose levels, since no differences were observed in induction of BM responses between the 109 CFU versus the 1010 CFU cohorts (Fig. 1A-D). The PA-LPS specific IgG (Fig. 1A, B) and IgA BM (Fig. 1C, D) were detectable in both D0 and D28 samples; however, significant increases in the IgG and IgA BM responses were observed in post-vaccination day 28 compared to the corresponding pre-vaccination (D0) levels among vaccinees (Fig. 1A, C), but not in placebo controls (Fig. 1B, D). The net post-vaccination increases (Mean ± SEM of SFC/106 expanded cells) in PA-LPS specific IgG BM cells (23.0 ± 5.9) observed among CVD immunized volunteers were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than those observed in placebo controls (0 ± 0) (Fig. 1E). Similarly, the magnitudes of post vaccination increases in PA-LPS specific IgA BM in vaccinees and placebo controls were 27.3 ± 10.28 and 5.0 ± 3.3 SFC/106 expanded cells, respectively (p < 0.1) (Fig. 1E). Using increases of > 15 SFC to define responders (Fig. 1E), 7 and 6 out of 11 vaccinees for IgG (64%) and IgA (55%), respectively, showed increases in BM responses, while no such increases were observed in the placebo group (0 out of 4, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1F).
Fig. 1.
Measurement of S. Paratyphi A Lipopolysaccharide (PA-LPS) specific memory B (BM) cells in volunteers immunized with CVD 1902. PBMC were obtained from CVD 1902 vaccinees (V; n = 11) and placebo (P; n = 4) controls in Cohort 4 (109 CFU; V = 5, P = 2) and Cohort 5 (1010 CFU; V = 6, P = 2), before (D0) and 28 days (D28) after immunization and PA-LPS specific IgG (A,B) and IgA (C,D) PA-LPS specific BM responses were measured. Net data were calculated as antigen coated wells minus non-antigen coated wells (A–D). Dotted lines connect the baseline and D28 values of the same individual (A–D). Post-vaccination increases were calculated as D28 minus D0 levels (E). Volunteers showing Post-vaccination increases > 15 SFC/106 (dotted line) were considered responders (E) and their percentages among vaccinees (V) or placebo (P) are shown in panel F. P values were calculated using 1-tail Mann-Whitney t-test (E) or Chi-square test (F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
3.2. T cell mediated immune responses elicited by CVD 1902
3.2.1. Cytokine production in PBMC culture supernatants
To evaluate the T-CMI response, we first measured cytokine/chemokine production by PBMC collected before and 28 days after immunization, following in-vitro stimulation with PA-flagella or PA-bacterial particles preparation in recipients of 1010 CFU. Post-vaccination increases of > 2 fold over pre-vaccination levels in the production of IFN-γ (Fig. 2A), TNF-α (Fig. 2B), IL-10 (Fig. 2C), RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) (Fig. 2D) and IL-23 (Fig. 2E) were observed in most immunized volunteers, but not in placebo controls. Overall, 5 out of 6 (83%) immunized volunteers showed > 2 fold vaccination increases in at least two or more cytokines, while no increases were observed in placebo controls (Fig. 2F).
Fig. 2.
Cytokine production in culture supernatants of CVD 1902 immunized volunteers. PBMC samples were obtained from volunteers participating in Cohort 5 (1010 CFU, 6 vaccinees, closed circles and 2 placebo controls, open squares). Cytokine/chemokine levels in S. Paratyphi A (PA) flagella- or bacterial particles (PA-Particles)-stimulated culture supernatants for IFN-γ (A), TNF-α (B), IL-10 (C), RANTES (D) and IL-23 (E). Net data were calculated as antigen stimulated minus non-antigen (media only) stimulated levels. Post-vaccination increases were calculated as post-vaccination / pre-vaccination levels (fold increases). Broken horizontal lines represent 2-fold post-vaccination increases. Vaccine responders were defined as subjects showing > 2-fold post-vaccination increases for two or more cytokines (F). P values were calculated using 1 tail chi-square tests. *p < 0.05.
3.2.2. Induction of S. Paratyphi A-specific CD8+ T effector/memory (TEM) cells
We next evaluated T cell immune responses elicited by CVD 1902 by characterizing the CD8+ T effector/memory (TEM, live CD3+CD4− CD8−+ CD45−CD62L−) cells for their expression of CD107a or production of cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α) following ex-vivo culture with PA-infected autologous targets, as described in the Methods (Section 2.8). We used PBMC obtained before and 28 days after immunization from the vaccinees (n = 12), ingesting 109 (n = 6) and 1010 CFU (n = 6) of CVD 1902, as well as from placebo controls (n = 4). The magnitude of the post-vaccination increases in PA specific CD69+CD8+ TEM cells expressing CD107a or producing IFN-γ, IL-2 or TNF-α in vaccinees was higher than observed in placebo controls, but did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 3A). However, 7 out of these 12 immunized volunteers (58%), showed post-vaccination increases in two or more specific responses or “functions” (e.g., expression of CD107a, production of IFN-γ, IL-2 and/or TNF-α) and were considered CD8+ vaccine responders. No CD8+ vaccine responders were observed among the 4 placebo recipients (Fig. 3B). These CD8+ vaccine responders (n = 7) showed a significantly higher magnitude of post-vaccination increases in CD107a, IFN-γ, IL-2 and/or TNF-α+CD8+ TEM cells compared to those observed among vaccinees who were not CD8+ vaccine responders (non-responders, 5 out of 12 vaccinees) or in placebo (n = 4) controls (Fig. 3C). Of note, 2 placebo controls showed post-vaccination increases only in CD107a+ CD8+ TEM cells but not with any of the other cytokines evaluated.
Fig. 3.
CMI responses mediated by CD8+ TEM cells following immunization with CVD 1902 or Placebo. PBMC were collected before (Day 0) and 28 days post-vaccination from vaccinees (V; open circles) immunized with 109 CFU (cohort 4) or 1010 CFU (cohort 5) of CVD 1902 or Placebo (P; buffer only; open squares). Post vaccination increases in the expression of CD107a (107a) or production of cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2) in response to S. Paratyphi A-infected EBV-B (target) cells were measured in CD8+ CD69+ T effector/memory (TEM) cells (A). Post-vaccination increases of ≥ 0.1% (dotted horizontal line in A) in PA target-specific CD8+ CD69+ TEM cells producing/expressing at least 2 functions (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 and/or CD107a) were used to define CD8 vaccine responders (VR; B) in cohorts 4, 5 or combined. Comparisons of the magnitudes of post-vaccination increases in expression of CD107 or cytokine responses in VR, NR (non-responders) and Placebo control (P) volunteers are shown in C. Post-vaccination increases were calculated as Post-vaccination responses at day 28 minus pre-vaccination (day 0) levels. P values were obtained by comparing the VR to the corresponding NR (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) or P (#, < 0.05, ## p < 0.01) by Mann-Whitney test, one tail.
3.2.3. Multifunctional and gut-homing characteristics of CD8+ TEM cells in CD8+ vaccine responders
We further categorized PA-infected target specific CD8+ TEM cells as single positive cells (S+) expressing / producing only one of the functions (e.g., CD107a, IFN-γ, IL-2 or TNF-α) or those concomitantly producing two or more functions as multifunctional cells (MF) cells (Fig. 4). We observed that CD8+ TEM cell-mediated PA-specific responses in CD8+ vaccine responders (n = 7, described earlier in Section 3.2.2) were mostly comprised of MF cells (Fig. 4A) compared to the corresponding S+ cells. Further characterization of these MF cells showed that vaccine elicited PA-specific induction of MF PA-specific cells that produced IFN-γ (Fig. 4C), IL-2 (Fig. 4D), or TNF-α (Fig. 4E) were observed at a significantly higher magnitude than the corresponding S+ cells. However, increases observed in total (Fig. 4A) and CD107a+ (Fig. 4B) MF cells were not statistically significant. MF cells can also be categorized into double (2+), triple (3+) or quadruple (4+) positive based on their concomitant expression of CD107a and/or production of IFN-γ, IL-2 and/or TNF-α. Such detailed subtyping of MF cells revealed that CVD 1902-elicited MF cells in CD8+ vaccine responders were comprised of similar proportions of 2+, 3+ and 4+ subsets (Fig. S3A). We further investigated the gut-homing potential of the PA specific MF cells by measuring their concomitant expression of the gut homing marker integrin α4β7 (Fig. 5) and observed that vaccine elicited total PA-specific CD8+ TEM MF cells were equally represented by cells expressing integrin-α4β7 (α4β7+; 58.1% ± 11.8) or not (α4β7−; 56.6% ± 13.2) (Fig. 5). Integrin α4β7+ and α4β7− cells in PA-specific CD107a+, IFN-γ+, IL-2+ and TNF-α+ MF cells were also elicited at similar magnitudes following immunization with CVD 1902 in CD8+ vaccine responders (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4.
Induction of multifunctional (MF) CD8+ TEM cells following immunization with CVD 1902 in CD8 vaccine responders. S. Paratyphi A (PA)-responses in PBMC collected from CVD 1902 vaccinees (n = 7) who were considered “CD8 vaccine responders” as defined in the legend to Fig. 3 and the text. Shown are post-vaccination increases in IFN-γ+(A), IL-2+(B), TNF-α+(C), CD107a+(D), and total PA-specific CD8+ CD69+ TEM cells (any function) (E), with cells categorized as single positive (S+) or multifunctional (MF, > 2 functions). P values were obtained by comparing the corresponding S+ and MF cells by Wilcoxon signed rank test, one tail. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Fig. 5.
Gut homing potential of CVD 1902 elicited multifunctional (MF) CD8+ TEM cells in CD8 vaccine responders. Post-vaccination increases in S. Paratyphi A specific CD8 TEM MF cells were categorized according to their concomitant expression of the gut homing marker integrin α4β7 in CD8 vaccine responders (n = 7) as defined in the legends to Figs. 3 and 4. Data are shown as mean ± SE. Statistical analyses between cells co-expressing integrin α4β7 or not were performed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.
3.2.4. Characterization of S. Paratyphi A–specific CD4+ TEM cells by CVD 1902 immunization
Because PA-specific CD4+ TEM cells are also an important component of the CMI response to Salmonella, we next investigated these responses in volunteers following immunization with CVD 1902 (Fig. 6). Post-vaccination increases of > 0.1% of PA-specific CD4+ TEM cells in at least 2 or more functions (e.g., expression of CD107a and/or production of IFN-γ, IL-2 or TNF-α) were observed in 6 out of 12 (50%) vaccinees (CD4+ vaccine responders) (Fig. 6A). Similar to our observations with CD8+ vaccine responses, the magnitude of the post-vaccination increases in total PA-specific CD4+ TEM MF cells among these CD4 vaccine responders (n = 6) were significantly higher (p < 0.02) than the corresponding S+ cells (Fig. 6B). The predominance of MF cells over S+ was also observed in PA-specific CD107a+ (Fig. 5C, p < 0.02), IFN-γ+ (Fig. 5D, p < 0.02), IL-2+ (Fig. 5E, p < 0.02) and TNF-α+ (Fig. 5F, p < 0.02) CD4+TEM cells among CD4+ vaccine responders, but not among vaccinees who did not respond by CD4+ mediated T-CMI (non-responders, 6 out of 12; p > 0.2) or placebo controls (n = 4, p > 0.2). Similar to our observations with CD8+ responses, vaccine elicited CD4+ MF cells were also comprised of similar proportion of 2+, 3+ and 4+ subsets (Fig. S3B).
Fig. 6.
Induction of multifunctional (MF) CD4+ TEM cells following immunization with CVD 1902. PBMC collected before (Day 0) and 28 days post-vaccination from vaccinees (V) immunized with 109 CFU (cohort 4) or 1010 CFU (cohort 5) of CVD 1902 or Placebo (P) were used to measure the expression of CD107a (107a) or production of cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2) in response to S. Paratyphi A-infected autologous EBV-B (target) in CD4+CD69+ T effector/memory (TEM) cells. Post-vaccination increases of ≥ 0.1 in PA target-specific CD4+CD69+ TEM cells producing/expressing at least 2 functions (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 and/or CD107a) was used to define CD4 vaccine responders (A). Post-vaccination increases in Total PA-specific CD4+CD69+ TEM cells (any function) (B) and individual functions, including CD107a+ (C), IFN-γ+(D), IL-2+ (E) and TNF-α+ (F) cells categorized as single positive (S+) and multifunctional (MF) are shown in CD4 vaccine responders (VR, n = 6), non-responders (NR, n = 6) and in Placebo control (P, n = 4). P values were obtained by comparing the corresponding S+ and MF+ cells by Wilcoxon signed rank test, one tail. *p < 0.05.
3.2.5. Comparison and multifunctional profiles of vaccine elicited CD8 and CD4 T cells responses
We next investigated whether individual volunteers responded to immunization by exhibiting CD4, CD8 or both responses following vaccination. We first examined the magnitude of post-vaccination increases observed in PA-specific T cell responses mediated by CD8+ and CD4+ TEM subsets in CVD 1902 vaccinees (n = 12) to determine whether a particular T cell subset predominates. Although of different magnitude, not significant differences were observed in vaccine-elicited PA-specific CD4 and CD8 responses (Fig. S4A). We then examined whether the CD4 and CD8 responses were concordant in each individual. Out of 12 volunteers who were immunized with CVD 1902, 8 of them (67%) were either CD8+ and/or CD4+ vaccine responders (Sections 3.2.2 and 3.2.3, respectively). The majority (63%, 5 out of 8) of these CD8+ and/or CD4+ vaccine responders elicited both PA-specific CD8+ and CD4+ TEM cells. A correlation analysis between the magnitude of post-vaccination increases in PA-specific CD8+ and CD4+ TEM cells showed that significant correlations were only observed in IFN-γ responses (Fig. S4B) by CD4+ and CD8+ cells.
4. Discussion
CVD 1902 is the first live oral vaccine candidate against paratyphoid A fever, so far, to be evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial. Herein we describe in detail the induction of immune memory by evaluating PA-specific B- and T-cell-mediated effector/memory responses in PBMC from the two groups of volunteers who ingested, with buffer, a single dose of CVD 1902 containing either 109 or 1010 CFU, or placebo. Previous studies reported the induction of B memory cells (BM) against LPS, O-polysaccharides and protein antigens in humans following natural infection or after immunization with oral vaccines against S. Typhi or other enteric bacteria (e.g., Shigella, Vibrio cholerae O1, Escherichia coli) [34,38-45]. In agreement with those earlier findings, in this study we also observed increases in the magnitudes of PA-LPS-specific IgG and IgA BM following oral immunization with S. Paratyphi A CVD 1902.
IgG and IgA BM responses against LPS or O-specific polysaccharides were shown to correlate with protection from natural V. cholerae clinical infection and with decreased disease severity in a human challenge model of shigellosis [38,43,46]. Data reported herein suggest that a single dose of CVD 1902 with either 109 or 1010 CFU primed the host-immune system to generate PA-specific BM that could play a role in host-immunity against PA infection. Of note, albeit of lower magnitude, we also detected IgG or IgA BM cells responding to the LPS, purified from S. Paratyphi A, in some pre-vaccination specimens. It is likely that BM responses detected in the pre-vaccination samples or placebo controls resulted from cross-reactivity derived from natural exposure to other gram-negative or Salmonella responses (e.g., minor antigen 12 which is shared among Group A, Group B and Group D Salmonella serovars).
Thus, we demonstrate that a single oral dose of an attenuated PA vaccine elicits PA-LPS-responsive BM cells. However, due to the lack of PBMC samples collected at later post-vaccination time-points, we could not evaluate the persistence or predominance of a specific isotype (e.g., IgG or IgA) of this vaccine induced PA specific BM cells in circulation beyond 28 days after immunization.
Cytokine measurements in PBMC culture supernatants following in vitro stimulation with PA-specific antigens were performed in vaccinees receiving 1010 CFU of CVD 1902 due to limitations in the availability of PBMC samples from other cohorts. The cytokines/chemokines that distinguished vaccine elicited responses (cytokine vaccine responders), from placebo controls included those predominantly produced by T cells (e.g., IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, RANTES) and monocytes/type 1 macrophages (e.g., IL-23) [47,48]. Immunization of volunteers with live oral S. Typhi vaccines were also reported to show post-vaccination increases in production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-10 following in vitro stimulation with S. Typhi antigens [10,32,35,49]. Moreover, similar responses showing increased production of various cytokines including IFN-γ, MIP-1β and TNF-α have also been reported in convalescent typhoid fever patients [50]. The critical role these cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12, IL-23 or RANTES) have been implicated in the clearance of Salmonella infections and/or potentiating the host-immunity against Salmonella by mobilizing various immune cells to the sites of infection, including the gut mucosa [48]. Collectively, observations in this manuscript suggest that CVD 1902 induces a T-CMI response showing a Th1 cytokine profile, arguably an important element in protection against Salmonella infection.
To characterize the cell subsets that contribute to vaccine-elicited T-CMI responses, we profiled antigen-specific TEM cells, a key subset of TM cells that are elicited following immunization with live oral S. Typhi vaccines and which has been associated with protection from wt S. Typhi challenge [28,29]. We also evaluated their MF properties as well as gut-homing potential [51-53]. Antigen specific MF T cells are known to produce higher levels of individual cytokines, exhibit enhanced functions and their role in protection from disease has been recognized [51,52]. We have previously shown that immunization with a moderately effective licensed live oral attenuated typhoid vaccine (Ty21a) elicits MF CD8+ and CD4+ TEM responses against S. Typhi which are cross reactive with PA [27,37]. Our current study with PA vaccine strain CVD 1902 also showed the induction of PA specific CD8+ TEM cells expressing CD107a+(representing cytotoxic T cells) and/or producing other key Th1 cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2), which may contribute to effective immunity against PA [32]. Of note, in this study, almost two-thirds of the CVD 1902 vaccinees were CD8+ vaccine responders, a similar proportion to CD8+ vaccine responders observed with Ty21a vaccination [27,32,33,54]. Salmonella including PA infects humans via the gut mucosa and therefore, in addition to systemic immunity, an effector/memory response at the gut level is thought to be a critical component of vaccine elicited immunity [31,32,55]. Previously we observed that S. Typhi vaccines (e.g., Ty21a, CVD 909) elicited S. Typhi-specific MF CD8+ TEM cells which express, or not, integrin α4β7 [22,27,37,56] in peripheral blood, as well as in the terminal ileum lamina propria of the vaccinees [57]. Similar to those studies, we observed the induction of a substantial proportion of PA-specific TEM CD8+ MF cells that co-expressed the gut homing molecule integrin α4β7 in the majority of CVD 1902 immunized volunteers. These observations are suggestive of an ability of CVD 1902 to induce a mucosal immune response mediated by PA specific MF CD8+ TEM, which can be critical in preventing a PA infection.
In addition to the induction of CD8+ TEM responses, S. Typhi immunized volunteers also demonstrated the induction of a Salmonella cross-reactive CD4+ TEM responses to both Salmonella-infected targets and S. Typhi soluble antigens (e.g., flagella) [24,31,35,37]. Our current observations demonstrated a similar induction of PA-specific MF CD4+ mediated TEM cell responses in a significant proportion of CVD 1902 immunized volunteers. These PA specific MF cells produced IFN-γ, TNF-α and/or IL-2 MF cells with a smaller subset also showing cytotoxic potential by co-expressing CD107a [37]. The role of these PA-specific cytokine producing CD4+ TEM cells in protection remains unknown; however, in a mouse model, it was shown that efficient induction of CD4+ T cell mediated Th1 response, e.g., production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and/or IL2 is needed for clearance or resistance to Salmonella infection [58,59]. Overall, these observations demonstrated that CVD 1902 is immunogenic in humans and elicits an orchestrated immune response favoring a Th1 response. However, further studies are required to evaluate whether these immune responses are correlated with protection against PA infection.
In previous studies with S. Typhi vaccine strains Ty21a, CVD 908-htrA or CVD 909 immunized volunteers, we showed different dominance of CD4 and CD8 responses depending on the time point after immunization (up 1 year post-vaccination) and the antigens used for in vitro stimulation [22-24,27,35,37,56,60]. Unfortunately, the current study was limited by the availability of a single time point post-immunization (28 days) and a relatively small number of volunteers. Thus, the interpretation of the current findings will need to be revisited in future studies in which a larger number of participants and multiple later times points become available.
5. Conclusions
Paratyphoid A fever caused by PA has emerged as a major health problem in enteric fever endemic areas of the world. Currently no vaccine against this disease is available. A novel live attenuated PA vaccine (CVD 1902) was developed to aid in the prevention of PA infection. In the current study we evaluated, for the first time, B and T cell mediated immune responses in volunteers immunized with the vaccine strain CVD 1902. Our observations showed that a single dose of either 109 CFU or 1010 CFU of CVD 1902 elicited PA specific BM and T effector memory responses mediated by both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in almost two third of the vaccinees. The vaccine induced T cell responses were predominately mediated by PA specific-MF cells with a cytokine production pattern suggestive of Th1 responses. These results suggest that this vaccine strain has the potential to protect against PA infection. Future challenge studies with wt PA and field studies will establish the importance of these B and T memory responses in protection and accelerate the development of attenuated vaccines, in single or multiple doses, for PA. Of note, the CVD 1902 vaccine has been licensed to Bharat Biotech International, Ltd. (Hyderabad, India), which has also licensed live oral S. Typhi vaccine strain CVD 909 [61], thereby paving the way for commercial development of a bivalent (CVD 909/CVD 1902) live oral vaccine against the two major agents that cause enteric fever.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thankfully acknowledge Kaushiki Mazumdar, Regina Harley and Catherine Storrer for excellent technical assistance. We also thank the participating volunteers, Robin Barnes and the staff from the Recruiting Section of Center for Vaccine Development for the blood specimens. This study was funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) grants U54-AI057168 (Regional Center for Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Mid-Atlantic Region [MARCE] and U19-AI109776 (Center of Excellence for Translational Research [CETR] to M.M.L. and M.B.S, R01-AI036525 (to M.B.S.), and U19 AI082655 (Cooperative Center for Human Immunology [CCHI] to M.B.S.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsor (NIAID, NIH).
Abbreviations:
- CMI
Cell-mediated immunity
- MF
Multifunctional
- PA
S. Paratyphi A
- S+
Single positive cells
- TEM
T effector/memory
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.003.
References
- [1].Bhan MK, Bahl R, Bhatnagar S, Typhoid and paratyphoid fever, Lancet 366 (2005) 749–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Arndt MB, Mosites EM, Tian M, Forouzanfar MH, Mokhdad AH, Meller M, Ochiai RL, Walson JL, Estimating the burden of paratyphoid a in Asia and Africa, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 8 (2014) e2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Meltzer E, Stienlauf S, Leshem E, Sidi Y, Schwartz E, A large outbreak of Salmonella Paratyphi A infection among Israeli travelers to Nepal, Clin. Infect. Dis 58 (2014) 359–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Teh CS, Chua KH, Thong KL, Paratyphoid fever: splicing the global analyses, Int. J. Med. Sci 11 (2014) 732–741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Crump JA, Mintz ED, Global trends in typhoid and paratyphoid fever, ClinInfectDis 50 (2010) 241–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Duclos P, Okwo-Bele J-M, Salisbury D, Establishing global policy recommendations: the role of the strategic advisory Group of Experts on immunization, Exp. Rev. Vaccin 10 (2011) 163–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Levine MM, Ferreccio C, Black RE, Lagos R, San MO, Blackwelder WC, Ty21a live oral typhoid vaccine and prevention of paratyphoid fever caused by Salmonella enterica Serovar Paratyphi B, Clin. Infect. Dis 45 (Suppl. 1) (2007) S24–S28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Martin LB, Simon R, MacLennan CA, Tennant SM, Sahastrabuddhe S, Khan MI, Status of paratyphoid fever vaccine research and development, Vaccine 34 (2016) 2900–2902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Roland KL, Tinge SA, Kochi SK, Thomas LJ, Killeen KP, Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A enteric fever vaccine candidates, Vaccine 28 (2010) 3679–3687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Levine MM, Typhoid fever vaccines, in: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, Edwards KM (Eds.), Plokin's Vaccines, Elsevier, Inc., Philadelphia, 2018, pp. 1114–1144. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Wang JY, Pasetti MF, Noriega FR, Anderson RJ, Wasserman SS, Galen JE, Sztein MB, Levine MM, Construction, genotypic and phenotypic characterization, and immunogenicity of attenuated DeltaguaBA Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain CVD 915, Infect. Immun 69 (2001) 4734–4741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Gewirtz AT, Navas TA, Lyons S, Godowski PJ, Madara JL, Cutting edge: bacterial flagellin activates basolaterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression, J. Immunol 167 (2001) 1882–1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Gat O, Galen JE, Tennant S, Simon R, Blackwelder WC, Silverman DJ, Pasetti MF, Levine MM, Cell-associated flagella enhance the protection conferred by mucosally-administered attenuated Salmonella Paratyphi A vaccines, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 5 (2011) e1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Sztein MB, Wasserman SS, Tacket CO, Edelman R, Hone D, Lindberg AA, Levine MM, Cytokine production patterns and lymphoproliferative responses in volunteers orally immunized with attenuated vaccine strains of Salmonella typhi, J. Infect. Dis 170 (1994) 1508–1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Wyant TL, Tanner MK, Sztein MB, Salmonella typhi flagella are potent inducers of proinflammatory cytokine secretion by human monocytes, Infect. Immun 67 (1999) 3619–3624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Wyant TL, Tanner MK, Sztein MB, Potent immunoregulatory effects of Salmonella typhi flagella on antigenic stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Infect. Immun 67 (1999) 1338–1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Kirkpatrick BD, McKenzie R, O'Neill JP, Larsson CJ, Bourgeois AL, Shimko J, Bentley M, Makin J, Chatfield S, Hindle Z, Fidler C, Robinson BE, Ventrone CH, Bansal N, Carpenter CM, Kutzko D, Hamlet S, LaPointe C, Taylor DN, Evaluation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Ty2 aroC-ssaV-) M01ZH09, with a defined mutation in the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2, as a live, oral typhoid vaccine in human volunteers, Vaccine 24 (2006) 116–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Lindow JC, Fimlaid KA, Bunn JY, Kirkpatrick BD, Antibodies in action: role of human opsonins in killing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, Infect. Immun 79 (2011) 3188–3194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].McArthur MA, Sztein MB, Heterogeneity of multifunctional IL-17A producing S. Typhi-specific CD8+ T cells in volunteers following Ty21a typhoid immunization, PLoS One 7 (2012) e38408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Salerno-Goncalves R, Fernandez-Vina M, Lewinsohn DM, Sztein MB, Identification of a human HLA-E-restricted CD8+ T cell subset in volunteers immunized with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain Ty21a typhoid vaccine, J. Immunol 173 (2004) 5852–5862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Salerno-Goncalves R, Pasetti MF, Sztein MB, Characterization of CD8(+) effector T cell responses in volunteers immunized with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain Ty21a typhoid vaccine, J. Immunol 169 (2002) 2196–2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Salerno-Goncalves R, Wahid R, Sztein MB, Immunization of volunteers with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain Ty21a elicits the oligoclonal expansion of CD8+ T cells with predominant Vbeta repertoires, Infect. Immun 73 (2005) 3521–3530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Salerno-Goncalves R, Wahid R, Sztein MB, Ex vivo kinetics of early and long-term multifunctional human leukocyte antigen E-specific CD8+ cells in volunteers immunized with the Ty21a typhoid vaccine, Clin. Vaccine Immunol 17 (2010) 1305–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Salerno-Goncalves R, Wyant TL, Pasetti MF, Fernandez-Vina M, Tacket CO, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Concomitant induction of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in volunteers immunized with Salmonella enterica serovar typhi strain CVD 908-htrA, JImmunol 170 (2003) 2734–2741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Wahid R, Salerno-Goncalves R, Tacket CO, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Cell-mediated immune responses in humans after immunization with one or two doses of oral live attenuated typhoid vaccine CVD 909, Vaccine 25 (2007) 1416–1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Wahid R, Salerno-Goncalves R, Tacket CO, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Generation of specific effector and memory T cells with gut- and secondary lymphoid tissuehoming potential by oral attenuated CVD 909 typhoid vaccine in humans, Mucosal Immunol. 1 (2008) 389–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Wahid R, Fresnay S, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Immunization with Ty21a live oral typhoid vaccine elicits crossreactive multifunctional CD8+ T-cell responses against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, S. Paratyphi A, and S. Paratyphi B in humans, Mucosal Immunol. 8 (2015) 1349–1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Fresnay S, McArthur MA, Magder LS, Darton TC, Jones C, Waddington CS, Blohmke CJ, Angus B, Levine MM, Pollard AJ, Sztein MB, Importance of Salmonella Typhi-responsive CD8+ T cell immunity in a human typhoid fever challenge model, Front. Immunol 8 (2017) 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Fresnay S, McArthur MA, Magder L, Darton TC, Jones C, Waddington CS, Blohmke CJ, Angus B, Levine MM, Pollard AJ, Sztein MB, Salmonella Typhi-specific multifunctional CD8+ T cells play a dominant role in protection from typhoid fever in humans, J. Transl. Med 14 (2016) 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Salerno-Goncalves R, Sztein MB, Cell-mediated immunity and the challenges for vaccine development, Trends Microbiol. 14 (2006) 536–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Sztein MB, Cell-mediated immunity and antibody responses elicited by attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi strains used as live oral vaccines in humans, Clin. Infect. Dis 45 (Suppl. 1) (2007) S15–S19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Sztein MB, Salerno-Goncalves R, McArthur MA, Complex adaptive immunity to enteric fevers in humans: lessons learned and the path forward, Front. Immunol 5 (2014) 516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Sztein MB, Is a human CD8 T-cell vaccine possible, and if so, what would it take? CD8 T-Cell-mediated protective immunity and vaccination against enteric bacteria, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol 10 (2018) (a029546, PMID: 29254983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Wahid R, Simon R, Zafar SJ, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a induces cross-reactive humoral immune responses against Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A and S. Paratyphi B in humans, Clin. Vaccine Immunol 19 (2012) 825–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Wahid R, Salerno-Goncalves R, Tacket CO, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Cell-mediated immune responses in humans after immunization with one or two doses of oral live attenuated typhoid vaccine CVD 909, Vaccine 25 (2007) 1416–1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Sztein MB, Tanner MK, Polotsky Y, Orenstein JM, Levine MM, Cytotoxic T lymphocytes after oral immunization with attenuated vaccine strains of Salmonella typhi in humans, J. Immunol 155 (1995) 3987–3993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Wahid R, Fresnay S, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Cross-reactive multifunctional CD4+ T cell responses against Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi, Paratyphi A and Paratyphi B in humans following immunization with live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a, Clin. Immunol 173 (2016) 87–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Aktar A, Rahman MA, Afrin S, Akter A, Uddin T, Yasmin T, Sami MIN, Dash P, Jahan SR, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, LaRocque RC, Charles RC, Bhuiyan TR, Mandlik A, Kelly M, Kovac P, Xu P, Calderwood SB, Harris JB, Qadri F, Ryan ET, Plasma and memory B cell responses targeting O-specific polysaccharide (OSP) are associated with protection against Vibrio cholerae O1 infection among household contacts of cholera patients in Bangladesh, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 12 (2018) e0006399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Alam MM, Aktar A, Afrin S, Rahman MA, Aktar S, Uddin T, Rahman MA, Al Mahbuba D, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Bhuiyan TR, Begum YA, Ryan ET, Calderwood SB, Svennerholm AM, Qadri F, Antigen-specific memory B-cell responses to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Bangladeshi adults, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 8 (2014) e2822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Harris AM, Bhuiyan MS, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Hossain A, Kendall EA, Rahman A, LaRocque RC, Wrammert J, Ryan ET, Qadri F, Calderwood SB, Harris JB, Antigen-specific memory B-cell responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 infection in Bangladesh, Infect. Immun 77 (2009) 3850–3856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Jayasekera CR, Harris JB, Bhuiyan S, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Faruque AS, LaRocque RC, Ryan ET, Ahmed R, Qadri F, Calderwood SB, Cholera toxin-specific memory B cell responses are induced in patients with dehydrating diarrhea caused by Vibrio cholerae O1, J. Infect.Dis 198 (2008) 1055–1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Simon JK, Maciel M Jr., Weld ED, Wahid R, Pasetti MF, Picking WL, Kotloff KL, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Antigen-specific IgA B memory cell responses to Shigella antigens elicited in volunteers immunized with live attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a oral vaccine candidates, Clin. Immunol 139 (2011) 185–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Wahid R, Simon JK, Picking WL, Kotloff KL, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Shigella antigen-specific B memory cells are associated with decreased disease severity in subjects challenged with wild-type Shigella flexneri 2a, Clin. Immunol 148 (2013) 35–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Simon JK, Wahid R, Maciel M Jr., Picking WL, Kotloff KL, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Antigen-specific B memory cell responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and invasion plasmid antigen (Ipa) B elicited in volunteers vaccinated with live-attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a vaccine candidates, Vaccine 27 (2009) 565–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Wahid R, Pasetti MF, Maciel M Jr., Simon JK, Tacket CO, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Oral priming with Salmonella Typhi vaccine strain CVD 909 followed by parenteral boost with the S. Typhi Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine induces CD27+IgD-S. Typhi-specific IgA and IgG B memory cells in humans, Clin. Immunol 138 (2011) 187–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Haney DJ, Lock MD, Gurwith M, Simon JK, Ishioka G, Cohen MB, Kirkpatrick BD, Lyon CE, Chen WH, Sztein MB, Levine MM, Harris JB, Lipopolysaccharide-specific memory B cell responses to an attenuated live cholera vaccine are associated with protection against Vibrio cholerae infection, Vaccine 36 (2018) 2768–2773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Pham OH, McSorley SJ, Protective host immune responses to Salmonella infection, Future Microbiol. 10 (2015) 101–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Eckmann L, Kagnoff MF, Cytokines in host defense against Salmonella, Microbes Infect. 3 (2001) 1191–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Sztein MB, Wasserman SS, Tacket CO, Edelman R, Hone D, Lindberg AA, Levine MM, Cytokine production patterns and lymphoproliferative responses in volunteers orally immunized with attenuated vaccine strains of Salmonella typhi, J. Infect. Dis 170 (1994) 1508–1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Bhuiyan S, Sayeed A, Khanam F, Leung DT, Rahman Bhuiyan T, Sheikh A, Salma U, LaRocque RC, Harris JB, Pacek M, Calderwood SB, LaBaer J, Ryan ET, Qadri F, Charles RC, Cellular and cytokine responses to Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi proteins in patients with typhoid fever in Bangladesh, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg 90 (2014) 1024–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Seder RA, Darrah PA, Roederer M, T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for vaccine design, Nat. Rev. Immunol 8 (2008) 247–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Darrah PA, Patel DT, De Luca PM, Lindsay RWB, Davey DF, Flynn BJ, Hoff ST, Andersen P, Reed SG, Morris SL, Roederer M, Seder RA, Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major, Nat. Med 13 (2007) 843–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Thakur A, Pedersen LE, Jungersen G, Immune markers and correlates of protection for vaccine induced immune responses, Vaccine 30 (2012) 4907–4920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Sztein MB, Cell-mediated immunity and antibody responses elicited by attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi strains used as live oral vaccines in humans, Clin. Infect. Dis 45 (Suppl. 1) (2007) S15–S19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Pasetti MF, Simon JK, Sztein MB, Levine MM, Immunology of gut mucosal vaccines, Immunol. Rev 239 (2011) 125–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Wahid R, Salerno-Goncalves R, Tacket CO, Levine MM, Sztein MB, Generation of specific effector and memory T cells with gut- and secondary lymphoid tissuehoming potential by oral attenuated CVD 909 typhoid vaccine in humans, Mucosal Immunol. 1 (2008) 389–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Booth JS, Patil SA, Ghazi L, Barnes R, Fraser CM, Fasano A, Greenwald BD, Sztein MB, Systemic and terminal ileum mucosal immunity elicited by Oral immunization with the Ty21a typhoid vaccine in humans, Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 4 (2017) 419–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Dougan G, John V, Palmer S, Mastroeni P, Immunity to salmonellosis, Immunol. Rev 240 (2011) 196–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Maybeno M, Redeker A, Welten SP, Peters B, Loughhead SM, Schoenberger SP, Sette A, Arens R, Polyfunctional CD4+ T cell responses to immunodominant epitopes correlate with disease activity of virulent Salmonella, PLoS One 7 (2012) e43481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Salerno-Goncalves R, Sztein MB, Priming of Salmonella enterica serovar typhi-specific CD8(+) T cells by suicide dendritic cell cross-presentation in humans, PLoSOne 4 (2009) e5879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Wang JY, Noriega FR, Galen JE, Barry E, Levine MM, Constitutive expression of the Vi polysaccharide capsular antigen in attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhi oral vaccine strain CVD 909, Infect. Immun 68 (2000) 4647–4652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






